CN114493811A - Decentralized work examination method and device - Google Patents
Decentralized work examination method and device Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN114493811A CN114493811A CN202210407429.7A CN202210407429A CN114493811A CN 114493811 A CN114493811 A CN 114493811A CN 202210407429 A CN202210407429 A CN 202210407429A CN 114493811 A CN114493811 A CN 114493811A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- loss value
- node
- work
- social loss
- target
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
- G06Q30/08—Auctions
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
- G06Q30/0601—Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
- G06Q30/0611—Request for offers or quotes
Abstract
The application discloses a decentralized work examination method and a decentralized work examination device. Wherein, the method comprises the following steps: receiving the works uploaded by the creation nodes; determining a target review node from the plurality of review nodes based on the type of the work, and determining the estimated social loss value corresponding to the work through the target review node, wherein the target review node is also used for collecting review cost provided by the creation node; auctioning a vouching responsibility for the work and determining a target vouching node based on the auction result, wherein the target vouching node is configured to receive a first vouching fee provided by the authoring node and provide a vouching responsibility for the work, the vouching responsibility comprising: and when the actual social loss value generated by the work does not exceed the estimated social loss value, the target guarantee node and the creation node together provide compensation for the actual social loss value. The method and the device solve the technical problems that in the related art, works on a decentralized creation platform lack an effective review mechanism and are prone to causing adverse social influence.
Description
Technical Field
The application relates to the technical field of block chains, in particular to a decentralized work examination method and device.
Background
With the birth and development of various creation platforms such as live broadcast platforms and social media, more and more individual creators begin to deliver their works on the creation platforms, the individual creators obtain fans and influence through creation and the profitable economic behavior is called creator economy, the rapid development of the creator economy makes the monopoly of traditional media to information channels broken gradually, and the rights of creation content presentation are gradually transferred from traditional media to individual creators and creation platforms. In addition, decentralized social media such as Mastodon and Steemit are also emerging with the development of blockchain technology.
Different from the traditional creation platform, the decentralized creation platform is not owned by a certain company, and a centralized management team does not exist, on the decentralized creation platform, individual creators can freely release the created works, and the release, management and income of the works are completed through a code protocol. However, due to the lack of content review and supervision by a centralized management team with decentralized authoring platforms, individual authors may misuse their authoring rights, passing information that causes social harm; in addition, it may be difficult for individual authors to pay high social losses and may choose to leave the platform to avoid reimbursements, and going to a centralized authoring platform may also be difficult to thoroughly track the responsibility of individual authors to deliver harmful information.
In view of the above problems, no effective solution has been proposed.
Disclosure of Invention
The embodiment of the application provides a decentralization work examination method and a decentralization work examination device, and at least solves the technical problems that in the related technology, works on a decentralization creation platform lack an effective examination mechanism and are prone to causing adverse social influence.
According to an aspect of an embodiment of the present application, there is provided a method of decentralized work review, comprising: receiving the works uploaded by the creation nodes; determining a target review node from a plurality of review nodes based on the type of the work, and determining the estimated social loss value corresponding to the work through the target review node, wherein the target review node is also used for collecting review fees provided by the creation node; auctioning a vouching responsibility for said work and determining a target vouching node based on the auction result, wherein said target vouching node is configured to receive a first vouching fee provided by said authoring node and to provide said vouching responsibility for said work, said vouching responsibility comprising: and when the actual social loss value generated by the work does not exceed the estimated social loss value, the target guarantee node and the creation node together provide compensation for the actual social loss value.
Optionally, the method further comprises: establishing an extreme loss guarantee pool, wherein the extreme loss guarantee pool is used for collecting a second guarantee fee provided by the authoring node and a third guarantee fee provided by the investment node; when the actual social loss value generated by the work exceeds the estimated social loss value, providing compensation for the difference value between the actual social loss value and the estimated social loss value; and when the extreme loss guarantee pool generates income, distributing the income to the investment nodes.
Optionally, acquiring a technical field type corresponding to the work provided by the creation node; determining a first preset number of the target review nodes from a plurality of review nodes associated with the technology field type.
Optionally, a conservative social loss value is preset, and the following review process is repeatedly performed: examining the works through the target examination nodes, and estimating whether the social loss value of the works is smaller than the conservative social loss value; when the estimated social loss value of the work is smaller than the conservative social loss value, taking the conservative social loss value as the estimated social loss value, and ending the examination process; and when the social loss value of the work is estimated to be not less than the conservative social loss value, calculating the conservative social loss value based on a preset calculation mode, assigning a calculation result to the conservative social loss value, and executing the examination process again.
Optionally, obtaining a review opinion of each target review node on whether the social loss value of the work is smaller than the conservative social loss value; determining a first proportion of a first type of target examination node in all the target examination nodes, wherein the examination opinions of the first type of target examination node are that the social loss value of the works is smaller than the conservative social loss value; when the first proportion is larger than a preset threshold value, predicting that the social loss value of the work is smaller than the conservative social loss value; and when the first ratio is not greater than a preset threshold value, estimating that the social loss value of the work is not less than the conservative social loss value.
Optionally, when the actual social loss value generated by the work does not exceed the preset conservative social loss value, the actual social loss value is compensated by the creation node; when the actual social loss value generated by the work is between the preset conservative social loss value and the estimated social loss value, the creation node compensates for the preset conservative social loss value, and the target guarantee node compensates for a difference between the actual social loss value and the preset conservative social loss value.
Optionally, determining a second preset number of sub-vouching responsibilities based on the vouching responsibilities, the sub-vouching responsibilities including: when the actual social loss value generated by the work is between the preset conservative social loss value and the estimated social loss value, the target guarantee node compensates for a second proportion of a difference value between the actual social loss value and the preset conservative social loss value; auctioning the sub-guarantee responsibilities to a plurality of guarantee nodes, acquiring auction bids of the plurality of guarantee nodes aiming at the sub-guarantee responsibilities, and sequencing the auction bids from low to high; determining the guarantee node corresponding to the auction bid of the second preset number in the front sequence as the target guarantee node; and collecting a deposit from the target security node based on the estimated social loss value, and determining the first security fee which needs to be provided by the creation node to the target security node based on the auction quotation of the target security node.
According to another aspect of embodiments of the present application, there is also provided a decentralized work review device, comprising: the receiving module is used for receiving the works uploaded by the creation nodes; the examination module is used for determining a target examination node from a plurality of examination nodes based on the type of the work, and determining the estimated social loss value corresponding to the work through the target examination node, wherein the target examination node is also used for collecting examination cost provided by the creation node; a vouching module for auctioning a vouching responsibility for said work and determining a target vouching node based on the auction result, wherein said target vouching node is configured to receive a first vouching fee provided by said authoring node and provide said vouching responsibility for said work, said vouching responsibility comprising: and when the actual social loss value generated by the work does not exceed the estimated social loss value, the target guarantee node and the creation node together provide compensation for the actual social loss value.
According to another aspect of the embodiments of the present application, there is also provided a non-volatile storage medium, where the non-volatile storage medium includes a stored program, and the program, when running, controls a device in which the non-volatile storage medium is located to perform the foregoing decentralized work review method.
According to another aspect of the embodiments of the present application, there is also provided a processor for executing a program, where the program executes the decentralized work review method described above.
In the embodiment of the application, after receiving the works uploaded by the authoring nodes, the decentralized authoring platform determines target review nodes from a plurality of review nodes based on the types of the works, determines the estimated social loss value corresponding to the works through the target review nodes, and meanwhile, the target review nodes can collect review cost provided by the authoring nodes; and then, the platform auctions guarantee responsibility on the works, determines a target guarantee node based on the auction result, and the target guarantee node receives a first guarantee fee provided by the creation node and provides guarantee responsibility for the works, wherein the target guarantee node and the creation node need to provide compensation for the actual social loss value when the actual social loss value generated by the works does not exceed the estimated social loss value. The production is censored through the censored nodes, and the production is guaranteed through the guarantee nodes, so that the decentralized creation platform can efficiently censore the production and compensate social loss caused by the efficient censored production while guaranteeing the freedom degree of uploading the production by the creation nodes, and the technical problem that the production on the decentralized creation platform is lack of an effective censoring mechanism and adverse social influence is easily caused in the related technology is solved.
Drawings
The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the application and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this application, illustrate embodiment(s) of the application and together with the description serve to explain the application and not to limit the application. In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow diagram of a method of decentralized work review, according to an embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of a work technology field type according to an embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a decentralized work review device according to an embodiment of the present application.
Detailed Description
In order to make the technical solutions better understood by those skilled in the art, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present application, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only partial embodiments of the present application, but not all embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present application.
It should be noted that the terms "first," "second," and the like in the description and claims of this application and in the drawings described above are used for distinguishing between similar elements and not necessarily for describing a particular sequential or chronological order. It is to be understood that the data so used is interchangeable under appropriate circumstances such that the embodiments of the application described herein are capable of operation in sequences other than those illustrated or described herein. Furthermore, the terms "comprises," "comprising," and any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, system, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of steps or elements is not necessarily limited to those steps or elements expressly listed, but may include other steps or elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus.
For a better understanding of the embodiments of the present application, some of the terms or expressions appearing in the course of describing the embodiments of the present application are to be interpreted as follows:
decentralization: in a system with a plurality of nodes, each node has a highly autonomous characteristic, the nodes can be freely connected with each other to form a new connection unit, any node can be a staged center, but does not have a mandatory central control function, and the influence between the nodes can form a nonlinear causal relationship through a network. This open, flattened, equal system phenomenon or structure is referred to as decentralization.
Example 1
In accordance with an embodiment of the present application, there is provided a decentralized work review method, it being noted that the steps illustrated in the flowchart of the figure may be performed in a computer system, such as a set of computer-executable instructions, and that while a logical order is illustrated in the flowchart, in some cases the steps illustrated or described may be performed in an order different than here.
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow chart of an alternative decentralized work review method according to an embodiment of the present application, as shown in FIG. 1, the method including at least steps S102-S106, wherein:
and step S102, receiving the works uploaded by the creation nodes.
Wherein, the authoring node mainly refers to the individual author who uploads the work at decentralized authoring platform, and it uploads the work to the platform in order to obtain the volume of playing for interest or benefit, and the content of uploading the work can include: entertainment short videos, teaching videos, music sharing, photos, novels and other multimedia contents.
Because the decentralized creation platform lacks content review and supervision of a centralized management team, the creators upload works relatively freely, and at the moment, part of the creators can misuse the creation rights of the creators and transmit information causing social loss; meanwhile, the author may have difficulty in compensating for high social loss, and may choose to leave the platform to avoid the compensation, so that the platform also has difficulty in thoroughly pursuing the responsibility of the author.
In order to solve the above problems, the embodiments of the present application introduce a review and guarantee mechanism, where the work uploaded by the creator needs to be reviewed and guaranteed before the work is published, and the creator needs to provide corresponding review cost and guarantee cost, that is, while the creation right is transferred to the creator, the creator is required to take appropriate responsibility, which can reduce social burden to some extent.
The product review process and the product guarantee process are specifically described below.
And step S104, determining a target review node from the plurality of review nodes based on the type of the work, and determining the estimated social loss value corresponding to the work through the target review node, wherein the target review node is also used for collecting review fees provided by the creation node.
The review node mainly refers to reviewers reviewing the works on the decentralized creation platform, and the reviewers may be common users selected in the review stage, and the users review the works through selling labor force to obtain review fees.
Since works uploaded by different creators relate to a plurality of technical fields, and each reviewer has one or more technical fields with his or her own proficiency, in order to ensure the reliability of the review result, when a certain work is reviewed, the work needs to be distributed to reviewers familiar with the technical fields of the work as much as possible. In some optional embodiments of the present application, a technology domain type corresponding to a work provided by an authoring node may be obtained, and then a first preset number of target censoring nodes may be determined from a plurality of censoring nodes associated with the technology domain type.
Fig. 2 is a schematic tree diagram of an alternative type of technical field of works, where each parent node includes a plurality of child nodes, and a reviewer may be familiar with the technical field corresponding to one child node a but familiar with the technical field corresponding to the adjacent child node B. For a work in a certain technical field, when a sufficient number of reviewers in the technical field cannot be found, the reviewers in the technical field need to be searched. One suitable assumption is that the familiarity of the reviewer for technical field B depends on the distance between technical field A and the nearest common ancestor of technical field B and technical field A, with smaller distances being more familiar. In selecting reviewers, a balance is sought between the number of reviewers available and the familiarity of the reviewers with the work, and for each work, a nearest ancestor technology area can be found upwards in its technology area, ensuring that a predetermined percentage of reviewers have at least one area of mastery in a sub-tree of the ancestor technology area, and then randomly selecting a first predetermined number of target reviewers from the reviewers to review the work. This approach may avoid selecting reviewers too narrowly so that the review results are affected by potential attackers.
Alternatively, the reviewer may reject the review task after the platform assigns the task, and once the reviewer accepts the review task, an estimate of the socially damaging value of the work must be submitted.
In some optional embodiments of the present application, a conservative social loss value may be preset empirically when reviewing a work, and then the following review process is repeatedly performed:
and S1, examining the works through the target examination nodes, and estimating whether the social loss value of the works is smaller than the conservative social loss value.
Specifically, a review opinion indicating whether the social loss value of each target review node for the work is less than the conservative social loss value or not can be obtained; determining a first proportion of a first type of target examination node in all target examination nodes, wherein the examination opinions of the first type of target examination node are that the social loss value of the work is smaller than the conservative social loss value; when the first proportion is larger than a preset threshold value, the social loss value of the estimated work is smaller than the conservative social loss value; and when the first proportion is not greater than the preset threshold value, the social loss value of the estimated work is not less than the conservative social loss value.
And S2, when the social loss value of the estimated work is smaller than the conservative social loss value, directly taking the conservative social loss value as the estimated social loss value, and ending the examination process.
S3, when the social loss value of the predicted work is not less than the conservative social loss value, the conservative social loss value is calculated based on a preset calculation mode, the calculation result is assigned to the conservative social loss value, the review process is executed again, and the step S1 is executed again.
The preset calculation mode may be that the current conservative social loss value is doubled in each calculation, for example, the preset conservative social loss value is
The conservative social loss value after calculation and reassignment is sequentially
、
、…。
When the examination fee is determined, because only a small part of the social loss value of the works can be revealed later, but more social loss values of the works are unknown, and the examination fee cannot be determined according to the social loss values of the works, the embodiment of the application provides an examination fee calculation mode for designing and encouraging honest reporting according to the examination of examiners on the works. For example, the platform packs not less than 4 works in the same technical field into a checking task each time and determines a target checker, on the basis, each checker is guaranteed to check the same work at most once, and finally, a determinant mutual information score is calculated according to a checking result and checking cost is calculated in a proportional manner.
Step S106, auctioning guarantee responsibility for the work, and determining a target guarantee node based on the auction result, wherein the target guarantee node is used for receiving a first guarantee fee provided by the creation node and providing guarantee responsibility for the work, and the guarantee responsibility comprises: and when the actual social loss value generated by the work does not exceed the estimated social loss value, the target guarantee node and the creation node together provide compensation for the actual social loss value.
The guarantee node mainly refers to a guarantee person who guarantees the work on a centralized creation platform, and is usually a professional user who bids the guarantee responsibility of the work in a guarantee auction stage, and needs to pay a certain deposit in advance to become a guarantee person, and the guarantee person can submit a quote for any work waiting for guarantee to be competitive, wherein the quote is a guarantee fee which needs to be charged by the guarantee person to bear social loss value possibly generated by the work.
In view of the greater risk that a work is held if it is held by a vouchers, in some alternative embodiments of the present application, a second predetermined number of sub-vouching responsibilities may be determined based on the vouching responsibilities, including: when the actual social loss value generated by the work is between the preset conservative social loss value and the estimated social loss value, the target guarantee node compensates for a second proportion of the difference value between the actual social loss value and the preset conservative social loss value, the second proportion can be set according to a second preset number, and the second preset number can be set according to the estimated social loss value of the work; the sub-vouching responsibilities are then auctioned to a plurality of vouching nodes, and a target vouching node is determined based on the results of the auctions.
During the wagering responsibility auction period, a deterministic incentive compatible wagering auction mode may be used, such as a second preset number of wagerers with the lowest bid being set to receive wagering responsibility. Specifically, auction offers of a plurality of guarantee nodes for the sub-guarantee responsibilities can be obtained, and the auction offers are sorted from low to high; determining the guarantee nodes corresponding to the auction bids with the second preset number in the front sequence as target guarantee nodes; and collecting a deposit to the target security node based on the estimated social loss value, and determining a first security fee which needs to be provided to the target security node by the creation node based on the auction quotation of the target security node.
In some optional embodiments of the present application, the foregoing method for censoring a decentralized work further includes: step S108, establishing an extreme loss guarantee pool, wherein the extreme loss guarantee pool is used for collecting a second guarantee fee provided by the creation node and a third guarantee fee provided by the investment node; when the actual social loss value generated by the work exceeds the estimated social loss value, providing compensation for the difference value between the actual social loss value and the estimated social loss value; and distributing the income to the investment nodes when the extremely loss guarantee pool generates the income.
The extreme loss guarantee pool is a central fund pool used for guaranteeing social loss value exceeding the expected social loss value of a reviewer caused by the bottom-bound compensation works, provides guarantee for all the works in the platform, and charges a second guarantee fee which is fixed and enough to be ignored for each work. The investment node is an investor in a decentralized authoring platform, wherein any user can serve as an investor to fund the extreme loss guarantee pool, namely, a third guarantee cost is provided, and income and loss generated by the extreme loss guarantee pool are shared according to the investor's fund. In this way, social loss compensation in extreme situations can be solved.
The embodiment of the application provides an optional complete process of work review as an example to explain the decentralized work review method:
s1, the author creates the works, uploads the works to a decentralized creation platform, and pays enough examination cost in advance;
s2, examination stage:
s21, the creator describes the technical field type of the work as accurately as possible;
s22, presetting conservative social loss value
；
S23, repeating the following review process until jumping out:
s231, the work is examined by N examiners familiar with the technical field, and the examiners need to answer whether the social loss value of the work is less than or not
"this problem;
s232, after the examinee finishes examining the works, the platform obtains N answers, and a first proportion p occupied by the answers with the answers smaller than the answers is determined;
s233, if p is larger than the preset threshold value
When the inspection is finished, the inspection is carried out through the round
Jumping out of circulation as the estimated social loss value; otherwise, the conservative social loss value is assigned as the value without passing the round of examination
And continuing to the next round of examination. Finally determining the estimated social loss value as
；
S3, guarantee auction stage:
s31, directly pledge by the creator
The deposit of (2); alternatively, the first and second electrodes may be,
and S32, dividing the guarantee responsibility into S sub-guarantee responsibilities to carry out auction:
s321, creating pledge
The deposit of (2);
s322, the platform auctions the sub-guarantee responsibility, and the content of the sub-guarantee responsibility is the interval caused by the undertaking works
The social loss value of (1/s), each guarantor undertakes at most one sub-guaranty responsibility;
s323, the creator pays the first guarantee fee to the S-guarantor according to the auction result;
s33, the creator pays a second guarantee fee to purchase the guarantee provided by the extreme loss guarantee pool, and the content of the guarantee is the interval caused by the undertaking works
The value of the social loss.
In the embodiment of the application, after receiving the works uploaded by the authoring nodes, the decentralized authoring platform determines target review nodes from a plurality of review nodes based on the types of the works, determines the estimated social loss value corresponding to the works through the target review nodes, and meanwhile, the target review nodes can collect review cost provided by the authoring nodes; and then, the platform auctions guarantee responsibility for the works, determines a target guarantee node based on the auction result, and the target guarantee node receives a first guarantee fee provided by the creation node and provides guarantee responsibility for the works, wherein the target guarantee node and the creation node need to provide compensation for the actual social loss value when the actual social loss value generated by the works does not exceed the estimated social loss value. The production is censored through the censored nodes, and the production is guaranteed through the guarantee nodes, so that the decentralized creation platform can efficiently censore the production and compensate social loss caused by the efficient censored production while guaranteeing the freedom degree of uploading the production by the creation nodes, and the technical problem that the production on the decentralized creation platform is lack of an effective censoring mechanism and adverse social influence is easily caused in the related technology is solved.
Example 2
According to an embodiment of the present application, there is also provided a decentralized work review apparatus for implementing the decentralized work review method described above, as shown in fig. 3, the apparatus at least includes a receiving module 31, a review module 32, and a vouching module 33, wherein:
and the receiving module 31 is configured to receive the works uploaded by the authoring node.
Wherein, the authoring node mainly refers to the individual author who uploads the work at decentralized authoring platform, and it uploads the work to the platform in order to obtain the volume of playing for interest or benefit, and the content of uploading the work can include: entertainment short videos, teaching videos, music sharing, photos, novels and other multimedia contents.
And the examination module 32 is used for determining a target examination node from the plurality of examination nodes based on the type of the work, and determining the estimated social loss value corresponding to the work through the target examination node, wherein the target examination node is also used for collecting examination fees provided by the creation node.
The review node mainly refers to reviewers reviewing the works on the decentralized creation platform, and the reviewers may be common users selected in the review stage, and the users review the works through selling labor force to obtain review fees.
Since works uploaded by different creators relate to a plurality of technical fields, and each reviewer has one or more technical fields with his or her own proficiency, in order to ensure the reliability of the review result, when a certain work is reviewed, the work needs to be distributed to reviewers familiar with the technical fields of the work as much as possible. In some optional embodiments of the present application, a technology domain type corresponding to a work provided by an authoring node may be obtained, and then a first preset number of target censoring nodes may be determined from a plurality of censoring nodes associated with the technology domain type.
When the works are examined, a conservative social loss value can be preset according to experience, and then the following examination flows are repeatedly executed:
and S1, examining the works through the target examination nodes, and estimating whether the social loss value of the works is smaller than the conservative social loss value.
Specifically, a review opinion indicating whether the social loss value of each target review node for the work is less than the conservative social loss value or not can be obtained; determining a first proportion of a first type of target examination node in all target examination nodes, wherein the examination opinions of the first type of target examination node are that the social loss value of the work is smaller than the conservative social loss value; when the first proportion is larger than a preset threshold value, the social loss value of the estimated work is smaller than the conservative social loss value; and when the first proportion is not greater than the preset threshold value, the social loss value of the estimated work is not less than the conservative social loss value.
And S2, when the social loss value of the estimated work is smaller than the conservative social loss value, directly taking the conservative social loss value as the estimated social loss value, and ending the examination process.
S3, when the social loss value of the predicted work is not less than the conservative social loss value, the conservative social loss value is calculated based on a preset calculation mode, the calculation result is assigned to the conservative social loss value, the review process is executed again, and the step S1 is executed again. The preset calculation mode can be that the current conservative social loss value is doubled during each calculation.
When the examination fee is determined, because only a small part of the social loss value of the works can be revealed later, but more social loss values of the works are unknown, and the examination fee cannot be determined according to the social loss values of the works, the embodiment of the application provides an examination fee calculation mode for designing and encouraging honest reporting according to the examination of examiners on the works. For example, the platform packs not less than 4 works in the same technical field into a checking task each time and determines a target checker, on the basis, each checker is guaranteed to check the same work at most once, and finally, a determinant mutual information score is calculated according to a checking result and checking cost is calculated in a proportional manner.
A vouching module 33 for auctioning vouching responsibilities for the work and determining a target vouching node based on the auction result, wherein the target vouching node is configured to receive a first vouching fee provided by the authoring node and provide vouching responsibilities for the work, and the vouching responsibilities include: and when the actual social loss value generated by the work does not exceed the estimated social loss value, the target guarantee node and the creation node together provide compensation for the actual social loss value.
The guarantee node mainly refers to a guarantee person who guarantees the work on a centralized creation platform, and is usually a professional user who bids the guarantee responsibility of the work in a guarantee auction stage, and needs to pay a certain deposit in advance to become a guarantee person, and the guarantee person can submit a quote for any work waiting for guarantee to be competitive, wherein the quote is a guarantee fee which needs to be charged by the guarantee person to bear social loss value possibly generated by the work.
In view of the greater risk that a work is held if it is held by a vouchers, in some alternative embodiments of the present application, a second predetermined number of sub-vouching responsibilities may be determined based on the vouching responsibilities, including: when the actual social loss value generated by the work is between the preset conservative social loss value and the estimated social loss value, the target guarantee node compensates for a second proportion of the difference value between the actual social loss value and the preset conservative social loss value, the second proportion can be set according to a second preset number, and the second preset number can be set according to the estimated social loss value of the work; the sub-vouching responsibilities are then auctioned to a plurality of vouching nodes, and a target vouching node is determined based on the results of the auctions.
During the wagering responsibility auction period, a deterministic incentive compatible wagering auction mode may be used, such as a second preset number of wagerers with the lowest bid being set to receive wagering responsibility. Specifically, auction offers of a plurality of guarantee nodes for the sub-guarantee responsibilities can be obtained, and the auction offers are sorted from low to high; determining the guarantee nodes corresponding to the auction bids with the second preset number in the front sequence as target guarantee nodes; and collecting a deposit to the target security node based on the estimated social loss value, and determining a first security fee which needs to be provided to the target security node by the creation node based on the auction quotation of the target security node.
In some optional embodiments of the present application, the decentralized work review device further comprises: an extreme underwriting module 34 for establishing an extreme loss underwriting pool, wherein the extreme loss underwriting pool is used for collecting a second underwriting fee provided by the authoring node and a third underwriting fee provided by the investment node; when the actual social loss value generated by the work exceeds the estimated social loss value, providing compensation for the difference value between the actual social loss value and the estimated social loss value; and distributing the income to the investment nodes when the extremely loss guarantee pool generates the income.
The extreme loss guarantee pool is a central fund pool and is used for paying the social loss value exceeding the expected social loss value of a reviewer caused by the work in a purse base, providing guarantee for all the works in the platform and charging a fixed second guarantee fee enough to be ignored for each work. The investment node is an investor in a decentralized authoring platform, wherein any user can serve as an investor to fund the extreme loss guarantee pool, namely, a third guarantee cost is provided, and income and loss generated by the extreme loss guarantee pool are shared according to the investor's fund. In this way, social loss compensation in extreme situations can be solved.
It should be noted that, each module in the decentralized work review device in the embodiment of the present application corresponds to each implementation step of the decentralized work review method in embodiment 1 one to one, and since the detailed description is already performed in embodiment 1, details that are not shown in this embodiment may refer to embodiment 1, and are not described here again.
Example 3
According to an embodiment of the present application, there is also provided a nonvolatile storage medium including a stored program, wherein a device in which the nonvolatile storage medium is located is controlled to execute the decentralized work review method of embodiment 1 when the program is executed.
Optionally, the apparatus in which the non-volatile storage medium is controlled when the program is running executes the following steps: receiving the works uploaded by the creation nodes; determining a target review node from the plurality of review nodes based on the type of the work, and determining the estimated social loss value corresponding to the work through the target review node, wherein the target review node is also used for collecting review cost provided by the creation node; auctioning a vouching responsibility for the work and determining a target vouching node based on the auction result, wherein the target vouching node is configured to receive a first vouching fee provided by the authoring node and provide a vouching responsibility for the work, the vouching responsibility comprising: and when the actual social loss value generated by the work does not exceed the estimated social loss value, the target guarantee node and the creation node together provide compensation for the actual social loss value.
According to an embodiment of the present application, there is also provided a processor configured to execute a program, where the program executes the decentralized work review method according to embodiment 1.
Optionally, the program executes when executing the following steps: receiving the works uploaded by the creation nodes; determining a target review node from the plurality of review nodes based on the type of the work, and determining the estimated social loss value corresponding to the work through the target review node, wherein the target review node is also used for collecting review cost provided by the creation node; auctioning a vouching responsibility for the work and determining a target vouching node based on the auction result, wherein the target vouching node is configured to receive a first vouching fee provided by the authoring node and provide a vouching responsibility for the work, the vouching responsibility comprising: and when the actual social loss value generated by the work does not exceed the estimated social loss value, the target guarantee node and the creation node together provide compensation for the actual social loss value.
The above-mentioned serial numbers of the embodiments of the present application are merely for description and do not represent the merits of the embodiments.
In the above embodiments of the present application, the descriptions of the respective embodiments have respective emphasis, and for parts that are not described in detail in a certain embodiment, reference may be made to related descriptions of other embodiments.
In the embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed technology can be implemented in other ways. The above-described embodiments of the apparatus are merely illustrative, and for example, a division of a unit may be a division of a logic function, and an actual implementation may have another division, for example, a plurality of units or components may be combined or may be integrated into another system, or some features may be omitted, or may not be executed. In addition, the shown or discussed mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection may be an indirect coupling or communication connection through some interfaces, units or modules, and may be in an electrical or other form.
The units described as separate parts may or may not be physically separate, and parts displayed as units may or may not be physical units, may be located in one place, or may be distributed on a plurality of units. Some or all of the units can be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of the embodiment.
In addition, functional units in the embodiments of the present application may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist alone physically, or two or more units are integrated into one unit. The integrated unit can be realized in a form of hardware, and can also be realized in a form of a software functional unit.
The integrated unit, if implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as a stand-alone product, may be stored in a computer readable storage medium. Based on such understanding, the technical solution of the present application may be substantially implemented or contributed to by the prior art, or all or part of the technical solution may be embodied in a software product, which is stored in a storage medium and includes instructions for causing a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a server, or a network device) to execute all or part of the steps of the method of the embodiments of the present application. And the aforementioned storage medium includes: a U-disk, a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a Random Access Memory (RAM), a removable hard disk, a magnetic or optical disk, and other various media capable of storing program codes.
The foregoing is only a preferred embodiment of the present application and it should be noted that those skilled in the art can make several improvements and modifications without departing from the principle of the present application, and these improvements and modifications should also be considered as the protection scope of the present application.
Claims (10)
1. A method of de-centralizing work review, comprising:
receiving the works uploaded by the creation nodes;
determining a target review node from a plurality of review nodes based on the type of the work, and determining the estimated social loss value corresponding to the work through the target review node, wherein the target review node is also used for collecting review fees provided by the creation node;
auctioning a vouching responsibility for said work and determining a target vouching node based on the auction result, wherein said target vouching node is configured to receive a first vouching fee provided by said authoring node and to provide said vouching responsibility for said work, said vouching responsibility comprising: and when the actual social loss value generated by the work does not exceed the estimated social loss value, the target guarantee node and the creation node together provide compensation for the actual social loss value.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
establishing an extreme loss guarantee pool, wherein the extreme loss guarantee pool is used for collecting a second guarantee fee provided by the authoring node and a third guarantee fee provided by the investment node; when the actual social loss value generated by the work exceeds the estimated social loss value, providing compensation for the difference value between the actual social loss value and the estimated social loss value; and when the extreme loss guarantee pool generates income, distributing the income to the investment nodes.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein determining a target censoring node from a plurality of censoring nodes based on the type of the work comprises:
acquiring a technical field type corresponding to the work provided by the creation node;
determining a first preset number of the target review nodes from a plurality of review nodes associated with the technology field type.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein determining, by the target review node, a projected social loss value corresponding to the work comprises:
presetting a conservative social loss value, and repeatedly executing the following examination flows:
examining the works through the target examination nodes, and estimating whether the social loss value of the works is smaller than the conservative social loss value;
when the estimated social loss value of the work is smaller than the conservative social loss value, taking the conservative social loss value as the estimated social loss value, and ending the review process;
and when the social loss value of the work is estimated to be not less than the conservative social loss value, calculating the conservative social loss value based on a preset calculation mode, assigning a calculation result to the conservative social loss value, and executing the examination process again.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein reviewing the work through the target review node to predict whether the social loss value of the work is less than the conservative social loss value comprises:
obtaining a review opinion of each target review node on whether the social loss value of the work is smaller than the conservative social loss value;
determining a first proportion of a first type of target examination node in all the target examination nodes, wherein the examination opinions of the first type of target examination node are that the social loss value of the works is smaller than the conservative social loss value;
when the first proportion is larger than a preset threshold value, predicting that the social loss value of the work is smaller than the conservative social loss value;
and when the first ratio is not greater than a preset threshold value, estimating that the social loss value of the work is not less than the conservative social loss value.
6. The method of claim 4, wherein the act of providing compensation to the actual social loss value by the target vouching node and the authoring node when the actual social loss value contributed by the work does not exceed the projected social loss value comprises:
when the actual social loss value generated by the work does not exceed the preset conservative social loss value, the actual social loss value is compensated by the creation node;
when the actual social loss value generated by the work is between the preset conservative social loss value and the estimated social loss value, the creation node compensates for the preset conservative social loss value, and the target guarantee node compensates for a difference between the actual social loss value and the preset conservative social loss value.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein auctioning vouching responsibility for the work and determining a target vouching node based on auction results, comprises:
determining a second preset number of sub-vouching responsibilities based on the vouching responsibilities, the sub-vouching responsibilities including: when the actual social loss value generated by the work is between the preset conservative social loss value and the estimated social loss value, the target guarantee node compensates for a second proportion of a difference value between the actual social loss value and the preset conservative social loss value;
auctioning the sub-guarantee responsibilities to a plurality of guarantee nodes, acquiring auction bids of the plurality of guarantee nodes aiming at the sub-guarantee responsibilities, and sequencing the auction bids from low to high;
determining the guarantee node corresponding to the auction bid of the second preset number in the front sequence as the target guarantee node;
and collecting a deposit from the target security node based on the estimated social loss value, and determining the first security fee which needs to be provided by the creation node to the target security node based on the auction quotation of the target security node.
8. A decentralized work review device, comprising:
the receiving module is used for receiving the works uploaded by the creation nodes;
the examination module is used for determining a target examination node from a plurality of examination nodes based on the type of the work and determining the estimated social loss value corresponding to the work through the target examination node, wherein the target examination node is also used for collecting examination cost provided by the creation node;
a vouching module for auctioning a vouching responsibility for said work and determining a target vouching node based on the auction result, wherein said target vouching node is configured to receive a first vouching fee provided by said authoring node and provide said vouching responsibility for said work, said vouching responsibility comprising: and when the actual social loss value generated by the work does not exceed the estimated social loss value, the target guarantee node and the creation node together provide compensation for the actual social loss value.
9. A non-volatile storage medium, comprising a stored program, wherein the program, when executed, controls a device on which the non-volatile storage medium is located to perform the decentralized work review method of any one of claims 1 to 7.
10. A processor, wherein the processor is configured to execute a program, wherein the program when executed performs the decentralized work review method of any one of claims 1 to 7.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210407429.7A CN114493811A (en) | 2022-04-19 | 2022-04-19 | Decentralized work examination method and device |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210407429.7A CN114493811A (en) | 2022-04-19 | 2022-04-19 | Decentralized work examination method and device |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN114493811A true CN114493811A (en) | 2022-05-13 |
Family
ID=81489647
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210407429.7A Pending CN114493811A (en) | 2022-04-19 | 2022-04-19 | Decentralized work examination method and device |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN114493811A (en) |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107209910A (en) * | 2015-03-26 | 2017-09-26 | 西村慎司 | Tripartite's the Internet auctions |
| CN107679976A (en) * | 2017-09-28 | 2018-02-09 | 电子科技大学 | A kind of auction system based on block chain |
| CN109002525A (en) * | 2018-07-13 | 2018-12-14 | 北京微播视界科技有限公司 | Processing method, device, terminal device and the storage medium of content of platform |
| WO2020104806A1 (en) * | 2018-11-21 | 2020-05-28 | Loopme Ltd | Real-time bidding |
-
2022
- 2022-04-19 CN CN202210407429.7A patent/CN114493811A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107209910A (en) * | 2015-03-26 | 2017-09-26 | 西村慎司 | Tripartite's the Internet auctions |
| CN107679976A (en) * | 2017-09-28 | 2018-02-09 | 电子科技大学 | A kind of auction system based on block chain |
| CN109002525A (en) * | 2018-07-13 | 2018-12-14 | 北京微播视界科技有限公司 | Processing method, device, terminal device and the storage medium of content of platform |
| WO2020104806A1 (en) * | 2018-11-21 | 2020-05-28 | Loopme Ltd | Real-time bidding |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Mehra | Antitrust and the robo-seller: Competition in the time of algorithms | |
| WO2019100084A1 (en) | Decentralized autonomous evaluation engine for intellectual property assets | |
| CN110928951A (en) | Data sharing and arbitration method based on block chain | |
| Spier et al. | Contracting on litigation | |
| CN108961055A (en) | A kind of rewards and punishments method, apparatus, equipment and the storage medium of block common recognition | |
| Parente et al. | Bargaining behavior and the tragedy of the anticommons | |
| US20140201021A1 (en) | System and method for managing selelction of prescription drug plans | |
| Lazareva et al. | The Innovative Blockchain Technology in the Sharing Economy Subject Decision Making | |
| CN113393321A (en) | Financial wind control method based on block chain | |
| CN110610397B (en) | Method and device for processing offer in credit item | |
| CN108280651A (en) | A kind of merchandise items checking method, apparatus and system | |
| Bothos et al. | A collaborative information aggregation system for idea management | |
| Lang et al. | Designing markets for co-production of digital culture goods | |
| CN114493811A (en) | Decentralized work examination method and device | |
| Carbonneau et al. | A multi-attribute bidding strategy for a single-attribute auction marketplace | |
| Liu et al. | An incentive mechanism designed for e-marketplaces with limited inventory | |
| Voigt et al. | Assessing strategic behavior in name-your-own-price markets | |
| Fang et al. | Resolving access conflicts: an auction-based incentive approach | |
| Gerding et al. | Multi-attribute bilateral bargaining in a one-to-many setting | |
| CN112541732A (en) | Intelligent bidding contract generation method and device and readable storage medium | |
| CN112734238A (en) | Weak-centralized production and consumption user electric quantity coordination method and system based on block chain | |
| CN110570296A (en) | Risk assessment method and device in credit project | |
| WO2021214828A1 (en) | Selection device, selection method, and selection program | |
| Bauer et al. | Value Capturing from Tokenized Asset Histories | |
| JP2011096243A (en) | Method and apparatus for uniform price bond auction with open outcry format and extendible bidding round rule |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |