CN117973663A - Assessment method and device for emergency action judgment level, electronic equipment and medium - Google Patents
Assessment method and device for emergency action judgment level, electronic equipment and medium Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN117973663A CN117973663A CN202211296919.0A CN202211296919A CN117973663A CN 117973663 A CN117973663 A CN 117973663A CN 202211296919 A CN202211296919 A CN 202211296919A CN 117973663 A CN117973663 A CN 117973663A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- emergency action
- level
- action level
- initial
- staff
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 225
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 43
- 238000012911 target assessment Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 46
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y04—INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
- Y04S—SYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
- Y04S10/00—Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
- Y04S10/50—Systems or methods supporting the power network operation or management, involving a certain degree of interaction with the load-side end user applications
Landscapes
- Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)
Abstract
The disclosure provides an assessment method, an assessment device, electronic equipment and a medium for emergency action judgment level. The specific scheme is as follows: the method comprises the steps of obtaining a reference emergency action level and an initial emergency action level, wherein the initial emergency action level is provided with corresponding staff marks, comparing the reference emergency action level with the initial emergency action level to obtain comparison results, generating a target assessment result of each corresponding staff according to a plurality of comparison results of each staff, and generating the target assessment result of each corresponding staff due to the fact that the reference emergency action level is output by a pre-trained emergency action level judgment model, so that interference caused by assessment of the emergency action judgment level by other factors is avoided, consistency of assessment standards of the emergency action judgment level of the staff is guaranteed, and accuracy and referenceability of the emergency action judgment level assessment result of the staff in the nuclear power plant are effectively improved.
Description
Technical Field
The disclosure relates to the technical field of nuclear safety and nuclear emergency, in particular to an assessment method, an assessment device, electronic equipment and a medium for emergency action judgment level.
Background
The emergency action level is a specific and observable threshold value of the nuclear power plant, which is predetermined for a certain initial condition, and when the threshold value is met or exceeded, the nuclear power plant enters a corresponding emergency state level, and the emergency action level is an important basis for judging the emergency state level of the nuclear power plant, so that for smooth execution of emergency preparation work of the nuclear power plant, the emergency action level of the nuclear power plant needs to be accurately judged by staff of the nuclear power plant, and thus, the emergency action judgment level of the staff of the nuclear power plant has higher requirements.
Therefore, the emergency action judgment level of the nuclear power plant staff needs to be checked in time based on the same check standard so as to prompt the nuclear power plant staff to promote the emergency action judgment level of the nuclear power plant staff, thereby ensuring that the staff executing the emergency preparation work of the nuclear power plant can have higher emergency action judgment level.
Disclosure of Invention
The present disclosure aims to solve, at least to some extent, one of the technical problems in the related art.
Therefore, the purpose of the present disclosure is to provide an assessment method, an apparatus, an electronic device, and a storage medium for emergency action judgment level, which are used to generate a target assessment result for each corresponding staff due to the combination of the reference emergency action level output by the pre-trained emergency action level judgment model, so as to avoid interference generated by the assessment of the emergency action judgment level due to other factors, ensure the consistency of the assessment standard of the emergency action judgment level of the staff, and effectively promote the accuracy and the referenceability of the assessment result of the emergency action judgment level of the staff in a nuclear power plant.
An assessment method for emergency action judgment level provided by an embodiment of a first aspect of the present disclosure includes: obtaining a reference emergency action level and an initial emergency action level, wherein the initial emergency action level is provided with a corresponding staff mark, the initial emergency action level is obtained by judging staff marked by the staff mark according to initial operation data of the nuclear power plant, and the reference emergency action level is obtained by judging a pre-trained emergency action level judging model according to the initial operation data; comparing the reference emergency action level with the initial emergency action level to obtain a comparison result; and generating a target assessment result corresponding to each worker according to the corresponding multiple comparison results of each worker.
According to the assessment method for the emergency action judgment level, provided by the embodiment of the first aspect of the disclosure, the reference emergency action level and the initial emergency action level are obtained, wherein the initial emergency action level is provided with the corresponding staff identification, the staff identified by the staff identification is judged according to the initial operation data of the nuclear power plant, the reference emergency action level is obtained according to the initial operation data through the pre-trained emergency action level judgment model, the reference emergency action level and the initial emergency action level are compared to obtain comparison results, the target assessment result of each staff is generated according to the corresponding comparison results of each staff, and the target assessment result of each staff is generated due to the fact that the reference emergency action level is output by the pre-trained emergency action level judgment model, so that interference generated by the assessment of other factors on the emergency action judgment level is avoided, the consistency of the assessment standard of the staff emergency action judgment level is ensured, and the accuracy and the referenceability of the emergency action judgment level assessment result of the staff in the nuclear power plant are effectively improved.
An apparatus for checking emergency action judgment level according to an embodiment of a second aspect of the present disclosure includes: the system comprises an acquisition module, a pre-training emergency action level judgment module and a pre-training emergency action level judgment module, wherein the acquisition module is used for acquiring a reference emergency action level and an initial emergency action level, the initial emergency action level is provided with a corresponding staff mark, the initial emergency action level is obtained by judging staff marked by the staff mark according to initial operation data of a nuclear power plant, and the reference emergency action level is obtained by judging a pre-training emergency action level judgment model according to the initial operation data; the comparison module is used for comparing the reference emergency action level with the initial emergency action level to obtain a comparison result; the generating module is used for generating a target assessment result corresponding to each worker according to a plurality of comparison results corresponding to each worker.
According to the assessment device for the emergency action judgment level, provided by the embodiment of the second aspect of the disclosure, the reference emergency action level and the initial emergency action level are obtained, wherein the initial emergency action level is provided with the corresponding staff identification, the staff identified by the staff identification is judged according to the initial operation data of the nuclear power plant, the reference emergency action level is obtained according to the initial operation data through the pre-trained emergency action level judgment model, the reference emergency action level and the initial emergency action level are compared to obtain comparison results, and then the target assessment result of each staff is generated according to the corresponding comparison results of each staff.
An embodiment of a third aspect of the present disclosure provides an electronic device, including a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and capable of running on the processor, where the processor executes the program to implement an assessment method for determining an emergency action level according to the embodiment of the first aspect of the present disclosure.
An embodiment of a fourth aspect of the present disclosure proposes a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, which when executed by a processor implements an assessment method of an emergency action judgment level as proposed by an embodiment of the first aspect of the present disclosure.
An embodiment of a fifth aspect of the present disclosure proposes a computer program product which, when executed by an instruction processor in the computer program product, performs an assessment method of an emergency action judgment level as proposed by an embodiment of the first aspect of the present disclosure.
Additional aspects and advantages of the disclosure will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the disclosure.
Drawings
The foregoing and/or additional aspects and advantages of the present disclosure will become apparent and readily appreciated from the following description of the embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of an assessment method for determining emergency action level according to an embodiment of the disclosure;
FIG. 2 is a flow chart of an assessment method for emergency action determination level according to another embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of an apparatus for checking emergency action determination level according to an embodiment of the disclosure;
Fig. 4 illustrates a block diagram of an exemplary electronic device suitable for use in implementing embodiments of the present disclosure.
Detailed Description
Embodiments of the present disclosure are described in detail below, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings, wherein like or similar reference numerals refer to like or similar elements or elements having like or similar functions throughout. The embodiments described below by referring to the drawings are exemplary only for explaining the present disclosure and are not to be construed as limiting the present disclosure. On the contrary, the embodiments of the disclosure include all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of an assessment method for determining emergency action level according to an embodiment of the disclosure.
It should be noted that, the execution body of the method for checking the emergency action determination level in this embodiment is an apparatus for checking the emergency action determination level, and the apparatus may be implemented in a software and/or hardware manner, and the apparatus may be configured in an electronic device, where the electronic device may include, but is not limited to, a terminal, a server, and the like.
As shown in fig. 1, the method for checking the emergency action judgment level includes:
s101: a reference emergency action level and an initial emergency action level are obtained.
The initial emergency action level is obtained by judging the staff identified by the staff identification according to initial operation data of the nuclear power plant, and the reference emergency action level is obtained by judging a pre-trained emergency action level judging model according to the initial operation data.
In the embodiment of the disclosure, the initial operation data may be data such as parameters of the nuclear power plant equipment in the current state, parameters of the nuclear power plant system, parameters of the nuclear power plant instrument and the like, which are read when the equipment of the nuclear power plant fails or a human operation error occurs, as the initial operation data, and the initial operation data is not limited.
That is, in the embodiment of the present disclosure, a corresponding data transmission interface may be provided in advance by an assessment device of an emergency action determination level, and via the data transmission interface, an emergency action level obtained by a staff member according to initial operation data of a nuclear power plant may be obtained as an initial emergency action level, and a pre-trained emergency action level determination model may be obtained via the data transmission interface, and then, a reference emergency action level obtained by determining according to the initial operation data may be assessed based on the reference emergency action level.
Alternatively, in some embodiments, the reference emergency action level may be obtained by obtaining initial operation data of the nuclear power plant, and inputting the initial operation data into the pre-trained emergency action level determination model to obtain the reference emergency action level output by the pre-trained emergency action level determination model.
That is, in the embodiment of the present disclosure, initial operation data of the nuclear power plant may be acquired, and the initial operation data may be input into the pre-trained emergency action level determination model, so as to acquire a reference emergency action level output by the pre-trained emergency action level determination model, thereby ensuring that the initial emergency action level and the reference emergency action level are determined according to the same operation data, and effectively improving the referenceability of the reference emergency action level.
S102: and comparing the reference emergency action level with the initial emergency action level to obtain a comparison result.
After the reference emergency action level and the initial emergency action level are acquired, the reference emergency action level and the initial emergency action level can be compared to obtain a comparison result, and then, based on the comparison result, an assessment method for executing subsequent emergency action judgment levels can be triggered, and particularly, the following embodiment can be referred to.
Optionally, in some embodiments, the reference emergency action level and the initial emergency action level are compared to obtain a comparison result, where the comparison result is determined to be passing when the reference emergency action level and the initial emergency action level are the same, and the comparison result is determined to be failing when the reference emergency action level and the initial emergency action level are different.
That is, in the embodiment of the present disclosure, the initial emergency action level and the reference emergency action level may be compared, and when the reference emergency action level and the initial emergency action level are the same, the comparison result is determined to be passing, and when the reference emergency action level and the initial emergency action level are different, the comparison result is determined to be not passing.
S103: and generating a target assessment result corresponding to each worker according to the corresponding multiple comparison results of each worker.
In the embodiment of the disclosure, after comparing the reference emergency action level and the initial emergency action level to obtain the comparison result, an assessment result corresponding to each worker may be generated according to a plurality of comparison results corresponding to each worker, where the assessment result may be referred to as a target assessment result, and the assessment result may specifically be, for example, an assessment score, which is not limited.
In some embodiments, the generating the target assessment result of each corresponding worker according to the corresponding plurality of comparison results of each worker may be determining that the target assessment result of the corresponding worker is that the emergency action judgment level assessment does not pass when the corresponding plurality of comparison result indications of the worker, the reference emergency action level and the initial emergency action level are different times and are greater than the time threshold.
Or when the corresponding comparison result indications of the staff members are the same, the same times are accumulated when the reference emergency action level and the initial emergency action level are the same, so that the corresponding accumulated times of each staff member are obtained, the assessment score of the corresponding emergency action judgment level of each staff member is generated according to the accumulated times, and the assessment score is used as the target assessment result of the corresponding staff member, so that the method is not limited.
For example, in a preset period of time, the staff a may determine the obtained 10 initial emergency action levels according to the initial operation data of the nuclear power plant, and compare the reference emergency action level with the initial emergency action level to obtain 10 comparison results, where the 6 comparison results show that the reference emergency action level is the same as the initial emergency action level, so that it may be determined that the assessment score of the emergency action determination level of the staff a is 60 points, which is not limited.
In the embodiment, the reference emergency action level and the initial emergency action level are obtained, wherein the initial emergency action level is provided with corresponding staff marks, staff marked by the staff marks are judged according to initial operation data of the nuclear power plant, the reference emergency action level is obtained through the judgment of the initial operation data according to the pre-trained emergency action level judgment model, the reference emergency action level and the initial emergency action level are compared to obtain comparison results, and then the target assessment result of each staff is generated according to a plurality of corresponding comparison results of each staff, and the target assessment result of each staff is generated due to the fact that the reference emergency action level is output by the pre-trained emergency action level judgment model.
FIG. 2 is a flow chart of an assessment method for emergency action determination level according to another embodiment of the present disclosure.
As shown in fig. 2, the method for checking the emergency action determination level includes:
S201: a reference emergency action level and an initial emergency action level are obtained.
S202: and comparing the reference emergency action level with the initial emergency action level to obtain a comparison result.
The descriptions of S201 to S202 may be specifically referred to the above embodiments, and are not repeated herein.
S203: and determining a first number of comparison results of each worker in a preset time period.
The preset time period may be, for example, a certain preset checking time period, which is not limited.
The number of comparison results of each worker in the preset time period can be called a first number.
That is, in the embodiment of the present disclosure, the total number of comparison results between the obtained initial emergency activity level and the reference emergency activity level may be determined by each staff member in the preset period, and the total number is taken as the first number.
S204: and determining that the corresponding comparison result of each staff in the preset time period is a second number which does not pass the comparison.
Wherein, the number of comparison results that the initial emergency action level and the reference emergency action level of each worker do not pass through is called as a second number in a preset time period.
That is, in the embodiment of the present disclosure, when it is determined that the reference emergency action level is different from the initial emergency action level in the preset time period, the different times may be accumulated to determine the second number that the corresponding comparison result of each staff in the preset time period is that the comparison is not passed, which is not limited.
S205: and determining target assessment results of the corresponding staff according to the first quantity and the second quantity.
According to the embodiment of the disclosure, after the first quantity of the comparison results of each worker in the preset time period is determined, and the second quantity of the comparison failure of the corresponding comparison result of each worker in the preset time period is determined, the target assessment result of the corresponding worker can be determined according to the first quantity and the second quantity.
Optionally, in some embodiments, the determining the target assessment result of the corresponding staff member according to the first number and the second number may be determining a ratio value between the second number and the first number, and determining that the target assessment result of the corresponding staff member is not passed when the ratio value is greater than or equal to the ratio threshold value, and determining that the target assessment result of the corresponding staff member is passed when the ratio value is less than the ratio threshold value.
That is, in the embodiment of the present disclosure, the total number of times of the initial emergency action level obtained by the judgment of the staff and the proportional value between the same number of times of the initial emergency action level and the reference emergency action level may be determined in the preset time period, the proportional value is compared with the predetermined proportional threshold, when the proportional value is greater than or equal to the proportional threshold, it is determined that the target assessment result of the corresponding staff is not passed, and when the proportional value is less than the proportional threshold, it is determined that the target assessment result of the corresponding staff is passed.
S206: and displaying the target examination result of each staff.
In the embodiment of the disclosure, after the target assessment results of the corresponding staff are determined according to the first number and the second number, the target assessment results of each staff may be displayed (for example, the target assessment results of each staff may be transmitted to a display screen to be displayed, which is not limited), so that the target assessment results of each staff may be more intuitively known, and the emergency level judgment work of the nuclear power plant may be adjusted based on the target assessment results of each staff, so that smooth performance of emergency preparation work of the nuclear power plant may be effectively ensured.
In the embodiment of the disclosure, the reference emergency action level and the initial emergency action level are obtained, the reference emergency action level and the initial emergency action level are compared to obtain the comparison result, the first quantity of the comparison result of each worker in the preset time period is determined, the corresponding comparison result of each worker in the preset time period is the second quantity which is not passed by the comparison result, the target assessment result of the corresponding worker is determined according to the first quantity and the second quantity, and the target assessment result of each worker is displayed, so that the target assessment result of each worker can be obtained more intuitively, the emergency level judgment work of the nuclear power plant can be adjusted based on the target assessment result of each worker, and the smooth implementation of emergency preparation work of the nuclear power plant can be effectively ensured.
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of an apparatus for checking emergency action determination level according to an embodiment of the disclosure.
As shown in fig. 3, the apparatus 30 for checking the emergency action determination level includes:
The obtaining module 301 is configured to obtain a reference emergency action level and an initial emergency action level, where the initial emergency action level has a corresponding staff identifier, the initial emergency action level is obtained by a staff identified by the staff identifier according to initial operation data of the nuclear power plant, and the reference emergency action level is obtained by a pre-trained emergency action level judgment model according to the initial operation data;
A comparison module 302, configured to compare the reference emergency action level with the initial emergency action level, so as to obtain a comparison result;
and the generating module 303 is configured to generate a target assessment result corresponding to each staff member according to the multiple comparison results corresponding to each staff member.
In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the comparison module 302 is further configured to:
if the reference emergency action level is the same as the initial emergency action level, determining that the comparison result is passing the comparison;
If the reference emergency activity level and the initial emergency activity level are not the same, it is determined that the alignment results in no pass.
In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the generating module 303 is further configured to:
determining a first number of comparison results of each worker in a preset time period;
Determining that the corresponding comparison result of each worker in the preset time period is a second quantity which is not passed by the comparison;
and determining target assessment results of the corresponding staff according to the first quantity and the second quantity.
In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the generating module 303 is further configured to:
Determining a ratio value between the second number and the first number;
if the proportion value is larger than or equal to the proportion threshold value, determining that the target assessment result of the corresponding staff is that the assessment is not passed;
If the proportion value is smaller than the proportion threshold value, determining that the target assessment result of the corresponding staff is assessment passing.
In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the assessment device 30 for emergency action judgment level further includes:
The display module is used for displaying the target assessment result of each worker after generating the assessment result of each worker according to the corresponding comparison results of each worker.
In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the obtaining module 301 is further configured to:
Acquiring initial operation data of a nuclear power plant;
the initial operation data is input into the pre-trained emergency action level judgment model to obtain a reference emergency action level output by the pre-trained emergency action level judgment model.
Corresponding to the method for checking the emergency action determination level provided in the embodiments of fig. 1 to 2, the present disclosure further provides a device for checking the emergency action determination level, and since the device for checking the emergency action determination level provided in the embodiments of the present disclosure corresponds to the method for checking the emergency action determination level provided in the embodiments of fig. 1 to 2, the implementation of the method for checking the emergency action determination level is also applicable to the device for checking the emergency action determination level provided in the embodiments of the present disclosure, which is not described in detail in the embodiments of the present disclosure.
In the embodiment, the reference emergency action level and the initial emergency action level are obtained, wherein the initial emergency action level is provided with corresponding staff marks, staff marked by the staff marks are judged according to initial operation data of the nuclear power plant, the reference emergency action level is obtained through the judgment of the initial operation data according to the pre-trained emergency action level judgment model, the reference emergency action level and the initial emergency action level are compared to obtain comparison results, and then the target assessment result of each staff is generated according to a plurality of corresponding comparison results of each staff, and the target assessment result of each staff is generated due to the fact that the reference emergency action level is output by the pre-trained emergency action level judgment model.
In order to achieve the above embodiments, the present disclosure further proposes an electronic device including: the system comprises a memory, a processor and a computer program stored in the memory and capable of running on the processor, wherein the processor realizes the assessment method of the emergency action judgment level as proposed by the previous embodiment of the disclosure when executing the program.
In order to implement the above-described embodiments, the present disclosure also proposes a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon a computer program which, when executed by a processor, implements an assessment method of an emergency action judgment level as proposed in the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure.
To achieve the above embodiments, the present disclosure also proposes a computer program product which, when executed by an instruction processor in the computer program product, performs an assessment method of emergency action judgment level as proposed in the foregoing embodiments of the present disclosure.
Fig. 4 illustrates a block diagram of an exemplary electronic device suitable for use in implementing embodiments of the present disclosure. The electronic device 12 shown in fig. 4 is merely an example and should not be construed to limit the functionality and scope of use of embodiments of the present disclosure in any way.
As shown in fig. 4, the electronic device 12 is in the form of a general purpose computing device. Components of the electronic device 12 may include, but are not limited to: one or more processors or processing units 16, a system memory 28, a bus 18 that connects the various system components, including the system memory 28 and the processing units 16.
Bus 18 represents one or more of several types of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, an accelerated graphics port, a processor, and a local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures. By way of example, and not limitation, such architectures include industry Standard architecture (Industry Standard Architecture; hereinafter ISA) bus, micro channel architecture (Micro Channel Architecture; hereinafter MAC) bus, enhanced ISA bus, video electronics standards Association (Video Electronics Standards Association; hereinafter VESA) local bus, and peripheral component interconnect (PERIPHERAL COMPONENT INTERCONNECTION; hereinafter PCI) bus.
Electronic device 12 typically includes a variety of computer system readable media. Such media can be any available media that is accessible by electronic device 12 and includes both volatile and nonvolatile media, removable and non-removable media.
Memory 28 may include computer system readable media in the form of volatile memory, such as random access memory (Random Access Memory; hereinafter: RAM) 30 and/or cache memory 32. The electronic device 12 may further include other removable/non-removable, volatile/nonvolatile computer system storage media. By way of example only, storage system 34 may be used to read from or write to non-removable, nonvolatile magnetic media (not shown in FIG. 4, commonly referred to as a "hard disk drive").
Although not shown in fig. 4, a disk drive for reading from and writing to a removable non-volatile magnetic disk (e.g., a "floppy disk"), and an optical disk drive for reading from or writing to a removable non-volatile optical disk (e.g., a compact disk read only memory (Compact Disc Read Only Memory; hereinafter CD-ROM), digital versatile disk read only memory (Digital Video Disc Read Only Memory; hereinafter DVD-ROM), or other optical media) may be provided. In such cases, each drive may be coupled to bus 18 through one or more data medium interfaces. Memory 28 may include at least one program product having a set (e.g., at least one) of program modules configured to carry out the functions of the various embodiments of the disclosure.
A program/utility 40 having a set (at least one) of program modules 42 may be stored in, for example, memory 28, such program modules 42 including, but not limited to, an operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, and program data, each or some combination of which may include an implementation of a network environment. Program modules 42 generally perform the functions and/or methods in the embodiments described in this disclosure.
The electronic device 12 may also communicate with one or more external devices 14 (e.g., keyboard, pointing device, display 24, etc.), one or more devices that enable a user to interact with the electronic device 12, and/or any devices (e.g., network card, modem, etc.) that enable the electronic device 12 to communicate with one or more other computing devices. Such communication may occur through an input/output (I/O) interface 22. Also, the electronic device 12 may communicate with one or more networks, such as a local area network (Local Area Network; hereinafter: LAN), a wide area network (Wide Area Network; hereinafter: WAN), and/or a public network, such as the Internet, through the network adapter 20. As shown, the network adapter 20 communicates with other modules of the electronic device 12 over the bus 18. It should be appreciated that although not shown, other hardware and/or software modules may be used in connection with electronic device 12, including, but not limited to: microcode, device drivers, redundant processing units, external disk drive arrays, RAID systems, tape drives, data backup storage systems, and the like.
The processing unit 16 executes various functional applications and data processing by running programs stored in the system memory 28, for example, an assessment method of the emergency action judgment level mentioned in the foregoing embodiment.
Other embodiments of the disclosure will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the disclosure disclosed herein. This disclosure is intended to cover any adaptations, uses, or adaptations of the disclosure following the general principles of the disclosure and including such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice within the art to which the disclosure pertains. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the disclosure being indicated by the following claims.
It is to be understood that the present disclosure is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown in the drawings, and that various modifications and changes may be effected without departing from the scope thereof. The scope of the present disclosure is limited only by the appended claims.
It should be noted that in the description of the present disclosure, the terms "first," "second," and the like are used for descriptive purposes only and are not to be construed as indicating or implying relative importance. Furthermore, in the description of the present disclosure, unless otherwise indicated, the meaning of "a plurality" is two or more.
Any process or method descriptions in flow charts or otherwise described herein may be understood as representing modules, segments, or portions of code which include one or more executable instructions for implementing specific logical functions or steps of the process, and further implementations are included within the scope of the preferred embodiment of the present disclosure in which functions may be executed out of order from that shown or discussed, including substantially concurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionality involved, as would be understood by those reasonably skilled in the art of the embodiments of the present disclosure.
It should be understood that portions of the present disclosure may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, or a combination thereof. In the above-described embodiments, the various steps or methods may be implemented in software or firmware stored in a memory and executed by a suitable instruction execution system. For example, if implemented in hardware, as in another embodiment, may be implemented using any one or combination of the following techniques, as is well known in the art: discrete logic circuits having logic gates for implementing logic functions on data signals, application specific integrated circuits having suitable combinational logic gates, programmable Gate Arrays (PGAs), field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), and the like.
Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that all or part of the steps carried out in the method of the above-described embodiments may be implemented by a program to instruct related hardware, and the program may be stored in a computer readable storage medium, where the program when executed includes one or a combination of the steps of the method embodiments.
Furthermore, each functional unit in the embodiments of the present disclosure may be integrated in one processing module, or each unit may exist alone physically, or two or more units may be integrated in one module. The integrated modules may be implemented in hardware or in software functional modules. The integrated modules may also be stored in a computer readable storage medium if implemented as software functional modules and sold or used as a stand-alone product.
The above-mentioned storage medium may be a read-only memory, a magnetic disk or an optical disk, or the like.
In the description of the present specification, a description referring to terms "one embodiment," "some embodiments," "examples," "specific examples," or "some examples," etc., means that a particular feature, structure, material, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment or example is included in at least one embodiment or example of the present disclosure. In this specification, schematic representations of the above terms do not necessarily refer to the same embodiments or examples. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, materials, or characteristics described may be combined in any suitable manner in any one or more embodiments or examples.
Although embodiments of the present disclosure have been shown and described above, it will be understood that the above embodiments are illustrative and not to be construed as limiting the present disclosure, and that variations, modifications, alternatives, and variations may be made to the above embodiments by one of ordinary skill in the art within the scope of the present disclosure.
Claims (10)
1. An assessment method for emergency action judgment level is characterized by comprising the following steps:
Obtaining a reference emergency action level and an initial emergency action level, wherein the initial emergency action level is provided with a corresponding staff mark, the initial emergency action level is obtained by judging staff marked by the staff mark according to initial operation data of a nuclear power plant, and the reference emergency action level is obtained by judging a pre-trained emergency action level judging model according to the initial operation data;
comparing the reference emergency action level with the initial emergency action level to obtain a comparison result;
and generating a target assessment result of each corresponding worker according to a plurality of comparison results of each worker.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein said comparing said reference emergency activity level to said initial emergency activity level to obtain a comparison result comprises:
If the reference emergency action level is the same as the initial emergency action level, determining that the comparison result is passing by comparison;
And if the reference emergency action level is different from the initial emergency action level, determining that the comparison result is that the comparison is not passed.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein generating a target assessment result for each respective worker based on the respective plurality of comparison results for each worker comprises:
Determining a first number of the comparison results of each worker in a preset time period;
determining that the corresponding comparison result of each worker in the preset time period is a second number which is not passed by comparison;
And determining the target assessment results of the corresponding staff members according to the first quantity and the second quantity.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein said determining said target assessment results for respective ones of said staff members based on said first number and said second number comprises:
Determining a ratio value between the second quantity and the first quantity;
if the ratio value is greater than or equal to a ratio threshold value, determining that the target assessment result of the corresponding staff is that the assessment is not passed;
And if the proportion value is smaller than the proportion threshold value, determining that the target assessment result of the corresponding staff member is passed by assessment.
5. The method of claim 4, further comprising, after generating the assessment result for each respective worker based on the respective plurality of comparison results for each worker:
and displaying the target assessment result of each staff.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the obtaining a reference emergency action level comprises:
acquiring the initial operation data of the nuclear power plant;
And inputting the initial operation data into the pre-trained emergency action level judgment model to acquire the reference emergency action level output by the pre-trained emergency action level judgment model.
7. An assessment device for emergency action judgment level, comprising:
The system comprises an acquisition module, a pre-training emergency action level judgment module and a pre-training emergency action level judgment module, wherein the acquisition module is used for acquiring a reference emergency action level and an initial emergency action level, the initial emergency action level is provided with a corresponding staff mark, the initial emergency action level is obtained by judging staff marked by the staff mark according to initial operation data of a nuclear power plant, and the reference emergency action level is obtained by judging a pre-training emergency action level judgment model according to the initial operation data;
the comparison module is used for comparing the reference emergency action level with the initial emergency action level to obtain a comparison result;
the generating module is used for generating a target assessment result of each corresponding worker according to a plurality of comparison results corresponding to each worker.
8. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the alignment module is further to:
If the reference emergency action level is the same as the initial emergency action level, determining that the comparison result is passing by comparison;
And if the reference emergency action level is the same as the initial emergency action level, determining that the comparison result is not passing.
9. An electronic device, comprising:
At least one processor; and
A memory communicatively coupled to the at least one processor; wherein,
The memory stores instructions executable by the at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to perform the method of any one of claims 1-6.
10. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing computer instructions for causing the computer to perform the method of any one of claims 1-6.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202211296919.0A CN117973663A (en) | 2022-10-21 | 2022-10-21 | Assessment method and device for emergency action judgment level, electronic equipment and medium |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202211296919.0A CN117973663A (en) | 2022-10-21 | 2022-10-21 | Assessment method and device for emergency action judgment level, electronic equipment and medium |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN117973663A true CN117973663A (en) | 2024-05-03 |
Family
ID=90863786
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202211296919.0A Pending CN117973663A (en) | 2022-10-21 | 2022-10-21 | Assessment method and device for emergency action judgment level, electronic equipment and medium |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN117973663A (en) |
-
2022
- 2022-10-21 CN CN202211296919.0A patent/CN117973663A/en active Pending
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN108073519B (en) | Test case generation method and device | |
| US20080276129A1 (en) | Software tracing | |
| CN117973663A (en) | Assessment method and device for emergency action judgment level, electronic equipment and medium | |
| CN110888809B (en) | Risk prediction method and device for test task | |
| US10372849B2 (en) | Performing and communicating sheet metal simulations employing a combination of factors | |
| US20110130989A1 (en) | System and method for identifying a peripheral component interconnect express signal | |
| CN113742083B (en) | Scheduling simulation method, scheduling simulation device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN115269389A (en) | Project quality determination method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN113902457B (en) | Method and device for evaluating reliability of house source information, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN116124368A (en) | Water leakage detection method for cooling water pipe joint of electromagnetic bearing control cabinet of main helium fan | |
| CN116860565A (en) | Abnormality display detection method, abnormality display detection device, electronic device and storage medium | |
| CN112582054A (en) | Medical insurance data supervision method and device, electronic equipment and medium | |
| CN116911450B (en) | Deterioration trend early warning method and device for hydropower station auxiliary equipment and electronic equipment | |
| CN112988567A (en) | Crowdsourcing test automated evaluation method and device | |
| CN116820946B (en) | Method and device for automatically testing compatibility of target software | |
| CN111176931A (en) | Operation monitoring method, operation monitoring device, server and storage medium | |
| CN112161742B (en) | Power sensor detection method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN116303102B (en) | Test data generation method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN114914008A (en) | Control method and device for emergency response action of nuclear power plant, electronic equipment and medium | |
| CN116302900B (en) | Computing power reliability assessment method of multi-access edge computing system | |
| WO2018226659A1 (en) | Systems and methods for verification value of user entered values resulting from point of care testing using a meter | |
| CN116225875A (en) | Data processing method, medium, device and computing equipment | |
| CN113313423A (en) | Efficiency data processing method and device and electronic equipment | |
| CN117974094A (en) | Abnormal root cause positioning method and device for nuclear power plant, electronic equipment and medium | |
| CN118200196A (en) | Method, device, equipment and medium for detecting abnormal reset of battery management system |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |