CN116699578A - Soft and hard equipment inter-sound compatibility testing method based on step progressive control - Google Patents
Soft and hard equipment inter-sound compatibility testing method based on step progressive control Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN116699578A CN116699578A CN202310470440.2A CN202310470440A CN116699578A CN 116699578 A CN116699578 A CN 116699578A CN 202310470440 A CN202310470440 A CN 202310470440A CN 116699578 A CN116699578 A CN 116699578A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- equipment
- hard
- distance
- soft
- receiving
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 75
- 230000000750 progressive effect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 7
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 33
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000007123 defense Effects 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013102 re-test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005236 sound signal Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008685 targeting Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S7/00—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
- G01S7/52—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S15/00
- G01S7/537—Counter-measures or counter-counter-measures, e.g. jamming, anti-jamming
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S15/00—Systems using the reflection or reradiation of acoustic waves, e.g. sonar systems
- G01S15/006—Theoretical aspects
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S7/00—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
- G01S7/52—Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S15/00
- G01S7/52001—Auxiliary means for detecting or identifying sonar signals or the like, e.g. sonar jamming signals
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A90/00—Technologies having an indirect contribution to adaptation to climate change
- Y02A90/30—Assessment of water resources
Abstract
The application discloses a soft and hard equipment inter-sound compatibility testing method based on step progressive control, which belongs to the field of underwater defense of water surface ships, and comprises the steps that sounding equipment and receiving equipment are suspended to corresponding underwater depths according to the use states of equipment, so that the minimum safe working distance is used as an initial setting value of the horizontal distance between the sounding equipment and the receiving equipment in a theoretical compatibility mode; under the working condition of the soft equipment sounding equipment according to the specified working mode, an incoming target radiation noise simulator carried by the test ship 2 is utilized to simulate an incoming high-speed medium noise target, the distance between the incoming high-speed medium noise target and the receiving equipment is respectively adjusted in a far-to-near and far-to-far mode at a preset navigational speed, the interference condition of the soft equipment on the hard equipment is judged by detecting the action condition of the receiving equipment of the hard equipment, and therefore the compatible minimum safe working distance of the soft equipment and the hard equipment is determined. The application can test the working influence of the acoustic compatibility among different soft and hard equipment and determine the minimum safe working distance for the acoustic compatibility among different soft and hard equipment.
Description
Technical Field
The application belongs to the technical field of underwater defense of water-surface ships, and particularly relates to a method for testing acoustic compatibility between soft and hard equipment, which is suitable for defining a safe working distance compatible with the soft and hard equipment, supporting the use research of the soft and hard equipment, the analysis and calculation of underwater defense efficiency and the evaluation of success probability of interception of an attack torpedo.
Background
The equipment used for the underwater defense of the surface ship is more and more, and mainly comprises soft equipment and hard equipment. The early-stage equipment for underwater defense has the advantages of few types, independent shipment, no use influence with other equipment and relatively simple use method.
With the increase of the variety of soft and hard equipment, the surface vessels are equipped with various soft and hard equipment of different types. And because the action range of the underwater defending soft and hard equipment is relatively close, the situation that the interval distance between the action areas of different equipment is too close or the areas overlap is unavoidable. The acoustic characteristics and the complexity of the hydrologic environment can cause mutual influence on the use of different types of equipment, so that the comprehensive use effect of the soft and hard equipment is influenced.
Therefore, a testing method for testing main characteristics of acoustic compatibility among different types of soft and hard equipment under water environmental conditions is required to be provided, the test of the acoustic compatibility characteristics among different types of soft and hard equipment is supported, the safe working distance for the acoustic compatibility use among different types of soft and hard equipment is determined, and the comprehensive use design and evaluation of the soft and hard equipment are supported, so that reasonable use of various soft and hard equipment is realized, and the use effect is improved.
Disclosure of Invention
Aiming at the defects or improvement demands of the prior art, the application provides a testing method based on step progressive control, which is used for testing main acoustic characteristics of acoustic compatibility among different soft and hard equipment, determining minimum safe working distance for acoustic compatibility among different soft and hard equipment, supporting water testing of acoustic compatibility among various soft and hard equipment, comprehensive use design and use efficiency evaluation of various soft and hard equipment.
In order to achieve the above purpose, the application provides a soft and hard equipment acoustic compatibility testing method based on step progressive control, which comprises the following steps:
based on acoustic theory, analyzing the influence of the soft equipment on the hard equipment, and determining the compatible minimum safe working distance between the soft equipment and the hard equipment in normal operation theoretically;
determining sounding equipment in soft equipment and receiving equipment in hard equipment, suspending the sounding equipment and the receiving equipment to corresponding depths under water according to the using state of equipment, and taking theoretical compatibility to use the minimum safe working distance as an initial setting value of the horizontal distance between the sounding equipment and the receiving equipment;
the test ship 1 carries sound equipment comprising soft equipment, signal acquisition equipment and a signal simulator for searching an attack target, and the test ship 2 carries receiving equipment comprising an attack target radiation noise simulator and hard equipment;
under the working condition of the soft equipment sounding equipment according to a specified working mode, an incoming target radiation noise simulator is utilized to simulate an incoming high-speed medium noise target to adjust the interval distance from far to near and from near to far relative to the receiving equipment of the hard equipment respectively at a preset navigational speed, the interference condition of the soft equipment on the hard equipment is judged by detecting the action condition of the hard equipment receiving equipment, and the minimum safe working distance compatible with the soft equipment and the hard equipment is tested and determined by continuously adjusting the interval distance between the test ship 1 and the test ship 2.
In some alternative embodiments, test vessel 1 carries sound emitting devices including soft equipment, signal acquisition devices including hydrophones, measurement amplifiers, band pass filters, and signal collectors, signal simulators for incoming target searches including signal sources, power amplifiers, and transmitting transducers, hydrological gauges, and oscilloscopes.
In some alternative embodiments, the sounding of the soft equipment is provided on test vessel 1The prepared acoustic component transmitting transducer is arranged under water h 11 m, the acoustic component receiving transducer is arranged under water h 12 m is the position; the signal simulator for target finding is laid under water h 13 m is the position; the hydrophone is arranged under water h 14 m and at a distance d from the soft-device acoustic element emitting transducer 1 m to monitor the acoustic signal emitted by the soft device.
In some alternative embodiments, test vessel 2 carries a system including an incoming target radiation noise simulator, a hard-ware receiving device, a hard-ware data reading and analyzing device, a synchronization signal generator, a signal acquisition device, and an oscilloscope.
In some alternative embodiments, the receiving device of the hard equipment is deployed under water h on test vessel 2 21 m is the position; the radiation noise simulator for future attack targets is laid under water h 22 m and spaced a distance d from the receiving device of the hard device 2 m; the hydrophone is arranged under water h 23 m, arranging adjacent to the receiving equipment of the hard equipment, and shielding the receiving equipment of the hard equipment from a mutually silent source so as to monitor underwater noise signals; hanging the synchronous signal generator under water for h 24 m。
In some alternative embodiments, the determining a compatible use minimum safe working distance of the soft and hard materials comprises:
testing a receiving device of a hard device at a starting distance point D 0 When working at the starting distance point D 0 When the receiving devices of the hard equipment work normally, the horizontal distance between the sound generating device of the soft equipment and the receiving device of the hard equipment is reduced by a certain distance step L, and the distance D is the distance point 1 Retesting, observing the working condition of the receiving equipment of the hard equipment, continuously reducing the horizontal distance until the condition that the receiving equipment of the hard equipment cannot work normally exists in the test sample, and recording the current distance D i+1 Continuously reducing the horizontal distance in sequence, at D i+2 Verifying in distance, if the receiving equipment of the hard equipment is verified to work abnormally, D i+1 And D i For critical distance segment, take D i The minimum safe working distance is used for compatibility.
In some alternative embodiments, when at the starting distance point D 0 When the receiving device of the hard equipment works abnormally, the horizontal distance between the sound generating device of the soft equipment and the receiving device of the hard equipment is increased by a certain distance step L, and the horizontal distance is measured at a distance point D 1 Retesting, observing the working condition of the receiving equipment of the hard equipment, continuously increasing the horizontal distance until the condition that the receiving equipment of the hard equipment can work normally exists in the test sample, and recording the current distance D j+1 Continuously increasing the horizontal distance in turn, at D j+2 Verifying in distance, if the receiving equipment of the hard equipment works normally, D j+1 And D j For critical distance segment, take D j+1 The minimum safe working distance is used for compatibility.
In general, the above technical solutions conceived by the present application, compared with the prior art, enable the following beneficial effects to be obtained:
and the acoustic compatibility test between the supporting soft and hard equipment is carried out, the minimum safe working distance for compatibility use between the soft and hard equipment under the water condition is determined, the analysis and evaluation of the use design and the use effect of the soft and hard equipment are supported, and the support is provided for the system design and capability evaluation of the high-speed small target under the water surface ship.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of an equipment arrangement provided by an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 2 is a layout diagram of equipment of the test ship 1 according to the embodiment of the application;
FIG. 3 is a layout view of equipment of the test boat 2 according to the embodiment of the application;
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a far and near compatible working distance test according to an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 5 is a schematic diagram of a near-to-far compatible working distance test according to an embodiment of the present application.
Detailed Description
The present application will be described in further detail with reference to the drawings and examples, in order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present application more apparent. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the application. In addition, the technical features of the embodiments of the present application described below may be combined with each other as long as they do not collide with each other.
In practical applications, the types and characteristics of the hard and soft devices may vary with the actual technical state of the equipment. The application selects typical soft and hard equipment as an example, tests the safe working distance of acoustic compatibility between the soft equipment and the hard equipment, and comprises the following steps:
(1) Theoretical analysis of acoustic effects: according to the equipment characteristics of the soft and hard equipment, the influence of the soft equipment on the hard equipment is analyzed based on an acoustic theory, and the compatible minimum safe working distance between the soft equipment and the hard equipment in normal working is determined.
(2) Soft and hard equipment arrangement: as shown in fig. 1, the soft equipment acoustic extension or acoustic component is used as a sound generating device, and the hard equipment fuze is used as an acoustic signal receiving device. The equipment reference equipment is suspended to the corresponding depth under water, and the minimum safe working distance is used as the initial setting value of the horizontal distance between the sounding equipment and the receiving equipment in a theoretical analysis compatible mode.
(3) Test equipment arrangement: according to the test requirements, the test ship 1 carries a soft equipment acoustic extension or acoustic component, signal acquisition equipment (including hydrophones, measurement amplifiers, band-pass filters, signal collectors and the like), a signal simulator (including signal sources, power amplifiers, emission transducers and the like) for searching an attack target, a hydrological measuring instrument, an oscilloscope and other guarantee tools. The test ship 2 carries the coming target radiation noise simulator, the hard equipment acoustic fuze, the hard equipment data reading and analyzing equipment, the synchronous signal generator, the signal acquisition equipment, the oscillograph and other guarantee tools and consumables. The oscillograph is connected with the signal acquisition equipment through the three-way connector so as to synchronously monitor various underwater sound signals.
As shown in FIG. 2, on a test vessel 1, a soft-equipment acoustic component transmitting transducer is deployed under water h 11 m, its receiving transducer is placed under water h 12 m is the position; future attack targeting letterThe number simulator is laid under water h 13 m is the position; the hydrophone is arranged under water h 14 m and at a distance d from the soft-device acoustic element emitting transducer 1 m (which can be adjusted according to the actual arrangement conditions), and monitoring the acoustic signals emitted by the soft equipment.
As shown in fig. 3, on the test ship 2, the hard equipment acoustic fuze is deployed under water h 21 m is the position; the radiation noise simulator for future attack targets is laid under water h 22 m and a certain distance d from the hard material acoustic fuze 2 m (can be adjusted according to the actual laying condition); the hydrophone is arranged under water h 23 m, arranging adjacent hard equipment acoustic fuses (the hard equipment acoustic fuses are mutually free from sound source shielding), and monitoring underwater noise signals; hanging the synchronous signal generator under water for h 24 m。
Wherein, it should be noted that each hanging device can be provided with a weight, so as to ensure the hanging posture and depth of the device; safety ropes are additionally arranged on each lifting device to prevent the devices from falling off.
(4) Compatible use minimum safe working distance test: under the working condition of the soft equipment sounding device according to a specified working mode, an incoming target radiation noise simulator is utilized to simulate an incoming high-speed medium noise target to adjust the interval distance from far to near to far to the hard equipment acoustic fuse in a preset navigational speed (such as a range of 40 kn-50 kn) respectively, and the interference condition of the soft equipment device on the hard equipment is judged by detecting the action condition of the hard equipment acoustic fuse, namely whether the hard equipment works normally or not. And the minimum safe working distance compatible with the soft equipment and the hard equipment is tested and determined by continuously adjusting the interval distance of the test equipment.
In the embodiment of the present application, the specific process of step (4) is as follows:
testing the hard device acoustic fuse at the starting distance point D 0 Is a working condition of (2);
as shown in FIG. 4, when at the starting distance point D 0 When the acoustic fuses are all working normally, the horizontal distance between the acoustic parts of the soft equipment and the acoustic fuses of the hard equipment is reduced by a certain distance step L. At a distance point D 1 Retest, and observe hardThe equipment sound fuzes the working condition. Continuously reducing the horizontal distance until the hard equipment acoustic fuse cannot work normally in the test sample, and recording the current distance D i+1 . Continuously and sequentially reducing the horizontal distance, at D i+2 Verifying in distance, if verification that there is abnormal operation condition of acoustic fuze, D i+1 And D i For critical distance segment, take D i The minimum safe working distance is used for compatibility.
As shown in FIG. 5, when at the starting distance point D 0 When the acoustic fuse at the position works abnormally, the horizontal distance between the acoustic component of the soft equipment and the acoustic fuse of the hard equipment is increased by a certain distance step L. At a distance point D 1 Retesting and observing the hard equipment acoustic fuze working condition. Continuously increasing the horizontal distance until the hard equipment acoustic fuse in the test sample can work normally, and recording the current distance D j+1 . Continuously increasing the horizontal spacing in turn, at D j+2 Verifying in distance, if the condition of normal operation of the acoustic fuze exists, D j+1 And D j For critical distance segment, take D j+ 1 is the compatible minimum safe working distance.
The application provides a soft and hard equipment acoustic compatibility testing method based on step progressive control, which is used for testing the acoustic compatibility working influence among different soft and hard equipment and determining the minimum safe working distance for acoustic compatibility use among different soft and hard equipment.
For the method of the present application, specific embodiments are described below using a minimum safe working distance test for compatibility between a certain acoustic lure and a small caliber suspension type deep projectile as an example:
1) Acoustic impact analysis and test parameter setting:
according to the acoustic parameter analysis and estimation of the equipment, the maximum influence distance of the acoustic decoy on the suspended deep projectile in the working mode 1 is about 100m; the influence distance of the operating mode 2 is about 50m.
Comprehensively considering factors such as test operability and the like, wherein the step length L takes a value of 10m when the sound bait is tested; under different working modes of the acoustic bait, the initial values of the separation distances of the test ship 1 and the test ship 2 are respectively D 0 =100m and D 0 ＝50m。
As shown in fig. 2, relevant equipment is arranged on the test ship 1, and the position parameters are respectively as follows: h is a 11 ＝16m、h 12 ＝11m、h 13 ＝11m、h 14 ＝16m、d 1 ＝4m。
As shown in fig. 3, relevant equipment is arranged on the test ship 2, and the position parameters are respectively as follows: h is a 21 ＝17m、h 22 ＝18m、h 23 ＝18m、h 24 ＝18m、d 2 ＝10m。
2) Testing whether the sound bait is in different modes to influence the normal operation of the hard equipment:
starting up signal acquisition equipment on the test ship 1 and the test ship 2 and starting recording acoustic signals received by the hydrophones; starting up the hard equipment acoustic fuze on the test ship 2, starting up the soft equipment acoustic extension on the test ship 1 after 8s and working in a specified working mode, transmitting a synchronous pulse signal on the test ship 2 after 10s, starting up the target radiation noise simulator, transmitting the simulated target radiation noise signal, and checking whether the hard equipment acoustic fuze function is normal.
3) The minimum safe working distance is used for testing compatibility between the sound bait and the hard equipment:
according to the working condition of the hard equipment in the step 2), the distance between the two vessels is adjusted by adjusting the position of the test vessel 2, the step length is 10m, and the test is carried out according to the test method in the step 2). And continuously adjusting the distance between the two ships, and finally measuring the working mode 1 and the working mode 2, wherein the minimum safe working distance for compatible use of the soft equipment and the hard equipment is about 90m and 60m respectively.
In the practical application process, the distance between the acoustic component and the testing equipment can be properly adjusted or the step length can be adjusted by combining factors such as the ship platform and the environmental conditions of the water test, so that the test efficiency is improved.
The foregoing is merely a typical theoretical implementation example of the present application, and is not limited to any form and application condition of the present application, and those skilled in the art may make various simple modifications, such as adjustment of the type of the soft and hard equipment, change of the typical test environment, change of the typical situation, change of the values of the main elements or adjustment of non-main factors, etc., by using the foregoing technical content, all of which fall within the scope of the present application.
It should be noted that each step/component described in the present application may be split into more steps/components, or two or more steps/components or part of operations of the steps/components may be combined into new steps/components, according to the implementation needs, to achieve the object of the present application.
It will be readily appreciated by those skilled in the art that the foregoing description is merely a preferred embodiment of the application and is not intended to limit the application, but any modifications, equivalents, improvements or alternatives falling within the spirit and principles of the application are intended to be included within the scope of the application.
Claims (7)
1. A soft and hard equipment acoustic compatibility testing method based on step progressive control is characterized by comprising the following steps:
based on acoustic theory, analyzing the influence of the soft equipment on the hard equipment, and determining the compatible minimum safe working distance between the soft equipment and the hard equipment in normal operation theoretically;
determining sounding equipment in soft equipment and receiving equipment in hard equipment, suspending the sounding equipment and the receiving equipment to corresponding depths under water according to the using state of equipment, and taking theoretical compatibility to use the minimum safe working distance as an initial setting value of the horizontal distance between the sounding equipment and the receiving equipment;
the test ship 1 carries sound equipment comprising soft equipment, signal acquisition equipment and a signal simulator for searching an attack target, and the test ship 2 carries receiving equipment comprising an attack target radiation noise simulator and hard equipment;
under the working condition of the soft equipment sounding equipment according to a specified working mode, an incoming target radiation noise simulator is utilized to simulate an incoming high-speed medium noise target, the interval distance is adjusted from far to near to far relative to the receiving equipment of the hard equipment in a preset navigational speed mode respectively, the interference condition of the soft equipment on the hard equipment is judged by detecting the action condition of the hard equipment receiving equipment, and the minimum safe working distance compatible with the soft equipment and the hard equipment is tested and determined by continuously adjusting the interval distance between the test ship 1 and the test ship 2.
2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the test vessel 1 carries sound-emitting devices comprising soft equipment, signal-collecting devices comprising hydrophones, measurement amplifiers, band-pass filters and signal collectors, signal simulators for incoming target searches comprising signal sources, power amplifiers and transmitting transducers, hydrographic meters and oscilloscopes.
3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that on the test vessel 1, the acoustic component emitting transducers of the sound emitting device of the soft equipment are deployed under water h 11 m, the acoustic component receiving transducer is arranged under water h 12 m is the position; the signal simulator for target finding is laid under water h 13 m is the position; the hydrophone is arranged under water h 14 m and at a distance d from the soft-device acoustic element emitting transducer 1 m to monitor the acoustic signal emitted by the soft device.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the test vessel 2 carries a receiving device including an incoming target radiation noise simulator, a hard equipment data reading and analyzing device, a synchronizing signal generator, a signal acquisition device and an oscilloscope.
5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the receiving device of the hard equipment is deployed under water h on the test vessel 2 21 m is the position; the radiation noise simulator for future attack targets is laid under water h 22 m and spaced a distance d from the receiving device of the hard device 2 m; the hydrophone is arranged under water h 23 m, arranging adjacent to the receiving equipment of the hard equipment, and shielding the receiving equipment of the hard equipment from a mutually silent source so as to monitor underwater noise signals; hanging the synchronous signal generator under water for h 24 m。
6. The method of any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein determining a compatible use minimum safe working distance for a soft and hard device comprises:
testing a receiving device of a hard device at a starting distance point D 0 When working at the starting distance point D 0 When the receiving devices of the hard equipment work normally, the horizontal distance between the sound generating device of the soft equipment and the receiving device of the hard equipment is reduced by a certain distance step L, and the distance D is the distance point 1 Retesting, observing the working condition of the receiving equipment of the hard equipment, continuously reducing the horizontal distance until the condition that the receiving equipment of the hard equipment cannot work normally exists in the test sample, and recording the current distance D i+1 Continuously reducing the horizontal distance in sequence, at D i+2 Verifying in distance, if the receiving equipment of the hard equipment is verified to work abnormally, D i+1 And D i For critical distance segment, take D i The minimum safe working distance is used for compatibility.
7. The method according to claim 6, wherein, when at the starting distance point D 0 When the receiving device of the hard equipment works abnormally, the horizontal distance between the sound generating device of the soft equipment and the receiving device of the hard equipment is increased by a certain distance step L, and the horizontal distance is measured at a distance point D 1 Retesting, observing the working condition of the receiving equipment of the hard equipment, continuously increasing the horizontal distance until the condition that the receiving equipment of the hard equipment can work normally exists in the test sample, and recording the current distance D j+1 Continuously increasing the horizontal distance in turn, at D j+2 Verifying in distance, if the receiving equipment of the hard equipment works normally, D j+1 And D j For critical distance segment, take D j+1 The minimum safe working distance is used for compatibility.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202310470440.2A CN116699578B (en) | 2023-04-27 | 2023-04-27 | Soft and hard equipment inter-sound compatibility testing method based on step progressive control |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202310470440.2A CN116699578B (en) | 2023-04-27 | 2023-04-27 | Soft and hard equipment inter-sound compatibility testing method based on step progressive control |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN116699578A true CN116699578A (en) | 2023-09-05 |
| CN116699578B CN116699578B (en) | 2024-03-15 |
Family
ID=87840049
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202310470440.2A Active CN116699578B (en) | 2023-04-27 | 2023-04-27 | Soft and hard equipment inter-sound compatibility testing method based on step progressive control |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN116699578B (en) |
Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20190195601A1 (en) * | 2016-08-07 | 2019-06-27 | Mordechay FINKENBERG | A method for neutralizing a threat |
| US11181346B1 (en) * | 2019-09-30 | 2021-11-23 | Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. | Methods for enhanced soft-kill countermeasure using a tracking radar |
| CN115406479A (en) * | 2022-09-19 | 2022-11-29 | 中国舰船研究设计中心 | Sound compatibility real ship quantitative test method for ship-mounted bulbous bow underwater sound equipment |
| CN115549813A (en) * | 2022-09-19 | 2022-12-30 | 中国舰船研究设计中心 | Sound compatibility lake test method of communication underwater sound equipment |
| CN115792871A (en) * | 2022-09-22 | 2023-03-14 | 中国舰船研究设计中心 | Acoustic compatibility lake test method for spherical bow underwater acoustic equipment to drag line array |
| KR102510468B1 (en) * | 2022-07-07 | 2023-03-15 | 한화시스템 주식회사 | Warship defense system and warship defense method |
-
2023
- 2023-04-27 CN CN202310470440.2A patent/CN116699578B/en active Active
Patent Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20190195601A1 (en) * | 2016-08-07 | 2019-06-27 | Mordechay FINKENBERG | A method for neutralizing a threat |
| US11181346B1 (en) * | 2019-09-30 | 2021-11-23 | Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. | Methods for enhanced soft-kill countermeasure using a tracking radar |
| KR102510468B1 (en) * | 2022-07-07 | 2023-03-15 | 한화시스템 주식회사 | Warship defense system and warship defense method |
| CN115406479A (en) * | 2022-09-19 | 2022-11-29 | 中国舰船研究设计中心 | Sound compatibility real ship quantitative test method for ship-mounted bulbous bow underwater sound equipment |
| CN115549813A (en) * | 2022-09-19 | 2022-12-30 | 中国舰船研究设计中心 | Sound compatibility lake test method of communication underwater sound equipment |
| CN115792871A (en) * | 2022-09-22 | 2023-03-14 | 中国舰船研究设计中心 | Acoustic compatibility lake test method for spherical bow underwater acoustic equipment to drag line array |
Non-Patent Citations (4)
| Title |
|---|
| QIN JIANDONG; WU XIAOFENG: "Modeling and simulation on the compatibility of ship-to-air missile and chaff centroid jamming in cooperative air-defense", 2017 IEEE 2ND ADVANCED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, ELECTRONIC AND AUTOMATION CONTROL CONFERENCE (IAEAC), 2 October 2017 (2017-10-02) * |
| 卢万;李钊;: "国外反鱼雷水声对抗技术与发展趋势", 舰船电子对抗, no. 01, 25 February 2008 (2008-02-25) * |
| 寇祝;任磊;康春玉;: "考虑声兼容影响的悬浮式深弹布放模型", 指挥控制与仿真, no. 03, 14 November 2019 (2019-11-14) * |
| 房毅: "悬浮式深弹反鱼雷武器仿真试验系统设计", 兵器装备工程学报, 30 June 2016 (2016-06-30) * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN116699578B (en) | 2024-03-15 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA1107851A (en) | Automatic system and method for testing marine streamers of seismic exploration systems | |
| CN108459083B (en) | A kind of detection system and its detection method for concrete dam | |
| CN109143208B (en) | Ship sonar platform self-noise test system and horizontal test method | |
| CN106886015A (en) | A kind of detection means and detection method of multibeam sonar primary acoustic index | |
| CN106290580B (en) | Vacuum high-low frequency acoustic measurement device and method | |
| NO162358B (en) | PROCEDURE FOR MONITORING A STRUCTURE USING Acoustic ENERGY. | |
| CN116699578B (en) | Soft and hard equipment inter-sound compatibility testing method based on step progressive control | |
| CN112881756B (en) | Three-way impact acceleration sensor installation mode validity checking system and method | |
| CN104215202B (en) | Depth finder based method for measuring height from bottom to sampler | |
| NO346026B1 (en) | Time-efficient tests to detect faults in seismic air guns | |
| Ni et al. | Monitoring the stability of airgun source array signature | |
| CN111308421A (en) | Method for acquiring acoustic radiation of target free field in shallow sea | |
| US8264909B2 (en) | System and method for depth determination of an impulse acoustic source by cepstral analysis | |
| JP7380891B2 (en) | Unidentified sound extraction device and unidentified sound extraction method | |
| US20020118599A1 (en) | Target simulation system and method | |
| CN109814076A (en) | For testing the test macro and method of the performance of detector | |
| CN111521076B (en) | Method for testing position of explosion point in ship cabin | |
| RU115077U1 (en) | HYDROACOUSTIC SIGNALS SIMULATOR | |
| US8154956B2 (en) | Marine acoustic source operation | |
| CN111665488B (en) | Aviation sonar buoy test method and system | |
| CN108594083A (en) | A kind of scaling method of power cable fault electric discharge acoustic wave form starting point | |
| Hu et al. | Research on Low Radiation Noise Measurement System Based on a Bottom-Mounted Vector Hydrophone Array | |
| KR101570062B1 (en) | System and method for measuring the rate of fire using sound pressure | |
| KR100922443B1 (en) | A Sensor Tone Managing Method for Guided Missiles using Audio Band Signal Analysis | |
| Song et al. | Simulation of Backscatter Signal of Submarine Target Based on Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Target Intensity |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |