CN113795727A - Method for evaluating a manifest by means of a manifest evaluation system and a manifest evaluation system - Google Patents
Method for evaluating a manifest by means of a manifest evaluation system and a manifest evaluation system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN113795727A CN113795727A CN202080034169.2A CN202080034169A CN113795727A CN 113795727 A CN113795727 A CN 113795727A CN 202080034169 A CN202080034169 A CN 202080034169A CN 113795727 A CN113795727 A CN 113795727A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- manifest
- evaluation system
- evaluated
- truck
- waiting time
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 92
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 27
- 238000012384 transportation and delivery Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000013475 authorization Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013439 planning Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003442 weekly effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/08—Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
- G06Q10/087—Inventory or stock management, e.g. order filling, procurement or balancing against orders
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01C—MEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
- G01C21/00—Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in groups G01C1/00 - G01C19/00
- G01C21/26—Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in groups G01C1/00 - G01C19/00 specially adapted for navigation in a road network
- G01C21/34—Route searching; Route guidance
- G01C21/3407—Route searching; Route guidance specially adapted for specific applications
- G01C21/343—Calculating itineraries, i.e. routes leading from a starting point to a series of categorical destinations using a global route restraint, round trips, touristic trips
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/04—Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem"
- G06Q10/047—Optimisation of routes or paths, e.g. travelling salesman problem
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/08—Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/08—Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
- G06Q10/083—Shipping
-
- G06Q50/40—
Abstract
The invention relates to a method for evaluating a manifest (12) for a truck (14) by means of a manifest evaluation system (10), wherein a waiting time (18) of the truck (14) is detected and a driving route (20) of the truck (14) is determined as a function of the detected waiting time (18), and the manifest (12) is evaluated as a function thereof by means of an electronic computing device (16) of the manifest evaluation system (10), wherein a loading state (22) of the truck (14) is detected during the driving route (20) and the manifest (12) is evaluated as a function of the detected loading state (22) by means of the electronic computing device (16). The invention also relates to a manifest evaluation system (10).
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to a method for evaluating a manifest for a truck by means of a manifest evaluation system, wherein the waiting time of the truck is detected, and the driving route of the truck is determined as a function of the detected waiting time, and the manifest is evaluated on the basis thereof by means of an electronic computing device of the manifest evaluation system. The invention also relates to a freight note evaluation system.
Background
For this purpose, various possibilities are known from the prior art for determining the best route for the delivery of the orders or the best route which enables a plurality of orders to be completed.
For example, US 2014/0324633 a1 discloses a computer system and an associated method for implementing an online goods services market. The shipper's published shipping service offers on the market match the shipper's query. The federated service offer consists of a freight service offer: i.e., it has service parameters that take into account the shipping parameters of the shipping service request. The syndicated service offer selected by the sender is prepared and reserved for later shipment. Role-based market access control limits the visibility of secret information, such as carrier pricing and shipper identity, for example. "automated simplification of the shipping process" includes shipper payment clearing and invoice making. The state tracking functionality may be supplemented by new planning and/or alarms during the transport to minimize the impact of common problems that may threaten ongoing shipments.
Furthermore, US 2011/0119200a1 discloses a method and system for determining a fare and fee mechanism that is capable of determining additional charges for extra legs, dwell times and overtime transit legs beyond the time and leg of the individual service for the agreed transit. According to the method, after receiving a waiting time, a loading time, a completion time, a rest time, a discharge time, an extra time, and an additional loading instruction, the vehicle-mounted device receives position information of the transportation vehicle from the GPS satellite, and associates information corresponding to the received instruction with the position information and a time of receipt of the instruction to be stored as service data. The server determines a reference freight rate based on the specified loading and unloading points. Based on the information about the additional landing instructions found from the service data, the server determines an additional driving distance to determine an additional distance charge for the additional driving distance. The server determines the following time period: during this time, the time required at each of the loading and unloading points exceeds a prescribed reference time to form a stay time to determine a stay charge thereof. The server determines the distance traveled late at night and early in the morning and the distance traveled on weekdays and legal festivals to determine its overtime shipping charges.
Disclosure of Invention
The object of the invention is to provide a method for evaluating a manifest and a manifest evaluation system, by means of which a better evaluation of the manifest is possible.
This task is achieved by a method and a manifest evaluation system according to the independent claims. Advantageous embodiments are described in the dependent claims.
One aspect of the invention relates to a method for evaluating a manifest for a truck by means of a manifest evaluation system, in which the waiting time of the truck is detected, and the driving route of the truck is determined as a function of the detected waiting time and the manifest is evaluated accordingly by means of an electronic computing device of the manifest evaluation system.
Provision is made for the loading state of the truck in the driving route to be detected and for the manifest to be evaluated also as a function of the detected loading state by means of the electronic computing device.
Thereby allowing better evaluation of the manifest in terms of both waiting time and loading status. In particular, it is thereby possible to also evaluate the manifest, for example in terms of money. Thus, the dispatcher can determine whether to accept the manifest. Evaluation takes place with regard to waiting times and loading status.
"full", "partial" or "empty" can be considered in particular as a loaded state.
In particular, for this purpose, for example, the change costs and the fixed costs can also be entered into the freight-note evaluation system by the dispatcher via an input device. In particular, it is thus possible to determine, for example, the cost by using the waiting time and using the loading status to evaluate the manifest.
Preferably, provision can be made for a plurality of invoices to be completed in one route. In other words, a plurality of bills of lading can be executed with one driving route. For this purpose, the truck may travel from a first destination, for example, accepting a first manifest, to a second destination, for example, accepting a second manifest. At the third location, two shipments may then be settled, for example. In particular, empty vehicle travel can thereby be detected, for example, as a loaded state or only a partially loaded state. Therefore, the loading and unloading time can be considered together in the freight bill evaluation.
The corresponding times and costs occurring on a particular route can therefore be taken into account by means of the manifest evaluation system, so that the profitability of future routes can be evaluated by means of the manifest evaluation system.
In addition, the manifest evaluation system allows the corresponding evaluation of the manifest by the transport provider and the storage thereof, for example, in an electronic computing device of the manifest evaluation system. They may thereafter be tabulated where the manifest with the most positive rating is rated higher than the manifest with the negative rating. Therefore, for example, an evaluation of the client may be output. This allows, in particular, the user of the manifest evaluation system to evaluate the customer accordingly, so that, in particular, the corresponding authorization conditions can be better agreed upon.
According to one advantageous embodiment, the invoice is automatically accepted by means of the electronic computing device as a function of the evaluation of the invoice. In other words, the manifest may be received via the manifest evaluation system, then the manifest evaluated and then the manifest may be automatically accepted via the electronic computing device. In particular, it can be provided, for example, that the invoice is to be evaluated in terms of money, so that whether the invoice is automatically accepted is determined by means of a money threshold. It is thereby possible to automatically accept the manifest by means of the manifest evaluation system.
It has also proved advantageous if the manifest evaluation system has an input device and the waiting time and/or the loading state is detected by input from a user of the manifest evaluation system. In other words, it can be provided, for example, that the waiting time and/or the loading state are manually entered by the user. In particular, it is here historical data about waiting times and/or loading status. In particular, this allows the manifest or future similar manifests to be evaluated reliably. Thereby providing a better manifest evaluation system.
In a further advantageous embodiment, position information of the truck navigation device is used for determining the waiting time and/or loading state information is used for determining the loading state. In particular, a GPS position can thus be determined, for example, by means of a navigation device. It is thereby possible to reliably determine the current position of the truck. In particular, waiting times, loading and unloading times and rest times, for example, in the national borders can be reliably determined thereby. These may then be considered in the manifest evaluation. It is also possible to give loading status information, in particular regarding weight, volume, delivery date, loading counter and/or loading date. The data may be utilized, for example, by a Transportation Management System (TMS). Information about the goods and departure times and delivery times and their positions can thus be evaluated by means of the manifest evaluation system.
It has also proven advantageous to evaluate the freight note also in dependence on the driver operating state of the truck driver in the route. In particular, the driving of the truck, the driver's work hours or loading and unloading and further waiting times can be regarded as the driver operating state. These parameters can thus also be taken into account when evaluating the manifest. The manifest can be better evaluated.
It has also proven advantageous to determine the driver operating state by means of an application of the driver's mobile terminal. In particular, detailed information about the current operating state of the driver can be obtained thereby. In particular, it can be used for driver waiting times, for example in front of loading docks, at borders or at other checkpoints. The mobile terminal can be designed, for example, as a smartphone, a so-called smartphone. This allows the driving order to be evaluated in a cost-effective but still reliable manner.
It is also advantageous to evaluate the manifest also in terms of the type of goods of the manifest in the route of the vehicle. In particular, fixed costs as well as variable costs and goods profitability can be taken into account in the goods type. In addition, customs regulations and waiting times at the loading dock may be utilized, for example, based on the cargo. For example, if profitable cargo is loaded, a longer empty trip or partial empty trip may still be profitable. In particular, provision is made for the information about the goods to be encrypted. Thereby enabling a better evaluation of the manifest.
According to a further advantageous embodiment, at least the waiting time and/or the loading state are stored in a memory device of the manifest evaluation system, and the manifest is evaluated as a function of the stored waiting time and/or the stored loading state. The storage device may be provided in the truck or alternatively, the storage device may be provided as an external storage device of the truck. For example, the storage device can be provided in the form of a backend server or a cloud server. This allows information about the waiting time and the loading state to be transmitted to the back-end server by means of the transmission device of the truck, so that the user of the slip evaluation system can directly access the information and can evaluate the slip in advance. In particular, the corresponding manifest can be reliably evaluated on the basis of historical information, i.e. the stored waiting times and/or the stored loading states. In particular, a list of the respective freight notes in terms of their profitability can thus be listed. Thereby enabling a reliable evaluation of the manifest to be performed.
In a further advantageous embodiment, the route is determined by means of a manifest evaluation system as a function of at least two evaluated manifests, in particular as a function of a plurality of evaluated manifests. "plurality" means in particular more than two shipments. In particular, the best driving route is then determined from a plurality of orders by means of an order evaluation system. In particular, the respective waiting times and the respective loading states can then be taken into account when determining the route, so that a better route can be determined. In particular, it is thus possible to better determine whether the driving route is profitable.
It has also proved advantageous if at least the waiting time and/or the loading state are weighted according to the decision criterion and the manifest is evaluated according to the weighted waiting time and the weighted loading state. In other words, the waiting time and the loading status may be weighted differently. For example, both the waiting time and the loading state can be allocated a monetary value for this purpose. The monetary values may be different from each other. For example, the loading status may be weighted lower than the waiting time. In particular, a corresponding list with a corresponding weight, such as a monetary estimate of the manifest, may then be listed. Whereby a better evaluation of the manifest can be performed.
A further aspect of the invention relates to a manifest evaluation system for evaluating a manifest for a truck, having an electronic computing device, wherein the manifest evaluation system is designed for carrying out the method according to one of the preceding aspects. In particular, the method is performed by means of a manifest evaluation system.
An advantageous design of the method will be seen as an advantageous design of the manifest evaluation system. For this purpose, the manifest evaluation system has the subject-matter of allowing the method or an advantageous embodiment thereof to be carried out.
Further advantages, features and details of the invention result from the following description of a preferred embodiment and from the figures. The features and feature combinations mentioned above in the description and the features and feature combinations mentioned below in the description of the figures and/or shown in the figures alone can be used not only in the respectively indicated combination but also in other combinations or alone without going beyond the scope of the present invention.
Drawings
The figure here shows a schematic side view of an embodiment of the shipment order evaluation system.
In the figures, identical or functionally identical elements are provided with the same reference signs.
Detailed Description
One embodiment of a manifest evaluation system 10 is shown in a side view schematic diagram. The manifest evaluation system 10 is designed for evaluating a manifest 12 for a truck 14. The manifest evaluation system 10 has an electronic computing device 16. In the present embodiment, the electronic computing device 16 is configured outside the truck. For example, the electronic computing device 16 may be provided as a backend server or a cloud server.
In the method for evaluating a manifest 12, the waiting times 18 of the trucks 14 are detected and the driving routes 20 of the trucks 14 are determined as a function of the detected waiting times 18. The manifest 12 is evaluated accordingly by means of the electronic computing device 16.
Provision is made for the loading state 22 of the cargo vehicle 14 in the drive route 20 to be detected and for the manifest 12 to be evaluated by means of the electronic computing device also as a function of the detected loading state 22.
Thereby allowing the manifest 12 to be better evaluated in terms of both the wait time 18 and the loading status 22. This allows, in particular, that the manifest 12 can also be evaluated, for example, in terms of money. Thus, the dispatcher can determine whether to accept the manifest 12. Evaluation takes place with regard to the waiting time 18 and the loading state 22.
In particular, "full", "partial load" or "empty" may be considered as the loaded state 22.
For this purpose, for example, the scheduling personnel can also input the change costs and the fixed costs into the invoice evaluation system 10 via the input device 24. In particular, it is thus possible to determine, for example, a cost to evaluate the manifest 12 by using the waiting time 18 and by using the shipment status 22.
Preferably, several shipments 12 can be completed in one driving route 20. In other words, multiple shipments 12 may be performed using one driving route 20. To this end, the truck 14 may travel from a first destination, for example, to receive a first manifest 12, to a second destination, for example, to receive a second manifest 12. At a third location, the two shipments 12 may then, for example, be settled. In particular, it is thereby possible, for example, to detect an empty vehicle as a loaded state 22 or only a partially loaded state. Therefore, the loading/unloading time can be considered together when evaluating the manifest 12.
The corresponding times and costs occurring on a particular route 20 can therefore be taken into account by means of the manifest evaluation system 10, so that the profitability of future routes 20 can be evaluated by means of the manifest evaluation system 10.
Furthermore, the manifest evaluation system 10 allows the corresponding evaluation of the manifest 12 by the transport provider and the storage thereof, for example, in the electronic computing device 16 of the manifest evaluation system 12. They may then be listed where the highly positively rated manifest 12 has a higher score than the negatively rated manifest 12. For example, the evaluation of the client may be output. In particular, this allows the user of the manifest evaluation system 10 to evaluate the customer accordingly, so that in particular the corresponding authorization conditions can be better agreed upon.
In particular, provision may be made for the electronic computing device 16 to automatically accept the manifest 12 as a function of the evaluation of the manifest 12. In particular, historical data about the manifest 12 may be obtained for this purpose, which allows the manifest 12 to be evaluated.
Provision can also be made for the manifest evaluation system 10 to have an input device 24 and for the waiting time 18 and/or the loading state 22 to be detected by input from a user of the manifest evaluation system 10. Position information of the navigation device 26 of the truck 14 may also be used for determining the waiting time 18 and/or loading status information may be used for determining the loading status 22. In other words, it can be provided, for example, that the waiting time 18 and/or the loading state 22 are manually entered by the user. In particular, it is here historical data about the waiting times 18 and/or the loading states 22. In particular, this allows the manifest 12 or future similar manifests 12 to be reliably evaluated. Thereby providing a better manifest evaluation system 10.
In particular, goods 28 can be evaluated for this purpose with regard to their properties. The manifest 12 may be evaluated using, for example, the volume of the goods 28, the weight of the goods 28, the shape of the goods 28, or the monetary value of the goods 28, respectively.
Provision can also be made for the manifest 12 to be evaluated also as a function of the driver operating state of the driver of the truck 14 in the driving route 20. For example, the driver operating state can be determined depending on the application of the driver's mobile terminal 30. In particular, detailed information about the current operating state of the driver can be obtained thereby. In particular, it may be used for driver waiting times 18, for example before a loading dock, at a border or at other checkpoints. The mobile terminal 30 can be designed, for example, as a smartphone, a so-called smartphone. This makes it possible to evaluate the driving entrusts 12 in a cost-effective and reliable manner.
In particular, provision is made for the manifest 12 to be evaluated also as a function of the type of goods of the manifest 12 in the route 20, in other words as a function of the goods 28.
In particular, it is provided that at least the waiting time 18 and/or the loading state 22 are stored in a memory device 32 of the manifest evaluation system 10 and the manifest 12 is evaluated as a function of the stored waiting time 18 and/or the stored loading state 22. In particular, manifest 12 may therefore also be evaluated in terms of historical data associated with manifest 12. The storage device 32 may be provided in the interior of the truck, or alternatively, the storage device 32 may be provided as an external truck storage device 32 as in the present example. For example, the storage 32 can be provided in the form of a backend server or a cloud server. This allows information about the waiting time 18 and the loading state 22 to be transmitted to a back-end server, for example by means of a transmission device of the truck 14, so that the user of the manifest evaluation system 10 can directly access said information and can evaluate the manifest 12 in advance. In particular, the corresponding freight slip 12 can be evaluated reliably as a function of historical information, i.e. the stored waiting times 18 and/or the stored loading states 22. In particular, a list of the respective manifest 12 can thus be listed with regard to its profitability. Whereby a reliable evaluation of the manifest 12 can be performed.
In particular, it can be provided that the route 20 is determined by means of the manifest evaluation system 10 as a function of at least two evaluated manifests 12, in particular as a function of a plurality of evaluated manifests 12. "plurality" means in particular more than two shipments 12. In particular, the manifest evaluation system 10 then determines the optimal driving route 20 from a plurality of manifests 12. In particular, the respective waiting times 18 and the respective loading states 22 can then be taken into account when determining the route 20, so that the route 20 is better determined. In particular, the profitability of the route 20 can be better determined thereby.
It may also be provided that the waiting time 18 and/or the loading status 20 are first weighted according to the decision criterion and the manifest 12 is evaluated according to the weighted waiting time 18 and the weighted loading status 20. In other words, the wait time 18 and the shipment status 22 may be weighted differently. For example, both the waiting time 18 and the loading state 22 can be allocated a monetary value for this purpose. The values may be different from each other. For example, the loading state 22 may be weighted in a manner less than the wait time 18. In particular, then, a corresponding list with a corresponding weight, for example a monetary evaluation of the manifest 12, can be listed. Whereby a better evaluation of the manifest 12 can be performed.
In particular, the manifest evaluation system 10 may be designed to assist dispatchers. For example, weekly guidelines can be created that can determine the inefficiency or profitability of future individual driving routes 20. In particular, similar driving routes 20 or identical driving routes 20 can be used for this purpose depending on the historical data.
Provision may also be made for the manifest 12 to be evaluated, for example, with respect to its loading and unloading times. To this end, a manifest 34 may be established that assigns a grade to the corresponding manifest 12. In particular, in this case, provision can be made for the receipt of the manifest 12 to be based on the respective class. Provision can also be made for the dispatcher, for example, to be provided with a corresponding transparency by means of the input device 24, whereby the dispatcher is indicated in which region the truck 14 is currently located, for example. In addition, the goods 28 can be evaluated, for example, in terms of money, wherein here in particular the loading status 22 and the waiting time 18 are thus assigned a money value, wherein then the manifest evaluation system 10 can determine, for example, whether the manifest 12 is profitable accordingly. In particular, future driving routes 20 can therefore also be determined and evaluated by means of the manifest evaluation system 10.
In particular, the corresponding waiting times 18 and loading states 22, in particular the future waiting times 18 and the future loading states 22, along the route 20 can be made known to the dispatcher, for example, by means of the manifest evaluation system 10. Thus, the dispatcher has been able to view and correspondingly consider the planning of future driving routes 20. In the list 34, for example, it can be provided that the manifest 12 is evaluated with respect to the maximum loading time, the maximum unloading time or the maximum empty vehicle travel. Alternatively or additionally, all three evaluations may be considered together.
A summary view may also be provided by way of the manifest evaluation system 10 whereby a dispatcher or user of the manifest evaluation system 10 has a comprehensive understanding of, for example, where goods 28 are to be unloaded or loaded. Furthermore, corresponding boundary and customs regulations may also be considered in determining the driving route 20.
Thus, with the manifest evaluation system 10 of the present invention, a user or dispatcher, for example, of the manifest evaluation system 10, can simply accept or reject the corresponding manifest 12. It may also be provided that the manifest evaluation system 10 is able to automatically accept the manifest 12, for example, in accordance with a threshold for evaluation, for example, in accordance with an evaluation rating ranking of the manifest 12.
Claims (11)
1. A method for evaluating a manifest (12) for a truck (14) by means of a manifest evaluation system (10), wherein a waiting time (18) of the truck (14) is detected and a driving route (20) of the truck (14) is determined as a function of the detected waiting time (18) and the manifest (12) is evaluated in accordance therewith by means of an electronic computing device (16) of the manifest evaluation system (10),
characterized in that the loading state (22) of the truck (14) is detected during the route (20), and the manifest (12) is evaluated by means of the electronic computing device (16) also as a function of the detected loading state (22).
2. A method as claimed in claim 1, characterised in that the manifest (12) is automatically accepted by means of the electronic computing device (16) in dependence on the evaluation of the manifest (12).
3. Method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the manifest evaluation system (10) has an input device (24) and the waiting time (18) and/or the loading status (22) is detected by input of a user of the manifest evaluation system (10).
4. Method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that for determining the waiting time (18) position information of a navigation device (26) of the truck (14) and/or for determining the loading status (22) loading status information is used.
5. Method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the manifest (12) is also evaluated on the basis of the driver's operating state of the driver of the truck (14) during the driving route (20).
6. The method as claimed in claim 5, characterized in that the driver operating state is determined by means of an application of the driver's mobile terminal device (30).
7. Method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the manifest (12) is evaluated during the route (20) also in dependence on the type of goods of the manifest (12).
8. Method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that at least the waiting time (18) and/or the loading status (22) are stored in a memory device (32) of the manifest evaluation system (10) and the manifest (12) is evaluated on the basis of the stored waiting time (18) and/or the stored loading status (22).
9. Method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the route (20) is determined by means of the manifest evaluation system (10) on the basis of at least two evaluated manifests (12), in particular on the basis of a plurality of evaluated manifests (12).
10. Method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that at least the waiting time (18) and/or the loading status (22) are weighted according to a criterion and the manifest (12) is evaluated according to the weighted waiting time (18) and the weighted loading status (22).
11. An invoice evaluation system (10) for evaluating an invoice (12) for a truck (14), the invoice evaluation system (10) having an electronic computing device (16), wherein the invoice evaluation system (10) is designed for carrying out the method as claimed in one of claims 1 to 10.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| DE102019003233.0 | 2019-05-08 | ||
| DE102019003233.0A DE102019003233A1 (en) | 2019-05-08 | 2019-05-08 | Method for evaluating a freight order by means of a freight order evaluation system and also a freight order evaluation system |
| PCT/EP2020/060515 WO2020224920A1 (en) | 2019-05-08 | 2020-04-15 | Method for assessing a freight order by means of a freight order assessment system, and freight order assessment system |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN113795727A true CN113795727A (en) | 2021-12-14 |
Family
ID=70289412
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202080034169.2A Pending CN113795727A (en) | 2019-05-08 | 2020-04-15 | Method for evaluating a manifest by means of a manifest evaluation system and a manifest evaluation system |
Country Status (5)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US20220335368A1 (en) |
| EP (1) | EP3966525A1 (en) |
| CN (1) | CN113795727A (en) |
| DE (1) | DE102019003233A1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2020224920A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE102021002490A1 (en) | 2021-05-11 | 2021-07-22 | Daimler Ag | Method for generating a booking proposal for a transport task of a user of a booking management system for autonomous transport services |
| CN115330273A (en) * | 2022-10-13 | 2022-11-11 | 永立数智(北京)科技有限公司 | Credit evaluation management method and device for network freight system and electronic equipment |
Citations (11)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE19829538A1 (en) * | 1998-07-02 | 2000-01-05 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Method for influencing source data for determining a route in a navigation system |
| US20020055818A1 (en) * | 2000-07-10 | 2002-05-09 | Gaspard James G. | Method to schedule a vehicle in real-time to transport freight and passengers |
| CN1447945A (en) * | 2000-07-07 | 2003-10-08 | Gf－X业务有限公司 | Method, computer system and computer system network |
| CN104866997A (en) * | 2015-06-10 | 2015-08-26 | 南京大学 | Intelligent pairing method applied to online stowage of vehicles and goods |
| CN106447251A (en) * | 2016-08-26 | 2017-02-22 | 杭州华春科技有限公司 | Logistics transportation matching bidding payment and risk management control method and system |
| WO2018028930A1 (en) * | 2016-08-10 | 2018-02-15 | Audi Ag | Method and system for transporting transportable goods |
| CN107730068A (en) * | 2017-08-29 | 2018-02-23 | 陈飞 | The allocator of freight orders packet recombining is carried out according to cargo service evaluation result |
| CN107730161A (en) * | 2017-08-29 | 2018-02-23 | 陈飞 | The method and apparatus for decomposing restructuring order according to route and carrier information |
| CN107767013A (en) * | 2017-08-29 | 2018-03-06 | 陈飞 | A kind of foundation lorry computing with words flow package method and system |
| US20180211217A1 (en) * | 2017-01-23 | 2018-07-26 | Uber Technologies, Inc. | Systems for routing and controlling vehicles for freight |
| CN109579865A (en) * | 2019-01-04 | 2019-04-05 | 杭州卓凯科技有限公司 | Net about goods vehicle traffic route planning system and method |
Family Cites Families (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP4573907B1 (en) | 2009-11-19 | 2010-11-04 | 株式会社三愛 | Fare charge calculation method and fare charge calculation system |
| US20140324633A1 (en) | 2013-04-30 | 2014-10-30 | Freightopolis Inc. | Freight services marketplace system and methods |
| US11155263B2 (en) * | 2019-03-08 | 2021-10-26 | Uber Technologies, Inc. | Network computer system to control freight vehicle operation configurations |
-
2019
- 2019-05-08 DE DE102019003233.0A patent/DE102019003233A1/en active Pending
-
2020
- 2020-04-15 WO PCT/EP2020/060515 patent/WO2020224920A1/en unknown
- 2020-04-15 CN CN202080034169.2A patent/CN113795727A/en active Pending
- 2020-04-15 EP EP20719180.0A patent/EP3966525A1/en active Pending
- 2020-04-15 US US17/609,208 patent/US20220335368A1/en active Pending
Patent Citations (11)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE19829538A1 (en) * | 1998-07-02 | 2000-01-05 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Method for influencing source data for determining a route in a navigation system |
| CN1447945A (en) * | 2000-07-07 | 2003-10-08 | Gf－X业务有限公司 | Method, computer system and computer system network |
| US20020055818A1 (en) * | 2000-07-10 | 2002-05-09 | Gaspard James G. | Method to schedule a vehicle in real-time to transport freight and passengers |
| CN104866997A (en) * | 2015-06-10 | 2015-08-26 | 南京大学 | Intelligent pairing method applied to online stowage of vehicles and goods |
| WO2018028930A1 (en) * | 2016-08-10 | 2018-02-15 | Audi Ag | Method and system for transporting transportable goods |
| CN106447251A (en) * | 2016-08-26 | 2017-02-22 | 杭州华春科技有限公司 | Logistics transportation matching bidding payment and risk management control method and system |
| US20180211217A1 (en) * | 2017-01-23 | 2018-07-26 | Uber Technologies, Inc. | Systems for routing and controlling vehicles for freight |
| CN107730068A (en) * | 2017-08-29 | 2018-02-23 | 陈飞 | The allocator of freight orders packet recombining is carried out according to cargo service evaluation result |
| CN107730161A (en) * | 2017-08-29 | 2018-02-23 | 陈飞 | The method and apparatus for decomposing restructuring order according to route and carrier information |
| CN107767013A (en) * | 2017-08-29 | 2018-03-06 | 陈飞 | A kind of foundation lorry computing with words flow package method and system |
| CN109579865A (en) * | 2019-01-04 | 2019-04-05 | 杭州卓凯科技有限公司 | Net about goods vehicle traffic route planning system and method |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| DE102019003233A1 (en) | 2020-11-12 |
| US20220335368A1 (en) | 2022-10-20 |
| WO2020224920A1 (en) | 2020-11-12 |
| EP3966525A1 (en) | 2022-03-16 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| KR101910045B1 (en) | Real-time Sharing Method of Cargo Transportation Information through Cargo Information Sharing Community centered on Cloud Hub with Dynamic Routing and Safe Driving Requirements | |
| CN102282447A (en) | Systems and methods for freight tracking and monitoring | |
| JP2004511402A (en) | Transportation planning, execution and freight payment management programs and related methods | |
| CA3020645A1 (en) | Dynamic load matching engine methods and systems | |
| US11710095B2 (en) | Vehicle service providing apparatus and vehicle service providing method | |
| CN109740909A (en) | A kind of part load intelligent goods dispatch method and system based on freight logistics platform | |
| CN113795727A (en) | Method for evaluating a manifest by means of a manifest evaluation system and a manifest evaluation system | |
| KR101941934B1 (en) | Online intermediating apparatus for cargo transportation | |
| KR102368084B1 (en) | Transit Management System | |
| JP2007293530A (en) | Transportation fare decision method for transportation means and transportation fare decision device | |
| Bína et al. | Comparative model of unit costs of road and rail freight transport for selected European countries | |
| JP2002324117A (en) | Processing system for acceptance of delivery request for baggage and assignment of delivery operation to forwarder | |
| KR101910050B1 (en) | Real-time Sharing Method of Cargo Transportation Information through Cargo Information Sharing Community centered on Cloud Hub with State Change Adaptabiliy and Safe Driving Requirements | |
| Tinka et al. | Cashless fare collection in sub-Saharan African paratransit: A review of experiences | |
| Khalipova et al. | Development of a model for the integrated management of the international delivery chains formation | |
| JP2020181484A (en) | Matching program, matching method, and matching device | |
| WO2007041275A2 (en) | Systems and methods for freight transportation | |
| JP7431347B2 (en) | Method and management system for generating operating time key performance indicators | |
| Hoffman et al. | The use of tracking technology for improved management of trade corridors | |
| JP2023053921A (en) | Server device and program | |
| JP2005038173A (en) | Physical distribution management system, method, and program | |
| Fowkes | Freight costs | |
| JP2024047007A (en) | Calculation device, program and calculation method | |
| Muñuzuri et al. | Development of a Cost Model for Intermodal Transport in Spain | |
| Швецова et al. | THE FACTORS AFFECTING THE COST OF THE CARGO TRANSPORTATION |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| TA01 | Transfer of patent application right |
Effective date of registration: 20220512 Address after: German Leinfelden echterdingen Applicant after: Daimler trucks AG Address before: Stuttgart, Germany Applicant before: DAIMLER AG |
|
| TA01 | Transfer of patent application right |