CN114999641A - Tunnel worker post test method and system - Google Patents
Tunnel worker post test method and system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN114999641A CN114999641A CN202210586256.XA CN202210586256A CN114999641A CN 114999641 A CN114999641 A CN 114999641A CN 202210586256 A CN202210586256 A CN 202210586256A CN 114999641 A CN114999641 A CN 114999641A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- safety
- testee
- score
- tunnel
- scale
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 title claims description 6
- 230000019771 cognition Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 50
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 33
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 24
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 15
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 claims description 15
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 claims description 15
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 15
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 claims description 15
- 230000003340 mental effect Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000003245 coal Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 210000004072 lung Anatomy 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000006998 cognitive state Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005314 correlation function Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003064 k means clustering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000803 paradoxical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000037081 physical activity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
- G16H50/00—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics
- G16H50/30—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics for calculating health indices; for individual health risk assessment
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/02—Detecting, measuring or recording pulse, heart rate, blood pressure or blood flow; Combined pulse/heart-rate/blood pressure determination; Evaluating a cardiovascular condition not otherwise provided for, e.g. using combinations of techniques provided for in this group with electrocardiography or electroauscultation; Heart catheters for measuring blood pressure
- A61B5/0205—Simultaneously evaluating both cardiovascular conditions and different types of body conditions, e.g. heart and respiratory condition
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/16—Devices for psychotechnics; Testing reaction times ; Devices for evaluating the psychological state
- A61B5/165—Evaluating the state of mind, e.g. depression, anxiety
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/16—Devices for psychotechnics; Testing reaction times ; Devices for evaluating the psychological state
- A61B5/18—Devices for psychotechnics; Testing reaction times ; Devices for evaluating the psychological state for vehicle drivers or machine operators
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/72—Signal processing specially adapted for physiological signals or for diagnostic purposes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06398—Performance of employee with respect to a job function
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B2503/00—Evaluating a particular growth phase or type of persons or animals
- A61B2503/20—Workers
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- Surgery (AREA)
- Psychiatry (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Physiology (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Child & Adolescent Psychology (AREA)
- Developmental Disabilities (AREA)
- Educational Technology (AREA)
- Hospice & Palliative Care (AREA)
- Psychology (AREA)
- Social Psychology (AREA)
- Cardiology (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Pulmonology (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a method and a system for testing the post status of tunnel constructors, which are used for detecting the post status of tunnel constructors based on a mode of combining subjective evaluation and objective detection, wherein the post status of tunnel constructors is objectively evaluated by using a vital capacity detector, a pulse sensor and an electrocardiograph to test pre-post physiological data, and if an objective evaluation index is out of a normal range value, the tunnel constructors are considered to be not suitable for post installation; and the subjective evaluation analyzes the psychological load state and the safety cognition level of the tunnel constructors according to the psychological load measuring scale and the safety cognition measuring scale and the characteristics of the tunnel construction industry, and a comprehensive safety evaluation score is calculated by using a comprehensive evaluation system after the steps are finished to determine whether the post-construction is allowed or not. The method can effectively evaluate the psychological load, the safety cognitive state and the physical state of tunnel constructors before the tunnel constructors are on duty, and visualize the physical state data before the duty, thereby reducing the human factor proportion in the tunnel accident reason on the whole and ensuring the safety of workers.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of tunnel construction safety, and particularly relates to a method and a system for testing a tunnel constructor before post.
Background
With the proposal of the strategy of the strong country of transportation in recent years, the domestic traffic construction is developed vigorously, the underground development and utilization in the 21 st century are unprecedented, and China becomes the world with the largest quantity, the most complex and the fastest development of tunnel engineering. The development process of the tunnel is accelerated continuously, however, due to the semi-closed characteristic of the tunnel construction, a plurality of potential safety hazards exist, tunnel construction accidents are easy to cause, and casualties and property loss are caused. Research on analysis of causes of accidents may reveal that unsafe behaviors of tunnel workers have become the most dominant factor over technical defects, and the most fundamental cause of accidents is unsafe behaviors resulting from failure of safety awareness of constructors. Therefore, how to perform the pre-post test before the tunnel workers are on post to prevent the safety accidents from human factors and physiological levels becomes a technical problem to be solved urgently.
The existing constructor post test mainly tests from the perspective of safety psychology and psychological load, including personality test, ability and non-ability test, interest and hobbies test and the like, although the basic personality characteristics and interest and hobbies of constructors can be better reflected, the constructor can not be qualified or not from the perspective of safety cognition. At present, a measuring method based on a subjective scale and physiological index combined before-post test is not formed in the field of tunnel construction. Therefore, it is very necessary to research an effective method for testing the state of the constructor before the post in order to reduce safety accidents caused by the human and to ensure the safety of the constructor.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention provides a method and a system for testing a tunnel constructor before post, which can effectively evaluate the psychological load, the safety cognitive state and the physical state of the tunnel constructor before post, and visualize the physical state data before post, thereby reducing the human factor proportion in the tunnel accident reason on the whole and ensuring the safety of workers.
On one hand, in order to achieve the aim, the invention provides a method for testing the tunnel constructor before post, which comprises the following steps:
acquiring identity information of a testee;
acquiring physiological characteristic parameters of a testee;
acquiring the psychological load level of a testee;
acquiring the safety cognition level of a testee;
comprehensively calculating a subjective safety evaluation score according to the normalized psychological load score and the normalized safety cognition score;
and comparing the final physiological parameters with the subjective safety evaluation score threshold value to judge whether the testee is allowed to work.
Optionally, the obtaining of the physical fatigue level of the subject comprises: the vital capacity, heart rate, blood oxygen and electrocardiogram of a testee are collected.
According to the lung capacity, heart rate, blood oxygen, electrocardiogram, pulse rate, index value and professional data and the comparison of the normal range of the indexes preset in the detector, whether the physiological index parameters of the testee meet the standard range is determined, and whether the tunnel workers are on duty is considered from the physiological parameters.
Optionally, the comprehensively calculating the subjective safety assessment score according to the psychological load score and the safety cognition score comprises:
carrying out standardization processing on the psychological load score and the safety cognition score;
using an AHP analytic hierarchy process to assign weights to the psychological load and the safety cognition two aspect pairs;
and weighting the data standardized by the safety cognition by using an entropy method, and calculating a final subjective safety evaluation score by using a comprehensive data processing module.
On the other hand, in order to achieve the above object, the present invention provides a system for testing a tunnel constructor before post, comprising:
the identity information acquisition module is used for acquiring the identity information of the testee;
the physiological information acquisition module is used for acquiring vital capacity, heart rate, blood oxygen and electrocardiogram of the testee;
the psychological load level acquisition module is used for acquiring the psychological load of the testee;
the safety cognition level acquisition module is used for acquiring the safety cognition level of the testee;
the data comprehensive processing module is used for calculating scores of the psychological load scale and the safety cognition scale of the testee and obtaining a comprehensive score according to the score data;
the main control system is respectively connected with the identity information acquisition module, the physiological information acquisition module, the psychological load level acquisition module, the safety cognition level acquisition module and the data comprehensive processing module;
the output module is respectively connected with the physiological information acquisition module and the data comprehensive processing module and is used for judging whether the testee is allowed to go on duty.
Optionally, the physiological information acquiring module includes:
the vital capacity detection module is used for collecting the vital capacity of the testee;
the heart rate and blood oxygen detection module is used for acquiring heart rate information of a testee and acquiring the heart rate and the blood oxygen saturation according to the pulse sensor;
the electrocardiogram detection module is used for acquiring the electrocardiogram of the testee;
optionally, the mental load level obtaining module includes:
the data acquisition module is used for acquiring information in a psychological load scale finished by a testee, wherein the psychological load scale is a tunnel worker psychological load scale designed based on a national aeronautical administration workload scale (NASA-TLX);
and the calculating module is used for calculating the SCOREs of the psychological load scale of the testee and normalizing the data by using a Z-SCORE method.
Optionally, the security awareness level obtaining module includes:
the data acquisition module is used for acquiring information in a safety cognition measurement scale finished by a testee, wherein the safety cognition measurement scale is a tunnel worker safety cognition scale developed based on a coal mine worker safety cognition scale and combined with tunnel construction characteristics;
and the calculation module is used for calculating the SCORE of the safety cognition measurement table of the testee and normalizing the data by using a Z-SCORE method.
The first processing module is connected with the vital capacity detection module, the heart rate and blood oxygen detection module and the electrocardio detection module and is used for determining the physical state of the testee according to the vital capacity, the heart rate, the blood oxygen and the electrocardiogram;
the second processing module is used for carrying out standardized processing on the tunnel worker psychological load scale and the safety cognition scale;
the third processing module is used for giving weight to psychological load and data standardized by safety cognition by using an analytic hierarchy process;
and the fourth processing module gives weight to six dimensions of the NASA-TLX by utilizing an entropy method for the security cognition scale.
Optionally, the physiological information detection module comprises a vital capacity detector, a pulse sensor and an electrocardiograph, and the instrument can automatically select an existing mature device according to market demands.
The invention has the technical effects that: the invention detects the pre-post state of tunnel workers based on a mode of combining subjective evaluation and objective detection, the pre-post physiological data test is carried out by utilizing a vital capacity detector, a pulse sensor and an electrocardiograph for objective evaluation, and if the objective evaluation index is out of a normal range value, the tunnel workers are considered to be not suitable for post-post; and the subjective evaluation analyzes the psychological load state and the safety cognition level of the tunnel constructors according to the psychological load measuring scale and the safety cognition measuring scale and the characteristics of the tunnel construction industry, and a comprehensive safety evaluation score is calculated by using a comprehensive evaluation system after the steps are finished to determine whether the post-construction is allowed or not. By adopting the technical scheme, the health state and the psychological state of tunnel construction personnel can be more comprehensively evaluated before the tunnel construction personnel are on duty, the body state data before the duty is visualized, and the safety of tunnel construction is guaranteed while the probability of accidents caused by people in the tunnel construction process is reduced.
Drawings
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this application, are included to provide a further understanding of the application, and the description of the exemplary embodiments of the application are intended to be illustrative of the application and are not intended to limit the application. In the drawings:
fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of a tunnel worker post test method and system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this application, illustrate embodiments of the application and, together with the description, serve to explain the application and are not intended to limit the application. In the drawings:
fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of a tunnel worker post test method and system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Example one
The embodiment provides a method and a system for testing a tunnel worker before post, which comprises the following steps:
the identity information acquisition module is used for acquiring the identity information of the testee, and in the embodiment, the identity information acquisition module comprises a name, a gender, an age, a working age, a culture degree and a working position;
the physiological information acquisition module is used for acquiring the vital capacity, the heart rate, the blood oxygen and the electrocardiogram of the testee;
the psychological load level acquisition module is used for acquiring the psychological load of the testee;
the safety cognition level acquisition module is used for acquiring the safety cognition level of the testee;
the data comprehensive processing module is used for calculating scores of the psychological load scale and the safety cognition scale of the testee and obtaining a comprehensive score according to the score data;
the main control system is respectively connected with the identity information acquisition module, the physiological information acquisition module, the psychological load level acquisition module, the safety cognition level acquisition module and the data comprehensive processing module;
the output module is respectively connected with the physiological information acquisition module and the data comprehensive processing module and is used for judging whether the testee is allowed to go on duty.
The physiological information acquisition module is used for comparing index values of vital capacity, heart rate, blood oxygen and electrocardiogram with professional data and a normal range preset with the indexes in the detector according to investigation to determine whether the physiological index parameters of the testee meet the standard range, and considering that the tunnel worker is not allowed to go on duty or is suspended to go on duty if the physiological index parameters are not in the normal range.
Further optimizing the scheme, the mental load level obtaining module and the safety cognition level obtaining module comprise:
the data acquisition module is used for acquiring information in a psychological load scale and a safety cognition scale finished by a testee, wherein the psychological load scale is a tunnel worker psychological load scale and a tunnel worker safety cognition scale; the application process of the NASA-TLX method comprises 2 steps:
(1) the status of the 6 factors of NASA-TLX are evaluated separately for the actual operational scenario. The NASA-TLX evaluation method requires that the operator gives his own evaluation according to the actual situation, based on 6 factors of psychological load, after completing a certain task. In addition to the performance factor, the other 5 factors are that the higher the feeling is, the higher the score is; only for performance, the better the performance is perceived, the lower the score is given.
(2) And evaluating the relative importance of each factor in the mental load stroke by adopting a pairwise comparison method. The sum of the weights of the 6 factors for NASA-TLX equals 1. Two by two comparisons are made, for example, gets 1 point at a time, 5 points at most can be obtained, and the final weight is N/15(N is the number of wins). Where paradoxical assessments (i.e., A more important than B, B more important than C, and C more important than A) are permissible, this situation arises when the importance of the factors being assessed is very close. After the weights and the evaluation values of all factors are determined, the psychological load of a job can be calculated, and only weighted average calculation is needed.
The safety cognition amount is formed by adopting a Likert 5-level scale design amount table, and is respectively divided into 1-5 points from low to high according to the coincidence level, wherein the coincidence level is completely inconsistent, slightly consistent, basically consistent, fairly consistent and very consistent.
In this example, the mental load scale is shown in table 1, table 2 and table 3; the safety awareness scale is shown in table 4: please know the meaning of each factor to make a selection
| Influencing factor | Definition of respective factors |
| Task difficulty | How hard you think of the task? |
| Mental demand | How much mental activity is needed to complete the work (e.g. thinking, decision, calculation, memory, etc.) |
| Physical demands | The type of physical activity required to perform the work (pulling, pushing, turning, controlling, etc.) |
| Time requirement | Does not feel enough time and feels time pressure when the work is finished? |
| Degree of effort | How much effort is done mentally and physically in completing the task? |
| Degree of tension | How much tension you feel during work |
| Degree of fatigue | End of workThen, whether you feel tired |
| Performance of operations | How successful do you think of completing the task? How satisfactory is one's own performance? |
TABLE 1
Now, you choose the factors that generate themselves a greater psychological load, comparing two factors, one of them must be chosen, please mark a "√ shape" on the letter before the corresponding factor.
TABLE 2
TABLE 3
TABLE 4
And the calculating module is used for calculating the SCOREs of the psychological load scale of the testee and normalizing the data by using a Z-SCORE method.
And the data comprehensive processing module is used for calculating scores of the mental load scale and the safety cognition scale of the testee and obtaining a comprehensive score according to the score data.
And the result output module is used for carrying out pre-experiment at the tunnel construction project part before analyzing the comprehensive score, dividing the pre-post safety level of the tested population by utilizing a K-means clustering algorithm after data is collected, and taking the K value of 3 in the pre-post test method, namely, the pre-post states are three types, which are suitable, relatively suitable and unsuitable, obtaining the score threshold values of the three types of states after the pre-experiment is carried out, and classifying the tested population according to the scores. The condition that the tested object is suitable for being put on duty is suitable for indicating that the tested object can be put on duty but needs to receive corresponding training and needs to pay attention during the putting on duty, and the condition that the tested object is not suitable for indicating that the tested object is not to be put into a tunnel construction team.
The method of measurement as in result output module wherein the correlation function is K i (V i )：
ρ(V i ,X 0i ) Is a point V i And a limited interval X 0i ＝[a 0i ,b 0i ]The distance of (d); ρ (V) i ,X pi ) Is a point V i And a limited interval X pi ＝[a pi ,b pi ]；
Calculating the relevance:
wherein A is i K (p) is the attribution degree of the object element to be judged to the pre-post state; when K (P) > 0, P ∈ P 0 The object element to be judged is in the pre-post state, when K is more than or equal to-1 and P is more than or equal to 0, P belongs to P,
it shows that the object element to be judged is not in the state before the post.
The above description is only for the preferred embodiment of the present application, but the scope of the present application is not limited thereto, and any changes or substitutions that can be easily conceived by those skilled in the art within the technical scope of the present application should be covered within the scope of the present application. Therefore, the protection scope of the present application shall be subject to the protection scope of the claims.
Claims (11)
1. A tunnel worker post test method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step 1, acquiring identity information of a testee;
step 2, acquiring physiological characteristic parameters of a testee;
step 3, obtaining the psychological load level of the testee;
step 4, obtaining the safety cognition level of the testee;
step 5, comprehensively calculating a subjective safety evaluation score according to the normalized psychological load score and the normalized safety cognition score;
and 6, comparing the final physiological characteristic parameters with the subjective safety evaluation score threshold value to judge whether the testee is allowed to work on duty.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the identity information of the testee in step 1 includes name, gender, age, working age, cultural degree, and working position.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the physiological characteristic parameters of the subject of step 2 include lung capacity, heart rate, blood oxygen, electrocardiogram, etc.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the psychological load level and the safety awareness level of the subject in steps 3 and 4 are obtained by collecting information from the psychological load scale and the safety awareness scale completed by the subject and evaluated by NASA-TLX method.
5. The method for pre-post testing of a tunnel worker according to claim 1, wherein the step 5 of calculating a subjective safety assessment score comprehensively according to the normalized psychological load score and the normalized safety cognition score comprises:
carrying out standardization processing on the psychological load score and the safety cognition score;
using an AHP analytic hierarchy process to assign weights to the psychological load and the safety cognition two aspect pairs;
and weighting the data standardized by the safety cognition by using an entropy method, and calculating a final subjective safety evaluation score by using a comprehensive data processing module.
6. The method for testing the tunnel worker before post according to claim 1, wherein the step 6 of comparing the final physiological characteristic parameter with the subjective safety evaluation score threshold to determine whether the subject is allowed to go on post comprises the steps of:
comparing the physiological characteristic parameters of the testee with professional data and a normal range preset with the indexes in the detector according to investigation to determine whether the physiological index parameters of the testee meet the standard range, and considering whether a tunnel worker is on duty or not from the physiological parameters;
when the tunnel worker can go on duty according to the physiological parameters, subjective safety evaluation score is considered, and when the score is lower than a pre-experiment discomfort duty score threshold value, the tunnel worker is judged to be unsuitable to go on duty; when the score is higher than the pre-experimental unfit on duty threshold value but lower than the suitable on duty threshold value, judging that the tunnel worker is more suitable for the on duty; and when the score is higher than the pre-experiment suitable post threshold value, judging that the tunnel worker is suitable for the post.
7. A tunnel worker on-post test system, comprising:
the identity information acquisition module is used for acquiring the identity information of the name, the sex, the age, the working age, the cultural degree, the working position and the like of the testee;
the physiological information acquisition module is used for acquiring physiological information of a tested person, such as vital capacity, heart rate, blood oxygen, electrocardiogram and the like;
the psychological load level acquisition module is used for acquiring the psychological load of the testee;
the safety cognition level acquisition module is used for acquiring the safety cognition level of the testee;
the data comprehensive processing module is used for calculating scores of the psychological load scale and the safety cognition scale of the testee and obtaining a comprehensive score according to the score data;
the main control system is respectively connected with the identity information acquisition module, the physiological information acquisition module, the psychological load level acquisition module, the safety cognition level acquisition module and the data comprehensive processing module;
the output module is respectively connected with the physiological information acquisition module and the data comprehensive processing module and is used for judging whether the testee is allowed to go on duty or not;
the first processing module is connected with the vital capacity detection module, the heart rate and blood oxygen detection module and the electrocardio detection module and is used for determining the physical state of the testee according to the vital capacity, the heart rate, the blood oxygen and the electrocardiogram;
the second processing module is used for carrying out standardized processing on the tunnel worker psychological load scale and the safety cognition scale;
the third processing module is used for giving weight to the psychological load and the data standardized by the safety cognition by using an analytic hierarchy process;
and the fourth processing module is used for giving weight to the six dimensionalities of the NASA-TLX by utilizing an entropy method to the safety cognition scale.
8. The physiological information acquisition module according to claim 7, comprising:
the vital capacity detection module is used for collecting the vital capacity of the testee;
the heart rate and blood oxygen detection module is used for acquiring heart rate information of a testee and acquiring the heart rate and the blood oxygen saturation according to the pulse sensor;
the electrocardiogram detection module is used for acquiring the electrocardiogram of the testee.
9. The physiological information acquisition module of claim 8,
the physiological information detection module comprises a vital capacity detector, a pulse sensor and an electrocardiograph, and the instrument can automatically select the existing mature devices according to market demands.
10. The mental load level acquisition module of claim 7, comprising:
the data acquisition module is used for acquiring information in a psychological load scale finished by a testee, wherein the psychological load scale is a tunnel worker psychological load scale designed based on a national aeronautical administration workload scale (NASA-TLX);
and the calculating module is used for calculating the SCOREs of the psychological load scale of the testee and normalizing the data by using a Z-SCORE method.
11. The security awareness level acquisition module of claim 7, comprising:
the data acquisition module is used for acquiring information in a safety cognition measurement scale finished by a testee, wherein the safety cognition measurement scale is a tunnel worker safety cognition scale developed based on a coal mine worker safety cognition scale and combined with tunnel construction characteristics;
and the calculation module is used for calculating the SCORE of the safety cognition measurement table of the testee and normalizing the data by using a Z-SCORE method.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210586256.XA CN114999641A (en) | 2022-05-26 | 2022-05-26 | Tunnel worker post test method and system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210586256.XA CN114999641A (en) | 2022-05-26 | 2022-05-26 | Tunnel worker post test method and system |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN114999641A true CN114999641A (en) | 2022-09-02 |
Family
ID=83028317
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210586256.XA Pending CN114999641A (en) | 2022-05-26 | 2022-05-26 | Tunnel worker post test method and system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN114999641A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN116384954A (en) * | 2023-04-10 | 2023-07-04 | 江苏万成钢构科技有限公司 | Engineering personnel post condition evaluation method and evaluation system |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20070117070A1 (en) * | 2005-11-23 | 2007-05-24 | Alvin Krass | Vocational assessment testing device and method |
| CN102737348A (en) * | 2011-04-06 | 2012-10-17 | 中国矿业大学(北京) | Miner safety behavior competence evaluation system |
| CN113995412A (en) * | 2021-12-07 | 2022-02-01 | 福州大学 | Construction worker construction fatigue degree detection device and method |
| CN114391845A (en) * | 2021-12-07 | 2022-04-26 | 福州大学 | Method and system for measuring psychological fatigue of building construction equipment operators |
-
2022
- 2022-05-26 CN CN202210586256.XA patent/CN114999641A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20070117070A1 (en) * | 2005-11-23 | 2007-05-24 | Alvin Krass | Vocational assessment testing device and method |
| CN102737348A (en) * | 2011-04-06 | 2012-10-17 | 中国矿业大学(北京) | Miner safety behavior competence evaluation system |
| CN113995412A (en) * | 2021-12-07 | 2022-02-01 | 福州大学 | Construction worker construction fatigue degree detection device and method |
| CN114391845A (en) * | 2021-12-07 | 2022-04-26 | 福州大学 | Method and system for measuring psychological fatigue of building construction equipment operators |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN116384954A (en) * | 2023-04-10 | 2023-07-04 | 江苏万成钢构科技有限公司 | Engineering personnel post condition evaluation method and evaluation system |
| CN116384954B (en) * | 2023-04-10 | 2024-01-26 | 江苏万成钢构科技有限公司 | Engineering personnel post condition evaluation method and evaluation system |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Tipton et al. | Physiological employment standards I. Occupational fitness standards: objectively subjective? | |
| Mittenberg et al. | Identification of malingered head injury on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised. | |
| KR102061725B1 (en) | Method, system and non-transitory computer-readable recording medium for diagnosing mental health | |
| CN108135548A (en) | For monitoring the method and system of pressure state | |
| CN104983434A (en) | Multi-parameter mental stress assessment method based on analytical hierarchy method and device | |
| CN114999641A (en) | Tunnel worker post test method and system | |
| Detullio et al. | A meta-analysis of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST). | |
| Howell et al. | Reliability and minimal detectable change for a smartphone-based motor-cognitive assessment: implications for concussion management | |
| CN114864086A (en) | Disease prediction method based on lung function report template | |
| Sullivan et al. | A technique for objective configural analysis of MMPI profiles. | |
| KR20190053011A (en) | Apparatus and method for predicting physical stability | |
| Li et al. | Predicting PTSD symptoms in firefighters using a fear-potentiated startle paradigm and machine learning | |
| CN106725529A (en) | Group mind evaluation system based on Bluetooth transmission | |
| Mohan et al. | Perceived Stress Prediction among Employees using Machine Learning techniques | |
| Hartley et al. | The Apache II scoring system in neurosurgical patients: a comparison with simple Glasgow coma scoring | |
| CN116862283A (en) | Method and system for evaluating and controlling environment of aged people | |
| CN116230213A (en) | Intelligent injury identification method and system | |
| CN115019954A (en) | Post-traumatic stress disorder patient prediction system | |
| Abdul Samad et al. | Effect of Mental Workload on Heart Rate Variability and Reaction Time of Aircraft Maintenance Personnel | |
| RU2245097C1 (en) | Method for estimating occupational skills of personnel working in various application fields | |
| Hale et al. | Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised (WISC-R) patterns of strengths and weaknesses as predictors of the intelligence-achievement relationship | |
| Sanaei et al. | Designing and implementing fuzzy expert system for diagnosis of psoriasis | |
| CN111986801A (en) | Rehabilitation evaluation method, device and medium based on deep learning | |
| Melillo et al. | Heart rate variability for automatic assessment of congestive heart failure severity | |
| Larrabee | Selection of tests and batteries for forensic neuropsychological evaluations. |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |