CN114462960A - Automatic qualification auditing method and system in electronic bidding - Google Patents
Automatic qualification auditing method and system in electronic bidding Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN114462960A CN114462960A CN202210015254.5A CN202210015254A CN114462960A CN 114462960 A CN114462960 A CN 114462960A CN 202210015254 A CN202210015254 A CN 202210015254A CN 114462960 A CN114462960 A CN 114462960A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- bidding
- qualification
- file
- document
- bid
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
- G06Q10/103—Workflow collaboration or project management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/10—File systems; File servers
- G06F16/14—Details of searching files based on file metadata
- G06F16/148—File search processing
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
- G06F16/903—Querying
- G06F16/90335—Query processing
- G06F16/90344—Query processing by using string matching techniques
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Library & Information Science (AREA)
- Computational Linguistics (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a qualification auditing method in electronic bidding, which comprises the steps of constructing a bidding validity auditing model, analyzing extracted bidding documents and data, and obtaining the validity of the current bid of a bidding enterprise; constructing a bidding security auditing model, and identifying and uniquely authenticating related data of a bidding system to obtain the security of the current bidding of the bidding document; establishing a bidding matching auditing model, and analyzing the catalog of the bidding document to obtain the matching of the bidding request content and the contents of the bidding document; establishing a bidding authenticity auditing model, recognizing and extracting key information of qualification and certificate pictures in a bidding document by using an OCR (optical character recognition), and verifying authenticity to confirm the bidding qualification and the authenticity of the document; and outputting the bidding qualification auditing result of the current bidding enterprise and sending an automatic alarm for the unqualified condition. The method greatly improves the validity, accuracy, precision and efficiency of the audit, and reduces the time and cost of manual audit.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of data analysis and electronic bidding, in particular to an automatic qualification auditing scheme in electronic bidding.
Background
Social development and engineering construction cannot leave with bidding and bidding. In recent years, electronic bidding has become more and more widespread with the deep integration of the internet and the bidding field. The electronic bidding and tendering can improve the bidding and purchasing efficiency, reduce the time, labor and material cost and workload of the bidding link and reduce the risk of human intervention in the bidding process. However, in bidding activities, the problems of bidding, counterfeiting, information mismatch and the like cannot be completely avoided, which leads to the development of the bidding field in different degrees.
The qualification auditing work before bid evaluation is a key link in the bidding process, the qualification auditing work is usually carried out manually, the problems of low auditing efficiency and high labor cost are prominent, and a method for bidding qualification auditing in electronic bidding is lacked currently, so that an intelligent and efficient automatic technical scheme capable of deeply analyzing text information is needed.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to solve the defects in the prior art, the invention provides an electronic bidding qualification auditing scheme, which can perform qualification auditing work more comprehensively, objectively, efficiently and accurately, avoid the problems of bidding, serial bidding, counterfeiting, information mismatching and the like to a certain extent, reduce invalid bidding, improve bidding efficiency and precision and save work amount, and has a good auxiliary effect.
In order to achieve the above object, the technical solution of the present invention provides an automatic qualification auditing method in electronic bidding, which includes the following steps:
step 1, establishing a bidding validity auditing model, and analyzing the extracted bidding document files and data to obtain the validity of the current bid of the bidding enterprise;
step 2, constructing a bidding security auditing model, and identifying and uniquely authenticating relevant data of the bidding system to obtain the security of the current bidding of the bidding document;
step 3, constructing a bidding matching auditing model, and analyzing the catalog of the bidding document to obtain the matching of the bidding request content and the contents of the bidding document;
step 4, establishing a bidding authenticity auditing model, recognizing and extracting key information of qualification and certificate pictures in the bidding document by using an OCR (optical character recognition), and verifying authenticity to confirm the bidding qualification and the authenticity of the document;
and 5, outputting the bidding qualification auditing result of the current bidding enterprise according to the analysis result of the step, and sending an automatic alarm to the unqualified condition.
Moreover, the effectiveness auditing model in the step 1 is to automatically conduct qualification pre-auditing, bidding document auditing, effective time auditing and enterprise credit auditing on bidding enterprises so as to realize effectiveness auditing, and the implementation process in the step 1 comprises the following substeps,
A) compiling qualification prequalification, checking a qualification prequalification application letter submitted in a bidding system, a legal representative person identification, an authorization submission book, an applicant basic condition table, a recent financial condition table, a recent similar project condition table, a project condition table under construction and new acceptance, a recent litigation and arbitration condition material, confirming whether a prebidding enterprise has qualification, and marking a result;
B) the method comprises the following steps of bidding document examination, checking whether a bidding system receives a bidding function document and a guarantee fund document of a bidding enterprise, confirming whether the bidding enterprise uploads a necessary bidding document, and marking a result;
C) the effective time examination is carried out, the time for uploading the bid documents and the time for mailing paper-edition bid materials by enterprises in the bidding system are checked, the time is compared with the preset bid deadline time, whether the bid documents are effective or not is confirmed, and the results are marked;
D) enterprise credit examination, inquiring the credit condition of the bidding enterprise through public information, checking whether the credit condition of the bidding enterprise accords with the requirements of bidding documents and national laws and regulations, and marking results;
E) and obtaining a bidding validity auditing result according to the marking results of the steps A), B), C) and D).
Moreover, the safety auditing model in the step 2 is used for automatically identifying the legality of the behavior of the tenderer in the bidding process, uniquely authenticating the tenderer before and after the tenderer's bidding document, ensuring the state safety of the bidding document in the bidding system and avoiding the bidding document from being modified or maliciously tampered by halfway collusion, and the implementation process in the step 2 comprises the following substeps,
A) acquiring identity authentication information and authority information of a login person from a bidding system, comparing and confirming the information with system preset information, ensuring the safety and the legality of login behaviors, and marking results;
B) when a bidder uploads a bid file from a bidding system, the unique identification code of the bid file is obtained through an MD5 algorithm and is stored and encrypted along with the file, the unique identification code of the bid file is calculated through an MD5 algorithm again during bid opening, the unique identification codes of the file are compared, the unique identification codes of the file are completely consistent, the file which is bid by the bidder is completely consistent with a bid opening field file, serial modification and malicious tampering do not occur in the midway, the bid file is decrypted, and the comparison result of the identification codes of the file is marked;
C) and obtaining a bidding safety auditing result according to the marking results in the steps A) and B).
Moreover, the matching auditing model of the step 3 is to calculate the matching of the bidding file name and the matching of the bidding file directory by character matching, and the step 3 implementation process comprises the following sub-steps,
A) according to the requirements of the bidding documents, respectively extracting the keywords alpha in the bidding document names1,α2,...,αmForm a keyword list [ alpha ] of the file names to be bid on1,α2,...,αm]Where m is the number of keywords in the bid document name, αi≠αjWhen the key word label i is not equal to j and i, j belongs to {1,2, 3.. eta., m }, inputting the importance sequence of each file, and calculating a corresponding file preference weight list [ k ] by utilizing an analytic hierarchy process1,k2,...,km]Wherein k is1+k2+...+km=1;
B) According to the requirement of the bidding document, extracting keywords beta of each grade title in the contents of the bidding document1,β2,...,βnTo form a bidding catalog gatewayList of key words [ beta ]1,β2,...,βn]Where n is the number of keywords in the bid catalog, βi≠βjWhen the key word label i is not equal to j and i, j belongs to {1,2, 3.. once, n }, inputting the importance sequence of each title, and calculating a corresponding title preference weight list [ l ] by utilizing an analytic hierarchy process1,l2,...,ln]Wherein l is1+l2+...+ln=1;
C) Extracting file names of the bidding files, setting M file names to form a bidding file name list [ a ]1,a2,...,aM]Extracting the file directory of the bid document, setting N file directories to form bid document directory list [ b1,b2,...,bN];
D) Will bid on the file name keyword list [ alpha ]1,α2,...,αm]Each keyword a ofiAnd a list of bid filenames [ a ]1,a2,...,aM]Each file name a inIPerforming character matching ifThe file name keyword alpha isiCorresponding file preference weight kiOutputting;
E) and calculating the file name matching property of the bid file according to the following file name matching calculation formula:
matching property of file name ∑ ki*100%
F) Will bid on the file directory keyword list [ beta ]1,β2,...,βn]Each keyword of (b)jAnd a list of bid filenames [ b ]1,b2,...,bN]Each file directory b inJMatch is made ifThen the directory key beta is usedjCorresponding title preference weight ljOutputting;
G) and calculating the file directory matching of the bid file according to the following file directory matching calculation formula:
file directory matching ═ Σ lj*100%
H) And respectively comparing the file name matching performance and the file directory matching performance with corresponding preset thresholds, and outputting a matching performance checking result.
Moreover, the authenticity verification model in the step 4 utilizes OCR to identify and extract key information of qualification and certificate pictures in the bidding document, automatically carries out security verification and ensures the authenticity of the bidding qualification and the document, and the implementation process in the step 4 comprises the following substeps,
A) scanning the bidding text by utilizing OCR (optical character recognition), analyzing and processing the image file to obtain the qualification name, the qualification number and the name information of a qualification bearer in the qualification picture in the bidding file, and storing the qualification name, the qualification number and the name information as a qualification list;
B) uploading each item of information of the qualification list to a corresponding checking website, checking the authenticity, and outputting a checking result;
C) inputting the name and qualification list of the bidding enterprise into a qualification database of the bidding enterprise for filing;
D) when the bidding enterprises participate in bidding, the steps A) to C) can be carried out, and qualification supplement or new enterprise filing is carried out;
E) the minimum requirement qualification required by the current bidding project is a necessary element, when the enterprise qualification is higher than the bidding requirement qualification or has additional high-quality qualification as a preferred element, the enterprise qualification is compared with the qualification required by the bidding, and the qualification grade of the bidding enterprise is output;
F) and obtaining qualification checking results and qualification grades of the bidding enterprises according to the steps A) to E).
Furthermore, the step 5 implementation process includes the following sub-steps,
A) respectively comparing the validity audit result, the safety audit result, the matching audit result and the authenticity audit result of the bidding enterprise with corresponding thresholds or conditions, and outputting the qualification audit result of the bidding enterprise;
B) and calculating qualification auditing results of all enterprises, wherein if the number of the enterprises passing the qualification auditing is more than or equal to a preset threshold value, the bidding of the item is effective and can be subjected to bid evaluation, otherwise, the bidding is ineffective and the bid is required to be re-tendered.
The invention provides an automatic qualification auditing system in electronic bidding, which is used for realizing the automatic qualification auditing method in electronic bidding.
And, including the following modules,
the first module is used for constructing a bidding effectiveness auditing model, analyzing the extracted bidding document files and data and obtaining the effectiveness of the current bidding of the bidding enterprise;
the second module is used for constructing a bidding security auditing model, identifying and uniquely authenticating relevant data of the bidding system and obtaining the security of the current bidding of the bidding document;
the third module is used for constructing a bidding matching auditing model, analyzing the catalog of the bidding document and obtaining the matching of the bidding request content and the bidding document content;
the fourth module is used for constructing a bidding authenticity auditing model, recognizing and extracting key information of qualification and certificate pictures in the bidding document by using an OCR (optical character recognition), verifying authenticity and confirming the bidding qualification and the authenticity of the document;
and a fifth module for outputting the result of checking the tendering qualification of the current bidding enterprise according to the analysis result of the step and sending an automatic alarm for the unqualified condition.
Or, the system comprises a processor and a memory, wherein the memory is used for storing program instructions, and the processor is used for calling the stored instructions in the memory to execute the qualification automatic auditing method in the electronic bidding.
Or, the system comprises a readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, and when the computer program is executed, the method for automatically auditing qualification in electronic bidding is realized.
By the scheme, automatic auditing of electronic bidding qualification is realized, the effectiveness, accuracy, precision and efficiency of auditing bidding enterprises and bidding documents are greatly improved, the time and cost of manual auditing are reduced, the auditing method is more comprehensive, the auditing result is more objective, and the method is strong in applicability and easy to use and popularize.
The scheme of the invention is simple and convenient to implement, has strong practicability, solves the problems of low practicability and inconvenient practical application of the related technology, can improve the user experience, and has important market value.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a schematic structural diagram of a composition structure of an automatic qualification auditing method in electronic bidding according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solution of the present invention is specifically described below with reference to the accompanying drawings and examples.
In the embodiment of the present invention, as shown in fig. 1, an automatic qualification auditing method in electronic bidding includes the following steps:
step 1, constructing an effectiveness auditing model, analyzing the extracted bidding document files and data to obtain the effectiveness of the current bid of the bidding enterprise:
the effectiveness auditing model is used for carrying out qualification prequalification, bidding document auditing, effective time auditing and enterprise credit auditing on bidding enterprises, thereby realizing effectiveness auditing.
The preferred implementation procedure adopted by the embodiment is as follows:
A) compiling qualification prequalification, checking materials such as qualification prequalification application letters submitted in a bidding system, legal representative person identification, authorized committee, an applicant basic situation table, a recent financial situation table, a recent completed similar project situation table, a project situation table under construction and new acceptance, recent litigation and arbitration situation and the like, confirming whether a pre-bidding enterprise has qualification, and marking a result;
B) the method comprises the following steps of bidding document examination, checking whether a bidding system receives a bidding function document and a guarantee fund document of a bidding enterprise, confirming whether the bidding enterprise uploads a necessary bidding document, and marking a result;
C) checking the effective time, checking the time of uploading the bidding documents and the time of mailing paper-edition bidding materials by enterprises in the bidding system, comparing the time with the preset bidding deadline time, confirming whether the bidding documents have effectiveness, and marking the result;
D) enterprise credit examination, inquiring the credit condition of the bidding enterprise through public information, checking whether the credit condition of the bidding enterprise accords with the requirements of bidding documents and national laws and regulations, and marking results;
E) and obtaining a bidding validity auditing result according to the marking results of the steps A), B), C) and D).
Step 2, constructing a security auditing model, identifying and uniquely authenticating relevant data of the bidding system to obtain the security of the current bidding of the bidding document:
the safety auditing model is used for identifying the legality of the behavior of the tenderer in the bidding process, uniquely authenticating the tendered and bid files, ensuring the state safety of the bid files in the bidding system and avoiding that the bid files are not subjected to through modification or malicious tampering midway.
A) Acquiring identity authentication information and authority information of a login person from a bidding system, comparing and confirming the information with system preset information, ensuring the safety and the legality of login behaviors, and marking results;
B) when a bidder uploads a bid file in the bidding system, the system acquires a unique identification code of the bid file through an MD5 algorithm and stores and encrypts the unique identification code along with the file, the bidding system calculates the unique identification code of the bid file through an MD5 algorithm again when opening the bid, the unique identification code of the file is completely consistent, the file when the bidder puts the bid is completely consistent with a bidding site file, serial modification and malicious tampering of a hacker technology between a tenderer and the bidder do not occur midway, the system decrypts the bid file, and a comparison result of the file identification code is marked;
the MD5 algorithm, a widely used cryptographic hash function, generates a 128-bit (16-byte) hash value to ensure the integrity of the message transmission. The embodiment preferably uses the MD5 algorithm to obtain the unique identification code of the bid document.
C) And obtaining a bidding safety auditing result according to the marking results in the steps A) and B).
Step 3, constructing a matching auditing model, analyzing the catalog of the bidding document to obtain the matching of the bidding request content and the contents of the bidding document:
the matching auditing model calculates the matching of the bidding file name and the bidding file directory by character matching, and the step 3 comprises the following steps:
according to the requirements of the bidding documents, respectively extracting the keywords alpha in the bidding document names1,α2,...,αmForm a keyword list [ alpha ] of the file names to be bid on1,α2,...,αm]In which α isi≠αjWhen i is not equal to j and the keyword label i, j belongs to {1,2, 3.., m }, in specific implementation, the importance sequence of each file can be input according to pre-obtained evaluation expert experience, and a corresponding file preference weight list [ k ] is calculated by utilizing an analytic hierarchy process1,k2,...,km]Wherein k is1+k2+...+km1 is ═ 1; wherein m is the number of keywords in the bidding document name; the analytic hierarchy process is realized in the prior art, and the invention is not repeated;
according to the requirement of the bidding document, extracting keywords beta of each grade title in the contents of the bidding document1,β2,...,βnForm a keyword list [ beta ] of the bidding catalog1,β2,...,βn]Wherein beta isi≠βjWhen i is not equal to j and i, j belongs to {1,2, 3.,. n }, inputting the importance sequence of each title according to the pre-obtained experience of the evaluation expert, and calculating a corresponding title preference weight list [ l ] by utilizing an analytic hierarchy process1,l2,...,ln]Wherein l is1+l2+...+ln1 is ═ 1; wherein n is the number of keywords in the bidding catalog;
extracting file names of the bidding files, setting M file names to form a bidding file name list [ a ]1,a2,...,aM]Extracting the file directory of the bid document, setting N file directories to form bid document directory list [ b1,b2,...,bN];
Will bid on the file name keyword list [ alpha ]1,α2,...,αm]Each keyword a ofiAnd a list of bid filenames [ a ]1,a2,...,aM]Each file name inaIPerforming character matching ifThe file name keyword alpha isiCorresponding file preference weight kiOutputting;
and calculating the file name matching property of the bid file according to the following file name matching calculation formula:
matching property of file name ∑ ki*100%,
The formula is that all matched keywords alpha are successfully matchediCorresponding file preference weight kiAnd accumulating.
Will bid on the file directory keyword list [ beta ]1,β2,...,βn]Each keyword of (b)jAnd a list of bid filenames [ b ]1,b2,...,bN]Each file directory b inJMatch is made ifThen the directory key beta is usedjCorresponding title preference weight ljOutputting;
and calculating the file directory matching of the bid file according to the following file directory matching calculation formula:
file directory matching ═ Σ lj*100%,
The formula is that all matched keywords are matched successfullyjCorresponding title preference weight ljAnd accumulating.
And respectively comparing the file name matching performance and the file directory matching performance with corresponding preset thresholds (the value-taking principle of the thresholds is usually related to the actual conditions of the project, the file name matching performance threshold is 100% and the directory matching performance threshold is 90% -95% in principle), and outputting a matching performance auditing result.
Document matching is the document requested for bidding, whether all bidders have, and often not few documents, so it is reasonable to set the prediction to 100%. The directory matching is whether the directory in the standard book is consistent with the required directory, and usually the number of the line numbers (i.e. keywords) in the directory can reach 20-30, and the influence of one or two fewer lines is not large, so that the value is preferably 90% -95%. In practical operation, the threshold value may be specifically set in advance by the tenderer according to the tendering experience, the project type and other specific conditions.
For ease of reference, step 3 implementation in the example is provided as follows:
A) according to the requirements of bidding documents, keywords in the name of the bidding document, such as ' bidding quotation ', ' business part ' and ' technical part ', are respectively provided to form a bidding document name keyword list 1[ ' quotation ', ' business part ' and ' technical part ], the importance ranking of each document is obtained according to the experience of bid evaluation experts, and a corresponding document preference weight list [0.3, 0.2 and 0.5] is calculated by using an analytic hierarchy process;
B) extracting keywords of each grade of title in the contents of the bidding document, such as ' bidding letter ', ' technical parameter ' and ' achievement ', respectively according to the requirements of the bidding document to form a bidding catalogue keyword list 2[ ' bidding letter ', ' technical parameter ' and ' achievement ], acquiring importance ranking of each document according to the experience of a bidding evaluation expert, and calculating a corresponding title preference weight list [0.3, 0.6 and 0.1] by utilizing an analytic hierarchy process;
C) extracting file names of the bid files to form a bid file name list 3[ "bid quotation file", "business bid partial file", "technical bid partial file" ];
D) extracting a file directory of the bid file to form a bid file directory list 4[ "I, a bid letter", "2.3 product technical parameters", "6.5 company same type product supply achievement ];
E) the first keyword "bid" of the bidding document name keyword list 1 and the bidding document name list 3[ "bid quotation file", "business bid section file", "technical bid section file"]In (1)Performing character matching on each file name to obtain a character string Matching the keyword of the 'quotation' is successful, and the preference weight of the corresponding file is 0.3;
F) listing the keywords of the bidding filenames in turn [ alpha ]1,α2,...,αm]Each keyword a ofiAnd a list of bid filenames [ a ]1,a2,...,am]Each file name inaiMatch is made ifThe file name keyword alpha isiCorresponding file preference weight kiOutputting;
G) and calculating the file name matching property of the bid file according to a file name matching calculation formula:
matching property of file name ∑ ki100%, the formula is the keyword α that matches all successfullyiCorresponding file preference weight kiAnd accumulating.
H) Will bid on the file directory keyword list [ beta ]1,β2,...,βn]Each keyword of (b)iAnd a list of bid filenames [ b ]1,b2,...,bn]Each file name b injMatch is made ifThen the directory key beta is usedjCorresponding title preference weight ljOutputting;
I) and calculating the file directory matching of the bid file according to a file directory matching calculation formula:
file directory matching ═ Σ lj100%, the formula is the keyword β that matches all successfullyjCorresponding title preference weight ljAnd accumulating.
J) And comparing the file name matching performance and the file directory matching performance with a preset threshold value, and outputting a matching performance checking result.
Step 4, establishing an authenticity verification model, recognizing and extracting key information of qualification and certificate pictures in the bidding document by using an OCR (optical character recognition), verifying authenticity, and confirming the qualification of bidding and the authenticity of the document:
the authenticity auditing model is used for recognizing and extracting key information of qualification and certificate pictures in the bidding document by using OCR (optical character recognition), and performing security validation to ensure the qualification of bidding and the authenticity of the document.
A) Scanning the bidding text by using an OCR optical character recognition technology, analyzing and processing the image file, acquiring information such as a qualification (certificate) name, a qualification (certificate) number, a qualification (certificate) holder name and the like in a qualification (certificate) picture in the bidding document, and storing the information as a qualification list;
B) uploading each item of information of the qualification list to a corresponding checking website, checking the authenticity, and outputting a checking result;
C) inputting the name and qualification list of the bidding enterprise into a qualification database of the bidding enterprise for filing;
D) when the bidding enterprises participate in bidding, the steps A) to C) can be carried out, and qualification supplement or new enterprise filing is carried out;
E) the minimum requirement qualification required by the current bidding project is a necessary element, when the enterprise qualification is higher than the qualification required by the bidding or the additional high-quality qualification is a preferred element, the enterprise qualification is compared with the qualification required by the bidding, the qualification grade of the bidding enterprise is output, when the bidding enterprise meets the minimum requirement qualification condition, the bidding enterprise is marked as qualified, and when the qualification of the bidding enterprise is higher than the qualification required by the bidding, the bidding enterprise is marked with qualification classification according to the preset high-quality qualification condition;
F) and obtaining qualification checking results and qualification grades of the bidding enterprises according to the steps A) to E).
Step 5, constructing and outputting qualification auditing results
A) Respectively comparing the validity audit result, the safety audit result, the matching audit result and the authenticity audit result of the bidding enterprise with corresponding preset thresholds or conditions;
B) the preset condition of validity audit is that 4 results of A), B), C) and D) in the step 1 all reach the standard, if all the results reach the standard, the validity audit is passed, if the results do not reach the standard, the validity audit is not passed, and the items which do not reach the standard are output;
C) the preset condition of the security audit is that 2 results in the step 2A) and the step B) all reach the standard, if all reach the standard, the security audit is passed, if the results do not reach the standard, the security audit is not passed, and the items which do not reach the standard are output;
D) the preset threshold value of the matching audit is that the file name matching is 100%, the file directory matching is 95%, if all the files meet the standard, the matching audit is passed, and if the files do not meet the standard, the matching audit is not passed;
E) the predetermined condition of the authenticity audit is described in step 5E);
F) judging qualification auditing results of the bidding enterprises according to the preset threshold values or condition output results of the B), C), D) and E), wherein the specific method is that if all four output results pass, the qualification auditing results of the bidding enterprises are output to pass, if the comparison result does not pass, the qualification auditing results of the bidding enterprises are output to leave doubt, and the leave doubt terms are output, so that automatic alarm can be set and sent, and manual secondary auditing can be submitted;
G) and calculating qualification audit results of all enterprises, if the number of the enterprises passing the qualification audit is more than or equal to 3, the item is effective in bidding and can be subjected to bid evaluation, otherwise, the bidding result is a bid flow and needs to be tendered again.
H) And outputting the results of F) and G).
In specific implementation, a person skilled in the art can implement the automatic operation process by using a computer software technology, and a system device for implementing the method, such as a computer-readable storage medium storing a corresponding computer program according to the technical solution of the present invention and a computer device including a corresponding computer program for operating the computer program, should also be within the scope of the present invention.
In some possible embodiments, an automatic qualification auditing system in electronic bidding is provided, which comprises a first module, a second module and a third module, wherein the first module is used for constructing a bidding validity auditing model, analyzing extracted bidding documents and data and obtaining the validity of the current bid of a bidding enterprise;
the second module is used for constructing a bidding security auditing model, identifying and uniquely authenticating relevant data of the bidding system and obtaining the security of the current bidding of the bidding document;
the third module is used for constructing a bidding matching auditing model, analyzing the catalog of the bidding document and obtaining the matching of the bidding request content and the bidding document content;
the fourth module is used for constructing a bidding authenticity auditing model, recognizing and extracting key information of qualification and certificate pictures in the bidding document by using an OCR (optical character recognition), verifying authenticity and confirming the bidding qualification and the authenticity of the document;
and a fifth module for outputting the result of checking the tendering qualification of the current bidding enterprise according to the analysis result of the step and sending an automatic alarm for the unqualified condition.
In some possible embodiments, an automatic qualification auditing system in electronic bidding is provided, including a processor and a memory, the memory storing program instructions, the processor being configured to invoke the stored instructions in the memory to perform an automatic qualification auditing method in electronic bidding as described above.
In some possible embodiments, there is provided an automatic qualification auditing system in electronic bidding, including a readable storage medium on which is stored a computer program, which when executed, implements an automatic qualification auditing method in electronic bidding as described above.
The specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the spirit of the invention. Various modifications or additions may be made to the described embodiments or alternatives may be employed by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit or ambit of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Claims (10)
1. An automatic qualification auditing method in electronic bidding is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step 1, establishing a bidding validity auditing model, and analyzing the extracted bidding document files and data to obtain the validity of the current bid of the bidding enterprise;
step 2, constructing a bidding security auditing model, and identifying and uniquely authenticating relevant data of the bidding system to obtain the security of the current bidding of the bidding document;
step 3, constructing a bidding matching auditing model, and analyzing the catalog of the bidding document to obtain the matching of the bidding request content and the contents of the bidding document;
step 4, establishing a bidding authenticity auditing model, recognizing and extracting key information of qualification and certificate pictures in the bidding document by using an OCR (optical character recognition), and verifying authenticity to confirm the bidding qualification and the authenticity of the document;
and 5, outputting the bidding qualification auditing result of the current bidding enterprise according to the analysis result of the step, and sending an automatic alarm to the unqualified condition.
2. The method for automatically auditing qualification in electronic bidding according to claim 1, wherein: the validity checking model in the step 1 is to automatically conduct qualification pre-checking, bidding document checking, valid time checking and enterprise credit checking on bidding enterprises so as to realize validity checking, and the implementation process in the step 1 comprises the following substeps,
A) compiling qualification prequalification, checking a qualification prequalification application letter submitted in a bidding system, a legal representative person identification, an authorization submission book, an applicant basic condition table, a recent financial condition table, a recent similar project condition table, a project condition table under construction and new acceptance, a recent litigation and arbitration condition material, confirming whether a prebidding enterprise has qualification, and marking a result;
B) the method comprises the following steps of bidding document examination, checking whether a bidding system receives a bidding function document and a guarantee fund document of a bidding enterprise, confirming whether the bidding enterprise uploads a necessary bidding document, and marking a result;
C) checking the effective time, checking the time of uploading the bidding documents and the time of mailing paper-edition bidding materials by enterprises in the bidding system, comparing the time with the preset bidding deadline time, confirming whether the bidding documents have effectiveness, and marking the result;
D) enterprise credit examination, inquiring the credit condition of the bidding enterprise through public information, checking whether the credit condition of the bidding enterprise accords with the requirements of bidding documents and national laws and regulations, and marking results;
E) and obtaining a bidding validity auditing result according to the marking results of the steps A), B), C) and D).
3. The method for automatically auditing qualification in electronic bidding according to claim 1, wherein: the safety auditing model in step 2 is used for automatically identifying the legality of the behavior of the tenderer in the bidding process, uniquely authenticating the tenderer before and after the tenderer's bidding document, ensuring the safety of the state of the bidding document in the bidding system, and avoiding the bidding document from being modified or maliciously tampered by halfway collusion, the implementation process in step 2 comprises the following substeps,
A) acquiring identity authentication information and authority information of a login person from a bidding system, comparing and confirming the information with system preset information, ensuring the safety and the legality of login behaviors, and marking results;
B) when a bidder uploads a bid file from a bidding system, the unique identification code of the bid file is obtained through an MD5 algorithm and is stored and encrypted along with the file, the unique identification code of the bid file is calculated through an MD5 algorithm again during bid opening, the unique identification codes of the file are compared, the unique identification codes of the file are completely consistent, the file which is bid by the bidder is completely consistent with a bid opening field file, serial modification and malicious tampering do not occur in the midway, the bid file is decrypted, and the comparison result of the identification codes of the file is marked;
C) and obtaining a bidding safety auditing result according to the marking results in the steps A) and B).
4. The method for automatically auditing qualification in an electronic bid according to claim 1, characterized by: the matching auditing model of step 3 is to calculate the matching of the bidding document name and the matching of the bidding document directory by character matching, the step 3 implementation process comprises the following substeps,
A) according to the requirements of the bidding documents, respectively extracting the keywords alpha in the bidding document names1,α2,...,αmForm a keyword list [ alpha ] of the file names to be bid on1,α2,...,αm]Where m is the number of keywords in the bid document name, αi≠αjWhen the key word label i is not equal to j and i, j belongs to {1,2, 3.. eta., m }, inputting the importance sequence of each file, and calculating a corresponding file preference weight list [ k ] by utilizing an analytic hierarchy process1,k2,...,km]Wherein k is1+k2+...+km=1;
B) According to the requirement of the bidding document, extracting keywords beta of each grade title in the contents of the bidding document1,β2,...,βnForm a keyword list [ beta ] of the bidding catalog1,β2,...,βn]Where n is the number of keywords in the bid catalog, βi≠βjWhen the key word label i is not equal to j and i, j belongs to {1,2, 3.. once, n }, inputting the importance sequence of each title, and calculating a corresponding title preference weight list [ l ] by utilizing an analytic hierarchy process1,l2,...,ln]Wherein l is1+l2+...+ln=1;
C) Extracting file names of the bidding files, setting M file names to form a bidding file name list [ a ]1,a2,...,aM]Extracting the file directory of the bid document, setting N file directories to form bid document directory list [ b1,b2,...,bN];
D) Will bid on the file name keyword list [ alpha ]1,α2,...,αm]Each keyword a ofiAnd a list of bid filenames [ a ]1,a2,...,aM]Each file name a inIPerforming character matching ifThe file name keyword alpha isiCorresponding file preference weight kiOutputting;
E) and calculating the file name matching property of the bid file according to the following file name matching calculation formula:
matching property of file name ∑ ki*100%
F) Will bid on the file directory keyword list [ beta ]1,β2,...,βn]Each keyword of (b)jAnd a list of bid filenames [ b ]1,b2,...,bN]Each file directory b inJMatch is made ifThen the directory key beta is usedjCorresponding title preference weight ljOutputting;
G) and calculating the file directory matching of the bid file according to the following file directory matching calculation formula:
file directory matching ═ Σ lj*100%
H) And respectively comparing the file name matching property and the file directory matching property with corresponding preset thresholds, and outputting a matching property checking result.
5. The method for automatically auditing qualification in electronic bidding according to claim 1, wherein: the authenticity verification model in step 4 is to utilize OCR to recognize and extract key information of qualification and certificate pictures in the bidding document, automatically perform security verification and ensure the authenticity of the bidding qualification and document, the implementation process in step 4 comprises the following substeps,
A) scanning the bidding text by utilizing OCR optical character recognition, analyzing and processing the image file, acquiring the qualification name, the qualification number and the name information of a qualification holder in a qualification picture in the bidding file, and storing the qualification name, the qualification number and the name information as a qualification list;
B) uploading each item of information of the qualification list to a corresponding checking website, checking the authenticity, and outputting a checking result;
C) inputting the name and qualification list of the bidding enterprise into a qualification database of the bidding enterprise for filing;
D) when the bidding enterprises participate in bidding, the steps A) to C) can be carried out, and qualification supplement or new enterprise filing is carried out;
E) the minimum requirement qualification required by the current bid inviting project is a necessary element, when the enterprise qualification is higher than the bid inviting requirement qualification or has additional high-quality qualification as a preferred element, the enterprise qualification is compared with the qualification required by the bid inviting, and the bid enterprise qualification grade is output;
F) and obtaining qualification checking results and qualification grades of the bidding enterprises according to the steps A) to E).
6. The method for automatically auditing qualification in electronic bidding according to claim 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 or 5, characterized in that: the step 5 implementation process includes the following sub-steps,
A) respectively comparing the validity audit result, the security audit result, the matching audit result and the authenticity audit result of the bidding enterprise with corresponding thresholds or conditions, and outputting the qualification audit result of the bidding enterprise;
B) and calculating qualification auditing results of all enterprises, wherein if the number of the enterprises passing the qualification auditing is more than or equal to a preset threshold value, the bidding of the item is effective and can be subjected to bid evaluation, otherwise, the bidding is ineffective and the bid is required to be re-tendered.
7. An automatic qualification auditing system in electronic bidding is characterized in that: method for automated qualification audit in electronic bidding implementing one of the claims 1-6.
8. An automated qualification audit system in electronic bidding according to claim 7, wherein: the bidding effectiveness auditing method comprises a first module and a second module, wherein the first module is used for constructing a bidding effectiveness auditing model, analyzing extracted bidding documents and data and obtaining the effectiveness of the current bidding of a bidding enterprise;
the second module is used for constructing a bidding security auditing model, identifying and uniquely authenticating relevant data of the bidding system and obtaining the security of the current bidding of the bidding document;
the third module is used for constructing a bidding matching auditing model, analyzing the catalog of the bidding document and obtaining the matching of the bidding request content and the bidding document content;
the fourth module is used for constructing a bidding authenticity auditing model, recognizing and extracting key information of qualification and certificate pictures in the bidding document by using an OCR (optical character recognition), verifying authenticity and confirming the bidding qualification and the authenticity of the document;
and a fifth module for outputting the result of checking the tendering qualification of the current bidding enterprise according to the analysis result of the step and sending an automatic alarm for the unqualified condition.
9. An automated qualification audit system in electronic bidding according to claim 7, wherein: comprising a processor and a memory for storing program instructions, the processor being adapted to invoke the stored instructions in the memory to perform a method of automated qualification in electronic bidding according to any one of claims 1-6.
10. An automated qualification audit system in electronic bidding according to claim 7, wherein: comprising a readable storage medium having stored thereon a computer program which, when executed, implements a method for automated qualification review in electronic bidding according to any one of claims 1-6.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202210015254.5A CN114462960A (en) | 2022-01-07 | 2022-01-07 | Automatic qualification auditing method and system in electronic bidding |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202210015254.5A CN114462960A (en) | 2022-01-07 | 2022-01-07 | Automatic qualification auditing method and system in electronic bidding |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN114462960A true CN114462960A (en) | 2022-05-10 |
Family
ID=81409871
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202210015254.5A Pending CN114462960A (en) | 2022-01-07 | 2022-01-07 | Automatic qualification auditing method and system in electronic bidding |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN114462960A (en) |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN116433052A (en) * | 2023-06-14 | 2023-07-14 | 鼎信数智技术集团股份有限公司 | Intelligent bidding information acquisition data analysis and evaluation system |
CN116757807A (en) * | 2023-08-14 | 2023-09-15 | 湖南华菱电子商务有限公司 | Intelligent auxiliary label evaluation method based on optical character recognition |
CN116823286A (en) * | 2023-06-08 | 2023-09-29 | 杭州图特信息科技有限公司 | Supplier qualification management method and system |
CN117093548A (en) * | 2023-10-20 | 2023-11-21 | 公诚管理咨询有限公司 | Bidding management auditing system |
CN117332041A (en) * | 2023-10-08 | 2024-01-02 | 浙江招天下招投标交易平台有限公司 | Electronic bidding purchasing method and system |
CN117541367A (en) * | 2024-01-08 | 2024-02-09 | 辽宁省网联数字科技产业有限公司 | Digital bidding document making and evaluating system based on artificial intelligence |
CN117689456A (en) * | 2023-11-28 | 2024-03-12 | 电能易购(北京)科技有限公司 | Electric power engineering bid information management method and system |
CN117726300A (en) * | 2023-12-22 | 2024-03-19 | 国网江苏省电力工程咨询有限公司 | Automatic intelligent processing system for verifying bidding agency business data |
-
2022
- 2022-01-07 CN CN202210015254.5A patent/CN114462960A/en active Pending
Cited By (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN116823286A (en) * | 2023-06-08 | 2023-09-29 | 杭州图特信息科技有限公司 | Supplier qualification management method and system |
CN116433052A (en) * | 2023-06-14 | 2023-07-14 | 鼎信数智技术集团股份有限公司 | Intelligent bidding information acquisition data analysis and evaluation system |
CN116433052B (en) * | 2023-06-14 | 2023-09-26 | 鼎信数智技术集团股份有限公司 | Intelligent bidding information acquisition data analysis and evaluation system |
CN116757807A (en) * | 2023-08-14 | 2023-09-15 | 湖南华菱电子商务有限公司 | Intelligent auxiliary label evaluation method based on optical character recognition |
CN116757807B (en) * | 2023-08-14 | 2023-11-14 | 湖南华菱电子商务有限公司 | Intelligent auxiliary label evaluation method based on optical character recognition |
CN117332041A (en) * | 2023-10-08 | 2024-01-02 | 浙江招天下招投标交易平台有限公司 | Electronic bidding purchasing method and system |
CN117093548A (en) * | 2023-10-20 | 2023-11-21 | 公诚管理咨询有限公司 | Bidding management auditing system |
CN117093548B (en) * | 2023-10-20 | 2024-01-26 | 公诚管理咨询有限公司 | Bidding management auditing system |
CN117689456A (en) * | 2023-11-28 | 2024-03-12 | 电能易购(北京)科技有限公司 | Electric power engineering bid information management method and system |
CN117689456B (en) * | 2023-11-28 | 2024-05-17 | 电能易购(北京)科技有限公司 | Electric power engineering bid information management method and system |
CN117726300A (en) * | 2023-12-22 | 2024-03-19 | 国网江苏省电力工程咨询有限公司 | Automatic intelligent processing system for verifying bidding agency business data |
CN117726300B (en) * | 2023-12-22 | 2024-05-24 | 国网江苏省电力工程咨询有限公司 | Automatic intelligent processing system for verifying bidding agency business data |
CN117541367A (en) * | 2024-01-08 | 2024-02-09 | 辽宁省网联数字科技产业有限公司 | Digital bidding document making and evaluating system based on artificial intelligence |
CN117541367B (en) * | 2024-01-08 | 2024-04-02 | 辽宁省网联数字科技产业有限公司 | Digital bidding document making and evaluating system based on artificial intelligence |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN114462960A (en) | Automatic qualification auditing method and system in electronic bidding | |
US11170376B2 (en) | Informational and analytical system and method for ensuring the level of trust, control and secure interaction of counterparties when using electronic currencies and contracts | |
CN108376317B (en) | Intellectual property policy risk prevention system, intellectual property transaction system based on same and intellectual property transaction method | |
KR101952498B1 (en) | Loan service providing method using black chain and system performing the same | |
US20230134651A1 (en) | Synchronized Identity, Document, and Transaction Management | |
CN111581653A (en) | Contract document signing method, device, equipment and computer readable storage medium | |
CN111966968A (en) | Copyright protection method and system based on block chain | |
CN117314424B (en) | Block chain transaction system and method for big financial data | |
US20150213460A1 (en) | Continuing-education certificate validation | |
EP3940611A1 (en) | Personal information management system, personal information management device, and personal information management method | |
CN114386935A (en) | Examination and verification method and device for bid document | |
US20230214502A1 (en) | Systems and methods for electronic document execution, authentication, and forensic review | |
CN115170257A (en) | Method, system and device for bid evaluation | |
CN113515781B (en) | Electronic insurance letter verification method and device | |
KR101876672B1 (en) | Digital signature method using block chain and system performing the same | |
CN116071148B (en) | Loan qualification auditing and managing system | |
CN115150150B (en) | Information recording method based on block chain technology | |
CN114240362B (en) | Case information processing method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
CN114386936A (en) | Storage method and device for bid document | |
KR102315328B1 (en) | A system and method for providing legal contract services to resolve disputes between parties by storing online conversations in a blockchain | |
CN115470177A (en) | File processing method, device, equipment and computer storage medium | |
CN114331105A (en) | Electronic draft processing system, method, electronic device and storage medium | |
CN111898146A (en) | Online notarization method, device and system based on block chain | |
CN117592125B (en) | Reliability electronic signature method of paperless transaction system for second-hand house transaction | |
KR102500127B1 (en) | System for automatically determining year and exact calculation and method performing the same |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |