CN117726206A - Urban safety culture construction assessment method and system - Google Patents
Urban safety culture construction assessment method and system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN117726206A CN117726206A CN202311567868.5A CN202311567868A CN117726206A CN 117726206 A CN117726206 A CN 117726206A CN 202311567868 A CN202311567868 A CN 202311567868A CN 117726206 A CN117726206 A CN 117726206A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- score
- evaluation
- culture construction
- principal component
- evaluation index
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 93
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 44
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 163
- 238000000513 principal component analysis Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 claims description 31
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 24
- 239000004035 construction material Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000009440 infrastructure construction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 description 2
- 101100433753 Arabidopsis thaliana ABCG2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037213 diet Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000005911 diet Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000005284 excitation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001902 propagating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007670 refining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A30/00—Adapting or protecting infrastructure or their operation
- Y02A30/60—Planning or developing urban green infrastructure
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides an urban security culture construction assessment method and system, wherein the method comprises the following steps: collecting and electronically storing safety culture construction data; step 2: according to the collected safety culture construction data, scoring is carried out by comparing the evaluation indexes of the evaluation system; step 3: and carrying out principal component analysis according to the scoring result to obtain a principal component analysis result. The method has the advantages that key information is extracted from the safety culture construction data, and the first score is determined according to the extracted key information, so that the defect of insufficient objectivity caused by only relying on expert scores is overcome; the data dimension can be reduced through principal component analysis, and the principal component comprehensive score is obtained; the weighted comprehensive score can be obtained through weighted calculation, and the data information is embodied in full dimension; suggestions and a plurality of city sequences can be automatically given, so that further improvement of city safety culture construction is facilitated; the key information extraction of the safety file construction data is automatically extracted, and the workload is saved.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of safety assessment, in particular to an urban safety culture construction assessment method and system.
Background
The security is the first thing, the social security is important for both individuals and countries, and the evaluation of the security culture construction result of a city is mostly dependent on artificial subjective judgment, no specific data support exists, and an objective calculation method is lacked, so that the obtained evaluation result is poor in objectivity.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to solve at least one of the technical problems, the invention provides a city safety culture construction assessment method and system, which can objectively assess the safety culture construction result of a city.
The first aspect of the invention provides an urban security culture construction assessment method, which comprises the following steps:
step 1: collecting and electronically storing safety culture construction data;
step 2: according to the collected safety culture construction data, scoring is carried out by comparing the evaluation indexes of the evaluation system;
step 3: and carrying out principal component analysis according to the scoring result to obtain a principal component analysis result.
Preferably, in step 1, the security culture construction data includes text data and audio/video data.
In step 2, preferably, the key information of the security culture construction data stored electronically is extracted according to the sub-index of each evaluation index, and the first score of the evaluation index is obtained according to the wedging degree of the extracted key information and the sub-index.
In the step 2, the keywords of the text data and the audio data are extracted according to the sub-index of each evaluation index; and extracting key scenes of the video data.
In the above scheme, preferably, in step 2, a keyword/key scene meeting the requirement of the sub-index is extracted, and a corresponding score is increased; conversely, the corresponding score is reduced; and summarizing to obtain a first score of the evaluation index.
In step 2, the received safety culture construction data is preferably pushed to a plurality of experts, and the experts score each evaluation index according to the safety culture construction data to obtain a second score of the evaluation index.
In any of the above embodiments, it is preferable that in step 2, the first score of the evaluation index is directly used as the final score of the evaluation index.
In any of the above embodiments, preferably, in step 2, the first score and the second score of the evaluation index are weighted and summed to be a final score of the evaluation index.
In any of the above embodiments, it is preferable that in step 3, principal component analysis is performed on the final scores of all the evaluation indexes, and a principal component composite score is calculated.
Preferably, in any of the above aspects, the method further comprises step 4: and (3) calculating a weighted comprehensive score according to the scores in the step (2) and the weights of all the evaluation indexes.
In any of the above-described aspects, preferably, in step 4, the weight of each evaluation index with respect to the previous level index is calculated by constructing the judgment matrix, and the weight of each evaluation index with respect to the total target is finally determined.
In any of the above embodiments, it is preferable that in step 4, the weight of each of the predetermined evaluation indexes is directly used.
Either of the above-described schemes preferably makes the advice based on the principal component composite score and/or the weighted composite score.
The second aspect of the invention provides an urban safety culture construction assessment system, which is used for executing the urban safety culture construction assessment method and adopts the following technical scheme.
An urban security culture construction assessment system comprising:
and an input module: the method is used for electronizing the collected non-electronized safe culture construction data;
and a storage module: safety cultural construction data and evaluation system for storing electronization
The key information extraction module: the storage module is used for storing the key information in the electronic safe culture construction data according to the sub-index of each evaluation index of the evaluation system;
a first scoring module: the first score is used for obtaining an evaluation index according to the wedging degree of the extracted key information and the sub-index;
and a second scoring module: the method comprises the steps of pushing safety cultural construction data to an expert, obtaining scores of the expert, and obtaining second scores of evaluation indexes;
and a principal component analysis module: and the method is used for determining a final score according to the first score or the first score and the second score, and performing principal component analysis on the final score to obtain a principal component analysis result comprising a principal component comprehensive score.
Preferably, the system further comprises a weighted composite score calculation module: and the weight of each evaluation index is determined, and a weighted comprehensive score is calculated according to the final score of each evaluation index.
Preferably, in any of the above aspects, the system further comprises an evaluation module for making a recommendation based on the principal component composite score and/or the weighted composite score.
Preferably, in any of the above aspects, the evaluation module is further configured to rank the principal component composite scores and/or weighted composite scores of the multiple cities.
The urban safety culture construction assessment method and system have the following beneficial effects:
(1) The key information can be extracted from the safety culture construction data, the first score is determined according to the extracted key information, and the final score is finally determined according to the first score or simultaneously according to the first score and the second score, so that the defect of insufficient objectivity caused by only relying on expert scores is overcome;
(2) The data dimension can be reduced through principal component analysis, and the principal component comprehensive score is obtained;
(3) The weighted comprehensive score can be obtained through weighted calculation, and the data information is embodied in full dimension;
(4) Suggestions and a plurality of city sequences can be automatically given, so that further improvement of city safety culture construction is facilitated;
(5) And the key information of the safety file construction materials is automatically extracted, so that the workload is saved.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a flow chart of a preferred embodiment of the city security culture construction assessment method according to the present invention.
Fig. 2 is a schematic structural view of a preferred embodiment of the city safety culture construction assessment system according to the present invention.
Fig. 3 is a schematic flow chart of principal component analysis according to another embodiment of the city security culture construction assessment method of the present invention.
Fig. 4 is a schematic diagram of evaluation indexes and weights thereof in still another embodiment of the city safety culture construction evaluation method according to the present invention.
Detailed Description
The invention will be described in more detail with reference to specific examples.
Example 1
As shown in fig. 1, a city security culture construction evaluation method includes:
step 1: collecting and electronically storing safety culture construction data;
step 2: according to the collected safety culture construction data, scoring is carried out by comparing the evaluation indexes of the evaluation system;
step 3: and carrying out principal component analysis according to the scoring result to obtain a principal component analysis result.
In this embodiment, preferably, the city security culture construction assessment method further includes:
step 4: calculating a weighted comprehensive score according to the scores in the step 2 and the weights of all the evaluation indexes;
step 5: and giving suggestions according to the principal component composite score and/or the weighted composite score.
In this embodiment, preferably, in step 1, the secure culture construction data includes text data and audio/video data.
In step 2, preferably, key information of the security culture construction data stored electronically is extracted according to sub-indicators of each evaluation indicator, and a first score of the evaluation indicator is obtained according to a degree of wedging between the extracted key information and the sub-indicators. Specifically, extracting keywords of the text data and the audio data according to the sub-index of each evaluation index; extracting key scenes of video data; extracting keywords/key scenes meeting the sub-index requirements, and increasing corresponding scores; conversely, the corresponding score is reduced; and summarizing to obtain a first score of the evaluation index.
In the embodiment, it is further preferable that in step 2, the received safety culture construction data is pushed to a plurality of experts, and the experts score each evaluation index according to the safety culture construction data to obtain a second score of the evaluation index. In step 2, the first score of the evaluation index may be directly used as the final score of the evaluation index; alternatively, the first score and the second score of the evaluation index are weighted and summed to be the final score of the evaluation index.
In this embodiment, it is preferable that in step 3, principal component analysis is performed for the final scores of all the evaluation indexes, and a principal component composite score is calculated.
In step 4, the weight of each evaluation index relative to the previous level index is calculated by constructing a judgment matrix, or the weight of each preset evaluation index is directly adopted, and the weight of each evaluation index relative to the total target is finally determined.
Step 5 further comprises: the principal component composite scores and/or weighted composite scores for a plurality of cities are ranked.
Example 2
As shown in fig. 2, an urban security culture construction evaluation system is configured to execute the urban security culture construction evaluation method, and includes:
the input module 100: the method is used for electronizing the collected non-electronized safe culture construction data;
the storage module 200: safety cultural construction data and evaluation system for storing electronization
Key information extraction module 300: the storage module is used for storing the key information in the electronic safe culture construction data according to the sub-index of each evaluation index of the evaluation system;
the first scoring module 400: the first score is used for obtaining an evaluation index according to the wedging degree of the extracted key information and the sub-index;
the second scoring module 500: the method comprises the steps of pushing safety cultural construction data to an expert, obtaining scores of the expert, and obtaining second scores of evaluation indexes;
principal component analysis module 600: and the method is used for determining a final score according to the first score or the first score and the second score, and performing principal component analysis on the final score to obtain a principal component analysis result comprising a principal component comprehensive score.
In this embodiment, preferably, the system further includes:
weighted composite score calculation module 700: the method comprises the steps of determining the weight of each evaluation index, and calculating a weighted comprehensive score according to the final score of each evaluation index;
the evaluation module 800 is configured to make a suggestion according to the principal component composite score and/or the weighted composite score.
It is further preferred in this embodiment that the evaluation module is further configured to rank the principal component composite scores and/or the weighted composite scores of the multiple cities.
Example 3
In this embodiment, taking city safety culture construction evaluation of A, B, C, D, E, F, G seven cities as an example, the city safety culture construction evaluation method and system are described in more detail.
Aiming at the seven cities, an evaluation system for city safety culture construction evaluation comprises a target layer, a criterion layer, an index layer and a sub-index layer.
The target layer is the overall target of city safety culture construction to reach harmony between people and safety culture.
The criteria layer is to differentiate the target layer into three small layers to quantify the target layer among the three small layers. Specifically, the criteria layer includes: urban safety culture resource management, urban safety culture construction resource optimization configuration and urban safety culture resource infrastructure construction.
The index layer is composed of directly measurable evaluation indexes, each criterion layer is refined, and each evaluation index in the index layer is not only simple to use, but also has the characteristics of high operability and representativeness. Specifically, the index layer includes evaluation indexes as shown in table 1.
TABLE 1 index layer evaluation index
| Code | Evaluation index | Code | Evaluation index |
| P1 | Scheme planning | P19 | Safety standard standardization system construction |
| P2 | Propaganda mechanism construction | P20 | Citizen safety behavior specification |
| P3 | Safety propaganda | P21 | Pendant Fan Yinling |
| P4 | Propaganda article making and using | P22 | Responsibility for performing the function |
| P5 | Propaganda battle array construction | P23 | Autonomous learning |
| P6 | Law making education | P24 | Forward excitation |
| P7 | Education in universities and colleges | P25 | Safety innovation |
| P8 | Education of special item | P26 | Building a safe environment |
| P9 | Five-in activity | P27 | Safety production group prevention and treatment |
| P10 | Safety cares and actions | P28 | Safety monitoring and early warning |
| P11 | Enterprise basic training | P29 | Strengthen emergency force |
| P12 | Secure cultural sharing | P30 | Safety work performance |
| P13 | Online safe lecture hall | P31 | Brand construction |
| P14 | Safe cultural activity | P32 | Safety management tool box |
| P15 | Social investigation | P33 | Propaganda carrier construction |
| P16 | Collection of urban safety concepts | P34 | Safe cultural construction expert database |
| P17 | Propagating urban security concepts | P35 | Network investigation |
| P18 | Safety regulation system construction | P36 | Random investigation |
The sub-index layer is used for further refining and dividing each evaluation index, and further extracting key information aiming at each sub-index.
It should be understood that the evaluation system should be built according to the pertinence, feasibility and systematicness principles of the index, and the determined criterion layer and index layer should reflect the characteristics of the security culture construction. And according to different evaluation key points each time, the rule layer, the index layer and the sub-index layer can be adaptively aligned for adjustment.
After an evaluation system for urban safety culture construction evaluation is established, the urban safety culture construction evaluation method is started to be executed by means of the urban safety culture construction evaluation system.
Step 1 is executed: collecting and electronically storing the safe cultural construction data. When collecting the security cultural construction data, the related text data and audio/video data should be collected according to the established evaluation system, especially each evaluation index included in the index layer. For the collected non-electronic data, the electronic data is performed by the logging module 100, and the electronic data is stored in the storage module 200. The storage module 200 also stores an established evaluation system.
And (2) executing the step (2): and (5) according to the collected safety culture construction data, grading by comparing the evaluation indexes of the evaluation system. In this embodiment, for each evaluation index, there are two scoring modes, which respectively obtain a first score and a second score corresponding to the evaluation index, and finally, the first score and the second score are weighted and summed to obtain a final score of the evaluation index.
Specifically, the first score acquisition method includes: the key information extraction module 300 extracts key information from the electronically stored security culture construction materials according to the sub-index of each evaluation index of the evaluation system, and stores the extracted key information to the storage module 200; the first scoring module 400 then obtains a first score for each of the evaluation indicators according to the degree of engagement of the extracted key information with the sub-indicators. More specifically, the key information extraction module 300 extracts the key words of the text data and the audio data according to the sub-index of each evaluation index; extracting key scenes of video data; the first scoring module 400 judges that the keywords/key scenes meeting the sub-index requirements are extracted, and increases the corresponding scores; conversely, the corresponding score is reduced; and summarizing to obtain a first score of the evaluation index.
The second score acquisition method comprises the following steps: the second scoring module 500 pushes the received safety culture construction data to a plurality of experts, and the experts score each evaluation index according to the safety culture construction data to obtain a second score of the evaluation index. In this embodiment, it is preferable that each evaluation index of the index layer is scored by at least five experts, each expert has a professional technical work experience related to security management for more than five years, and at least two experts are occupatively qualified by registered security engineers. After each expert scores the index layer, the scores of each expert are averaged to obtain a second score. It should be noted that, the second score may be determined by weighting and summing the scores of the experts, averaging after removing the lowest score and the highest score, averaging, and the like, which is not particularly limited in this application.
After determining the first score and the second score for each of the evaluation indicators, the principal component analysis module 600 determines a final score for each of the evaluation indicators for the indicator layer based on the first score and the second score. Specifically, the principal component analysis module 600 performs weighted summation on the first score and the second score to determine a final score of each evaluation index of the index layer.
Executing the step 3: the principal component analysis module 600 performs principal component analysis according to the final scoring result of each evaluation index, to obtain a principal component analysis result including a principal component composite score.
And 4, executing the step: the weighted composite score calculation module 700 calculates a weighted composite score based on the final score of each evaluation index and the weight of each evaluation index in step 2. The weighted composite score calculation module 700 can calculate the weight of each evaluation index with respect to the upper level index (criterion layer) by constructing a judgment matrix, and finally determine the weight of each evaluation index with respect to the total target. The weighted composite score calculating module 700 is further provided with weights of all preset evaluation indexes.
And (5) executing the following steps: the evaluation module 800 suggests and ranks the principal component composite scores and/or weighted composite scores for multiple cities.
Example 4
The present embodiment is similar to the foregoing embodiment, except that in the present embodiment, the determination process of the first score thereof is described taking the "plan for proposal" evaluation index of code P1 and the "citizen safety behavior specification" of code P20 as examples.
Scheme planning for evaluation index P1: the evaluation index is provided with a plurality of sub-indexes, which are respectively: guiding ideas, basic principles, work objectives, organizational leaders/institutions, work measures, etc. The key information extraction module 300 extracts key information from the electronically stored security culture construction materials for the sub-indexes, and stores the extracted key information to the storage module 200. The first scoring module 400 obtains a first score of each evaluation index according to the wedging degree of the extracted key information and the sub-index. If the key information meeting the sub-index requirement is extracted every time, the key information is increased by 0.5 point.
For evaluation index P20 citizen safety behavior specification: the evaluation index is provided with a plurality of sub-indexes, which are respectively: traffic safety, home safety, diet safety, operation safety, etc. The key information extraction module 300 extracts key information from the electronically stored security culture construction materials for the sub-indexes, and stores the extracted key information to the storage module 200. The first scoring module 400 obtains a first score of each evaluation index according to the wedging degree of the extracted key information and the sub-index. If a key information which does not meet the sub-index requirements (such as a key scene which does not meet the traffic safety, such as crossing roads, violating traffic lights, and the like) is extracted, the key information is reduced by 0.5 point.
It should be noted that, for some evaluation indexes, if the data volume of the related safety culture construction data is huge, the related safety culture construction data can be processed in a sampling mode, for example, the traffic safety aiming at the citizen safety behavior specification can be sampled for some time periods of some traffic intersections, so as to obtain the related safety culture construction data.
Example 5
This embodiment is similar to the previous embodiment, except that the principal component analysis process in step 3 is described in detail.
The main component analysis of the final scores of all the evaluation indexes is mainly aimed at performing dimension reduction operation on the basis of reducing information loss so as to realize comprehensive analysis of data.
As shown in fig. 3, the specific method of principal component analysis includes:
step 31: dividing the final score of the evaluation index into n groups, each group containing m data, and writing the m data as a matrixWherein->
Step 32: the matrix X is normalized to obtain a normalized matrix Z. For any one element in matrix ZWherein i=1, 2,3, …, n; j=1, 2,3, …, m; />
Step 33: covariance matrix of normalized matrix Z is calculated
Step 34: and calculating eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors of the covariance matrix C. Specifically, according to the formula |lambda i Calculating eigenvalue lambda of covariance matrix C by E-C|=0 i Where i=1, 2,3, …, m, and λ 1 >λ 2 >…>λ m Corresponding feature vector U i ＝[u i1 u i2 … u im ] T ,i＝1,2,3,…,m。
Step 35: calculating principal component F i ＝u 1i X 1 +u 2i X 2 +…+u mi X m ,i＝1,2,3,…,m。
Step 36: and calculating the contribution rate of the main component. Specifying the ith masterThe contribution rate of the components is K i The cumulative contribution rate of the first i principal components is P i Then
Step 37: select P i >The first i principal components of 85% are calculated, and the principal component composite score is calculated.
Example 6
This embodiment is similar to the foregoing embodiment, except that in this embodiment, the weight of each evaluation index is determined when the weighted composite score is calculated in step 4, taking the evaluation system constructed in embodiment 3 as an example. The weight determining method of each evaluation index comprises the following steps:
step 41: constructing a pairwise comparison judgment matrix A of each criterion of the criterion layer relative to the target layer;
step 42: aiming at each criterion of the criterion layer, constructing pairwise comparison judgment matrixes BA, BB and BC of each subordinate evaluation index relative to the criterion;
step 43: respectively carrying out consistency check on the judgment matrixes A, BA, BB and BC;
step 44: calculating the maximum eigenvalue of the judgment matrix A and the eigenvector corresponding to the maximum eigenvalue to obtain the weight of each criterion of the criterion layer relative to the target layer; calculating the maximum eigenvalues of BA, BB and BC and eigenvectors corresponding to the maximum eigenvalues respectively, and obtaining the weight of each evaluation index relative to the accurate measurement to which the evaluation index belongs according to the eigenvectors corresponding to the maximum eigenvalues;
step 45: and multiplying the weight of each evaluation index relative to the standard to which the evaluation index belongs by the weight of the criterion relative to the target layer to obtain the weight of each evaluation index relative to the target layer.
In step 41 and step 42, the importance of each criterion/evaluation index is ranked according to the nine-bit ratio when constructing the judgment matrix, so as to construct the judgment matrix, wherein each judgment matrix is respectively recorded as:
in step 43, when consistency verification is performed on each judgment matrix, the method includes:
step 431: calculating a consistency indexWherein lambda is max In order to judge the maximum eigenvalue of the matrix, N is the order of the matrix, the value is 3 or N or M or T, N represents the number of the evaluation indexes of the first criterion of 'urban safety culture resource management' belonging to the criterion layer, M represents the number of the evaluation indexes of the second criterion of 'urban safety culture construction resource optimization configuration' belonging to the criterion layer, T represents the number of the evaluation indexes of the third criterion of 'urban safety culture resource infrastructure construction' belonging to the criterion layer, and 3 is the same as the criterion number of the criterion layer.
Step 432: the table lookup determines the corresponding average random consistency index RI;
step 433: calculating a random consistency ratio CR=CI/RI and judging, wherein if CR is less than 0.1, the judgment matrix passes consistency test; if CR is more than 0.1, the judgment matrix does not meet the consistency requirement, and the judgment matrix needs to be revised again until the judgment matrix passes the consistency check.
In step 44, for the judgment matrix passing the consistency check, the maximum eigenvalue and the eigenvector corresponding to the maximum eigenvalue are calculated respectively, and the weight of each evaluation index relative to the quasi-measurement to which the evaluation index belongs is obtained according to the eigenvector corresponding to the maximum eigenvalue. The feature vectors corresponding to the maximum feature values of the judgment matrices A, BA, BB and BC are WA= (WA 1, WA2, WA 3) respectively T ，WBA＝(wba1,wba2,…,wbaN) T ，WBB＝(wbb1,wbb2,…,wbbM) T ，WBC＝(wbc1,wbc2,…,wbcT) T 。WA＝(wa1,wa2,wa3) T Wherein wa1, wa2 and wa3 respectively represent three criterion relative of the criterion layerWeights at target layer, wba= (WBA, WBA, 2, …, wbaN) T Wba1, wba, … and wbaN in (b 1, WBB2, …, wbbM) respectively represent weights of the N evaluation indexes under the first criterion relative to the first criterion, respectively T Wherein wbb1, wbb2, … and wbbM represent weights of the M evaluation indexes under the second criterion relative to the second criterion, respectively, wbc= (WBC 1, WBC2, …, wbcT) T Wbc1, wbc, … and wbcT in (b) respectively represent the weights of the T evaluation indexes under the third criterion relative to the third criterion, respectively.
In step 45, the weight of the first evaluation index relative to the target layer under the first criterion is obtained by multiplying wba1 by wa1, the weight of the first evaluation index relative to the target layer under the second criterion is obtained by multiplying wb 1 by wa2, the weight of the first evaluation index relative to the target layer under the third criterion is obtained by multiplying wbc1 by wa3, and the weights of other evaluation indexes relative to the target layer are obtained by performing the same procedure.
And carrying out weighted summation on the final scores of the evaluation indexes by using the calculated weights of the evaluation indexes, so as to obtain weighted comprehensive scores.
Example 7
The present embodiment is similar to the foregoing embodiment, except that in the present embodiment, the weighted composite score may be calculated directly by using the weights of the evaluation indexes preset in the weighted composite score calculation module 700 with respect to the target layer. Fig. 4 shows a set of weights for each evaluation index set in advance.
Example 8
The embodiment is similar to the foregoing embodiment, except that in the embodiment, the first score of each evaluation index is directly adopted as the final score of each evaluation index, so that the dependence on expert scoring is completely eliminated, the scoring result is more objective, and the degree of automation is improved.
It should be noted that the above embodiments are only for illustrating the technical solution of the present invention, and are not limiting; while the foregoing embodiments are illustrative of the present invention in detail, those skilled in the art will appreciate that: the technical scheme described in the foregoing embodiments may be modified or some or all of the technical features may be replaced with equivalents, which do not depart from the scope of the technical scheme of the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. A city safety culture construction assessment method is characterized in that: comprising the following steps:
step 1: collecting and electronically storing safety culture construction data;
step 2: according to the collected safety culture construction data, scoring is carried out by comparing the evaluation indexes of the evaluation system;
step 3: and carrying out principal component analysis according to the scoring result to obtain a principal component analysis result.
2. The urban security culture construction assessment method according to claim 1, wherein: in step 1, the security culture construction data comprises text data and audio/video data.
3. The urban security culture construction assessment method according to claim 2, wherein: in step 2, key information of the security culture construction data stored in an electronic mode is extracted according to sub-indexes of each evaluation index, and a first score of the evaluation index is obtained according to the wedging degree of the extracted key information and the sub-indexes.
4. A city security culture construction assessment method as claimed in claim 3, wherein: in step 2, the received safety culture construction data is pushed to a plurality of experts, and the experts score each evaluation index according to the safety culture construction data to obtain a second score of the evaluation index.
5. The urban security culture construction assessment method according to claim 4, wherein: in step 2, the first score of the evaluation index is directly used as the final score of the evaluation index, or the first score and the second score of the evaluation index are weighted and summed to be used as the final score of the evaluation index.
6. The urban security culture construction assessment method according to claim 5, wherein: in step 3, principal component analysis is performed on the final scores of all the evaluation indexes, and a principal component comprehensive score is calculated.
7. The urban security culture construction assessment method according to claim 6, wherein: further comprising step 4: and (3) calculating a weighted comprehensive score according to the scores in the step (2) and the weights of all the evaluation indexes.
8. The urban security culture construction assessment method according to claim 7, wherein: the advice is given based on the principal component composite score, and/or the weighted composite score.
9. An urban security culture construction evaluation system is characterized in that: a method for performing the city security culture construction assessment method of any one of claims 1-8, comprising:
and an input module: the method is used for electronizing the collected non-electronized safe culture construction data;
and a storage module: safety cultural construction data and evaluation system for storing electronization
The key information extraction module: the storage module is used for storing the key information in the electronic safe culture construction data according to the sub-index of each evaluation index of the evaluation system;
a first scoring module: the first score is used for obtaining an evaluation index according to the wedging degree of the extracted key information and the sub-index;
and a second scoring module: the method comprises the steps of pushing safety cultural construction data to an expert, obtaining scores of the expert, and obtaining second scores of evaluation indexes;
and a principal component analysis module: and the method is used for determining a final score according to the first score or the first score and the second score, and performing principal component analysis on the final score to obtain a principal component analysis result comprising a principal component comprehensive score.
10. The urban security culture construction assessment system according to claim 9, wherein: and the method also comprises a weighted comprehensive score calculation module: the method comprises the steps of determining the weight of each evaluation index, and calculating a weighted comprehensive score according to the final score of each evaluation index; and the evaluation module is used for giving suggestions according to the principal component comprehensive score and/or the weighted comprehensive score.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202311567868.5A CN117726206A (en) | 2023-11-22 | 2023-11-22 | Urban safety culture construction assessment method and system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202311567868.5A CN117726206A (en) | 2023-11-22 | 2023-11-22 | Urban safety culture construction assessment method and system |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN117726206A true CN117726206A (en) | 2024-03-19 |
Family
ID=90198821
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202311567868.5A Pending CN117726206A (en) | 2023-11-22 | 2023-11-22 | Urban safety culture construction assessment method and system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN117726206A (en) |
-
2023
- 2023-11-22 CN CN202311567868.5A patent/CN117726206A/en active Pending
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN110119904A (en) | A kind of Warships Equipment Maintenance Evaluation in Support Ability method and system | |
| CN104392087B (en) | A kind of overhead weapon station performance estimating method | |
| CN105512465B (en) | Based on the cloud platform safety quantitative estimation method for improving VIKOR methods | |
| CN106951568A (en) | Student's poverty Forecasting Methodology based on data mining | |
| CN107832982A (en) | One kind fits trip's index calculation method based on big data tourism trip assessment models region | |
| CN109165807A (en) | A kind of energy quality comprehensive assessment method based on probabilistic neural network | |
| CN110837945A (en) | Method for evaluating post competence of personnel in hospital functional department | |
| CN109460926A (en) | Platform area group of assets comprehensive performance evaluation method based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Information Entropy | |
| CN116468300A (en) | Army general hospital discipline assessment method and system based on neural network | |
| Yang | Decision tree algorithm based university graduate employment trend prediction | |
| CN112070367A (en) | Large-scale weapon equipment value evaluation method based on improved comprehensive success rate | |
| CN117726206A (en) | Urban safety culture construction assessment method and system | |
| CN111160719A (en) | Two-network fused multi-index evaluation method | |
| CN113837644B (en) | Equipment combat effectiveness and contribution rate integrated evaluation method based on grey correlation | |
| CN115689338A (en) | Multi-index-based power distribution network technology maturity evaluation method and system | |
| CN110866694A (en) | Power grid construction project financial evaluation system and method | |
| Efendi | Application of the Smart Method To Determine the Best Village | |
| CN112464473A (en) | Remote sensing satellite application efficiency evaluation method | |
| CN108596461B (en) | Intelligent system and method for training effect evaluation | |
| Wang et al. | Construction of sports tourism suitability evaluation system based on ahp | |
| Lin | Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Method Based on Dispersion Maximization and its Practical Application | |
| CN116227972A (en) | Scientific and technological attendant work quantitative evaluation method based on cloud platform | |
| CN114648204A (en) | Multi-scene dynamic enterprise comprehensive evaluation method and system | |
| Zhang et al. | The Establishment of Objective Performance Evaluation System for PPP Project Considering the Influence of Factors between Indicators (1) | |
| Wu et al. | Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation in weapon equipment systems |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |