CN115019561B - External collision risk early warning system of ship towing system under mutual-seeing condition - Google Patents
External collision risk early warning system of ship towing system under mutual-seeing condition Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN115019561B CN115019561B CN202210947818.9A CN202210947818A CN115019561B CN 115019561 B CN115019561 B CN 115019561B CN 202210947818 A CN202210947818 A CN 202210947818A CN 115019561 B CN115019561 B CN 115019561B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- ship
- collision risk
- collision
- module
- vessel
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000011002 quantification Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 57
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 33
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 32
- 238000013441 quality evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 claims description 113
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 14
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 10
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011217 control strategy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013139 quantization Methods 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G3/00—Traffic control systems for marine craft
- G08G3/02—Anti-collision systems
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Ocean & Marine Engineering (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to an external collision risk early warning system of a ship towing system under a mutual-seeing condition. The system comprises an information collection module, an external collision risk detection module and a collision risk early warning quantification module; the external collision risk detection module is used for judging whether collision risks exist between the towing system and other ships or not according to the ship field theoretical module and the nonlinear velocity barrier algorithm module; the collision risk early warning quantification module comprises a ship avoidance obligation identification module, an other ship intention estimation module, an other ship motion quality evaluation module, a collision avoidance rule examination module, an other ship collision risk elimination capacity quantification module and an early warning grade quantification module. The invention can not only automatically detect whether collision risk exists between other ships and any ship in the towing system, but also issue collision risk early warnings of different levels when collision risk exists, and remind towing operation personnel to take reasonable avoidance measures to ensure towing safety of the towing system.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of towing, in particular to an external collision risk early warning system of a ship towing system under a mutual-seeing condition.
Background
The towing work of ships plays an important role in marine transportation, and is increasingly applied to various scenes on the sea. The towing operation of a ship is generally performed by a ship towing system, and a common ship towing system is composed of a front tug, a rear tug, and a cable connecting them, as shown in fig. 1, and a tandem towing system composed of two tugs and one tug. Compared with a single-tug towing mode, the series towing mode comprises a front tug and a rear tug, and controllability of towing operation is improved.
With the rapid development of maritime trade, more and more ships are used for transportation, and the possibility of collision among the ships is greatly improved; at the same time, variable weather, complex traffic conditions, and limited maneuverability of the towing system itself increase the risk of the vessel towing system colliding with other surrounding vessels.
In practice, when towing is performed, in order to avoid external collision between each ship in the towing system and a ship around the towing system, other ships around the towing system are generally restricted from passing through the water around the towing system. However, the policy of restricting passage has the following drawbacks: firstly, the traffic control strategy excessively depends on expert knowledge, and automation cannot be realized; second, restrictions on the passage of ships around the towing system can reduce the utilization of the channel.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention provides an external collision risk early warning system of a ship towing system under a mutual-seeing condition, which can automatically detect whether collision risk exists between other ships and any ship in the towing system, and can issue collision risk early warnings in different levels when collision risk exists, so as to remind towing operators to take reasonable avoidance measures to ensure towing safety of the towing system.
In order to achieve the above purpose, the invention provides an external collision risk early warning system of a ship towing system under a mutual-seeing condition, which is characterized in that: the system comprises an information collection module, an external collision risk detection module and a collision risk early warning quantification module;
the information collection module is used for collecting the towed ship navigation track, the towed ship basic information, the front towed ship basic information, the rear towed ship basic information, and other ship basic information and navigation information around the towing system in the towing system under the environment interference;
the external collision risk detection module is used for judging whether collision risks exist between the towing system and other ships or not according to the ship field theoretical module and the nonlinear velocity barrier algorithm module;
the ship field theoretical module is used for judging whether collision risks exist or not according to whether the ship field of the other ship covers the ship field of the towed ship, the front towed ship or the rear towed ship within a certain observation time, and if the ship field of the other ship does not intersect with the ship field of the towed ship, the front towed ship or the rear towed ship, the other ship does not have collision risks with the towing system; if the ship field of the other ship is intersected with the ship field of the towed ship, or the ship field of the front towed ship or the ship field of the rear towed ship, the other ship and the towing system have collision risks, and then a collision risk early warning quantification module is started;
the nonlinear velocity obstacle algorithm module is used for acquiring a velocity vector set of collision between the other ship and the towing system according to the position of the other ship and the navigation track of each ship in the towing system; if the actual speed of the ship is out of the speed vector set, collision risks do not exist between the ship and the towed ship, or between the ship and a front towed ship, or between the ship and a rear towed ship; if the actual speed of the other ship is in the speed vector set, collision risks exist between the other ship and a towed ship, or between a front towed ship or a rear towed ship, and a collision risk early warning quantification module is started;
the collision risk early warning quantification module comprises a ship avoidance obligation identification module, an other ship intention estimation module, an other ship motion quality evaluation module, a collision avoidance rule examination module, an other ship collision risk elimination capacity quantification module and an early warning grade quantification module;
the ship avoidance obligation identification module is used for determining whether the ship is a way-giving ship or not according to the international maritime collision avoidance rule, and starting the ship intention estimation module if the ship is the way-giving ship; if the ship is not the way-giving ship, collision risk exists, and an early warning level quantification module is started;
the other ship intention estimation module is used for checking whether the other ship takes evasive action to avoid collision or not, and starting the other ship movement quality evaluation module if the other ship takes evasive action; if the other ship does not take evasive action, starting a collision risk eliminating capability quantification module of the other ship;
the method for checking whether other ships take evasive action by the other ship intention estimation module is that if the other ship intention index is 1, the other ships take evasive action; if the intention index of the other ship is 0, the other ship is indicated to not take evasive action; the other boat intention index is expressed as:
wherein,
Int(t 0 ) Is t 0 At the moment, the index of the intention of other ships,
V Intr (t 0 ) Is t 0 At the moment of time the speed of the other vessel,
S NL_VO (t 0 ) Is t 0 The speed at which the other vessel collides with the tug, or the forward tug, or the aft tug (b-2),
and n represents the intersection of the two points,
ΔC Intr (t 0 ) Represents t 0 The route change of the other ship at the moment;
the other ship motion quality evaluation module is used for judging whether the avoiding action of the other ship can effectively eliminate the collision risk or not, and if the avoiding action of the other ship can effectively eliminate the collision risk, the collision avoidance rule examination module is started; if the evasive action of other ships can not effectively eliminate the collision risk, starting an early warning level quantification module; the method for judging whether the avoiding action of the other ship can effectively eliminate the collision risk by the other ship action quality evaluation module is that if the avoiding action index of the other ship is 1, the avoiding action of the other ship can effectively eliminate the collision risk; if the evasive action index of the other ship is 0, the evasive action index indicates that the evasive action of the other ship cannot effectively eliminate the collision risk; the avoidance behavior index is expressed as:
wherein,
AQ(t 0 ) Is t 0 The evasive action index of other ships at the moment,
P TS (x，y，t 0 ) Is t 0 Position of trailing, or leading, or trailing, vessel at the moment, P Intr (x，y，t 0 ) Is t 0 At the moment in time the position of the other vessel,
Dis(P TS (x，y，t 0 )，P Intr (x，y，t 0 ) Is t) 0 The distance between the other ship and the towed ship, or the front towed ship, or the rear towed ship at the moment,
minDisTS represents the minimum distance at which collision risk can be eliminated by adopting evasive action;
the collision avoidance rule examination module is used for examining whether the avoiding action of other ships violates the relevant avoiding action clause of the international maritime collision avoidance rule, and starting the early warning level quantification module no matter whether the avoiding action of other ships violates the relevant avoiding action clause of the international maritime collision avoidance rule;
the method for the collision avoidance rule examination module to examine whether the avoiding action of other ships violates the international maritime collision avoidance rule is that if the examination result index is 1, the other ships do not violate the international maritime collision avoidance rule; if the examination result index is 0, the ship violates the international maritime collision avoidance rule; the examination result index is expressed as:
wherein,
col is the examination result index of the International rules for avoiding collision at sea,
CPA means the closest point of approach to ensure arrival of the tow vessel or forward or aft tug with other vessels,
RB CPA indicating the relative orientation of his ship when it arrives at the CPA;
the other ship collision risk eliminating capacity quantifying module is used for determining the capacity of the other ship for eliminating collision risks according to the operation performance of the other ship and starting the early warning level quantifying module according to the level of the capacity of the other ship for eliminating collision risks;
the risk elimination capability in the other ship collision risk elimination capability quantification module is expressed as follows:
wherein,
L AMM for the risk elimination capability that the ship has,
the AMM is the operational margin that other vessels have,
AMM 1 is the upper threshold limit that other vessels have,
AMM 2 a lower threshold for other vessels;
the early warning level quantification module is used for carrying out level quantification on the external collision risk and issuing risk early warning;
the early warning level quantification module quantifies 'caution, warning and warning' three levels of external collision risks, and the specific quantification standard is,
if the ship is not the way-giving ship, collision risk exists, and the collision risk level is 'alarm';
if the other ship is a concession ship and takes evasive action, but the evasive action of the other ship cannot effectively eliminate the collision risk, the collision risk level is 'alarm';
if the ship is a way-giving ship and takes evasive action, and the evasive action of the ship can effectively eliminate the collision risk, but the evasive action of the ship violates action terms of the international maritime collision avoidance rule, the collision risk level is 'warning';
if the ship is a way-giving ship and takes evasive action, the evasive action of the ship can effectively eliminate the collision risk, and the evasive action of the ship complies with action terms of International rules for avoiding collision at sea, the collision risk level is 'careful';
if the other ship is a way-letting ship and does not take evasive action, determining a collision risk level matched with the collision risk elimination capability of the other ship according to a collision risk elimination capability quantification module of the other ship, wherein the specific method comprises the following steps: the collision risk level is "caution" if his ship collision risk elimination capability is high, "warning" if his ship collision risk elimination capability is moderate, and "alarm" if his ship collision risk elimination capability is low.
The invention has the advantages that:
1. according to the method, a ship field theoretical module and a nonlinear speed obstacle algorithm module are combined, the dynamic property of the avoidance behavior is considered, and on one hand, whether collision risks exist is judged according to whether the ship field of other ships is covered with the ship field of a towed ship, a front towed ship or a rear towed ship within a certain observation time; on the other hand, whether collision risks exist is judged according to whether the actual speed of the other ship is in the speed vector set, so that whether collision risks exist between the other ship and any ship in the towing system is automatically detected;
2. when determining that a collision risk exists between the other ship and any ship in the towing system, the method and the system issue corresponding collision risk early warnings in three levels of caution, warning and alarming respectively according to the judgment of whether the other ship is a way-giving ship, whether the other ship takes evasion action, whether the evasion action of the other ship can effectively eliminate the collision risk, whether the evasion action of the other ship violates the related evasion action terms of the international maritime collision avoidance rule and the capability of the other ship for eliminating the collision risk, and remind a towing operator to take reasonable avoidance measures to ensure the towing safety of the towing system.
The external collision risk early warning system of the ship towing system under the mutual condition can automatically detect whether collision risk exists between other ships and any ship in the towing system; when collision danger exists, collision risk early warning of different levels can be issued, towing operation personnel are reminded to take reasonable avoidance measures to guarantee towing safety of the towing system, passing limitation on ships around the towing system is not needed, and the utilization rate of a channel cannot be reduced.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a schematic composition diagram of a ship towing system in an external collision risk early warning system of the ship towing system in a mutual observation situation according to the present invention;
FIGS. 2a to 2f are simulation diagrams showing the state of the towing system of the present invention when it encounters another ship c-1 in a simulation experiment;
FIG. 3 is a graph of the relative distance between the towing system of FIGS. 2 a-2 f and another vessel c-1;
FIG. 4 is a graph of the variation of the collision risk level during the towing system of FIGS. 2 a-2 f encountering another vessel c-1;
FIGS. 5a to 5f are simulation diagrams showing the state of the towing system of the present invention when it encounters another ship c-2 in a simulation experiment;
FIG. 6 is a diagram of the relative distance between the towing system of FIGS. 5 a-5 f and the other vessel c-2;
FIG. 7 is a graph of the variation of the collision risk level during the encounter of the towing system of FIGS. 5 a-5 f with another vessel c-2;
FIG. 8 is a flow chart for quantifying the external collision risk level in accordance with the present invention;
in the figure: a tugboat a, a front tugboat b-1, a rear tugboat b-2, an other tugboat c-1 and an other tugboat c-2.
Detailed Description
The invention is described in further detail below with reference to the figures and specific embodiments.
In the description of the present invention, it should be noted that the terms "length", "width", "upper", "lower", "front", "rear", "left", "right", "vertical", "horizontal", "top", "bottom", "inner", "outer", etc. indicate orientations or positional relationships based on those shown in the drawings, and are only for convenience of description and simplicity of description, but do not indicate or imply that the referred device or element must have a specific orientation, be constructed in a specific orientation, and be operated, and thus, should not be construed as limiting the invention.
The external collision risk early warning system of the ship towing system under the mutual-seeing condition comprises an information collecting module 1, an external collision risk detecting module 2 and a collision risk early warning quantifying module 3.
The information collection module 1 is used for collecting the sailing track of the towed ship a, the basic ship information of the front towed ship b-1, the basic ship information of the rear towed ship b-2, and the basic ship information and the sailing information of other ships c around the towing system in the towing system under the environment interference through the AIS data.
The sailing track of the ship in the towing system under the environmental interference is obtained through modeling, and specific ship model parameters are shown in table 1. In the towing system simulation, basic information of the towed ship a, the front towed ship b-1, the rear towed ship b-2, and the other ships c is shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1 basic information of fore, aft, towed and other vessels
Other vessel c-1, other vessel c-2, forward tug b-1, aft tug b-2, and tug a in Table 1 were modeled based on "TitoNeri"260, and "CyberShip II," respectively; the length of the towing cable is 1m, the maximum value of the thruster is 10N, the change rate of the towing angle between the front towing vessel b-1 and the towed vessel a is not more than 5 degrees/s, and the towing angle alpha between the rear towing vessel b-2 and the towed vessel a 2 (t) the rate of change does not exceed 5 °/s; the maximum drag force of the front tug b-1 is 3N, the maximum drag force of the rear tug b-2 is 3N, and the traction force change rate is less than 1N/s.
Using scaled models of the fore tug b-1, aft tug b-2, and tug a in Table 1, a towing operation plan is given, as shown in Table 2.
TABLE 2 design of steering point towing operation under environmental disturbance
Table 2 shows the initial state including the starting positions and the heading of the forward tug b-1, the backward tug b-2 and the tug a, and the two turning points and one ending point are designed during the course of the voyage.
In the case where the wind is assumed to be constant, the relative wind speed is maintained at 1 m/s and the wind direction is 255 °. Furthermore, the towing work is performed under good visibility conditions.
The external collision risk detection module 2 is used for judging whether collision risks exist between the towing system and other ships c according to the ship field theoretical module 2-1 and the nonlinear velocity barrier algorithm module 2-2;
the ship field theoretical module 2-1 is used for judging whether collision risks exist or not according to whether the ship field of the other ship c is covered with the ship field of the towed ship a, the front towed ship b-1 or the rear towed ship b-2 within a certain observation time, and if the ship field of the other ship c is not intersected with the ship field of the towed ship a, the front towed ship b-1 or the rear towed ship b-2, the other ship c does not have collision risks with a towing system; if the ship field of the other ship c is intersected with the ship field of the towed ship a, the front towed ship b-1 or the rear towed ship b-2, the other ship c and the towing system have collision risks, and then the collision risk early warning quantification module 3 is started.
The nonlinear velocity barrier algorithm module 2-2 is used for obtaining a velocity vector set of collision between the other ship c and the towing system according to the position of the other ship c and the navigation track of each ship in the towing system; if the actual speed of the ship c is out of the speed vector set, no collision risk exists between the ship c and the towed ship a, or the front towed ship b-1, or the rear towed ship b-2; if the actual speed of the ship c is in the speed vector set, collision risks exist between the ship c and the towed ship a, the front towed ship b-1 or the rear towed ship b-2, and then the collision risk early warning quantification module 3 is started.
According to the method, a ship field theoretical module 2-1 and a nonlinear velocity barrier algorithm module 2-2 are combined, the dynamics of avoidance behaviors are considered, and on one hand, whether collision risks exist is judged according to whether the ship field of other ships is covered with the ship field of a towed ship, a front towed ship or a rear towed ship within a certain observation time; on the other hand, whether collision risks exist is judged according to whether the actual speed of the ship is in the speed vector set, so that whether collision risks exist between the ship and any ship in the towing system is automatically detected.
Specifically, the nonlinear velocity barrier algorithm module 2-2 obtains a velocity vector set of the collision between the ship c and the towing system through the following nonlinear velocity barrier algorithm formula,
wherein,
S NL_VO (t 0 ) Is t 0 The speed at which the other vessel c collides with the tug a, or the forward tug b-1, or the aft tug b-2,
ConfP (O, R) is all possible locations where other vessel c collides with the tug a, or the forward tug b-1, or the aft tug b-2,
P TS (x, y, t) is the motion track of the tug a, the front tug b-1 or the rear tug b-2 at the time t,
P Intr (x，y，t 0 ) Is t 0 At the moment in time the position of the other ship c,
r represents the size of the ship domain.
≧ represents a bridgefski addition operation.
Specifically, for the external collision risk detection module 2, if there is a collision risk between the other ship c and the towed ship a, or the forward towing ship b-1, or the backward towing ship b-2, that is, the collision risk index is 1; if no collision risk exists between the other ship c and the towed ship a, or the front towed ship b-1 or the rear towed ship b-2, the collision risk index is 0; the collision risk indicator is expressed as:
wherein,
IC(t 0 ) Is t 0 Time of day collisionThe risk indicator is a measure of the risk of,
V Intr (t 0 ) Is t 0 At the moment in time the speed of his ship c,
S NL_VO (t 0 ) Is t 0 The speed at which the other vessel c collides with the towed vessel a, or the front towed vessel b-1, or the rear towed vessel b-2,
and n represents crossing.
The collision risk early warning quantification module 3 comprises a ship avoidance obligation identification module 3-1, an other ship intention estimation module 3-2, an other ship motion quality evaluation module 3-3, a collision avoidance rule examination module 3-4, an other ship collision risk elimination capacity quantification module 3-5 and an early warning level quantification module 3-6.
The ship avoidance obligation identification module 3-1 is used for determining whether the ship c is a way-giving ship or not according to the international maritime collision avoidance rule, and starting the ship intention estimation module 3-2 if the ship c is the way-giving ship; if the ship c is not the way-giving ship, collision risk exists, and the early warning level quantification module 3-6 is started.
The other ship intention estimation module 3-2 is used for checking whether the other ship c takes evasive action to avoid collision, and starting the other ship movement quality evaluation module 3-3 if the other ship c takes evasive action; and if the ship c does not take the avoiding action, starting a collision risk eliminating capacity quantifying module 3-5 of the ship c.
The other ship motion quality evaluation module 3-3 is used for judging whether the avoiding action of the other ship c can effectively eliminate the collision risk, and if the avoiding action of the other ship c can effectively eliminate the collision risk, the collision avoidance rule examination module 3-4 is started; and if the avoiding action of the ship c cannot effectively eliminate the collision risk, starting an early warning level quantification module 3-6.
The collision avoidance rule examination module 3-4 is used for examining whether the avoidance action of the ship c violates the relevant avoidance action clause of the international maritime collision avoidance rule, and starting the early warning level quantification module 3-6 regardless of whether the avoidance action of the ship c violates the relevant avoidance action clause of the international maritime collision avoidance rule.
The other-ship collision risk eliminating capacity quantifying module 3-5 is used for determining the capacity of the other ship c for eliminating the collision risk according to the operation performance of the other ship c and starting the early warning level quantifying module 3-6 according to the level of the capacity of the other ship c for eliminating the collision risk.
The early warning level quantification module 3-6 is used for carrying out level quantification on external collision risks and issuing risk early warning.
Specifically, the method for the other-ship intention estimation module 3-2 to check whether the other ship c takes the avoidance action is that if the other-ship intention index is 1, the other ship c takes the avoidance action; if the intention index of the ship is 0, the ship c does not take evasive action; the other boat intention index is expressed as:
wherein,
Int(t 0 ) Is t 0 At all times, other ship intention indicators;
V Intr (t 0 ) Is t 0 At the moment in time the speed of the other vessel c,
S NL_VO (t 0 ) Is t 0 The speed at which the other vessel c collides with the towed vessel a, or the front towed vessel b-1, or the rear towed vessel b-2,
and n represents the intersection of the two points,
ΔC Intr (t 0 ) Represents t 0 The route of the other ship c changes at that moment.
Specifically, the method for the other-ship behavior quality evaluation module 3-3 to determine whether the evasive action of the other ship c can effectively eliminate the collision risk includes that if the evasive action index of the other ship c is 1, the other ship c is indicated that the evasive action can effectively eliminate the collision risk; if the avoidance action index of the other ship c is 0, the avoidance action of the other ship c is represented to be incapable of effectively eliminating the collision risk; the avoidance behavior index is expressed as:
wherein,
AQ(t 0 ) Is t 0 The evasive action index of the other ship c at the moment;
P TS (x，y，t 0 ) Is t 0 The position of the towed ship a, or the front towed ship b-1, or the rear towed ship b-2 at the moment;
P Intr (x，y，t 0 ) Is t 0 The location of other vessel c at time;
Dis(P TS (x，y，t 0 )，P Intr (x，y，t 0 ) Is t) 0 The distance between the other ship c and the towed ship a, or the front towed ship b-1, or the rear towed ship b-2 at the moment;
minDisTS represents the minimum distance at which collision risk can be eliminated with evasive action.
Specifically, the collision avoidance rule review module 3-4 reviews whether the avoidance behavior of the other ship c violates the international maritime collision avoidance rule, and if the review result index is 1, the other ship c does not violate the international maritime collision avoidance rule; if the examination result index is 0, the ship c violates the international maritime collision avoidance rule; the examination result index is expressed as:
wherein,
col is the examination result index of the international maritime collision avoidance rule,
CPA means the closest point of approach to ensure the tug a, or the forward tug b-1, or the aft tug b-2, reaches the other vessel c,
RB CPA indicating the relative orientation of his ship c as it arrives at the CPA.
Specifically, the risk elimination capability in the other-ship collision risk elimination capability quantification module 3-5 is expressed as:
wherein,
L AMM for the risk elimination capability that his ship c has,
AMM is the operational margin that other vessel c has,
AMM 1 for the upper threshold limit that other vessel c has,
AMM 2 the lower threshold that other ship c has.
If other vessel c is a small cargo ship, then AMM 1 Is 0.9 of AMM 2 Is 0.4.
Specifically, the early warning level quantification module 3-6 quantifies the external collision risk in three levels of "caution, warning, and warning", wherein the "caution" indicates that the collision risk has occurred, and the towing system as a straight ship does not allow any avoidance action to be taken, but needs to pay attention to the change situation of the current collision situation. "warning" means that the towing system as a straight vessel allows avoidance actions to be taken to eliminate conflicts, as a situation of urgency arises if no action is taken. An "alert" indicates that a reasonable evasive action should be taken to avoid a collision when the towing system is acting as either a way-giving vessel or a straight vessel.
The specific quantization standard is as follows,
if the ship c is not the way-giving ship, collision risk exists, and the collision risk level is 'alarm';
if his ship c is a yielding ship and takes evasive action (Int (t) 0 ) = 1), but the evasive action of his ship c is not effective in eliminating the collision risk (AQ = 0), the collision risk level is "alarm";
if the ship is a concessional ship and takes evasive action (Int (t) 0 ) = 1), while the avoidance behavior of the other ship c can effectively eliminate the collision risk (AQ = 1), but the avoidance behavior of the other ship c violates the action clause of international maritime collision avoidance rule (Col = 0), the collision risk level is "warning";
if he ship is a way-giving ship and takes evasive action (Int (t) 0 ) = 1), while the avoidance behavior of the other ship c can effectively eliminate the collision risk (AQ = 1), and in addition, the avoidance behavior of the other ship c complies with the action clause of international maritime collision avoidance rule (Col = 1), the collision risk level is "caution";
if the ship is a passing ship and no evasive action is taken (Int (t) 0 ) = 0), determining the collision risk level matched with the collision risk elimination capability of the other ship c according to the collision risk elimination capability quantification module 3-5 of the other ship, wherein the specific method is as follows: high capability of eliminating collision risk if other ship c is in collision (L) AMM = H), the collision risk level is "caution", if his ship c has moderate collision risk elimination capability (L) AMM = M), the collision risk level is "warning", if the collision risk elimination capability of the other ship c is low (L) AMM = L), the collision risk level is "alarm".
The flow chart of the present invention for quantifying the external collision risk level is shown in fig. 8.
Case analysis was performed as follows.
Fig. 2a shows a meeting scenario when t =1s, where IC =1 indicates a collision risk, but Int =0 indicates that the ship c-1 is not taking evasive action, and then L is equal to L according to the fifth risk level quantification criterion AMM When = H, i.e. his ship c-1 has a high collision risk elimination capability, the collision risk level is "caution", see fig. 4. In the next 100s, his ship c-1 is still sailing straight at a constant speed and is constantly approaching the towing system, see fig. 3.
Fig. 2b is a meeting scene when t =100s, IC =1 indicates a collision risk, int =0 indicates that the ship c-1 does not take evasive action, and L =0 indicates that the ship is not in a collision state AMM If M, i.e., if the collision risk elimination capability of the ship c-1 is moderate, the collision risk level is "warning" according to the fifth risk level quantification criterion, as shown in fig. 4. At this point, the towing system is allowed to take evasive action to ensure safe passage.
Fig. 2c is a meeting scene when t =120s, IC =1 indicates that there is a collision risk, int =1 indicates that the ship c-1 takes evasive action, whereas AQ =0 indicates that the evasive maneuver adopted by the ship c-1 is poor, i.e., the evasive action of the ship c-1 cannot effectively eliminate the collision risk, and then the collision risk level is "alarm" according to the second risk level quantification criterion, as shown in fig. 4.
Fig. 2d shows a meeting scenario when t =150s, IC =1 indicates a collision risk, int =1 indicates that the ship c-1 takes evasive action, whereas AQ =0 indicates that the evasive action of the ship c cannot effectively eliminate the collision risk, and then the collision risk level is "alarm" according to the second risk level quantification criterion, as shown in fig. 4.
Fig. 2e shows a meeting scenario when t =240s, IC =1 indicates a collision risk, but Int =0 indicates that the ship c-1 does not take evasive action, and then L is equal to L according to the fifth risk level quantification criterion AMM When = L, i.e., his ship c-1 has low collision risk elimination capability, the collision risk level is "alarm", see fig. 4. At this time, the distance between the other ship c-1 and the towed ship a, or the front towed ship b-1, or the rear towed ship b-2 is reduced to a minimum value, and as shown in FIG. 3, the ship domain of the other ship c-1 overlaps with the ship domain of the towed ship a, or the front towed ship b-1, or the rear towed ship b-2.
Fig. 2f shows a meeting scenario when t =300s, where IC =1 indicates a collision risk, but Int =0 indicates that the ship c-1 is not taking evasive action, and then L is equal to L according to the fifth risk level quantification criterion AMM And L, i.e. the collision risk elimination capability of his ship c-1 is low, the collision risk level is "alarm", see fig. 4.
As can be seen from fig. 2a to 2f, when the ship in the towing system meets the other ship c-1, the collision risk exists in the whole meeting process, and a dangerous close meeting occurs between the towing system and the other ship c-1 due to the poor maneuvering efficiency of the other ship c-1.
The change of the detection and early warning parameters of the towing system with time in case 1 is shown in table 3.
TABLE 3 variation of various detection and early warning parameters of the towing system with time
| Time:s | IC | Int | AQ | Col | L AMM | CAL |
| 10 | 1 | 0 | / | / | 0.9143 | Care is taken that |
| 20 | 1 | 0 | / | / | 0.9143 | Care is taken that |
| 30 | 1 | 0 | / | / | 0.9143 | Care is taken that |
| 40 | 1 | 0 | / | / | 0.9143 | Care is taken that |
| 50 | 1 | 0 | / | / | 0.9143 | Care is taken |
| 60 | 1 | 0 | / | / | 0.9143 | Care is taken |
| 70 | 1 | 0 | / | / | 0.9143 | Care is taken that |
| 80 | 1 | 0 | / | / | 0.9 | Warning |
| 90 | 1 | 0 | / | / | 0.8857 | Warning |
| 100 | 1 | 0 | / | / | 0.7286 | Warning |
| 110 | 1 | 1 | 0 | / | / | Alarm device |
| 120 | 1 | 1 | 0 | / | / | Alarm device |
| 130 | 1 | 1 | 0 | / | / | Alarm device |
| 140 | 1 | 1 | 0 | / | / | Alarm device |
| 150 | 1 | 1 | 0 | / | / | Alarm device |
| 160 | 1 | 1 | 0 | / | / | Alarm device |
| 170 | 1 | 0 | / | / | 0 | Alarm device |
| 180 | 1 | 0 | / | / | 0 | Alarm device |
| 190 | 1 | 0 | / | / | 0 | Alarm device |
| 200 | 1 | 0 | / | / | 0 | Alarm device |
| 210 | 1 | 0 | / | / | 0 | Alarm device |
| 220 | 1 | 0 | / | / | 0 | Alarm device |
| 230 | 1 | 0 | / | / | 0 | Alarm device |
| 240 | 1 | 0 | / | / | 0 | Alarm device |
| 250 | 1 | 0 | / | / | 0 | Alarm device |
| 260 | 1 | 0 | / | / | 0 | Alarm device |
| 270 | 1 | 0 | / | / | 0 | Alarm device |
| 280 | 1 | 0 | / | / | 0 | Alarm device |
| 290 | 1 | 0 | / | / | 0 | Alarm device |
| 300 | 1 | 0 | / | / | 0 | Alarm device |
At 300 seconds, the towing system creates a risk of collision with other vessels. Since his ship c-2 takes no collision avoidance action to avoid collision (Int (t) 0 ) = 0), but at this time its risk elimination capacity is high L AMM H, so the warning level is marked as "caution" (see fig. 5 a). Before 380 seconds, his ship c-2 approaches the towing system continuously at a constant speed and heading (see fig. 6). At 340 seconds, the risk of collision still exists, and the risk-elimination capability of his ship c-2 is reduced, but still at a higher level L AMM H, so the warning level is "caution" (see fig. 5 b). At 370 seconds, there is a risk of collision, but the risk-eliminating capacity of his ship c-2 drops to a medium level L AMM = M, the warning level is therefore marked as "warning" (see fig. 5 c). From 390 seconds to 520 seconds, his ship c-2 turns starboard to avoid a collision. Through action quality evaluation and COLREGs examination, the collision avoidance actions adopted by the ship c-2 are judged to be effective and accord with the COLREGs. At 420 seconds, the distance between his ship, c-2, and the tug is reduced to about 19 meters (FIG. 6). The warning level is reduced to "caution" (see fig. 5 d) considering that the collision can be eliminated only by the collision avoidance action taken by his ship c-2. The risk of collision is eliminated at 470 seconds due to the effective collision avoidance action taken by his vessel c-2, see fig. 7. The towing system and other vessel c-2 are close until 590 seconds. At 590 seconds, his vessel c-2 and the tug reach the Closest Point of Approach (CPA), and their distance is reduced to a minimum of 7.38m (FIG. 6), at safe distance. After 590 seconds, the distance between them increases.
The change of the detection and early warning parameters of the towing system with time in the above case 2 is shown in table 4.
TABLE 4 variation of detection and early warning parameters of towing system with time
The external collision risk early warning system of the ship towing system under the mutual condition can automatically detect whether collision risk exists between other ships and any ship in the towing system, can issue collision risk early warnings in different levels when collision risk exists, reminds towing operators to take reasonable avoidance measures to ensure towing safety of the towing system, does not need to take traffic restrictions on ships around the towing system, and does not reduce the utilization rate of a navigation channel.
The above embodiments are preferred embodiments of the present invention, but the present invention is not limited to the above embodiments, and any other changes, modifications, substitutions, combinations, and simplifications which do not depart from the spirit and principle of the present invention should be construed as equivalents thereof, and all such changes, modifications, substitutions, combinations, and simplifications are intended to be included in the scope of the present invention.
Claims (4)
1. The utility model provides an external collision risk early warning system of boats and ships dragging system under mutual condition, its characterized in that: the system comprises an information collection module (1), an external collision risk detection module (2) and a collision risk early warning quantification module (3);
the information collection module (1) is used for collecting the sailing track of a towed ship (a), the basic ship information of the towed ship (a), the basic ship information of a front towed ship (b-1), the basic ship information of a rear towed ship (b-2) and the basic ship information and sailing information of other ships (c) around the towing system in the towing system under the environment interference;
the external collision risk detection module (2) is used for judging whether collision risks exist between the towing system and other ships (c) according to the ship field theoretical module (2-1) and the nonlinear speed barrier algorithm module (2-2);
the ship field theoretical module (2-1) is used for judging whether collision risks exist according to whether the ship field of the other ship (c) is covered with the ship field of the towed ship (a), the front towed ship (b-1) or the rear towed ship (b-2) within a certain observation time, and if the ship field of the other ship (c) is not intersected with the ship field of the towed ship (a), the front towed ship (b-1) or the rear towed ship (b-2), the other ship (c) does not have collision risks with a towing system; if the ship field of the other ship (c) is intersected with the ship field of the towed ship (a), the front towed ship (b-1) or the rear towed ship (b-2), the other ship (c) and the towing system have collision risks, and then a collision risk early warning quantification module (3) is started;
the nonlinear velocity barrier algorithm module (2-2) is used for obtaining a velocity vector set of collision between the other ship (c) and the towing system according to the position of the other ship (c) and the sailing track of each ship in the towing system; if the actual speed of the other ship (c) is out of the speed vector set, no collision risk exists between the other ship (c) and the towed ship (a), or the front towed ship (b-1), or the rear towed ship (b-2); if the actual speed of the other ship (c) is in the speed vector set, the collision risk exists between the other ship (c) and the towed ship (a), or between the front towed ship (b-1) or between the rear towed ship (b-2), and then a collision risk early warning quantification module (3) is started;
the collision risk early warning quantification module (3) comprises a ship avoidance obligation identification module (3-1), an other ship intention estimation module (3-2), an other ship motion quality evaluation module (3-3), a collision prevention rule examination module (3-4), an other ship collision risk elimination capacity quantification module (3-5) and an early warning level quantification module (3-6);
the ship avoidance obligation identification module (3-1) is used for determining whether the ship (c) is a way-giving ship or not through the international maritime collision avoidance rule, and if the ship (c) is the way-giving ship, the ship intention estimation module (3-2) is started; if the other ship (c) is not the way-giving ship, collision risk exists, and an early warning level quantification module (3-6) is started;
the other ship intention estimation module (3-2) is used for checking whether the other ship (c) takes evasive action to avoid collision, and if the other ship (c) takes evasive action, the other ship movement quality evaluation module (3-3) is started; if the other ship (c) does not take evasive action, starting a collision risk elimination capability quantification module (3-5) of the other ship;
the method that the other ship intention estimation module (3-2) checks whether the other ship (c) takes the avoiding action is that if the other ship intention index is 1, the other ship (c) is indicated to take the avoiding action; if the other boat intention index is 0, indicating that the other boat (c) does not take evasive action; the other boat intention index is expressed as:
wherein,
Int(t 0 ) Is t 0 At the moment, the index of the intention of other ships,
V Intr (t 0 ) Is t 0 The speed of the other vessel (c) at that moment,
S NL_VO (t 0 ) Is t 0 The speed at which the other vessel (c) collides with the trailing vessel (a), the forward trailing vessel (b-1), or the aft trailing vessel (b-2),
and n represents the intersection of the two points,
ΔC Intr (t 0 ) Represents t 0 The route change of the other vessel (c) at the moment;
the other ship motion quality evaluation module (3-3) is used for judging whether the avoiding action of the other ship (c) can effectively eliminate the collision risk or not, and if the avoiding action of the other ship (c) can effectively eliminate the collision risk, the collision avoidance rule examination module (3-4) is started; if the evasive action of the other ship (c) can not effectively eliminate the collision risk, starting an early warning level quantification module (3-6); the method for judging whether the evasive action of the other ship (c) can effectively eliminate the collision risk by the other ship motion quality evaluation module (3-3) is that if the evasive action index of the other ship (c) is 1, the evasive action of the other ship (c) can effectively eliminate the collision risk; if the avoidance behavior index of the other ship (c) is 0, the avoidance behavior index indicates that the avoidance behavior of the other ship (c) cannot effectively eliminate the collision risk; the avoidance behavior index is expressed as:
wherein,
AQ(t 0 ) Is t 0 An avoidance behavior index of the other ship (c) at the time,
P TS (x，y，t 0 ) Is t 0 The position of the trailing vessel (a), or the leading vessel (b-1), or the trailing vessel (b-2) at that time,
P Intr (x，y，t 0 ) Is t 0 At the moment of time the position of the other vessel (c),
Dis(P TS (x，y，t 0 )，P Intr (x，y，t 0 ) Is t) 0 The distance between the other vessel (c) and the towed vessel (a), or the forward towing vessel (b-1), or the backward towing vessel (b-2) at the time,
minDisTS represents the minimum distance at which collision risk can be eliminated by adopting evasive action;
the collision avoidance rule examination module (3-4) is used for examining whether the avoidance action of the other ship (c) violates relevant avoidance action terms of the international maritime collision avoidance rule, and the early warning level quantification module (3-6) is started no matter whether the avoidance action of the other ship (c) violates the relevant avoidance action terms of the international maritime collision avoidance rule;
the collision avoidance rule examination module (3-4) examines whether the avoiding action of the other ship (c) violates the international maritime collision avoidance rule, namely if the examination result index is 1, the other ship (c) does not violate the international maritime collision avoidance rule; if the examination result index is 0, the ship (c) violates the international maritime collision avoidance rule; the examination result index is expressed as:
wherein,
col is the examination result index of the International rules for avoiding collision at sea,
CPA denotes the closest point of approach to ensure arrival of the tow vessel (a), or the forward tow vessel (b-1), or the aft tow vessel (b-2) with another vessel (c),
RB CPA indicating the relative orientation of the other vessel (c) when it arrives at the CPA;
the other ship collision risk elimination capacity quantification module (3-5) is used for determining the capacity of the other ship (c) for eliminating collision risk according to the operation performance of the other ship (c), and starting the early warning level quantification module (3-6) according to the level of the capacity of the other ship (c) for eliminating collision risk;
the risk elimination capability in the other ship collision risk elimination capability quantification module (3-5) is expressed as:
wherein,
L AMM for the risk elimination capability that other vessels (c) have,
AMM is the operational margin that other vessels (c) have,
AMM 1 for the upper threshold limit that other vessels (c) have,
AMM 2 a lower threshold for other vessels (c);
the early warning level quantification module (3-6) is used for carrying out level quantification on external collision risks and issuing risk early warning;
the early warning level quantification module (3-6) quantifies three levels of 'caution, warning and alarm' for the external collision risk, the concrete quantification standard is,
if the ship (c) is not a yielding ship, collision risks exist, and the collision risk level is 'alarm';
if the other ship (c) is a concessional ship and takes evasive action, but the evasive action of the other ship (c) cannot effectively eliminate the collision risk, the collision risk level is "alarm";
if the other ship is a way-giving ship and takes evasive action, and the evasive action of the other ship (c) can effectively eliminate the collision risk, but the evasive action of the other ship (c) violates the action clause of the international maritime collision avoidance rule, the collision risk level is 'warning';
if the ship (c) is a way-giving ship and takes evasive action, the evasive action of the ship (c) can effectively eliminate the collision risk, and the evasive action of the ship (c) complies with action terms of International rules for avoiding collision at sea, the collision risk level is 'careful';
if the ship is a leaving road ship and does not take evasive action, determining a collision risk level matched with the collision risk eliminating capability of the ship (c) according to a collision risk eliminating capability quantification module (3-5) of the ship, wherein the specific method comprises the following steps: the collision risk level is "caution" if the collision risk elimination capability of his ship (c) is high, "warning" if the collision risk elimination capability of his ship (c) is medium, and "alarm" if the collision risk elimination capability of his ship (c) is low.
2. The external collision risk early warning system of a mutual encounter situation vessel towing system as claimed in claim 1, wherein: the nonlinear velocity barrier algorithm module (2-2) obtains a velocity vector set of the collision of the other ship (c) and the towing system through the following nonlinear velocity barrier algorithm formula,
wherein,
S NL_VO (t 0 ) Is t 0 The speed at which the other vessel (c) collides with the trailing vessel (a), the forward trailing vessel (b-1), or the aft trailing vessel (b-2),
ConfP (O, R) is all possible locations where the other vessel (c) collides with the towed vessel (a), or the forward towing vessel (b-1), or the aft towing vessel (b-2),
P TS (x, y, t) is the position of the trailing vessel (a), or the forward trailing vessel (b-1), or the aft trailing vessel (b-2) at time t,
P Intr (x，y，t 0 ) Is t 0 At the moment of time the position of the other vessel (c),
r represents the size of the ship's field,
≧ represents a threshold Kevski addition operation.
3. The mutual encounter external collision risk early warning system of a ship towing system as claimed in claim 2, wherein: for the external collision risk detection module (2), if collision risks exist between the other ship (c) and the towed ship (a), or the front towed ship (b-1), or the rear towed ship (b-2), namely the collision risk index is 1; if no collision risk exists between the other ship (c) and the towed ship (a), or the front towed ship (b-1), or the rear towed ship (b-2), namely the collision risk index is 0; the collision risk indicator is expressed as:
wherein,
IC(t 0 ) Is t 0 The impact risk indicator at the moment in time,
V Intr (t 0 ) Is t 0 The speed of the other vessel (c) at that moment,
S NL_VO (t 0 ) Is t 0 The speed at which the other vessel (c) collides with the trailing vessel (a), the forward trailing vessel (b-1), or the aft trailing vessel (b-2),
and n represents crossing.
4. The external collision risk early warning system of a marine towing system in mutual encounter according to claim 1, wherein: if the other vessel (c) is a small cargo vessel, AMM 1 Is 0.9 of AMM 2 Is 0.4.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210947818.9A CN115019561B (en) | 2022-08-09 | 2022-08-09 | External collision risk early warning system of ship towing system under mutual-seeing condition |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210947818.9A CN115019561B (en) | 2022-08-09 | 2022-08-09 | External collision risk early warning system of ship towing system under mutual-seeing condition |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN115019561A CN115019561A (en) | 2022-09-06 |
| CN115019561B true CN115019561B (en) | 2022-12-23 |
Family
ID=83065718
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210947818.9A Active CN115019561B (en) | 2022-08-09 | 2022-08-09 | External collision risk early warning system of ship towing system under mutual-seeing condition |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN115019561B (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN115843009B (en) * | 2023-02-16 | 2023-05-12 | 中交第一航务工程局有限公司 | Method and system for synchronizing data between immersed tube installation ship and tug |
Citations (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4281326A (en) * | 1976-04-27 | 1981-07-28 | Anderson Lawrence F | Automatic collision warning target display system |
| CN105185162A (en) * | 2015-10-26 | 2015-12-23 | 中国电子科技集团公司第二十八研究所 | AIS information-based multi-target anti-collision warning method |
| WO2017167905A1 (en) * | 2016-03-31 | 2017-10-05 | A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S | A boat or ship with a collision prevention system |
| WO2020067744A1 (en) * | 2018-09-27 | 2020-04-02 | (주)지엠티 | Internet-based automatic identification system and method |
| CN111158381A (en) * | 2020-01-19 | 2020-05-15 | 中电科（宁波）海洋电子研究院有限公司 | Unmanned ship obstacle avoidance method with long towing line array |
| CN111709633A (en) * | 2020-06-09 | 2020-09-25 | 吉林大学 | Method, device and equipment for determining collision risk degree and storable medium |
| CN111709571A (en) * | 2020-06-09 | 2020-09-25 | 吉林大学 | Ship collision avoidance route determining method, device, equipment and storage medium |
| CN111833657A (en) * | 2020-06-28 | 2020-10-27 | 武汉理工大学 | Ship collision avoidance method, system and storage medium |
| CN113436466A (en) * | 2021-06-21 | 2021-09-24 | 中国舰船研究设计中心 | Verification and evaluation method for intelligent navigation collision avoidance efficiency of ship |
| CN114387824A (en) * | 2022-01-13 | 2022-04-22 | 上海大学 | Collision-prevention steering judgment method conforming to international maritime collision-prevention rule |
Family Cites Families (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102147981B (en) * | 2010-12-20 | 2014-01-15 | 成都天奥信息科技有限公司 | Method for warning of warning region of shipborne automatic identification system |
| KR101703906B1 (en) * | 2015-01-22 | 2017-02-08 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Vessel monitoring system and vessel monitoring method thereof |
| JP7080320B2 (en) * | 2018-06-27 | 2022-06-03 | 古野電気株式会社 | Collision warning device and collision warning method |
| CN113671968B (en) * | 2021-08-25 | 2023-12-12 | 大连海事大学 | Real-time collision prevention method for unmanned surface vessel |
| CN114241813B (en) * | 2021-12-27 | 2024-07-09 | 中海电信有限公司 | Collision prevention early warning method, system and device between ships |
-
2022
- 2022-08-09 CN CN202210947818.9A patent/CN115019561B/en active Active
Patent Citations (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4281326A (en) * | 1976-04-27 | 1981-07-28 | Anderson Lawrence F | Automatic collision warning target display system |
| CN105185162A (en) * | 2015-10-26 | 2015-12-23 | 中国电子科技集团公司第二十八研究所 | AIS information-based multi-target anti-collision warning method |
| WO2017167905A1 (en) * | 2016-03-31 | 2017-10-05 | A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S | A boat or ship with a collision prevention system |
| WO2020067744A1 (en) * | 2018-09-27 | 2020-04-02 | (주)지엠티 | Internet-based automatic identification system and method |
| CN111158381A (en) * | 2020-01-19 | 2020-05-15 | 中电科（宁波）海洋电子研究院有限公司 | Unmanned ship obstacle avoidance method with long towing line array |
| CN111709633A (en) * | 2020-06-09 | 2020-09-25 | 吉林大学 | Method, device and equipment for determining collision risk degree and storable medium |
| CN111709571A (en) * | 2020-06-09 | 2020-09-25 | 吉林大学 | Ship collision avoidance route determining method, device, equipment and storage medium |
| CN111833657A (en) * | 2020-06-28 | 2020-10-27 | 武汉理工大学 | Ship collision avoidance method, system and storage medium |
| CN113436466A (en) * | 2021-06-21 | 2021-09-24 | 中国舰船研究设计中心 | Verification and evaluation method for intelligent navigation collision avoidance efficiency of ship |
| CN114387824A (en) * | 2022-01-13 | 2022-04-22 | 上海大学 | Collision-prevention steering judgment method conforming to international maritime collision-prevention rule |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN115019561A (en) | 2022-09-06 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN108873799B (en) | Shipborne intelligent driving auxiliary terminal | |
| Qu et al. | Ship collision risk assessment for the Singapore Strait | |
| Du et al. | A COLREG-compliant ship collision alert system for stand-on vessels | |
| Iperen | Classifying ship encounters to monitor traffic safety on the North Sea from AIS data | |
| Chen et al. | A research on AIS-based embedded system for ship collision avoidance | |
| CN115019561B (en) | External collision risk early warning system of ship towing system under mutual-seeing condition | |
| Shu et al. | Vessel speed, course, and path analysis in the Botlek area of the Port of Rotterdam, Netherlands | |
| KR102269676B1 (en) | Device and method for Auto vessel collision prevention | |
| CN111815120A (en) | Water traffic risk assessment method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| Zhou et al. | Navigation safety domain and collision risk index for decision support of collision avoidance of USVs | |
| Zhang et al. | A data-driven approach for ship-bridge collision candidate detection in bridge waterway | |
| Zhao et al. | Decision-making for the autonomous navigation of USVs based on deep reinforcement learning under IALA maritime buoyage system | |
| Zhang et al. | A method of performing real-time ship conflict probability ranking in open waters based on AIS data | |
| CN113112871B (en) | Ship-bridge collision risk calculation method considering ship dimension | |
| Zhou et al. | Ship behavior during encounters in ports and waterways based on AIS data: From theoretical definitions to empirical findings | |
| Zhao et al. | A method for correcting the closest point of approach index during vessel encounters based on dimension data from AIS | |
| Miyake et al. | Safety assessment for establishing ships' routeing: Recommended route off the western coast of Izu O Shima Island | |
| CN110164186A (en) | Ship passes through confluence waters auxiliary collision avoidance system and method | |
| Hagen et al. | Exploration of COLREG-relevant parameters from historical AIS-data | |
| Qin et al. | Dynamic risk prewarning in ship encounter process considering domain violation | |
| Shimizu | Recent trends and issues for practical application of MASS | |
| Sawada et al. | Framework of safety evaluation and scenarios for automatic collision avoidance algorithm | |
| Rong et al. | Statistical analysis of collision risk indicators in ship evasive manoeuvres | |
| Zhang et al. | Collision prevention of ship towing operation under environmental disturbance | |
| CN116087984B (en) | Work ship anticollision platform based on laser radar |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| CB03 | Change of inventor or designer information | ||
| CB03 | Change of inventor or designer information |
Inventor after: Zhang Lei Inventor after: Li Xiaobin Inventor after: Wang Dakun Inventor after: Liu Wenjie Inventor after: Du Lei Inventor after: Ma Yong Inventor after: Gan Langxiong Inventor before: Zhang Lei Inventor before: Li Xiaobin Inventor before: Wang Dakun Inventor before: Liu Wenjie Inventor before: Du Lei Inventor before: Ma Yong Inventor before: Gan Langxiong |