CN116579665B - Emergency plan evaluation method, device and storage medium - Google Patents
Emergency plan evaluation method, device and storage medium Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN116579665B CN116579665B CN202310833868.9A CN202310833868A CN116579665B CN 116579665 B CN116579665 B CN 116579665B CN 202310833868 A CN202310833868 A CN 202310833868A CN 116579665 B CN116579665 B CN 116579665B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- emergency
- evaluation
- departments
- layer
- plan
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 234
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 40
- 238000013210 evaluation model Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 31
- 230000015654 memory Effects 0.000 claims description 18
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 claims description 17
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 abstract description 6
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 13
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 12
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000010485 coping Effects 0.000 description 3
- 210000001503 joint Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003032 molecular docking Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000819 phase cycle Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 206010039203 Road traffic accident Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000019771 cognition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012854 evaluation process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000802 evaporation-induced self-assembly Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010006 flight Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010801 machine learning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005180 public health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013468 resource allocation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000011218 segmentation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006403 short-term memory Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F40/00—Handling natural language data
- G06F40/10—Text processing
- G06F40/194—Calculation of difference between files
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/26—Government or public services
- G06Q50/265—Personal security, identity or safety
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Audiology, Speech & Language Pathology (AREA)
- Computational Linguistics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The application discloses an assessment method and device of an emergency plan and a storage medium, and relates to the technical field of data processing. The emergency plan of each emergency department is input into an emergency plan evaluation model by acquiring an emergency plan which is applied to the emergency department and is made by each emergency department aiming at a target emergency, so that an evaluation result is obtained, the emergency plan evaluation model comprises a theme evaluation layer, a main body evaluation layer, a task evaluation layer and a resource evaluation layer from top to bottom, consistency evaluation is respectively carried out on the emergency theme, the emergency department, the task and the resource of the emergency plan, the next evaluation layer is entered when the output result of any evaluation layer is yes, and the evaluation result of the evaluation layer is output when the output result of any evaluation layer is no, so that the evaluation is ended. According to the application, by means of the emergency plan evaluation model with the multi-evaluation layer structure, the multi-dimensional validity evaluation is carried out on the emergency plan, the evaluation is carried out on the connection condition of each layer, the comprehensiveness and the accuracy degree of the evaluation are improved, and the integral unification of the emergency plan is ensured.
Description
Technical Field
The present application relates to the field of data processing technologies, and in particular, to a method and apparatus for evaluating an emergency plan, and a storage medium.
Background
The emergency plan is a preparation plan containing emergency management, command, rescue plan and other contents formulated when facing the emergency, and is used for coping with threat and harm brought by the emergency. When a significant incident occurs, it is often necessary to initiate multiple emergency protocols that are effective against the incident, and the aggregate of these emergency protocols is then effective.
In the related technology, when the validity of the emergency plan is evaluated, an analytic hierarchy process, a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and a good and bad distance method (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution, TOPSIS method for short) are adopted, the validity evaluation is carried out on the whole emergency plan, and the connection strategy inside the emergency plan has less attention, so that the problems of incomplete evaluation dimension and inaccurate evaluation result exist.
Disclosure of Invention
The application mainly aims to provide an assessment method, an assessment device and a storage medium of an emergency plan, and aims to solve the technical problems of incomplete assessment dimension and inaccurate result in the existing assessment scheme.
To achieve the above object, in a first aspect, the present application provides a method for evaluating an emergency plan, including: the method comprises the steps that emergency plans, which are made by each emergency department aiming at a target emergency and applied to the emergency department, are obtained, each emergency plan comprises an emergency theme, a plurality of emergency departments, tasks and resources, wherein the emergency departments comprise transverse connection relations and/or longitudinal connection relations, the tasks comprise independent tasks of the emergency department and cooperation tasks with other emergency departments, and the resources comprise independent resources of the emergency department and cooperation resources with other emergency departments; inputting an emergency plan into an emergency plan evaluation model to obtain an evaluation result, wherein the emergency plan evaluation model comprises a theme evaluation layer, a main body evaluation layer, a task evaluation layer and a resource evaluation layer from top to bottom, determining whether emergency themes contained in each emergency plan are consistent through the theme evaluation layer, determining whether connection relations among a plurality of emergency departments contained in each emergency plan and a plurality of emergency departments are consistent through the main body evaluation layer, determining whether independent tasks of each emergency department contained in each emergency plan are consistent with cooperation tasks of other emergency departments through the task evaluation layer, and determining whether independent resources of each emergency department contained in each emergency plan are consistent with cooperation resources of other emergency departments through the resource evaluation layer; when any one of the theme assessment layer, the main body assessment layer, the task assessment layer and the resource assessment layer outputs yes, entering the next assessment layer until the information of each emergency plan is consistent, and ending the assessment; and outputting an evaluation result of the evaluation layer when the output result of any evaluation layer is negative, and ending the evaluation.
Optionally, determining, by the topic evaluation layer, whether the emergency topics contained in each emergency plan are consistent includes: adopting a character recognition algorithm to acquire emergency topics contained in each emergency plan, and determining whether the emergency topics are consistent; if yes, entering a main body evaluation layer; if not, outputting first data used for representing inconsistency of emergency subjects.
Optionally, determining, by the subject evaluation layer, whether the multiple emergency departments included in each emergency plan and the engagement relationships between the multiple emergency departments are consistent includes: acquiring a plurality of emergency departments contained in each emergency plan and connection relations among the emergency departments by adopting an information extraction algorithm; determining whether the connection relations among the emergency departments are consistent or not by adopting a text similarity algorithm; if yes, entering a task evaluation layer; if not, outputting second data used for representing inconsistency of emergency departments.
Optionally, determining, by the subject evaluation layer, whether the multiple emergency departments included in each emergency plan and the engagement relationships between the multiple emergency departments are consistent includes: obtaining standard emergency department architecture information corresponding to an emergency theme; determining whether the connection relation among a plurality of emergency departments contained in each emergency plan is consistent with the standard emergency department architecture information; if yes, entering a task evaluation layer; if not, outputting second data used for representing inconsistency of emergency departments.
Optionally, determining, by the task evaluation layer, whether the independent task of each emergency department and the cooperative task of the other emergency departments included in each emergency plan are consistent includes: an information extraction algorithm is adopted to obtain independent tasks corresponding to each emergency department and collaborative task information of other emergency departments contained in each emergency plan; determining whether independent tasks corresponding to each emergency department are consistent with the cooperation tasks of other emergency departments or not by adopting a text similarity algorithm; if yes, entering a resource evaluation layer; if not, outputting third data for representing inconsistent tasks.
Optionally, determining, by the resource evaluation layer, whether the independent resource of each emergency department and the collaborative resource of other emergency departments contained in each emergency plan are consistent includes: an information extraction algorithm is adopted to obtain independent resources of each emergency department and cooperative resource information of other emergency departments contained in each emergency plan; determining whether independent resources of each emergency department are consistent with cooperative resource information of other emergency departments by adopting a text similarity algorithm; if yes, outputting fourth data used for representing the consistency of the information of each emergency plan, and ending the evaluation; if not, outputting fifth data for representing resource inconsistency.
Optionally, the evaluation method further comprises: and according to the evaluation result, adjusting the emergency plan with inconsistent information.
In a second aspect, the present application provides an apparatus for evaluating an emergency plan, comprising: the system comprises an acquisition module, a control module and a control module, wherein the acquisition module is used for acquiring emergency plans which are made by each emergency department aiming at a target emergency and applied to the emergency department, each emergency plan comprises an emergency theme, a plurality of emergency departments, tasks and resources, the emergency departments comprise transverse connection relations and/or longitudinal connection relations, the tasks comprise independent tasks of the emergency department and cooperation tasks with other emergency departments, and the resources comprise independent resources of the emergency department and cooperation resources with other emergency departments; the system comprises an input module, a task evaluation module and a resource evaluation module, wherein the input module is used for inputting an emergency plan into the emergency plan evaluation model to obtain an evaluation result, the emergency plan evaluation model comprises a theme evaluation layer, a main body evaluation layer, a task evaluation layer and a resource evaluation layer from top to bottom, whether emergency topics contained in each emergency plan are consistent or not is determined through the theme evaluation layer, whether connection relations among a plurality of emergency departments contained in each emergency plan and a plurality of emergency departments are consistent or not is determined through the main body evaluation layer, whether independent tasks of each emergency department contained in each emergency plan are consistent with cooperation tasks of other emergency departments or not is determined through the task evaluation layer, and whether independent resources of each emergency department contained in each emergency plan are consistent with cooperation resources of other emergency departments or not is determined through the resource evaluation layer; when any one of the theme assessment layer, the main body assessment layer, the task assessment layer and the resource assessment layer outputs yes, entering the next assessment layer until the information of each emergency plan is consistent, and ending the assessment; and outputting an evaluation result of the evaluation layer when the output result of any evaluation layer is negative, and ending the evaluation.
In a third aspect, the present application provides an electronic device comprising: a memory, a processor; a memory for storing program instructions; a processor for invoking program instructions to perform the assessment method as provided in any one of the first aspects above.
In a fourth aspect, the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium having stored therein computer-executable instructions which, when executed by a processor, are adapted to carry out the assessment method as provided in any one of the first aspects above.
In a fifth aspect, the present application provides a computer program product comprising a computer program; the computer program, when executed, implements the assessment method as provided in any one of the first aspects above.
According to the method, the device and the storage medium for evaluating the emergency plans, the emergency plans which are made by each emergency department aiming at the target emergency and applied to the emergency department are obtained, each emergency plan comprises an emergency theme, a plurality of emergency departments, tasks and resources, the emergency departments comprise transverse connection relations and/or longitudinal connection relations, the tasks comprise independent tasks of the emergency department and cooperation tasks with other emergency departments, and the resources comprise independent resources of the emergency department and cooperation resources with other emergency departments; inputting an emergency plan into an emergency plan evaluation model to obtain an evaluation result, wherein the emergency plan evaluation model comprises a theme evaluation layer, a main body evaluation layer, a task evaluation layer and a resource evaluation layer from top to bottom, determining whether emergency themes contained in each emergency plan are consistent through the theme evaluation layer, determining whether connection relations among a plurality of emergency departments contained in each emergency plan and a plurality of emergency departments are consistent through the main body evaluation layer, determining whether independent tasks of each emergency department contained in each emergency plan are consistent with cooperation tasks of other emergency departments through the task evaluation layer, and determining whether independent resources of each emergency department contained in each emergency plan are consistent with cooperation resources of other emergency departments through the resource evaluation layer; when any one of the theme assessment layer, the main body assessment layer, the task assessment layer and the resource assessment layer outputs yes, entering the next assessment layer until the information of each emergency plan is consistent, and ending the assessment; and outputting an evaluation result of the evaluation layer when the output result of any evaluation layer is negative, and ending the evaluation.
The beneficial effects of the application are as follows: by means of an emergency plan assessment model with a multi-assessment layer structure, multi-dimensional effectiveness assessment is carried out on an emergency plan, in the assessment of each layer, assessment is carried out on emergency subjects, emergency departments and task and resource connection conditions of each emergency department, the connection conditions comprise connection relations, communication contents related to connection, task cooperation contents, cross emergency treatment resources, combined training and exercise conditions and the like, the comprehensiveness and accuracy degree of the assessment are improved, the overall unification of the emergency plan is ensured, and each emergency department effectively cooperates, so that the response efficiency of an emergency response system is improved.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a schematic view of an application scenario provided in an embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating a method for evaluating an emergency plan according to an embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 3 is a schematic structural diagram of an emergency plan evaluation model according to an embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 4 is a schematic structural diagram of an apparatus for evaluating an emergency plan according to an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 5 is a schematic structural diagram of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present application.
The achievement of the objects, functional features and advantages of the present application will be further described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in conjunction with the embodiments.
Detailed Description
It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the application. Reference will now be made in detail to exemplary embodiments, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. When the following description refers to the accompanying drawings, the same numbers in different drawings refer to the same or similar elements, unless otherwise indicated. The implementations described in the following exemplary examples do not represent all implementations consistent with the application. Rather, they are merely examples of apparatus and methods consistent with aspects of the application as detailed in the accompanying claims.
Fig. 1 is a schematic view of an application scenario provided in an embodiment of the present application. As shown in fig. 1, the application scenario involves an emergency event 101, an emergency plan 102, and an emergency assessment system 103.
Incident 101 refers to a natural disaster, an accident disaster, a public health event and a social security event, such as fire, drought, geological disaster, and a security accident under a specific scene, such as an airport incident, a subway incident, a high-speed train traffic accident, etc., which are suddenly happened, causing or possibly causing serious social hazard, and need to be dealt with by emergency disposal measures.
The emergency plan 102 is used for coping with the emergency event 101, and generally includes organizing, commanding or coordinating the work contents of various hierarchical departments and units (emergency departments) that develop emergency work according to the emergency plan 102. In the embodiment of the present application, different emergency departments each make an emergency plan applicable to themselves, corresponding to sub-plan 1, sub-plan 2, sub-plans 3 and … … shown in fig. 1, that is, each sub-plan is compiled by a different emergency department, and each sub-plan describes a content applicable to the emergency department to develop emergency work, so that the content contained in the different sub-plans may be different and may also contain the same content, for example, the working content that needs a plurality of emergency departments to mutually cooperate may be respectively described in the respective emergency plans (sub-plans).
The emergency assessment system 103 is configured to assess the effectiveness of the emergency plan 102, that is, the effectiveness of multiple sub-plans, to obtain an assessment result. The emergency plan 102 as a whole may include multiple sub-plans of different levels and different types, and the validity of the emergency plan 102 as a whole is not limited to the validity of a single sub-plan, but also the validity of the engagement between sub-plans. The sub-schemes of different levels, the sub-schemes of the same level and the responsibilities of emergency departments in the units interact to form an organically-linked and dynamically-cooperated emergency response system.
In particular, the emergency plan 102 includes engagement relationships that include both longitudinal engagement and transverse engagement. Taking civil aviation emergency plan as an example, the longitudinal connection is represented by the connection of civil aviation bureau-regional administration-supervision bureau-civil aviation enterprise and public institution, and meanwhile, the mutual transverse connection exists between the civil aviation enterprise and public institution, such as an empty pipe unit-an airport-an airline company.
Because different sub-schemes are usually compiled by different emergency departments, the cognition of the different emergency departments on the same emergency 101 may be different, and when the corresponding sub-schemes are formed, the settings of various contents such as corresponding event level identification, personnel arrangement, resource scheduling, overall command, policy of coping with each department and linking relation may also be different. When aiming at a certain emergency, the sub-schemes are finally summarized to form an emergency plan 102 as a whole, but due to the information difference among the sub-schemes and the lack of a link, the emergency work has the following problems: the butt joint among the emergency departments is not clear; the docking procedures, the cooperation methods and how the resources are connected in the docking process of different emergency departments are not standardized; the scheme staff of many emergency departments lack basic knowledge of the emergency scene and the whole operation system thereof, and only the operation of the emergency department is emphasized during scheme preparation, but the docking program is ignored; the joint training and the joint exercise are absent.
The application aims to provide an assessment method of an emergency plan based on scene deduction, which can be used for really assessing whether various engagement relations contained in the emergency plan 102 are effective, ensuring that the emergency plan 102 is unified as a whole and each emergency department effectively cooperates, thereby improving the response efficiency of an emergency response system. In order to achieve a lateral or longitudinal engagement between multiple sub-schemes, the emergency plan is to provide an interface that enables engagement, while the emergency plan structure should facilitate engagement. The application provides a plan connection model, which can evaluate the connection degree of the existing emergency plan and provide a theoretical basis for compiling the butt joint content of the emergency plan.
Fig. 2 is a flowchart illustrating a method for evaluating an emergency plan according to an embodiment of the present application. As shown in fig. 2, the evaluation method includes:
s201: the method comprises the steps of obtaining emergency plans, which are made by each emergency department aiming at a target emergency and applied to the emergency department, wherein each emergency plan comprises an emergency theme, a plurality of emergency departments, tasks and resources, the emergency departments comprise transverse connection relations and/or longitudinal connection relations, the tasks comprise independent tasks of the emergency department and cooperation tasks with other emergency departments, and the resources comprise independent resources of the emergency department and cooperation resources with other emergency departments.
In this embodiment and the embodiments described below, the emergency plan refers to a sub-plan formulated by a certain emergency department. The target emergency corresponds to the emergency 101 in the above embodiment, and refers to an emergency corresponding to the emergency plan to be evaluated. Emergency topics are used to characterize categories of incidents, and may illustratively include feature keywords of incidents, such as context topics, event categories, ratings, place and time of occurrence, and so forth. Each emergency plan to be evaluated is typically compiled by a different emergency department or unit, describing the emergency work content of the emergency department or unit, and may also include collaborative emergency work content with the collaborative emergency department or unit, and in some embodiments, some or all of the emergency plans may also describe the emergency work content of all of the relevant emergency departments, respectively.
The emergency plan may be in an electronic document format or a picture format, for example. For example, the emergency plan may employ a unified form template including, but not limited to, an input box or filling box for emergency topics, multiple emergency departments, tasks, and resources, with different emergency departments entering or writing respective emergency plan content in the form template. The emergency plans of the target emergency can be obtained, for example, the emergency plans can be obtained from a plan management system of each emergency department, or a manual input mode can be directly adopted, and the emergency plans are not limited herein.
S202: the emergency plan is input into an emergency plan evaluation model to obtain an evaluation result, the emergency plan evaluation model comprises a theme evaluation layer, a main body evaluation layer, a task evaluation layer and a resource evaluation layer from top to bottom, whether emergency themes contained in each emergency plan are consistent or not is determined through the theme evaluation layer, whether connection relations among a plurality of emergency departments contained in each emergency plan and a plurality of emergency departments are consistent or not is determined through the main body evaluation layer, whether independent tasks of each emergency department contained in each emergency plan are consistent with cooperation tasks of other emergency departments or not is determined through the task evaluation layer, and whether independent resources of each emergency department contained in each emergency plan are consistent with cooperation resources of other emergency departments or not is determined through the resource evaluation layer.
Alternatively, the emergency plan assessment model may be machine learning model based, the specific implementation of which will be elucidated in the embodiments described below. When any one of the theme assessment layer, the main body assessment layer, the task assessment layer and the resource assessment layer outputs yes, entering the next assessment layer until the information of each emergency plan is consistent, and ending the assessment; and outputting an evaluation result of the evaluation layer when the output result of any evaluation layer is negative, and ending the evaluation.
Fig. 3 is a schematic structural diagram of an emergency plan evaluation model according to an embodiment of the present application. A specific explanation of the emergency plan assessment model is made in connection with fig. 3. As shown in fig. 3, the emergency plan evaluation model includes four evaluation layers, namely, a subject evaluation layer, a task evaluation layer and a resource evaluation layer from top to bottom.
The topic evaluation layer is used for evaluating emergency topics of the emergency plan, wherein the emergency topics include, but are not limited to, scene topics, event types, levels, occurrence places and time. Taking scenario topics as an example, the occurrence of a certain emergency event is often accompanied by multiple secondary derivative events and different treatment stages, and the secondary derivative events are usually executed by different emergency departments to perform main emergency work, so that each emergency plan may include multiple scenario topics connected in a transverse and/or longitudinal manner, and an initial scenario topic included in one emergency plan may be a derivative scenario topic of another emergency plan, where it is required to ensure that all scenario topics included in all emergency plans are consistent and corresponding. The topic evaluation layer acquires scene topic information contained in the emergency plans and performs similarity evaluation to ensure that all scene topics of all emergency plans are consistent.
For example, fig. 3 illustrates an initial scenario theme and a secondary derivative scenario theme included in a target emergency event, and a connection relationship therebetween, wherein a connection line between the illustrated scenario themes represents the secondary derivative relationship or the treatment stage precedence relationship. Different emergency plans may include all or part of the illustrated scenario theme. In addition, the theme evaluation layer can also ensure that the information such as event types, grades and the like of the positioning of the target emergency event by each emergency plan are consistent.
The main body evaluation layer is used for evaluating emergency departments contained in the emergency plans. As shown in fig. 3, an emergency theme corresponds to one or more main responsibility departments, and may further include one or more auxiliary departments, where a longitudinal and transverse connection relationship exists between the emergency departments, and a mutual cooperation relationship also exists between sub departments inside each emergency department. The main body evaluation layer can evaluate the consistency of each emergency department and the connection relation thereof contained in different emergency plans. Wherein each emergency plan may include all or part of the emergency department information.
The task assessment layer is used for assessing specific responsibilities/tasks of emergency departments of the emergency plans. The tasks have certain relativity and sequence, and the tasks are needed to be completed cooperatively by multiple emergency departments, namely, the tasks comprise independent tasks of the emergency department and cooperative tasks with other emergency departments. The resource evaluation layer is used for evaluating the allocation conditions of resources such as manpower, financial resources, material resources, technical schemes and the like required by execution of each task contained in the emergency plan, and the resources comprise independent resources of the emergency department and collaborative resources with other emergency departments.
After the emergency plan is input into the emergency plan evaluation model, the four evaluation layers evaluate the effectiveness of the emergency plan in turn, and the evaluation result of each evaluation layer is optionally output. For example, if the main evaluation layer determines that the emergency departments of the emergency plans are consistent, entering the task evaluation layer to continue evaluation, and optionally outputting data representing a plurality of emergency departments contained in the emergency plans and consistent connection relations among the emergency departments; after entering the task evaluation layer, if the evaluation result is inconsistent, outputting data used for representing the inconsistent independent task of each emergency department and the inconsistent collaborative task of other emergency departments contained in each emergency plan, ending the evaluation, and not executing the task to the lower layer. In the case that the output result of any evaluation layer is the evaluation result of the no-output evaluation layer, the evaluation result can also indicate a differential emergency plan which is inconsistent with other emergency plans, so that staff can quickly position the differential emergency plan to make modification.
According to the method for evaluating the emergency plan, which is provided by the embodiment of the application, by acquiring the emergency plans which are made by each emergency department aiming at the target emergency and are applied to the emergency department, each emergency plan comprises an emergency theme, a plurality of emergency departments, tasks and resources, wherein the emergency departments comprise transverse connection relations and/or longitudinal connection relations, the tasks comprise independent tasks of the emergency department and cooperation tasks with other emergency departments, and the resources comprise independent resources of the emergency department and cooperation resources with other emergency departments; inputting an emergency plan into an emergency plan evaluation model to obtain an evaluation result, wherein the emergency plan evaluation model comprises a theme evaluation layer, a main body evaluation layer, a task evaluation layer and a resource evaluation layer from top to bottom, determining whether emergency themes contained in each emergency plan are consistent through the theme evaluation layer, determining whether connection relations among a plurality of emergency departments contained in each emergency plan and a plurality of emergency departments are consistent through the main body evaluation layer, determining whether independent tasks of each emergency department contained in each emergency plan are consistent with cooperation tasks of other emergency departments through the task evaluation layer, and determining whether independent resources of each emergency department contained in each emergency plan are consistent with cooperation resources of other emergency departments through the resource evaluation layer; when any one of the theme assessment layer, the main body assessment layer, the task assessment layer and the resource assessment layer outputs yes, entering the next assessment layer until the information of each emergency plan is consistent, and ending the assessment; and outputting an evaluation result of the evaluation layer when the output result of any evaluation layer is negative, and ending the evaluation.
According to the embodiment of the application, the emergency plan is subjected to multidimensional validity assessment by means of the emergency plan assessment model with the multi-assessment layer structure, in the assessment of each layer, assessment is made on the emergency theme, the emergency departments and the task and resource connection conditions of each emergency department, wherein the connection conditions comprise connection relations, the communication content, the task cooperation content and the cross emergency treatment resource involved in connection, the joint training and exercise condition and the like, the comprehensiveness and the accuracy degree of the assessment are improved, the whole unification of the emergency plan is ensured, and each emergency department effectively cooperates, so that the response efficiency of an emergency response system is improved.
Optionally, determining, by the topic evaluation layer, whether the emergency topics contained in each emergency plan are consistent includes: adopting a character recognition algorithm to acquire emergency topics contained in each emergency plan, and determining whether the emergency topics are consistent; if yes, entering a main body evaluation layer; if not, outputting first data used for representing inconsistency of emergency subjects. Alternatively, the text recognition algorithm may be sequence feature extraction based on a densely connected convolutional network (Densely connected convolutional networks, abbreviated as DenseNet) network model, or may be context sequence feature extraction based on a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network structure, which is not limited herein.
In other embodiments, the emergency topic of the target incident may be determined by extracting keywords from the emergency plan, for example, by natural language algorithms. For example, the Jieba word segmentation algorithm is used to segment the title or the specified paragraph of the emergency plan to obtain a plurality of segmented words, and then the Term Frequency-inverse document Frequency algorithm (Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency, abbreviated as TF-IDF algorithm) is used to extract the keywords from the segmented words. In other embodiments, the emergency theme of the target emergency may be manually determined and input directly.
Optionally, determining, by the subject evaluation layer, whether the multiple emergency departments included in each emergency plan and the engagement relationships between the multiple emergency departments are consistent includes: acquiring a plurality of emergency departments contained in each emergency plan and connection relations among the emergency departments by adopting an information extraction algorithm; determining whether the connection relations among the emergency departments are consistent or not by adopting a text similarity algorithm; if yes, entering a task evaluation layer; if not, outputting second data used for representing inconsistency of emergency departments. The information extraction algorithm can extract various entities from the emergency plan text, namely, identify information such as subjects, predicates, objects and the like in the text, thereby extracting entity relations contained in the text, and acquire event types contained in the text from keywords, thereby combing out each event and relations between the entities contained in each event.
In this embodiment, after determining emergency departments and the connection relations between the emergency departments included in the emergency plan by adopting an information extraction algorithm, key information text for representing the information, for example, a structured or semi-structured key information text, may be output. And determining the similarity between the key information texts by adopting a text similarity algorithm, and judging that the connection relations are consistent when the similarity is higher than a certain threshold value.
Optionally, determining, by the subject evaluation layer, whether the multiple emergency departments included in each emergency plan and the engagement relationships between the multiple emergency departments are consistent includes: obtaining standard emergency department architecture information corresponding to an emergency theme; determining whether the connection relation among a plurality of emergency departments contained in each emergency plan is consistent with the standard emergency department architecture information; if yes, entering a task evaluation layer; if not, outputting second data used for representing inconsistency of emergency departments.
The standard emergency department architecture information corresponding to the emergency theme comprises emergency departments corresponding to the emergency theme and connection relations among the emergency departments, different emergency themes possibly correspond to different standard emergency department architecture information, and the standard emergency department architecture information can be established in advance and stored in a position which can be accessed by an emergency plan evaluation model. And comparing the emergency departments identified from the emergency plan and the connection relation among the emergency departments with standard emergency department architecture information to judge whether the emergency departments in the emergency plan are consistent.
Optionally, determining, by the task evaluation layer, whether the independent task of each emergency department and the cooperative task of the other emergency departments included in each emergency plan are consistent includes: an information extraction algorithm is adopted to obtain independent tasks corresponding to each emergency department and collaborative task information of other emergency departments contained in each emergency plan; determining whether independent tasks corresponding to each emergency department are consistent with the cooperation tasks of other emergency departments or not by adopting a text similarity algorithm; if yes, entering a resource evaluation layer; if not, outputting third data for representing inconsistent tasks.
Optionally, determining, by the resource assessment layer, whether the independent resource of each emergency department and the collaborative resource of other emergency departments contained in each emergency plan are consistent includes: an information extraction algorithm is adopted to obtain independent resources of each emergency department and cooperative resource information of other emergency departments contained in each emergency plan; determining whether independent resources of each emergency department are consistent with cooperative resource information of other emergency departments by adopting a text similarity algorithm; if yes, outputting fourth data used for representing the consistency of the information of each emergency plan, and ending the evaluation; if not, outputting fifth data for representing resource inconsistency.
On the basis of the above embodiment, optionally, the method further includes: and according to the evaluation result, adjusting the emergency plan with inconsistent information. Correspondingly, the evaluation result can indicate a differential emergency plan with inconsistent information, for example, the text content of the differential emergency plan is displayed through a display screen, and a specific position with inconsistent information is selected in a frame or highlighted mode. If the evaluation result shows that all information among the emergency plans is consistent, no adjustment is needed.
The evaluation process of the emergency plan evaluation model is explained in detail below in connection with fig. 3.
As shown in fig. 3, the topic evaluation layer shows a plurality of scenario topics, with the links between scenario topics representing secondary derivative relationships or treatment stage precedence relationships. And the theme evaluation layer determines a secondary derivative theme and/or a treatment stage sequence corresponding to the emergency theme according to the input emergency plan, so as to evaluate whether the emergency theme among all the sub-schemes is standard or unified.
The subject evaluation layer shows a plurality of emergency departments of a management office, a regulatory agency, an airport department subject, an airline department subject, and an air traffic control department subject. As can be seen from the connection lines in the figure, there are working engagement/cooperation situations between different emergency departments (longitudinal engagement) and between sub-departments within the same emergency department (transverse engagement). Illustratively, the emergency subject of the sub-scheme of the airport department main body Ai is the derivative subject of the sub-scheme of the administration, and the emergency subject and the derivative subject of the sub-scheme of the administration are ensured to be consistent; task cooperative content Bc of the sub-scheme of the airline department main body Bi and the empty management department main body Ci, and task cooperative content CB of the sub-scheme of the empty management department main body Ci and the airline department main body Bi are consistent, wherein the task cooperative content Bc is consistent with the task cooperative content CB of the empty management department main body Bi; the emergency department hierarchies contained in the different sub-schemes should also be consistent.
The task evaluation layer shows the connection relationship between a plurality of tasks. Each task may be the smallest unit of the corresponding task in all emergency plans, and the tasks may include work content, training or drill down, and the like. A certain task Ti may be performed simultaneously by one or more emergency departments, thus ensuring that the content of this task Ti in the emergency plans of the respective different emergency departments is consistent.
The resource assessment layer shows multiple categories of resources, the total amount of resources typically being limited. A certain amount of multiple resources may need to be invoked when executing a task, and different tasks may also require the same resource class.
In a specific embodiment, the theme evaluation layer of the emergency plan evaluation model automatically matches corresponding emergency themes, such as an initial scenario theme and a corresponding derivative theme and/or a treatment stage sequence, according to the target emergency event, so as to relatively evaluate whether the emergency themes among the sub-plans are uniform, and further evaluate whether the emergency event classification and response level standard among the emergency plans are uniform. The matching correspondence between the emergency topic and the derived topic and/or the treatment phase sequence may be established in advance, for example, obtained from the correspondence between the emergency topic and the derived topic and/or the treatment phase sequence when training the emergency plan evaluation model by using the historical emergency plan.
Correspondingly, the main body evaluation layer automatically matches the corresponding emergency departments and the connection relations between the emergency departments according to the determined emergency topics and the corresponding derivative topics and/or the treatment stage sequences thereof, so as to determine whether the emergency departments and the connection relations of the emergency plans of the target emergency are wrong. Each emergency plan may include one or more emergency departments and their connection contents with other emergency departments, and the subject evaluation layer may use a natural language algorithm to obtain keywords and grammatical relations between the keywords from the connection contents, thereby determining semantic meanings, and further determining whether the connection relations and/or communication contents between the emergency departments are clear.
Similarly, the task evaluation layer and the resource evaluation layer automatically match tasks and resources corresponding to each emergency department and cross tasks/connection tasks among the emergency departments according to the evaluation result of the previous evaluation layer. And further determining whether the connection relationship and the resource allocation among the tasks in the emergency plan are correct.
As is clear from the above emergency plan evaluation model, there is a horizontal or vertical association between nodes, a horizontal association between nodes of the same layer, and a vertical association between nodes of two adjacent layers, where the associations are determined by the secondary derived event outcome properties of the emergency and the flow of the emergency response: the vertical association represents an emergency response flow aiming at each secondary derivative event theme, namely theme-main body-task-resource, and represents the vertical connection between emergency response works of different dimensions, and also represents the vertical connection between different level plans; the transverse association mainly represents the association between similar nodes in each layer, and is mainly determined by a theme layer, the association between themes represents the precedence relationship between emergency response works and the secondary derivative event relationship, such as the scheduling of flights after large-area flight delay, information release and the disposal of passenger group events, and the association between main bodies represents the association generated by main body departments through the precedence relationship between executed themes or the cooperation and butt joint relationship of different main body departments when executing the same theme; the association between tasks is the order of work to complete the theme. The transverse association also represents the transverse connection between the same-level different classes of plans.
In the embodiment of the application, the four-layer evaluation layer structure of the emergency plan evaluation model evaluates the emergency plan layer by layer from top to bottom, and the lower-layer evaluation step is not executed when the upper-layer evaluation result is no. For example, when the evaluation result of the evaluation step of the emergency plan is no in the main body evaluation layer, outputting second data for representing inconsistency of emergency departments; the emergency plan evaluation model ends the evaluation. This reminds the user that the next level of evaluation can be performed after the emergency main body of the emergency plan is uniformly adjusted. The next level of evaluation is more effective after the emergency topics are unified.
Optionally, when the emergency plan is evaluated and found that the information of the emergency plan is inconsistent, the emergency plan evaluation model can display a history emergency plan related to the emergency theme for the user in addition to outputting an evaluation result, so as to provide a reference for the user. For example, these historical emergency plans may be stored in a memory module that can be accessed by an emergency plan assessment model.
The foregoing embodiments provide a detailed description of the method for evaluating an emergency plan provided by the present application, and the apparatus, the electronic device, the storage medium, and the program product for evaluating an emergency plan provided by the embodiments of the present application will be specifically explained below.
Fig. 4 is a schematic structural diagram of an evaluation device for an emergency plan according to an embodiment of the present application. As shown in fig. 4, the evaluation apparatus 400 of the emergency plan includes:
the acquiring module 401 is configured to acquire an emergency plan applied to the emergency department made by each emergency department for a target emergency, where each emergency plan includes an emergency theme, a plurality of emergency departments, tasks and resources, the emergency departments include a transverse connection relationship and/or a longitudinal connection relationship, the tasks include independent tasks of the emergency department and cooperation tasks with other emergency departments, and the resources include independent resources of the emergency department and cooperation resources with other emergency departments;
the input module 402 is configured to input an emergency plan into an emergency plan evaluation model to obtain an evaluation result, where the emergency plan evaluation model includes a top-to-bottom theme evaluation layer, a main body evaluation layer, a task evaluation layer, and a resource evaluation layer, determine, through the theme evaluation layer, whether emergency topics included in each emergency plan are consistent, determine, through the main body evaluation layer, whether connection relationships between a plurality of emergency departments included in each emergency plan and a plurality of emergency departments are consistent, determine, through the task evaluation layer, whether independent tasks of each emergency department included in each emergency plan are consistent with cooperation tasks of other emergency departments, and determine, through the resource evaluation layer, whether independent resources of each emergency department included in each emergency plan are consistent with cooperation resources of other emergency departments; when any one of the theme assessment layer, the main body assessment layer, the task assessment layer and the resource assessment layer outputs yes, entering the next assessment layer until the information of each emergency plan is consistent, and ending the assessment; and outputting an evaluation result of the evaluation layer when the output result of any evaluation layer is negative, and ending the evaluation.
Optionally, determining, by the topic evaluation layer, whether the emergency topics contained in each emergency plan are consistent includes: adopting a character recognition algorithm to acquire emergency topics contained in each emergency plan, and determining whether the emergency topics are consistent; if yes, entering a main body evaluation layer; if not, outputting first data used for representing inconsistency of emergency subjects.
Optionally, determining, by the subject evaluation layer, whether the multiple emergency departments included in each emergency plan and the engagement relationships between the multiple emergency departments are consistent includes: acquiring a plurality of emergency departments contained in each emergency plan and connection relations among the emergency departments by adopting an information extraction algorithm; determining whether the connection relations among the emergency departments are consistent or not by adopting a text similarity algorithm; if yes, entering a task evaluation layer; if not, outputting second data used for representing inconsistency of emergency departments.
Optionally, determining, by the subject evaluation layer, whether the multiple emergency departments included in each emergency plan and the engagement relationships between the multiple emergency departments are consistent includes: obtaining standard emergency department architecture information corresponding to an emergency theme; determining whether the connection relation among a plurality of emergency departments contained in each emergency plan is consistent with the standard emergency department architecture information; if yes, entering a task evaluation layer; if not, outputting second data used for representing inconsistency of emergency departments.
Optionally, determining, by the task evaluation layer, whether the independent task of each emergency department and the cooperative task of the other emergency departments included in each emergency plan are consistent includes: an information extraction algorithm is adopted to obtain independent tasks corresponding to each emergency department and collaborative task information of other emergency departments contained in each emergency plan; determining whether independent tasks corresponding to each emergency department are consistent with the cooperation tasks of other emergency departments or not by adopting a text similarity algorithm; if yes, entering a resource evaluation layer; if not, outputting third data for representing inconsistent tasks.
Optionally, determining, by the resource evaluation layer, whether the independent resource of each emergency department and the collaborative resource of other emergency departments contained in each emergency plan are consistent includes: an information extraction algorithm is adopted to obtain independent resources of each emergency department and cooperative resource information of other emergency departments contained in each emergency plan; determining whether independent resources of each emergency department are consistent with cooperative resource information of other emergency departments by adopting a text similarity algorithm; if yes, outputting fourth data used for representing the consistency of the information of each emergency plan, and ending the evaluation; if not, outputting fifth data for representing resource inconsistency.
Optionally, the device 400 for evaluating an emergency plan further includes an adjustment module, where the adjustment module is configured to adjust the emergency plan with inconsistent information according to the evaluation result.
Fig. 5 is a schematic structural diagram of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present application. As shown in fig. 5, the electronic device 500 includes:
a processor 501, a memory 502, a communication interface 503, and a system bus 504.
The memory 502 and the communication interface 503 are connected to the processor 501 through the system bus 504 and complete communication with each other, the memory 502 is used for storing computer executing instructions, the communication interface 503 is used for communicating with other devices, and the processor 501 is used for executing the computer executing instructions to execute the scheme of the evaluation method according to the method embodiment.
In particular, the processor 501 may include one or more processing units, such as: the processor 501 may be a CPU, digital signal processing (Digital Signal Processing, abbreviated as DSP), application specific integrated circuit (Application Specific Integrated Circuit, abbreviated as ASIC), or the like. A general purpose processor may be a microprocessor or the processor may be any conventional processor or the like. The steps of a method disclosed in connection with the present application may be embodied directly in a hardware processor for execution, or in a combination of hardware and software modules in a processor for execution.
Memory 502 may be used to store program instructions. Memory 502 may include a stored program area and a stored data area. The storage program area may store an application program (such as a sound playing function, etc.) required for at least one function of the operating system, and the like. The storage data area may store data created during use of the electronic device 500 (e.g., audio data, etc.), and so on. In addition, the memory 502 may include a high-speed random access memory, and may also include a nonvolatile memory such as at least one magnetic disk storage device, a flash memory device, a universal flash memory (Universal Flash Storage, abbreviated UFS), and the like. The processor 501 performs various functional applications of the electronic device 500 and data processing by executing program instructions stored in the memory 502.
The communication interface 503 may provide a solution for wireless communications, including 2G/3G/4G/16G, as applied to the electronic device 500. The communication interface 503 may receive electromagnetic waves from an antenna, filter, amplify, and the like the received electromagnetic waves, and transmit the electromagnetic waves to a modem processor for demodulation. The communication interface 503 may also amplify the signal modulated by the modem processor, and convert the signal into electromagnetic waves through the antenna to radiate. In some embodiments, at least some of the functional modules of the communication interface 503 may be provided in the processor 501. In some embodiments, at least some of the functional modules of the communication interface 503 may be provided in the same device as at least some of the modules of the processor 501.
The system bus 504 may be a peripheral component interconnect standard (Peripheral Component Interconnect, PCI) bus, or an extended industry standard architecture (Extended Industry Standard Architecture, EISA) bus, among others. The system bus 504 may be divided into an address bus, a data bus, a control bus, and the like. For ease of illustration, the figures are shown with only one bold line, but not with only one bus or one type of bus.
It should be noted that, the number of the memories 502 and the processors 501 is not limited in the embodiments of the present application, and one or more of them may be used, and fig. 5 illustrates one example; the memory 502 and the processor 501 may be connected by wire or wirelessly in a variety of ways, such as via a bus connection. In practice, the electronic device 500 may be a computer or a mobile terminal in various forms. Examples of the computer include a laptop computer, a desktop computer, a workstation, a server, a blade server, and a mainframe computer; mobile terminals are, for example, personal digital assistants, cellular telephones, smart phones, wearable devices, and other similar computing devices.
The electronic device of the present embodiment may be used to execute the technical solution in the foregoing method embodiment, and its implementation principle and technical effects are similar, and are not described herein again.
The embodiment of the application also provides electronic equipment, which comprises: a memory, a processor; a memory for storing program instructions; a processor for invoking program instructions to perform the assessment method as in any of the method embodiments described above.
The embodiment of the application also provides a computer readable storage medium, wherein computer executable instructions are stored in the computer readable storage medium, and the computer executable instructions are used for realizing the evaluation method according to any one of the method embodiments when being executed by a processor.
The embodiment of the application also provides a computer program product, which comprises a computer program; when executed, implements aspects of the evaluation method as in the method embodiments described above.
The foregoing description is only of the preferred embodiments of the present application, and is not intended to limit the scope of the application, but rather is intended to cover any equivalents of the structures or equivalent processes disclosed herein or in the alternative, which may be employed directly or indirectly in other related arts.
Claims (8)
1. A method of evaluating an emergency plan, the method comprising the steps of:
the method comprises the steps that emergency plans, which are made by each emergency department aiming at a target emergency and applied to the emergency department, are obtained, each emergency plan comprises an emergency theme, a plurality of emergency departments, tasks and resources, wherein the emergency departments comprise transverse connection relations and/or longitudinal connection relations, the tasks comprise independent tasks of the emergency department and cooperation tasks with other emergency departments, and the resources comprise independent resources of the emergency department and cooperation resources with other emergency departments;
inputting the emergency plans into an emergency plan evaluation model to obtain an evaluation result, wherein the emergency plan evaluation model comprises a theme evaluation layer, a main body evaluation layer, a task evaluation layer and a resource evaluation layer from top to bottom, determining whether the emergency theme contained in each emergency plan is consistent or not through the theme evaluation layer, determining whether the connection relationship between a plurality of emergency departments contained in each emergency plan and a plurality of emergency departments is consistent or not through the main body evaluation layer, determining whether the independent task of each emergency department contained in each emergency plan is consistent with the cooperation task of other emergency departments through the task evaluation layer, and determining whether the independent resource of each emergency department contained in each emergency plan is consistent with the cooperation resource of other emergency departments through the resource evaluation layer;
When any one of the theme assessment layer, the main body assessment layer, the task assessment layer and the resource assessment layer outputs yes, entering the next assessment layer until the information of each emergency plan is consistent, and ending the assessment; outputting an evaluation result of the evaluation layer when the output result of any evaluation layer is negative, and ending the evaluation;
the determining, by the subject evaluation layer, whether the engagement relationships between the emergency departments and the emergency departments contained in the emergency plans are consistent includes:
acquiring a plurality of emergency departments and connection relations among the emergency departments contained in each emergency plan by adopting an information extraction algorithm;
determining whether the connection relations among the emergency departments are consistent or not by adopting a text similarity algorithm;
if yes, entering a task evaluation layer; if not, outputting second data used for representing inconsistency of emergency departments;
the determining, by the subject evaluation layer, whether the engagement relationships between the emergency departments and the emergency departments contained in the emergency plans are consistent includes:
Obtaining standard emergency department architecture information corresponding to the emergency theme;
determining whether a plurality of emergency departments contained in each emergency plan and connection relations among the emergency departments are consistent with the standard emergency department architecture information;
if yes, entering a task evaluation layer; if not, outputting second data used for representing inconsistency of emergency departments.
2. The method of evaluating according to claim 1, wherein said determining, by said topic evaluation layer, whether said emergency topic contained by each of said emergency plans is consistent comprises:
acquiring the emergency subjects contained in each emergency plan by adopting a character recognition algorithm, and determining whether the emergency subjects are consistent;
if yes, entering the main body evaluation layer; if not, outputting first data used for representing inconsistency of emergency subjects.
3. The method of evaluating according to claim 2, wherein said determining, by said task evaluation layer, whether the independent task of each of said emergency departments and the cooperative task with other emergency departments contained by each of said emergency plans are consistent comprises:
an information extraction algorithm is adopted to obtain independent tasks corresponding to each emergency department and collaborative task information of other emergency departments contained in each emergency plan;
Determining whether the independent task corresponding to each emergency department is consistent with the cooperative task of other emergency departments or not by adopting a text similarity algorithm;
if yes, entering a resource evaluation layer; if not, outputting third data for representing inconsistent tasks.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein said determining, by the resource assessment layer, whether the individual resources of each of the emergency departments and the collaborative resources of other emergency departments contained by the respective emergency plans are consistent comprises:
an information extraction algorithm is adopted to obtain independent resources of each emergency department and cooperative resource information of other emergency departments contained in each emergency plan; determining whether the independent resource of each emergency department is consistent with the cooperative resource information of other emergency departments by adopting a text similarity algorithm;
if yes, outputting fourth data used for representing the consistency of the information of each emergency plan, and ending the evaluation; if not, outputting fifth data for representing resource inconsistency.
5. The assessment method according to claim 1, further comprising:
and according to the evaluation result, adjusting the emergency plan with inconsistent information.
6. An apparatus for evaluating an emergency plan, comprising:
the system comprises an acquisition module, a control module and a control module, wherein the acquisition module is used for acquiring emergency plans which are made by each emergency department aiming at a target emergency and applied to the emergency department, each emergency plan comprises an emergency theme, a plurality of emergency departments, tasks and resources, the emergency departments comprise transverse connection relations and/or longitudinal connection relations, the tasks comprise independent tasks of the emergency department and cooperation tasks with other emergency departments, and the resources comprise independent resources of the emergency department and cooperation resources with other emergency departments;
the system comprises an input module, a resource evaluation layer, a main evaluation layer, a task evaluation layer and a resource evaluation layer, wherein the emergency evaluation module is used for inputting the emergency plan into an emergency plan evaluation model to obtain an evaluation result, the emergency plan evaluation model comprises a theme evaluation layer, a main evaluation layer, a task evaluation layer and a resource evaluation layer from top to bottom, whether the emergency theme contained in each emergency plan is consistent or not is determined by the theme evaluation layer, whether the connection relationship between a plurality of emergency departments contained in each emergency plan and a plurality of emergency departments is consistent or not is determined by the main evaluation layer, whether the independent task of each emergency department contained in each emergency plan is consistent with the cooperation task of other emergency departments or not is determined by the task evaluation layer, and whether the independent resource of each emergency department contained in each emergency plan is consistent with the cooperation resource of other emergency departments is determined by the resource evaluation layer;
When any one of the theme assessment layer, the main body assessment layer, the task assessment layer and the resource assessment layer outputs yes, entering the next assessment layer until the information of each emergency plan is consistent, and ending the assessment; outputting an evaluation result of the evaluation layer when the output result of any evaluation layer is negative, and ending the evaluation;
the determining, by the subject evaluation layer, whether the engagement relationships between the emergency departments and the emergency departments contained in the emergency plans are consistent includes:
acquiring a plurality of emergency departments and connection relations among the emergency departments contained in each emergency plan by adopting an information extraction algorithm;
determining whether the connection relations among the emergency departments are consistent or not by adopting a text similarity algorithm;
if yes, entering a task evaluation layer; if not, outputting second data used for representing inconsistency of emergency departments;
the determining, by the subject evaluation layer, whether the engagement relationships between the emergency departments and the emergency departments contained in the emergency plans are consistent includes:
Obtaining standard emergency department architecture information corresponding to the emergency theme;
determining whether a plurality of emergency departments contained in each emergency plan and connection relations among the emergency departments are consistent with the standard emergency department architecture information;
if yes, entering a task evaluation layer; if not, outputting second data used for representing inconsistency of emergency departments.
7. An electronic device, comprising: a memory, a processor;
the memory is used for storing program instructions;
the processor for invoking the program instructions to perform the assessment method of any of claims 1-5.
8. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that the computer-readable storage medium has stored therein computer-executable instructions, which when executed by a processor are for implementing the evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 5.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202310833868.9A CN116579665B (en) | 2023-07-10 | 2023-07-10 | Emergency plan evaluation method, device and storage medium |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202310833868.9A CN116579665B (en) | 2023-07-10 | 2023-07-10 | Emergency plan evaluation method, device and storage medium |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN116579665A CN116579665A (en) | 2023-08-11 |
| CN116579665B true CN116579665B (en) | 2023-09-19 |
Family
ID=87536183
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202310833868.9A Active CN116579665B (en) | 2023-07-10 | 2023-07-10 | Emergency plan evaluation method, device and storage medium |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN116579665B (en) |
Citations (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110555636A (en) * | 2019-09-19 | 2019-12-10 | 深圳中质安股份有限公司 | Production safety accident scene construction and emergency capacity construction system |
| CN111639845A (en) * | 2020-05-22 | 2020-09-08 | 武汉理工大学 | Emergency plan validity evaluation method considering integrity and operability |
| CN111709636A (en) * | 2020-06-11 | 2020-09-25 | 全球能源互联网研究院有限公司 | Emergency disposal strategy evaluation method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
| CA3063117A1 (en) * | 2018-11-21 | 2020-10-17 | Beijing Yutian Technology Co. Ltd | An emergency resource sharing and exchange system |
| CN115641070A (en) * | 2022-09-16 | 2023-01-24 | 清华大学 | Multi-level multi-department linkage handling method and deduction device for power grid emergency |
| CN116128696A (en) * | 2023-01-10 | 2023-05-16 | 广东远景信息科技有限公司 | Emergency flow detection method, system, electronic equipment and storage medium |
| CN116341789A (en) * | 2022-12-19 | 2023-06-27 | 商飞软件有限公司 | Emergency rescue capability assessment system and assessment method for large airport |
Family Cites Families (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20090164241A1 (en) * | 2007-12-18 | 2009-06-25 | Racioppo Vincent C | Method and system for optimizing primary and emergency health care treatment |
-
2023
- 2023-07-10 CN CN202310833868.9A patent/CN116579665B/en active Active
Patent Citations (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA3063117A1 (en) * | 2018-11-21 | 2020-10-17 | Beijing Yutian Technology Co. Ltd | An emergency resource sharing and exchange system |
| CN110555636A (en) * | 2019-09-19 | 2019-12-10 | 深圳中质安股份有限公司 | Production safety accident scene construction and emergency capacity construction system |
| CN111639845A (en) * | 2020-05-22 | 2020-09-08 | 武汉理工大学 | Emergency plan validity evaluation method considering integrity and operability |
| CN111709636A (en) * | 2020-06-11 | 2020-09-25 | 全球能源互联网研究院有限公司 | Emergency disposal strategy evaluation method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
| CN115641070A (en) * | 2022-09-16 | 2023-01-24 | 清华大学 | Multi-level multi-department linkage handling method and deduction device for power grid emergency |
| CN116341789A (en) * | 2022-12-19 | 2023-06-27 | 商飞软件有限公司 | Emergency rescue capability assessment system and assessment method for large airport |
| CN116128696A (en) * | 2023-01-10 | 2023-05-16 | 广东远景信息科技有限公司 | Emergency flow detection method, system, electronic equipment and storage medium |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| 温鑫.基于机场应用场景的视频监控系统设计与实现.《 科技和产业》.2020,第20卷(第12期),237-241. * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN116579665A (en) | 2023-08-11 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN106570144B (en) | The method and apparatus of recommendation information | |
| CN110275894B (en) | Knowledge graph updating method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| US9607058B1 (en) | Systems and methods for managing documents associated with one or more patent applications | |
| CN102184217B (en) | Emergency plan generating system and method | |
| Lin et al. | Understanding on-site inspection of construction projects based on keyword extraction and topic modeling | |
| US20220005126A1 (en) | Virtual assistant for recommendations on whether to arbitrate claims | |
| CN109241068A (en) | The method, apparatus and terminal device that foreground and background data compares | |
| CN111061679A (en) | Method and system for rapid configuration of technological innovation policy based on rete and drools rules | |
| CN104008107A (en) | Implement method of knowledge base on operation and maintenance management | |
| CN116628211B (en) | Data classification method and device, storage medium and electronic equipment | |
| CN102708143B (en) | Completion is reformed in the tracking of page level | |
| CN116579665B (en) | Emergency plan evaluation method, device and storage medium | |
| CN117291722A (en) | Object management method, related device and computer readable medium | |
| CN110928922A (en) | Public policy analysis model deployment method and system based on big data mining | |
| CN116307040A (en) | Fire rescue technology prediction analysis method based on personalized centrality calculation | |
| WO2023003488A1 (en) | Checking of a document for compliance with personal data requirements | |
| US20220207614A1 (en) | Grants Lifecycle Management System and Method | |
| Maiti | Capturing, Eliciting, and Prioritizing (CEP) Non-Functional Requirements Metadata during the Early Stages of Agile Software Development | |
| CN112767178A (en) | Survival state monitoring method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| Manimegalai et al. | Machine Learning Framework for Analyzing Disaster-Tweets | |
| CN111311197A (en) | Travel data processing method and device | |
| US11170045B2 (en) | Method and system for interactive search indexing | |
| CN113592432B (en) | Work order weight judging method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| US20230274374A1 (en) | Patent family citation landscape tool | |
| Sulaman et al. | Identification of IT incidents for improved risk analysis by using machine learning |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |