EP0079761B1 - A sturdy i-girder - Google Patents

A sturdy i-girder Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0079761B1
EP0079761B1 EP19820306003 EP82306003A EP0079761B1 EP 0079761 B1 EP0079761 B1 EP 0079761B1 EP 19820306003 EP19820306003 EP 19820306003 EP 82306003 A EP82306003 A EP 82306003A EP 0079761 B1 EP0079761 B1 EP 0079761B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
girder
web
plies
wood
laminated
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
EP19820306003
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0079761A1 (en
Inventor
Matti Kairi
Markku Lehtonen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Metsaliiton Teollisuus Oy
Original Assignee
Metsaliiton Teollisuus Oy
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Metsaliiton Teollisuus Oy filed Critical Metsaliiton Teollisuus Oy
Publication of EP0079761A1 publication Critical patent/EP0079761A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0079761B1 publication Critical patent/EP0079761B1/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04BUILDING
    • E04CSTRUCTURAL ELEMENTS; BUILDING MATERIALS
    • E04C3/00Structural elongated elements designed for load-supporting
    • E04C3/02Joists; Girders, trusses, or trusslike structures, e.g. prefabricated; Lintels; Transoms; Braces
    • E04C3/12Joists; Girders, trusses, or trusslike structures, e.g. prefabricated; Lintels; Transoms; Braces of wood, e.g. with reinforcements, with tensioning members
    • E04C3/14Joists; Girders, trusses, or trusslike structures, e.g. prefabricated; Lintels; Transoms; Braces of wood, e.g. with reinforcements, with tensioning members with substantially solid, i.e. unapertured, web

Definitions

  • the dimensioning factor is bending flexure (span 1 in Figure 1).
  • the dimensioning factor is bending stress (span 2, Figure 1), and in the opposite extreme, in which the load is great and the span is short, the dimensioning factor is shearing stress (span 3 in Figure 1).
  • DE-A-2334524 shows an I-section girder made of wood material. This has a web formed from three plies; two outer plies having their grain parallel to the web length and a single, thicker ply sandwiched between them which has its grain transverse to the web length. The web is finger-jointed into a length of solid timber forming at least a major part of one boom of the I-section.
  • the girder described in DE-A-2334524 is of relatively small size with a typical height of 200 mm and a web thickness of about 25-30 mm. Such a girder is intended for relatively short term use supporting moulds during building word with short bearing spans and large shear forces.
  • I-girders having a minimum web of 65 mm are prescribed for use in public areas in Finland.
  • the fire resistance of an I-girder according to the invention is at minimum 1/2 hour.
  • Figure 3 shows a known laminated-wood girder made in the shape of an I-profile, having a web u and booms p.
  • Figure 4A depicts a known I-girder, in which the web u is made of plywood and fitted between wide booms p.
  • Figure 4B for its part shows an also known box-structured plywood girder.
  • Figure 5 depicts one example of the dimensioning of a girder according to the invention.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Architecture (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Rod-Shaped Construction Members (AREA)

Description

  • The invention relates to a sturdy I-girder. Sturdy timber girders are currently manufactured by gluing laminae of sawn timber together, and the product is called laminated wood. The strength/ weight ratio of laminated wood is rather advantageous. However, it is characterized in that the strength property which determines the dimensioning in different load situations varies, whereupon the timber girder in question is overdimen- sioned as regards other properties.
  • As regards strength, three main factors are primarily concerned. First there is bending flexure, which is in general approximately girder span/200-300, e.g. 50 mm for a span of 15 m.
  • The second one is the bending stress produced by the load in the girder. It is at its greatest in the middle of the span in the case of a single-span girder. A certain theoretical bending stress, characteristic of the material, must not be exceeded, since otherwise there is the risk that the girder breaks in the middle.
  • The third factor is the shearing stress produced by the load in the girder; the ends of the girder are subjected to shearing stress by the supports. With great loads, the shearing force tends to split a laminated-wood girder at its ends in the longitudinal direction in such a way that the lower edge of the girder is stretched because of the bending flexure and the upper surface resists this displacement, whereupon the girder splits at its ends on the horizontal level along the center line.
  • Starting from one of the extremes of the capacity range of laminated wood, namely, a long span and a small load, the dimensioning factor is bending flexure (span 1 in Figure 1). In the middle of the range the dimensioning factor is bending stress (span 2, Figure 1), and in the opposite extreme, in which the load is great and the span is short, the dimensioning factor is shearing stress (span 3 in Figure 1).
  • As noted above, when one factor determines the dimensioning, laminated wood is overdimen- sioned in other respects. To correct this situation, laminated wood has been glued also in the form of an I-profile (Figure 3).
  • Bending flexure and bending stress can in this way be optimized so that there is no overdi- mensioning with respect to either one of these factors, which results in a considerable saving in raw material. However, this cannot be realized except in certain special situations, since shearing stress will, when the load increases, dimension the narrowed web in such a way that it should be widened. Thus, sufficient benefit cannot be drawn from this profile so as to make its manufacture economically sensible. Therefore such laminated wood is currently not manufactured to a significant degree.
  • The use of plywood between wide booms has been studied as a second alternative. The shear strength of plywood is sufficient, but the tendencies of crinkling and buckling owing to the very slim and narrow structure (Figure 4A) have become a problem. Attempts have been made to solve these problems by gluing so-called box structures (Figure 4B), but in this case expensive joint alternatives have been required, because if economical use of plywood sheets is desired, they must be made into sheets having the same length as the girder. The fact that piywood- webbed sturdy composite girders are generally not manufactured is evidently due, in addition to the above, to the difficult control of the behavior of the girder in question in conditions of varying dampness and to its non-existent fire resistant properties.
  • DE-A-2334524 shows an I-section girder made of wood material. This has a web formed from three plies; two outer plies having their grain parallel to the web length and a single, thicker ply sandwiched between them which has its grain transverse to the web length. The web is finger-jointed into a length of solid timber forming at least a major part of one boom of the I-section. The girder described in DE-A-2334524 is of relatively small size with a typical height of 200 mm and a web thickness of about 25-30 mm. Such a girder is intended for relatively short term use supporting moulds during building word with short bearing spans and large shear forces.
  • The finger joint and the solid timber used in this girder are both disadvantageous. The joining of large pieces is difficult and the reliability of the joint and its bearing capacity decrease with size. There is a waste of wood when the joint is machined. The endurance (working life) of the joint is bad because the stresses are directed to a small area; solid timber has a poor and variable working life and a tendency to warp.
  • Laminated veneer lumber is a prior known product, in which there is first manufactured from plies over 2 mm thick, by weather-proof gluing, a 25-75 mm thick and up to 2 metres wide, continuous, up to 30 m long sheet. The grain of most of the plies is longitudinally oriented. Laminated-wood girders, planks or various small profiles are obtained by cutting the sheet. The product has been on the market since the beginning of 1978.
  • Laminated veneer lumber has an advantage in being usable for many distinctly different purposes, since it has been possible to vary its structure within a wide range, when necessary. For this reason, the sturdy I-girder of this invention was consciously developed through the optimization of laminated veneer lumber.
  • The objective set was a sturdy, continuous and fire-resistant girder in which bending flexure, bending stress and shearing stress would all be equal dimensioning factors, whereby a maximal saving of material would be achieved. Surprisingly, this objective was achieved when the solution according to the characteristics of any one of the accompanying claims was invented, in which laminated veneer lumber is utilised.
  • For example, in the fire resistance classification, I-girders having a minimum web of 65 mm are prescribed for use in public areas in Finland. The fire resistance of an I-girder according to the invention is at minimum 1/2 hour.
  • With an I-girder according to the invention, long spans can be achieved in such a way that the cross section is clearly smaller than that of a laminated-wood girder dimensioned for the corresponding span. A table of comparison is enclosed. The table shows the maximum spans for a laminated veneer, i.e. multi-ply, I-girder and corresponding laminated wood, when the effects of the three main dimensioning factors, bending stress, shearing stress and bending flexure, have been taken into consideration separately. The maximum final span of the girder is the minimum of these three span values.
  • The following advantages can be recorded for the benefit of a laminated veneer, i.e. multi-ply I-girder as compared with a laminated-wood girder:
    • - A cross section 37-84% smaller than with laminated wood can be achieved with a structure of the same height, see table.
    • -Owing to the cross bands of the web and the booms, the expansion of the girder in the vertical direction is almost completely prevented, whereas in laminated wood there is a difference of about 4% between completely dry and wet wood.
    • - Owing to the cross bands in the web, the jointing technique is simpler at the ends of the I-girder.
    • - Owing to the cross bands and the vertical glued joints of the booms, the pressures, or forces, by which the surfaces of the girder and the underlying support press against each other do not constitute a problem. (The end of a narrow grider collapses, when this pressure is too great.)
    • -The fire resistance of the multi-ply I-girder, adequate as such, is easily improved by means of fire-resistance classified wool.
    • -The same manufacturing technique can be used for manufacturing very sturdy box girders, and since the materials of the web and the booms are to a great extent similar, warping due to dampness can be controlled.
    • - In addition to being used as a sturdy horizontal girder, the profile in question can be used as a pillar, in which case it has very high stability values and makes jointing techniques very simple in that the booms of the pillar are made to continue beyond the pillar web to the extent of the height of the web of an associated horizontal girder, and the web of the horizontal girder continues beyond the booms of the horizontal girder to the extent of the height of the pillar web. Thus the booms of the pillar can be easily joined to the web of the horizontal girder (Figure 6).
  • The invention is illustrated below with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which Figure 1 depicts graphically different load cases of laminated wood and Figure 2 depicts graphically a comparison of the strength properties of a laminated wood girder and a laminated veneer lumber I-girder. Figure 3 depicts a known I-girder made of laminated wood, and Figure 4 a known I-girder and a box girder made from plywood. Figure 5 depicts a laminated- veneer lumber I-girder according to the invention, and Figure 6 a special application of an I-girder according to the invention.
  • Figure 1 shows graphically, with the span L of the girder as the vertical axis and the load F as the horizontal axis, the effect of bending flexure Iw, bending stress Ib and shearing stress Iv on the dimensioning of ordinary laminated wood. The proportions are presented arbitrarily, and so bending stress does not necessarily have the sector width of the type plotted. Bending flexure is the dimensioning factor within span 1, bending stress within span 2, and shearing stress within span 3. Figure 2 depicts graphically the cross- sectional area of laminated wood L (dotted lines) and corresponding multi-ply I-girders K (solid lines) as functions of the product which is obtained by multiplying by each other the maximum span values for bending and shearing strengths and bending flexure. The spacings of the supports are 4.8, 6.0 and 7.2 m (cf. the table). Three spans have been taken for each spacing, and both a laminated-wood girder and a laminated veneer I-girder have been optimized for each span, and so the differences indicate that a certain strength property of laminated timber has overcapacity.
  • Figure 3 shows a known laminated-wood girder made in the shape of an I-profile, having a web u and booms p. Figure 4A depicts a known I-girder, in which the web u is made of plywood and fitted between wide booms p. Figure 4B for its part shows an also known box-structured plywood girder.
  • Figure 5 depicts one example of the dimensioning of a girder according to the invention.
  • Figure 6 shows how an I-girder according to the invention can be used as a pillar and be joined in a simple manner to a horizontal girder in such a way that the booms pp of the pillar continue beyond the pillar web up to the extent of the height of the web u" of the horizontal girder, and the web u" of the horizontal girder for its part continues beyond the booms p" of the horizontal girder to the extent of the height of the pillar web UP.
  • Figures 5 and 6 illustrate clearly the general structure of the I-girder according to the invention. Thus, the girder comprises a web u and a total of four booms p, which have been glued to the edges of the web on both sides of the web. The booms also consist of laminated veneer lumber, and their grain orientation is always in the longitudinal direction of the web, in addition to which the grains of most of the different plies of the web are in the longitudinal direction of the web. One conventional arrangement is such that the web is assembled from a great number of plies, for example 26 plies one on top of the other, the second, fourth and tenth ply, claculated from each surface of the web, having a transverse grain orientation. In the arrangement of the grain orientation, an arrangement symmetrical in relation to the center plane is generally used, and the installation of transverse-grain plies on the surface is avoided so that they would not be destroyed first in a fire.
  • Figure imgb0001

Claims (3)

1. Sturdy I-girder, characterised in that the web (u) of the girder is made from continuous laminated veneer lumber, having a number of plies, a plurality of which, amounting to 10-60%, preferably 30%, of the total have the grain transverse in relation to the web (u) length while the remaining plurality of the plies have the grain parallel to the web length, and the booms (p) of the girder are made of laminated veneer lumber having the ply grain parallel to the length of the web (u).
2. An I-girder made of timber-based material, comprising a web (u) which is a laminate of a plurality of plies of wood, of which a plurality amounting to 10-60% have their grain transverse in relation to the longitudinal direction of the girder, the remaining plurality of plies having their grain parallel to the said direction; together with narrow parts (p) at the edges of the web, projecting beyond the faces of the web (u) to give the I-section, said narrower parts (p) being laminates of a plurality of plies of wood having their grain parallel to the said direction.
3. An I-girder according to claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the web (u) is at least 65 mm thick.
EP19820306003 1981-11-18 1982-11-11 A sturdy i-girder Expired EP0079761B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FI813663A FI62887C (en) 1981-11-18 1981-11-18 GROV I-BALK
FI813663 1981-11-18

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0079761A1 EP0079761A1 (en) 1983-05-25
EP0079761B1 true EP0079761B1 (en) 1986-02-26

Family

ID=8514880

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19820306003 Expired EP0079761B1 (en) 1981-11-18 1982-11-11 A sturdy i-girder

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0079761B1 (en)
CA (1) CA1196169A (en)
DE (1) DE3269471D1 (en)
DK (1) DK511282A (en)
FI (1) FI62887C (en)

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4669243A (en) * 1985-11-06 1987-06-02 Truswal Systems Corporation Fire protective system and method for a support structure
FR2599770B1 (en) * 1986-06-09 1991-11-15 Jomard Daniel Gantry cranes made from CTBX, traditional timber cuts and tube spindles
US5377472A (en) * 1992-02-06 1995-01-03 Terenzoni; Bob Timber system
US5974760A (en) * 1993-03-24 1999-11-02 Tingley; Daniel A. Wood I-beam with synthetic fiber reinforcement
US6173550B1 (en) 1993-03-24 2001-01-16 Daniel A. Tingley Wood I-beam conditioned reinforcement panel
CA2192427C (en) * 1996-08-19 2001-07-31 Marcel Leblanc Steel-wood system
WO1998007933A1 (en) 1996-08-19 1998-02-26 Les Bois Laumar Inc. Steel-wood system
FR2764622A1 (en) * 1997-06-17 1998-12-18 Paul Henri Mathis Vegetable fibre base composite beam used in constructions, especially of support structures
CA2353202C (en) 2001-07-17 2009-01-06 Guildo Deschenes I-shaped wooden beam
ES2964354T3 (en) 2020-06-05 2024-04-05 Phylem Structures Sl Technical wood structural system

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE1825643U (en) * 1960-11-22 1961-01-26 Wilhelm Poppensieker Fa MULTI-PANEL MADE OF SEVERAL ALTERNATING LAYERS GLUED TOGETHER WITH PLYWOOD LAYERS.
AT298013B (en) * 1970-01-12 1972-04-25 Oesterr Doka Schalung Box girder made of wood
FR2367883A1 (en) * 1976-10-12 1978-05-12 Uhalde Bernier Sa Compound plywood section for construction industry - has box or I=section and is fabricated of plywood sheets with staggered joints
GB1514879A (en) * 1976-10-22 1978-06-21 Nickerson & Co Ltd W Joints in wooden structural elements
DE8033681U1 (en) * 1980-12-18 1981-05-27 Achberger GmbH & Co KG, Karl, 8903 Bobingen DEVICE FOR SUPPORTING COMPONENTS, SHUTTERING OR THE LIKE

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA1196169A (en) 1985-11-05
DK511282A (en) 1983-05-19
FI62887B (en) 1982-11-30
FI62887C (en) 1983-12-05
EP0079761A1 (en) 1983-05-25
DE3269471D1 (en) 1986-04-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4191000A (en) Wooden I-beam
US5974760A (en) Wood I-beam with synthetic fiber reinforcement
US5761872A (en) Variable length truss and method for producing the same
US5653080A (en) Fabricated wooden beam with multiple web members
US4413459A (en) Laminated wooden structural assembly
US4012882A (en) Structural building panels
US10464294B2 (en) Wood panel assemblies and methods of production
EP0079761B1 (en) A sturdy i-girder
US2886857A (en) Wooden beam constructions
US4228631A (en) Hollow rectangular joist
US3003204A (en) Corrugated wood laminate and process
US5079894A (en) Wooden X-beam
US6212846B1 (en) Isosceles joist
CA1182266A (en) Service girder of wood as well as a process for the manufacture thereof
US3170198A (en) Wooden i-beam
US5507905A (en) Diagonal veneer laminate
US3947309A (en) Pitched wooden truss with integral ridge connector
US4891927A (en) Joint for connecting wooden beams to each other, and the use of the joint in roof truss structures
JPH03256703A (en) Manufacture of multiple solid wood construction body and product thereby
US5891550A (en) Structural member with increased shear resistance
US20240052632A1 (en) Bamboo construction element
CN111805640B (en) Processing method of high-performance oriented structural slab composite board and product
CN212684928U (en) High-performance oriented structural slab composite board
CA1184013A (en) Laminated wooden structural assembly
SU947349A1 (en) Wooden beam

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): AT CH DE FR GB LI NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19830805

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): CH DE FR LI SE

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): CH DE FR LI SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3269471

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19860403

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 19901121

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19901130

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19901130

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19901130

Year of fee payment: 9

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Effective date: 19911112

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Effective date: 19911130

Ref country code: CH

Effective date: 19911130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Effective date: 19920731

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Effective date: 19920801

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 82306003.3

Effective date: 19920604