CN114231445A - Mixed fermentation medium of composite probiotics and application thereof - Google Patents

Mixed fermentation medium of composite probiotics and application thereof Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN114231445A
CN114231445A CN202111448586.4A CN202111448586A CN114231445A CN 114231445 A CN114231445 A CN 114231445A CN 202111448586 A CN202111448586 A CN 202111448586A CN 114231445 A CN114231445 A CN 114231445A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
feed
mixed
fermentation
percent
probiotic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN202111448586.4A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN114231445B (en
Inventor
孙春利
朱玉鹏
孙立静
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Tangshan Qiankelai Biotechnology Co ltd
Original Assignee
Tangshan Qiankelai Biotechnology Co ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Tangshan Qiankelai Biotechnology Co ltd filed Critical Tangshan Qiankelai Biotechnology Co ltd
Priority to CN202111448586.4A priority Critical patent/CN114231445B/en
Publication of CN114231445A publication Critical patent/CN114231445A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN114231445B publication Critical patent/CN114231445B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N1/00Microorganisms, e.g. protozoa; Compositions thereof; Processes of propagating, maintaining or preserving microorganisms or compositions thereof; Processes of preparing or isolating a composition containing a microorganism; Culture media therefor
    • C12N1/20Bacteria; Culture media therefor
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23KFODDER
    • A23K10/00Animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K10/10Animal feeding-stuffs obtained by microbiological or biochemical processes
    • A23K10/12Animal feeding-stuffs obtained by microbiological or biochemical processes by fermentation of natural products, e.g. of vegetable material, animal waste material or biomass
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23KFODDER
    • A23K10/00Animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K10/10Animal feeding-stuffs obtained by microbiological or biochemical processes
    • A23K10/16Addition of microorganisms or extracts thereof, e.g. single-cell proteins, to feeding-stuff compositions
    • A23K10/18Addition of microorganisms or extracts thereof, e.g. single-cell proteins, to feeding-stuff compositions of live microorganisms
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N1/00Microorganisms, e.g. protozoa; Compositions thereof; Processes of propagating, maintaining or preserving microorganisms or compositions thereof; Processes of preparing or isolating a composition containing a microorganism; Culture media therefor
    • C12N1/14Fungi; Culture media therefor
    • C12N1/16Yeasts; Culture media therefor
    • C12N1/18Baker's yeast; Brewer's yeast

Abstract

The invention belongs to the field of probiotic fermentation, and discloses a mixed fermentation medium of composite probiotics and application thereof. The microbial composition for preparing the composite probiotic preparation consists of Saccharomyces cerevisiae J13, Enterococcus faecalis R12 and Bacillus subtilis Y11. The invention reduces the complicated process of preparing culture mediums with different formulas of various strains, obviously improves the viable count of each strain, reduces the production cost and has higher commercial value. The mixed probiotic bacteria agent is used for solid state fermentation of the feed, so that the contents of crude protein, small peptide and organic acid of the feed are obviously improved, the mouthfeel of the feed is improved, and the quality of the feed is improved.

Description

Mixed fermentation medium of composite probiotics and application thereof
Technical Field
The invention relates to the fields of industry, agriculture and food health, in particular to a mixed bacteria fermentation medium suitable for co-culture of composite probiotics and application thereof.
Background
Probiotics (Probiotics) is a kind of active microorganisms beneficial to a host, and is a general term for active beneficial microorganisms which are colonized in the intestinal tract and reproductive system of a human body or an animal and can generate definite health efficacy so as to improve the microbial ecological balance of the host and exert beneficial effects on the intestinal tract. The beneficial bacteria or fungi in human bodies and animal bodies are mainly as follows: probiotic bacillus, lactobacillus, bifidobacterium, lactobacillus acidophilus, actinomycetes, saccharomycetes and the like. The complex active probiotics composed of various microorganisms researched in the world at present are widely applied to the fields of bioengineering, industry and agriculture, food safety and life health. The mixed fermentation culture medium of the composite probiotics is developed by mainly using Bacillus subtilis, Enterococcus faecalis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae as starting strains.
Bacillus subtilis is a kind of Bacillus, without capsule, with periphytic flagellum and capable of movement. Gram-positive bacteria, can form endogenous spores. The propagation speed is high, the surfaces of colonies are rough and opaque, and the colonies are stained white or yellowish, and when the colonies grow in a liquid culture medium, folds are often formed, so that the colonies are aerobic bacteria. Can produce various hydrolases such as cellulase, protease, amylase, lipase, etc. Has important application in the fields of aquaculture, animal feed production, plant disease resistance, medicine and water purification.
Enterococcus faecalis (Enterococcus faecalis) is a facultative anaerobic type gram-positive lactic acid bacteria, the shape of the bacteria is spherical or chain-shaped, has no capsule, no spore, strong environmental adaptability and resistance, and can tolerate various antibiotics such as tetracycline, kanamycin, gentamicin and the like. Has important function in feed fermentation, can improve the micro-ecological balance in intestinal tract, inhibit pathogenic bacteria and remove anti-nutritional factors.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a yeast most closely related to human, and is used for making food, wine and fermented feed. The cells of the saccharomyces cerevisiae are spherical or oval, have the advantages of short growth cycle, strong fermentation capacity, easy large-scale culture, rich nutritional ingredients such as various proteins, amino acids, vitamins, bioactive substances and the like, and are widely applied in the fields of food, medicine and fermentation.
In recent two years, due to the proposal of an antibiotic-free breeding concept, the application of probiotics in animal production is also reported, and mainly comprises pigs, poultry, ruminants and the like. From research and development and use condition analysis at home and abroad, the utilization direction of probiotics tends to the application effect research of the composite probiotic preparation from the utilization of single strains. However, in the industrial culture process of the bacillus, the lactobacillus and the yeast, due to the special requirements on nutrition, the culture medium formulas of the bacillus, the lactobacillus and the yeast are different, so the common lactobacillus, the bacillus and the yeast are cultured separately, the fermentation process is improved, and the production cost is greatly increased. The antagonism may exist in the co-culture of different strains due to the special biological mechanism, for example, the antagonism exists in the co-culture of Lactobacillus casei (Lactobacillus casei), Lactobacillus plantarum (Lactobacillus csei), Lactobacillus acidophilus (Lactobacillus acidophilus) and other similar Lactobacillus strains. The symbiotic action between lactic acid bacteria and yeast is strong, and the lactic acid bacteria and the yeast can be usually cultured in a mixed way, but the bacillus and the yeast mutually generate antibacterial substances, so that the mixed fermentation is difficult to succeed. Therefore, it is very important to produce a cheap and economical mixed culture medium.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to solve the problem of mixed culture of probiotics, provides a culture medium and culture conditions suitable for mixed fermentation, and is used for solid state fermentation application of feed.
The purpose of the invention can be realized by the following technical scheme:
a microbial composition for preparing composite probiotic agent comprises Saccharomyces cerevisiae J13, Enterococcus faecalis R12 and Bacillus subtilis Y11; wherein, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) J13 is preserved in China center for type culture collection with the preservation date of 2021 year, 9 month and 6 days, and the preservation number of the strains is CCTCC NO: m20211145; enterococcus faecalis (Enterococcus faecalis) R12, which is preserved in China center for type culture Collection with a preservation date of 2021, 9 and 6 days, and the preservation number of the strain is CCTCC NO: m20211146; bacillus subtilis Y11 preserved in China center for type culture Collection with a preservation date of 2021, 9 months and 6 days, and the preservation number of the strains is CCTCC NO: m20211147.
The application of the microbial composition in preparing the composite probiotic agent.
The composite probiotic agent is applied to solid state fermentation of feed.
A mixed probiotic preparation is prepared by inoculating three microorganism seed liquids into a mixed culture medium YP, and performing mixed culture to a stationary phase to obtain the mixed probiotic preparation; the mixed bacteria culture medium YP is prepared by adding the following components in percentage by weight and volume in each 1000ml of water: 1 to 2 percent of molasses, 1.5 to 2 percent of peptone, 0.02 to 0.025 percent of magnesium sulfate heptahydrate, 0.1 to 0.5 percent of dipotassium phosphate, 0.1 to 0.6 percent of anhydrous sodium acetate, 0.005 to 0.01 percent of manganese sulfate monohydrate, and finally adjusting the pH value to 6.0 to 6.5.
Preferably, the mixed culture medium YP comprises 1000ml of water and the following components by weight and volume percent: 2% of molasses, 1.5% of peptone, 0.025% of magnesium sulfate heptahydrate, 0.2% of dipotassium phosphate, 0.6% of anhydrous sodium acetate and 0.005% of manganese sulfate monohydrate, and finally adjusting the pH value to 6.0-6.5.
As a preferable selection of the invention, the number of viable bacteria in the composite probiotic agent, namely the Bacillus subtilis Y11, the enterococcus faecalis R12 and the Saccharomyces cerevisiae J13, is more than 1 hundred million CFU/ml.
A preparation method of a mixed probiotic preparation comprises the steps of inoculating three microorganism seed solutions into a mixed culture medium YP, and carrying out mixed culture to a stationary phase to obtain the mixed probiotic preparation; the culture conditions are that the pH is 6.0-6.5, the optimum temperature is 35-37 ℃, and the optimum rotation speed is 180-220 r/min.
The composite probiotic agent disclosed by the invention is applied to solid state fermentation of feed.
The probiotic preparation is used for a feed solid-state fermentation method, the optimal inoculation amount of the composite probiotic preparation is 10%, the optimal fermentation temperature is 36 ℃, the optimal material-water ratio is 60% (weight of solid raw materials: volume of water added), and the fermentation time is 3 days.
The mixed probiotic agent disclosed by the invention is applied to improving the contents of crude protein, small peptide and organic acid in feed.
The mixed probiotic agent disclosed by the invention is applied to improving the mouthfeel of the feed and improving the quality of the feed.
Compared with the prior art, the method has the following advantages: the method is simple and feasible, is economical and practical, and solves the problem that the culture medium cannot be used universally due to special requirements of nutrition for Bacillus subtilis, Enterococcus faecalis (Enterococcus faecium) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Saccharomyces cerevisiae).
The composite probiotic preparation is used for solid state fermentation of the feed, so that the contents of crude protein, small peptide and organic acid in the feed are obviously improved, the mouthfeel of the feed is improved, and the quality of the feed is improved.
Biological material preservation information
Saccharomyces cerevisiae J13, which is preserved in China center for type culture Collection with the preservation date of 2021, 9 months and 6 days, and the preservation number of strains is CCTCC NO: m20211145, the preservation address is Wuhan university in Wuhan, China.
Enterococcus faecalis R12, which is preserved in China center for type culture Collection with the preservation date of 2021, 9 and 6 days, and the preservation number of strains is CCTCCNO: m20211146, the preservation address is Wuhan university in Wuhan, China.
Bacillus subtilis Y11, which is preserved in China center for type culture Collection with the preservation date of 2021, 9 months and 6 days, and the preservation number of strains is CCTCC NO: m20211147, the preservation address is Wuhan university in Wuhan, China.
Detailed Description
In order to make the experimental technique of the present invention more comprehensible, the experimental scheme is further illustrated below with reference to specific embodiments, and any modification within the scope of the claims is still within the scope of the claims.
Example 1 Mixed culture Medium Single factor optimization
The optimum carbon source and nitrogen source are respectively determined by single-factor experiment on the initial culture medium (LB, MRS and YPD) of Bacillus subtilis Y11, Enterococcus faecalis R12 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae J13 by taking the viable count as an index.
The three initial culture media are LB culture medium (10 g of peptone, 5g of yeast extract, 10g of sodium chloride, distilled water to a constant volume of 1000mL and pH 7.0), MRS culture medium (10 g of peptone, 10g of beef extract, 5g of yeast extract, 2g of diammonium citrate, 20g of glucose, 5g of sodium acetate, 2g of dipotassium hydrogen phosphate, 0.25g of magnesium sulfate, 0.05g of manganese sulfate, 3g of calcium chloride, pH 6.8 and 1000mL of water), YPD culture medium (20 g of glucose, 20g of peptone, 10g of yeast extract, 1000mL of distilled water and pH 6.2-6.5), modified MRS culture medium (10 g of peptone, 10g of beef extract, 5g of yeast extract, 20g of glucose, distilled water to a constant volume of 1000mL and pH 7.0), respectively.
Screening of carbon sources: inoculating seed liquid of three strains into improved MRS culture medium with carbon sources of lactose, molasses, cane sugar, glucose and soluble starch respectively according to 1 percent of inoculation amount (V: V), adjusting the initial pH of the culture medium to 7.0 by using dilute hydrochloric acid or 0.1 percent NaOH solution, carrying out shake culture at 30 ℃ and 180r/min for 24h, carrying out gradient dilution, and counting viable bacteria.
And (3) screening of nitrogen sources: after the optimal carbon source is determined, inoculating seed liquid of three strains into an improved MRS culture medium with a nitrogen source of tryptone, yeast extract, beef extract, urea, soybean peptone and yeast extract mixed (mixing ratio is 1: 1) according to 1 percent of inoculation amount (V: V), wherein the nitrogen source accounts for 2 percent (weight: volume), adjusting the initial pH of the culture medium to 7.0 by using dilute hydrochloric acid or 0.1 percent NaOH solution, carrying out shake culture for 24h under the conditions of 30 ℃ and 180r/min, carrying out gradient dilution, and counting viable bacteria.
As can be seen from Table 1, the carbon and nitrogen sources suitable for the three strains are molasses and peptone, respectively.
TABLE 1 viable cell count under different carbon and nitrogen sources
Figure BDA0003384724440000051
Enterococcus faecalis (Enterococcus faecalis) R12 primary Medium (MRS) has complex components, so that key components of the medium are determined by a Plackett-Burman test design, and the key components are sequentially peptone 1%, magnesium sulfate heptahydrate 0.025%, manganese sulfate monohydrate 0.005%, anhydrous sodium acetate 0.5% and beef extract 1% (weight: volume) according to the factor effect and significance ranking. The final inorganic salts were determined to be anhydrous sodium acetate, magnesium sulfate heptahydrate and manganese sulfate monohydrate.
TABLE 2Plackett-Burman test design of the Effect and significance of each factor
Figure BDA0003384724440000061
Thus, the mixed fermentation medium composition was determined: molasses, peptone, magnesium sulfate heptahydrate, dipotassium hydrogen phosphate, anhydrous sodium acetate, manganese sulfate monohydrate and water.
Example 2 Mixed bacteria culture Medium formulation optimization
According to the Design principle of a Design-Expert response surface center combined test, on the basis of the optimal carbon source, nitrogen source, inorganic salt and concentration range thereof screened in a single-factor test, the initial pH is fixed to be 7.0, the inoculation amount is 1%, the fermentation temperature is 30 ℃, the shaking table is cultured at the rotating speed of 180r/min to a stable period, the initial pH is fixed to be 7.0, the inoculation amount is 1%, the fermentation temperature is 30 ℃, the shaking table is cultured to be in a stable period, the initial pH is diluted in a gradient manner, the viable bacteria count is carried out, and the specific adding amounts of molasses (A, B, C is 1.5%, 1.75% and 2% in sequence according to the concentration gradient), peptone (A, B, C is 1.25%, 1.5% and 1.75% in sequence according to the concentration gradient), anhydrous sodium acetate (A, B, C is 5%, 6% and 7% in sequence according to the concentration gradient in sequence (weight: volume) are optimized by utilizing a response surface analysis method. As can be seen from Table 3, the optimal formulation of the mixed culture medium (YP) is as follows: molasses 1.5%, peptone 1.5%, magnesium sulfate heptahydrate 0.025%, dipotassium hydrogen phosphate 0.2%, anhydrous sodium acetate 0.6%, manganese sulfate monohydrate 0.005%, and water 1000 ml.
TABLE 3Box-Behnken test results
Figure BDA0003384724440000062
Figure BDA0003384724440000071
Example 3 Mixed culture Condition optimization
Based on the mixed bacteria culture medium in the embodiment 2, 6 temperatures of 26 ℃, 28 ℃, 31 ℃, 34 ℃, 37 ℃ and 40 ℃ are selected as fermentation temperatures, and the cell number of the mixed bacteria at different temperatures is measured; selecting 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5 and 8.0 as initial pH values, and measuring the cell number of mixed bacteria under different initial pH values; selecting 120r/min, 140r/min, 160r/min, 180r/min, 200r/min and 220r/min as the rotating speed of the shaking table, and measuring the cell number of the mixed bacteria after fermentation at different rotating speeds. Determining the optimum pH value to be 6.0-6.5, the optimum temperature to be 37 ℃ and the optimum rotation speed to be 200 r/min.
TABLE 3 viable count at different temperatures, initial pH and rotation speeds
Figure BDA0003384724440000072
Figure BDA0003384724440000081
Example 4 preparation of Complex probiotic
A culture medium was prepared according to the mixed culture medium (YP: molasses 1.5%, peptone 1.5%, magnesium sulfate heptahydrate 0.025%, dipotassium hydrogen phosphate 0.2%, sodium acetate anhydrous 0.6%, manganese sulfate monohydrate 0.005%, water 1000ml) obtained in example 2. Purifying the obtained productBacillus subtilis Y11, Enterococcus faecalis R12 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae J13 seed solutions were cultured at night, inoculated into mixed culture medium YP (100mL Erlenmeyer flask) according to 1% inoculation amount (V: V), cultured according to the culture conditions (pH 6.0-6.5, 37 deg.C, 200R/min) obtained in example 3, sampled at intervals of 2h, and OD was measured at the beginning of bacterial solution and during culture600The value is obtained. The control treatments were initial media LB, MRS and YPD corresponding to the inoculated strains Y11, R12 and J13, respectively, with an inoculum size of 1% (V: V), and the culture conditions and assay methods were consistent with those of the mixed culture.
The results show that the growth rate of Enterococcus faecalis R12 is slightly higher than that of Bacillus subtilis Y11 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae J13 when the three strains enter the logarithmic growth phase at 2h, the Bacillus subtilis Y11 and Enterobacter faecalis R12 enter the stationary phase at 20h, and the Saccharomyces cerevisiae J13 still continues to grow and starts to enter the stationary phase at 36 h. As is clear from Table 4, the viable cell counts of the three strains were significantly higher than those of the initial medium at 36 hours in the mixed culture medium (YP).
TABLE 4 viable cell count of YP and initial medium for each strain
Figure BDA0003384724440000091
And the number of viable bacteria in the mixed bacteria fermentation liquor of 36h is determined by referring to a GB4789.2-2016 method. Bacillus subtilis Y11 from 3.52X 10 of the starting Medium8CFU/ml lift of 1.02X 109CFU/ml, improved by 2.89 times; enterococcus faecalis R12 was cultured from 2.31X 10 of the original medium9CFU/ml lift of 4.97X 1010CFU/ml, improved by 110 times; saccharomyces cerevisiae J13 was cultured from 6.40X 10 of the starting medium7CFU/ml lift of 1.11X 1010CFU/ml is increased by 170 times, and the viable count is obviously increased.
Converting the cost of the YP culture medium according to the conversion of an industrial grade: 3.5 yuan/kg of molasses, 40 yuan/kg of peptone, 10 yuan/kg of magnesium sulfate heptahydrate, 4.36 monobasic potassium phosphate anhydrous sodium acetate, 3.32 yuan/kg of manganese sulfate monohydrate and 6 yuan/kg of monobasic potassium phosphate. The cost of preparing 1 ton of YP medium was 688.9 Yuan. Therefore, the culture medium (YP) is low in price, simple and feasible, is suitable for industrial production of Bacillus subtilis, Enterococcus faecalis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and has high commercial value.
Example 5 Condition determination of Complex probiotic fermented feed
Taking a Dilan brand one-way breather valve feed bag as a container, taking corn germ meal as a fermentation raw material, selecting 6 temperatures of 30 ℃, 32 ℃, 34 ℃, 36 ℃, 38 ℃ and 40 ℃ as fermentation temperatures, and measuring the content of small peptides after solid feed fermentation at different temperatures; selecting 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80% and 90% as material-water ratio (weight of solid raw material: water volume), and measuring small peptide content of solid feed after fermentation under different material-water ratios; 2.5%, 5%, 7.5%, 10%, 12.5% and 15% were selected as inoculum sizes (volume: weight), and the small peptide content in the fermented feed was determined at different inoculum sizes. From table 5, the optimal fermentation temperature is 36 ℃, the optimal feed-water ratio is 60%, and the optimal inoculation amount of the composite probiotic is 10%.
TABLE 5 optimization of the inoculum size, temperature and feed-water ratio for solid state fermentation of feed
Figure BDA0003384724440000101
Example 6 determination of crude protein, Dry materials and Total acid content of composite probiotic fermented feed
The method for measuring the crude protein in the feed adopts GB/T6432-1994 Kjeldahl nitrogen determination method. CK is empty fermentation (treatment with the same water content without inoculation of microbial inoculum). The results in Table 6 show that compared with the control, the crude protein content of the corn germ meal treated by the composite probiotic is obviously increased by 14.0 percent (P is less than 0.05)
The determination of the dry matter in the feed is slightly modified by adopting the determination method of the water in the GB/T6435-2014 feed. The results in Table 6 show that the dry matter content of the corn germ meal treated by the composite probiotic is increased by 2.73 percent compared with the control
The determination of the total acid in the feed is improved on the basis of GB/T12456-2008, and the total acid in the feed is determined by adopting an indicator method of acid-base titration. The results in Table 6 show that compared with the control, the total acid content of the corn germ meal treated by the composite probiotic is remarkably increased by 73.4% (P is less than 0.05)
TABLE 6 influence of Complex probiotics on the amount of crude protein, dry matter and total acid in the feed
Figure BDA0003384724440000102
Figure BDA0003384724440000111
Example 7 small peptide and dry matter recovery assay for complex probiotic fermented feed
The content of small peptide is an important index for measuring the effect of probiotic fermented feed, and the microbial fermentation can decompose macromolecular protein into small molecular protein which is beneficial to the absorption of animals, namely the small peptide and free amino acid, so that the small peptide is an important index for evaluating the microbial fermentation. The composite probiotic fermentation broth of example 4 was inoculated into corn germ meal at an inoculum size of 10% (volume: weight), adjusted to a moisture content of 50%, and left to ferment at 35 ℃ for 72 hours. The method of GB/T6432-1994 is improved, trichloroacetic acid is used as a protein precipitator to precipitate macromolecular proteins and long-chain peptides in the fermentation process, short-chain peptides and free amino acids are precipitated, and the protein content is determined by filtration, centrifugation, digestion and distillation. The results in table 7 show that compared with the control, the content of the corn germ meal small peptide of the composite probiotic is remarkably increased by 49% (P is less than 0.05), and the composite probiotic produces protease well.
The dry matter recovery rate is an important index for evaluating the feed nutrient loss condition, and generally, the higher the dry matter recovery rate, the less the feed nutrient loss. The composite probiotic fermentation broth in example 4 was inoculated into corn germ meal at an inoculum size of 10%, adjusted to a water content of 50%, and allowed to stand at 35 ℃ for fermentation for 72 hours. Dry matter recovery/%, i.e. feed dry matter after fermentation/feed dry matter before fermentation × 100. Compared with a control group, the dry matter recovery rate is improved by 6.52 percent, the dry matter recovery rate of the composite microbial inoculum treatment group is more than 98 percent, the nutrition loss is less, and the standard of the feed industry is met (the dry matter recovery rate is 90 to 100 percent).
Table 7 effect of complex probiotics on feed small peptide content
Figure BDA0003384724440000112
Example 8 determination of microbial content of Complex probiotic fermented corn germ meal
The microbial content is determined by referring to the GB/T13093-91 method, 10g of fermented feed is accurately weighed and placed in a triangular flask, 90mL of sterile water is poured, the triangular flask is placed in a constant temperature shaking table at 35 ℃ for 180r/min, after 30min of shaking, the fermented feed is diluted to proper mass concentration, 100 mu l of supernatant is respectively sucked and placed in sterilized MRS, LB and wort agar culture media to be coated and uniformly mixed. After culturing in a 37 ℃ incubator for 24 hours, the colonies were counted. As shown in Table 8, the number of viable bacteria of three strains reaches 1 hundred million CFU/ml by colony counting, wherein the viable bacteria of Bacillus subtilis Y11 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae J13 are respectively 8.16 multiplied by 1010CFU/ml and 2.86X 1010CFU/ml, the viable count of enterococcus faecalis is 2.77X 109CFU/ml. The composite flora can keep good growth in the feed.
TABLE 8 determination of the microbial content in the feed
Figure BDA0003384724440000121
Example 9 fermented feed sensory evaluation
The sensory evaluation result of the feed directly influences the fermentation effect of the feed. Sensory evaluation of the test was performed by 7 individuals in cooperation to ensure the accuracy of the test results. The fermentation sensory evaluation refers to DLG sensory evaluation standard, CK is used as a raw material, the processing group A is empty fermentation without inoculation, and the processing group B is fermentation processed by inoculation. The results are shown in table 9 with different sensory evaluations between treatments. The unfermented feed has general texture, light yellow color and no sour taste, and the fermented feed has good texture, golden yellow color, sour taste and wine flavor. From the sensory evaluation result, the best comprehensive score of the fermentation quality of the inoculation agent treatment is 17.85 points, the texture is good, the color is golden yellow, and the strong sour taste is achieved. After fermentation, the expansion of the feed bag is observed by naked eyes, and a large amount of gas is generated, wherein the gas is generated in the process of the anaerobic fermentation of the composite probiotic solid.
TABLE 9 sensory evaluation of the feeds
Figure BDA0003384724440000122

Claims (10)

1. A microbial composition for preparing a composite probiotic preparation, characterized by consisting of Saccharomyces cerevisiae J13, Enterococcus faecalis R12 and Bacillus subtilis Y11; wherein, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae J13 is preserved in China center for type culture collection with the preservation date of 2021, 9 and 6 days, and the preservation number of the strain is CCTCC M20211145; enterococcus faecalis (Enterococcus faecalis) R12 is preserved in China center for type culture Collection with a preservation date of 2021, 9 months and 6 days, and the strain preservation number is CCTCC M20211146; bacillus subtilis Y11 is preserved in China center for type culture Collection with a preservation date of 2021 year, 9 months and 6 days, and the strain preservation number is CCTCC M20211147.
2. Use of the microbial composition of claim 1 in solid state fermentation of feed.
3. Use of the microbial composition of claim 1 in the preparation of a mixed probiotic preparation.
4. A mixed probiotic preparation, characterized in that the three microorganism seed liquids of claim 1 are inoculated into a mixed culture medium YP and cultured to a stationary phase to obtain the mixed probiotic preparation; the mixed bacteria culture medium YP is prepared by adding the following components in percentage by weight and volume in each 1000ml of water: 1 to 2 percent of molasses, 1.5 to 2 percent of peptone, 0.02 to 0.025 percent of magnesium sulfate heptahydrate, 0.1 to 0.5 percent of dipotassium phosphate, 0.1 to 0.6 percent of anhydrous sodium acetate, 0.005 to 0.01 percent of manganese sulfate monohydrate, and finally adjusting the pH value to 6.0 to 6.5.
5. The mixed probiotic preparation according to claim 4, wherein the viable count of Bacillus subtilis Y11, enterococcus faecalis R12 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae J13 in the mixed probiotic preparation is more than 1 hundred million CFU/ml.
6. The method for preparing a mixed probiotic preparation according to any one of claims 4 to 5, wherein the three microorganism seed solutions according to claim 1 are inoculated into a mixed culture medium YP and cultured to a stationary phase to obtain the mixed probiotic preparation; the culture conditions are that the pH is 6.0-6.5, the optimum temperature is 35-37 ℃, and the optimum rotation speed is 180-220 r/min.
7. The use of the complex probiotic bacterial agent of claim 4 in solid state fermentation of feed.
8. The method for solid state fermentation of feed by using the probiotic preparation of claim 4, wherein the optimum inoculation amount of the composite probiotic preparation is 10%, the optimum fermentation temperature is 36 ℃, the optimum feed-water ratio is 60%, and the fermentation time is 3 days.
9. The use of the mixed probiotic bacterial agent of claim 4 for increasing the content of feed crude protein, small peptide and organic acid.
10. The use of the mixed probiotic bacterial agent of claim 4 for improving the mouthfeel and quality of feed.
CN202111448586.4A 2021-11-30 2021-11-30 Mixed fermentation medium of composite probiotics and application thereof Active CN114231445B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202111448586.4A CN114231445B (en) 2021-11-30 2021-11-30 Mixed fermentation medium of composite probiotics and application thereof

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202111448586.4A CN114231445B (en) 2021-11-30 2021-11-30 Mixed fermentation medium of composite probiotics and application thereof

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN114231445A true CN114231445A (en) 2022-03-25
CN114231445B CN114231445B (en) 2024-03-26

Family

ID=80752401

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202111448586.4A Active CN114231445B (en) 2021-11-30 2021-11-30 Mixed fermentation medium of composite probiotics and application thereof

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN114231445B (en)

Citations (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103098986A (en) * 2013-01-30 2013-05-15 广西富来康饲料有限公司 Beneficial microorganism antibiont-free feed and preparation method thereof
CN103468604A (en) * 2013-07-31 2013-12-25 浙江科峰生物技术有限公司 Bacillus subtilis and application thereof
CN103875893A (en) * 2014-03-28 2014-06-25 东莞市天盛生物科技有限公司 Multi-strain composite microorganism feed additive and preparation method thereof
CN104211505A (en) * 2014-08-27 2014-12-17 武汉瑞泽园生物环保科技有限公司 Bio-organic fertilizer and preparation method thereof
CN104293697A (en) * 2014-09-16 2015-01-21 李雪平 Chicken feed probiotic agent containing enterococcus faecalis and preparation method of chicken feed probiotic agent
CN105746850A (en) * 2014-12-16 2016-07-13 北京大北农科技集团股份有限公司 Low-temperature fermentation feed raw material and application of same in preparation of mixed feed for pig
CN105985916A (en) * 2015-01-28 2016-10-05 河南惠通天下动物药业有限公司 Composite microorganism preparation and preparation method thereof
CN106260547A (en) * 2016-08-05 2017-01-04 湖北凌卓生物工程有限公司 A kind of fermenting organism feedstuff and preparation method thereof
CN106551132A (en) * 2015-09-25 2017-04-05 泷全(漳州)生物科技有限公司 A kind of fermentative feedstuff of microbe preparation method that can improve pork quality
CN106721009A (en) * 2016-12-23 2017-05-31 山西大禹生物工程股份有限公司 Growth promotion puies forward quality feed addictive and preparation method
CN106834163A (en) * 2016-12-20 2017-06-13 湖南赛福资源饲料科技有限公司 Feed fermentation agent, fermented feed and preparation method thereof
CN106962609A (en) * 2017-04-01 2017-07-21 福建龙岩闽雄生物科技股份有限公司 A kind of direct putting type biological fermentation feed additive and its production and use
CN108740424A (en) * 2018-06-06 2018-11-06 唐山仟客莱生物科技有限公司 A kind of feed improving arginine, immunoglobulin content in sow breast milk
CN109221623A (en) * 2018-12-03 2019-01-18 河南工业大学 A kind of preparation method and application of feed additive
CN110012963A (en) * 2019-04-28 2019-07-16 张建军 The method that low moisture fermentation prepares complete feed
CN113215019A (en) * 2021-02-04 2021-08-06 郑州大学 Enterococcus faecalis and application thereof
CN113243450A (en) * 2021-01-29 2021-08-13 上海源耀农牧科技有限公司 Method for improving quality of mushroom bran feed through multi-strain mixed fermentation
US20220117264A1 (en) * 2019-01-10 2022-04-21 Evonik Operations Gmbh Fermentation broths and their use

Patent Citations (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103098986A (en) * 2013-01-30 2013-05-15 广西富来康饲料有限公司 Beneficial microorganism antibiont-free feed and preparation method thereof
CN103468604A (en) * 2013-07-31 2013-12-25 浙江科峰生物技术有限公司 Bacillus subtilis and application thereof
CN103875893A (en) * 2014-03-28 2014-06-25 东莞市天盛生物科技有限公司 Multi-strain composite microorganism feed additive and preparation method thereof
CN104211505A (en) * 2014-08-27 2014-12-17 武汉瑞泽园生物环保科技有限公司 Bio-organic fertilizer and preparation method thereof
CN104293697A (en) * 2014-09-16 2015-01-21 李雪平 Chicken feed probiotic agent containing enterococcus faecalis and preparation method of chicken feed probiotic agent
CN105746850A (en) * 2014-12-16 2016-07-13 北京大北农科技集团股份有限公司 Low-temperature fermentation feed raw material and application of same in preparation of mixed feed for pig
CN105985916A (en) * 2015-01-28 2016-10-05 河南惠通天下动物药业有限公司 Composite microorganism preparation and preparation method thereof
CN106551132A (en) * 2015-09-25 2017-04-05 泷全(漳州)生物科技有限公司 A kind of fermentative feedstuff of microbe preparation method that can improve pork quality
CN106260547A (en) * 2016-08-05 2017-01-04 湖北凌卓生物工程有限公司 A kind of fermenting organism feedstuff and preparation method thereof
CN106834163A (en) * 2016-12-20 2017-06-13 湖南赛福资源饲料科技有限公司 Feed fermentation agent, fermented feed and preparation method thereof
CN106721009A (en) * 2016-12-23 2017-05-31 山西大禹生物工程股份有限公司 Growth promotion puies forward quality feed addictive and preparation method
CN106962609A (en) * 2017-04-01 2017-07-21 福建龙岩闽雄生物科技股份有限公司 A kind of direct putting type biological fermentation feed additive and its production and use
CN108740424A (en) * 2018-06-06 2018-11-06 唐山仟客莱生物科技有限公司 A kind of feed improving arginine, immunoglobulin content in sow breast milk
CN109221623A (en) * 2018-12-03 2019-01-18 河南工业大学 A kind of preparation method and application of feed additive
US20220117264A1 (en) * 2019-01-10 2022-04-21 Evonik Operations Gmbh Fermentation broths and their use
CN110012963A (en) * 2019-04-28 2019-07-16 张建军 The method that low moisture fermentation prepares complete feed
CN113243450A (en) * 2021-01-29 2021-08-13 上海源耀农牧科技有限公司 Method for improving quality of mushroom bran feed through multi-strain mixed fermentation
CN113215019A (en) * 2021-02-04 2021-08-06 郑州大学 Enterococcus faecalis and application thereof

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
关颖;吴泳标;林奕云;张国霞;张胜卿;: "一种基于多种微生物的急性毒性测定方法", 生态科学, no. 06, pages 6 - 13 *
徐晶;陈光;刘国明;张晓琳;赵明久;李爱科;: "不同菌株固态生料发酵棉籽粕的研究", 中国油脂, no. 07, pages 16 - 19 *
李永凯;毛胜勇;朱伟云;: "益生菌发酵饲料研究及应用现状", 畜牧与兽医, no. 03, pages 90 - 93 *
申远航;黄晓灵;吕航;陈萍;王众;郑宁;郑业鲁;: "发酵饲料生产工艺及其在猪生产上的应用", 广东农业科学, no. 11, pages 124 - 131 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN114231445B (en) 2024-03-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN112574922B (en) Bacillus belgii with probiotic effect and application thereof
CN101338283B (en) Lactobacillus casei and applications thereof in solid-state fermentation
CN103798503B (en) The ruminant Tiny ecosystem functional feed of composite zymocyte liquid and preparation method
CN104371960B (en) Composite fungus agent and the continuous fermentation method of complex microorganism adopted
CN108208335A (en) A kind of technique for improving cotton dregs Forage Nutritive Value using microbe fermentation method
CN113736716B (en) Lactobacillus paracasei, compound biological leavening agent for yellow storage and yellow storage method
CN113444664B (en) Lactobacillus brevis for producing gamma-aminobutyric acid and application thereof
CN103468594A (en) Candidautilis strain and application thereof
CN113604404A (en) Bacillus coagulans YSF17 and application thereof
CN112980740B (en) Bacillus licheniformis and application thereof
CN107691849B (en) Feed prepared by microbial fermentation
CN114304379A (en) Preparation method of fermented feed containing compound microbial agent
CN106497842A (en) The preparation method and application of a kind of lactic acid bacteria and aspergillus niger mixed solid fermentation preparation
CN108546663A (en) One boar source book song lactobacillus and its application
CN104894026B (en) The cultural method of bafillus natto and its application
CN102669432B (en) Compound probiotics preparation for geese and method for preparing same
CN102286411B (en) Lactobacillus plantarum and application thereof in fermenting cabbage wrapper leaf
CN109423466B (en) Compound fermentation inoculant and application thereof
CN114231445B (en) Mixed fermentation medium of composite probiotics and application thereof
CN115181707A (en) Bacillus subtilis and liquid-solid two-phase fermentation method thereof
CN102382779B (en) Manufacture method for set type additive-free yogurt and lactobacillus casei used therein
CN115927032A (en) Bacillus subtilis, leaven, preparation method and application thereof
CN103865832A (en) Lactobacillus plantarum BS10 and application thereof in regulating pig blood fat
CN108239616A (en) One Enterococcus faecalis bacterial strain and its application in wintercherry Tofu processing
CN109423467A (en) A kind of lactobacillus plantarum of lactic acid high yield and its purposes in food and field of fodder

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant