CN114580914A

CN114580914A - Method for evaluating job declaration

Info

Publication number: CN114580914A
Application number: CN202210217151.7A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 汪新星; 黄聪辉; 秦兴和
Original assignee: Hefei Hongjing Software Co ltd
Current assignee: Hefei Hongjing Software Co ltd
Priority date: 2022-03-07
Filing date: 2022-03-07
Publication date: 2022-06-03

Abstract

The invention discloses a method for evaluating a title declaration, which relates to the technical field of title evaluation and solves the technical problems of large workload and low declaration efficiency caused by non-uniform title declaration standards and complex declaration flow in the prior art; according to the invention, different scoring standards are established according to the evaluation standards, the evaluation standards and the scoring standards can be dynamically adjusted at any time, the job rating is associated with the corresponding scoring standards, and when the declaration material is filled in and evaluated, the scoring detail of each scoring item can be timely obtained, so that the declaration efficiency can be improved, and the workload can be reduced; when the evaluation plan is issued, the corresponding scoring standard is copied and marked, the relation between the scoring standard and the original scoring standard is separated, when the original scoring standard is modified, the issued evaluation plan and the corresponding declaration process are not influenced, the scoring standard is ensured to meet the regulation, and meanwhile, the job title declaration difficulty of professional technicians is reduced.

Description

Job declaration and review method

Technical Field

The invention belongs to the field of title review, relates to a title declaration review technology, and particularly relates to a title declaration review method.

Background

In the process of evaluating the job title, the standard of the review and identification of the job title is continuously adjusted and changed, and due to the characteristics of the professional technical job title, the professional technical staff have clear professional and regional characteristics in the standard of the review of the job title.

In the existing title review method, professional technicians report according to the title review standard, and all levels of administrative departments review the reported materials and then gather the materials to a review board for final review; in the prior art, professional technicians cannot comprehensively know the reporting standards of the titles, so that reporting materials are difficult to fill, and assessment experts need to carefully screen the reporting materials, so that the workload of the assessment experts is large; therefore, a method for reporting and reviewing the job title is needed.

Disclosure of Invention

The present invention is directed to solving at least one of the problems of the prior art; therefore, the invention provides a method for evaluating the title declaration, which is used for solving the technical problems of large workload and low declaration efficiency caused by non-uniform title declaration standards and complex declaration flow in the prior art.

According to the invention, different scoring standards are established according to the evaluation standard, the evaluation standard and the scoring standard can be dynamically adjusted at any time, the job rating is associated with the corresponding scoring standard, and the scoring detail of each scoring item can be timely obtained when the declaration material is filled in and evaluated, so that the declaration efficiency can be improved, and the workload can be reduced.

In order to achieve the above object, a first aspect of the present invention provides a method for evaluating a job declaration, including:

establishing a grading standard according to the evaluation standard; wherein, the evaluation standard and the scoring standard can be dynamically adjusted at any time;

issuing a review plan and copying a scoring standard; acquiring and analyzing basic information, and automatically generating declaration content according to an analysis result and a grading standard; wherein, the basic information comprises personal information and job title grades;

filling the declaration content by professional technicians to obtain declaration materials; and the declaration material is audited by each audit unit and then is sent to the corresponding expert judges.

Preferably, the evaluation standard is converted into a plurality of scoring standards, and the scoring standards comprise a plurality of scoring items; wherein the scoring criteria include a name, a category, and a total score, and the category includes quantitative and qualitative.

Preferably, the job title level is associated with a corresponding scoring criterion; wherein, the job title grades comprise a primary job title, a middle-level job title and a high-level job title.

Preferably, analyzing the basic information to obtain a corresponding scoring criterion includes:

acquiring basic information, and automatically checking the basic information;

and after the verification is passed, extracting the job title grades in the basic information, and acquiring the scoring standards corresponding to the job title grades.

Preferably, after the review plan is issued, the corresponding scoring standards are copied and marked; wherein the labeled scoring criteria are not modifiable.

Preferably, when the basic information passes the verification, generating declaration content according to a scoring criterion, including:

acquiring a grading standard, and automatically generating declaration content by combining a set format; setting a format to determine the presentation style of the declaration content;

and marking and annotating each sub-content in the declared content.

Preferably, after the declaration material is acquired, the automatic verification of the declaration material includes:

calling an automatic verification program; wherein, the automatic verification program is established based on a machine learning algorithm;

and detecting various contents in the declared materials through an automatic verification program, and sequentially sending the declared materials to an auditing unit when the detection is passed.

Preferably, before the declaration material is automatically checked, a keyword detection method is combined with preset keywords, and violation analysis is performed on the declaration material;

and when the declared material has no violation, automatically checking the declared material.

Preferably, after each audit unit passes the audit in sequence, the expert judges are used to comment on the declaration material, and the method includes:

randomly selecting a plurality of expert judges from an expert database according to the declaration material;

and the plurality of expert judges perform comment assigning on each scoring item and the corresponding declaration material and fill in assigning basis to obtain the total score of the declaration material.

Compared with the prior art, the invention has the beneficial effects that:

1. according to the invention, different scoring standards are established according to the reviewing standards, the reviewing standards and the scoring standards can be dynamically adjusted at any time, the job rating is associated with the corresponding scoring standards, and the scoring detail of each scoring item can be timely obtained when the reporting material is filled in and reviewed, so that the reporting efficiency can be improved, and the workload can be reduced.

2. When the evaluation plan is issued, the corresponding scoring standard is copied and marked, the relation between the scoring standard and the original scoring standard is separated, when the original scoring standard is modified, the issued evaluation plan and the corresponding declaration process are not influenced, the scoring standard is ensured to meet the regulation, and meanwhile, the job title declaration difficulty of professional technicians is reduced.

Drawings

In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly described below, it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and for those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained according to the drawings without creative efforts.

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of the working steps of the present invention.

Detailed Description

The technical solutions of the present invention will be described clearly and completely with reference to the following embodiments, and it should be understood that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.

In the traditional job title review method, professional technicians report according to the job title review standard, and all levels of administrative departments review the reported materials and then gather the reported materials to a review board for final review, wherein the process mainly has the following defects:

1) the professional technician reports difficulty

In order to meet the requirements of various series and professions for declaration, the universal job declaration form is necessarily highly simplified and generalized, so that in the specific declaration process, a professional technician does not know which kind of achievement needs to be filled in which place, and great trouble is brought to the professional technician; meanwhile, different series and industries have different requirements, and various additional declaration requirements, explanations and the like are issued every year, so that more problems are brought to professional technicians.

2) Expert's difficulty in evaluation

In the process of expert review, according to the review standard, the expert needs to search for the corresponding required submission achievement from a plurality of submission materials provided by the professional technical personnel one by one, the submission materials need to be repeatedly carried and disassembled on site (the submission materials need to be returned to the professional technical personnel finally), and the omission is avoided by careful search, so that the difficulty of expert review is increased, the efficiency is low, and the error rate is high.

Even if part of the titles can be submitted and reviewed online, the following problems still exist in the practical process:

1) can not be automatically matched with the evaluation standard change

Due to the requirements of large environment and the actual requirements of review of the titles of all parts, the series of review standards are generally adjusted every several years. After the evaluation standard is adjusted, the corresponding software system needs to perform function adaptation and code modification, and cannot automatically adjust according to the change of the evaluation standard.

2) Can not radically solve the problem of difficult evaluation of experts

Firstly, most of the titles of online systems only solve the problem of material declaration, but do not realize the online review function; and secondly, even if the online evaluation function is realized, only the paper materials are converted into the information data, and when the experts evaluate, the corresponding declaration materials still need to be searched in the information data according to the evaluation standard, so that the corresponding relation between the evaluation standard and the declaration materials cannot be fundamentally solved.

Referring to fig. 1, a first aspect of the present application provides a method for reviewing a job declaration, including:

issuing a review plan and copying a scoring standard; acquiring and analyzing basic information, and automatically generating declaration content according to an analysis result and a grading standard;

The evaluation standard in the application is set by the top competent department of the job evaluation, can be understood as the general rule of the job evaluation and is used for standardizing the job evaluation process, so the evaluation standard is highly generalized content. On the basis of the evaluation standards, different scoring standards are respectively defined by each evaluation committee according to respective series, professional and job ratings and the like, and the evaluation standards and the scoring standards can be dynamically adjusted at any time.

It can be understood that different job title grades should correspond to different scoring standards, that is, each job title grade in the same industry corresponds to one scoring standard; of course, if only one job title level is set by the industry or the specialty, only one scoring criteria is generated based on the review criteria.

The scoring standards in the application comprise a plurality of scoring items, each scoring standard is provided with a corresponding name, a category and a total score, and the category mainly comprises a quantitative standard with a score requirement and a qualitative standard without the score requirement.

And quantifying all the evaluation rules of the job title evaluation committee into evaluable scoring standards, forming classifications according to similar types, and providing a plurality of evaluation scoring items under the classifications. Generally, classifications are formed according to abilities, performances, scientific researches and the like, and under each classification, scoring items are created from multiple angles according to assessment requirements, such as:

classification parameter 1: a classification name;

classification parameter 2: maximum score (required by quantitative criteria), refers to the value of the maximum allowed score for the present classification.

Classification parameter 3: maximum input quantity (representing the scoring items under the classification, the maximum quantity allowed to be declared by a user during declaration, and no limitation is caused when the quantity is 0);

classification parameter 4: the minimum input number (representing the scoring items under the classification, the minimum reporting number of the user during reporting, and no limitation when the reporting number is 0);

classification parameter 5: the effective fraction amount is obtained. And if the score is 0, the score is larger than 0, which indicates that all the scoring items under a certain classification take the top N scoring values.

Classification parameter 6: whether the necessary item is required or not indicates whether the scoring item in the classification needs to be input at least one item or not.

Scoring item parameter 1: the evaluation item names describe the evaluation contents of the evaluation item during evaluation;

scoring item parameter 2: the minimum score represents the minimum score of the score item, and is generally 0;

scoring item parameter 3: the maximum score represents the maximum scoring possibility of the scoring item;

scoring item parameter 4: the maximum input quantity is not limited when being 0, and when being more than 0, the maximum input quantity indicates that the scoring item allows the input of N materials at most;

scoring item parameters 5: the minimum input quantity is not limited when being 0, and when being more than 0, the minimum input quantity indicates that N materials are required to be input in the scoring item;

scoring item parameters 6: whether the evaluation item is necessary or not indicates whether the evaluation item is required to upload application materials or not;

score item parameter 7: the input mode is that if the input mode is input by the user, the scoring item is automatically displayed on a user declaration interface, and the user uploads the material; when the evaluation is 'expert evaluation only', the evaluation item is not displayed on a user declaration interface, but the expert is visible and must be evaluated during the expert evaluation;

scoring item parameter 8: and the scoring detailed rule represents the basis of assigning scores to the scoring items during the evaluation of experts.

In one embodiment, the job title grades are associated with corresponding scoring criteria, the job title grades including primary, intermediate and advanced job titles.

It can be understood that the category of the job title level should be set according to the actual situation, and the job title level is at least one, for example, this embodiment:

if the standard A is set currently and is associated with the middle-level title, the professional technician selects the middle-level title to declare, and the information needing to be input is generated by using the standard A; when the expert reviews, the declaration material is automatically generated according to the A standard when the declaration material is reviewed or assigned.

After the scoring standard is established, a review plan can be issued; the professional and the job title levels and other related information of the review plan are specified in the review plan; after the review plan is released, the professional can begin to apply the title.

In one embodiment, after the review plan is published, the corresponding scoring criteria are copied and marked; wherein the labeled scoring criteria are not modifiable.

It should be noted that, when the review plan is released, the existing scoring standards corresponding to the declaration titles are all allowed to be copied into the review plan and are not related to the existing scoring standards, and when the existing scoring standards are modified again, the scoring standards in the released review plan are not affected by the existing scoring standards.

In one embodiment, analyzing the basic information to obtain the corresponding scoring criteria includes:

acquiring basic information, and automatically checking the basic information;

When professional technicians declare titles, the declaration materials required to be provided are mainly classified into 2 types: personal basic information and performance materials.

Personal basic information part: the method mainly comprises personal basic conditions, academic conditions, continuing education conditions, work experiences and the like, wherein the part of contents are public information and are not related to series and professions, and all professional technicians need to provide the information.

Performance materials section: the partial information mainly reflects the professional technical ability, achievement, scientific research and the like of the individual, and is used for expert judges whether the professional level meets the professional technical requirements or not.

The main purpose of this embodiment is to perform automatic verification on basic information, and the automatic verification mainly avoids basic errors occurring in the basic information, such as wrongly written characters and non-correspondence before and after contents, and can improve the overall efficiency.

In an optional embodiment, when the basic information passes the verification, generating declaration content according to the scoring criteria includes:

acquiring a grading standard, and automatically generating declaration content by combining a set format;

and marking and annotating each sub-content in the declared content.

The main purpose of this embodiment is to present the content to be filled in to professional ji book staff according to the standard format, set the format to determine the presentation style of the declared content, and in different environments (display device, network protocol), the set format may be different.

In the embodiment, each sub-content in the declaration content is marked according to the scoring standard, and is annotated simultaneously as necessary items; it will be appreciated that the annotations are implemented based on scoring criteria for the purpose of instructing a skilled practitioner to quickly fill in relevant material.

In one embodiment, after acquiring the declared material, automatically verifying the declared material comprises:

calling an automatic checking program; wherein, the automatic verification program is established based on a machine learning algorithm;

The embodiment automatically checks the declaration material, so as to ensure that the finally submitted declaration material is complete and avoid the declaration efficiency being reduced by the return modification.

The auditing unit in the embodiment mainly comprises a unit, a competent department, a construction unit and the like of professional technicians, and the declaration material is audited layer by layer and then sent to the expert panel board by the panel board.

In an optional embodiment, before the declaration material is automatically checked, a keyword detection method is combined with preset keywords, and violation analysis is carried out on the declaration material;

The main purpose of this embodiment is to detect whether the declaration material has a violation phenomenon, and the violation phenomenon mainly refers to information that may affect the job title level to evaluate fairness, and avoids the occurrence of unfairness.

In one embodiment, after each audit unit passes the audit in sequence, the declaration material is reviewed by an expert reviewer, including:

and a plurality of expert judges perform comment awarding on each scoring item and the corresponding declaration materials, fill the awarding basis and obtain the total score of the declaration materials.

In this embodiment, when the expert evaluation committee evaluates the user declaration material, the system automatically extracts the scoring standard corresponding to the declaration material to form an expert evaluation suggestion table. And (4) assigning scores by the experts item by item according to the scoring standard, filling the assigning basis, and automatically calculating the total score.

In this embodiment, when the expert judges click a certain scoring item, the system automatically locates the user declaration material corresponding to the scoring item for the expert judges to comment.

The working principle of the invention is as follows:

combining the evaluation standard with the actual situation to establish different grading standards; and generating and issuing a review plan, and copying the mark corresponding scoring standard.

Acquiring and analyzing basic information, and automatically generating declaration content according to an analysis result and a grading standard; and filling the declaration content by professional technicians to obtain declaration materials.

And the declaration material is audited by each audit unit and then is sent to the corresponding expert judges, and the expert judges perform comment voting on the declaration material.

Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the preferred embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating a job declaration, comprising:

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the review criteria are converted into scoring criteria, and the scoring criteria include scoring terms; wherein the scoring criteria include a name, a category, and a total score, and the category includes quantitative and qualitative.

3. The method of claim 1 or 2, wherein the title rating is associated with corresponding scoring criteria; wherein, the job title grades comprise primary job titles, intermediate job titles and advanced job titles.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein analyzing the basic information to obtain corresponding scoring criteria comprises:

acquiring basic information, and automatically checking the basic information;

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the review plan is issued and then the corresponding scoring criteria are copied and labeled; wherein the labeled scoring criteria are not modifiable.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein generating declaration content according to scoring criteria when the basic information is verified comprises:

acquiring a scoring standard, and automatically generating declaration content by combining a set format; setting a format to determine the presentation style of the declaration content;

and marking and annotating each sub-content in the declared content.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein automatically verifying the declared material after the declared material is obtained comprises:

8. The method according to claim 7, wherein a keyword detection method is combined with a preset keyword to analyze violation of the declared material before the declared material is automatically verified;

9. The method of claim 2, wherein after each audit unit passes the audit in turn, the expert judges comment on the declaration material, including: