EP0036752B1 - Protection apparatus for electric power transmission systems - Google Patents

Protection apparatus for electric power transmission systems Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0036752B1
EP0036752B1 EP81301137A EP81301137A EP0036752B1 EP 0036752 B1 EP0036752 B1 EP 0036752B1 EP 81301137 A EP81301137 A EP 81301137A EP 81301137 A EP81301137 A EP 81301137A EP 0036752 B1 EP0036752 B1 EP 0036752B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
feeder
mutual coupling
zero sequence
signal
proportional
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
EP81301137A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0036752A1 (en
Inventor
Adrian Orton Newbould
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
General Electric Company PLC
Original Assignee
General Electric Company PLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by General Electric Company PLC filed Critical General Electric Company PLC
Publication of EP0036752A1 publication Critical patent/EP0036752A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0036752B1 publication Critical patent/EP0036752B1/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02H—EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS
    • H02H3/00—Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection
    • H02H3/40—Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection responsive to ratio of voltage and current
    • H02H3/402—Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection responsive to ratio of voltage and current using homopolar quantities
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02H—EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS
    • H02H7/00—Emergency protective circuit arrangements specially adapted for specific types of electric machines or apparatus or for sectionalised protection of cable or line systems, and effecting automatic switching in the event of an undesired change from normal working conditions
    • H02H7/26—Sectionalised protection of cable or line systems, e.g. for disconnecting a section on which a short-circuit, earth fault, or arc discharge has occured
    • H02H7/267—Sectionalised protection of cable or line systems, e.g. for disconnecting a section on which a short-circuit, earth fault, or arc discharge has occured for parallel lines and wires

Definitions

  • This invention relates to protection apparatus for electrical power transmission systems.
  • the mutual coupling compensation signal be controlled in dependence on the ratio of the zero sequence currents in the other feeder and the protected feeder, the compensation being cut- .off when the ratio exceeds a predetermined value.
  • Such an arrangement has the disadvantage that quite a substantial time is necessary to arrive at a decision as to whether or not to cutoff the compensation and to effect cutting-off of the compensation.
  • Such an arrangement is not suitable for use in modern protection apparatus in which minimum operating times of 5 milliseconds or even lower are common.
  • the mutual coupling compensation signal is controlled in dependence on the ratio of the zero sequence currents in the other feeder and said feeder
  • the mutual coupling compensation signal is arranged to be proportional to the zero sequence current in the other feeder when the ratio of the zero sequence currents in the other feeder and said feeder is below a predetermined value, and when said ratio is above said predetermined value is limited to a value proportional to the zero sequence current in said feeder.
  • the required limiting can be effected almost instantaneously and does not involve the sort of time delay which is necessary with the prior art arrangement wherein before cutting-off the mutual coupling compensation it is desirable to be sure that the high zero sequence current ratio condition is a permanent condition and not merely a transient condition.
  • the transmission system comprises a parallel pair of feeders G and H connecting two sources of 3-phase a.c. electrical power S1 and S2, the required 3- phase line arrangements being indicated by single lines in Figure 1.
  • the feeders are protected by four circuit breakers CB1 to CB4 one connected at each end of each feeder.
  • the circuit breakers are controlled by respective distance relays DR1 to DR4.
  • Each relay determines the values relative to set values of various impedances of its associated feeder in a direction towards the other distance relay associated with that feeder, and on the basis of the result of such determination makes a decision as to whether its associated circuit breaker should be opened.
  • the relay is supplied by way of current transformers (not shown) with currents I A , I B and I C respectively representative of the currents of the three phases of the associated feeder H.
  • the currents I A , I B and I C are also summed and the resultant current I N ' which is three times the zero sequence current of the feeder H, is used to provide neutral compensation of the earth fault impedance determining elements in the relay.
  • currents representative of the phase currents of the parallel feeder G are summed to provide a current I M representative of three times the zero sequence current of the feeder G, this current being used to provide mutual coupling compensation of the earth fault impedance determing elements in the relay.
  • the relay includes impedance replicas Z ⁇ , Z N and Z,, represented by block 1 in Figure 2, whose magnitudes and phase angles determine the phase impedance, neutral compensation and mutual coupling compensation settings respectively of the relay. These impedance replicas together with the current inputs are utilised to produce voltages I A Z R , I B Z R , I C Z R , I N Z N and I M Z M . These voltages together with voltages V A , V B , V e and V N respectively representative of the phase and neutral voltages of the feeder H are fed to decision making elements 3 of the relay wherein a decision is made as to whether the associated circuit breaker should be opened.
  • the constant K is chosen to split the gap between the correct compensation conditions and the limiting conditions thus giving a safety margin for both situations.
  • the limit is always above the I M Z M signal and therefore does not influence the signal.
  • the limiting action comes in before the mutual compensation is large enough to cause maloperation.
  • Studies have shown that a K value of 1.5 will generally give adequate safety margins between conditions requiring correct mutual compensation and those requiring limiting.
  • the K value can be made adjustable, if desired, in case 1.5 proved unsuitable for particular power systems.
  • the response time of the dynamic control circuit must be faster than the operating time of the distance relay to which it is applied.
  • the trend in new designs of such relays is for minimum operating times of around 0.25 cycles or 5 mS for a 50 Hz system.
  • the proposed control has no inherent delays and is suitable for application for very high speed protection.
  • One practical arrangement which has been built and tested has a speed of response of typically 1 mS.
  • the type of limiting required depends on the measurement principles of the protection to which it is applied. There are two possible forms, peak limiting and waveshape limiting. The former is simple and inexpensive, however, difficulties can arise because the signal I M Z M ' approaches a square wave as the ratio of I M Z M to I N Z N increases. Some relays could be adversely affected by one of the input signals having a square instead of a sine waveshape. This is easily overcome by controlling the waveshape such that it has an approximate sine waveshape. This method is considered suitable for all known measuring principles used in relays. Since the limiting is applied only to prevent maloperation then the I M Z M ' signal can have significant distortion under these conditions. The critical factor tends to be the maximum rate of rise of any part of the waveform, and it is this which must be controlled.
  • the circuit comprises a two-stage feedback amplifier arrangement comprising operational amplifiers 7 and 9 to which the signal I N Z N is applied as input, the arrangement providing an output of 1.5 I N Z N at the output of the second amplifier 9.
  • the output of the amplifier 9 is applied to a further operational amplifier 11 which serves to limit excursions of one polarity of the signal on a pair of lines 13 and 15, to which the signal I M Z M is applied via a resistor 17, to the value 1.5 I N Z N .
  • a further amplifier 19 to which the output of amplifier 9 is applied via an inverter comprising an operational amplifier 21 serves to limit excursions of the signal on the lines 13 and 15 of the other polarity to the value 1.5 INZ N .
  • Figure 5 gives examples of the signal waveforms for the unlimited and the limited conditions.
  • the power system parameters dictate that the currents I N and I M will be close to being either in-phase or anti-phase, this helps in the case where waveshape limiting is applied, as shown in the diagrams.
  • the unlimited condition waveforms are an example of a fault on the protected feeder where the mutual compensation is less than Kl N Z N and therefore the signal I M Z M ' is the correct mutual compensation.
  • the limited condition waveforms are typical of faults on the parallel feeder where maloperation on standard mutual compensation could occur.
  • the input signal I M Z M is much greater than Kl N Z N and hence the limits apply and control the size of the signal I M Z M '. This signal shows some distortion, but this is unlikely to cause problems in the distance relay. If necessary, the signal I M Z M can be filtered to reduce the distortion.

Landscapes

  • Emergency Protection Circuit Devices (AREA)
EP81301137A 1980-03-21 1981-03-18 Protection apparatus for electric power transmission systems Expired EP0036752B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB8009709 1980-03-21
GB8009709 1980-03-21

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0036752A1 EP0036752A1 (en) 1981-09-30
EP0036752B1 true EP0036752B1 (en) 1984-06-27

Family

ID=10512296

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP81301137A Expired EP0036752B1 (en) 1980-03-21 1981-03-18 Protection apparatus for electric power transmission systems

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US4370691A (d)
EP (1) EP0036752B1 (d)
AU (1) AU540253B2 (d)
DE (1) DE3164383D1 (d)
IN (1) IN155998B (d)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB0127745D0 (en) * 2001-11-20 2002-01-09 Alstom Protection of double circuit power lines

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE618220C (de) * 1932-03-08 1935-09-06 Siemens Schuckertwerke Akt Ges Erdschlussschutzschaltung fuer den Schutz von Energieverteilungsnetzen mit parallelen Leitungen
DE1098590B (de) * 1958-12-09 1961-02-02 Elektro App Werke J W Stalin V Schaltungsanordnung zur selektiven Abschaltung von Erdkurzschluessen auf Drehstrom-Doppelleitungen

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CH409086A (de) * 1963-06-17 1966-03-15 Bbc Brown Boveri & Cie Distanzschutzanordnung für parallele Leitungen in Netzen mit geerdetem Sternpunkt
US3430103A (en) * 1966-10-27 1969-02-25 Westinghouse Electric Corp Mutual impedance compensation for distance relaying

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE618220C (de) * 1932-03-08 1935-09-06 Siemens Schuckertwerke Akt Ges Erdschlussschutzschaltung fuer den Schutz von Energieverteilungsnetzen mit parallelen Leitungen
DE1098590B (de) * 1958-12-09 1961-02-02 Elektro App Werke J W Stalin V Schaltungsanordnung zur selektiven Abschaltung von Erdkurzschluessen auf Drehstrom-Doppelleitungen

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU6856481A (en) 1981-09-24
DE3164383D1 (en) 1984-08-02
US4370691A (en) 1983-01-25
IN155998B (d) 1985-04-20
EP0036752A1 (en) 1981-09-30
AU540253B2 (en) 1984-11-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2257410C (en) Method and device for testing differential protection relays or differential protection relay systems
US4161011A (en) Ground distance relay employing phase comparator measurement
EP0316203B1 (en) Protective relay
US4297740A (en) Protective relaying apparatus
US4329727A (en) Directional power distance relay
US4607309A (en) Apparatus for detecting arcing faults on low-voltage spot networks
US4342064A (en) Static distance relays with improved polarizing signal
CA1319969C (en) Transformer differential relay
US4566053A (en) Ground-fault protective relay
US20190187201A1 (en) Method and Device for Detecting Faults in Transmission and Distribution Systems
US4631622A (en) Multiple static trip circuit breaker coordination
EP0083772A1 (en) Protective relay apparatus
US4295175A (en) Pilot wire relay protection system for electrical distribution networks
US7053503B2 (en) Cross current compensation control system for a power system
US4825323A (en) Out-of-step blocking unit
EP0036752B1 (en) Protection apparatus for electric power transmission systems
EP0626107B1 (en) Method and device for preventing overstabilization of longitudinal differential protection in case of internal fault
GB2072973A (en) Power Feeder Protection Apparatus
Bergeal et al. Single-phase faults on compensated neutral medium voltage networks
GB1535124A (en) Control apparatus for responding to a fault current in a power transmission line
US3591831A (en) Harmonic filter protection means
SU982136A1 (ru) Способ резервной защиты трансформатора
US2378800A (en) Protective system
SU815829A1 (ru) Устройство дл защитного отключени В ТРЕХфАзНОй элЕКТРичЕСКОй СЕТи СизОлиРОВАННОй НЕйТРАлью
SU936214A1 (ru) Способ управлени установкой компенсации реактивной мощности в аварийных режимах

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): CH DE FR SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19811009

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: THE GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, P.L.C.

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): CH DE FR LI SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3164383

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19840802

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: BBC AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT BROWN,BOVERI & CIE.

Effective date: 19850323

PLBN Opposition rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009273

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: OPPOSITION REJECTED

27O Opposition rejected

Effective date: 19860815

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19910207

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19910227

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 19910307

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19910527

Year of fee payment: 11

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Effective date: 19920319

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Effective date: 19920331

Ref country code: CH

Effective date: 19920331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Effective date: 19921130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Effective date: 19921201

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 81301137.6

Effective date: 19921005