DE102016222657A1 - Process for the preparation of polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers from formaldehyde and methanol in aqueous solutions - Google Patents

Abstract

Process for the preparation of polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers containing ≥3 oxymethylene units (OMEs) comprising the steps of: (i) feeding formaldehyde, methanol and water into a reactor R and converting to a reaction mixture comprising formaldehyde, water, methylene glycol, polyoxymethylene glycols, methanol, hemiformals, Methylal (OME) and polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether (OME), (ii) feeding the reaction mixture into a reactive distillation column K1 and separating it into a low boiler fraction F1 comprising formaldehyde, water, methylene glycol, polyoxymethylene glycols, methanol, hemiformals, methylal (OME) and polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether with 2 to 3 oxymethylene Units (OME) and a high boiler fraction F2 containing polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether with more than two oxymethylene units (OME).

Description

The invention relates to a process for the preparation of polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers (OME) with ≥ 3 oxymethylene units of formaldehyde and methanol in aqueous solution.

OMEs represent a homologous series of the general formula CH ₃ O (CH ₂ O) _n CH ₃ , where n is a number ≥ 2. Like the homologous series parent molecule, the methylal CH ₃ O (CH ₂ O) _n CH ₃ (n = 1), are the OME acetals. They are prepared by the reaction of methanol with aqueous formaldehyde in the presence of an acidic catalyst. Like other acetals, they are stable under neutral or alkaline conditions but are attacked by acids. By hydrolysis they are reacted in the presence of water in a first step to hemiacetals and methanol. In a second step, the hemiacetals are converted to formaldehyde and methanol. Hereinafter, polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers having n oxymethylene units are abbreviated to OMN _n .

On a laboratory scale, OMEs are prepared by heating polyoxymethylene glycol or paraformaldehyde with methanol in the presence of traces of sulfuric acid or hydrochloric acid at temperatures of 150 to 180 ° C and reaction times of 12 to 15 hours, as described in US Pat Reuss G., Disteldorf W., Grundler O., Hilt A., Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim 1988 , This leads to decomposition reactions with the formation of carbon dioxide and the formation of dimethyl ether. With a paraformaldehyde or polyoxymethylene glycol to methanol ratio of 6: 1, polymers with n> 100, generally n = 300 to 500, are obtained. The products are washed with sodium sulfite solution and then fractionated by crystallization. The method of laboratory production is not directly transferable to the technical scale. The resulting product mixture is outside the range of application technology interesting applications.

OMEs are of interest, inter alia, as diesel fuel, as an absorbent for the separation of carbon dioxide from gas mixtures ( Burger J., Ströfer E., Hasse H. Production process for diesel fuel components poly (oxymethylene) dimethyl ethers from methane-based products by hierarchical optimization with varying model depth. Chemical Engineering Research and Design. 2013, 91 (12), 2648-2662 or as safe fuels for fuel cells (Devaux D., Yano H., Uchida H., Dubois JL, Watanabe M. Electro-oxidation of hydrolysed polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether on PtRu supported catalysts Electrochimica Acta. 2011, 56 (3)., 1460 -1465). Of particular interest is use as a diesel fuel since both OME of one chain length and OME blends containing OME of various chain lengths result in reduction of soot formation upon combustion. The OME of a chain length or the OME mixtures can be mixed with conventional diesel fuel or used directly (ie without admixture of conventional diesel fuel) as a fuel. If other oxygen-containing compounds, such as methanol, are added, they have considerable deficiencies. Such deficiencies include insufficient solubility in diesel fuel, unsatisfactory lower cetane number, and a reduced flash point of the resulting formulation. These deficiencies can be remedied in principle by further additives. However, this has the disadvantages that the costs of the preparation increase by the cost of the additives, the storage and mixing in the preparation of the preparation is complicated, and further the additives affect the firing properties of the preparation.

There is therefore a considerable need to produce OME economically and ecologically favorably in large quantities and in high purity.

US 2,449,469 describes a process in which methylal is heated with paraformaldehyde or a concentrated formaldehyde solution in the presence of sulfuric acid. This polyoxymethylene be obtained with 2 to 4 oxymethylene units per molecule. The examples relate to discontinuous processes, a scalable technical process is not disclosed.

US 5,746,785 describes the preparation of crude mixtures of OME having a molecular weight of 80 to 350, corresponding to 1 to 10 oxymethylene units (n = 1 to 10), by reaction of 1 part of methylal with 5 parts of CH ₂ O in the form of paraformaldehyde in the presence of 0 , 1 wt .-% of formic acid at a temperature of 150 to 240 ° C, or by reaction of 1 part of methanol with 3 parts of CH ₂ O in the form of paraformaldehyde at a temperature of 150 to 240 ° C. The crude mixtures obtained are added in amounts of 5 to 30 wt .-% of a diesel fuel. This forms two phases, the lighter phase is the finished, OME-containing product, which is supplied to the diesel pool. The use of the heavier phase is not described.

US 6,534,685 discloses the preparation of OME having 2 to 6 formaldehyde units in the molecule by reacting methylal with paraformaldehyde in the presence of trifluorosulfonic acid. With a selectivity of 94.8% OME with n = 2 to 5 are formed, with 49.6% of the dimer (n = 2) is obtained. The obtained OME are added in amounts of 4 to 11 wt .-% of a diesel fuel. Only the synthesis of OME is described, a scalable technical process is not disclosed.

US 6,392,102 describes the preparation of OME by reacting a feed stream containing methanol and formaldehyde obtained by oxidation of dimethyl ether in the presence of an acid catalyst and simultaneously separating the reaction products in a catalytic distillation column. In this case, methylal, methanol, water and OME are obtained. The process has the problem that water is hydrolyzed in the process under the process conditions OME and thus reduces the process yield.

The water is introduced in the process in two ways. The starting material formaldehyde is prepared in the technically realized and economically preferred process for the production of formaldehyde by oxidative dehydrogenation of methanol (reaction 1). This produces water as by-product. CH ₃ OH + (1/2) O ₂ → CH ₂ O + H ₂ O (Reaction 1)

Furthermore, water is also formed in the OME synthesis from formaldehyde and methanol. In such mixtures, the formaldehyde is almost completely chemically bound. Formaldehyde reacts in the presence of water to form methylene glycol HO- (CH ₂ O) -H (reaction 2) and polyoxymethylene glycols HO- (CH ₂ O) nH (reaction 3). CH ₂ O + H ₂ O ↔ HO- (CH ₂ O) -H (Reaction 2) HO- (CH ₂ O) _n -1 -H + CH ₂ O ↔ HO- (CH ₂ O) _n -H (Reaction 3)

Formaldehyde reacts with methanol to give the hemiacetals hemiformal OH- (CH ₂ O) -CH ₃ (reaction 4) and polyoxymethylene hemiformal HO- (CH ₂ O) _n CH ₃ (reaction 5). CH ₂ O + CH ₃ OH ↔ OH- (CH ₂ O) -CH ₃ (Reaction 4) OH- (CH ₂ O) _n-1 - CH ₃ + CH ₂ O ↔ OH- (CH ₂ O) n-CH ₃ (Reaction 5)

The unstable hemiacetals are also formed during the hydrolysis of OME. These hemiacetals reduce the flash point of the diesel fuel mixture and thus affect its quality. However, too low a flashpoint of the diesel fuel mixture causes the e.g. Specifications specified by relevant DIN standards are no longer met. However, hemiacetals are difficult to separate from the OME because of comparable boiling points. Since reactions 2 to 4 are reversible and proceed without the addition of a catalyst, the hemiacetals can potentially release formaldehyde, which is undesirable in the fuel.

In the in US 6,392,102 described method, the formaldehyde production is integrated into the OME synthesis in that formaldehyde is not produced by oxidative dehydrogenation of methanol - wherein generally aqueous formaldehyde solutions are obtained with a formaldehyde content of 20 to 60 wt .-% - but by oxidative dehydrogenation of dimethyl ether (reaction 6). CH ₃ OCH ₃ + O ₂ → 2 CH ₂ O + H ₂ O (Reaction 6)

Formaldehyde contents of> 60 wt .-% are achieved because dimethyl ether is obtained formally by dehydration of two methanol molecules (reaction 7) and a part of the water can be separated already in the production of dimethyl ether. 2 CH ₃ OH ↔ CH ₃ OCH ₃ + H ₂ O (Reaction 7)

Alternatively, a highly concentrated formaldehyde aqueous solution may also be prepared by diluting the aqueous solution as described in US Pat US 7,342,139 is described, concentrated and this concentrated solution is used. However, the principal problem of the method is not solved.

The procedure according to US 6,392,102 is technically complex and contains many returns. It includes reactive distillation, several heterogeneous catalytic reactors, distillation columns, absorption columns and a spray tower. This requires high development and investment costs as well as maintenance costs during operation.

The problems described above are avoided by using as in US 7,999,140 and WO 2006/045506 described, anhydrous is worked. This is achieved by the use of trioxane as the anhydrous formaldehyde-containing component which is reacted with methylal or dimethyl ether. However, the starting material trioxane is more expensive than formaldehyde, since the production of trioxane emanates in turn from formaldehyde as starting material. Thus, an additional process step is needed.

US 7,671,240 describes a process for preparing OME _{n = 3-5} by reacting formaldehyde with methanol in aqueous solution and subsequent work-up by distillation of the reaction mixture. However, the process described there has the following disadvantages: OME _{n = 3-5} undergo a total of three distillation columns and a phase separator to be separated from the remaining components of the reactor discharge. Due to the complexity of the reactive substance mixture, finding an operating point by optimally interconnecting all the devices is extremely demanding. The patent does not contain any examples describing such an operating point.

In particular, in Schmitz N., Friebel A., by Harbou E., Burger J., Hasse H., Liquid-liquid equilibrium in binary and tertiary mixtures containing formaldehyde, water, methanol, methylal, and poly (oxymethylene) dimethyl ether, Fluid Phase Equilibria. 2016 (425). 127 to 135 demonstrated that both methanol and formaldehyde have a strong solubilizing effect on the miscibility gap between OME and water. It must therefore be operated a high effort to lower the content of formaldehyde and methanol before the phase separator so far that the system decomposes into two liquid phases. If this decay does not take place, the procedure is obsolete.

According to the cited new state of the art, it is also shown that the separation of OME via the organic phase of the phase separator is not quantitative. A significant proportion of OME leaves the phase separator over the aqueous phase. This OME needs to be further worked up, which increases the complexity of the overall process and lowers the profitability.

Nevertheless, the production of OME from methanol and formaldehyde in aqueous solution has considerable advantages over the use of other starting materials.

Methanol is evolving into a marketed and abundant platform chemical. Olah (Olah GA, Goeppert A, Surya Prakash GK Beyond oil and gas: the methanol economy, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim 2011) has developed a scenario of how the world energy economy can be reorganized on the basis of synthesis gas and methanol. Synthesis gas can be produced conventionally on the basis of fossil fuels as well as on the basis of renewable energies. In the latter case z. For example, water is electrolytically cleaved using solar or geothermal electricity (Reaction 8). 3 H ₂ O → 3 H ₂ + (3/2) O ₂ (reaction 8)

Part of the hydrogen is converted into the synthesis unit carbon monoxide using carbon dioxide (reaction 9). CO ₂ + H ₂ ↔ CO + H ₂ O (Reaction 9)

Hydrogen and carbon monoxide are then reacted to form the platform chemicals methanol (reaction 10) and dimethyl ether (reaction 7), respectively. CO + 2H ₂ → CH ₃ OH (reaction 10)

Methanol is in liquid form under normal conditions and can therefore be easily handled and shipped. Methanol can be widely used as a platform chemical in the chemical industry.

Methanol is also the preferred feedstock for the conventional syntheses of formaldehyde, which are described in the literature ( Reuss G., Disteldorf W., Grundler O., Hilt A., Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim 1988 ) are described. These convert by oxidative dehydrogenation or by a two-way mechanism of oxidative dehydrogenation coupled with a non-oxidative dehydrogenation of methanol under kinetic control in formaldehyde. This inevitably always produces water in certain amounts (see reaction 1). In addition, the reactor effluent of the formaldehyde reactor is usually quenched with an excess of water in absorption columns. The product is an aqueous solution of formaldehyde, which in most cases is additionally stabilized with methanol.

US 2011/0313202 describes a process for preparing OME from aqueous formaldehyde solution and methanol. In the process, aqueous formaldehyde first partially reacts to form trioxane using an ionic liquid as a catalyst. The resulting mixture containing formaldehyde, trioxane and water is then reacted with methanol using a second ionic liquid as a catalyst to form OME. The reactor discharge from the second reactor is worked up by means of distillation and a phase separator. Disadvantages of the process are again the preparation of the intermediate trioxane and the use of ionic liquids as catalyst. This increases the complexity of the process. The use of ionic liquids represents an economic disadvantage because of their high prices. They must be recycled lossless, which is generally very expensive. Furthermore, as already stated, the optimal integration of the phase separator into the process is complex. It is also unclear whether traces and degradation products of the ionic liquid remain in the final product.

EP 2 987 781 describes a process for the production of OME from formaldehyde and methanol. The OMEs are removed from the reaction system in a two-phase system by means of an extractant. Preference is, as already in US 5,746,785 , Diesel fuel used as extractant. The water removal takes place from the aqueous phase of the two-phase system by means of, for example, adsorption on molecular sieves, drying with anhydrous salts or by a membrane process. A disadvantage of the process is the use of an additional extraneous external extractant, which may remain in traces in the OME. In addition, OME, as in the to the font shown, not quantitatively removed from the reaction system. This increases the process's return streams and reduces the economics of the process.

US 2014/0114093 describes a process for preparing polyoxymethylene dialkyl ethers, especially OME, in which OME is formed by reacting formaldehyde and methanol using an ionic liquid as the catalyst. The reaction mixture is then worked up by extraction and distillation. The water removal is carried out by evaporation of the water from the heavy catalyst-rich phase after extraction. Disadvantages of the process are, in turn, the use of an ionic liquid as catalyst and the use of external extruding agents.

US 2015/0094497 describes a process for the preparation of OME from aqueous formaldehyde solution and methanol. In this case, aqueous formaldehyde solution is first concentrated and dried by vacuum drying to solid paraformaldehyde. Paraformaldehyde then reacts with methanol using an ionic liquid as a catalyst to form OME. The reactor effluent is worked up by distillation and by extraction. A disadvantage of the process is the handling of the solid paraformaldehyde, the use of a non-process extractant, the use of ionic liquids as a catalyst and the complexity of the overall process consisting of concentration and drying of the aqueous formaldehyde solution, chemical reaction, extraction and distillation. In principle, it is understood by those skilled in the art that solids are to be avoided in processes because handling is difficult and expensive.

US 6,534,685 describes a liquid preparation of OME _{n = 2-5} and a diesel fuel mixture with the boiling range 150 ° C to 350 ° C. A disadvantage of this preparation is the use of OME only one chain length or of synthetic mixtures of OME of different chain lengths. This initially requires a costly distillative separation of the OME according to their chain length, without resulting in an additional benefit for the fuel mixture containing OME.

There are recent publications on OME in the scientific literature, most of which deal with the optimization of the reaction system. Schmitz et al. ( Schmitz N., Homberg F., Berje J., Burger J., Hasse H. Chemical equilibrium of the synthesis of poly (oxymethylene) dimethyl ethers from formaldehydes and methanol in aqueous solutions. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2015, 54 (25). 6409-6417 . Schmitz N., Burger J., Ströfer, E., Hasse, H. From methanol to the oxygenated diesel fuel poly (oxymethylene) dimethyl ether: An assessemnt of the production costs. Fuel. 2016 (185), 67 - 72 ; give an overview of the literature and the economy. Schmitz et al. (Schmitz N., Homberg F., Berje J., Burger J., Hasse H. Chemical equilibrium of the synthesis of poly (oxymethylene) dimethyl ethers from formaldehyde and methanol in aqueous solutions. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2015, 54 ( 25) 6409-6417 .) also investigate the chemical balance of OME synthesis from aqueous formaldehyde and methanol. It is described that the chain length distribution of the OME in the reactor effluent is determined by the chemical equilibrium.

The OME reactor is dimensioned so that the chemical equilibrium is largely achieved. Broadly means here that the deviation of the concentration of each OME oligomer of its respective equilibrium concentration is <30%, preferably <10%, most preferably <5%. However, it is also possible to dimension the reactor so that the chemical equilibrium is largely not reached and the oligomer distribution of the OME is kinetically controlled ( Schmitz N., Burger J., Hasse H. Reaction kinetics of the formation of poly (oxymethylene) dimethyl ethers from formaldehyde and methanol in aqueous solutions. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2015, 54 (50). 12553 to 12560 .). The oligomer distribution in the product OME is largely determined by the conduct of the reaction in the reactor. An economically optimal production of OME _{n = 3-6} as a fuel additive is characterized in that the chain length distribution of the oligomers in the range n = 3 to 6 in the fuel within <15% deviation, preferably within <10%, most preferably <5% Deviation, their chain length distribution in the reactor output corresponds. Subsequent separation and workup steps cut from the OME fraction of the reactor output preferably only OME oligomers to low (n <3) or to large chain length (n> 6) and lead them back. These oligomers, which are too small or too large in chain length, have a negative influence on the specification characteristics of OME and the preparations produced therefrom due to their physical properties. Such negative influences are z. B. too low a flash point at low chain lengths or too high a cold filter plugging point at too large chain lengths in the mix with diesel fractions. If oligomers with n.sup.3 and / or n.sup.6 are to remain in the product on the basis of speciation specifications or standardizations, their proportion can be adjusted via the acutance of the separation and working-up steps and recycling or by admixture.

This makes OME a "product by process" because the reactor predetermines the specification for oligomer distribution. The following separation and work-up steps finally set the specification, since excessively high and too low oligomers are cut off from OME and recycled in the process.

Similarly, Burger et al. ( Burger J., Ströfer E., Hasse H., Production process for diesel fuel components poly (oxymethylene) dimethyl ethers from methane-based products by hierarchical optimization with varying model depth. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2013, 91 (12), 2648-2662 ) for a thermodynamically determined idealized overall process for the OME synthesis from trioxane and methylal a natural oligomer distribution of OME found from OME ₃ : 0.43 g / g, OME ₄ : 0.34 g / g, OME ₅ : 0.22 g / g OME ₆ : <0.01 g / g.

Thus, there is still a need for processes for the production of OME, starting from the commercially available, inexpensive and readily available in large quantities standard products formaldehyde and methanol in aqueous solution. In particular, in view of their importance as diesel fuel components, there is a need for the selective and economical production of OME with 3 to 6 oxymethylene units (OME _{n = 3-6} ).

The object of the invention is therefore to provide an improved process for the preparation of OME _{n = 3-6} , which starts from the readily available starting materials formaldehyde and methanol.

1. (i) Einspeisung von Formaldehyd, Methanol und Wasser in einen Reaktor R und Umsetzung zu einem Reaktionsgemisch enthaltend Formaldehyd, Wasser, Methylenglykol (MG), Polyoxymethylenglykole (MG_n), Methanol, Hemiformale (HF), Methylal (OME_n=1) und Polyoxymethylendimethylether (OME_n>1);
2. (ii) Einspeisung des Reaktionsgemisches in eine Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 und Auftrennung in eine Leichtsiederfraktion F1 enthaltend Formaldehyd, Wasser, Methylenglykol (MG), Polyoxymethylenglykole (MG_n), Methanol, Hemiformale (HF), Methylal (OME_n=1) und Polyoxymethylendimethylether mit 2 bis 3 Oxymethylen-Einheiten (OME_n=2-3) und eine Schwersiederfraktion F2, enthaltend im Wesentlichen Polyoxymethylendimethylether mit mehr als zwei Oxymethylen-Einheiten (OME_n≥3).

The object is achieved by a process for the preparation of polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers having ≥ 3 oxymethylene units (OME _n≥3 ) with the steps (i) and (ii):

1. (i) feeding formaldehyde, methanol and water into a reactor R and converting to a reaction mixture containing formaldehyde, water, methylene glycol (MW), polyoxymethylene glycols (MW _n ), methanol, hemiformal (HF), methylal (OME _{n = 1} ) and Polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether (OME _{n> 1} );
2. (ii) feeding the reaction mixture into a reactive distillation column K1 and separating it into a low boiler fraction F1 comprising formaldehyde, water, methylene glycol (MW), polyoxymethylene glycols (MW _n ), methanol, hemiformal (HF), methylal (OME _{n = 1} ) and polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether with 2 to 3 oxymethylene units (OME _{n = 2-3} ) and a high boiler fraction F2 containing essentially polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether with more than two oxymethylene units (OME _n≥3 ).

• (iii) Einspeisung der Schwersiederfraktion F2 in eine Destillationskolonne K2 und Auftrennung in eine Produktfraktion F3 enthaltend Polyoxymethylendimethylether mit 3 bis 6 Oxymethylen-Einheiten (OME_n=3-6) und eine Schwersiederfraktion F4 enthaltend Polyoxymethylendimethylether mit mehr als 6 Oxymethylen-Einheiten (OME_n>6);
• (iv) gegebenenfalls Rückführung der Schwersiederfraktion F4 in den Reaktor R.

Preference is given to a process for the preparation of polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers having 3 to 6 oxymethylene units (OME _{n = 3-6} ) with the additional steps (iii) and (iv):

• (iii) feeding the high boiler fraction F2 into a distillation column K2 and separating it into a product fraction F3 comprising polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether having 3 to 6 oxymethylene units (OME _{n = 3-6} ) and a high boiler fraction F4 containing polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether with more than 6 oxymethylene units (OME _{n > 6} );
• (iv) optionally recycling the high boiler fraction F4 to the reactor R.

• (v) Einspeisung der Leichtsiederfraktion F1 in einen Apparat zur Wasserabtrennung und Abtrennung von Wasser oder einer wasserreichen Fraktion F6, wobei ein wasserarmer Strom F5 erhalten wird;
• (vi) gegebenenfalls Rückführung des wasserarmen Stroms F5 in den Reaktor.

Preferably, the methods defined above also include step (v), in particular steps (v) and (vi):

• (v) feeding the low boiler fraction F1 into an apparatus for separating water and separating water or a water-rich fraction F6 to obtain a low-water stream F5;
• (vi) optionally, recycling the low-water stream F5 to the reactor.

The process according to the invention, which was found after intensive research, surprisingly solves the abovementioned fundamental problems arising in an OME preparation process starting from the educts methanol and formaldehyde in aqueous solution. After the reactor, both new and conventional separation steps are introduced and cleverly combined so that an economically and environmentally beneficial process results.

• • Katalysatoren nur in fester Phase vorliegen und damit einfach von dem fluiden Reaktionsmedium getrennt werden können;
• • alle anderen Stoffe außer den Katalysatoren stets nur in fluiden Phasen als Gas bzw. Flüssigkeit vorliegen;
• • auf die Einführung von zusätzlichen Hilfsstoffen zur Katalyse, Extraktion oder Stofftrennung verzichtet wird;
• • nach dem OME-Reaktor eine spezielle Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 eingeführt ist, in der die OME der Kettenlänge n ≥ 3 vom Reaktoraustrag abgetrennt werden, wobei eine Leichtsiederfraktion verbleibt;
• • die Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 üblicher Bauart ist. Als trennwirksame Einbauten werden verwendet entweder Böden, Packungen oder Füllkörper;
• • der Druck in der Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 zwischen 0,2 bar und 5 bar, bevorzugt zwischen 0,5 bar und 4 bar, besonders bevorzugt zwischen 1 bar und 3 bar, beträgt;
• • die Kopftemperatur in der Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 zwischen 25°C und 125°C beträgt, bevorzugt zwischen 45°C und 115°C beträgt, besonders bevorzugt zwischen 65°C und 105°C beträgt;
• • die Sumpftemperatur in der Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 zwischen 110°C und 255°C beträgt, bevorzugt zwischen 140°C und 240°C beträgt, besonders bevorzugt zwischen 170°C und 225°C beträgt;
• • der Durchmesser der Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 durch den Durchsatz der Kolonne bestimmt wird. Die Berechnung erfolgt nach den dem Fachmann bekannten Methoden. Der Durchsatz der Kolonne skaliert mit der Kapazität der OME Anlage;
• • die Höhe der Kolonne zwischen 10 und 40 theoretischen Trennstufen, bevorzugt zwischen 15 und 30 theoretischen Trennstufen, besonders bevorzugt zwischen 20 und 25 theoretischen Trennstufen ist. Die Umrechnung auf die Kolonnenhöhe in Metern erfolgt für jede der beschriebenen trennwirksamen Einbauten (Böden, Packungen, Füllkörper) nach den dem Fachmann bekannten Methoden.
• • unterhalb des Zulaufs die Höhe der Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 zwischen 3 und 20 theoretischen Trennstufen, bevorzugt zwischen 4 und 15 theoretischen Trennstufen, besonders bevorzugt zwischen 5 und 10 theoretischen Trennstufen beträgt. Die Umrechnung auf die Höhe des Zulaufs in Metern erfolgt für jede der beschriebenen trennwirksamen Einbauten (Böden, Packungen, Füllkörper) nach den dem Fachmann bekannten Methoden;
• • das Rücklaufverhältnis in der Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 mindestens 0,20 g/g, beispielsweise mindestens 0,30 g/g oder mindestens 0,40 g/g beträgt;
• • das Verhältnis aus Volumen der Flüssigkeit im Bereich zwischen Zulauf und Sumpfabzug inklusive möglicher Seitenreaktoren und des Sumpfes zum Volumenstrom des Sumpfabzugs in der Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 mindestens 10 min beträgt; dieses Verhältnis kann auch mehr als 15 min oder mehr als 30 min betragen;
• • die Reaktivdestillationskolonne und deren Einbauten aus üblichen Materialien bestehen, bevorzugt ist Stahl;
• • der pH-Wert in der Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 im Bereich zwischen Zulauf und Sumpfabzug, inklusive möglicher Seitenreaktoren und des Sumpfes, zwischen 4 und 14, bevorzugt zwischen 5 und 14, besonders bevorzugt zwischen 7 und 14 ist;
• • der pH-Wert in der Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 im Bereich zwischen Zulauf und Kopfabzug keine wesentliche Rolle spielt;
• • die Regelung des pH-Wertes in der Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1, falls der pH-Wert zu niedrig ist, im Bereich zwischen Zulauf und Sumpfabzug durch eine Laugedosierung erfolgt, bevorzugt durch eine Dosierung von Natriummethanolat in methanolischer Lösung;
• • der Zulauf zu den Kolonnen sowohl flüssig als auch gasförmig oder beides sein kann. Nassdampf ist daher ebenfalls möglich;
• • nach der Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 eine nachgeschaltete Destillationskolonne K2 üblicher Bauart installiert ist, die OME der Kettenlänge n ≥ 3 in das Produkt OME_n=3-6 und eine schwersiedende Fraktion OME_n>6 trennt;
• • die schwersiedende Fraktion der Kolonne K2 in den OME-Reaktor zurückgeführt wird;
• • die Wasserabtrennung aus der Leichtsiederfraktion in Kopplung mit einer nachgeschalteten Trenneinheit geschieht;
• • die Trenneinheit zur Abtrennung des Wassers eine dem Fachmann bekannte Einrichtung, bevorzugt eine Pervaporations-, Dampfpermeations- oder Adsorptionsanlage, ist;
• • der wasserarme Strom aus der Wasserabtrennung in den Reaktor zurückgeführt wird;
• • optional der wasserreiche Strom aus der Wasserabtrennung enthaltend neben Wasser auch Formaldehyd, Methanol, Methylal, und wenig OME_n=2-3 weiter aufgearbeitet wird;
• • die optionale Aufarbeitung des wasserreichen Stroms aus der Wasserabtrennung derart gestaltet ist, dass Methanol und Methylal als Kopfprodukt einer Destillationskolonne K3 gewonnen werden und in den OME Reaktor zurückgeführt werden und das Sumpfprodukt enthaltend Wasser, Formaldehyd und wenig OME_n=2-3 vorzugsweise in eine Formaldehyd-Anlage zurückgeführt wird;
• • die wässrige Lösung aus Formaldehyd und Methanol als Zulaufstrom dem Reaktor zugeführt wird,
• • Abgasströme aus den verschiedenen Verfahrensschritten in eine Formaldehyd-Anlage zurückgeführt werden können,
• • das Verfahren „auf der grünen Wiese“ außerhalb eines konventionellen Standortes errichtet und betrieben werden kann, aber vorzugsweise im direkten Verbund mit einer Formaldehyd-Anlage betrieben wird. Dabei ist es nicht notwendig, dass die Formaldehyd-Anlage die gesamte benötigte Menge an Formaldehyd zur OME-Synthese zur Verfügung stellt, sie sollte aber in der Lage sein, die verdünnten Rückführströme aus der OME-Anlage zur stofflichen Verwertung aufzunehmen;
• • das Verfahren im Verbund mit anderen Verfahren an einem Verbundstandort errichtet und betrieben werden kann, bevorzugt im Verbund mit einer Methanol- und Formaldehyd-Anlage und/oder einer Raffinerie, bevorzugt im Verbund mit einer Formaldehyd-Anlage, ganz besonders bevorzugt im Verbund mit einer Formaldehyd-Anlage, die nach dem Silberkontaktverfahren arbeitet. Alternativ können die Edukte ganz oder anteilig über eine Pipeline, Schiffe oder andere Logistikwege bereitgestellt werden und die Produkte entsprechend verschifft werden;
• • das hergestellte Produkt in z.B. den oben erwähnten Anwendungen eingesetzt werden kann, wobei es insbesondere alleine oder anteilig als Dieselkraftstoff Verwendung finden kann und wobei die anteilige Einbringung in andere Dieselkraftstoffe oder deren Mischungen durch statisches oder dynamisches Mischen in dem Fachmann bekannten Einrichtungen erfolgt.

Advantageous embodiments of the method are characterized in that

• • Catalysts are only in solid phase and thus can be easily separated from the fluid reaction medium;
• • all substances except the catalysts are always present only in fluid phases as gas or liquid;
• • the introduction of additional auxiliaries for catalysis, extraction or separation is dispensed with;
• • after the OME reactor, a special reactive distillation column K1 is introduced, in which the OME of chain length n ≥ 3 are separated from the reactor effluent, leaving a low boiler fraction;
• • The reactive distillation column K1 conventional design. As separating internals are used either soils, packs or packing;
• The pressure in the reactive distillation column K1 is between 0.2 bar and 5 bar, preferably between 0.5 bar and 4 bar, more preferably between 1 bar and 3 bar;
• The head temperature in the reactive distillation column K1 is between 25 ° C and 125 ° C, preferably between 45 ° C and 115 ° C, more preferably between 65 ° C and 105 ° C;
• • the bottom temperature in the reactive distillation column K1 is between 110 ° C and 255 ° C, preferably between 140 ° C and 240 ° C, more preferably between 170 ° C and 225 ° C;
• • The diameter of the reactive distillation column K1 is determined by the throughput of the column. The calculation takes place according to the methods known to the person skilled in the art. The throughput of the column scales with the capacity of the OME plant;
• The height of the column is between 10 and 40 theoretical plates, preferably between 15 and 30 theoretical plates, more preferably between 20 and 25 theoretical plates. The conversion to the column height in meters is carried out for each of the described separation-effective internals (trays, packings, packing) according to the methods known in the art.
• • Below the inlet, the height of the reactive distillation column K1 is between 3 and 20 theoretical plates, preferably between 4 and 15 theoretical plates, more preferably between 5 and 10 theoretical plates. The conversion to the height of the feed in meters is carried out for each of the described separating internals (trays, packings, packing) according to the methods known in the art;
• The reflux ratio in the reactive distillation column K1 is at least 0.20 g / g, for example at least 0.30 g / g or at least 0.40 g / g;
• • the ratio of the volume of the liquid in the area between inlet and bottom draw including possible side reactors and the sump to the volume flow of the bottom draw in the Reactive distillation column K1 is at least 10 minutes; this ratio may also be more than 15 minutes or more than 30 minutes;
• • the reactive distillation column and its internals consist of conventional materials, preferably steel;
• The pH in the reactive distillation column K1 is in the range between inlet and bottom draw, including possible side reactors and the bottom, between 4 and 14, preferably between 5 and 14, particularly preferred between 7 and 14;
• The pH value in the reactive distillation column K1 does not play a significant role in the region between feed and top take-off;
• • the regulation of the pH in the reactive distillation column K1, if the pH is too low, in the range between inlet and bottom draw by a Laugedosierung, preferably by a dosage of sodium methoxide in methanolic solution;
• • the feed to the columns can be both liquid and gaseous or both. Wet steam is therefore also possible;
• • after the reactive distillation column K1 a downstream distillation column K2 conventional design is installed, the OME of chain length n ≥ 3 in the product OME _{n = 3-6} and a high-boiling fraction OME _{n> 6} separates;
• • the high-boiling fraction of the column K2 is returned to the OME reactor;
• The removal of water from the low-boiling fraction takes place in combination with a downstream separation unit;
• The separation unit for separating off the water is a device known to the person skilled in the art, preferably a pervaporation, vapor permeation or adsorption plant;
• • the low-water stream from the water separation is returned to the reactor;
• • optionally the water-rich stream from the water separation containing besides water also formaldehyde, methanol, methylal, and little OME _{n = 2-3 is} further worked up;
• • the optional work-up of the water-rich stream from the water separation is designed such that methanol and methylal are recovered as the top product of a distillation column K3 and returned to the OME reactor and the bottom product containing water, formaldehyde and little OME _{n = 2-3} preferably in one Formaldehyde plant is recycled;
• The aqueous solution of formaldehyde and methanol is fed as feed stream to the reactor,
• Exhaust gas streams from the various process steps can be returned to a formaldehyde plant,
• • the greenfield process can be built and operated outside a conventional site, but is preferably operated in direct association with a formaldehyde plant. It is not necessary for the formaldehyde plant to provide the total amount of formaldehyde needed for OME synthesis, but it should be able to absorb the diluted recycle streams from the OME plant for recycling;
• The process can be set up and operated in conjunction with other processes at a Verbund site, preferably in combination with a methanol and formaldehyde plant and / or a refinery, preferably in combination with a formaldehyde plant, most preferably in combination with a Formaldehyde plant operating on the silver contact method. Alternatively, the reactants may be provided in whole or in part via a pipeline, ships or other logistics routes and the products shipped accordingly;
• The product produced can be used in, for example, the abovementioned applications, where it can be used, in particular, as sole or as a diesel fuel and the proportionate incorporation into other diesel fuels or their mixtures is effected by static or dynamic mixing in devices known to the person skilled in the art.

• • der Druck in der Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 beträgt von 0,2 bar bis 5 bar;
• • die Kopftemperatur in der Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 beträgt von 25°C bis 125°C;
• • die Sumpftemperatur in der Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 beträgt von 110°C bis 255 C;
• • die Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 weist 10 bis 40 theoretische Trennstufen, bevorzugt 15 bis 30 theoretische Trennstufen, besonders bevorzugt 20 bis 25 theoretische Trennstufen auf;
• • unterhalb des Zulaufs weist die Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 3 bis 20 theoretische Trennstufen auf;
• • das Rücklaufverhältnis in der Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 beträgt mindestens 0,20 g/g;
• • das Verhältnis aus Volumen der Flüssigkeit im Bereich zwischen Zulauf und Sumpfabzug einschließlich der gegebenenfalls vorhandenen Seitenreaktoren und des Sumpfes zum Volumenstrom des Sumpfabzugs in der Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 beträgt mindestens 10 min;
• • der pH-Wert in der Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 im Bereich zwischen Zulauf und Sumpfabzug einschließlich der gegebenenfalls vorhandenen Seitenreaktoren und des Sumpfes ist zwischen 4 und 14.

In a preferred embodiment, the column K1 has the following features during operation

• • the pressure in the reactive distillation column K1 is from 0.2 bar to 5 bar;
• • the top temperature in the reactive distillation column K1 is from 25 ° C to 125 ° C;
• • the bottom temperature in the reactive distillation column K1 is from 110 ° C to 255 C;
• The reactive distillation column K1 has from 10 to 40 theoretical plates, preferably from 15 to 30 theoretical plates, more preferably from 20 to 25 theoretical plates;
• • below the feed, the reactive distillation column K1 has 3 to 20 theoretical plates;
• The reflux ratio in the reactive distillation column K1 is at least 0.20 g / g;
• The ratio of the volume of the liquid in the region between inlet and bottom draw, including the optional side reactors and the sump to the volume flow of the bottom draw in the reactive distillation column K1 is at least 10 minutes;
• • The pH in the reactive distillation column K1 in the range between inlet and bottom draw, including the optional side reactors and the sump is between 4 and 14.

• • der Druck in der Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 beträgt von 0,5 bis 4 bar;
• • die Kopftemperatur in der Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 beträgt von 45 bis 115°C;
• • die Sumpftemperatur in der Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 beträgt von 140 bis 240°C;
• • die Reaktionsdestillationskolonne K1 weist 5 bis 30 theoretische Trennstufen auf;
• • unterhalb des Zulaufs weist die Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 4 bis 15 theoretische Trennstufen auf;
• • der pH-Wert in der Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 im Bereich zwischen Zulauf und Sumpfabzug ist zwischen 5 und 14.

In a particularly preferred embodiment, the column K1 has the following features during operation:

• • the pressure in the reactive distillation column K1 is from 0.5 to 4 bar;
• • the head temperature in the reactive distillation column K1 is from 45 to 115 ° C;
• • the bottom temperature in the reactive distillation column K1 is from 140 to 240 ° C;
• The reaction distillation column K1 has from 5 to 30 theoretical plates;
• • below the feed, the reactive distillation column K1 has 4 to 15 theoretical plates;
• • The pH in the reactive distillation column K1 in the range between inlet and bottom draw is between 5 and 14.

• • der Druck in der Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 beträgt von 1 bis 3 bar;
• • die Kopftemperatur in der Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 beträgt von 65 bis 105°C;
• • die Sumpftemperatur in der Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 beträgt von 170 bis 225°C;
• • die Reaktionsdestillationskolonne K1 weist 20 bis 25 theoretische Trennstufen auf;
• • unterhalb des Zulaufs weist die Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 5 bis 10 theoretische Trennstufen auf;
• • der pH-Wert in der Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 im Bereich zwischen Zulauf und Sumpfabzug ist zwischen 7 und 14.

In a particularly preferred embodiment, the column K1 has the following features during operation:

• • the pressure in the reactive distillation column K1 is from 1 to 3 bar;
• • the head temperature in the reactive distillation column K1 is from 65 to 105 ° C;
• • the bottom temperature in the reactive distillation column K1 is from 170 to 225 ° C;
• The reaction distillation column K1 has from 20 to 25 theoretical plates;
• • below the feed, the reactive distillation column K1 has 5 to 10 theoretical plates;
• • The pH in the reactive distillation column K1 in the range between inlet and bottom draw is between 7 and 14.

Catalysts in solid phase in combination with liquid or gaseous starting materials have the advantage of easy separability of the catalyst from the liquid or gaseous phase. Often, fluid phase catalysts can not be completely separated from the fluid phase of the reaction mixture. Thus, they remain partly in the reaction products and can lead to a reduction in product quality. Furthermore, they can lead to precipitation, deposits and fouling in apparatuses. Fouling reduces the availability and thus the capacity of the system. Due to the principle incomplete separation of the catalyst from the reaction mixture, this must always be supplemented. The rate of recycling of a fluid phase catalyst is always <100% within one process. Due to the losses of the expensive catalytic converter, this effectively reduces the economic efficiency of the overall process. This applies to processes which, for example, use liquid ionic liquids as catalyst or introduce a separate solvent in which a specific homogeneous catalyst is dissolved.

In general, in order to optimize the economic efficiency and to optimize and ensure the high product quality, auxiliary substances of every shape should be avoided as far as possible.

The person skilled in the art is aware that the handling of liquid and gaseous substances in process engineering apparatus is preferred. They are easy to promote. The corresponding apparatus are available in a variety of designs in large numbers. The apparatuses are not special constructions and are largely scalable without risk. Accordingly, planning and construction of a large-scale plant can be carried out economically. The scaling of the overall procedure is thus possible throughout. This raises economic benefits in accordance with the rules of the "economy of scale" familiar to the person skilled in the art. Distillation columns are generally preferred in the design of technical processes as apparatus since distillation columns are the most common type of material separation in chemical engineering. The methods of interpretation are generally. largely mature.

The skilled worker is aware that in the distillation of formaldehyde-containing multicomponent mixtures containing water and methanol reactions between water, methanol and formaldehyde lead to Polyoxymethylenglykolen and Polyoxymethylenhemiformalen (see reactions 2-5). The corresponding reactions are described in the literature ( Hahnenstein I., Albert M., Hasse H., Kreiter CG, Maurer G., NMR Spectroscopic and Densimetric Study of Reaction Kinetics of Formaldehyde Polymer Formation in Water, Deuterium Oxide, and Methanol, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 1995, 34 (2 ), 440-450 ). These mixtures have a complex phase behavior. Numerous (reactive) azeotropes form, which make the separation of the reaction mixture more difficult.

It has now surprisingly been found that OME with 3 or more oxymethylene units (OME _n≥3 ) can be quantitatively separated from the other components of the reactor _effluent in a single distillative separation step. Quantitative here means that at least 80%, preferably at least 85%, more preferably at least 90% of the OME _n≥3 are separated from the reactor effluent. This is initially not to be expected due to the similar boiling points of the OMN _n≥3 and the polyoxymethylene glycols (n ≥ 3) and Polyoxymethylenhemiformale (n≥ 3) inevitably contained in the reactor discharge. Due to the complex interaction of reactions and distillation, polyoxymethylene glycols (n ≥ 3) and polyoxymethylene hemiformals (n≥ 3) in the column obviously react to the analogous species of shorter chain length, which can now be separated from the OMN _{n≥3 by} distillation.

The column K2 is generally a conventional distillation column for the physical separation of mixtures, since the feed stream to the column K2 substantially contains no formaldehyde, methanol and water.

The subsequent steps for the separation of water by, in particular, pervaporation, vapor permeation and / or adsorption are procedurally established basic operations and are used, for example, for dewatering the fuel component bioethanol, as described in Frolkova AK, Raeva VM Bioethanol dehydration: state of the art, Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering, 2010 44 (4), 545-556 ,

In particular, describes US 2015/0053616 the possibility of dewatering aqueous solutions containing formaldehyde and OME by means of pervaporation. The possibility of dehydration of solutions containing formaldehyde, methanol and water by means of adsorption is also known, as described in Hasse H., vapor-liquid equilibria, enthalpies and reaction kinetics in formaldehyde-containing mixtures, Ph. D Thesis, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern 1990.

The scalability of adsorption and membrane processes on a large scale is given. Thus, adsorption plants with about 200 t adsorbent are technically realized, as described in Baerns M., Behr, A., Brehm A., Gmehling J., Hoffmann H., Onken U., Renken A., Technical Chemistry, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim 2006 ,

The scaling of membrane processes is generally carried out by increasing the installed membrane area, as described in Melin T., Rautenbach R., membrane processes, fundamentals of module and system design, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg 2007.

The peculiarity of the claimed method lies in the combination of the above-described reactive distillation K1 with a reactor and the other clever combination of reactor and reactive distillation with conventional steps for distillation and water separation, where all steps are scalable, and in the skillful recovery of recycle streams in the OME Process itself or in external processes such as formaldehyde production.

• 1: Skizze des beanspruchten Verfahrens. Die Abbildung zeigt eine bevorzugte Variante des erfindungsgemäßen Verfahrens.

A detailed sketch of a preferred embodiment of the claimed method is shown in FIG 1 shown.

• 1 : Sketch of the claimed method. The figure shows a preferred variant of the method according to the invention.

1. (i) Einspeisung von Formaldehyd und von Methanol im Allgemeinen in Form einer oder mehrerer wässriger Lösungen (Strom 1) sowie der Rückführströme 7 und 9 in einen Reaktor und Umsetzung zu einem Gemisch (Strom 3) enthaltend Formaldehyd, Wasser, Methylenglykol (MG), Polyoxymethylenglykole (MG_n), Methanol, Hemiformale (HF), Methylal (OME_n=1) und Polyoxymethylendimethylether (OME_n>1); dabei ist Strom 2 eine Mischung der Ströme 1, 7 und 9. Der Zulaufstrom 1 kann geringe Mengen weiterer Komponenten (z.B. Ameisensäure, Methylformiat und weitere dem Fachmann bekannte Verunreinigungen) enthalten; Im Allgemeinen wird Formaldehyd als wässrige Formaldehyd-Lösung mit einem Formaldehyd-Gehalt von 20 bis 95 Gew.-% in den Reaktor R eingespeist. Formaldehyd kann auch hochkonzentriert, flüssig oder gasförmig oder als Paraformaldehyd in Form einer Schmelze oder als wässrige Suspension in den OME-Synthesereaktor eingespeist werden;
2. (ii) Einspeisung des Reaktionsgemisches (Strom 3) in die spezielle Reaktivdestillationskolonne K1 und Auftrennung in eine Leichtsiederfraktion enthaltend im Wesentlichen Formaldehyd, Wasser, Methylenglykol (MG), Polyoxymethylenglykole (MG_n), Methanol, Hemiformale (HF), Methylal (OME_n=1) und Polyoxymethylendimethylether (OME_n=2) (Strom 4) und eine Schwersiederfraktion, enthaltend im Wesentlichen Polyoxymethylendimethylether (OME_n≥3) (Strom 5);
3. (iii) Einspeisung der Schwersiederfraktion (Strom 5) in die Destillationskolonne K2 und Auftrennung in eine Leichtsiederfraktion (Produktfraktion), enthaltend die gewünschten Produkt-Polyoxymethylendimethylether OME_n=3-6 (Strom 6) und eine Schwersiederfraktion, enthaltend Polyoxymethylendimethylether (OME_n>6) (Strom 7);
4. (iv) Rückführung der Schwersiederfraktion (Strom 7) in den Reaktor;
5. (v) Einspeisung der Leichtsiederfraktion (Strom 5) in einen Apparat zur Wasserabtrennung (bevorzugt Pervaporation, Dampfpermeation und Adsorption) und Auftrennung in einen wasserarmen Strom 9 und einen wasserreichen Strom 8;
6. (vi) Rückführung des wasserarmen Stroms 9 in den Reaktor.

The method comprises in detail the steps:

1. (i) feeding formaldehyde and methanol generally in the form of one or more aqueous solutions (stream 1 ) as well as the return streams 7 and 9 in a reactor and converted to a mixture (stream 3 containing formaldehyde, water, methylene glycol (MW), polyoxymethylene glycols (MW _n ), methanol, hemiformal (HF), methylal (OME _{n = 1} ) and polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether (OME _{n> 1} ); this is electricity 2 a mixture of the streams 1 . 7 and 9 , The feed stream 1 may contain minor amounts of other components (eg, formic acid, methyl formate, and other impurities known to those skilled in the art); In general, formaldehyde is fed as an aqueous formaldehyde solution having a formaldehyde content of 20 to 95 wt .-% in the reactor R. Formaldehyde can also be highly concentrated, liquid or gaseous or fed as paraformaldehyde in the form of a melt or as an aqueous suspension in the OME synthesis reactor;
2. (ii) feeding the reaction mixture (stream 3 ) into the special reactive distillation column K1 and separating into a low-boiling fraction containing essentially formaldehyde, water, methylene glycol (MG), polyoxymethylene glycols (MW _n ), methanol, hemiformal (HF), methylal (OME _{n = 1} ) and polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether (OME _{n = 2} ) (Electricity 4 ) and a high boiler fraction containing essentially polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether (OME _n≥3 ) (stream 5 );
3. (iii) feeding the high boiler fraction (stream 5 ) into the distillation column K2 and separation into a low boiler fraction (product fraction) containing the desired product polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether OME _{n = 3-6} (stream 6 ) and a high boiler fraction containing polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether (OME _{n> 6} ) (stream 7 );
4. (iv) recycling the high boiler fraction (stream 7 ) in the reactor;
5. (v) feeding the low boiler fraction (stream 5 ) in an apparatus for water separation (preferably pervaporation, vapor permeation and adsorption) and separation into a low-water stream 9 and a stream rich in water 8th ;
6. (vi) recycling the low-water stream 9 in the reactor.

The water-rich stream 8th can be discharged from the process and optionally returned to a formaldehyde plant.

The term "low boiler fraction" is used for that in the upper part, the term "high boiler fraction" for the mixture taken in the lower part of the column. In general, the low boiler fraction at the top of the column, the high boiler fraction at the bottom of the column. However, this is not mandatory. Also possible is the removal via side vents in the stripping or enrichment section of the column.

"Substantially consisting of" here and below means that the relevant fraction consists of at least 90 wt .-%, preferably at least 95% by weight of the said components.

The reaction of formaldehyde with methanol to give OME is done by the crude reaction equation (11). nCH ₂ O + 2CH ₃ OH ↔ CH ₃ -O- (CH ₂ -O) n -CH ₃ + H ₂ O (Reaction 11)

As solid catalysts are used, for example ion exchange resins, zeolites, aluminosilicates, alumina, titania. Are preferred ion exchange resins are particularly preferred ion exchange resins whose basic structure consists of sulfonated polystyrene (such as Amberlyst ^® 15, Amberlyst ^® 46). In general, however, all solid catalysts are in question, which have an acidic center. The pseudo-residence time of the reaction mixture over the catalyst is between 1 s and 7200 s, preferably between 5 s and 3600 s, more preferably between 8 s and 1800 s. The pseudo-residence time is defined here as the mass of the catalyst divided by the mass flow of the fluid flowing through the reactor. The reaction can be carried out in any apparatus which is suitable for carrying out reactions of fluid media on a fixed-bed contact: it can be carried out, for example, in suspension operation in a stirred tank reactor (CSTR), a tubular reactor or a loop reactor. In the less advantageous case, a reactive distillation can also be used. Preference is given to a fixed bed reactor, for example a simple catalyst bed flowed through as for the OME synthesis from trioxane and methylal, described in Burger J., Ströfer E., Hasse H .: Production process for diesel fuel components poly (oxymethylene) dimethyl ethers from methane-based products by hierarchical optimization with varying model depth. Chemical Engineering Research and Design. 2013, 91 (12), 2648-2662 , a tray reactor or a tube-bundle reactor or other devices known to those skilled in the art. The Temperature control in the reactor follows the rules known to those skilled in the art. It is to be performed by default due to the relatively low heat of reaction. The term "reactor" may include one or more apparatuses in parallel or serial construction.

The product mixture may then be contacted with an anion exchange resin to obtain a substantially acid-free product mixture.

The reaction is generally carried out at a temperature of 0 to 200 ° C, preferably 30 to 150 ° C, more preferably 40 to 120 ° C and a pressure of 0.3 to 30 bar, preferably 1 to 20 bar, most preferably 1 , 2 to 10 bar. It is also possible to supply the educts to a fixed bed reactor in gaseous form. In this case, liquid reactants must be evaporated before entering the reactor. Alternatively, gaseous educt streams from an upstream production unit without intermediate condensation and after a possible intermediate temperature can be fed directly to the reactor. Such gaseous streams may e.g. a gaseous formaldehyde-containing reactor effluent stream from a formaldehyde plant. If the educts are fed to the fixed bed reactor in gaseous form, condensation or partial condensation of the reactor discharge takes place before or in the workup by distillation. This condensation or partial condensation can also take place in the reactor itself if the temperature control in the reactor drops below the dew point of oligomers formed.

Even without the addition of a catalyst, the liquid reaction mixture forms polyoxymethylene glycols and polyoxymethylene hemiformals as coupling products. The condensation or chain formation reactions involved in the formation of the polyoxymethylene glycols, polyoxymethylene hemiformals and OME are equilibrium reactions and therefore (depending on the position of the chemical equilibrium) also proceed in the reverse direction as cleavage or chain degradation reactions. This results in the special requirements for the reactive distillation column K1.

Since the chemical reactions take place in the column K1 with finite reaction rate, the choice of suitable column internals is of importance. Due to the finite reaction rate of the chemical reactions, such internals are preferably used, which allow a high residence time and a high liquid content of the mixture in the column. If structured packings are used, in particular special rinse packs, as used in EP 1 074 296 are described. If floors are used, come in particular. special residence time floors into consideration (eg Thormann ^® floors). To increase the residence time, it is also conceivable to equip the column K1 with one side reactor or several side reactors. In this case, the column for each side reactor is taken from a side take, which is passed into a side tank in which the chemical reactions can also run. The effluent from the side tank is returned to the column.

The higher the concentration of formaldehyde in the feed of the column, the higher the pressure of the column is preferably chosen, in order to avoid a solid precipitation. Up to about 5% by weight of formaldehyde, the column is preferably operated at 1 bar. From about 5 wt .-% formaldehyde, the column is preferably operated as a pressure column.

Apart from the column K1, the further distillation columns are generally columns of conventional design. In question are packed columns, tray columns and packed columns and combinations, preferably tray columns and packed columns are.

The distillation column K2 is operated at a pressure of 0.01 to 1 bar, preferably at a pressure of 0.05 to 0.9 bar and particularly preferably at a pressure of 0.1 to 0.5 bar. The operating temperatures are generally 60 to 300 ° C. The column has a theoretical number of stages of from 5 to 40, preferably from 8 to 20, particularly preferably from 10 to 18. The design of the column K2 is carried out by default according to the rules known to those skilled in the art. The separation in the column K2 is described in the literature ( Burger J., Ströfer E., Hasse H. Production process for diesel fuel components poly (oxymethylene) dimethyl ethers from methane-based products by hierarchical optimization with varying model depth. Chemical Engineering Research and Design. 2013, 91 (12), 2648-2662 )

Since the desired OME chain length n = 3-6 represent a middle-boiling fraction of the reactor, it is also conceivable to increase the efficiency of the overall process to integrate the two columns K1 and K2 in a single reactive dividing wall column. This reduces both the investment and the operating costs of the plant. Such dividing wall columns are for example in US 5,914,012 described.

In this case, a dividing wall is installed in the column, which extends continuously through the stripping section, the inlet flow section and at least part of the column reinforcement section. However, it can also extend over the entire amplifier part. In this reactive dividing wall column, the top product is a mixture of formaldehyde, methanol, water, methylal and OME _{n = 2} . The side product which is withdrawn at the level of the feed or between feed and bottom on the side of the dividing wall of the column opposite the feed is the desired product stream containing OME of chain length n = 3-6. In the bottom of the column, the OMEs of chain lengths n ≥ 6 occur. This reactive dividing wall column is operated at a pressure of 0.01 to 5 bar, preferably at a pressure of 0.05 to 4 bar and particularly preferably at a pressure of 0.01 to 3 bar. The operating temperatures are essentially analogous to the temperatures when the columns K1 and K2 are operated individually. The column has a theoretical number of stages of 15 to 80, preferably 30 to 50, particularly preferably 35 to 40. This accounts for 10 to 30, preferably 15 to 25 stages on the area with built-in partition.

To increase the energy efficiency of the process, it is possible to thermally couple the distillation columns. In this case, by suitable temperature and pressure control of the columns, e.g. the vapors used a column for heating another column. It is also conceivable to compress the vapors of the columns and to use as a heating medium for various evaporators of the process. It is also conceivable to couple the plant energetically with other systems in the composite, preferably with a formaldehyde plant. The dissipated heat of reaction from the formaldehyde reactor can be used, for example, to generate heating steam for the OME plant.

electricity 6 It contains more than 95 wt .-% OME _{n = 3-6} , preferably more than 98 wt .-% OME _{n = 3-6} , most preferably more than 99% OME _{n = 3 -6} .

In the case of the design of the water separation as pervaporation or Dampfpermeationsanlage inorganic and polymeric membranes can be used. As polymeric membranes, e.g. Considered: polyamide, polyamideimide, polyacrylonitrile, polybenzimidazole, polyester, polycarbonate, polyetherimide, polyethylenimine, polyimide, polymethylmethacrylate, polypropylene, polysulfone, polyethersulfone, polyphenylsulfone, polytetrafluoroethylene, polyvinylidene fluoride, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyvinylalcohol, polydimethylsiloxane. The degree of cross-linking of the polymeric membrane is freely adjustable. The mechanical stability of the membranes can be increased by a supporting layer. As the inorganic membrane, e.g. Consider: zeolites, metal oxides such as e.g. Alumina, zirconia, silica, titania and glass. The pore structure of the membranes can be both symmetric and asymmetric. Preference is given to using inorganic membranes, particular preference being given to using inorganic zeolites as membrane. The arrangement of the membrane modules is preferably as, but not limited to, a "fir-tree" structure. As a result, all the membrane modules used are loaded equally fluid dynamically. As membrane modules are all known in the art module forms such. Tube modules, plate modules, capillary modules and hollow fiber modules into consideration. If polymeric membranes are used, plate modules are preferred. If inorganic membranes are used, tube modules are preferred.

The operating pressure on the inlet side of the membrane is between 0.1 and 200 bar, preferably between 1 and 150 bar. The pressure on the permeate side is between 0.001 and 10 bar, preferably between 0.01 and 5 bar. The temperature is between 30 and 200 ° C. It is known to the person skilled in the art that, in particular in the case of pervaporation between the membrane modules, the retentate streams are generally heated by interposed heat exchangers. In particular, it is possible to use the retentate stream from the last membrane module for preheating the inlet of the first membrane module.

Depending on the selected pressure level on the permeate side of the membrane, a condensation of the permeate stream is carried out by cooling water or cooling brine. Other process streams from the OME plant or a formaldehyde plant can also be used. Cooling brine is preferably used at very low pressures on the permeate side. If a vacuum is applied to the permeate side, both a mechanical and a thermally operating vacuum pump can be used. In the latter case, a jet compressor is preferably used.

If a vapor permeation unit is used, it is possible to operate the column K1 only with a partial condenser, so that the uncondensed vapor of the column K1 is passed directly into the vapor permeation unit. However, it is also also possible to operate the column K1 with a total condenser and to evaporate the feed stream of the vapor permeation system beforehand with the aid of an additional heat exchanger.

In the case of the embodiment of the water separation as adsorption all common adsorbent materials can be used. Examples are zeolites, activated carbon, adsorbent resins, metal oxides such as alumina, zirconia, silica (silica gels, silica gels) and titania, salts such as magnesium sulfate, sodium sulfate, calcium hydride, calcium oxide, calcium sulfate, potassium carbonate, potassium hydroxide, copper sulfate, lithium aluminum hydride, sodium hydroxide, and elemental alkalis and alkaline earth metals. Preference is given to using zeolites and metal oxides, very particular preference to using zeolites. The preferred adsorbent materials can be regenerated particularly easily by suitable temperature and pressure control. If zeolites are used as adsorbents, it is preferred to use zeolites of the NaA type, more preferably zeolites of the NaA type, whose pore size is between 2 and 10 angstroms. The water-rich stream F6 accumulates in the discontinuous operation in the regeneration of the adsorber. Desorb water and the additionally adsorbed components.

The adsorption system is preferably designed as a simple fixed bed system. However, all other types of adsorbers known to the person skilled in the art are also possible. The regeneration of the adsorber material is in this case preferably by pressure and / or temperature changes in discontinuous operation. Therefore, as a rule, at least two adsorber fixed beds are required, so that the other fixed bed can be regenerated during the operation of a fixed bed. An arrangement with more than 3 adsorber beds in parallel operation is usual. The feed stream to the adsorber can be both gaseous and liquid.

It is also conceivable the electricity 4 attributed without separation of water directly in a formaldehyde plant and perform the removal of water in the formaldehyde plant. Besides methanol, full acetals also react with electricity 4 in the reactor of formaldehyde synthesis to formaldehyde and water ( Masamoto J., Matsuzaki K., Development of methylal synthesis by reactive distillation; Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 1994, 27 (1), 1-5 ). The removal of water is possible by a subsequent concentration of the resulting formaldehyde solution, such as in US 7,342,139 ; US 7,345,207 ; US 7,273,955 ; US 7,193,115 ; US 6,610,888 ; US 6,610,888 ; US 7,414,159 are described. The concentrated solution is again made available for OME synthesis in the reactor of OME synthesis. Also, as in US 7,390,932 described, highly concentrated formaldehyde are prepared in the gas phase and fed to the reactor. Furthermore, the aqueous formaldehyde solution can be converted by known methods into paraformaldehyde, which is fed to the reactor as a melt or solid suspension. Also independent of the return of the stream 4 For example, highly concentrated liquid or gaseous formaldehyde or paraformaldehyde can be used as a melt or suspension in the OME synthesis reactor.

In addition to the preferred starting material methanol can be used in the OME synthesis as a reactant of formaldehyde derivatives of methanol such as methylal, dimethyl ether, OME ₂ and / or mixtures thereof with each other and / or with methanol.

In addition to the methanol as the simplest alcohol and its derivatives can be used as reactants of formaldehyde in principle, other alcohols, such as ethanol, propanol and butanol and / or mixtures thereof and / or with methanol. What has been said above about the derivatives of methanol applies analogously to the derivatives of other alcohols, and also mixed derivatives such as C ₂ H ₅ O - CH ₂ - OCH ₃ or C ₂ H ₅ -O-CH _{3 are} possible. In the case of miscibility gaps, emulsions are used.

The process according to the invention can be operated wholly or partly continuously or batchwise. This also applies to the reactor and the columns. Preferred is the continuous operation of the process. Units, e.g. The water removal by adsorption, which are generally operated technically preferably batchwise, are designed in several apparatuses in parallel design so that practically a continuous flow of all streams through this unit is possible.

The invention furthermore relates to the products obtainable by the process according to the invention and the mixtures of these products with fuel and oil fractions from a refinery or a refinery complex. These blends may also include fuel adjuncts and additives known to those skilled in the art.

The composition of a mixture of OME oligomers, when the reactor of the process is operated close to the point of equilibrium _conversion , is 0.35 g / g ≤ x _OME3 ≤ 0.79 g / g, 0.17 g / g ≤ x _OME4 ≤ 0.36 g / g, 0.04 g / g ≤ x _OME5 ≤ 0.31 g / g, x _OME6 ≤ 0.06 g / g, preferably 0.37 g / g ≤ x _OME3 ≤ 0.70 g / G; 0.23 g / g ≤ x _OME4 ≤ 0.35 g / g, 0.07 g / g ≤ x _OME5 ≤ 0.26 g / g, x _OME6 ≤ 0.08 g / g, most preferably 0.40 g / g _≦ x _{OME3 ≦} 0.62 g / g; 0.26 g / g ≤ x _OME4 ≤ 0.35 g / g, 0.11 g / g ≤ x _OME5 ≤ 0.26 g / g, x _OME6 ≤ 0.12 g / g. Here, x _OMEn is the mass fraction of the OME oligomer with n oxymethylene units, based on the mass of the mixture.

As used herein, "near equilibrium" means that no concentration of the above individual OME species is more than 40% away from the value corresponding to the composition of a reaction mixture that is in thermodynamic equilibrium.

The composition of this mixture of OME oligomers is a consequence of the procedure described above.

However, depending on customer demand, other mixtures of OME oligomers may be made. This preparation is carried out by varying the process control in the reactor and especially the position of the separating cuts in the columns. The recycle streams must then be adjusted accordingly and the process no longer works at the economic and ecological optimum.

Further separation of the product OME _{n = 3-6} according to the chain length is possible by means of process engineering operations such as, for example, distillation. The design of a distillation sequence for the separation of OME _{n = 3-6} according to the chain length is to be carried out by default in this case. Preferably (but not exclusively) first OME _{3 is obtained} as the top product of a first distillation column, OME ₄ as the top product of a second distillation column, OME ₅ as the top product of a third distillation column and OME ₆ as the bottom product of the third distillation column. However, the optional separation of the product OME _{n = 3-6} does not change the above-described distribution of the OME oligomers among one another, since the ratios of the OME chain lengths are only insignificantly influenced by the separation which is not perfectly sharp in reality.

The invention is explained in more detail by the following examples.

Examples

Example 1: Overall method

Table 1 to Table 4 show four typical current strips of a preferred variant of the claimed method within the measurement accuracies. The numbers are rounded accordingly. The mass fraction means 0.00 g / g a mass fraction <0.005 g / g. In Table 1 to Table 3, the mass ratio of formaldehyde to methanol in stream 1 , 1.65. The water content in electricity 1 was varied between 0.05 g / g (Table 1), 0.10 g / g (Table 2) and 0.20 g / g (Table 3). In Table 4, the mass ratio of formaldehyde to methanol in electricity 1 , 1.60. The water content in electricity 1 is 0.10 g / g.

The water separation was dimensioned in all cases so that the water content in electricity 9 about 0.02 g / g. As the water content in electricity 1 from Table 1 to Table 3 is increased, so that the proportion of water mass in electricity 9 is constant, in general in the case of the design of the water separation as Dampfpermeations- or pervaporation plant, the installed membrane area has been increased and for the case of the design of the water separation as adsorption the adsorber mass has been increased.

Due to the performance of the experiments on a microscale, however, the increase in the membrane area is negligibly small in this example.

The mass flow and the composition of electricity 8th (discharged water flow) may vary depending on the nature of the design of the water separation. The tables show electricity 8th (not specified) from the difference of the currents 4 and 9 , Table 1: Example (case 1) for a current bar of the method according to the invention; Feed composition (stream 1): water content = 0.05 g / g, mass ratio of formaldehyde to methanol = 1.65 electricity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 Mass flow / (kg / h) 1.2 6.1 6.1 5.0 1.1 1.0 0.1 4.8 Mass fractions / (g / g) formaldehyde 0.59 0.36 0.25 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 methanol 0.36 0.20 0.13 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 water 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 methylal 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 OME ₂ 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.19 0.00 <0.02 0.00 0.19 OME ₃ 0.00 0.00 0.09 <0.01 0.47 0.54 0.00 0.00 OME ₄ 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.26 0.30 0.00 0.00 OME ₅ 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.14 0.16 0.00 0.00 OME ₆ 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.07 <0.02 0.56 0.00 OME ₇ 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.29 0.00 OME ₈ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.15 0.00

For the power strip from Table 1 (case 1 ) a pilot plant was operated on a microscale. As a reactor, a fixed bed reactor with 200 g of the heterogeneous catalyst Amberlyst ^® was used 46, previously rinsed with methanol. The reactor was operated at 60 ° C. The reactive distillation column K1 was equipped with the structured packing Sulzer CY with 20 theoretical plates. The feed took place at the level of level 10 , The pressure in the column K1 was 2 bar. The head temperature in the column K1 was 85 ° C, the bottom temperature was 200 ° C. Column K1 was operated at a reflux ratio of 1.0 kg / kg. The inlet temperature of the column K1 corresponded to the reactor temperature of 60 ° C. Column K2 was equipped with the structured laboratory kit Sulzer DX with 15 theoretical plates. The feed was on stage 8th with a temperature of also 60 ° C. The pressure in the column K2 was 0.1 bar. The head temperature in the column K2 was 97 ° C, the bottom temperature was 203 ° C. Column K2 was operated at a reflux ratio of 0.8 kg / kg. The water was separated by pervaporation. The membrane used was a membrane of NaA zeolite with a pore size of 4.2 Å. The effective membrane area was about 2 m ² . Pervaporation was carried out at 70 ° C and an inlet pressure of 2 bar. On the permeate side, a vacuum of 50 mbar was set. The operation of the pilot plant was carried out for 8 h in continuous operation. Table 2: Example (Case 2) for a current bar of the claimed method; Feed composition (stream 1): water content = 0.10 g / g; Mass ratio of formaldehyde to methanol = 1.65 electricity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 Mass flow / (kg / h) 1.2 6.5 6.5 5.4 1.1 1.0 0.1 5.1 Mass fractions / (g / g) formaldehyde 0.56 0.37 0.27 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 methanol 0.34 0.20 0.14 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 water 0.10 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 methylal 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 OME ₂ 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.17 0.00 <0.02 0.00 0.18 OME ₃ 0.00 0.00 0.08 <0.01 0.47 0.54 0.00 0.00 OME ₄ 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.26 0.30 0.00 0.00 OME ₅ 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.14 0.16 0.00 0.00 OME ₆ 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.07 <0.02 0.56 0.00 OME ₇ 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.29 0.00 OME ₈ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.15 0.00

For the power strip from Table 2 (case 2 ) a pilot plant was operated on a microscale. The head temperature of the reactive distillation column K1 here was 89 ° C, the bottom temperature was 202 ° C. The operating parameters of all other apparatuses correspond to those in case of measurement inaccuracies 1 , In particular, the head and bottom temperatures for the column K2 are due to the similar composition of the feed stream 5 equal. Table 3: Example (Case 3) for a current bar of the claimed method; Feed composition (stream 1): water content = 0.20 g / g; Mass ratio of formaldehyde to methanol = 1.65 electricity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 Mass flow / (kg / h) 1.4 7.3 7.3 6.2 1.1 1.0 0.1 5.8 Mass fractions / (g / g) formaldehyde 0.50 0.39 0.30 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 methanol 0.30 0.21 0.15 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 water 0.20 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 methylal 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 OME ₂ 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.00 <0.02 0.00 0.16 OME ₃ 0.00 0.00 0.07 <0.01 0.47 0.54 0.00 0.00 OME ₄ 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.26 0.30 0.00 0.00 OME ₅ 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.14 0.16 0.00 0.00 OME ₆ 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.07 <0.02 0.56 0.00 OME ₇ 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.29 0.00 OME ₈ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.15 0.00

For the power strip from Table 3 (case 3 ) a pilot plant was operated on a microscale. The head temperature of the reactive distillation column K1 here was 91 ° C, the bottom temperature was 202 ° C. The operating parameters of all other apparatuses correspond to those in case of measurement inaccuracies 1 , In particular, the head and bottom temperatures for the column K2 are due to the similar composition of the feed stream 5 equal. Table 4: Example (Case 4) for a current bar of the claimed method; Feed composition (stream 1): water content = 0.1 g / g; Mass ratio of formaldehyde to methanol = 1.60 electricity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 Mass flow / (kg / h) 1.2 8.0 8.0 6.9 1.1 1.0 0.1 6.7 Mass fractions / (g / g) formaldehyde 0.55 0.27 0.19 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 methanol 0.35 0.18 0.13 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 water 0.10 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 methylal 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 OME ₂ 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.19 0.00 <0.02 0.00 0.20 OME ₃ 0.00 0.00 0.08 <0.01 0.57 0.62 0.00 0.00 OME ₄ 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.25 0.27 0.00 0.00 OME ₅ 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.00 OME ₆ 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.04 <0.02 0.64 0.00 OME ₇ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.26 0.00 OME ₈ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.10 0.00

For the power strip from Table 4 (case 4 ) a pilot plant was operated on a microscale. The head temperature in the column K1 here was 82 ° C, the bottom temperature was 195 ° C. The head temperature in the column K2 here was 94 ° C, the bottom temperature was 200 ° C. The operating parameters of all other apparatuses correspond to those in case of measurement inaccuracies 1 ,

Example 2: Operation of the Special Reactive Distillation Column K1

The operating parameters of an embodiment of the special reactive distillation column K1 are summarized in Table 5. The mass fraction 0.00 g / g means a mass fraction <0.005 g / g. The column was in this case with an inlet with the composition of the stream 3 from Table 2 at level 12 fed. For this feed, the number of minimum theoretical plates required is between 10 and 18, depending on the desired yield of OME _n≥3 in the bottom of the column. The column was operated at 2 bar and a reflux ratio of 1.0 kg / kg, the number of theoretical plates is 30 (including evaporator and condenser). The structured packing Sulzer CY with a specific surface area of 700 m ² / m ^{3 was} used as a separation-effective installation. The diameter of the column was 53 mm and the liquid content on each theoretical plate was between 10 and 80 ml of liquid. This corresponds to between 1% and 8% of the empty pipe volume. In addition, special trays and liquid distributors were installed between each shot to allow a high residence time of the mixture in the column. Table 5: Betriebssparamater an embodiment of the special reactive distillation column K1 at p = 2 bar. Intake bottoms overhead Temperature / (° C) 60 202 89 Mass flow / (kg / h) 1.10 0.19 0.91 Mass fractions / (g / g) formaldehyde 0.27 <0.01 0.33 methanol 0.14 <0.01 0.17 water 0.05 <0.01 0.06 methylal 0.22 <0.01 0.27 OME ₂ 0.14 0.00 0.17 OME ₃ 0.08 0.43 <0.01 OME ₄ 0.05 0.28 0 OME ₅ 0.02 0.11 0 OME ₆ 0.01 0.06 0 OME ₇ 0.01 0.06 0 OME ₈ 0.01 0.06 0

In addition, in the same column, a distillation experiment with a feed with the composition of the stream 3 from Table 4 at level 12 fed. This represents a further embodiment of the special reactive distillation column K1. For this feed, the number of theoretically necessary minimum separation stages is between 5 and 13, depending on the desired yield of OME _n≥3 in the bottom of the column. The column was operated at 1.6 bar and a reflux ratio of 0.9 kg / kg, the number of theoretical plates is again 30 (including evaporator and condenser). The liquid content on each theoretical plate was between 10 and 80 ml of liquid. This corresponds to between 1% and 8% of the empty pipe volume. The operating parameters of this column are summarized in Table 6.

In both versions of the special reactive distillation column OME _n≥3 can be obtained with very high yield in the bottom of the column. Table 6: Betriebsparamater a version of special reactive distillation column K1 at p = 1.6 bar Intake bottoms overhead Temperature / (° C) 60 185 75 Mass flow / (kg / h) 1.20 0.16 1.04 Mass fractions / (g / g) formaldehyde 0.19 <0.01 0.22 methanol 0.13 <0.01 0.15 water 0.05 <0.01 0.05 methylal 0.33 <0.01 0.38 OME ₂ 0.17 0.00 0.19 OME ₃ 0.08 0.56 <0.01 OME ₄ 0.03 0.26 0 OME ₅ 0.01 0.11 0 OME ₆ 0.01 0.05 0 OME ₇ 0.00 0.02 0 OME ₈ 0.00 0.01 0

Example 3: Water separation by means of adsorption

In a batch shake flask experiment four different liquid mixtures consisting of formaldehyde, water, methanol, methylal OME ₂ and OME ₃ with the adsorber zeolite were used 3A brought into contact at the temperature of 25 ° C. The proportion of water was systematically varied while the ratios of all other components remained constant. The mass ratio of liquid to adsorber is 2: 1. The composition was measured before and after the adsorption process. The results are shown in Table 7 (before adsorption) and Table 8 (after adsorption). It can be seen that the mass fraction of water was significantly reduced by adding the adsorber. The adsorber material was then regenerated at a temperature> 50 ° C and a pressure <500 mbar and could be reused. Table 7: Compositions of the liquid mixtures before adsorption. mixture 1 2 3 4 Mass fractions / (g / g) formaldehyde 12:21 12:19 12:18 12:17 methanol 12:29 12:27 12:25 12:24 water 12:01 12:07 12:12 12:16 methylal 12:30 12:28 12:26 12:25 OME ₂ 12:20 12:19 12:18 12:17 Table 8: Compositions of liquid mixtures after adsorption mixture 1 2 3 4 Mass fractions / (g / g) formaldehyde 12:21 12:20 12:19 12:19 methanol 12:27 12:28 12:27 12:26 water 00:00 12:02 12:05 12:09 methylal 12:30 12:28 12:29 12:27 OME ₂ 12:21 12:21 12:20 12:19

Example 4: Water separation by membrane process

In a laboratory pervaporation plant, a membrane of NaA zeolite with a pore size of 4.2 Å with a feed stream corresponding to the composition of the stream 4 from Table 4. The feed pressure was 2 bar, and on the permeate side, a vacuum of 50 mbar was set. The pervaporation was carried out at 80 ° C and the effective membrane area is 70 cm ² . The permeate stream was by means of a cold trap cooled with liquid nitrogen and then analyzed. The mass fraction of water in the permeate stream was> 0.95 g / g. In addition to water, methanol, formaldehyde and methylal were detected in the permeate stream.

QUOTES INCLUDE IN THE DESCRIPTION

This list of the documents listed by the applicant has been generated automatically and is included solely for the better information of the reader. The list is not part of the German patent or utility model application. The DPMA assumes no liability for any errors or omissions.

Cited patent literature

• US 2449469 [0006]
• US 5746785 [0007, 0029]
• US 6534685 [0008, 0032]
• US 6392102 [0009, 0014, 0017]
• US 7342139 [0016, 0082]
• US 7999140 [0018]
• WO 2006/045506 [0018]
• US 7671240 [0019]
• US 2011/0313202 [0028]
• EP 2987781 [0029]
• US 2014/0114093 [0030]
• US 2015/0094497 [0031]
• US 2015/0053616 [0054]
• EP 1074296 [0068]
• US 5914012 [0072]
• US 7345207 [0082]
• US 7273955 [0082]
• US 7193115 [0082]
• US 6610888 [0082]
• US 7414159 [0082]
• US 7390932 [0082]

Cited non-patent literature

• Reuss G., Disteldorf W., Grundler O., Hilt A., Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim 1988 [0003, 0027]
• Burger J., Ströfer E., Hasse H. Production process for diesel fuel components poly (oxymethylene) dimethyl ethers from methane-based products by hierarchical optimization with varying model depth. Chemical Engineering Research and Design. 2013, 91 (12), 2648-2662 [0004, 0071]
• N., Friebel A., by Harbou E., Burger J., Hasse H., Liquid-liquid equilibrium in binary and tertiary mixtures containing formaldehyde, water, methanol, methylal, and poly (oxymethylene) dimethyl ether, Fluid Phase Equilibria. 2016 (425). 127 to 135 [0020]
• Schmitz N., Homberg F., Berje J., Burger J., Hasse H. Chemical equilibrium of the synthesis of poly (oxymethylene) dimethyl ethers from formaldehyde and methanol in aqueous solutions. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2015, 54 (25). 6409-6417 [0033]
• Schmitz N., Burger J., Ströfer, E., Hasse, H. From methanol to the oxygenated diesel fuel poly (oxymethylene) dimethyl ether: An assessemnt of the production costs. Fuel. 2016 (185), 67 - 72 [0033]
• Schmitz et al. (Schmitz N., Homberg F., Berje J., Burger J., Hasse H. Chemical equilibrium of the synthesis of poly (oxymethylene) dimethyl ethers from formaldehyde and methanol in aqueous solutions. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2015, 54 ( 25) 6409-6417 [0033]
• Schmitz N., Burger J., Hasse H. Reaction kinetics of the formation of poly (oxymethylene) dimethyl ethers from formaldehyde and methanol in aqueous solutions. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2015, 54 (50). 12553-12560 [0034]
• Burger J., Ströfer E., Hasse H., Production process for diesel fuel components poly (oxymethylene) dimethyl ethers from methane-based products by hierarchical optimization with varying model depth. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2013, 91 (12), 2648-2662 [0036]
• Hahnenstein I., Albert M., Hasse H., Kreiter CG, Maurer G., NMR Spectroscopic and Densimetric Study of Reaction Kinetics of Formaldehyde Polymer Formation in Water, Deuterium Oxide, and Methanol, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 1995, 34 (2 ), 440-450 [0050]
• A.K., Raeva V.M. Bioethanol dehydration: state of the art, Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering, 2010 44 (4), 545-556 [0053]
• Baerns M., Behr, A., Brehm A., Gmehling J., Hoffmann H., Onken U., Renken A., Technical Chemistry, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim 2006 [0055]
• J., Ströfer E., Hasse H .: Production process for diesel fuel components poly (oxymethylene) dimethyl ethers from methane-based products by hierarchical optimization with varying model depth. Chemical Engineering Research and Design. 2013, 91 (12), 2648-2662 [0064]
• Masamoto J., Matsuzaki K., Development of methylal synthesis by reactive distillation; Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 1994, 27 (1), 1-5 [0082]

Claims (16)

Process for the preparation of polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers having ≥3 oxymethylene units (OME _n≥3 ) comprising the steps of: (i) feeding formaldehyde, methanol and water into a reactor R and converting to a reaction mixture containing formaldehyde, water, methylene glycol, polyoxymethylene glycols, methanol , Hemiformale, Methylal (OME _{n = 1} ) and Polyoxymethylendimethylether (OME _{n> 1} ); (ii) feeding the reaction mixture into a reactive distillation column K1 and separating it into a low boiler fraction F1 containing formaldehyde, water, methylene glycol, polyoxymethylene glycols, methanol, hemiformals, methylal (OME _{n = 1} ) and polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether having 2 to 3 oxymethylene units (OME _{n = 2 -3} ) and a high-boiling fraction F2 containing polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether with more than two oxymethylene units (OME _n≥3 ). Method according to Claim 1 for the preparation of Polyoxymethylendimethylethern having 3 to 6 oxymethylene units (OME _{n = 3-6} ) _comprising the steps: (i) feeding of formaldehyde, methanol and water into a reactor R and conversion to a reaction mixture containing formaldehyde, water, methylene glycol, polyoxymethylene glycols , Methanol, hemiformals, methylal (OME _{n = 1} ) and polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether (OME _{n> 1} ); (ii) feeding the reaction mixture into a reactive distillation column K1 and separating it into a low-boiling fraction F1 comprising formaldehyde, water, methylene glycol, polyoxymethylene glycols, methanol, hemiformals, methylal (OME _{n = 1} ) and polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether having 2 to 3 oxymethylene units (OME _{n = 2 -3} ) and a high boiler fraction F2 containing polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether with more than two oxymethylene units (OME _n≥3 ); (iii) feeding the high boiler fraction F2 into a distillation column K2 and separating it into a product fraction F3 comprising polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether having 3 to 6 oxymethylene units (OME _{n = 3-6} ) and a high boiler fraction F4 containing polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether with more than 6 oxymethylene units (OME _{n > 6} ); (iv) optionally recycling the high boiler fraction F4 to the reactor R. Method according to Claim 1 or 2 with the additional steps of: (v) feeding the low boiler fraction F1 into an apparatus for separating water and separating water or a stream rich in water F6, whereby a water-lean stream F5 is obtained; (vi) optionally, recycling the low-water stream F5 into the reactor R. Method according to Claim 3 with the additional step of: (vii) distilling the water-rich stream F6 to recover a stream F7 containing methanol and methylal and returning it to the reactor R, and a water, formaldehyde and polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether having from 2 to 3 oxymethylene units (OME _{n = 2 -3} ) containing stream F8 is obtained. Method according to Claim 2 , characterized in that the columns K1 and K2 are formed as a single reactive distillation dividing wall column, the low boiler fraction F1 being obtained as top draw stream, the product fraction F3 as side draw stream and the high boiler fraction F4 as bottom draw stream of the dividing wall column. Method according to one of Claims 1 to 5 , characterized in that formaldehyde is fed as an aqueous formaldehyde solution having a formaldehyde content of 20 to 95 wt .-% in the reactor R. Method according to one of Claims 1 to 5 , characterized in that formaldehyde is fed as paraformaldehyde in melt or suspension in the reactor R. Method according to one of Claims 1 to 7 characterized in that the reaction in step (i) is carried out in the presence of a solid catalyst selected from the group consisting of ion exchange resins, zeolites, aluminosilicates, alumina and titania. Method according to one of Claims 1 to 8th , characterized in that the pH in the reactive distillation column K1 is from 4 to 14. Method according to one of Claims 1 to 9 , characterized in that the water separation apparatus used in step (v) is a pervaporation, vapor permeation or adsorption unit. Method according to one of Claims 1 to 10 , characterized in that the reactive distillation column has the following features during operation: • the pressure in the reactive distillation column K1 is from 0.2 bar to 5 bar; • the top temperature in the reactive distillation column K1 is from 25 ° C to 125 ° C; • the bottom temperature in the reactive distillation column K1 is from 110 ° C to 255 C; The reactive distillation column K1 has from 10 to 40 theoretical plates, preferably from 15 to 30 theoretical plates, more preferably from 20 to 25 theoretical plates; • below the feed, the reactive distillation column K1 has 3 to 20 theoretical plates; The reflux ratio in the reactive distillation column K1 is at least 0.20 g / g; The ratio of the volume of the liquid in the region between inlet and bottom draw, including the optional side reactors and the sump to the volume flow of the bottom draw in the reactive distillation column K1 is at least 10 minutes; • The pH in the reactive distillation column K1 in the range between inlet and bottom draw, including the optional side reactors and the bottom is greater than 4. Method according to Claim 11 , characterized in that • the pressure in the reactive distillation column K1 is from 0.5 to 4 bar; • the head temperature in the reactive distillation column K1 is from 45 to 115 ° C; • the bottom temperature in the reactive distillation column K1 is from 140 to 240 ° C; The reaction distillation column K1 has from 5 to 30 theoretical plates; • below the feed, the reactive distillation column K1 has 4 to 15 theoretical plates; • the pH in the reactive distillation column K1 is greater than 5 in the range between inlet and bottom outlet. Method according to Claim 12 , characterized in that • the pressure in the reactive distillation column K1 is from 1 to 3 bar; • the head temperature in the reactive distillation column K1 is from 65 to 105 ° C; • the bottom temperature in the reactive distillation column K1 is from 170 to 225 ° C; The reaction distillation column K1 has from 20 to 25 theoretical plates; • below the feed, the reactive distillation column K1 has from 5 to 10 theoretical plates; • The pH in the reactive distillation column K1 in the range between inlet and sump deduction is between 7 and 14. Mixture of polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers having 3 to 6 oxymethylene units (OME _{n = 3-6} ) with the composition 0.35 g / g ≤ x _OME3 ≤ 0.79 g / g, 0.17 g / g ≤ x _OME4 ≤ 0, 36 g / g, 0.04 g / g ≤ x ≤ _OME5 0.31 g / g, and x _OME6 ≤ 0.06 g / g, obtainable by the process according to any of Claims 1 to 8th , Mixture after Claim 14 with the composition 0.37 g / g ≤ x _OME3 ≤ 0.70 g / g; 0.23 g / g ≤ x _OME4 ≤ 0.35 g / g, 0.07 g / g ≤ x _OME5 ≤ 0.26 g / g, x _OME6 ≤ 0.08 g / g. Mixture after Claim 15 with the composition 0.40 g / g ≤ x _OME3 ≤ 0.62 g / g; 0.26 g / g ≤ x _OME4 ≤ 0.35 g / g, 0.11 g / g ≤ x _OME5 ≤ 0.26 g / g, x _OME6 ≤ 0.12 g / g.

Images