CN116050843A - Project supervision security risk assessment method - Google Patents

Project supervision security risk assessment method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN116050843A
CN116050843A CN202310066795.5A CN202310066795A CN116050843A CN 116050843 A CN116050843 A CN 116050843A CN 202310066795 A CN202310066795 A CN 202310066795A CN 116050843 A CN116050843 A CN 116050843A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
project
supervision
security risk
level
scores
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202310066795.5A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
赵雄
陈彤
刘向科
古江林
左永红
符剑桥
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
CHINA COAL XI'AN DESIGN ENGINEERING CO LTD
Original Assignee
CHINA COAL XI'AN DESIGN ENGINEERING CO LTD
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by CHINA COAL XI'AN DESIGN ENGINEERING CO LTD filed Critical CHINA COAL XI'AN DESIGN ENGINEERING CO LTD
Priority to CN202310066795.5A priority Critical patent/CN116050843A/en
Publication of CN116050843A publication Critical patent/CN116050843A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0635—Risk analysis of enterprise or organisation activities
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
    • G06Q10/103—Workflow collaboration or project management
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/08—Construction
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/30—Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a project supervision security risk assessment method, which comprises the steps of determining security risk factors of a project and respectively giving weight scores; scoring each security risk factor; and summing the scores, and grading the risks according to the summation result. According to the project supervision security risk assessment method, the potential security risk factors are identified, analyzed and judged, the corresponding scores are given to the security risk factors according to the influence degree, the quantitative index of the security risk assessment is formed, the project supervision security risk score and the grade thereof are calculated through the quantitative index, a basis is provided for supervision enterprises to accurately manage and control project supervision security risks in a grading manner, so that the project supervision security risk management level and capacity are improved, and the security production is realized.

Description

Project supervision security risk assessment method
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of security risk assessment, and particularly relates to a project supervision security risk assessment method.
Background
At present, the supervision system of construction engineering is an important system in the field of engineering construction in China, and the system plays an important role in guaranteeing the quality and safety of construction engineering and improving the investment benefit and the construction level. However, at present, the engineering construction market order of China is not very standard, engineering accidents frequently occur, and serious consequences are caused by the occurrence of the engineering accidents, so that the supervision engineering master carries corresponding legal responsibility, and losses are caused to supervision enterprises. At present, the quantitative indexes of the safety risk assessment of domestic supervision enterprises and project supervision departments are basically blank, so that the quantitative indexes of the safety risk assessment of the current supervision enterprises and project supervision departments are researched, the safety risks of the supervision enterprises and project supervision departments are correctly assessed, precautionary measures are formulated, and the important effect and practical significance are realized for promoting the enterprise safety grading and accurate management and control.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a project supervision security risk assessment method which is used for reducing engineering accidents by grading security risks of different projects.
The technical scheme adopted by the invention is as follows: the project supervision security risk assessment method comprises the following steps:
step 1, determining safety risk factors of project supervision and respectively giving weight scores;
step 2, scoring each security risk factor obtained in the step 1;
and step 3, summing the scores obtained in the step 2, and carrying out risk classification according to the summation result.
The present invention is also characterized in that,
the safety risk factors of the project supervision in the step 1 comprise the number of field primary safety risks, project management spans, project general supervision grades, general supervision management project numbers and project supervision personnel numbers, and the highest scores are given to the safety risk factors and are weight scores of 15, 10, 45, 15 and 15 in sequence.
The influence factors of the site primary security risk comprise accident occurrence probability, accident occurrence injury frequency, accident occurrence injury number, project engineering property and project site management grade, the highest scores of the influence factors are sequentially given weight scores of 15, 10, 20 and 45, and then each influence factor is respectively scored and summed, and the score of more than 70 is the site primary security risk.
The scoring grade of the accident occurrence probability comprises four grades of no, possible, not frequent occurrence, possible and energy, wherein the scores are 0, 5, 10 and 15 in sequence; the scoring grades of the accident injury frequency comprise four grades of 'occasionally', 'annually', 'monthly', 'daily', and the scores are 0, 5, 8 and 10 in sequence; the scoring grades of the number of the accident injuries comprise four grades of no, "<3," >3 and no more than 10, ">10,", and the scores are 0, 5, 8 and 10 in sequence; the scoring grades of project engineering properties comprise four grades of general engineering, special engineering, dangerous engineering and super-dangerous engineering, wherein the scores are 0, 10, 15 and 20 in sequence; the grading level of the project site management level comprises four grades of grade 1, grade 2, grade 3 and grade 4, and the grading is 0, 15, 30 and 45 in sequence.
The number of primary safety risks in the field include accident categories of object striking, vehicle injury, mechanical injury, lifting injury, electric shock, drowning, burning, fire, overhead falling, collapse, roof caving, water penetration, blasting, gunpowder explosion, gas explosion, boiler explosion, container explosion, other explosions, poisoning and choking or other injuries.
The grading grades of the number of the site primary security risks in the security risk factors in the step 2 comprise four grades of 0, 1, 2 or 3 and 3, and the scores are 0, 5, 10 and 15 in sequence; the scoring grade of the project management span comprises four grades of 'urban', 'urban and extra-urban and intra-provincial', 'extra-provincial and domestic', 'overseas', and the scores are 0, 5, 8 and 10 in sequence; the scoring level of the project director level comprises four levels of level 1, level 2, level 3 and level 4, and the scores are 0, 15, 30 and 45 in sequence; the grading level of the total supervision management item number comprises '1', '2', '3', 'other' four grades, and the grading is 0, 5, 10 and 15 in sequence; the scoring grade of the number of the project supervision personnel comprises four grades of '10 or more', '10 or more and 5 or more', '5 or more and 3 or more', and '3 or more', wherein the scores are 0, 5, 10 and 15 in sequence.
The summation result in the step 3 is below 20 minutes, which is the general attention supervision project of enterprises and is called as a D level; over 20 minutes and below 50 minutes are important concerns for enterprises about supervision projects, called "C" level; over 50 minutes and below 70 minutes are important concerns of enterprises for supervision projects, called "class B"; over 70 points are the special supervision project of the enterprise, which is called "A" level.
The beneficial effects of the invention are as follows: according to the project supervision security risk assessment method, the project supervision potential security risk factors are identified, analyzed and judged, corresponding scores are given according to the influence degree of the security risk factors, quantitative indexes of security risk assessment are formed, the project supervision security risk scores and the levels thereof are calculated through the quantitative indexes, a basis is provided for the classified and accurate management and control of the project supervision security risk of supervision enterprises, so that the project supervision security risk management level and capacity are improved, and security production is realized.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an implementation of the project supervision security risk assessment method of the present invention;
fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of a recognition mode of the number of on-site primary security risks in the project supervision security risk assessment method of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings and detailed description.
The invention provides a project supervision security risk assessment method, as shown in figure 1, by investigating, counting and classifying security risk factors of projects which are subjected to engineering security accidents and are responsible by supervision enterprises in various industries across the country from multiple angles, identifying, analyzing and judging potential security risk factors by using a relevant mathematical statistics tool, wherein the project supervision security risk is related to project security risk factors such as the number of first-level security risks, project management spans, project general supervision levels, the number of general supervision management projects and the number of project supervision personnel, and among the five project security risk factors, different weight scores are given according to different influence degrees of the project security risk factors, as shown in table 1.
Table 1 item proctoring Security risk factor weight score Table
Figure BDA0004062443480000041
In the project supervision site security risk management, the degree of influence of the site primary security risk number on the project security risk is different, and the site primary security risk number comprises four steps of 0, 1, 2 or 3 and 3, and for this purpose, different scores are respectively given according to the site primary security risk number, as shown in table 2.
Table 2 on-site first level security risk quantity score table
Figure BDA0004062443480000042
With respect to the calculation of the number of first-level safety risks in the field, as shown in fig. 2, by classifying and carding the safety risks identified in the project supervision field, the invention refers to the classification standard of the classification of casualties of enterprises (GB 6441-1986), and classifies the accidents into 20 categories, namely, object striking, vehicle injury, mechanical injury, lifting injury, electric shock, drowning, burning, fire, high-altitude falling, collapse, roof falling, water penetration, blasting, gunpowder explosion, gas explosion, boiler explosion, container explosion, other explosions, poisoning and suffocation or other injuries. The site safety risk factors including the probability of accident occurrence, the frequency of injuries caused by accident occurrence, the number of injuries caused by accident occurrence, project engineering properties, the field management level of the project and the like are quantitatively assigned as shown in table 3.
TABLE 3 on-site safety risk factor weight score Table
Figure BDA0004062443480000051
In the project supervision site risk management, the degree of influence on the site safety risk is different from each other with different accident occurrence probabilities including "none", "possible but not frequent", "possible" and "energy" four-way, and for this reason, different scores are assigned to each of the different accident occurrence probabilities, as shown in table 4.
TABLE 4 Accident probability score Table
Figure BDA0004062443480000052
In the project supervision site security risk management, the accident occurrence injury frequency is different, the degree of influence on the site security risk is different, the accident occurrence injury frequency comprises four steps of 'occasional', 'annual', 'monthly', 'daily', and different scores are respectively assigned according to the accident occurrence injury frequency, as shown in table 5.
Table 5 injury frequency score table for accident
Figure BDA0004062443480000053
In project supervision on-site security risk management, the degree of influence of the number of accident injuries on the on-site security risk is different, the number of accident injuries comprises four steps of no, no more than 3, no more than 10 and no more than 10, and different scores are respectively given according to the number of accident injuries, as shown in table 6.
Table 6 injury number score table for accident
Figure BDA0004062443480000054
In the project supervision on-site security risk management, project engineering properties are different, the degree of influence on the on-site security risk is different, and the project engineering properties include four steps of "general engineering", "special engineering" (disaster relief, rescue), "danger big engineering", and "super danger big engineering" (see in detail "dangerous part project safety management regulations" in section 37 in Ministry of construction 2018), for this reason, different scores are respectively given according to the project engineering properties, as shown in table 7.
TABLE 7 engineering Property score Table
Figure BDA0004062443480000061
In the project supervision site security risk management, the degree of influence on the security risk is different in different project site management levels, and the project site management levels include four levels of "level 1", "level 2", "level 3" and "level 4", and for this purpose, different scores are respectively given according to the different project site management levels, as shown in table 8.
Table 8 field management level score table
Figure BDA0004062443480000062
In the project supervision site security risk management, the project site management level includes quantitative assessment of indexes such as the number of full-time security manager, security input (detailed in finance [2022]136 # finance department emergency management department concerning the notification of the printout of enterprise security production cost extraction and use management method), security protection defect rate, security facility defect rate, identification sign defect rate, equipment facility checking maintenance rate, tool checking rate, special operation personnel holding rate, and the like, as shown in table 9.
Table 9 project field management rating criteria table
Figure BDA0004062443480000071
/>
The project supervision site safety risk is calculated according to scores of factors such as the possibility of accident occurrence, the frequency of injuries caused by accident occurrence, the number of injuries caused by accident occurrence, project engineering properties, project site management level and the like, as shown in fig. 2. The accident security risk score is equal to the sum of scores, and the occurrence probability is 'none', which indicates that the security risk does not exist, and the score is 0; a four-level risk score below 20 points, referred to as "IV" (blue); a three-level risk of 20 to 50, called "class iii" (yellow); 50-70 are classified as secondary risk, called "II" (orange), and 70 and more are classified as primary risk, called "I" (red). The project supervision part carries out hierarchical management on supervision sites according to the evaluation result, and simultaneously, counts the number of the site primary security risks of the project supervision sites, and participates in the supervision enterprises to evaluate the project supervision security risks.
In the project supervision security risk management of the supervision enterprises, the project management spans are far and near, the influence degree on the project supervision security risk is different, the project management spans comprise four grades of "in city", "out of city and in province", "out of province and in China" and "abroad", and different scores are respectively given according to the difference of the project management spans, as shown in table 10.
Table 10 project management span score Table
Figure BDA0004062443480000081
For the supervision enterprises, in the project supervision security risk management, the degree of influence of the project general supervision level on the project supervision security risk is also different, and the project general supervision level includes indexes such as academic, age, title, national registration supervision engineer certificate, profession, professional years, similar supervision performance and the like for evaluation, as shown in table 11.
Table 11 general rating Standard Table for items
Figure BDA0004062443480000082
In the project supervision security risk management, the degree of influence on the project supervision security risk is different in different project supervision levels, and the project supervision levels include "level 1", "level 2", "level 3" and "level 4" four levels, and for this purpose, different scores are respectively given, as shown in table 12.
Table 12 item general supervision level score Table
Figure BDA0004062443480000091
In the project supervision security risk management, the degree of influence on the project supervision security risk is also different in different numbers of the general supervision management projects, and the general supervision management projects include "1", "2", "3" and "other" four-way, and therefore, different scores are respectively given according to the different numbers of the general supervision management projects, as shown in table 13.
TABLE 13 general supervision management item quantity score Table
Figure BDA0004062443480000092
In the project supervision security risk management, the number of project supervision personnel is different, the influence degree on the project supervision security risk is also different, and the number of project supervision personnel comprises four steps of more than or equal to 10 people, "<10 people and more than or equal to 5 people," <5 people and more than or equal to 3 people, "<3 people,"; for this purpose, different scores were assigned to the respective numbers of the project manager, as shown in table 14.
Table 14 item supervisor quantity score Table
Figure BDA0004062443480000093
The project supervision security risk score is equal to the sum of scores of the project supervision security risk factors, and the score is below 20, which is the general attention supervision project of enterprises and is called as 'D' level (blue); 20-50 are classified into the class C (yellow) class which is the class of the enterprise and is focused on the supervision project; 50-70 are classified into important care management projects of enterprises, namely "B" class (orange); a particular concern for enterprises is about proctoring items 70 points and above, referred to as "class a" (red).
In the management of the security risks of a monitoring enterprise, the security risks are classified, layered, classified and professionally managed through the results of the security risk assessment of the project supervision, the supervision projects with important and special concerns on the security risks are respectively and effectively managed and controlled in the aspects of management, technology, pre-control and the like according to the security risk characteristics, and the purpose of accurate management and control is achieved.

Claims (7)

1. The project supervision security risk assessment method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step 1, determining safety risk factors of project supervision and respectively giving weight scores;
step 2, scoring each security risk factor obtained in the step 1;
and step 3, summing the scores obtained in the step 2, and carrying out risk classification according to the summation result.
2. The method for evaluating the security risk of project supervision according to claim 1, wherein the security risk factors of the project supervision in the step 1 include the number of first-order security risks in the field, the project management span, the project total supervision level, the total supervision project number, and the project supervision personnel number, and the highest scores are given to the security risk factors in the order of 15, 10, 45, 15, and 15.
3. The project supervision security risk assessment method according to claim 2, wherein the influencing factors of the site primary security risk include probability of accident occurrence, frequency of injury of accident occurrence, number of injury of accident occurrence, project engineering property and project site management level, the influencing factors are given weight scores of 15, 10, 20 and 45 in order of highest score, and then each influencing factor is respectively scored and summed, and the score of more than 70 is the site primary security risk.
4. The method for evaluating the project supervision security risk according to claim 3, wherein the scoring level of the accident occurrence probability comprises "none", "possible, but not frequent", "possible", "capable" four-level, and the scores are 0, 5, 10, 15 in order; the scoring grades of the accident injury frequency comprise four grades of 'occasionally', 'annually', 'monthly', 'daily', and the scores are 0, 5, 8 and 10 in sequence; the scoring grades of the number of the accident injuries comprise four grades of no, "<3," >3 and no more than 10, ">10,", and the scores are 0, 5, 8 and 10 in sequence; the scoring grades of project engineering properties comprise four grades of general engineering, special engineering, dangerous engineering and super-dangerous engineering, wherein the scores are 0, 10, 15 and 20 in sequence; the grading level of the project site management level comprises four grades of grade 1, grade 2, grade 3 and grade 4, and the grading is 0, 15, 30 and 45 in sequence.
5. The project supervision security risk assessment method according to claim 2, wherein the number of site primary security risks includes accident categories of object hit, vehicle injury, mechanical injury, lifting injury, electric shock, drowning, burning, fire, overhead falling, collapse, roof side, water penetration, blasting, gunpowder explosion, gas explosion, boiler explosion, container explosion, other explosion, poisoning and asphyxiation or other injuries.
6. The method for evaluating the project supervision security risk according to claim 5, wherein the scoring level of the number of the site primary security risks in the security risk factors in step 2 includes "0", "1", "2 or 3", "3" four-level, and scores of 0, 5, 10 and 15 in order; the scoring grade of the project management span comprises four grades of 'urban', 'urban and extra-urban and intra-provincial', 'extra-provincial and domestic', 'overseas', and the scores are 0, 5, 8 and 10 in sequence; the scoring level of the project director level comprises four levels of level 1, level 2, level 3 and level 4, and the scores are 0, 15, 30 and 45 in sequence; the grading level of the total supervision management item number comprises '1', '2', '3', 'other' four grades, and the grading is 0, 5, 10 and 15 in sequence; the scoring grade of the number of the project supervision personnel comprises four grades of '10 or more', '10 or more and 5 or more', '5 or more and 3 or more', and '3 or more', wherein the scores are 0, 5, 10 and 15 in sequence.
7. The method for evaluating the project supervision security risk according to claim 6, wherein the summation result in the step 3 is below 20 minutes, which is called "D" level, for the enterprise to generally pay attention to the supervision project; over 20 minutes and below 50 minutes are important concerns for enterprises about supervision projects, called "C" level; over 50 minutes and below 70 minutes are important concerns of enterprises for supervision projects, called "class B"; over 70 points are the special supervision project of the enterprise, which is called "A" level.
CN202310066795.5A 2023-01-16 2023-01-16 Project supervision security risk assessment method Pending CN116050843A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202310066795.5A CN116050843A (en) 2023-01-16 2023-01-16 Project supervision security risk assessment method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202310066795.5A CN116050843A (en) 2023-01-16 2023-01-16 Project supervision security risk assessment method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN116050843A true CN116050843A (en) 2023-05-02

Family

ID=86119855

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202310066795.5A Pending CN116050843A (en) 2023-01-16 2023-01-16 Project supervision security risk assessment method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN116050843A (en)

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN111414581B (en) Improved LEC risk hidden danger based dual prevention system construction method
Zeng et al. Integrating safety, environmental and quality risks for project management using a FMEA method
CN113689129B (en) Comprehensive safety supervision information platform system based on risk classification and classified supervision
CN111985819B (en) Industrial dust explosion risk evaluation method
CN109947806B (en) Case-based reasoning ultrahigh-rise construction safety accident emergency auxiliary decision-making method
CN106156957A (en) A kind of business risk appraisal procedure based on weight and system
CN114282839A (en) Mountain region highway construction safety risk management system
CN110059949A (en) A kind of aluminium powder risk of explosion appraisal procedure based on catastrophe theory
CN113515720B (en) Method for identifying and evaluating major safety risk of dangerous chemical enterprise
CN116629607A (en) Dangerous waste environment safety risk identification and assessment method
CN112686570A (en) Intelligent security risk management and control system
CN114926028A (en) Tunnel fire risk assessment method
CN111626640A (en) Coal mine safety comprehensive risk evaluation method and system based on neutral reference object
CN115796569A (en) Safety risk grading monitoring platform for building construction enterprises
CN113505341A (en) Method and device for evaluating subway safety risk and emergency capacity based on situation construction
CN113723817A (en) Enterprise dust explosion risk assessment method, device and equipment
CN116050843A (en) Project supervision security risk assessment method
CN113657788A (en) Enterprise safety production standardization intelligent supervision system and method
CN115759864A (en) Engineering supervision system based on quality safety detection
CN115936293A (en) Subway construction safety accident risk evaluation method based on PCA
CN114511155A (en) Multi-scale correlation fusion food safety risk prediction and early warning method
CN113408844A (en) Safety diagnosis and evaluation method based on accident guidance
CN116307702A (en) Safety risk evaluation method for LNG receiving station engineering construction
CN116822941B (en) Intelligent safety management system based on new energy workstation
Li et al. Classified Management and Control of Construction Safety Production Risks

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination