CN113933707B - Self-adjusting method for judging reliability of fault cause of generator set - Google Patents
Self-adjusting method for judging reliability of fault cause of generator set Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN113933707B CN113933707B CN202111186278.9A CN202111186278A CN113933707B CN 113933707 B CN113933707 B CN 113933707B CN 202111186278 A CN202111186278 A CN 202111186278A CN 113933707 B CN113933707 B CN 113933707B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- cause
- fault
- reliability
- criterion
- generator set
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R31/00—Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
- G01R31/34—Testing dynamo-electric machines
- G01R31/343—Testing dynamo-electric machines in operation
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Testing Electric Properties And Detecting Electric Faults (AREA)
- Control Of Eletrric Generators (AREA)
Abstract
The application discloses a self-adjusting method for judging reliability of a fault cause of a generator set, and belongs to the field of intelligent operation and maintenance of generator sets. According to the online monitoring point data in the fault diagnosis process of the generator set, the fault cause criterion result in the fault diagnosis system is determined, and the reliability of fault cause judgment is automatically corrected and updated in real time through a self-adjusting algorithm. The application has the advantages of clear principle, simple structure, accurate calculation and high operation efficiency, can continuously self-regulate the reliability of each fault cause judgment according to the operation monitoring data of the generator, ensures that the reliability is consistent with the unit degradation degree, improves the accuracy of the fault diagnosis cause probability, and provides scientific and effective technical support for realizing the automation and the intellectualization of the fault diagnosis of the generator unit.
Description
Technical Field
The application relates to the field of intelligent operation and maintenance of generator sets, in particular to a self-adjusting method for judging reliability of fault reasons of generator sets.
Background
Fault diagnosis and cause judgment are important components in the field of intelligent operation and maintenance of generator sets. Accurate fault diagnosis and reason judgment can ensure that the reason of the fault is rapidly positioned when the generator set has problems, and corresponding treatment measures and schemes are formulated to provide powerful support for intelligent overhaul decisions of the generator set.
In the judgment of the cause of the failure of the generator set, the reliability of the judgment result is an important index for determining the correctness of the reasoning result. In the conventional fault cause diagnosis method, the reliability of the decision structure is usually a fixed value, which is determined according to expert experience, and is not changed by a random set of operation parameters. The method can obtain the probability of the failure cause of the unit, but can not establish direct connection with the running state of the unit, so that the reasoning result and the actual working condition have larger difference.
In view of this, there is a need to develop a self-adjusting method for determining the reliability of the failure cause of the generator set. The method needs to consider the influence of the measurement point data on the fault cause judgment reliability when the unit operates, the more normal the measurement point data is, the smaller the fault cause judgment reliability is, the more abnormal the measurement point data is, the greater the fault cause judgment reliability is, the strong correlation between the unit operating condition and the fault cause judgment reliability is achieved, the fault cause judgment reliability is automatically adjusted and updated in real time along with the measurement point data, and the condition that the generator unit fault diagnosis cause judgment result is consistent with the unit operating state is ensured.
Disclosure of Invention
The application aims to provide a self-adjusting method for judging reliability of fault reasons of a generator set, and the technical scheme of the application comprises the following steps:
step one: according to the design and operation principle of the generator set, a judging method of each fault cause of the generator set is established, and k fault cause criteria are determined for one fault cause A, namely c respectively 1 、c 2 、…、c k For 1.ltoreq.i.ltoreq.k, when all k cause criteria c i If they are true, the failure cause A is true, and if any one of the cause criteria c i If the fault is false, the fault reason A is false;
step two: for each failure cause criterion c i The unified logic determination modes of (a) are L i1 ≤T i ≤L i2 Wherein T is i Criterion c for indicating failure cause i Corresponding measurement point data of L i1 Representing measurement point data T i Lower limit of L i2 Representing measurement point data T i When all k cause criteria c i When all are true, the cause criterion c i And corresponding judgmentAccording to the value L i Performing linear normalization processing to obtain a criterion value L i Expressed as:
step three: setting the reliability lower limit of failure cause A judgment as R 1 The upper limit of reliability of the failure cause A judgment is R 2 According to each fault cause criterion c in the second step i Criterion value L of (2) i The reliability R when the failure cause a is judged to be true is obtained as:
step four: and repeating the first step, the second step and the third step to obtain the credibility of each fault reason when the fault reason is judged to be true, and further comprehensively obtaining the occurrence probability of each fault reason.
In the self-adjusting method of the reliability of the failure cause judgment of the generator set, in the second step, each failure cause criterion c i With and only one corresponding site data T i 。
In the self-adjusting method of the reliability of the failure cause judgment of the generator set, in the second step, the cause criterion c i Corresponding criterion value L i Satisfy 0<L i ≤1。
In the above self-adjustment method for determining reliability of failure cause of generator set, in the third step, the reliability R when the failure cause a is determined to be true satisfies R 1 <R≤R 2 。
The beneficial effects of the application are as follows:
the self-adjusting method for judging the reliability of the fault cause of the generator set provided by the application has the following technical effects that:
1. the reliability of fault cause judgment is adapted to the state of the unit. In the fault cause judgment reliability determination process, the influence of the unit state monitoring data on the reliability is considered, and the reliability change trend is adapted to the unit state.
2. And adjusting the fault cause judgment reliability result in real time. And the unit state monitoring data is refreshed in real time, so that the automatic adjustment and the real-time updating of the reliability of fault cause judgment are realized, and the fault diagnosis result is ensured to meet the requirement of the dynamic change of the unit.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a self-adjusting method of judging reliability of a fault cause of a generator set.
Detailed Description
The application is further described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. The following examples are only for more clearly illustrating the technical aspects of the present application, and are not intended to limit the scope of the present application.
A self-adjusting method for judging reliability of fault reasons of a generator set comprises the following steps:
step one: according to the design and operation principle of the generator set, a judging method of each fault cause of the generator set is established, and k fault cause criteria are determined for one fault cause A, namely c respectively 1 、c 2 、…、c k For 1.ltoreq.i.ltoreq.k, when all k cause criteria c i If they are true, the failure cause A is true, and if any one of the cause criteria c i If the fault is false, the fault reason A is false; in this step c i If false, c can be determined as a criterion i Conversion into self complement as a cause criterion to ensure all c i The true time fault reason A is true.
Step two: for each failure cause criterion c i The unified logic determination modes of (a) are L i1 ≤T i ≤L i2 Wherein T is i Criterion c for indicating failure cause i Corresponding measurement point data of L i1 Representing measurement point data T i Lower limit of L i2 Representing measurement point data T i When all k cause criteria c i When all are true, the cause criterion c i And corresponding criterion value L i Performing linear normalization processing to obtain a criterion value L i Expressed as:
each fault cause criterion c in this step i With and only one corresponding site data T i Cause criterion c i Corresponding criterion value L i Satisfy 0<L i Is less than or equal to 1; the purpose of this step is to establish a criterion value L i And measurement point data T i The relation between the data T of the measuring points i The larger the value, the higher the degree of deterioration, the criterion value L i The larger.
Step three: setting the reliability lower limit of failure cause A judgment as R 1 The upper limit of reliability of the failure cause A judgment is R 2 According to each fault cause criterion c in the second step i Criterion value L of (2) i The reliability R when the failure cause a is judged to be true is obtained as:
the reliability R of the failure cause A in this step when it is judged to be true satisfies R 1 <R≤R 2 The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the The purpose of this step is to adjust the reliability R using all the criterion values determined by the failure cause a, the larger each criterion value is, the larger the adjusted reliability R is, and the higher the occurrence probability of the failure cause a is.
Step four: and repeating the first step, the second step and the third step to obtain the credibility of each fault reason when the fault reason is judged to be true, and further comprehensively obtaining the occurrence probability of each fault reason. The method aims to realize self-adjustment of the reliability of the fault cause judgment of the generator set at each moment, ensure the dynamic change of the reliability of the fault cause judgment and be consistent with the running condition of the generator set.
The present application is merely illustrative of the present application and not limited to the scope thereof, and those skilled in the art can make modifications thereto without departing from the spirit of the application.
Claims (4)
1. A self-adjusting method for judging reliability of fault reasons of a generator set is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step one: according to the design and operation principle of the generator set, a judging method of each fault cause of the generator set is established, and k fault cause criteria are determined for one fault cause A, namely c respectively 1 、c 2 、…、c k For 1.ltoreq.i.ltoreq.k, when all k cause criteria c i If they are true, the failure cause A is true, and if any one of the cause criteria c i If the fault is false, the fault reason A is false;
step two: for each failure cause criterion c i The unified logic determination modes of (a) are L i1 ≤T i ≤L i2 Wherein T is i Criterion c for indicating failure cause i Corresponding measurement point data of L i1 Representing measurement point data T i Lower limit of L i2 Representing measurement point data T i When all k cause criteria c i When all are true, the cause criterion c i And corresponding criterion value L i Performing linear normalization processing to obtain a criterion value L i Expressed as:
step three: setting the reliability lower limit of failure cause A judgment as R 1 The upper limit of reliability of the failure cause A judgment is R 2 According to each fault cause criterion c in the second step i Criterion value L of (2) i The reliability R when the failure cause a is judged to be true is obtained as:
step four: and repeating the first step, the second step and the third step to obtain the credibility of each fault reason when the fault reason is judged to be true, and further comprehensively obtaining the occurrence probability of each fault reason.
2. The self-adjusting method of the reliability of the failure cause judgment of the generator set according to claim 1, characterized by comprising the steps of: in the second step, each failure cause criterion c i With and only one corresponding site data T i 。
3. The self-adjusting method of the reliability of the failure cause judgment of the generator set according to claim 1, characterized by comprising the steps of: in the second step, the reason criterion c i Corresponding criterion value L i Satisfy 0<L i ≤1。
4. The self-adjusting method of the reliability of the failure cause judgment of the generator set according to claim 1, characterized by comprising the steps of: in the third step, the reliability R when the failure cause a is determined to be true satisfies R 1 <R≤R 2 。
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202111186278.9A CN113933707B (en) | 2021-10-12 | 2021-10-12 | Self-adjusting method for judging reliability of fault cause of generator set |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202111186278.9A CN113933707B (en) | 2021-10-12 | 2021-10-12 | Self-adjusting method for judging reliability of fault cause of generator set |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN113933707A CN113933707A (en) | 2022-01-14 |
CN113933707B true CN113933707B (en) | 2023-09-19 |
Family
ID=79278841
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202111186278.9A Active CN113933707B (en) | 2021-10-12 | 2021-10-12 | Self-adjusting method for judging reliability of fault cause of generator set |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN113933707B (en) |
Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2007249614A (en) * | 2006-03-16 | 2007-09-27 | Fujitsu Ltd | System device and information collection method |
CN103605787A (en) * | 2013-12-03 | 2014-02-26 | 国家电网公司 | Method and system for evaluating and analyzing relay protection |
CN107065834A (en) * | 2017-05-25 | 2017-08-18 | 东北大学 | The method for diagnosing faults of concentrator in hydrometallurgy process |
CN107103425A (en) * | 2017-04-26 | 2017-08-29 | 哈尔滨电机厂有限责任公司 | Generating equipment running status computer intelligence quantitatively evaluating system |
CN110553821A (en) * | 2019-07-08 | 2019-12-10 | 湖北华电襄阳发电有限公司 | Visualized diagnosis method and system for faults of steam turbine generator unit |
CN110617981A (en) * | 2019-09-16 | 2019-12-27 | 江苏方天电力技术有限公司 | Fault diagnosis method for phase modulator |
CN111650476A (en) * | 2020-07-06 | 2020-09-11 | 国网江苏省电力有限公司沛县供电分公司 | Sampling value method-based single-phase arc ground fault line selection method for power distribution network |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CA2641657A1 (en) * | 2006-02-14 | 2007-08-23 | Edsa Micro Corporation | Systems and methods for real-time system monitoring and predictive analysis |
US8442702B2 (en) * | 2008-10-22 | 2013-05-14 | Airbus Operations Gmbh | Fault diagnosis device and method for optimizing maintenance measures in technical systems |
US10416221B2 (en) * | 2011-03-17 | 2019-09-17 | Abb Schweiz Ag | Voltage based method for fault identification in a transmission line apparatus thereof |
KR102278199B1 (en) * | 2020-12-31 | 2021-07-16 | 주식회사 한국가스기술공사 | Method for managing diagnostic data based on conditional probability |
-
2021
- 2021-10-12 CN CN202111186278.9A patent/CN113933707B/en active Active
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2007249614A (en) * | 2006-03-16 | 2007-09-27 | Fujitsu Ltd | System device and information collection method |
CN103605787A (en) * | 2013-12-03 | 2014-02-26 | 国家电网公司 | Method and system for evaluating and analyzing relay protection |
CN107103425A (en) * | 2017-04-26 | 2017-08-29 | 哈尔滨电机厂有限责任公司 | Generating equipment running status computer intelligence quantitatively evaluating system |
CN107065834A (en) * | 2017-05-25 | 2017-08-18 | 东北大学 | The method for diagnosing faults of concentrator in hydrometallurgy process |
CN110553821A (en) * | 2019-07-08 | 2019-12-10 | 湖北华电襄阳发电有限公司 | Visualized diagnosis method and system for faults of steam turbine generator unit |
CN110617981A (en) * | 2019-09-16 | 2019-12-27 | 江苏方天电力技术有限公司 | Fault diagnosis method for phase modulator |
CN111650476A (en) * | 2020-07-06 | 2020-09-11 | 国网江苏省电力有限公司沛县供电分公司 | Sampling value method-based single-phase arc ground fault line selection method for power distribution network |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
基于模糊集理论的变压器微机差动保护新判据;范文涛, 王广延;中国电机工程学报(第06期);全文 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN113933707A (en) | 2022-01-14 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN107016235B (en) | Equipment running state health degree evaluation method based on multi-feature adaptive fusion | |
CN111275288A (en) | XGboost-based multi-dimensional data anomaly detection method and device | |
WO2023020265A1 (en) | Liquid level balance control method for hydrogen production system and hydrogen production system | |
CN111581597A (en) | Wind turbine generator gearbox bearing temperature state monitoring method based on self-organizing kernel regression model | |
CN110907170B (en) | Wind turbine generator gearbox bearing temperature state monitoring and fault diagnosis method | |
CN111582542B (en) | Power load prediction method and system based on anomaly repair | |
CN108335021A (en) | A kind of method and maintenance decision optimization of wind energy conversion system state Reliability assessment | |
CN114135477B (en) | Dynamic threshold early warning method for monitoring state of machine pump equipment | |
CN115420501B (en) | Gearbox running management and control system based on artificial intelligence | |
CN107654342A (en) | A kind of abnormal detection method of Wind turbines power for considering turbulent flow | |
CN111814848B (en) | Self-adaptive early warning strategy design method for temperature faults of wind turbine generator | |
CN111709181B (en) | Method for predicting fault of polyester filament yarn industrial production process based on principal component analysis | |
CN112700085A (en) | Association rule based method, system and medium for optimizing steady-state operation parameters of complex system | |
CN118017508B (en) | Regional power intelligent control method and system based on power distribution | |
CN113933707B (en) | Self-adjusting method for judging reliability of fault cause of generator set | |
CN112651444B (en) | Self-learning-based non-stationary process anomaly detection method | |
CN112240267B (en) | Fan monitoring method based on wind speed correlation and wind power curve | |
CN111244937B (en) | Method for screening serious faults of transient voltage stability of power system | |
CN117365677A (en) | Steam turbine unit performance health state evaluation method | |
CN116011332A (en) | Wind turbine generator system state monitoring method based on GAN-QP feature migration model | |
CN116151799A (en) | BP neural network-based distribution line multi-working-condition fault rate rapid assessment method | |
CN116664098A (en) | Abnormality detection method and system for photovoltaic power station | |
CN112766657B (en) | Single equipment quality evaluation method based on fault probability and equipment state | |
CN114065433A (en) | Bearing residual service life prediction method based on SMA (shape memory alloy) optimization algorithm | |
CN111884487A (en) | Control method and system of converter and wind power system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |