CN115222276A - Bidding analysis and evaluation method and device - Google Patents
Bidding analysis and evaluation method and device Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN115222276A CN115222276A CN202210905850.0A CN202210905850A CN115222276A CN 115222276 A CN115222276 A CN 115222276A CN 202210905850 A CN202210905850 A CN 202210905850A CN 115222276 A CN115222276 A CN 115222276A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- evaluation
- analysis
- evaluator
- questionnaire
- scoring
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/21—Design, administration or maintenance of databases
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/24—Querying
- G06F16/248—Presentation of query results
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/28—Databases characterised by their database models, e.g. relational or object models
- G06F16/284—Relational databases
- G06F16/285—Clustering or classification
Abstract
The invention discloses a method and a device for analyzing and evaluating a competitive product, wherein the method comprises the following steps: obtaining a questionnaire of a preset analysis item, and providing the questionnaire for an evaluator at least with an evaluation grade; storing the evaluation results of an evaluator on an evaluation questionnaire at a local end in an off-line mode, and recording record information related to at least one evaluation result, wherein the record information comprises scores, pictures, videos, audios, characters and collections and is used for supporting and evidentiating the evaluation results; when a network environment is detected, uploading the evaluation result and the recording information to a background server; and forming a competitive product analysis and evaluation data report according to the evaluation result and the evaluation grade of the evaluator, displaying the competitive product analysis and evaluation data report in a dynamic chart form, and referring to the record information.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of data analysis, in particular to a method and a device for analyzing and evaluating a competitive product.
Background
In recent years, the automobile industry in China is rapidly developed, and the development cycle in the automobile field is further compressed. Competitive product analysis is used as an important link in the trial-manufacturing process of the sample car, important information input is provided for the trial-manufacturing of the sample car, engineers are helped to find the product positioning of the engineers better, the advantages and the disadvantages of the products are found, further optimization iteration of the products is promoted, and deeper user use scenes and requirements are excavated. In each stage of automobile research and development, the functions and the performances of the sample automobile need to be tested and analyzed so as to help engineers know the current state of the sample automobile and the next optimization direction. The data collection and processing of the current competitive product vehicle test are basically carried out in a mode of manually inputting a data output chart on the basis of manpower. On the background that advanced management means such as informatization and digitization are applied in various industries at the present stage to greatly improve efficiency, the field of automobile research and development needs to update and upgrade the management means once. The digital information processing means is taken as the leading-edge level of a management mode, and mainly quantifies the competitive product analysis work from a rough transaction type to a fine data type by means of the development of computer and network technology, and problems are found through the analysis of big data, so that decision reference is provided, and the management efficiency is greatly improved.
Currently, each host factory mostly uses questionnaires to collect participant evaluation results, and the quality of questionnaire result information collected in this way is usually low, such as: missing filling and wrong filling of participants; the evaluation result is influenced by the inconsistency of the participant evaluation levels; manual analysis of data is slow and error rates exist, among other things.
Disclosure of Invention
In view of the above technical problems, the present invention provides a method and a device for analyzing and evaluating a game product, which can accurately obtain an analysis and evaluation result.
In a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for analyzing and evaluating a bid, comprising:
obtaining a questionnaire of a preset analysis item, and providing the questionnaire for an evaluator at least with an evaluation grade;
storing the evaluation results of an evaluator on an evaluation questionnaire at a local end in an off-line mode, and recording record information related to at least one evaluation result, wherein the record information comprises scores, pictures, videos, audios, characters and collections and is used for supporting and attesting the evaluation results; uploading the evaluation result and the recording information to a background server when a network environment is detected;
and forming a competitive product analysis and evaluation data report according to the evaluation result and the evaluation grade of the evaluator, displaying the competitive product analysis and evaluation data report in a form of at least a dynamic chart, and referring to the record information.
Optionally, said providing the questionnaire to the evaluator with at least an evaluation level comprises:
and displaying the contents of specific items related to scoring in the questionnaire as a unidirectional scoring bar or a bidirectional scoring bar, wherein the evaluators can slide the unidirectional scoring bar or the bidirectional scoring bar for scoring.
Optionally, the forming a data report of the analysis and evaluation of the auction products according to the evaluation result and the evaluation grade of the evaluator comprises:
taking the product of the score and the adjustment coefficient in the evaluation result as a final score according to the adjustment coefficient corresponding to the evaluation grade of the evaluator; and marking deviation data generated due to the evaluation grade of the evaluator in the competitive product analysis evaluation data report.
Optionally, the forming a data report of the analysis and evaluation of the auction products according to the evaluation result and the evaluation grade of the evaluator comprises:
and when the scoring result of the evaluator marked in the competitive product analysis and evaluation data report exceeds a preset deviation value, displaying the scoring result in a marked color.
Optionally, the bid analysis and evaluation method further includes:
and traversing each questionnaire question of the questionnaire, and displaying and reminding the unoperated questionnaire questions.
In a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a bid analysis and evaluation apparatus comprising:
the system comprises an information collection module, a data processing module and a data processing module, wherein the information collection module is used for acquiring a questionnaire of a preset analysis item and providing the questionnaire for evaluators at least with evaluation grades;
the recording module is used for storing the evaluation results of the evaluators for the evaluation questionnaires at a local end in an off-line mode and recording the recording information related to at least one evaluation result, wherein the recording information comprises scores, pictures, videos, audios, characters and collections and is used for supporting and evidentiating the evaluation results; uploading the evaluation result and the recording information to a background server when a network environment is detected;
and the analysis evaluation module is used for forming a competitive product analysis evaluation data report according to the evaluation result and the evaluation grade of an evaluator, displaying the competitive product analysis evaluation data report at least in a dynamic chart form, and providing the record information for reference.
Optionally, the information collection module includes a scoring bar unit, and the scoring bar unit is configured to display contents of specific items related to scoring in the questionnaire as a unidirectional scoring bar or a bidirectional scoring bar, and the evaluator may slide the unidirectional scoring bar or the bidirectional scoring bar to score.
Optionally, the analysis and evaluation module is further configured to take a product of the score and the adjustment coefficient in the evaluation result as a final score according to the adjustment coefficient corresponding to the evaluation level of the evaluator; and marking deviation data generated due to the evaluation grade of the evaluator in the competitive product analysis evaluation data report.
Optionally, the analysis and evaluation module is further configured to display the scoring result marked by the evaluator in the auction analysis and evaluation data report in a prominent color when the scoring result exceeds a preset deviation value.
In a third aspect of the embodiments of the present invention, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, on which a computer program is stored, which, when executed by a computer, performs the method according to the first aspect of the embodiments of the present invention.
The technical scheme provided by the invention can be used based on an off-line environment, has lower requirements on network conditions and is suitable for diversified scenes; the invention also takes the record information of the evaluator about the evaluation result as a reference factor, so that the evaluator can conveniently retrieve the actual reason of the evaluation result, thereby improving the accuracy of the evaluation result and facilitating the research and development personnel to know the improvement direction of the product.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow chart illustrating a method for analyzing and evaluating a bid item according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of two scoring bars in an example of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an exemplary device for analyzing and evaluating a bid item.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
As shown in fig. 1, the method for analyzing and evaluating a bid provided by the present invention comprises the following steps:
As an early material preparation stage; the vehicle benchmarking analysis comprises various items, such as questionnaires for dynamic test driving evaluation, static evaluation and the like, the evaluation content is input by a background system, and the function modules can be increased and decreased in a self-defined mode. Evaluators may log in using the iPad port, using the questionnaire system. The questionnaire system is a subjective evaluation system integrating data collection, analysis and output aiming at the automobile industry. The system can help data to be efficiently input and uploaded to a background database, supports visual analysis and automatically generates a data report.
The information of the first-time participation evaluator needs to be input into the system in advance, and the information of the organization architecture in the company can be called to obtain the information of the evaluator. The evaluation grade of the evaluator can be classified and graded according to information such as department, position, working age and the like of the evaluator, and the grade of a newly registered user is the primary grade. The grading is convenient for counting evaluation scores, namely different grades correspond to different grading adjustment coefficients, and the problem that the evaluation result of an evaluator is different from the actual demand can be reduced through coefficient adjustment. For example, evaluators are not familiar with the contents of questionnaires, and the evaluation results have a slightly low reliability, so that they are not suitable for being used as a key reference in statistics.
In one embodiment, the product of the score and the adjustment coefficient in the evaluation result is used as the final score according to the adjustment coefficient corresponding to the evaluation level of the evaluator. Illustratively, the evaluator is a general worker, has strong professional performance, is a high-grade scorer, and has a score adjustment coefficient of 1, and the evaluator is a common worker, and has a score adjustment coefficient of 0.3 for a primary scorer. The above purpose can be achieved by adding a weight ratio plug-in unit in the data processing process, and the final evaluation result is not influenced even if the evaluation levels of the participants are different.
And 130, forming a competitive product analysis and evaluation data report according to the evaluation result and the evaluation grade of the evaluator, displaying the competitive product analysis and evaluation data report at least in a form of a dynamic chart, and providing the record information for reference. The step is a data analysis and output stage.
In this step, the questionnaire system supports offline environmental use. The off-line function is mainly used for collecting data and submitting forms in a non-network environment, and after networking, the forms submitted in an off-line state are uploaded to a background server. The function is mainly realized by using storage data storage in the uni-app framework; the method comprises the steps of firstly obtaining the current network connection state of a terminal, judging whether the current network state is an off-line state, storing form data submitted by a user in the local state in the off-line state, and transmitting the data stored in the local state into a background database in the presence of a network environment.
For example, dynamic and static subjective evaluation of an automobile is mostly carried out in an outdoor non-network environment, compared with evaluation systems developed by other host factories, the system has lower requirements on environment and network conditions, so that the use scene is diversified, a user only needs to log in a terminal APP to enter a questionnaire page to carry out off-line evaluation, acquired data are stored in a background database in real time, and the data loss condition is effectively avoided.
Furthermore, when the evaluators fill in the questionnaires, the data collected by the scoring bars are quantitative data, the data collected by the collection module are qualitative data, and the qualitative data are optional items and are used for collecting and explaining the reason of the current scoring and the current product state. For example, when the seat comfort evaluation analysis is performed, when the average score is 6, the reason that the score is 6 can be explained in the modes of pictures, videos, audios, characters, collection and the like, and the pictures, the videos, the audios, the characters and the collection can be retrieved in the background server so as to fully know the current score, facilitate the intuitive understanding of product problems and bring convenience for engineers to put forward improvement directions. The information that evaluators may collect using the favorites tool may be used as support and basis for scoring results. And after completing the questionnaire, the evaluators submit the questionnaire offline, and when a network environment is detected, all the data are uploaded to a background server. The user may view the assessment results at the personal/overall score overview. The invention adds various information collection modes such as voice, video, photographing, character editing and the like, and can help evaluators determine the emphasis point of each evaluation and output the evaluation result in a user-defined manner.
After the evaluators submit questionnaires, the evaluation data can display a competitive product analysis evaluation data report in terminal APP of the evaluators, and the report is displayed in a dynamic chart form; including charts, data, etc., can help evaluators to quickly output evaluation results. In addition to the above-mentioned graph content, which can improve data analysis, the recorded information can also be referred to in the page of the background server, which facilitates understanding of specific problems of the product, scoring margins, and possible optimization solutions collected from qualitative data.
Further, in order to solve the problem that the evaluation level of an evaluator is different, the final evaluation result is not influenced. Deviation data resulting from the evaluators' rating may be flagged in the contest analysis evaluation data report. In one embodiment, the weighted ratio of the evaluator is substituted into the weighted ratio of the evaluator to obtain an average value, and 20% of deviation data is marked as red in the evaluation result, so that the statistical analyzer is reminded to pay attention to the data. Of course, the deviation data of the scores of multiple evaluators is marked in the bid analysis assessment data report and displayed with a mark in a prominent color, such as red, yellow, etc.; i.e., data results that deviate from a preset deviation value. For example, considering that the evaluation abilities of the evaluation personnel are different, when the average value is calculated, in order to avoid that the final output result is not influenced by the participants with insufficient evaluation abilities, the evaluation personnel are divided into a first level, a middle level and a high level, the ratio of the three levels is different, and when the average value is calculated, the weight ratio module is added to ensure the accuracy of the conclusion. The background supports the output of various dynamic chart types, and a data processor can compare and analyze at different latitudes and output corresponding charts. According to the invention, the reasonable weight ratio is given to the evaluation result according to different evaluation abilities of evaluators, so that the data analysis structure is more accurate.
The question omission often occurs during filling of the questionnaire, so that when an evaluator processes the questionnaire, the questionnaire questions of the questionnaire can be traversed, and the questionnaire questions which are not operated are displayed and reminded. For example, the label of the unprocessed questionnaire topic is identified, and the reminding purpose is realized.
The questionnaire of each big host computer factory at present collects data result, and this has the condition such as efficiency is slow, the error is big, the error rate is high, data are difficult for preserving, still has many use limitations, for example: and the dependency of part of questionnaire collection systems on a network is strong, only a single evaluation mode is supported, the fault tolerance rate of the system is low, and the user side interface lacks UI design, so that the functional modules are distributed unreasonably, and the mutual inductance difference is caused. In order to improve the fault tolerance rate and optimize UI design, the content of specific items related to scoring in the questionnaire is displayed as a one-way scoring strip or a two-way scoring strip, and evaluators can slide the one-way scoring strip or the two-way scoring strip to score. As shown in fig. 2, fig. 2a is a one-way score bar, and evaluators can slide one way to select a score, which is shown as 6.5. Fig. 2b is a two-way score bar, and the evaluator can slide to select a score in two directions, showing a score of 8. According to the invention, the fault tolerance rate of the questionnaire can be improved by optimizing the UI design, and the data accuracy is ensured.
The bid analysis and evaluation method is applied to a questionnaire system, a project developed by a current host factory can be displayed in a project name column, and an appraiser can enter a questionnaire interface related to the project through a project name port. For example, the questionnaire shows all the evaluation questionnaires related to the interior under the item name menu; in addition, all pictures and text information displayed by the terminal of the evaluator are reserved with custom ports and can be modified through a background system. By using the application of the digital technology in the automobile research and development process as an entry point, the questionnaire system applies the digital technology to the sample automobile research and development process, and can improve the questionnaire survey quality by using an integrated information collecting and processing system consisting of a computer network, a database, a mobile terminal tool, a visualization tool and the like.
As shown in fig. 3, the present invention also provides a bid analysis and evaluation apparatus, including:
the information collecting module 31 is configured to obtain a questionnaire of a preset analysis item, and provide the questionnaire to an evaluator with at least an evaluation level. Evaluators can log in using the iPad port, using the questionnaire system. The questionnaire system is a subjective evaluation system integrating data collection, analysis and output aiming at the automobile industry. The system can help data to be efficiently input and uploaded to a background database, support visual analysis and automatically generate a data report. The evaluation grade of the evaluators can be classified and graded according to information such as departments, positions, working ages and the like of the evaluators. The grading is convenient for counting evaluation scores, namely different grades correspond to different grading adjustment coefficients, and the problem that evaluation results of evaluators are different from actual requirements can be solved through coefficient adjustment.
The recording module 32 is used for storing the evaluation result of the evaluator on the evaluation questionnaire at the local end in an off-line mode, and recording the recording information related to at least one evaluation result, wherein the recording information comprises score, picture, video, audio, text and collection and is used for supporting and documenting at least one carrier information in the evaluation result; and uploading the evaluation result and the record information to a background server when a network environment is detected.
And the analysis evaluation module 33 is used for forming a competitive product analysis evaluation data report according to the evaluation result and the evaluation grade of the evaluator, displaying the competitive product analysis evaluation data report at least in a form of a dynamic chart, and providing the record information for reference.
The analysis and evaluation module 33 is further configured to take a product of the score and the adjustment coefficient in the evaluation result as a final score according to the adjustment coefficient corresponding to the evaluation level of the evaluator; and marking in the competitive product analysis and evaluation data report and marking deviation data generated by the evaluation grade of an evaluator in the competitive product analysis and evaluation data report, namely a data result deviating from a preset deviation value.
The analysis and evaluation module 33 is further configured to mark a marked color for display when the scoring result of the evaluator marked in the auction analysis and evaluation data report exceeds a preset deviation value.
Further, the information collecting module 31 includes a scoring bar unit, and the scoring bar unit is configured to display contents of specific items related to scoring in the questionnaire as a one-way scoring bar or a two-way scoring bar, and the evaluator can slide the one-way scoring bar or the two-way scoring bar to score.
The invention also provides a computer-readable storage medium on which a computer program is stored, which computer program, when being executed by a processor, realizes the steps of the above mentioned auction product analysis and evaluation method.
It is understood that the computer-readable storage medium may include: any entity or device capable of carrying a computer program, recording medium, U-disk, removable hard disk, magnetic disk, optical disk, computer Memory, read-Only Memory (ROM), random Access Memory (RAM), software distribution medium, and the like. The computer program includes computer program code. The computer program code may be in the form of source code, object code, an executable file or some intermediate form, etc. The computer-readable storage medium may include: any entity or device capable of carrying computer program code, recording medium, U-disk, removable hard disk, magnetic disk, optical disk, computer Memory, read-Only Memory (ROM), random Access Memory (RAM), software distribution medium, and the like.
In some embodiments of the present invention, the apparatus may include a controller, and the controller is a single chip integrated with a processor, a memory, a communication module, and the like. The processor may refer to a processor included in the controller. The Processor may be a Central Processing Unit (CPU), other general purpose Processor, a Digital Signal Processor (DSP), an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), a Field-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) or other Programmable logic device, discrete Gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components, etc.
Any process or method descriptions in flow charts or otherwise described herein may be understood as representing modules, segments, or portions of code which include one or more executable instructions for implementing specific logical functions or steps of the process, and alternate implementations are included within the scope of the preferred embodiment of the present invention in which functions may be executed out of order from that shown or discussed, including substantially concurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionality involved, as would be understood by those reasonably skilled in the art of the present invention.
Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the elements and algorithm steps of the examples described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be embodied in electronic hardware, computer software, or combinations of both, and that the components and steps of the examples have been described in a functional general in the foregoing description for the purpose of illustrating clearly the interchangeability of hardware and software. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the technical solution. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the present invention.
The above examples are only intended to illustrate the technical solution of the present invention, and not to limit it; although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that: the technical solutions described in the foregoing embodiments may still be modified, or some technical features may be equivalently replaced; and such modifications or substitutions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the corresponding technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. A method for analyzing and evaluating an item for competition, comprising:
obtaining a questionnaire of a preset analysis item, and providing the questionnaire for an evaluator at least with an evaluation grade;
storing the evaluation results of an evaluator on an evaluation questionnaire at a local end in an off-line mode, and recording record information related to at least one evaluation result, wherein the record information comprises scores, pictures, videos, audios, characters and collections and is used for supporting and evidentiating the evaluation results; when a network environment is detected, uploading the evaluation result and the recording information to a background server;
and forming a competitive product analysis and evaluation data report according to the evaluation result and the evaluation grade of the evaluator, displaying the competitive product analysis and evaluation data report in a form of at least a dynamic chart, and referring to the record information.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein said providing the questionnaire to at least one evaluator with an evaluation rating comprises:
and displaying the contents of specific items related to scoring in the questionnaire as a unidirectional scoring bar or a bidirectional scoring bar, wherein the evaluators can slide the unidirectional scoring bar or the bidirectional scoring bar for scoring.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein said forming a data report of the analysis and evaluation of the game based on the evaluation result and the evaluation grade of the evaluator comprises:
taking the product of the score and the adjustment coefficient in the evaluation result as a final score according to the adjustment coefficient corresponding to the evaluation grade of the evaluator; and marking deviation data generated due to the evaluation grade of the evaluator in the competitive product analysis evaluation data report.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein said forming a data report of the analysis and evaluation of the game based on the evaluation result and the evaluation grade of the evaluator comprises:
and when the scoring result of the evaluator marked in the competitive product analysis and evaluation data report exceeds a preset deviation value, displaying the scoring result in a marked color.
5. The bid analysis evaluation method of claim 1, wherein the bid analysis evaluation method further comprises:
and traversing each questionnaire question of the questionnaire, and displaying and reminding the unoperated questionnaire questions.
6. An auction item analysis and evaluation device, comprising:
the system comprises an information collection module, a data processing module and a data processing module, wherein the information collection module is used for acquiring a questionnaire of a preset analysis item and providing the questionnaire for evaluators at least with evaluation grades;
the recording module is used for storing the evaluation results of the evaluators on the evaluation questionnaires at a local end in an off-line mode, and recording the recording information related to at least one evaluation result, wherein the recording information comprises scores, pictures, videos, audios, characters and collections and is used for supporting and evidentiary evaluation results; when a network environment is detected, uploading the evaluation result and the recording information to a background server;
and the analysis evaluation module is used for forming a competitive product analysis evaluation data report according to the evaluation result and the evaluation grade of an evaluator, displaying the competitive product analysis evaluation data report at least in a dynamic chart form, and providing the record information for reference.
7. The bid analysis and evaluation device according to claim 6, wherein the information collection module comprises a scoring bar unit, the scoring bar unit is used for displaying the contents of the specific items related to scoring in the questionnaire as a one-way scoring bar or a two-way scoring bar, and the evaluator can slide the one-way scoring bar or the two-way scoring bar for scoring.
8. The bid item analyzing and evaluating device according to claim 6, wherein the analyzing and evaluating module is further configured to take a product of a score and an adjusting coefficient in an evaluation result as a final score according to the adjusting coefficient corresponding to the evaluation level of the evaluator; and marking deviation data generated due to the evaluation grade of the evaluator in the competitive product analysis evaluation data report.
9. The bid analysis and evaluation device of claim 6 wherein the analysis and evaluation module is further configured to mark a significant color for display when the scoring result of the evaluators in the bid analysis and evaluation data report exceeds a predetermined deviation value.
10. A computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored which, when executed by a computer, performs the method of any one of claims 1 to 5.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210905850.0A CN115222276A (en) | 2022-07-29 | 2022-07-29 | Bidding analysis and evaluation method and device |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210905850.0A CN115222276A (en) | 2022-07-29 | 2022-07-29 | Bidding analysis and evaluation method and device |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN115222276A true CN115222276A (en) | 2022-10-21 |
Family
ID=83613202
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210905850.0A Pending CN115222276A (en) | 2022-07-29 | 2022-07-29 | Bidding analysis and evaluation method and device |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN115222276A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN116664173A (en) * | 2023-08-02 | 2023-08-29 | 成都信通信息技术有限公司 | Big data model-based bid analysis method, terminal and storage medium |
-
2022
- 2022-07-29 CN CN202210905850.0A patent/CN115222276A/en active Pending
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN116664173A (en) * | 2023-08-02 | 2023-08-29 | 成都信通信息技术有限公司 | Big data model-based bid analysis method, terminal and storage medium |
| CN116664173B (en) * | 2023-08-02 | 2023-11-14 | 成都信通信息技术有限公司 | Big data model-based bid analysis method, terminal and storage medium |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US8782216B2 (en) | Quantitative management assessments of data communication networks with converged architectures | |
| US7702078B2 (en) | Method, system and computer program product for facilitating the analysis of automatic line insulation testing data | |
| US20170154287A1 (en) | Waste management simulation system and method | |
| US20210224972A1 (en) | Parcel change detection | |
| CN112380190B (en) | Data quality health degree analysis method and system based on multidimensional analysis technology | |
| CN113807747A (en) | Enterprise budget management maturity evaluation system | |
| CN115222276A (en) | Bidding analysis and evaluation method and device | |
| CN103945219A (en) | Network side video quality monitoring system | |
| Rigger et al. | Design automation state of practice-potential and opportunities | |
| CN111178778A (en) | Security activity scheme generation method and system based on machine learning and security activity management system | |
| CN114971693A (en) | Engineering cost consultation management system based on BIM | |
| CN115689415A (en) | Digital twin-based logistics monitoring and simulation system | |
| CN106997500A (en) | The convenient method of inspection of product and device | |
| CN108337323B (en) | Instrument metering data AR comparison system and method based on full terminal | |
| CN114328169A (en) | Dynamic page testing method and system | |
| Rosslyn-Smith et al. | Establishing turnaround potential before commencement of formal turnaround proceedings | |
| CN111209320A (en) | Method and system for collecting education information data | |
| CN115525959B (en) | Engineering cost data analysis method and platform based on big data analysis and cloud computing | |
| KR20200019817A (en) | Method and system of assessment and ranking of on-line education | |
| CN115134853A (en) | Communication base station evaluation method and system, electronic device and storage medium | |
| CN113468427A (en) | Network public opinion monitoring and analyzing method and device | |
| CN112330083A (en) | Quantitative evaluation method based on big data | |
| CN113962669A (en) | Construction project cost auditing method and system | |
| CN114218086A (en) | Case testing method, device and equipment and readable storage medium | |
| CN112232675A (en) | Combined wind field evaluation method, device and system |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |