CN1187296A - Method for control of resistant populations of lepidoptera - Google Patents
Method for control of resistant populations of lepidoptera Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN1187296A CN1187296A CN97126236A CN97126236A CN1187296A CN 1187296 A CN1187296 A CN 1187296A CN 97126236 A CN97126236 A CN 97126236A CN 97126236 A CN97126236 A CN 97126236A CN 1187296 A CN1187296 A CN 1187296A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- flufenoxuron
- lepidopterous insects
- resistance
- resistant strain
- lepidoptera
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Abstract
There is provided a method for the control of resistant populations of Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae such as Cydia pomonella (L.), Laspeyresia pomonella (L.) Grapholitha molesta (Busck), and the like and the protection of fruit crops therefrom which comprises contacting said Lepidoptera with a toxic amount of flufenoxuron.
Description
The lepidopterous insects of drinking water fruit is worldwide important pests.Owing to increase the go-on-go expense before the packing and increase the infection possibility in busy season subsequently.Even the very little infection of its percentage is also much bigger than the monetary value of fruit economically.Survive the winter larva from entering the fruit after blooming after hibernation-like state is sprouted wings, cause breeding for the first time.In the season of growth, nearly 3 times breeding can appear, and impel the Lepidoptera population that the extraneous toxin as insecticide is produced resistance.
Though numerous insecticides can be prevented and treated lepidopterous insects effectively, need frequently use mostly.As a result, as the multiplication of Lepidoptera resistance (pesticide resistance) insect of anti-acylureas, anti-pyrethroid and anti-organic phosphor, grievous injury the effect of insecticide.
Therefore, the purpose of this invention is to provide the high efficiency compound of preventing and treating the useful uniqueness of pesticide resistance Lepidoptera population.
Another object of the present invention provides the enhancing fruit trees protection, avoids the lepidopterous insects invasion of anti-acylureas, anti-pyrethroid and anti-organic phosphor and the method for burst.
Advantage of the present invention is that its method of preventing and treating resistance Lepidoptera population is harmless to useful caste, and quite gentle to environmental activity.
These and other feature of the present invention and purpose will be clear from detailed description hereinafter.
Summary of the invention
The invention provides the method for preventing and treating the resistance lepidopterous insects; comprise 1-(4-(the 2-chloro-α that makes described lepidopterous insects, its habitat, multiplication plot or provand contact dosis toxica; α, α-three fluoro-is to toloxyl)-the 2-fluorophenyl)-3-(2, the 6-difluoro benzoyl) urea (flufenoxuron).
The present invention also provide one strengthen vegetative period and harvest time fruit tree avoid that the resistance lepidopterous insects is invaded and harassed and the method for the protective effect of burst, comprise the flufenoxuron of the container of the soil of described fruit tree or its growth and water or its storage being used effective dose.
The detailed description of invention
Resistance is a phenomenon that extensively exists, and can find the resistant strain population of much important economically insect at present.Acylureas, pyrethroid and organic phosphor there are the lepidopterous insects of resistance worldwide fruit trees protection has been proposed a serious problem.
Herein, resistance is defined as: insect population is to heritable reduction of insecticide effect susceptibility, and this reduction is expressed as and is exposed to insecticide the influence of each insect is reduced (each initial with same population or last time viewed drug effect of drug effect is compared) with number of times.
Known benzoyl urea compounds (as United States Patent (USP) 4,666,942 is described) is effective to the control of insect and mite.But, find that now particular compound 1-(4-(α-three fluoro-is to toloxyl for 2-chloro-α, α)-2-fluorophenyl)-3-(2, the 6-difluoro benzoyl) urea (flufenoxuron) antagonism Lepidoptera population is but highly efficacious.In specification and claims, term " pesticide resistance population " refers to the population of anti-acylureas, anti-pyrethroid, anti-carbamate, anti-phenylhydrazide and/or anti-organic phosphor.
Surprising is, resistance Lepidoptera population, as this purpose Olethreutidae such as codling moth (Cydiapomonella (L.)), codling moth (Laspeyresla pomonella (L.)), oriental fruit moth (Grapholithamolesta (Busck)) etc., being preferably codling moth (Cydia pomonella (L.)) can be by contacting described pesticide resistance lepidopterous insects, its habitat, multiplication plot or provand and prevented and treated with the flufenoxuron of dosis toxica.Surprising especially is that the Lepidoptera population of acyl urea compound flufenoxuron antagonism acylureas is still effective.
Flufenoxuron be applied to strengthen fruit tree (preferable be the operatic circle and drupe, as apple, pears, Wen Quince, apricot, peach and Lee, better be the operatic circle, as apple and pears) avoid as described in the protective effect of the invasion and attack of pesticide resistance Lepidoptera and infection institute induced damage resistive.The method of preventing and treating pesticide resistance Lepidoptera and cover crop with the present invention is harmless to useful caste, is specially adapted to the responsibility governing plan of insect.
The effective dose of used flufenoxuron compound changes according to the characteristic of the mode of being used, the resistance lepidopterous insects that will prevent and treat, the degree of invasion, controlling object host's kind, the time of using, weather condition etc. in the inventive method.Certainly, can use effective dose, but not be to protect the control crop to avoid the pesticide resistance Lepidoptera to encroach on necessary greater than the flufenoxuron compound.
In practice, be scattered in the water or the about 10ppm-10 in other cheap liquid-carrier, (be preferably about 100ppm-5,000ppm) flufenoxuron compound administration of the present invention generally is effective in pesticide resistance lepidopterous insects, its habitat, multiplication plot or provand to 000ppm.Flufenoxuron compound of the present invention is applied to leaf, withe, flower or the fruit of crop with the consumption of about 5.0g/hL-50g/hL (being preferably about 5.0g/hL-15g/hL), or the soil of its growth or water, or the container of results fruit storage, also be effective for preventing and treating pesticide resistance lepidopterous insects (particularly codling moth).
Advantageously, flufenoxuron compound of the present invention can impose separately to be prevented and treated in the pesticide resistance lepidopterous insects, also can merge with other biological or chemical pest control agent (as other insecticide, bactericide, weed killer herbicide etc.) and use.
The flufenoxuron compound of using effective dose can strengthen fruit tree and avoid the protective effect that resistance lepidopterous insects (particularly codling moth) infects and attacks.Forms such as described compound can spray agent, pulvis, wetting powder, granule are used.Suitable composition comprises that the flufenoxuron compound of effective dose and agricultural go up acceptable inert fluid or solid carrier.
For to clearer understanding of the present invention, now be described below specific embodiment.These embodiment only are illustrative, must not be interpreted as the restriction to the scope of the invention and basic principle.In fact, except the content that this paper set forth and described, to those skilled in the art, various improvement of the present invention can become clear from the description of the following examples and front.This improvement has also been listed in the scope of claims.
Embodiment 1
Flufenoxuron is an Evaluation on effect to sensitive strain and the anti-medicine of codling moth
This evaluation test system breeds the codling moth (is responsive, and another is for there being pesticide resistance) of two strains on artificial bio-membrane's medium.Sensitive strain (S) derives from the source that the laboratory keeps, and resistant strain (R) derives from the field of observing the pesticide resistance level, then remains in the laboratory with the decis selection pressure.Test is carried out on the larva that is put on the treated medium.With being mixed with 100g/L (CASCADE
100 DC) flufenoxuron of dispersed concentrating agents (DC) is handled.Handling the back observed 7 days.The data of gained are analyzed with standard probit method, to determine each strain of codling moth ((R) and (S)) required lethal concentration (LC) (LC of 90% lethality
90) and respectively be the concentration (LC of 50% lethality
50).The results are shown in Table I.
Table I
Flufenoxuron is other LC to the virulence codling moth of responsive system of codling moth and resistance system
90(ppm) LC
50(ppm) S 11.72 3.29R 12.95 3.85
As shown in Table I, between the resistance of codling moth system and responsive system, do not observe sensitivity differences to flufenoxuron.Resistance to flufenoxuron compares LC
50(R)/LC
50(L) be 1.17.By comparison, the resistance ratio that records in the same test to decis is about 50, and diflubenzuron resistance ratio is about 10,000.
The comparative example 2
The field recruitment evaluation of test-compound antagonism codling moth
In these assessments, selecting has highly drug-fast field to diflubenzuron, decis or zolone.All tests are carried out on the unlimited field that resistance codling moth population is arranged.Handle with following commercial preparation:
The present invention
Flufenoxuron-CASCADE
TM100 DC (100g/L can disperse concentrating agents)
Control compounds
Azinphos-methyl-GUSATHION
TMXL 25%WP (250g/kg wetting powder)
Diflubenzuron-DIMILIN
TM25%WP (250g/kg wetting powder)
Teflubenzuron-DART
TM150 EC (150g/L concentrated suspension)
Decis-DECIS
TM25 EC (25g/L emulsifiable concentrates)
Each field experiment is all with tabular report independently.Control compounds uses the consumption suitable with the commercial quantities of recommending to test.Therefore, for sensitive varieties, the % effect value of expectation will be 80%-100%.The result is reported as the % effect, refers to that fruit attacked the percentage that frequency reduces.
In order to estimate this % effect on every splat (be untreated and handle), the sum (T) and the affected fruit number (A) of counting fruit.Being soaked the percentage of attacking fruit is calculated as follows:
Table II
Test-compound protection apple is avoided acylureas
Land for growing field crops assessment active component dosage g/hL % effect %A (being untreated) flufenoxuron 10.0 92-azinphos-methyls 43.75 89-diflubenzurons 10.0 23-Teflubenzurons 5.0 63 of resistant strain codling moth institute induced damage resistive-be untreated 0.0-49.9
Table III
Test-compound protection apple is avoided acylureas
The land for growing field crops assessment of resistant strain codling moth institute induced damage resistive
Active component dosage g/hL % effect %A (being untreated)
Flufenoxuron 10.0 95-
Azinphos-methyl 43.75 87-
Diflubenzuron 10.0 24-
Be untreated 0.0-12.6
Shown in Table II and III, in above-mentioned field experiment, in the codling moth area that diflubenzuron is had high resistance, flufenoxuron shows efficient to the acylureas resistant strain of codling moth.
Table IV
Test-compound protection apple is avoided pyrethroid
The land for growing field crops assessment of resistant strain codling moth institute induced damage resistive
Active component dosage g/hL % effect %A (being untreated)
Flufenoxuron 10.0 73-
Azinphos-methyl 43.75 69-
Decis 0.75 22-
Be untreated 0.0-61.9
In this area, very high to the resistance of decis.As shown in above-mentioned Table IV, confirm that flufenoxuron antagonism decis strain has fine protective effect.
Table V
Test-compound protection apple is avoided organic phosphor
The land for growing field crops assessment of resistant strain codling moth institute induced damage resistive
Active component dosage g/hL % effect %A (being untreated)
Flufenoxuron 10.0 86-
Zolone 60.0 10-
Be untreated 0.0-99.1
In this test insect district occurred frequently, very high to the resistance of zolone.Can find out that from above-mentioned Table V flufenoxuron has efficiently for anti-zolone strain.
Claims (10)
1. prevent and treat the method for pesticide resistance lepidopterous insects, comprise described lepidopterous insects, its habitat, multiplication plot or bait place are contacted with the flufenoxuron of poisonous strength.
2. the method for claim 1, wherein lepidopterous insects is acylureas resistant strain, pyrethroid resistant strain and organic phosphor resistant strain.
3. the method for claim 1, wherein lepidopterous insects is an Olethreutidae.
4. strengthen vegetative period and harvest time the fruit crop avoid that the pesticide resistance lepidopterous insects infects and the method for the protective effect of invasion and attack, comprise the flufenoxuron of the soil of described crop or its growth and water or its hiding place being used effective dose.
5. method as claimed in claim 4, wherein fruit tree is the operatic circle or drupe.
6. method as claimed in claim 5, wherein the operatic circle and drupe are selected from the group of apple, pears, Wen Quince, apricot, peach and Li Zucheng.
7. method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the flufenoxuron compound is used with the consumption of about 5.0g/hL-50g/hL.
8. method as claimed in claim 7, wherein the flufenoxuron compound is used with the consumption of about 5.0g/hL-15g/hL.
9. as claim 1,2 or 4 described methods, wherein lepidopterous insects is a codling moth.
10. as claim 2 or 4 described methods, wherein lepidopterous insects is the acylureas resistant strain.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN97126236A CN1187296A (en) | 1997-01-06 | 1997-12-30 | Method for control of resistant populations of lepidoptera |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FR9700060 | 1997-01-06 | ||
CN97126236A CN1187296A (en) | 1997-01-06 | 1997-12-30 | Method for control of resistant populations of lepidoptera |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN1187296A true CN1187296A (en) | 1998-07-15 |
Family
ID=5177603
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN97126236A Pending CN1187296A (en) | 1997-01-06 | 1997-12-30 | Method for control of resistant populations of lepidoptera |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN1187296A (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN100360030C (en) * | 2005-08-12 | 2008-01-09 | 南京第一农药有限公司 | Synergistic compound pesticide contg. high efficiency cyfluthrin and flufenoxuron |
-
1997
- 1997-12-30 CN CN97126236A patent/CN1187296A/en active Pending
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN100360030C (en) * | 2005-08-12 | 2008-01-09 | 南京第一农药有限公司 | Synergistic compound pesticide contg. high efficiency cyfluthrin and flufenoxuron |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Sanchez-Bayo et al. | Impacts of pesticides on honey bees | |
Aziz et al. | Comparative efficacy of different strategies for management of spotted bollworms, Earias spp. on Okra, Abelmoschus esculentus (L). Moench | |
Glen et al. | Production and field evaluation of codling moth granulosis virus for control of Cydia pomonella in the United Kingdom | |
Cuthbertson et al. | The impact of fungicides to control apple scab (Venturia inaequalis) on the predatory mite Anystis baccarum and its prey Aculus schlechtendali (apple rust mite) in Northern Ireland Bramley orchards | |
Nayak | Psocid and mite pests of stored commodities: small but formidable enemies | |
Reddy et al. | Comparative evaluation of novel acaricides against two spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch. infesting cucumber (Cucumis sativus) under laboratory and green house conditions | |
Carter et al. | Biological control of Eutypa armeniacae. III.* A comparison of chemical, biological and integrated control | |
Raudonis | Comparative toxicity of spirodiclofen and lambdacihalotrin to Tetranychus urticae, Tarsonemus pallidus and predatory mite Amblyseius andersoni in a strawberry site under field conditions | |
CN1108099C (en) | Insecticidal and miticidal compositions | |
CN1187296A (en) | Method for control of resistant populations of lepidoptera | |
Kwon | Change of abundance of arthropods in pine forests caused by aerial insecticide spray | |
Rahman et al. | Development of integrated pest management approaches against Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) in tomato. | |
Abbas | Efficacy of two biopesticides and two chemical pesticides against green peach aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer)(Homoptera: Aphididae) under laboratory condition | |
McGaughey | BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS FOR MOTH CONTROL IN STORED WHEAT12 | |
Hoyt | Studies on integrated control of Panonychus ulmi in New Zealand apple orchards | |
Klingauf | Are feasible methods for an ecological pest control in view? | |
Livingston et al. | Effect of insecticides, fungicides, and insecticide-fungicide combinations on development of lepidopterous larval populations in soybean | |
AU729229B2 (en) | Method for the control of resistant populations of lepidoptera | |
Clesceri et al. | Environmental control of pests and vectors | |
Vijayasree et al. | Efficacy and biosafety of new generation insecticides for the management of Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in brinjal and Earias vitella Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in okra | |
Kpindou et al. | Application of mixtures of Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum and cyhalothrin against the Senegalese grasshopper in Senegal | |
Nene et al. | Rebounding Ability of Weaver Ants, Oecophylla longinoda Latreille (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Cashew Farming Systems in Tanzania | |
Haran et al. | Safety studies on certain pesticides and biopesticides against green lacewing, Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi (Esben-Petersen) | |
Batco et al. | The sensitivity of some species of entomoacarifages to the insectocaricides used in the protection of apple culture | |
Metwally et al. | Studies on mechanical and chemical control of rodents at Assiut Governorate |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
C02 | Deemed withdrawal of patent application after publication (patent law 2001) | ||
WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication |