DE1924695U - LABEL TAPE. - Google Patents

Description

GERMAN PATENT OFFICE 8000 MUNICH 2, Zweibröckensfroße

New telephone number 21 95 1 telephone number 229451, telex 05-23534 "

Direct dialing number 21 95 remote call direct dialing via 22945 house call '.'

r, ⁿ Amen _{Z n oak:} .öMJ.J24j 5..iö ... M22 / 67?

Mr. patent attorney

Your sign:

43 brooms

Kettwiger Str. 789

Decision

In the

the Fa * Gete · Seuster IS ·,

(Weotf.),

- T @ rtr © tea

Patent attorney "

Issea »Kettwiges ¹ Str. 789

the M © to-G © selleahaft Oster Sind m "bH.,

Cologne, because

by Pateataas ^ lt®

. ¥ ^ relGcliGsa, Ms. Dipl.-Ins. ^ * Pricea, 50 -

2mt

des Getrauciu3Huster3 1 924 695 2mt the utility

II d @@ Deu- iachea l ^ t © ntasts in the Sitzimg rom

The forwarding is done for the purpose of delivery

tast.-document

! ei Rec. notification:

Deposit in the recipient's collection point

: zl. Gbm. Lö. 24

April 26, 1968 with the participation of Heg · Director Kaube as Torsitsendsr and the Upper Government Councilors Bipl.-Ing · Wieohers and Dipl.-Dr.-Ing. Blachetski decided after an oral hearing:

Bas utility model 1 924 695 is by way of the SeillSschung mit maintain the following Schutsana claims:

(ΊΙ · Label tape, which consists of an underlay tape and self-adhesive labels adhering to it in a row and which is provided with indentations or recesses on (at least one) of its tapes »which are attached to the delimiting lines of the labels running at right angles to the longitudinal direction of the tape at the distance between the labels and pressure for control of the label feed in or Etikettenbe- ^ serve Etiketteixausgebegeräten »characterized in that _f iaindestens the one hand is _(f provided 11j / with ■" tooth heads and tooth gaps, form the congruent surfaces to each other ·

2 «Label tape according to claim 1», characterized ₉ that ^ this tape (11) is designed as a wavy line (7).

3. Label ribbons cut from a wide ribbon

,, _? according to claim 2, characterized in that the labels (4) adjacent label tapes (if2 _t 3) are offset from one another and the wave crests (9) of one tape (1) lie in the wave troughs (10) of the other tape (2) *

4. Label tape according to claim t to 3 »characterized in that that the wave crests (9) on the girders (11) in the middle

S between the two straight and parallel limiting. lines (12) of the label (4) lie.

V ■ i ■■ '■ - ■ "■

5. Label tape according to claim 4, characterized in that the wavelength is accommodated within a label length (15). j _...- ■. ■ *

■■. ■. ■■■. . ■ ■:; ^f - 3 -

6, label strip according to claim 1 "characterized in that ^ f of the band (11) is formed as a zig-zag line (S).

The further application for investigation is rejected. The costs of the proceedings are annulled against each other.

, 9? at to e β ta η fl:.

The utility model 1 924 695 registered on August 11, 1964 and registered Jaa 30 September 1965 relates to a label tape with at least partially non-longitudinal tape for controlling the length of the gate chub s, B, a printing and dispensing device.

The registered protection request includes 8 protection claims

Protection claim 1 reads in the form on which the entry is based:

1 · Itikettenband with at least partially not running in the longitudinal direction of the hand with control of the amount of the gate push, for example a printing and dispensing device8 _f characterized in that. at least one hand (11) is designed as a continuously running tooth line (6) *

For further claims 2 to 8, reference is made to the registration files.

The applicant has requested »

to delete the utility model and the costs of the proceedings to impose on the respondent

The motion for dissolution is justified by the fact that the tree shape of the Utility model in dispute was not new on the day of registration

be »there the sram state of the art ! publications, for example the USA patent documents 784 375» 2 825 166 and
£ _58 <1 * 4β8 * - the French Patentsctol ^ te ^ J ^ JST ^ SS »1 282 636,
or the French ^ ie ^ ^ itscEriJ jBÖ 4gi gtikettenhändernitlir <known tm found were, in which at least one band
is designed as a continuously running cream line

In relation to claim 2, the applicant states that the subject matter
of claim 2 any credible progress is lacking, since the
Control of the scan through the well-known notches in the label; bands is much more accurate than with shallow wave troughs
the utility model in dispute. In addition, label tapes are included
wavy edges of British Patent 957 589 as
known to infer that the claim 2 also because of lack of
The novelty is not capable of protection:

However the Raumfona the EtikettenMnder by Hen claims {3 to 3 of the Streitgetsrauehemusters respect to the to the registry

der! Technik is no longer new · _;

The subject of the use of the dispute is also essentially identical "as described in the prospectus of the applicant
who sold them from 1953 to 1958 (see Gebrüder Seuster brochures) #

The applicant replies to the reasoning of the opponent's objection that the third tooth lines of the eti |; chain straps according to the citations were geometrically different; formed as in the drawings of the dispute utility fence,: but it is still a continuous line of anticipation and therefore also the defendant's definition
match the citations *

Finally, the applicant points out that it

belongs to the state of the art for a long time, to the material and

- 5-

Labor savings levels serlegen regularly so ZVL that a simple gaps © classification of these levels at least konguente Einselforaen is achieved in · Hiersu is on the books "system of FlächentoilunglJSfite 8 and" Stansereitechnik "Vol · Ϊ 'te pointed 344 · ■ - ~~ - ~~~ · «~~» ^^

The applicant replied to the reference of the utility model department in the interim notification of 9 · Koveaber 1967t that claim 1 needs to be specified, insofar as the problem is apparently only solved with a spatial shape "where the continuously running tooth line and tooth gaps form congruent surfaces""The subject matter of claim 1 lacks the necessary level of invention" since the British patent specification 957 589 * shows a label tape sitting on a line of vision as known, with tooth tips and tooth gaps forming congruent surfaces and the use of these Eaumfors for any other purpose is irrelevant is · Likewise necessarily Terlustfreies Pushing · Regarding is apparent while the lossless preparing a continuous-ester idea line aa label tape edges, the / applicant still screens bands, ζ · Β · Sfesabänder (Prospkt Beiersdo ^ f AS and price list ^ö Tesabanä ⁿ der Beiersdorf AG) bsw * velvet ribbons (apparently pre-used velvet ribbons from the company Η · Α. Schmitz W · Since pieces would abgetrenijtt ia 1955) out of these bands, whether they be regarded as label Mnder · Furthermore, the ^ is aumfora the dispute use Auster vorweggenoxaaen by UESA-PatenCschrift 2,589,168, as well as this document, a Btikettenbanä »it lossless manufactured wavy lines as known su can be seen, whose table heads and Vellenlückea form congruent planes.

i ■■■■■.

I -

The respondent objected to the application in good time and requested, ■ "■. ■

j "■ ■

the application at the expense of the applicant

• 6 *

To justify its objection, the respondent cites in

individual ex ■ "■■; ..

The tone of the references mentioned by the applicant "proved that the construction form of the contested usage model was new at the time of the application. It was the task of the present utility model to improve the label tapes, which were proven to be known by the applicant, by virtue of the fact that they are both lossless cut out of a "wide band, as well as provided with a band marking to control the label presetting ·

The Btikettenband according & qt buttocks claim 1 "claimed Rauaform is new and the claimed Baumfora ha" not be

nearby, under a continuously running Terzahnungs «|

line be there "if you understand a line, which regularly follows!

left and right | deviations from a straight line are the same

before surfaces "limit ·" - "[.

With regard to the subject matter of claims 2 and 7, the respondent stated that the design of the label tape edge as an ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ line [or Ziclczackline ¥ halje the gate part, that such an easy eating j

such as "the people who sell labels and the" British patent specification 957 589 the wavy or zigzag edge design is not known as well . be taken

Having regard to the utility model t 940,799 makes the Antragsgegixerin contends that other control edge I have recognized in the art Sätige that! Slit deficiencies of the known itikettenMnder and sur by KSsungen Termeidumg the like with them> \ ζ · Β · by discharging .es notch cutouts have been looking for Häsgel.

To the claims 2 to 6 and 8 of the claimed Kaum- || For the label tapes, the respondent claims the gate part ([asserts that the usable writing field 3e label is larger than

the emitted width of the label tape *

Hit Swisehenbescheid of 9 · MoTesber 1967 & at the department carried out that the sur specification of the protection request by the department submitted claim 1, originally. Revealed account and is sufficiently delimited from the Sntgegeiüialtangen and such a label tape ws = dsr by the Potoeeken tape known from the USA patent 2 825 166, by the label tape according to the British patent 957 589 is suggested "because the latter is in? Ig · 1 and 5 & ®n Fig. 2 and 3 of the utility model in dispute show similar forms only in connection with Hana strips smooth on both sides, which do not allow the control of an Itoaek and dispensing device. Port is also not the problem of loss-free punching The label tape should therefore suffice in terms of an inventive standard that is used as a sample object · It was also stated in the interim notification that it is irrelevant in this situation whether label tapes with a wave or zigzag shape are known as a border or not and whether the scanning is done with the help of τοη ζ · Β ·! Inherit or gentle wavy lines is more advantageous »because the respondent e I found a solution »which combines the requirement of the passion-free stanaens with a still sufficient control accuracy · This solution is therefore to be recognized as an inventive achievement.

The respondent responded to the interim decision on January 4th. ar 1968, received at the Patent Office on 5 · December 1968, a new claim 1 ναού five new ünteransprüche 2 submitted to 6, to replace the registered claims ·

The new claim 1 »whose features essentially consist of the Original claims 1 and 4 emerge, has the following wording

«Β -

1. Label tape with at least partially not running in the longitudinal direction of the tape msx control of the length of the feed S5.B »a .Brück- tmd dispenser, characterized in that £ at least one tape (11) designed as a continuous © Teraahnungslini © (6) is where the teeth and gaps between the teeth form congruent®! surfaces.

With regard to the further claims 2 only 6, reference is made to the defendant's pleading dated January 4, 1968

In another pleading voa April 16, 1968, received by the Patent Office on April 17, 1968, the respondent made it clear "that the utility model object is a label tape" that consists of a base and self-adhesive labels attached to it in a row, with / which neither the T esaband Mt Zackenschnitt still have something to do with the velvet ribbons mentioned and has submitted the following new claim:

1 · label strip "consists thereon adhesive from a backing tape and in series self-adhesive label and which is provided at least one of its Händer with indentations or recesses, corresponding in AEEN label intervals intervals are mounted and serve sur control of Stikettenvorschubes in Etikettenbedruck- or label output devices" characterized characterized in that at least one edge (11) is designed as a continuously running Terzahnungslinie (6), in which the cream heads and tooth gaps form congruent surfaces and the tooth gaps are arranged on the leading edge delimitation (12) of the labels at right angles to the band-ISngsrich- "tang .

- 8a -

further details will lie on the content of the Submissions and reference to the interim notification

In the oral hearing, the respondent requested that the dispute must be maintained with the main claim received at the German Patent Office on April 17, 1968 "but with the restriction that the feature" on the boundary lines of the labels ¹¹ running at right angles to the longitudinal direction of the tape in the The generic term (line 4) should be taken, that the words "and the tooth gaps ¹ * and in the last line ^ are arranged" should also be deleted in the third from last line and the word "together" after the word "tooth gaps" in the fourth from the last line "should be set ·

This main claim should be followed by claims 2 - 6 in the version of January 4, 1968 (Bl, 71/72 of the file).

The applicant has also made restrictions with regard to this Protection claim your request for full; = maintain deletion,!

Grounds for discontinuation t

The solution request based on §§ 1 Paragraph 2.7 Paragraph 1 Utility Mister Act is justified

It is first to be checked whether the new vision claim 1 last submitted by the respondent is to be regarded as allowable is · The protection claim 1 is supported by the original protection claims 1 and 4.

^: X.

Subject of the eye protection claim received on April 17, 1968 the dispute utility model is a

Label tape, which consists of a backing tape and self-adhesive labels adhering to it in a row and which is provided with indentations or recesses on at least one of its tapes, which are attached at the distance between the labels and are used to control the label feed in label printing or label dispensing devices »
whose Rauraforsa is characterized in that at least one hand (11) is designed as a continuously running third tooth line (6) in which the tooth tips and tooth gaps form congruent surfaces and the tooth gaps are arranged on the boundary lines (12) of the labels that run at right angles to the tape Mngsrlchtung are,

This protection claim 1 with the submission of 4 January Claims 2 to 6 filed in 1968 follow.

In the generic term of the new protection claim 1 submitted by the respondent, based on the ÜSA patent 2 636 297, a label tape was assumed that consists of a ÜxrSerlageband and self-adhesive labels adhering to it in a row. In deviation from this, the official proposal was based on a label tape in general, although both label tapes are designed to control the label feed in the corresponding devices by means of appropriate edge design. ■

- 10 -

- 10-

Development of SRAR task by the applicant during the oral Terhan & again raised linwand "Dab this no 8teuorteehnisch @ s problem BOtulexn had lain only the problem of lossless Stansena based tonnte not be accepted because the description of the StreitgebrauohöKttsters bei® not only to remedy the disadvantages Manufacture το »controllable label tapes by accepting material losses sra can be seen, as the applicant tried to explain» but also the elimination of the disadvantages for controlling the gate push in corresponding devices clearly s «B» on page 2 at the end of the 1 * paragraph of the description of the dispute register .will. From the utility model documents it is therefore easy to see that the task is to design an itUcette tape in such a way that it can be produced quickly and easily, both without the need for material and easily scannable.

The respondent has found a solution for this »which one the requirement of lossless punching with a still sufficient Tax-accurate & eit connects; it is irrelevant » whether the scanning of labels tapes with the help of notches » as for example according to the French patent specification 980 451 (Pig · 4) or with already wave valley phone »as s.B · according to the French patent specification 1 357 785 ißg · 1) to« · even more gentle Wavy line »as s.B, in the case of the dispute usage pattern» more advantageous is · The relevant statements by the applicant at the hearing are therefore absurd.

The protection claim 1 of April 16, 1968 in the fit on which the resolution is based is aea · - '"-' ■ ■

The numerous bat counter-holdings are merely unsuccessful features

known as ssu see "- D & s state of 3 eebnik can awar - recognize that it was known before dea Ammeldet & g of the armed utility model" Working _fl least one band of Stl2cettenbaEu3.es .with on a base adhesive Self adhesive €> beetiketten _e with indentations or recesses JMX provided ^ cf. · ss * B * French Patent 1 35? 785 * (Pig. 4) · Ss can not ineTaen followed therein ₉ that hereby the formation of a Etikettenbanäran & it as a continuously .verlaufend-e jedotih the applicant? ersahnungslinie on the day of the announcement of the controversial use sample. mm belonged to the state of the art and therefore this feature in the generic term of the schata claim 1 su riBism & a sei TIg, 1 wi & 5 of British patent specification 957 589 aiif the inner surface of a label bendee with smooth hand stripes arranged cutting line ^ "What is not ^! In a handli never can be the case of a label © ntsandes äev ^{»the expression line ß} contlmiierlich Terlaisf ende premonition line" in the fit of the Schutsanspruehes 1 on which the decision is based was no longer used »Me Atisdruokweise

"In am. registered documents of the use, however, that it is here, among other things, a label tape edge with toothed pins and cream gaps, which must form congruent surfaces * la with regard to the fact that through the dl © fraas ^ sisohe yateatechrift t 282 636» ^v the generic term is a state of the art "sragrundeliegt continue also recorded in Schutsansprueh of 16 · April 1968 last feature about the arrangement of the sur Itikettenbandlängsrichtung perpendicular boundary lines of the labels become known '. been swar the Torschlag the Antragsgegnerln to follow in ₉ this feature take in the generic term su.

With the measures of the cited ^ ÜSA patents 734 575 ^ 2 825 166, 2 874 499, 2 589 168/5 033 417 t of

et patent 93 BST ₉ of British patent 957 589 Ad of German Auslegeschrift 1 064 868 can

- 12

- 12 -

The problem posed cannot be solved »because these references do not succeed in the dispute? "already recognized" status of the Siechnik and can therefore for the assessment of the reliability of the dispute utility model! "remain" taken into account "

IT ·.

The progress of the dispute usage master item is also to be taken for granted

The objection of the applicant "that the oil control of the 3 gate lifts in the arrangement look almost wave-troughed bookings according to the French patent specification 1 357 785 (Pig · 1) is not as effective" as with the 3cerbfc5riaig.jia ünbuahtnagen after the ^! French patent specification 980 45t "and consequently the undulating formation of the belt in a pin belt after the dispute" is less of a need for one less "specific control 4es gate push requires ^ is not suitable" to shake the port step of the utility model in dispute} even if the asserted differences in given the control accuracy of the feed duroh di © lorsigebung üqt bulges, "so this is © differences measured on the Torteil * that the ait such welienförad- gen Eaadlinien with dental & öpfen vsaä ^ ahnlilc ^ s" to each other. ■■ congruent XISHmbl form , trained Eti ersSglichen & ettenb & X of the lossless making still _t so low ₉ that they ausau- at \ #eitem not de "associated Torteil -. same _f because DI® übliehen BtikettenMnder used veraögen with previously to control Awaken Belt-omen (sB after Type of .. ■ llg _o 6 of the USA patent specification 784 "375)" £ * or a lossless "■ manufacture of Etilcet tenbäadesm are not suitable. Incidentally · also üer objection the applicant is dex control terms "^ accuracy band of wave-like Ausbuchtungeforaen a label invalidated"'deb already one-Ü.lliarden such labels produced and consumed-have · Uiese Satsache' speaks against that by ₉ this training is not sufficient

- 13 -

~ f5 -

de control accuracy © rssieXt is sumal the applicant ·: ■ apparently also enjoyed the work of the Streltgebrauehsimieter (fOTletung) «" TorteiXbaft let the - ■ wavy edge formation won Itlkettebäsdeim »since these are more easily transferred to an output device than those with feSxmen echaftentigen & erfe @ & Im litikettigiibaadsraad · Thus germinated the objection of the iatragst @ llerln Mnslehtllch lack of progress ά @ ® StreltgelüJÄUGhsaiisterßi iaioht take action ·

The subject of the detective mess finally indicates that I am looking for them for the GeteaÄohasrasterechuts «requiredXIalie invention height on ·

From the Bach system of a division of areas " waä dem Bach: ^B Stansereltechnlk ⁰ let it be since" Tahren Tor dem, ijMommunikationsag de © Streitgetaauehsmisters "already helcaimt, for the purpose of" Terlust- _ free Stansems levels or bands Ib Sinsseiforsen seamlessly laid out However, this Mteraturstellen is not clear "tHe who punched in this Weis © t>eha" Bfeenen or tapes should be stm making EtlfcettenMndern Terwendet · Although according lnga "be the application ^ egnerin imter Hinwels sB mxf the ÜSAPtthIf 2,589,168 d lfl S ^ IA

ÜSA ~ Pstent8ChrIft 2 589 168 the lucrative rods, the arrangement of wave cutting lines and the control of chain links by arranging notches in at least one edge of the label tape " when it was common to know the urgent need to manufacture an Italian chain "that both Terlustfrei hergesteil;? and there ^ ei fite a sufficient accuracy Steller the advance in Ausgafeegeräten which is to sum registration day of Streitgeteauchssriieter ^ despite the" Working j knew prior fechnite the relevant industry carelessly i

at the above- mentioned possibilities; passed * just the ones. ? | It is a proof that the production is a © 3 Eti— .-. Ii chain tape according to the Streltgefer smoke pattern »with at least ■ | the one edge has two tooth tips and tooth gaps »which form alternate dectomgsglelche planes» provided »was not really new ,

- 14 -

- 14

also, meh was nearby, so dall the Bauatform also the invention necessary for its charm show height · -. '

But it was also not close at hand for the Stansfaehisann asked "the detriment-free dismantling of a flShe also for the production of labels and the E & t foa exchanges formed" edges to graze "also proves" the is. be sisohen Patent 980 45t is "solved - PkteatschrlTt 2 Jg2§" 437 # _f wotei after 30 years labels cut from a web wexden the Prolsleia of Afeführens the Sckenausschnitte * as ettenbänder even when & m Eti &.! "after the fringe ^ should »that the corners of all the seam strips are sucked off» ie · »one stayed with this emphasized principle until the application of the dispute brewery pattern» trotadea the problem of the lack of passion was known per se. 1954 to »as the applicant under gate position of the" Terlcaufsinformatioii. Sr · 1i / 63 ⁿ clarify the search · "" ~ "——— ^ - ~ - ^ - —---- »« * «- ^» ^^

Obviously it took a goal judgment in the professional circles to be overcome »as the opponent has convincingly demonstrated» according to which the use of wavy lines as a tax margin; to label bands was not considered sufficiently precise "but actually this- Baehteil rmx apparently over control edges with notches" because .gewisse Itoleransen now ■ einiaal_JLa purchase are to take "What profiled but the Verwendimg a gesäB Torlage a sworn door security Torbenutsten Alze ¥ to Manufacture τοη on the hand corrugated. Ribbons, sB "in order to be able to produce velvet ribbons Yerliilst-free" bsw · τοη tooth scissors "in order to produce belts with 2igzag edge loss-free" concerns "bo this does not lead to the knowledge of the dispute master: herrorj according to which it sum taxes, from EtilcetteabSndera on such Y @ pleasure-free produced, wellsnf ^ rsdge. "or sickaack-shaped hand lines askoEtat» w & a Etifeettenband to enable a

μ 15 -

Loss-free production with a ban & line guaranteeing sufficient control accuracy connects "Me use of be" _% known profiled fulling or ^ & imsscherea, thus does not convey a clear doctrine for © in technical banding.

So far! Eesabäader sat with at least one »kit bulges provided sand geiaäS d @ a submitted Erospektea of Beiersdorf Aß are manufactured »the same applies to the manufacture Tone velvet ribbons has been said «.

The ijitragstelxsria xiioht can be followed in "that it eicii" feßi the transference of the t? Ekatm & B / ¥ erliistfr © ien Stanaens according to the USA Patent No. 2 589 168 of one path has another, which consists only of different material "only around one Substance exchange acts for the Streitgebraucassaaster- "concerns a label bath alt mm control of the Etlkettenyorschnba serving: Eandlinie _f while the ÜSA-patent a band of strengthening sections a» whose smooth bands do not sulssssn the control of a device *

Therefore, it is not true sm ₉ DAB single borrowed AELE known natural properties of a known compound for a known purpose "known 3? Applied orm" are "

Xm rest could SchutafäMgkeit of Geerauchsmustera already then be affirmed when zvls producing a known .Eaumform a new substance is used to me "without that- the lorm of the object needs to change ''

After all, therefore, the BeachluB 'underlying protection claim is 1 approved

The subordinate claims 2 to 6 on which the resolution is based relate to expedient further developments of the subject matter of protective clause 1, which are neither to be regarded as obvious nor to be considered as plausible

- 16 -

-te- V ^: ■ ■■: ■;

Sell> 3tverstj;> üdllc: akelten represent εο that they are in Yerfcindimg with the Sdxatsasapvaclx 1 ebexdCSEtUe as .geilte! »*» asgeseken

It must therefore be stated * that the argument in dispute ia. Rahaea dex Stillosotoag opposite dea toä der JLntragsteUeri upright state & ex feötoik isäiatliche EriOrdernisse der Sdxatefälilgkelt Masichtliali novelty #? Ort ^ hritt tind height, so thatS no. Anla8 approved ». this in full range see below

The costantsc & eidwag follows && ö I 9 Alis · 5 Sate. 2 6ta £ in connection with § 92 ZPO · you ÄaftellTiag d @ r costs © atspriclit dem Degree of defeat ^ of the bar "/ - -

On the attached © Bee & tsmitteXljelelmmg wiyd reference genoaiaeiu

II ges · Saub © gez # Blaoitet & tei gea

.. ■■■ '■ -. ■■■.'. ■■ ^; "" Hd

Annex e. ■ - -. "■ ..-" - ■■ ■■ ■ "■ -. 'Jf MiBeI, GlauIiS · 25 new ■ "■ '; ■■ - -.

■ ■ '■■■ ■' ■■ - ■■■■■ .if

Claims (8)

RÄ 451768-27-8.65-- - β protective test Label tape with at least partially not running in the longitudinal direction edge for controlling the length of the feed, e.g. of a printing and dispensing device, characterized in that at least one edge (11) as a continuous:
forms is. continuously running toothing line (6) 2. Label tape according to claim 1, characterized in that the toothing line (6) is provided as a wavy line (7). * '■. A wide band cut out label strips according to claim 1 and 2, characterized in that the 3ο ^From: labels offset (4) of adjacent label strips (1,2,3) are arranged to each other and the ^ wave crests (9) of a strip (1) in the wave troughs (10) of the other band 2 lie. '< Label tape according to Claims 1 to 5, characterized in that the labels (4) of one collar (1) are coextensive with one another and with the labels (4) of the adjacent tape (2). _4th 5ο label tape according to claim 1 to 4, characterized in that that the wave crests (9) an.den edges (11) in the middle between the two straight and parallel ones The boundary lines (12) of the label (4) lie, 6. Label tape according to claim 5, characterized in that that the wavelength is within a label J & t length (15) is housed. -Jr Label tape according to claim 1, characterized in that the serration line (6) is a zigzag line (8) is trained, < 8. Label tape according to claim 5 to 7, characterized in that the widest point (13) 'in the middle of the label and the narrowest point (14) are on the boundary lines (12) of the label (A) .