CN113869993A

CN113869993A - Auditing method, device, equipment and computer readable storage medium

Info

Publication number: CN113869993A
Application number: CN202010531384.5A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 仲阳
Original assignee: China Mobile Communications Group Co Ltd; China Mobile Suzhou Software Technology Co Ltd
Current assignee: China Mobile Communications Group Co Ltd; China Mobile Suzhou Software Technology Co Ltd
Priority date: 2020-06-11
Filing date: 2020-06-11
Publication date: 2021-12-31

Abstract

The application provides an auditing method, device, equipment and a computer readable storage medium, which are used for receiving documents of a project to be audited and sent by a client side to be audited and material information used by the project to be audited; the system can audit the data items matched with each other in the document according to the use information of the material to obtain an audit result; generating an item to be confirmed according to a data item which cannot be matched with the material information in the document; after the item to be confirmed is confirmed, receiving a return result of the auditing client to the item to be confirmed; therefore, an audit report can be generated according to the audit result and the return result, and the comparison and confirmation process of the use information is introduced in the audit process, so that the audit efficiency and the audit quality are improved.

Description

Auditing method, device, equipment and computer readable storage medium

Technical Field

The present application relates to the field of engineering information technology, and relates to, but is not limited to, an auditing method, apparatus, device, and computer storage medium.

Background

Project audit refers to the activities of auditing and checking engineering project work by an auditing organization according to national laws and financial systems, enterprise operating policies, management standards and regulations, and judging whether the engineering project work is legal, reasonable and effective by using scientific methods and programs so as to find errors, correct defects, prevent cheating, improve management and ensure the smooth realization of engineering project targets. The current audits include as-built settlement audits and as-built financial settlement audits.

In the traditional auditing environment, the auditing quality is high, and the auditing method depends on professional operation and personal ability of auditors to a great extent. According to strategic requirements of group development intelligent audit, a rule engine and an association analysis technology are applied to create an engineering intelligent audit mode, and an intelligent audit platform is built to assist auditors to finish audit operation, improve audit work quality and continuously guarantee the safety of company construction project investment.

The related auditing scheme includes: scheme 1: the project audit management system based on the process management is used for the process management of the project audit and covers the whole process of the project audit. Scheme 2: and the project audit system based on quota comparison is used for comparing the quota in the statement of settlement with the standard quota and prompting an auditor to pay attention to the risk of inconsistency with the standard quota.

However, the related auditing scheme suffers from the following drawbacks: scheme 1: the efficiency of auditing work is low due to the fact that the function of automatic data comparison and verification is not available. Scheme 2: the comparison is carried out with the emphasis on the standard quota, when the audit which is inconsistent with the standard quota exists in reality, the accurate judgment cannot be carried out, and the audit quality is poor because the audit is not related to the verification and subtraction of the quota, the material quantity, the material price and the charge rate.

Disclosure of Invention

In view of this, the present application provides an auditing method, apparatus, device and computer-readable storage medium, which can implement comparison and confirmation processes of introducing actual use information in an auditing process, and improve auditing efficiency and auditing quality at the same time.

The technical scheme of the application is realized as follows:

in a first aspect, the present application provides an auditing method, applied to a server, including:

receiving a document of a project to be audited sent by a client side to be audited and material information used by the project to be audited;

auditing data items matched with the material information in the document to obtain an auditing result;

generating an item to be confirmed according to a data item which cannot be matched with the material information in the document;

receiving a return result of the auditing client to the item to be confirmed;

and generating an audit report according to the audit result and the return result, and sending the audit report to the client to be audited.

In a second aspect, the present application provides an auditing apparatus, comprising:

the first receiving module is used for receiving documents of the project to be audited and the material information used by the project to be audited, wherein the documents are sent by the client to be audited;

the auditing module is used for auditing the data items matched with the material information in the document to obtain an auditing result;

the first generation module is used for generating an item to be confirmed according to a data item which cannot be matched with the material information in the document;

the second receiving module is used for receiving a return result of the auditing client to the item to be confirmed;

and the second generation module is used for generating an audit report according to the audit result and the return result and sending the audit report to the client to be audited.

In a third aspect, the present application provides an auditing apparatus, comprising:

a memory for storing executable instructions; and the processor is used for realizing the method when executing the executable instructions stored in the memory.

In a fourth aspect, the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium storing executable instructions for causing a processor to perform the method described above when executed.

The auditing method, the auditing device, the auditing equipment and the computer readable storage medium receive documents of a project to be audited and material information used by the project to be audited, wherein the documents are sent by a client side to be audited; the system can audit the data items matched with each other in the document according to the use information of the material to obtain an audit result; generating an item to be confirmed according to a data item which cannot be matched with the material information in the document; after the item to be confirmed is confirmed, receiving a return result of the auditing client to the item to be confirmed; therefore, an audit report can be generated according to the audit result and the return result, and the comparison and confirmation process of the use information is introduced in the audit process, so that the audit efficiency and the audit quality are improved.

In some embodiments, the settlement audit result can be obtained by auditing the settlement document; receiving a first feedback result of the audit client on the total amount of the materials which cannot be matched with the material information in the settlement document; generating a first return result according to the first feedback result; and summarizing the settlement auditing result and the first returned result to obtain a settlement auditing report, and thus, introducing a process of comparing and confirming the total amount of materials in the auditing process, thereby not only improving the efficiency of settlement auditing, but also improving the quality of the settlement auditing.

In some embodiments, the resolution audit result can be obtained by auditing the resolution document; receiving a second feedback result of a risk item which cannot be matched with the material information in the settlement document by the audit client; generating a second return result according to the second feedback result; therefore, a decision audit report can be generated according to the decision audit result and the second return result, and the comparison and confirmation process of the project information is introduced in the decision audit process, so that the decision audit efficiency and the decision audit quality are improved.

In some embodiments, before a document is audited, a standard format check needs to be performed on the document to determine whether the format of the document conforms to a standard format; when the format of the document does not meet the standard format, the document sent by the client to be audited is received again; when the document meets the standard format, a subsequent normal examination process is executed, so that the standard format of the document is checked before the auditing process, the auditing efficiency is improved, and the auditing quality is also improved.

Drawings

In the drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, like reference numerals may describe similar components in different views. Like reference numerals having different letter suffixes may represent different examples of similar components. The drawings illustrate generally, by way of example, but not by way of limitation, various embodiments discussed herein.

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an implementation flow of an alternative auditing method provided by an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating an implementation flow of an alternative auditing method provided by an embodiment of the present application;

fig. 3 is a schematic flow chart illustrating an implementation of an optional decision audit method according to an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram illustrating an implementation flow of an alternative settlement auditing method provided by an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram illustrating an implementation flow of an alternative auditing method provided by an embodiment of the present application;

fig. 6A is a schematic flow chart illustrating an implementation of an alternative method for automatically auditing settlement of a communication project according to an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 6B is a schematic diagram of an alternative review failure provided by an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 6C is a schematic diagram of an alternative communication engineering settlement auditing system output risk item provided by an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 6D is a schematic diagram illustrating an alternative communications settlement auditing system for allocating exploration tasks according to an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 6E is a schematic diagram of an alternative audit result analysis provided by an embodiment of the present application;

fig. 6F is a schematic diagram illustrating an implementation of an alternative automatic analysis method for a settlement auditing system for communication engineering according to an embodiment of the present application;

fig. 6G is a schematic diagram illustrating an implementation of an alternative automated communication engineering decision auditing method according to an embodiment of the present application;

fig. 6H is a schematic diagram of an alternative automated communication engineering decision task list provided by an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 6I is a schematic diagram of project basic information output by an alternative communication engineering financial settlement auditing system according to an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 6J is a schematic diagram of risk items output by an alternative communication engineering financial settlement auditing system according to an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 6K is a schematic diagram of an audit report output by an alternative communications engineering financial settlement audit system according to an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 7 is a schematic structural diagram of an alternative audit device provided in an embodiment of the present application;

fig. 8 is a schematic structural diagram of an optional audit device according to an embodiment of the present application.

Detailed Description

In order to make the objectives, technical solutions and advantages of the present application clearer, the present application will be described in further detail with reference to the attached drawings, the described embodiments should not be considered as limiting the present application, and all other embodiments obtained by a person of ordinary skill in the art without creative efforts shall fall within the protection scope of the present application.

In the following description, reference is made to "some embodiments" which describe a subset of all possible embodiments, but it is understood that "some embodiments" may be the same subset or different subsets of all possible embodiments, and may be combined with each other without conflict. Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this application belongs. The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the present disclosure.

Example one

The functions realized by the auditing method of the embodiment can be realized by calling a program code through a processor in auditing equipment, and the program code can be saved in a computer readable storage medium.

Fig. 1 is a schematic implementation flow diagram of an optional auditing method provided in an embodiment of the present application, where the auditing method is applied to a server, and as shown in fig. 1, the method includes the following steps:

step S101, receiving documents of the project to be audited sent by the client side to be audited and material information used by the project to be audited.

In some embodiments, the document of the project under review is the original document submitted to the audit system by the project personnel, and this original document may be a document in any format, e.g., tabular format, text format, etc.

The material information used by the project to be checked refers to information such as a list of materials used in the actual implementation process of the project to be checked, the quantity of the used materials, the price of the actually purchased materials, and the brand and the rate of the actually used materials.

And S102, auditing the data items matched with the material information in the document to obtain an auditing result.

In some embodiments, the checking of the data items in the document that match the material information refers to the system comparing each data item in the original document submitted by the project staff with the data item that matches the material information, determining whether the data submitted by the project staff is consistent with the actually used data, and then outputting a preliminary checking result.

And S103, generating an item to be confirmed according to the data item which cannot be matched with the material information in the document.

In some embodiments, if there is a data item that cannot be matched with the material information in the original document submitted by the project staff, the system cannot perform data comparison on the data item that cannot be matched in the submitted document according to the data in the material information, and at this time, the audit staff needs to perform data validity verification offline. Thus, the system displays the unmatched data items that constitute the item to be confirmed.

And step S104, receiving a return result of the auditing client to the item to be confirmed.

Here, an optional implementation manner is that the system displays a list of data items that cannot be confirmed, and after the auditor confirms offline, the auditor submits the result of the offline confirmation at the auditing end; and after receiving the confirmation result submitted by the auditor, the system generates a return result.

In another optional implementation, the system displays an unconfirmable data item list, the project personnel supplements and submits material use information according to the displayed data item list, and the system performs re-auditing on the originally submitted document based on the material information supplemented and submitted by the project personnel to generate a return result.

And step S105, generating an audit report according to the audit result and the return result, and sending the audit report to the client to be audited.

In some embodiments, the system performs comparative analysis on the first generated audit result and the second generated return result to generate a complete audit report.

It is noted that in some embodiments, the system analyzes the complete audit report generated finally, identifies the uncovered quota, material, rate, etc. and feeds back the result to the system, and the system will refer to the result when performing the audit of similar items, so as to optimize the audit rule.

The auditing method provided by the embodiment of the application receives documents of a project to be audited and material information used by the project to be audited, wherein the documents are sent by a client to be audited; the system can audit the data items matched with each other in the document according to the use information of the material to obtain an audit result; generating an item to be confirmed according to a data item which cannot be matched with the material information in the document; after the item to be confirmed is confirmed, receiving a return result of the auditing client to the item to be confirmed; therefore, an audit report can be generated according to the audit result and the return result, and the comparison and confirmation process of the use information is introduced in the audit process, so that the audit efficiency and the audit quality are improved.

Example two

The auditing method in the embodiment of the application comprises the following steps: the method is applied to settlement audit and or settlement audit, and correspondingly, the document of the project to be audited comprises the following steps: settlement documents and/or settlement documents; the data items include material totals and project information. The auditing method is applied to a server, and as shown in FIG. 2, the method comprises the following steps:

step S201, receiving a settlement document of a project to be audited sent by a client side to be audited and material information used by the project to be audited.

In some embodiments, when the auditing method is an auditing method applied to settlement, a settlement document of a project to be audited and material information used by the project to be audited, which are sent by a client to be audited, are received first.

Step S202, comparing the total amount of the materials matched with the material information in the settlement document to obtain a settlement auditing result.

In some embodiments, the data total includes: material usage amount, actual price of the material, etc.

Comparing the total amount of the materials matched with the material information in the settlement document refers to comparing the usage amount and the actual price of the materials matched with each other in the material information in the settlement document, and outputting a settlement auditing result.

Step S203, enumerating the total amount of materials which can not be matched with the material information in the settlement document, and generating a material item list.

In some embodiments, if the original settlement document submitted by the project personnel contains information such as the usage amount of materials, the actual price of the materials, and the like, which cannot be matched with the material information, the information such as the number items, the price items, and the like, which cannot be matched with the material information, are listed, and a material item list is generated.

And step S204, receiving a resolution document of the project to be reviewed and material information used by the project to be reviewed, which are sent by the client to be reviewed.

In some embodiments, when the auditing method is an auditing method applied to decision making, a decision making document of a project to be audited and material information used by the project to be audited are received firstly.

Here, the materials used for the pending project include: the information of a single settlement document required by settlement, an analysis establishment batch file, an investment estimation table, a design batch file, an Approval (Program Approval, PA) project support table, an order table, a transfer table and the like.

And S205, comparing the item information matched with the material information in the settlement document to obtain a settlement auditing result.

In some embodiments, the project information comprises: the comparison of the project information matched with the material information in the settlement document refers to the comparison of the accuracy and the integrity of the project information matched with the material information, the investment information, the construction scale and other information in the settlement document, and the settlement audit result is output.

And step S206, enumerating the item information which can not be matched with the material information in the settlement document, and generating a risk item list.

In some embodiments, if the original settlement document submitted by the project personnel contains information such as project basic information, investment information, construction scale and the like which cannot be matched with the material information, listing the information items which cannot be matched, and generating a risk project list.

And step S207, generating an auditing result according to the settlement auditing result and the settlement auditing result.

In some embodiments, the settlement audit result and the calculation audit result together form an audit result.

And S208, generating an item to be confirmed according to the material item list and the risk item list.

The material item list in the settlement auditing process and the risk item list in the settlement auditing process jointly form an item to be confirmed in the auditing item.

And step S209, receiving a return result of the auditing client to the item to be confirmed.

And step S210, generating an audit report according to the audit result and the return result, and sending the audit report to the client to be audited.

Step S209 and step S210 are the same as the procedure and the function realized by step S105 and step S106 in the above-described embodiment.

According to the auditing method provided by the embodiment of the application, the auditing method can be applied to settlement auditing and settlement auditing, so that auditing results can be obtained by respectively auditing documents of settlement and settlement, and returned results of items to be confirmed of the settlement documents and the settlement documents by the auditing ends are respectively received, so that an auditing report can be generated according to the auditing results and the returned results, and thus, the comparison and confirmation process of use information is introduced in the auditing process, so that the efficiency and quality of the settlement auditing are improved, and the efficiency and quality of the settlement auditing are also improved.

EXAMPLE III

The function realized by the settlement auditing method of the embodiment can be realized by calling a program code through a processor in auditing equipment, and the program code can be saved in a computer readable storage medium.

Fig. 3 is a schematic flow chart of an implementation flow of an optional decision-making auditing method provided by an embodiment of the present application, where the auditing method is applied to a server, and as shown in fig. 3, the method includes the following steps:

step S301, receiving a resolution document of a project to be reviewed and material information used by the project to be reviewed, which are sent by a client to be reviewed.

Step S302, item information matched with the material information in the settlement document is compared to obtain a settlement auditing result.

And step S303, enumerating the item information which cannot be matched with the material information in the settlement document to generate a risk item list.

Steps S301 to S303 are the same as the procedure and the function realized by steps S204 and S206 in the above-described embodiment.

And step S304, generating the item to be confirmed according to the risk item list.

In some embodiments, the risk items include: whether the project cost is possible to be repeatedly charged, whether the condition that the payment amount is inaccurate exists, whether the fund transferring time is inconsistent with the actual project, and the like.

The system displays these risk items for confirmation by auditors or project personnel.

And step S305, receiving a second feedback result of the auditing client to the risk item list.

In some embodiments, an optional implementation manner is that the auditor performs offline confirmation on the risk item displayed by the system, and feeds back an actual confirmation result of the system, where the offline confirmation manner of the auditor may be any manner capable of obtaining a confirmation result, and this embodiment is not particularly limited.

According to another optional implementation mode, the project personnel additionally submits the material information corresponding to the project to be reviewed according to the risk project list displayed by the system.

The two modes can both realize the feedback of the risk item information, and any one of the two modes can be selected at will in actual implementation.

Step S306, comparing the item information matched with the material information in the settlement document again according to the second feedback result to generate a second return result.

In some embodiments, based on the feedback results submitted by auditors or the used materials supplemented by project personnel, the system performs a second audit on the project information in the resolution document that matches the material information to generate a second return result.

And when the second feedback result is the feedback result submitted by the auditor, the second return result is the return result of the auditor.

And step S307, generating a settlement audit report according to the settlement audit result and the second return result, and sending the settlement audit report to the client to be audited.

In some embodiments, a settlement audit report is obtained comparing the settlement audit result and the second returned result.

According to the settlement auditing method provided by the embodiment of the application, a settlement auditing result is obtained by auditing a settlement document; receiving a second feedback result of a risk item which cannot be matched with the material information in the settlement document by the audit client; generating a second return result according to the second feedback result; therefore, a decision audit report can be generated according to the decision audit result and the second return result, and the comparison and confirmation process of the project information is introduced in the decision audit process, so that the decision audit efficiency and the decision audit quality are improved.

Example four

The embodiment of the application provides a settlement auditing method, the functions realized by the settlement auditing method of the embodiment can be realized by calling a program code through a processor in auditing equipment, and the program code can be saved in a computer readable storage medium.

Fig. 4 is a schematic implementation flow diagram of an optional settlement auditing method provided in an embodiment of the present application, where the auditing method is applied to a server, and as shown in fig. 4, the method includes the following steps:

step S401, receiving a settlement document of a project to be audited sent by a client side to be audited and material information used by the project to be audited.

And S402, comparing the total amount of the materials matched with the material information in the settlement document to obtain a settlement auditing result.

Step S403, enumerating the total amount of materials that cannot be matched with the material information in the settlement document, and generating a material item list.

Steps S401 to S403 are the same as the procedure and the function realized in steps S201 and S203 in the above-described embodiment.

And S404, generating the item to be confirmed according to the material item list.

In some embodiments, the material items include: the number of unmatched materials, the price of the unmatched materials and the brand of the unmatched materials, etc.

The system displays the material items for the auditor or project personnel to confirm.

And step S405, receiving a first feedback result of the audit client to the material item list.

In some embodiments, an optional implementation manner is that the auditor performs offline confirmation on the material item displayed by the system, and feeds back an actual confirmation result of the system, where the offline confirmation manner of the auditor may be any manner capable of obtaining a confirmation result, and this embodiment is not limited.

In another optional implementation mode, the project personnel additionally submits the material information corresponding to the project to be reviewed according to the material project list displayed by the system.

The two modes can realize the feedback of the material project information, and any one of the two modes can be selected at will in practical implementation.

Step S406, comparing the total amount of the materials matched with the material information in the settlement document again according to the first feedback result to generate a first return result.

In some embodiments, based on the feedback result submitted by the auditor or the supplementary used materials of the project personnel, the system performs re-audit on the total amount of the materials matched with the material information in the settlement document to generate a first return result.

And when the first feedback result is the feedback result submitted by the auditor, the first return result is the return result of the auditor.

And step S407, summarizing the settlement auditing result and the first returned result to obtain a settlement auditing report, and sending the settlement auditing report to the client to be audited.

In some embodiments, the system summarizes the settlement audit result and the first returned result to obtain a settlement audit report.

The embodiment of the application provides a settlement auditing method, which is characterized in that a settlement auditing result is obtained by auditing a settlement document; receiving a first feedback result of the audit client on the total amount of the materials which cannot be matched with the material information in the settlement document; generating a first return result according to the first feedback result; and summarizing the settlement auditing result and the first returned result to obtain a settlement auditing report, and thus, introducing a process of comparing and confirming the total amount of materials in the auditing process, thereby not only improving the efficiency of settlement auditing, but also improving the quality of the settlement auditing.

EXAMPLE five

Fig. 5 is a schematic implementation flowchart of an optional auditing method provided by an embodiment of the present application, where the auditing method is applied to a server, and as shown in fig. 5, the method includes the following steps:

step S501, receiving documents of the project to be audited sent by the client to be audited and material information used by the project to be audited.

Step S501 is the same as the procedure and the function realized by step S101 in the above-described embodiment.

Step S502, standard format check is carried out on the document.

After project personnel submit original audit documents to the audit system, the audit system can check the submitted original documents in a standard format, so that the audit system can more quickly and efficiently audit the documents.

Step S503, judging whether the format of the document conforms to the standard format.

In some embodiments, when the format of the document conforms to the standard format, step S505 is performed; when the format of the document does not meet the standard, step S504 is performed.

And step S504, re-receiving the document of the project to be audited sent by the client to be audited.

In some embodiments, when the format of the document does not conform to the standard format, the system pops up a "failure to submit" dialog box and prompts in the dialog box which portion of the document is not in the required format, and the project personnel can modify the original document according to the prompt information and then submit the document again.

In some alternative embodiments, the system may also provide a review document template in a standard format, and the project personnel may download the template file and modify the original file against the template file so that the submitted file meets the system's requirements for the format.

And S505, auditing the data items matched with the material information in the document to obtain an auditing result.

And S506, generating an item to be confirmed according to the data item which cannot be matched with the material information in the document.

And step S507, receiving a return result of the audit client to the item to be confirmed.

And step S508, generating an audit report according to the audit result and the return result, and sending the audit report to the client to be audited.

Steps S505 to S508 are the same as the processes and functions realized in steps S102 to S105 in the above-described embodiment.

According to the auditing method provided by the embodiment of the application, before the document is audited, the document needs to be checked for a standard format, and whether the format of the document meets the standard format is judged; when the format of the document does not meet the standard format, the document sent by the client to be audited is received again; when the document meets the standard format, a subsequent normal examination process is executed, so that the standard format of the document is checked before the auditing process, the auditing efficiency is improved, and the auditing quality is also improved.

EXAMPLE six

The embodiment of the application provides an auditing method, which takes settlement auditing of communication engineering and financial settlement auditing of the communication engineering as examples for explanation. In the embodiment of the application, the automatic communication engineering settlement audit automatically completes the settlement analysis through a machine, including quota comparison, the quantity of the materials for the first and second supplies, the price of the materials for the first and second supplies and the rate, intelligently completes the distribution of audit exploration tasks according to historical data, summarizes and analyzes the risk trend according to the data of a settlement table, and optimizes the settlement logic.

Fig. 6A is a schematic view of an implementation flow of an optional automatic settlement auditing method for a communication project according to an embodiment of the present application, where as shown in fig. 6A, the settlement auditing method for a communication project includes the following steps:

and step S601, settling and submitting the submission files.

Project managers of project department submit settlement audit documents to the project audit management system 601, and the project audit management system 601 transfers the settlement documents to the project settlement audit system 602.

And step S602, submitting the document to be examined for normative check.

Project settlement auditing system 602 performs standard format checks on submitted settlement documents, and if the submitted settlement documents are found to be not compliant with the document input standards, causes of errors and non-compliance are prompted. As shown in FIG. 6B, when the submitted submission document is not qualified, a "failure to submit" dialog box 603 pops up, and indicates that the reason for the failure is "no statement".

In some embodiments, the project settlement auditing system will provide settlement templates and offline verification tools to facilitate self-verification by each project manager.

And step S603, performing preliminary audit by the project settlement auditing system.

After the document is verified, the communication engineering settlement auditing system can pull corresponding single materials from the one-way management platform, analyze the materials to be audited according to the direct audit content 604, output the initial audit result of the system and automatically generate an exploration task 605.

And step S604, auditing is started by an auditing agency.

In the auditing stage of the auditing agency, personnel of the auditing agency need to check the initial auditing results output by the settlement auditing system of the communication engineering, confirm each risk of occurrence of auditing, perform exploration on exploration tasks 604 distributed by the system and register the exploration results.

Fig. 6C is a schematic diagram of an output risk item of the optional communication engineering settlement auditing system according to the embodiment of the present application. As shown in fig. 6C, auditors of the audit organization need to confirm the risk item 606 that "material corresponding to the quota is not present in the balance table".

Fig. 6D is a schematic diagram of an alternative communication engineering settlement auditing system allocating exploration tasks according to an embodiment of the present application. As shown in fig. 6D, two tasks of site survey by the auditor are required to occur in the system, and after the auditor confirms the survey, the result of the survey needs to be registered in the system and submitted.

Step S605, finalize the settlement table.

The auditor generates settlement table draft files according to the audit settlement table 607 of the audit organization and the reconnaissance task 608 completed by the audit organization, and the audit organization uploads the draft settlement table to the communication engineering settlement auditing system after finishing draft.

Step S606, the project settlement auditing system conducts the logic audit of the settled documents.

The project settlement auditing system performs logic check on the finalized file preliminarily generated in step S605. And the project settlement auditing system automatically compares the machine audit result with the auditing result of an auditing mechanism and outputs a final comparison result.

And step S607, the audit report is approved and circulated, and an audit report is generated.

And (4) transferring the comparison result generated in the step (S606) to the project audit management system, and outputting an audit report 609 by the project audit management system.

And step S608, analyzing the audit report by the engineering settlement audit system to generate a risk report.

Fig. 6E is a schematic diagram of optional audit result analysis provided in the embodiment of the present application, and as shown in fig. 6E, the engineering settlement auditing system outputs a risk report 610, and an auditor can identify that quota, material, rate, and other penalties are not covered by analyzing the risk report, and feed the result back to the engineering settlement auditing system, and implement optimization of the rule of audit reduction through a feedback learning loop 611.

In some embodiments, the implementation of step S603 described above includes the following steps, as shown in fig. 6F:

and step S6031, starting the project audit process.

And step S6032, the project settlement auditing system carries out normative check on the submission files.

If the review file normalization check is passed, the process proceeds to step S6033, and if the review file normalization check is not passed, the process returns to step S6031 to restart.

Step S6033, electronize tables I to V.

The system electronizes the forms submitted by the project personnel so that the system can check the forms conveniently.

And step S6034, collecting related data by the project settlement auditing system.

The project settlement auditing system collects data related to auditing: a material balance table 612, a regression database 613, Global Positioning System (GPS) coordinates 614, and a single project file 615.

Step S6035: and auditing the third meter by auditors A, B and C respectively.

Step S6036: and auditing the audit material by auditors A and B.

Step S6037: and (4) auditing the rate by an auditor.

Step S6038: the subtraction is combined with the calculation/aggregation.

In the embodiment of the application, the core of the settlement auditing method for the communication engineering comprises the following points:

a. quota high-set: through the analysis of the historical reduction rate, the high reduction rate is summarized and the reason for the generation of the high reduction rate is analyzed. Examples are: the elevation height of the construction site is acquired through the GPS coordinates, and whether the construction site is a hilly area or a high-elevation area is judged, so that whether a high sleeve exists in the quota is judged. The current system covers over 60 high-set quotients.

b. And (3) checking the quantity of the materials A and B: the quantity of first confession material all has the standing book in the material management system among the communication engineering, combines the first confession material quantity that single project received to can judge whether its material quantity is reasonable. If the first supply material has nuclear subtraction, the corresponding quota using the first supply material is inevitably subjected to trial subtraction, and the quota and the second supply material have a correlation relationship, so that whether the quantity of the second supply material is reasonable or not is judged.

c. Price reduction of materials A and B: the first supply material can be inquired through historical purchasing data. The price of the built-in city information can be used for carrying out the reduction on the price of the second supply material. If the price of the second supply material of the same type does not exist in the system, the rationality of the price of the second supply material to be checked can be inferred according to the same material price in the history of the city.

d. And (4) rate reduction: the rate reduction includes construction land and comprehensive compensation charge, construction unit management charge, feasibility research charge, research and test charge, investigation design charge, environmental impact evaluation charge, labor safety and sanitation evaluation charge, construction project supervision charge, safe production charge, project quality supervision charge, project quota determination charge, other charges for introducing technology and equipment, project insurance charge, project bid agency charge, patent and special technology use charge, production preparation and development charge (operation charge). The system performs the check and reduction of the rationality and the price of different types of expenses based on different rules.

In the embodiment of the application, the settlement audit of the communication engineering is as follows: auditing is carried out through rating comparison, deduction of the quantity of the materials supplied by A and B, deduction of the price of the materials supplied by A and B, deduction of the rate and the like; and intelligently finishing the distribution of audit exploration tasks according to historical data, and summarizing and analyzing risk trends according to statement data so as to achieve the purpose of optimizing the reduction logic.

Fig. 6G is a schematic diagram illustrating an implementation of an optional automated communication engineering decision auditing method according to an embodiment of the present application, where as shown in fig. 6G, the communication engineering financial decision auditing includes the following steps:

and step S609, final settlement and submission of the audit file.

Project managers of project department submit settlement review documents to project audit management system 601, and project audit management system transfers settlement files to project settlement audit system 616.

And step S610, submitting the normative examination of the document to be examined.

The project settlement audit system checks the submitted settlement document in a standard format, and if the settlement document is found not to meet the document input standard, the project settlement audit system prompts the reasons of errors and non-compliance.

And step S611, performing preliminary audit by the project settlement audit system.

As shown in fig. 6H, after the settlement document passes the verification, the communication engineering financial settlement auditing system performs a settlement basic information extraction process 617, extracts information such as individual settlement documents, analysis settlement batch files, investment estimation tables, design batch files, PA project support tables, order tables, and transfer tables required for settlement, and automatically outputs data required in the auditing manuscript and risk items 618 analyzed by the system.

The core automatic auditing method for the automatic auditing of the engineering decision accounting auditing system comprises the following contents:

a. whether the project is incorporated into a fixed asset investment plan.

b. Whether or not there is a standing approval or supplementary approval.

c. Whether the investment estimate table amount is consistent with the investigatable report of investigatable batch reply.

d. Whether the amount of the standing reply exceeds the amount of the investment plan.

e. Whether the project approval is earlier than the time of the investment plan.

f. Whether there is design replication and audition discipline.

g. Whether the design copy amount breaks through the establishment or not is consistent with the design budget amount.

h. Whether the design replication scale breaks through the project replication scale or not.

i. Whether the time for repeating is earlier than the time for repeating the standing item is designed.

j. Whether the contract is repaired after construction exists or not.

k. The completion/decision-making trial is delayed, and the completion is delayed.

l, too short or too long test run time.

m, whether the actual investment exceeds the design budget.

n, whether the completion settlement table is standardized or not and whether the basic information is completely listed or not.

And o, whether the design is changed in the super-scale construction or not.

p, comparing the whole process of materials.

And q, checking construction contents and checking whether the project is the project.

r, whether the project cost is repeatedly checked.

And s, whether the amount of the fund payment is inaccurate exists or not.

t, whether the table split value is reasonable or not, and whether the contract value or the split value is negative or not exist.

u, whether the transferring time is inconsistent with the actual project.

And step S612, auditing is started by an auditing agency.

In the auditing stage of the auditing agency, auditing agency personnel need to check an initial examination result output by the communication engineering financial settlement auditing system, verify perfect basic information 619, verify suspected risk items of settlement auditing 620 and output a settlement file, wherein the verification content of the auditing personnel comprises the following three aspects:

a. and confirming the data analyzed by the system. Including whether the project basic information, the investment information and the construction scale information are complete and accurate.

As shown in fig. 6I, auditors of the auditing agency need to perform accuracy and integrity validation on the basic information of the project shown in fig. 6I.

b. And confirming the risk entries 618 analyzed by the financial settlement auditing system, and feeding back whether the risk entries are effective or not.

As shown in fig. 6J, an auditor of the auditing organization needs to confirm the risk item shown in fig. 6J, confirm whether the risk item is valid, and input a confirmation result to the communication engineering financial settlement auditing system.

c. And the financial settlement auditing system automatically outputs a settlement auditing report according to the data analyzed by the financial settlement auditing system by the auditors and the confirmation result of the risk items.

As shown in FIG. 6K, the audit report includes the audit results of various projects, which can be viewed by project personnel at any time as required.

Step S613, the project settlement auditing system checks the logic of the settled documents.

And the project settlement auditing system performs logic check on the finalized file generated preliminarily in the step S612. And the engineering decision audit system automatically compares the machine audit result with the audit result of the audit organization and outputs a final comparison result.

And S614, the audit report is approved and circulated, and an audit report is generated.

The comparison result generated in step S613 is transferred to the project audit management system 601, and the project audit management system 601 outputs an audit report 621.

And step S615, the project settlement auditing system analyzes the audit report and generates a risk report.

The project resolution audit system outputs a risk report 622 including information of data extraction errors and risk items of the errors, and auditors compare the results and feed back the results to the project resolution audit system to realize optimization of the audit manuscript rules through a feedback learning loop 611.

In the embodiment of the application, the financial settlement auditing method of the communication engineering covers 6 modules of project compliance, design compliance, construction compliance, material purchasing and using, expense condition and material transferring, automatically outputs risk items and has certain intelligence.

The technical scheme of the embodiment of the application focuses on data auditing and is used for finding problems existing in engineering auditing, but not simple flow management. The technical scheme of the embodiment of the application not only covers standard quota comparison, but also adds more quota reasonability analysis, material quantity analysis, material price analysis and rate reasonability analysis, and automatically generates exploration tasks according to analysis results, thereby effectively reducing risks such as subjective exploration task selection in the auditing process.

EXAMPLE seven

The embodiment provides an auditing device, which comprises modules and sub-modules, wherein the sub-modules can be realized by a processor in auditing equipment; of course, it may also be implemented by logic circuitry; in the implementation Process, the processor may be a Central Processing Unit (CPU), a Microprocessor Unit (MPU), a Digital Signal Processor (DSP), a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), or the like.

Fig. 7 is a schematic structural diagram of an optional audit device provided in an embodiment of the present application, and as shown in fig. 7, the audit device 70 includes:

the first receiving module 71 is configured to receive a document of the pending project sent by the pending client and material information used by the pending project.

And the auditing module 72 is configured to audit the data items in the document, which are matched with the material information, to obtain an auditing result.

The first generating module 73 is configured to generate an item to be confirmed according to a data item that cannot be matched with the material information in the document.

And a second receiving module 74, configured to receive a return result of the audit client to the item to be confirmed.

And a second generating module 75, configured to generate an audit report according to the audit result and the return result, and send the audit report to the client to be audited.

In some embodiments, the documents of the pending project include: settlement documents and/or settlement documents; the data items include material totals and project information.

In some embodiments, the auditing module 72 includes a first auditing module, configured to compare the total amount of materials in the settlement document that match the material information with each other, so as to obtain a settlement auditing result.

In some embodiments, the auditing module 72 includes a second auditing module, configured to compare item information in the resolution document that matches the material information to obtain a resolution auditing result.

In some embodiments, the first generation module 73 includes a first generation sub-module for enumerating material totals in the settlement document that cannot be matched with the material information to generate a bill of materials items.

In some embodiments, the first generating module 73 includes a second generating sub-module, configured to enumerate item information that cannot be matched with the material information in the settlement document, and generate a risk item list.

In some embodiments, the first generating module 73 is further configured to generate the item to be confirmed according to the bill of material items and the bill of risk items.

In some embodiments, the second receiving module 74 includes a first receiving sub-module for receiving a first feedback result of the audit client to the bill of materials;

in some embodiments, the apparatus further includes a third generating module, configured to compare material information in the settlement document, which is matched with the material information, again according to the first feedback result, and generate a first return result.

In some embodiments, the second receiving module 74 further includes a second receiving submodule, configured to receive a second feedback result of the auditing client to the risk item list.

In some embodiments, the apparatus further includes a fourth generating module, configured to compare, again according to the second feedback result, item information in the resolution document that matches the material information, and generate a second return result.

In some embodiments, the second generation module 75 includes a third generation sub-module configured to aggregate the settlement audit result and the first return result to obtain a settlement audit report.

In some embodiments, the second generating module 75 includes a fourth generating sub-module, configured to aggregate the decision audit result and the second returned result to obtain a decision audit report.

In some embodiments, the second generating module 75 is further configured to generate the audit report according to the settlement audit report and the settlement audit report.

In some embodiments, the apparatus further comprises a checking module configured to perform a standard format check on the document before reviewing data items in the document that match the material information.

In some embodiments, the document is audited when its format conforms to a standard format.

In some embodiments, the document of the pending item sent by the pending client is re-received when the format of the document does not conform to a standard format.

It should be noted that the description of the apparatus in the embodiment of the present application is similar to the description of the method embodiment, and has similar beneficial effects to the method embodiment, and therefore, the description is not repeated. For technical details not disclosed in the embodiments of the present apparatus, reference is made to the description of the method embodiments of the present application for understanding.

Example eight

In the embodiment of the present application, if the auditing method is implemented in the form of a software functional module and is sold or used as a stand-alone product, the auditing method may also be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on such understanding, the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention may be embodied in the form of a software product, which is stored in a computer-readable storage medium and includes several instructions for causing a terminal to execute all or part of the methods according to the embodiments of the present invention. And the aforementioned computer-readable storage media comprise: various media capable of storing program codes, such as a usb disk, a removable hard disk, a Read Only Memory (ROM), a magnetic disk, or an optical disk. Thus, embodiments of the invention are not limited to any specific combination of hardware and software.

Correspondingly, an embodiment of the present application provides an audit device, including: a memory for storing executable instructions; and the processor is used for realizing the auditing method provided by the embodiment when executing the executable instructions stored in the memory.

The embodiment of the application provides a computer-readable storage medium, which stores executable instructions for causing a processor to implement the auditing method provided by the above embodiment when executed.

Fig. 8 is a schematic structural diagram of an optional audit device provided in an embodiment of the present application, and as shown in fig. 8, the audit device 80 at least includes: a processor 81, a communication interface 82, and a computer-readable storage medium 83 configured to store executable instructions, wherein: processor 81 generally controls the overall operation of audit device 80.

The communication interface 82 may enable the auditing device to communicate with other devices over a network.

The computer-readable storage medium 83 is configured to store instructions and applications executable by the processor 81, and may also buffer data to be processed or processed by each module in the to-be-processed processor 81 and the auditing device 80, and may be implemented by a FLASH Memory (FLASH) or a Random Access Memory (RAM).

It should be appreciated that reference throughout this specification to "one embodiment" or "an embodiment" means that a particular feature, structure or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, the appearances of the phrases "in one embodiment" or "in an embodiment" in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. It should be understood that, in various embodiments of the present invention, the sequence numbers of the above-mentioned processes do not mean the execution sequence, and the execution sequence of each process should be determined by its function and inherent logic, and should not constitute any limitation on the implementation process of the embodiments of the present invention. The above-mentioned serial numbers of the embodiments of the present invention are merely for description and do not represent the merits of the embodiments.

It should be noted that, in this document, the terms "comprises", "comprising" or any other variation thereof are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, so that a process, a method or an apparatus including a series of elements includes not only those elements but also other elements not explicitly listed or inherent to such process, method or apparatus. Without further limitation, an element defined by the phrase "comprising an … …" does not exclude the presence of other like elements in a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises the element. In the several embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed apparatus and method may be implemented in other ways. The above-described device embodiments are merely illustrative, for example, the division of the unit is only a logical functional division, and there may be other division ways in actual implementation, such as: multiple units or components may be combined, or may be integrated into another system, or some features may be omitted, or not implemented.

The units described as separate parts may or may not be physically separate, and parts displayed as units may or may not be physical units; can be located in one place or distributed on a plurality of network units; some or all of the units can be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of the embodiment. Those of ordinary skill in the art will understand that: all or part of the steps for realizing the method embodiments can be completed by hardware related to program instructions, the program can be stored in a computer readable storage medium, and the program executes the steps comprising the method embodiments when executed; and the aforementioned computer-readable storage media comprise: various media that can store program code, such as removable storage devices, read-only memories, magnetic or optical disks, etc. Alternatively, the integrated unit of the present invention may be stored in a computer-readable storage medium if it is implemented in the form of a software functional module and sold or used as a separate product. Based on such understanding, the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention may be embodied in the form of a software product, which is stored in a computer-readable storage medium and includes several instructions for causing a terminal to execute all or part of the methods according to the embodiments of the present invention. And the aforementioned computer-readable storage media comprise: a removable storage device, a ROM, a magnetic or optical disk, or other various media that can store program code.

The above description is only an embodiment of the present invention, but the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto, and any person skilled in the art can easily conceive of changes or substitutions within the technical scope of the present invention, and all such changes or substitutions are included in the scope of the present invention. Therefore, the protection scope of the present invention shall be subject to the protection scope of the appended claims.

In the several embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed apparatus and method may be implemented in other ways. The above-described device embodiments are merely illustrative, for example, the division of the unit is only a logical functional division, and there may be other division ways in actual implementation, such as: multiple units or components may be combined, or may be integrated into another system, or some features may be omitted, or not implemented. In addition, the coupling, direct coupling or communication connection between the components shown or discussed may be through some interfaces, and the indirect coupling or communication connection between the devices or units may be electrical, mechanical or other forms.

In addition, all the functional units in the embodiments of the present invention may be integrated into one processing module, or each unit may be separately used as one unit, or two or more units may be integrated into one unit; the integrated unit can be realized in a form of hardware, or in a form of hardware plus a software functional unit. Those of ordinary skill in the art will understand that: all or part of the steps for implementing the method embodiments may be implemented by hardware related to program instructions, and the program may be stored in a computer readable storage medium, and when executed, the program performs the steps including the method embodiments; and the aforementioned storage medium includes: a mobile storage device, a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a Random Access Memory (RAM), a magnetic disk or an optical disk, and other various media capable of storing program codes.

The methods disclosed in the several method embodiments provided in the present application may be combined arbitrarily without conflict to obtain new method embodiments.

Features disclosed in several of the product embodiments provided in the present application may be combined in any combination to yield new product embodiments without conflict.

The features disclosed in the several method or apparatus embodiments provided in the present application may be combined arbitrarily, without conflict, to arrive at new method embodiments or apparatus embodiments.

The above description is only for the specific embodiments of the present invention, but the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto, and any person skilled in the art can easily conceive of the changes or substitutions within the technical scope of the present invention, and all the changes or substitutions should be covered within the scope of the present invention. Therefore, the protection scope of the present invention shall be subject to the protection scope of the appended claims.

Claims

1. An auditing method, applied to a server, the method comprising:

receiving a return result of the auditing client to the item to be confirmed;

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the documents of the pending project comprise: settlement documents and/or settlement documents; the data items include material totals and project information;

the auditing the data items matched with the material information in the document to obtain an auditing result comprises:

comparing the total amount of the materials matched with the material information in the settlement document to obtain a settlement auditing result; and/or the presence of a gas in the gas,

and comparing the item information matched with the material information in the settlement document to obtain a settlement auditing result.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein generating items to be confirmed according to data items in the document that cannot be matched with the material information comprises:

enumerating the total amount of materials which cannot be matched with the material information in the settlement document to generate a material item list; and/or the presence of a gas in the gas,

listing the project information which cannot be matched with the material information in the settlement document to generate a risk project list;

and generating the item to be confirmed according to the material item list and the risk item list.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the return result comprises a first return result when the auditing method is used to implement settlement processing of the settlement document;

correspondingly, the receiving and auditing client returns the result of the item to be confirmed by the auditing client, and the result includes:

receiving a first feedback result of the auditing client to the bill of material items;

and comparing the total amount of the materials matched with the material information in the settlement document again according to the first feedback result to generate a first return result.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein when said auditing method is used to implement resolution processing on said resolution document, said returned results further comprise a second returned result;

correspondingly, the receiving the returned result of the auditing client to the item to be confirmed further includes:

receiving a second feedback result of the auditing client to the risk item list;

and comparing the item information matched with the material information in the settlement document again according to the second feedback result to generate a second return result.

6. The method of claim 4 or 5, wherein generating an audit report based on the audit result and the return result comprises:

summarizing the settlement auditing result and the first returned result to obtain a settlement auditing report; and/or the presence of a gas in the gas,

summarizing the settlement audit result and the second return result to obtain a settlement audit report;

and generating the audit report according to the settlement audit report and the settlement audit report.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

before auditing data items which are matched with the material information in the document, carrying out standard format check on the document;

when the format of the document conforms to the standard format, auditing the document;

and when the format of the document does not conform to the standard format, re-receiving the document of the project to be audited sent by the client to be audited.

8. An auditing apparatus, the apparatus comprising:

9. An audit device, comprising:

a memory for storing executable instructions; a processor for implementing the method of any one of claims 1 to 7 when executing executable instructions stored in the memory.

10. A computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon executable instructions for causing a processor, when executed, to implement the method of any one of claims 1 to 7.