CN115689071A - Equipment fault fusion prediction method and system based on correlation parameter mining - Google Patents

Equipment fault fusion prediction method and system based on correlation parameter mining Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN115689071A
CN115689071A CN202310001115.1A CN202310001115A CN115689071A CN 115689071 A CN115689071 A CN 115689071A CN 202310001115 A CN202310001115 A CN 202310001115A CN 115689071 A CN115689071 A CN 115689071A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
fault
equipment
prediction result
prediction
current time
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN202310001115.1A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN115689071B (en
Inventor
孙佑春
陈宏兵
俞阳
戴永娟
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Zhenjiang Anhua Electric Group Co ltd
Original Assignee
Nanjing University Of Technology Jinhong Energy Technology Co ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nanjing University Of Technology Jinhong Energy Technology Co ltd filed Critical Nanjing University Of Technology Jinhong Energy Technology Co ltd
Priority to CN202310001115.1A priority Critical patent/CN115689071B/en
Publication of CN115689071A publication Critical patent/CN115689071A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN115689071B publication Critical patent/CN115689071B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses an equipment fault fusion prediction method and system based on correlation parameter mining, which specifically comprises the following steps: collecting historical operating parameters and time sequence data of equipment; performing sequence normalization on each fault data based on the time sequence data to obtain a fault event sequence set; constructing a correlation bipartite graph of the operation parameters and the fault events based on the fault event sequence set; for the operation parameters at the current time, predicting the abnormal working conditions of the equipment according to the relevance bipartite graph, and taking the prediction as a first prediction result; obtaining a second prediction of the fault by another method step; and effectively fusing the first prediction result and the second prediction result to obtain a final equipment failure prediction result. The method takes the relevance of the operation parameters and the relevance of the time sequence into consideration, and can obtain more complete equipment abnormal information and more accurate prediction results in advance, so that the fault prediction method can achieve the aims of rapidness and high efficiency.

Description

Equipment fault fusion prediction method and system based on correlation parameter mining
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of reliability maintenance engineering, in particular to an equipment fault fusion prediction method and system based on correlation parameter mining.
Background
Most of the traditional industrial equipment fault early warning methods are that a fault prediction model is trained based on a data set, and then relevant data is input into the trained prediction model to output a fault prediction result, for example, CN115186904A (China, published date: 20221014) discloses a method and a device for predicting the fault of industrial equipment based on a Transformer, which is realized by acquiring a time sequence data set corresponding to the health state of target industrial equipment; inputting the time sequence data set into a trained fault prediction model, and outputting a fault prediction value of the time sequence data set, wherein the fault prediction model is obtained on the basis of training of a training sample carrying a fault prediction value label; and when the failure prediction value is larger than the failure threshold value, judging that the target industrial equipment fails, otherwise, judging that the target industrial equipment normally operates. Although the conventional fault prediction method is convenient and simple to apply, the operation state of the equipment is not fixed and unchanged in the operation process of the industrial equipment, and the traditional prediction method is not high enough in accuracy along with the increase of data updating and cannot meet the prediction accuracy requirement under the complex industrial environment.
Disclosure of Invention
Aiming at the defects in the prior art, the invention aims to provide an equipment fault fusion prediction method and system based on associated parameter mining, aiming at the defects of low prediction efficiency, low accuracy and low real-time performance of the traditional industrial equipment fault prediction technology. The first prediction result obtained by the bipartite graph and the second prediction result obtained by an alternative method are effectively fused to obtain a final equipment fault prediction result, so that the fault prediction result can achieve the aims of rapidness, high efficiency and high accuracy.
The technical scheme is as follows: in order to realize the purpose of the invention, the invention adopts the following technical scheme: a device fault fusion prediction method based on correlation parameter mining comprises the following steps:
s1, collecting historical operating parameters and time sequence data of equipment;
s2, performing sequence normalization on each fault data based on the time sequence data to obtain a fault event sequence set;
s3, constructing a correlation bipartite graph of the operation parameters and the fault events based on the fault event sequence set; the nodes in the relevance bipartite graph comprise fault object nodes and operation parameter characteristic nodes, and connecting edges between the fault object nodes and the operation parameter characteristic nodes represent that relevance relations exist between the fault object nodes and the operation parameter characteristic nodes;
s4, predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment according to the relevance bipartite graph for the operation parameters at the current time, and taking the prediction as a first prediction result;
s5, carrying out piecewise linearization vector representation on the time sequence data according to a fixed time distance: x K ={x 1 ,x 2 ,…, x K-1 , x K }; k is the total number of time series segments, K =1,2. x is the number of 1 The operating parameter characteristic of the first time sequence section; x is a radical of a fluorine atom 2 Characterizing the operating parameters of the second time series segment; x is a radical of a fluorine atom k-1 The operation parameter characteristics of the kth-1 time sequence section; x is a radical of a fluorine atom k The operation parameter characteristic of the kth time sequence section;
s6, assuming that the ith time sequence section is in a fault-free state, and the corresponding operation parameter characteristic is x i (ii) a Supposing that the jth time sequence segment is in a fault state, the corresponding operating parameter characteristic is x j
S7, calculating the operation parameter x of the current time a a And x i Characteristic distance D1:
Figure 869381DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
wherein
Figure 503624DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
Is a correction factor;
s8, calculating the operation parameter x of the current time a a And x j Characteristic distance D2:
Figure 7418DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
Figure 755360DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
a 2-norm representing a vector;
s9, integrating the value ranges of the D1 and the D2, predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment, and taking the abnormal working condition as a second prediction result;
and S10, effectively fusing the first prediction result and the second prediction result to obtain a final equipment failure prediction result.
Further, in S9, the value ranges of D1 and D2 are integrated, the abnormal operating condition of the device is predicted, and as a second prediction result, the method specifically includes:
operating parameter x for the current time a a And x i Characteristic distance between, setting a threshold
Figure 53618DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
Operating parameter x for the current time a a And x j Characteristic distance between, setting a threshold
Figure 424425DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
When D1 is less than
Figure 466330DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
And D2 is greater than
Figure 45341DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
If so, indicating that the equipment at the current time has no fault;
when D1 is greater than
Figure 576817DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
And D2 is less than
Figure 857757DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
If so, indicating that the equipment at the current time is faulty;
when D1 is greater than
Figure 14937DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
And D2 is greater than
Figure 697723DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
If so, indicating the possibility of failure of the equipment at the current time;
when D1 is less than
Figure 354094DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
And D2 is less than
Figure 919068DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
And then indicating the possibility of the fault of the equipment at the current time.
Further, the step S10 of effectively fusing the first prediction result and the second prediction result to obtain a final device failure prediction result includes that the first prediction result and the second prediction result are fused by a decision-level model obtained by a machine learning method to obtain the final device failure prediction result.
Further, the decision-level model obtained by the machine learning method is obtained by pre-training, and specifically includes:
taking fault data related to equipment history as training data to carry out data preprocessing to form a training set and a test set;
training the decision-level model using the training set;
testing the decision-level model using the test set;
and updating the model parameters of the decision-making model according to the test result, and obtaining the decision-making model through iterative training.
Based on the same inventive concept, the invention discloses an equipment fault fusion prediction system based on correlation parameter mining, which comprises:
the acquisition module is used for acquiring historical operating parameters and time sequence data of the equipment;
the sorting module is used for sorting the sequence of each fault data based on the time sequence data to obtain a fault event sequence set;
the construction module is used for constructing a correlation bipartite graph of the operation parameters and the fault events based on the fault event sequence set; the nodes in the relevance bipartite graph comprise fault object nodes and operation parameter characteristic nodes, and connecting edges between the fault object nodes and the operation parameter characteristic nodes represent that relevance relations exist between the fault object nodes and the operation parameter characteristic nodes;
the prediction module 1 is used for predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment according to the relevance bipartite graph for the operation parameters at the current time and taking the prediction as a first prediction result;
the segmentation module is used for carrying out segmented linearization vector representation on the time sequence data according to a fixed time distance: x K ={x 1 ,x 2 ,…, x K-1 , x K }; k is the total number of time series segments, K =1,2. x is the number of 1 Characterizing the operating parameters of the first time sequence segment; x is a radical of a fluorine atom 2 Characterizing the operating parameters of the second time series segment; x is the number of k-1 The operation parameter characteristics of the kth-1 time sequence section; x is the number of k The operation parameter characteristic of the kth time sequence section;
assuming that the ith time sequence segment is in a fault-free state, the corresponding operation parameter characteristic is x i (ii) a Supposing that the jth time sequence segment is in a fault state, the corresponding operating parameter characteristic is x j
A calculation module 1 for calculating an operating parameter x at a current time a a And x i Characteristic distance D1 between:
Figure 99513DEST_PATH_IMAGE009
wherein
Figure 151652DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
Is a correction factor;
a calculation module 2 for calculating the operation parameter x of the current time a a And x j Characteristic distance D2:
Figure 228192DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
Figure 546041DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
a 2-norm representing a vector;
the prediction module 2 is used for integrating the value ranges of the D1 and the D2, predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment and taking the abnormal working condition as a second prediction result;
and the fusion prediction module is used for effectively fusing the first prediction result and the second prediction result to obtain a final equipment failure prediction result.
Further, the value ranges of D1 and D2 are integrated, the abnormal operating condition of the device is predicted, and as a second prediction result, the method specifically includes:
operating parameter x for the current time a a And x i Characteristic distance between, setting a threshold
Figure 218593DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
Operating parameter x for the current time a a And x j Characteristic distance between, setting a threshold
Figure 938287DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
When D1 is less than
Figure 169418DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
And D2 is greater than
Figure 974562DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
If so, indicating that the equipment at the current time has no fault;
when D1 is greater than
Figure 700073DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
And D2 is less than
Figure 228269DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
If so, indicating that the equipment at the current time is faulty;
when D1 is greater than
Figure 443349DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
And D2 is greater than
Figure 922741DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
If so, indicating the possibility of failure of the equipment at the current time;
when D1 is less than
Figure 451942DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
And D2 is less than
Figure 615071DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
And then, the possibility that the equipment at the current time is in failure is indicated.
And further, effectively fusing the first prediction result and the second prediction result to obtain a final equipment fault prediction result.
Further, the decision-level model obtained by the machine learning method is obtained by pre-training, and specifically includes:
the preprocessing module is used for preprocessing data by taking fault data related to equipment history as training data to form a training set and a test set;
a training module for training the decision-level model using the training set;
a test module for testing the decision-level model using the test set;
and the iterative training module is used for updating the model parameters of the decision-making model according to the test result and obtaining the decision-making model through iterative training.
Has the advantages that:
1. the equipment fault fusion prediction method based on the correlation parameter mining can be used for equipment fault prediction under complex industrial conditions. Specifically, S1, collecting historical operating parameters and time sequence data of equipment; s2, performing sequence normalization on each fault data based on the time sequence data to obtain a fault event sequence set; s3, constructing a correlation bipartite graph of the operation parameters and the fault events based on the fault event sequence set; s4, predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment according to the relevance bipartite graph for the operation parameters at the current time, and taking the prediction as a first prediction result; s5, carrying out piecewise linearization vector representation on the time sequence data according to a fixed time distance; s6, supposing that the ith time sequence segment is no reasonThe barrier state and the corresponding operating parameter characteristic are x i (ii) a Supposing that the jth time sequence segment is in a fault state, the corresponding operating parameter characteristic is x j (ii) a S7, calculating the operation parameter x of the current time a a And x i A characteristic distance D1 therebetween; s8, calculating the operation parameter x of the current time a a And x j A characteristic distance D2 therebetween; s9, integrating the value ranges of the D1 and the D2, predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment, and taking the abnormal working condition as a second prediction result; and S10, effectively fusing the first prediction result and the second prediction result to obtain a final equipment failure prediction result. The method provided by the invention takes the relevance of the operation parameters and the relevance of the time sequence into consideration, and can obtain more complete equipment abnormal information and more advanced prediction results; innovatively providing a relevance bipartite graph for constructing operation parameters and fault events, converting a fault prediction problem into a bipartite graph prediction problem, realizing fault prediction by using the advantages of the bipartite graph, and effectively fusing a first prediction result and a second prediction result obtained by the bipartite graph to obtain a final equipment fault prediction result; therefore, the fault prediction method can achieve the aims of high speed and high efficiency.
2. According to the invention, the characteristic distance between the current time operation parameter and the operation parameter characteristic in the two pre-assumed fault states is calculated, and the two characteristic distances are comprehensively compared to obtain a second prediction result, so that the fault prediction is realized, and the fault prediction accuracy is greatly improved.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart illustrating the implementation of the steps of the method of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The present application will be described in further detail with reference to the drawings and examples. It is to be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the relevant invention and not restrictive of the invention. It should be noted that, for convenience of description, only the portions related to the present invention are shown in the drawings.
The industrial equipment applied by the invention is particularly an intelligent comprehensive energy-saving cabinet (intelligent voltage optimization device), which integrates a three-phase magnetic balance technology and a compensation type voltage regulation and stabilization technology, adopts a novel green environment-friendly energy-saving technology system designed for reducing the failure rate of the equipment, prolonging the service life of the equipment and saving the electric charge expenditure of users on the basis of optimizing the working voltage of the equipment by combining a Z-shaped isolation compensation transformer with an iron core and a multi-winding special wiring with a column type voltage regulation transformer. The normal use conditions of the intelligent voltage optimization device are as follows: (1) ambient temperature: -15 ℃ to 40 ℃; (2) altitude: not more than 1000 meters; note: when the altitude exceeds 1000 meters, the load capacity of the regulated power supply will decrease as the altitude increases. (3) relative humidity: less than or equal to 90 percent; (4) The installation place has no gas, steam, chemical deposition, dust, dirt and other explosive and corrosive media which seriously affect the insulation strength of the voltage-stabilized power supply; (5) the installation site should not have severe vibration or jolt. The intelligent comprehensive energy-saving cabinet (intelligent voltage optimization device) can predict and alarm abnormal conditions such as undervoltage, overload, overcurrent and overtemperature in time, and has important effect on the safety and reliability of the intelligent comprehensive energy-saving cabinet.
As shown in fig. 1, the present embodiment provides an apparatus failure fusion prediction method based on correlation parameter mining, which includes the following steps:
s1, collecting historical operating parameters and time sequence data of equipment;
specifically, historical operating parameters and corresponding time sequence data of the digital intelligent comprehensive energy-saving cabinet (intelligent voltage optimization device) are collected; the operating parameters include: input voltage, output voltage, working current, operation temperature, load condition and other data related to the operation of the equipment.
S2, performing sequence normalization on each fault data based on the time sequence data to obtain a fault event sequence set;
specifically, fault data is integrated according to the time sequence data to form a fault event sequence set.
S3, constructing a correlation bipartite graph of the operation parameters and the fault events based on the fault event sequence set; the nodes in the relevance bipartite graph comprise fault object nodes and operation parameter characteristic nodes, and connecting edges between the fault object nodes and the operation parameter characteristic nodes represent that relevance relations exist between the fault object nodes and the operation parameter characteristic nodes;
s4, predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment according to the relevance bipartite graph for the operation parameters at the current time, and taking the prediction as a first prediction result;
s5, carrying out piecewise linearization vector representation on the time sequence data according to a fixed time distance: x K ={x 1 ,x 2 ,…, x K-1 , x K }; k is the total number of time series segments, K =1,2. x is the number of 1 Characterizing the operating parameters of the first time sequence segment; x is the number of 2 Characterizing the operating parameters of the second time series segment; x is the number of k-1 The operation parameter characteristics of the k-1 time sequence segment are obtained; x is the number of k The operation parameter characteristics of the kth time sequence section;
specifically, for example, if the time series data relates to data of 1 month, the time series may be divided into segments at intervals meeting the demand, such as every half minute, every 1 minute, or every 1 hour;
if the time series data relates to data of 1 whole year, the time series can be divided into time series sections according to the time interval meeting the requirement, such as every 1 minute, every 1 hour, or every 1 day.
S6, assuming that the ith time sequence section is in a fault-free state, and the corresponding operation parameter characteristic is x i (ii) a Supposing that the jth time sequence segment is in a fault state, the corresponding operating parameter characteristic is x j
S7, calculating the operation parameter x of the current time a a And x i Characteristic distance D1 between:
Figure 955047DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
in which
Figure 734784DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
Is a correction factor;
s8, calculating the operation parameter x of the current time a a And x j Characteristic distance D2:
Figure 316944DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
Figure 334579DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
a 2-norm representing a vector;
s9, integrating the value ranges of the D1 and the D2, predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment, and taking the abnormal working condition as a second prediction result;
and S10, effectively fusing the first prediction result and the second prediction result to obtain a final equipment failure prediction result.
Specifically, in S9, the value ranges of D1 and D2 are integrated, the abnormal operating condition of the device is predicted, and the method specifically includes, as a second prediction result:
operating parameter x for the current time a a And x i Characteristic distance between, setting a threshold
Figure 314299DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
Operating parameter x for the current time a a And x j Characteristic distance between, setting a threshold
Figure 50173DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
When D1 is less than
Figure 717915DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
And D2 is greater than
Figure 573744DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
If so, indicating that the equipment at the current time has no fault;
when D1 is greater than
Figure 504791DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
And D2 is less than
Figure 681957DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
If so, indicating that the equipment at the current time is faulty;
when D1 is greater than
Figure 418969DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
And D2 is greater than
Figure 614458DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
If so, indicating the possibility of failure of the equipment at the current time;
when D1 is less than
Figure 762411DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
And D2 is less than
Figure 676141DEST_PATH_IMAGE010
And then indicating the possibility of the fault of the equipment at the current time.
Specifically, the S10 effectively fuses the first prediction result and the second prediction result to obtain a final equipment failure prediction result, and specifically includes that the first prediction result and the second prediction result are fused through a decision-level model obtained through a machine learning method to obtain the final equipment failure prediction result.
Specifically, the decision-level model obtained by the machine learning method is obtained by pre-training, and specifically includes:
taking fault data related to equipment history as training data to carry out data preprocessing to form a training set and a test set; the sample data ratio of the training set and the test set is 4:1.
Training the decision-level model using the training set;
testing the decision-level model using the test set;
and updating the model parameters of the decision-making model according to the test result, and obtaining the decision-making model through iterative training.
Specifically, a training set is input into a decision-level model for machine learning, and a fault prediction model is obtained preliminarily; and inputting the test set into the preliminarily obtained prediction model, and finally performing parameter adjustment on the model according to the test accuracy so as to obtain the optimal decision-level model.
Based on the same inventive concept, the equipment fault fusion prediction system based on the correlation parameter mining disclosed by the embodiment comprises:
the acquisition module is used for acquiring historical operating parameters and time sequence data of the equipment;
specifically, historical operating parameters and corresponding time sequence data of the digital intelligent comprehensive energy-saving cabinet (intelligent voltage optimization device) are collected; the operating parameters include: input voltage, output voltage, working current, operation temperature, load condition and other data related to the operation of the equipment.
The sorting module is used for sorting the sequence of each fault data based on the time sequence data to obtain a fault event sequence set;
specifically, fault data is integrated according to the time sequence data to form a fault event sequence set.
The construction module is used for constructing a correlation bipartite graph of the operation parameters and the fault events based on the fault event sequence set; the nodes in the relevance bipartite graph comprise fault object nodes and operation parameter characteristic nodes, and connecting edges between the fault object nodes and the operation parameter characteristic nodes represent that relevance relations exist between the fault object nodes and the operation parameter characteristic nodes;
the prediction module 1 is used for predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment according to the relevance bipartite graph for the operation parameters at the current time and taking the prediction as a first prediction result;
the segmentation module is used for carrying out segmented linearization vector representation on the time sequence data according to a fixed time distance: x K ={x 1 ,x 2 ,…, x K-1 , x K }; k is the total number of time series segments, K =1,2. x is the number of 1 Characterizing the operating parameters of the first time sequence segment; x is the number of 2 Characterizing the operating parameters of the second time series segment; x is the number of k-1 The operation parameter characteristics of the kth-1 time sequence section; x is the number of k The operation parameter characteristic of the kth time sequence section;
specifically, for example, if the time series data relates to data of 1 month, the time series may be divided into segments at intervals meeting the demand, such as every half minute, every 1 minute, or every 1 hour;
if the time series data relates to data of 1 whole year, the time series can be divided into time series sections according to the time interval meeting the requirement, such as every 1 minute, every 1 hour, or every 1 day.
Specifically, assuming that the ith time sequence segment is in a fault-free state, the corresponding operating parameter characteristic is x i (ii) a Supposing that the jth time sequence segment is in a fault state, the corresponding operating parameter characteristic is x j
A calculation module 1 for calculating an operating parameter x of the current time a a And x i Characteristic distance D1:
Figure 951264DEST_PATH_IMAGE011
wherein
Figure 17572DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
Is a correction factor;
a calculation module 2 for calculating the operation parameter x of the current time a a And x j Characteristic distance D2:
Figure 290421DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
Figure 737452DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
a 2-norm representing a vector;
the prediction module 2 is used for integrating the value ranges of the D1 and the D2, predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment and taking the abnormal working condition as a second prediction result;
and the fusion prediction module is used for effectively fusing the first prediction result and the second prediction result to obtain a final equipment failure prediction result.
Specifically, the value ranges of D1 and D2 are integrated, the abnormal operating condition of the device is predicted, and as a second prediction result, the method specifically includes:
operating parameter x for the current time a a And x i Characteristic distance between, setting a threshold
Figure 753949DEST_PATH_IMAGE012
Operating parameter x for the current time a a And x j BetweenSet a threshold value
Figure 986348DEST_PATH_IMAGE010
When D1 is less than
Figure 915252DEST_PATH_IMAGE012
And D2 is greater than
Figure 69152DEST_PATH_IMAGE010
If so, indicating that the equipment at the current time has no fault;
when D1 is greater than
Figure 138608DEST_PATH_IMAGE012
And D2 is less than
Figure 225513DEST_PATH_IMAGE010
If so, indicating that the equipment at the current time is faulty;
when D1 is greater than
Figure 590898DEST_PATH_IMAGE012
And D2 is greater than
Figure 700936DEST_PATH_IMAGE010
If so, indicating the possibility of failure of the equipment at the current time;
when D1 is less than
Figure 574083DEST_PATH_IMAGE012
And D2 is less than
Figure 718757DEST_PATH_IMAGE010
And then, the possibility that the equipment at the current time is in failure is indicated.
Specifically, the method comprises the step of effectively fusing a first prediction result and a second prediction result to obtain a final equipment fault prediction result, and specifically comprises the step of fusing the first prediction result and the second prediction result through a decision-level model obtained by a machine learning method to obtain the final equipment fault prediction result.
Specifically, the decision-level model obtained by the machine learning method is obtained by pre-training, and specifically includes:
the preprocessing module is used for preprocessing data by taking fault data related to equipment history as training data to form a training set and a test set; the sample data ratio of the training set and the test set is 4:1.
A training module for training the decision-level model using the training set;
a test module for testing the decision-level model using the test set;
and the iterative training module is used for updating the model parameters of the decision-making model according to the test result and obtaining the decision-making model through iterative training.
Specifically, a training set is input into a decision-level model for machine learning, and a fault prediction model is obtained preliminarily; and inputting the test set into the preliminarily obtained prediction model, and finally performing parameter adjustment on the model according to the test accuracy so as to obtain the optimal decision-level model.

Claims (8)

1. A device fault fusion prediction method based on correlation parameter mining is characterized by comprising the following steps:
s1, collecting historical operating parameters and time sequence data of equipment;
s2, performing sequence normalization on each fault data based on the time sequence data to obtain a fault event sequence set;
s3, constructing a correlation bipartite graph of the operation parameters and the fault events based on the fault event sequence set; the nodes in the relevance bipartite graph comprise fault object nodes and operation parameter characteristic nodes, and connecting edges between the fault object nodes and the operation parameter characteristic nodes represent that relevance relations exist between the fault object nodes and the operation parameter characteristic nodes;
s4, predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment according to the relevance bipartite graph for the operation parameters at the current time, and taking the prediction as a first prediction result;
s5, carrying out piecewise linearization vector representation on the time sequence data according to the fixed time distance: x K ={x 1 ,x 2 ,…, x K-1 , x K }; k is the total number of time sequence segments, K =1,2, · K; x is the number of 1 Characterizing the operating parameters of the first time sequence segment; x is the number of 2 Characterizing the operating parameters of the second time series segment; x is the number of k-1 The operation parameter characteristics of the kth-1 time sequence section; x is the number of k The operation parameter characteristics of the kth time sequence section;
s6, assuming that the ith time sequence section is in a fault-free state, and the corresponding operation parameter characteristic is x i (ii) a Supposing that the jth time sequence segment is in a fault state, the corresponding operating parameter characteristic is x j
S7, calculating the operation parameter x of the current time a a And x i Characteristic distance D1 between:
Figure 882504DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
in which
Figure 574516DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
Is a correction factor;
s8, calculating the operation parameter x of the current time a a And x j Characteristic distance D2:
Figure 999943DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
Figure 195433DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
a 2-norm representing a vector;
s9, integrating the value ranges of the D1 and the D2, predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment, and taking the abnormal working condition as a second prediction result;
and S10, effectively fusing the first prediction result and the second prediction result to obtain a final equipment failure prediction result.
2. The method for predicting the equipment fault fusion based on the association parameter mining according to claim 1, wherein the step S9 is to synthesize the value ranges of D1 and D2, predict the abnormal working condition of the equipment, and as a second prediction result, specifically include:
operating parameter x for the current time a a And x i Characteristic distance between, setting a threshold
Figure 359698DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
Operating parameter x for the current time a a And x j Characteristic distance between, setting a threshold
Figure 257115DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
When D1 is less than
Figure 532239DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
And D2 is greater than
Figure 864125DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
If so, indicating that the equipment at the current time has no fault;
when D1 is greater than
Figure 871396DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
And D2 is less than
Figure 334738DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
If so, indicating that the equipment at the current time is faulty;
when D1 is greater than
Figure 334924DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
And D2 is greater than
Figure 567322DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
If so, indicating the possibility of failure of the equipment at the current time;
when D1 is less than
Figure 496226DEST_PATH_IMAGE009
And D2 is less than
Figure 446865DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
And then, the possibility that the equipment at the current time is in failure is indicated.
3. The equipment fault fusion prediction method based on correlation parameter mining as claimed in claim 1, wherein S10, the first prediction result and the second prediction result are effectively fused to obtain a final equipment fault prediction result, and the method specifically comprises the step of fusing the first prediction result and the second prediction result through a decision-level model obtained by a machine learning method to obtain the final equipment fault prediction result.
4. The method for predicting the equipment failure fusion based on the correlation parameter mining as claimed in claim 3, wherein the decision-level model obtained by the machine learning method is obtained by pre-training, and specifically comprises:
taking fault data related to equipment history as training data to carry out data preprocessing to form a training set and a test set;
training the decision-level model using the training set;
testing the decision-level model using the test set;
and updating the model parameters of the decision-making model according to the test result, and obtaining the decision-making model through iterative training.
5. An equipment fault fusion prediction system based on correlation parameter mining is characterized by comprising:
the acquisition module is used for acquiring historical operating parameters and time sequence data of the equipment;
the sorting module is used for sorting the sequence of each fault data based on the time sequence data to obtain a fault event sequence set;
the construction module is used for constructing a correlation bipartite graph of the operation parameters and the fault events based on the fault event sequence set; the nodes in the relevance bipartite graph comprise fault object nodes and operation parameter characteristic nodes, and connecting edges between the fault object nodes and the operation parameter characteristic nodes represent that relevance relations exist between the fault object nodes and the operation parameter characteristic nodes;
the prediction module 1 is used for predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment according to the relevance bipartite graph for the operation parameters at the current time and taking the prediction as a first prediction result;
the segmentation module is used for carrying out segmented linearization vector representation on the time sequence data according to a fixed time distance: x K ={x 1 ,x 2 ,…, x K-1 , x K }; k is the total number of time series segments, K =1,2. x is the number of 1 Characterizing the operating parameters of the first time sequence segment; x is a radical of a fluorine atom 2 Characterizing the operating parameters of the second time series segment; x is the number of k-1 The operation parameter characteristics of the kth-1 time sequence section; x is the number of k The operation parameter characteristic of the kth time sequence section;
assuming that the ith time sequence segment is in a fault-free state, the corresponding operation parameter characteristic is x i (ii) a Supposing that the jth time sequence segment is in a fault state, the corresponding operating parameter characteristic is x j
A calculation module 1 for calculating an operating parameter x of the current time a a And x i Characteristic distance D1 between:
Figure 267053DEST_PATH_IMAGE010
in which
Figure 540909DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
Is a correction factor;
a calculation module 2 for calculating the operation parameter x of the current time a a And x j Characteristic distance D2:
Figure 217878DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
Figure 78648DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
a 2-norm representing a vector;
the prediction module 2 is used for integrating the value ranges of the D1 and the D2, predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment and taking the abnormal working condition as a second prediction result;
and the fusion prediction module is used for effectively fusing the first prediction result and the second prediction result to obtain a final equipment failure prediction result.
6. The system according to claim 5, wherein the value ranges of D1 and D2 are integrated to predict the abnormal working condition of the device, and the system, as a second prediction result, specifically comprises:
operating parameter x for the current time a a And x i Characteristic distance between, setting a threshold
Figure 233686DEST_PATH_IMAGE009
Operating parameter x for the current time a a And x j Characteristic distance between, setting a threshold
Figure 378360DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
When D1 is less than
Figure 413181DEST_PATH_IMAGE009
And D2 is greater than
Figure 276094DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
If so, indicating that the equipment at the current time has no fault;
when D1 is greater than
Figure 985556DEST_PATH_IMAGE009
And D2 is less than
Figure 984736DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
If yes, indicating that the equipment at the current time is in fault;
when D1 is greater than
Figure 3507DEST_PATH_IMAGE009
And D2 is greater than
Figure 337406DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
If yes, indicating the possibility of failure of the equipment at the current time;
when D1 is less than
Figure 834246DEST_PATH_IMAGE009
And D2 is less than
Figure 727682DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
And then, the possibility that the equipment at the current time is in failure is indicated.
7. The equipment fault fusion prediction system based on correlation parameter mining as claimed in claim 5, wherein the first prediction result and the second prediction result are effectively fused to obtain a final equipment fault prediction result, and the method specifically comprises the step of fusing the first prediction result and the second prediction result through a decision-level model obtained by a machine learning method to obtain the final equipment fault prediction result.
8. The system according to claim 7, wherein the decision-level model obtained by the machine learning method is obtained by pre-training, and specifically comprises:
the preprocessing module is used for preprocessing data by taking fault data related to equipment history as training data to form a training set and a test set;
a training module for training the decision-level model using the training set;
a test module for testing the decision-level model using the test set;
and the iterative training module is used for updating the model parameters of the decision-making model according to the test result and obtaining the decision-making model through iterative training.
CN202310001115.1A 2023-01-03 2023-01-03 Equipment fault fusion prediction method and system based on associated parameter mining Active CN115689071B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202310001115.1A CN115689071B (en) 2023-01-03 2023-01-03 Equipment fault fusion prediction method and system based on associated parameter mining

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202310001115.1A CN115689071B (en) 2023-01-03 2023-01-03 Equipment fault fusion prediction method and system based on associated parameter mining

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN115689071A true CN115689071A (en) 2023-02-03
CN115689071B CN115689071B (en) 2023-05-02

Family

ID=85057536

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202310001115.1A Active CN115689071B (en) 2023-01-03 2023-01-03 Equipment fault fusion prediction method and system based on associated parameter mining

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN115689071B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN116755403A (en) * 2023-06-13 2023-09-15 英利新能源(宁夏)有限公司 Data acquisition method and system based on photovoltaic module production control system

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110008253A (en) * 2019-03-28 2019-07-12 浙江大学 The industrial data association rule mining and unusual service condition prediction technique of strategy are generated based on two stages frequent item set
CN110008565A (en) * 2019-03-28 2019-07-12 浙江大学 A kind of industrial process unusual service condition prediction technique based on operating parameter association analysis
CN110018670A (en) * 2019-03-28 2019-07-16 浙江大学 A kind of industrial process unusual service condition prediction technique excavated based on dynamic association rules
CN112801426A (en) * 2021-04-06 2021-05-14 浙江浙能技术研究院有限公司 Industrial process fault fusion prediction method based on correlation parameter mining
CN112906969A (en) * 2021-03-01 2021-06-04 三一重工股份有限公司 Engine fault prediction method, engine fault prediction device, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN114818515A (en) * 2022-06-24 2022-07-29 中国海洋大学 Multidimensional time sequence prediction method based on self-attention mechanism and graph convolution network

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110008253A (en) * 2019-03-28 2019-07-12 浙江大学 The industrial data association rule mining and unusual service condition prediction technique of strategy are generated based on two stages frequent item set
CN110008565A (en) * 2019-03-28 2019-07-12 浙江大学 A kind of industrial process unusual service condition prediction technique based on operating parameter association analysis
CN110018670A (en) * 2019-03-28 2019-07-16 浙江大学 A kind of industrial process unusual service condition prediction technique excavated based on dynamic association rules
CN112906969A (en) * 2021-03-01 2021-06-04 三一重工股份有限公司 Engine fault prediction method, engine fault prediction device, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN112801426A (en) * 2021-04-06 2021-05-14 浙江浙能技术研究院有限公司 Industrial process fault fusion prediction method based on correlation parameter mining
CN114818515A (en) * 2022-06-24 2022-07-29 中国海洋大学 Multidimensional time sequence prediction method based on self-attention mechanism and graph convolution network

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN116755403A (en) * 2023-06-13 2023-09-15 英利新能源(宁夏)有限公司 Data acquisition method and system based on photovoltaic module production control system
CN116755403B (en) * 2023-06-13 2024-03-26 英利新能源(宁夏)有限公司 Data acquisition method and system based on photovoltaic module production control system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN115689071B (en) 2023-05-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN109146093B (en) Power equipment field investigation method based on learning
CN105092999B (en) Positioned using the power quality events of multiple instructions
US10355478B2 (en) System and method for asset health monitoring using multi-dimensional risk assessment
CN111639921B (en) Intelligent equipment fault judgment and auxiliary disposal method based on expert system
CN110222889B (en) Power distribution network feeder automation terminal configuration method based on multiple intelligent algorithms
CN111369168B (en) Associated feature selection method suitable for multiple regulation and control operation scenes of power grid
CN107844628B (en) Redundancy optimization method for large-scale offshore wind farm power collection system
CN115689071B (en) Equipment fault fusion prediction method and system based on associated parameter mining
CN111488896A (en) Distribution line time-varying fault probability calculation method based on multi-source data mining
CN107632234A (en) A kind of deformation of transformer winding appraisal procedure based on recorder data
CN109919432A (en) A kind of substation equipment failure analysis of Influential Factors method based on big data
Liu et al. Reinforcement learning for cyber-physical security assessment of power systems
CN113052473B (en) Power grid risk analysis method based on fault rate and static safety analysis
CN114692787B (en) Multi-source data-based three-winding main transformer event analysis processing method and system
CN115358355A (en) Method and device for judging main transformer oil temperature gauge and top layer oil temperature abnormity
CN109377044A (en) A kind of trouble hunting Cost Analysis Method of intelligent substation protection equipment
Huang et al. Extracting substation cyber-physical architecture through intelligent electronic devices' data
Li et al. Reliability improvement to UPFC with routine test to the abnormal state
Pedersen et al. Data Validation for Digitally Enabled Operation & Maintenance of District Heating Systems
de Oliveira et al. Voltage dips caused by faults in a transmission system: a monitoring case study of a sensitive industrial consumer
CN112001073A (en) Reliability analysis research method of traction power supply system
CN110826179A (en) Intelligent substation relay protection real-time reliability prediction method
CN117911196B (en) Ring main unit full-period operation data supervision system and method based on artificial intelligence
Peharda et al. An Advanced Tool for Data Analysis of Energy Management System Calculations
CN114291675B (en) Elevator fault diagnosis method based on complex network and confidence rule reasoning

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant
TR01 Transfer of patent right
TR01 Transfer of patent right

Effective date of registration: 20240208

Address after: No.198 GANGLONG Road, Yangzhong Development Zone, Zhenjiang City, Jiangsu Province, 212000

Patentee after: Zhenjiang Anhua Electric Group Co.,Ltd.

Country or region after: China

Address before: Room 1001-3, Tower C, Zhimengyuan, 4 Gupinggang, Gulou District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000

Patentee before: Nanjing University of Technology Jinhong Energy Technology Co.,Ltd.

Country or region before: China