CN210130820U - Pain scoring ruler - Google Patents

Pain scoring ruler Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN210130820U
CN210130820U CN201920370399.0U CN201920370399U CN210130820U CN 210130820 U CN210130820 U CN 210130820U CN 201920370399 U CN201920370399 U CN 201920370399U CN 210130820 U CN210130820 U CN 210130820U
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
pain
scoring
scale
ruler body
scoring table
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201920370399.0U
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
蔡昀方
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
Original Assignee
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Zhejiang Cancer Hospital filed Critical Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
Priority to CN201920370399.0U priority Critical patent/CN210130820U/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN210130820U publication Critical patent/CN210130820U/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Length-Measuring Instruments Using Mechanical Means (AREA)

Abstract

The pain scoring ruler comprises a ruler body, wherein the ruler body is vertically arranged, and a scoring table is arranged on one surface of the ruler body; the scoring table is divided into a plurality of equal divisions along the height direction of the ruler body, corresponding marks are arranged on the equal divisions, expressions corresponding to the marks are arranged on the scoring table, and the color of the scoring table gradually changes along the height direction; compared with the prior art, facial expressions are matched on the scoring table, so that the patient can quickly and intuitively understand the approximate degree of the pain degree, meanwhile, the self-reporting evaluation method is suitable for children with small ages and patients who cannot report themselves and are scored by behavior observation, the color gradually changes from green to red, and the patients can understand the pain severity more easily or judge the pain severity by combining with life general knowledge.

Description

Pain scoring ruler
Technical Field
The utility model belongs to the technical field of medical equipment, especially, relate to a painful chi of grading.
Background
Pain is a subjective experience that is difficult to objectively reflect with a measuring instrument, and quantitative analysis of this subjective feeling is essential for clinical work. The clinical work has been largely indirect assessment methods, i.e., methods that allow patients to self-describe or assess the nature and extent of pain present, without any painful stimuli being applied to the patient. Since indirect assessment methods are closely related to the age, reading level, language expression and cognitive ability of the patient, there are special requirements and methods for the assessment of pain for a particular population.
At present, indirect pain assessment methods mainly comprise:
1. visual simulation scoring method: a straight line with the length of 10cm is adopted, the two ends of the straight line are respectively marked with 'no pain' and 'most severe pain', and a certain point on the straight line is marked by a patient according to the pain degree felt by the patient so as to show the pain intensity and psychological impact. The length of the distance from the origin to the mark is the amount of pain.
2. Oral description scoring method: adjectives are used to describe the intensity of pain, usually in order from least pain to most pain, with each adjective having a corresponding score to facilitate quantitative analysis of pain.
3. Digital scoring method: this method requires the patient to describe the intensity of the pain with 11 points, 0 to 10. 0 indicates no pain, points increase when pain is stronger, and 10 indicates the most severe pain.
4. Facial expression scoring method: the 6 different manifestations of faceting, from happy to sad and crying, were used to select the face that best expressed his pain.
Among them, the VAS pain scoring method is flexible and simple, can more intuitively reflect the change of pain and the alleviation degree thereof, and is the most common pain intensity determination method in clinic at present. The NRS pain scoring method is expressed in a digital form, is simple and practical and has high reliability and effectiveness. The pain modulating means for analgesic drugs and non-pharmacological effects VAS method is highly correlated with NRS method results. However, both have certain disadvantages, for example, it is difficult for patients with perceptual dyskinesia to perform VAS, and VAS cannot be applied to patients who cannot respond immediately or understand the interpretation of the assessment. The NRS algorithm is applicable to patients with higher cultural degree. The oral scoring method is clear and concrete in expression, but is easily influenced by factors such as cultural degree and dialect. The FPS-R method is recommended for young children and for patients who are unable to self-report and are scored by behavioral observations.
China still has great urban and rural difference in cultural degree of old patients in developing countries, and some patients are still in illiterate state, so that great obstacles and misunderstandings may exist for understanding and communicating, when NRS scoring or VAS scoring is used in clinical work, a great amount of time for explanation and communication may be spent, and some patients cannot understand even at all, so that the working efficiency is low, pain scoring is difficult or an effective and accurate scoring process cannot be performed.
SUMMERY OF THE UTILITY MODEL
The utility model relates to an overcome the defect among the above-mentioned prior art, provide a metaphor image, understand fast, the painful chi of grading of accurate aassessment.
In order to achieve the above purpose, the utility model adopts the technical scheme that: the pain scoring ruler comprises a ruler body, wherein the ruler body is vertically arranged, and a scoring table is arranged on one surface of the ruler body; the scoring table is divided into a plurality of equal divisions along the height direction of the ruler body, corresponding marks are arranged on the equal divisions, expressions corresponding to the marks are arranged on the scoring table, and the color of the scoring table gradually changes along the height direction.
As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the mark of the bottom of the scoring table is 0, and the mark value gradually increases along the height direction of the scoring table.
As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the score table marked as 0 is displayed in green, and the top of the score table is displayed in red.
As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the color of the scoring table is gradually changed from green marked as bottom to red marked as top.
As an optimized scheme of the utility model, the scoring table expression is corresponding with the mark, and expression and mark are located the homonymy of scoring table.
As a preferred scheme of the present invention, the expression color of the mark is consistent with the color of the score table corresponding to the mark.
As a preferred scheme of the utility model, the opposite side of scoring table is equipped with a plurality of prompts, and a plurality of prompts set up along the direction of height of scoring table, and the prompt is corresponding with the mark.
As an optimized proposal of the utility model, the scale is arranged on the other side of the ruler body and is positioned on the edge of the ruler body.
As a preferred scheme of the utility model, still be equipped with mathematics scoring, facial expression scoring and sign on the ruler body another side.
As a preferred scheme of the utility model, the scoring table is divided into 6 grades from bottom to top, which are none, very low, middle-lower, middle-upper, very high and top respectively.
The beneficial effects of the utility model are that, compare with prior art: the grading table is matched with facial expressions, so that the patient can quickly and intuitively understand the approximate degree of the pain degree, meanwhile, the grading table is suitable for children with small ages and patients who can not report by themselves and can be graded by behavioral observation, the color gradually changes from green to red, and the patients can more easily understand or judge the pain severity degree by combining with living general knowledge.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a front view of the present invention;
fig. 2 is a back view of the present invention;
reference numbers in the figures: scoring table A, cue B, and label C.
Detailed Description
The following describes embodiments of the present invention in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
As shown in fig. 1-2, the pain scoring ruler comprises a ruler body, which is vertically arranged, and a scoring table A is arranged on one side of the ruler body; the scoring table A is divided into a plurality of equal divisions along the height direction of the ruler body, the bottom of the scoring table A is marked as 0, 1 is gradually added to each equal division along the height direction of the scoring table A, and the distances between the adjacent equal divisions are the same; the expression corresponding to the mark is arranged on the scoring table A, and the color of the scoring table A gradually changes along the height direction.
The number of the equal parts of the scoring table A is designed according to actual needs, the number of the equal parts of the scoring table A is usually divided into 11 equal parts or 6 equal parts, when the number of the equal parts of the scoring table A is 6, the top of the scoring table A is marked as 6, each mark corresponds to one expression, when the number of the equal parts of the scoring table A is 11, the top of the scoring table A is marked as 11, each equal part is provided with one mark, each mark corresponds to one expression, and the number of the equal parts is designed according to the actual needs.
The expression corresponding to the mark is arranged on the scoring table A, the color of the scoring table A gradually changes along the height direction, the scoring table A marked at 0 is green, the top of the scoring table A is displayed in red, and the color of the scoring table A is gradually changed from the green marked at 0 to the red marked at 6.
The label of the scoring table A is in a gradient color from green to red from 0 to the other end of the scoring table A, a user can observe the label visually conveniently, the scoring table A is vertically arranged, the mark and the expression are located on one side of the scoring table A, the positions of the marking positions of the scoring table A are provided with the expressions, the expressions and the marks are located on the same side of the scoring table A, and the colors of the expressions are consistent with the colors of the scoring table A at the position of the label.
The expression marks 0-6 gradually change from smiling to usual to painful, so that the patient can more easily understand and judge the pain severity.
The scale evaluation table A is characterized in that 3 prompts B are arranged on one side of the scale evaluation table A, 4 prompts B are arranged along the height direction of the scale evaluation table A, when the scale evaluation table A is 6 equal parts, the 3 prompts B are respectively positioned on the scales of 0-2, 2-4 and 4-6, the corresponding prompt B above the scale of 0-2 is slight pain and is not influenced by sleep, the corresponding prompt B above the scales of 2-4 is moderate pain and slightly influenced by sleep, the corresponding prompt B above the scales of 4-6 is severe pain and seriously influenced by sleep and is painful and waken at night, the language mode of the prompt B can be designed according to actual needs, and the position of the prompt B is designed according to the equal division condition of the actual scale evaluation table A.
Meanwhile, the corresponding scales are marked with 6 different grades which are respectively zero, very low, middle-lower, middle-upper, very high and top ends, the scales are not corresponding to the scale 0, the very low corresponds to the scale 1, the middle-lower corresponds to the scale 2, the middle-upper corresponds to the scale 3, the middle-upper corresponds to the scale 4, the very high corresponds to the scale 5, and the top end corresponds to the scale 6.
The scale body is provided with scales on the other side relative to the scoring table A, the scales are located on the edge of the scale body, so that a clinician can conveniently measure the length as a measuring tool, and the scale body of the surface is also provided with a mathematical scoring method and a facial expression scoring method, so that an operator can conveniently observe the scale body.
The ruler body is also provided with a mark C which is used for displaying the name of a hospital and is convenient for distinguishing the owners of the ruler body.
The previous description of the disclosed embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention; thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
Although the reference numerals in the figures are used more here: scoring the terms table a, cue B, logo C, etc., but not excluding the possibility of using other terms; these terms are used merely to more conveniently describe and explain the nature of the present invention; they are to be construed in a manner that is inconsistent with the spirit of the invention.

Claims (10)

1. The pain scoring ruler comprises a ruler body and is characterized in that the ruler body is vertically arranged, and a scoring table (A) is arranged on one surface of the ruler body; the scoring table (A) is divided into a plurality of equal parts along the height direction of the ruler body, corresponding marks are arranged on the equal parts, expressions corresponding to the marks are arranged on the scoring table (A), and the color of the scoring table (A) is gradually changed along the height direction.
2. A pain scale according to claim 1, wherein the bottom of the scale (a) is marked with 0, and the value of the mark gradually increases every equal point along the height of the scale (a).
3. A pain scale according to claim 2, wherein the scale (a) marked 0 is displayed in green and the top of the scale (a) is displayed in red.
4. A pain scale according to claim 1, wherein the colour of the scale (a) is a gradient from green labelled at the bottom to red at the top.
5. A pain scale according to claim 4, wherein the expression of the scale (A) corresponds to the indicia and the expression and indicia are on the same side of the scale (A).
6. A pain scale according to claim 5 wherein the marker is in the same color as the color of the scale (A) to which the marker corresponds.
7. A pain rating scale according to claim 5, wherein the other side of the rating form (A) is provided with a plurality of cues (B) arranged along the height direction of the rating form (A), and the cues (B) correspond to the marks.
8. The pain scoring ruler of claim 1, wherein the ruler body is provided with a scale on the other side, the scale being located on the edge of the ruler body.
9. A pain scoring ruler according to claim 8, wherein the ruler body is further provided with mathematical scoring, facial expression scoring and markers (C) on the other side.
10. A pain scale according to claim 1, wherein the scoring table (a) is divided into 6 grades from bottom to top, none, very low, mid-high and top respectively.
CN201920370399.0U 2019-03-22 2019-03-22 Pain scoring ruler Active CN210130820U (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201920370399.0U CN210130820U (en) 2019-03-22 2019-03-22 Pain scoring ruler

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201920370399.0U CN210130820U (en) 2019-03-22 2019-03-22 Pain scoring ruler

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN210130820U true CN210130820U (en) 2020-03-10

Family

ID=69702788

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201920370399.0U Active CN210130820U (en) 2019-03-22 2019-03-22 Pain scoring ruler

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN210130820U (en)

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5692500A (en) Pain measurement and recording tool and method
Krage et al. Cormack–Lehane classification revisited
US5018531A (en) Skin blemish measuring and recording system and method
US5018526A (en) Apparatus and method for providing a multidimensional indication of pain
Howells Neanderthals: Names, hypotheses, and scientific method
CN104540448A (en) Methods and assessment scales for measuring wrinkle severity
US20080143962A1 (en) Method and apparatus for marking eyeglass lens for placement of reading segment
CN210130820U (en) Pain scoring ruler
Kovacs et al. A comparison of a fiberoptic stylet and a bougie as adjuncts to direct laryngoscopy in a manikin-simulated difficult airway
Manthei The response-shift bias in a counsellor education programme
JP2005013713A (en) Measurement of attention function, and method and apparatus for learning attention function
Finlayson et al. New Zealand nurses' reports on hospital care: an international comparison.
CN204410971U (en) A kind of portable multifunctional pain scores plate
Culkin et al. Sex-role orientation of nursing students at a community college
Coy The Bender Visual-Motor Gestalt Test as a predictor of academic achievement
Murdock A critical evaluation of the Barthel Index, part 1
CN217118437U (en) Improved vertigo visual color simulation assessment ruler
Darakjian et al. Comparative validities of standardized academic self-concept scales and achievement test measures and of teacher ratings of citizenship and effort in forecasting performance of junior high school students
Visscher Validity and purpose of in-training examination in obstetrics and gynecology, 1979–1982
CN220988772U (en) Pain assessment tool for children
CN115736838A (en) Integrated pain assessment ruler and use method thereof
JP3944363B2 (en) Colored tools and mental state analysis set for mental state analysis
CN217659829U (en) Visual assessment tool for headache
CN211374495U (en) Gynecological patient bleeding identification color card
CN219070274U (en) Integrated pain evaluation ruler

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant