CN113570252A - Fire risk quantitative evaluation method, system and device and readable storage medium - Google Patents
Fire risk quantitative evaluation method, system and device and readable storage medium Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN113570252A CN113570252A CN202110866455.1A CN202110866455A CN113570252A CN 113570252 A CN113570252 A CN 113570252A CN 202110866455 A CN202110866455 A CN 202110866455A CN 113570252 A CN113570252 A CN 113570252A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- safety module
- fire
- fire safety
- risk
- items
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 36
- 238000011158 quantitative evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 33
- 238000012797 qualification Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 158
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 22
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 238000005034 decoration Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000001629 suppression Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000011002 quantification Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 abstract description 8
- 238000012502 risk assessment Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 10
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000013139 quantization Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013210 evaluation model Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007792 addition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013145 classification model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000750 progressive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0635—Risk analysis of enterprise or organisation activities
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/26—Government or public services
- G06Q50/265—Personal security, identity or safety
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a fire risk quantitative evaluation method, which comprises the following steps: obtaining scoring results of all units in an essential fire safety module, a basic fire safety module and a management fire safety module of a place to be monitored; the scores of the key items and the general items are collected and calculated to respectively obtain the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module; calculating a fire risk quantitative rating score of a place to be monitored by combining the qualification rate and whether a first direct judgment item or a second direct judgment item is included to obtain the rating score; and judging the fire-fighting risk level of the place to be monitored according to the rating score and the fire-fighting risk level model. The method has the advantages of real-time performance and quantitative evaluation of fire risks, and is not possessed by various existing fire risk evaluation methods. The problem that the existing fire risk assessment cannot dynamically display the fire risk condition is solved. The problem that the conventional fire risk assessment method is relatively lagged is solved.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of big data, in particular to a fire risk quantitative evaluation method, a fire risk quantitative evaluation system, a fire risk quantitative evaluation device and a readable storage medium.
Background
With the development of science and technology, high-rise and super high-rise buildings and large industrial comprehensive buildings such as public places or office places are increasing day by day, the buildings are special in structure and diversified in interior decoration, the probability of fire of the buildings is increased due to the fact that internal external equipment is complex, and once a fire occurs, people and property are inevitably seriously lost. For these buildings, the current status and working performance of the fire-fighting facilities of the buildings need to be accurately mastered in principle, and daily maintenance and management are well done, so that multidimensional information can be more accurately collected. In the prior art, based on the multi-dimensional information, most of the multi-dimensional information is judged by unit fire-fighting risk level based on expert experience, but the multi-dimensional information has many defects, such as: the dimensionality of the collected data is not comprehensive enough; or a reasonable unit fire-fighting risk level evaluation model or a quantifiable fire-fighting risk level evaluation method is lacked, so that personal subjective factors are greatly influenced when the fire-fighting risk level evaluation is carried out on the public places or units, the accuracy standard is not enough, the reliability is not high, and a large amount of manpower, material resources and evaluation consultation and information are wasted.
How to make full use of the data that detect the accumulation promotes the detection level, realizes quick, efficient building fire prevention and fire control facility and detects, obtains audio-visual quantization result and has the important meaning to guaranteeing fire control safety.
Disclosure of Invention
Aiming at the defects in the prior art, the invention provides a fire risk quantitative evaluation method, a fire risk quantitative evaluation system, a fire risk quantitative evaluation device and a readable storage medium.
In order to solve the technical problem, the invention is solved by the following technical scheme:
a fire risk quantitative evaluation method comprises the following steps:
obtaining scoring results of all units in an intrinsic fire safety module, a basic fire safety module and a management fire safety module of a place to be monitored, wherein the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are quantized and assigned to each module, each module comprises a plurality of scoring units, all the units are classified according to attributes, and in all categories, at least direct judgment items, key items and general items are included, the direct judgment items comprise a first direct judgment item and a second direct judgment item, the key items and the general items are scored, and whether the direct judgment items are included or not is counted;
the scores of the key items and the general items are collected and calculated to respectively obtain the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module;
calculating a fire risk quantitative rating score of a place to be monitored by combining the qualification rate and whether a first direct judgment item or a second direct judgment item is included to obtain the rating score;
and judging the fire-fighting risk level of the place to be monitored according to the rating score and the fire-fighting risk level model.
As an implementation manner, the quantizing and assigning a value to each module specifically includes:
the scores of the intrinsic, basic and administrative fire safety modules are set to X, Y and Z, respectively, and X + Y + Z is 100.
As one implementable embodiment, the get rated score is: intrinsic safety module yield 100X (X/100) + basic fire safety module yield 100X (Y/100) + management fire safety module yield 100X (Z/100).
As an implementable manner, the intrinsic fire safety module comprises a fire load hazard and building structure hazard unit;
the basic fire safety module comprises a building fire protection unit, a decoration fire protection unit and a dangerous fire source control unit;
the management fire safety module comprises a fire safety responsibility system and fire system management unit, a fire patrol and fire inspection and hidden danger rectification unit, a fire facility management unit, a management unit of a fire control room, an initial fire suppression unit, a fire safety evacuation unit and a fire propaganda education training and fire emergency drilling unit;
as an implementable manner, the scoring results of the key items and the general items are respectively set as qualified, partially unqualified and completely unqualified, the qualification rate of each module is calculated based on the scoring results of the key items and the general items, the completely unqualified items are converted into partially unqualified items in the calculation, and the total conversion item number does not include the direct judgment item number, wherein the qualification rate is as follows:
wherein R represents the yield; n represents the total reduced item number of the check items; n1 represents the number of terms of the partially ineligible term after conversion; n2 represents the number of terms that are completely ineligible after conversion.
As an implementation manner, the determining the fire risk level of the to-be-monitored site according to the rating score and the fire risk level model specifically includes:
classifying the risk grades into four grades, namely low risk, medium risk, high risk and extremely high risk, wherein the medium risk comprises a first medium risk and a second medium risk;
determining the low risk when the rating score falls into a first preset score range, wherein the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module and the basic fire safety module are not lower than a first preset qualification rate and do not contain direct judgment items; or the qualification rate of the management fire safety module is not lower than the first preset qualification rate, and the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module and the basic fire safety module are not lower than the second preset qualification rate respectively and do not contain direct judgment items;
determining the rating score to be a medium risk if the rating score falls within a second preset score range, wherein the medium risk comprises a first medium risk and a second medium risk, and the medium risk belongs to the first medium risk when the qualification rates of the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are not lower than a third preset qualification rate, are not higher than the first preset qualification rate and do not contain a direct judgment item; when the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are not lower than a third preset qualification rate, are not higher than a first preset qualification rate and do not contain direct judgment items, the method belongs to a first intermediate risk; the second medium risk is met if the second preset score requirement is met, and the second medium risk is met if the second medium risk does not contain direct judgment items and does not belong to low risk, high risk and extremely high risk;
determining the rating score to be high risk if the rating score falls within a third preset score range, wherein the qualification rates of the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are not lower than the second qualification rate and not higher than the third qualification rate, or any one of the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module contains a second direct judgment item;
and determining the rating score to be in a fourth preset score range, wherein the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are all lower than the second qualification rate, or any one of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module contains a first direct judgment item.
A fire risk quantitative evaluation system comprises a data acquisition unit, a qualification rate calculation unit, a rating and scoring unit and a grade judgment unit;
the system comprises a data acquisition unit, a basic fire safety module and a management fire safety module, wherein the data acquisition unit is used for acquiring scoring results of all units in the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module of a place to be monitored, the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are quantized and assigned for each module, each module comprises a plurality of scoring units, all the units are classified according to attributes, all the categories at least comprise a direct judgment item, a key item and a general item, the direct judgment item comprises a first direct judgment item and a second direct judgment item, the key item and the general item are scored, and whether the direct judgment item is included is counted;
the qualification rate calculating unit is used for summarizing and calculating the scores of the key items and the general items to respectively obtain the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module;
the rating and scoring unit calculates a quantitative rating score of the fire risk of the place to be monitored according to the combination of the qualification rate and whether the first direct judgment item or the second direct judgment item is included, so as to obtain the rating score;
and the grade judging unit is used for judging the fire-fighting risk grade of the place to be monitored according to the rating score and the fire-fighting risk grade model.
As an implementable manner, the level judgment unit is configured to:
classifying the risk grades into four grades, namely low risk, medium risk, high risk and extremely high risk, wherein the medium risk comprises a first medium risk and a second medium risk;
determining the low risk when the rating score falls into a first preset score range, wherein the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module and the basic fire safety module are not lower than a first preset qualification rate and do not contain direct judgment items; or the qualification rate of the management fire safety module is not lower than the first preset qualification rate, and the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module and the basic fire safety module are not lower than the second preset qualification rate respectively and do not contain direct judgment items;
determining the rating score to be a medium risk if the rating score falls within a second preset score range, wherein the medium risk comprises a first medium risk and a second medium risk, and the medium risk belongs to the first medium risk when the qualification rates of the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are not lower than a third preset qualification rate, are not higher than the first preset qualification rate and do not contain a direct judgment item; when the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are not lower than a third preset qualification rate, are not higher than a first preset qualification rate and do not contain direct judgment items, the method belongs to a first intermediate risk; the second medium risk is met if the second preset score requirement is met, and the second medium risk is met if the second medium risk does not contain direct judgment items and does not belong to low risk, high risk and extremely high risk;
determining the rating score to be high risk if the rating score falls within a third preset score range, wherein the qualification rates of the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are not lower than the second qualification rate and not higher than the third qualification rate, or any one of the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module contains a second direct judgment item;
and determining the rating score to be in a fourth preset score range, wherein the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are all lower than the second qualification rate, or any one of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module contains a first direct judgment item.
A computer-readable storage medium, in which a computer program is stored which, when being executed by a processor, carries out the method steps of:
obtaining scoring results of all units in an intrinsic fire safety module, a basic fire safety module and a management fire safety module of a place to be monitored, wherein the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are quantized and assigned to each module, each module comprises a plurality of scoring units, all the units are classified according to attributes, and in all categories, at least direct judgment items, key items and general items are included, the direct judgment items comprise a first direct judgment item and a second direct judgment item, the key items and the general items are scored, and whether the direct judgment items are included or not is counted;
the scores of the key items and the general items are collected and calculated to respectively obtain the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module;
calculating a fire risk quantitative rating score of a place to be monitored by combining the qualification rate and whether a first direct judgment item or a second direct judgment item is included to obtain the rating score;
and judging the fire-fighting risk level of the place to be monitored according to the rating score and the fire-fighting risk level model.
A fire risk quantitative evaluation device, comprising a memory, a processor and a computer program stored in the memory and operable on the processor, the processor implementing the following method steps when executing the computer program:
obtaining scoring results of all units in an intrinsic fire safety module, a basic fire safety module and a management fire safety module of a place to be monitored, wherein the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are quantized and assigned to each module, each module comprises a plurality of scoring units, all the units are classified according to attributes, and in all categories, at least direct judgment items, key items and general items are included, the direct judgment items comprise a first direct judgment item and a second direct judgment item, the key items and the general items are scored, and whether the direct judgment items are included or not is counted;
the scores of the key items and the general items are collected and calculated to respectively obtain the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module;
calculating a fire risk quantitative rating score of a place to be monitored by combining the qualification rate and whether a first direct judgment item or a second direct judgment item is included to obtain the rating score;
and judging the fire-fighting risk level of the place to be monitored according to the rating score and the fire-fighting risk level model.
Due to the adoption of the technical scheme, the invention has the remarkable technical effects that:
the intelligent fire-fighting data platform is used for realizing digital quantitative evaluation on the fire-fighting safety management level of social units and the fire-fighting safety management level of regions, has the advantages of real-time performance and fire risk quantitative evaluation, and is a characteristic which is not possessed by various fire risk evaluation methods at present. The problem that the existing fire risk assessment method cannot specifically quantify the risk is solved. The problem that the existing fire risk assessment cannot dynamically display the fire risk condition is solved. The problem that the conventional fire risk assessment method is relatively lagged is solved;
the data of the invention can be derived from offline or online data, and the collected data is analyzed by using a fire risk quantitative evaluation index method, so as to quantitatively analyze whether the social unit can generate the fire and whether the fire can spread, and form a fire risk quantitative evaluation index of the social unit. The intelligent fire-fighting data platform carries out digital quantitative scoring and fire risk grade display on the fire risk of the social unit and the regional fire-fighting safety management level in real time, and is applied to the digital quantitative evaluation of the fire-fighting safety management level of the social unit and the regional fire-fighting safety management level. And data support is provided for the fire safety management of social units and the decision of regional fire safety management.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly described below, and it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and for those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained according to these drawings without creative efforts.
FIG. 1 is a schematic overall flow diagram of the process of the present invention;
fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of the overall structure of the system of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The present invention will be described in further detail with reference to examples, which are illustrative of the present invention and are not to be construed as being limited thereto.
In the prior art, the dimensionality of data collected in a place to be monitored of a fire disaster is not comprehensive enough; or a reasonable unit fire-fighting risk level evaluation model or a quantifiable fire-fighting risk level evaluation method is lacked, so that personal subjective factors are greatly influenced when the fire-fighting risk level evaluation is carried out on the public places or units, the accuracy standard is not enough, the reliability is not high, and a large amount of manpower, material resources and evaluation consultation and information are wasted.
How to make full use of the data that detect the accumulation promotes the detection level, realizes quick, efficient building fire prevention and fire control facility and detects, obtains audio-visual quantization result and has the important meaning to guaranteeing fire control safety.
Example 1:
a fire risk quantitative evaluation method is shown in figure 1 and comprises the following steps:
s100, obtaining scoring results of all units in an intrinsic fire safety module, a basic fire safety module and a management fire safety module of a place to be monitored, wherein the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are quantized and assigned to each module, each module comprises a plurality of scoring units, all the units are classified according to attributes, and all the units at least comprise a direct judgment item, a key item and a general item in all categories, wherein the direct judgment item comprises a first direct judgment item and a second direct judgment item, the key item and the general item are scored, and whether the direct judgment item is included or not is counted;
s200, summarizing and calculating the scores of the key items and the general items to respectively obtain the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module;
s300, calculating a fire risk quantitative rating score of a place to be monitored by combining the qualification rate and whether a first direct judgment item or a second direct judgment item is included to obtain the rating score;
and S400, judging the fire-fighting risk level of the place to be monitored according to the rating score and the fire-fighting risk level model.
The following table is a specific case of quantification for each module, and these scores are just one example of them, and can be exchanged for other scores, see below:
in one embodiment, the quantizing and assigning values to each module specifically includes:
the scores of the intrinsic, basic and administrative fire safety modules are set to X, Y and Z, respectively, and X + Y + Z is 100.
In one embodiment, the get rated score is: intrinsic safety module yield 100X (X/100) + basic fire safety module yield 100X (Y/100) + management fire safety module yield 100X (Z/100).
Specifically, the intrinsic fire safety module comprises a fire load danger and building structure danger unit;
the basic fire safety module comprises a building fire protection unit, a decoration fire protection unit and a dangerous fire source control unit;
the management fire safety module fire safety responsibility system and fire system unit, fire patrol and fire inspection and hidden danger rectification unit, fire facility management unit, management unit of fire control room, initial fire suppression unit, fire safety evacuation unit and fire propaganda education training and fire emergency drilling unit. For example, the fire load risk and building structure risk units may be classified into a plurality of subclasses according to their characteristics, the subclasses include direct judgment items, key items and general items, and similarly, the other units are classified as such, and are classified into direct judgment items, key items and general items according to the influence of each class on the fire risk, and are confirmed or scored according to the actual situation of the site to be monitored.
In order to enable the calculation result of the qualification rate to be more accurate, the grading results of the key items and the general items are respectively set as qualified, partially unqualified and completely unqualified, the qualification rate of each module is calculated based on the grading results of the key items and the general items, completely unqualified items are converted into partially unqualified items during calculation, the total number of the converted items does not include the number of items directly judged, and the qualification rate is as follows:
wherein R represents the yield; n represents the total reduced item number of the check items; n1 represents the number of terms of the partially ineligible term after conversion; n2 represents the number of terms that are completely ineligible after conversion.
In step S400, the determining the fire risk level of the to-be-monitored location according to the rating score and the fire risk level model specifically includes:
classifying the risk grades into four grades, namely low risk, medium risk, high risk and extremely high risk, wherein the medium risk comprises a first medium risk and a second medium risk;
determining the low risk when the rating score falls into a first preset score range, wherein the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module and the basic fire safety module are not lower than a first preset qualification rate and do not contain direct judgment items; or the qualification rate of the management fire safety module is not lower than the first preset qualification rate, and the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module and the basic fire safety module are not lower than the second preset qualification rate respectively and do not contain direct judgment items;
determining the rating score to be a medium risk if the rating score falls within a second preset score range, wherein the medium risk comprises a first medium risk and a second medium risk, and the medium risk belongs to the first medium risk when the qualification rates of the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are not lower than a third preset qualification rate, are not higher than the first preset qualification rate and do not contain a direct judgment item; when the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are not lower than a third preset qualification rate, are not higher than a first preset qualification rate and do not contain direct judgment items, the method belongs to a first intermediate risk; the second medium risk is met if the second preset score requirement is met, and the second medium risk is met if the second medium risk does not contain direct judgment items and does not belong to low risk, high risk and extremely high risk;
determining the rating score to be high risk if the rating score falls within a third preset score range, wherein the qualification rates of the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are not lower than the second qualification rate and not higher than the third qualification rate, or any one of the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module contains a second direct judgment item;
and determining the rating score to be in a fourth preset score range, wherein the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are all lower than the second qualification rate, or any one of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module contains a first direct judgment item.
The fire risk classification model may be seen in the following tables and has explicitly given a first preset score range, a second preset score range, a third preset score range and a fourth preset score range; the following data ranges can be adjusted according to the characteristics of the site to be monitored, in the following table, the first direct judgment term is denoted by a1, and the second direct judgment term is denoted by a 2;
the data of the invention can be derived from offline or online data, and the collected data is analyzed by using a fire risk quantitative evaluation index method, so as to quantitatively analyze whether the social unit can generate the fire and whether the fire can spread, and form a fire risk quantitative evaluation index of the social unit. The intelligent fire-fighting data platform carries out digital quantitative scoring and fire risk grade display on the fire risk of the social unit and the regional fire-fighting safety management level in real time, and is applied to the digital quantitative evaluation of the fire-fighting safety management level of the social unit and the regional fire-fighting safety management level. And data support is provided for the fire safety management of social units and the decision of regional fire safety management.
In addition, different risk levels are represented by different colors, so that the risk level of a place to be monitored can be intuitively known.
Example 2:
a fire risk quantitative evaluation system comprises a data acquisition unit 100, a qualification rate calculation unit 200, a rating and scoring unit 300 and a grade judgment unit 400;
the data acquisition unit 100 is configured to acquire scoring results of all units in an intrinsic fire safety module, a basic fire safety module and a management fire safety module of a place to be monitored, wherein the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are quantized and assigned to each module, each module includes a plurality of scoring units, all the units are classified according to attributes, and in all categories, at least a direct judgment item, a key item and a general item are included, the direct judgment item includes a first direct judgment item and a second direct judgment item, the key item and the general item are scored, and whether the direct judgment item is included is counted;
the qualification rate calculating unit 200 is configured to collect and calculate the scores of the key items and the general items to obtain the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module respectively;
the ranking score unit 300 calculates a quantitative ranking score of the fire risk of the place to be monitored according to the combination of the qualification rate and whether the first direct judgment item or the second direct judgment item is included, so as to obtain the ranking score;
and the grade judging unit 400 is used for judging the fire-fighting risk grade of the place to be monitored according to the rating score and the fire-fighting risk grade model.
As an implementation manner, the grade judging unit 400 is configured to:
classifying the risk grades into four grades, namely low risk, medium risk, high risk and extremely high risk, wherein the medium risk comprises a first medium risk and a second medium risk;
determining the low risk when the rating score falls into a first preset score range, wherein the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module and the basic fire safety module are not lower than a first preset qualification rate and do not contain direct judgment items; or the qualification rate of the management fire safety module is not lower than the first preset qualification rate, and the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module and the basic fire safety module are not lower than the second preset qualification rate respectively and do not contain direct judgment items;
determining the rating score to be a medium risk if the rating score falls within a second preset score range, wherein the medium risk comprises a first medium risk and a second medium risk, and the medium risk belongs to the first medium risk when the qualification rates of the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are not lower than a third preset qualification rate, are not higher than the first preset qualification rate and do not contain a direct judgment item; when the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are not lower than a third preset qualification rate, are not higher than a first preset qualification rate and do not contain direct judgment items, the method belongs to a first intermediate risk; the second medium risk is met if the second preset score requirement is met, and the second medium risk is met if the second medium risk does not contain direct judgment items and does not belong to low risk, high risk and extremely high risk;
determining the rating score to be high risk if the rating score falls within a third preset score range, wherein the qualification rates of the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are not lower than the second qualification rate and not higher than the third qualification rate, or any one of the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module contains a second direct judgment item;
and determining the rating score to be in a fourth preset score range, wherein the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are all lower than the second qualification rate, or any one of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module contains a first direct judgment item.
The data acquisition unit 100 is arranged to:
the scores of the intrinsic, basic and administrative fire safety modules are set to X, Y and Z, respectively, and X + Y + Z is 100.
The grade determination unit 400 obtains the grade scores as: intrinsic safety module yield 100X (X/100) + basic fire safety module yield 100X (Y/100) + management fire safety module yield 100X (Z/100).
The qualification rate calculation unit 200 is used for calculating the intrinsic fire safety module, and the intrinsic fire safety module comprises a fire load danger and building structure danger unit;
the basic fire safety module comprises a building fire protection unit, a decoration fire protection unit and a dangerous fire source control unit;
the management fire safety module comprises a fire safety responsibility system and fire system management unit, a fire patrol and fire inspection and hidden danger rectification unit, a fire facility management unit, a management unit of a fire control room, an initial fire suppression unit, a fire safety evacuation unit and a fire propaganda education training and fire emergency drilling unit;
in order to enable the calculation result of the qualification rate to be more accurate, the grading results of the key items and the general items are respectively set as qualified, partially unqualified and completely unqualified, the qualification rate of each module is calculated based on the grading results of the key items and the general items, completely unqualified items are converted into partially unqualified items during calculation, the total number of the converted items does not include the number of items directly judged, and the qualification rate is as follows:
wherein R represents the yield; n represents the total reduced item number of the check items; n1 represents the number of terms of the partially ineligible term after conversion; n2 represents the number of terms that are completely ineligible after conversion.
Example 3:
a computer-readable storage medium, in which a computer program is stored which, when being executed by a processor, carries out the method steps of:
obtaining scoring results of all units in an intrinsic fire safety module, a basic fire safety module and a management fire safety module of a place to be monitored, wherein the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are quantized and assigned to each module, each module comprises a plurality of scoring units, all the units are classified according to attributes, and in all categories, at least direct judgment items, key items and general items are included, the direct judgment items comprise a first direct judgment item and a second direct judgment item, the key items and the general items are scored, and whether the direct judgment items are included or not is counted;
the scores of the key items and the general items are collected and calculated to respectively obtain the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module;
calculating a fire risk quantitative rating score of a place to be monitored by combining the qualification rate and whether a first direct judgment item or a second direct judgment item is included to obtain the rating score;
and judging the fire-fighting risk level of the place to be monitored according to the rating score and the fire-fighting risk level model.
In one embodiment, when the processor executes the computer program, the quantization is implemented and the value is assigned to each module, specifically:
the scores of the intrinsic, basic and administrative fire safety modules are set to X, Y and Z, respectively, and X + Y + Z is 100.
In one embodiment, the processor, when executing the computer program, implements the get rating score as: intrinsic safety module yield 100X (X/100) + basic fire safety module yield 100X (Y/100) + management fire safety module yield 100X (Z/100).
In one embodiment, the processor, when executing the computer program, implements the intrinsic fire safety module to include a fire load risk and building structure risk element;
the basic fire safety module comprises a building fire protection unit, a decoration fire protection unit and a dangerous fire source control unit;
the management fire safety module comprises a fire safety responsibility system and fire system management unit, a fire patrol and fire inspection and hidden danger rectification unit, a fire facility management unit, a management unit of a fire control room, an initial fire suppression unit, a fire safety evacuation unit and a fire propaganda education training and fire emergency drilling unit;
in one embodiment, the processor, when executing the computer program, implements setting the scoring results of the key terms and the general terms as qualified, partially unqualified and completely unqualified, respectively, calculating the qualification rate of each module based on the scoring results of the key terms and the general terms, and converting the completely unqualified terms into partially unqualified terms in calculation, wherein the total number of the converted terms does not include the number of terms for direct judgment, and the qualification rate is:
wherein R represents the yield; n represents the total reduced item number of the check items; n1 represents the number of terms of the partially ineligible term after conversion; n2 represents the number of terms that are completely ineligible after conversion.
In one embodiment, when the processor executes the computer program, the determining of the fire risk level of the to-be-monitored site according to the rating score and the fire risk level model is implemented by:
classifying the risk grades into four grades, namely low risk, medium risk, high risk and extremely high risk, wherein the medium risk comprises a first medium risk and a second medium risk;
determining the low risk when the rating score falls into a first preset score range, wherein the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module and the basic fire safety module are not lower than a first preset qualification rate and do not contain direct judgment items; or the qualification rate of the management fire safety module is not lower than the first preset qualification rate, and the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module and the basic fire safety module are not lower than the second preset qualification rate respectively and do not contain direct judgment items;
determining the rating score to be a medium risk if the rating score falls within a second preset score range, wherein the medium risk comprises a first medium risk and a second medium risk, and the medium risk belongs to the first medium risk when the qualification rates of the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are not lower than a third preset qualification rate, are not higher than the first preset qualification rate and do not contain a direct judgment item; when the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are not lower than a third preset qualification rate, are not higher than a first preset qualification rate and do not contain direct judgment items, the method belongs to a first intermediate risk; the second medium risk is met if the second preset score requirement is met, and the second medium risk is met if the second medium risk does not contain direct judgment items and does not belong to low risk, high risk and extremely high risk;
determining the rating score to be high risk if the rating score falls within a third preset score range, wherein the qualification rates of the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are not lower than the second qualification rate and not higher than the third qualification rate, or any one of the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module contains a second direct judgment item;
and determining the rating score to be in a fourth preset score range, wherein the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are all lower than the second qualification rate, or any one of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module contains a first direct judgment item.
Example 4:
in one embodiment, the device for quantitatively evaluating the fire risk can be a server or a mobile terminal. The device for quantitatively evaluating the fire risk comprises a processor, a memory, a network interface and a database which are connected through a system bus. Wherein, the processor of the device for quantitatively evaluating the fire risk is used for providing calculation and control capability. The memory of the device for quantitatively evaluating the fire risk comprises a nonvolatile storage medium and an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system, a computer program, and a database. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of an operating system and computer programs in the non-volatile storage medium. The database is used for storing all data of the device for quantitative evaluation of fire risks. The network interface of the computer device is used for communicating with an external terminal through a network connection. The computer program is executed by a processor to implement a method for quantitative assessment of fire risk.
The embodiments in the present specification are described in a progressive manner, each embodiment focuses on differences from other embodiments, and the same and similar parts among the embodiments are referred to each other.
As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, embodiments of the present invention may be provided as a method, apparatus, or computer program product. Accordingly, the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Furthermore, the present invention may take the form of a computer program product embodied on one or more computer-usable storage media (including, but not limited to, disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, and the like) having computer-usable program code embodied therein.
The present invention has been described with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, terminal devices (systems), and computer program products according to the invention. It will be understood that each flow and/or block of the flow diagrams and/or block diagrams, and combinations of flows and/or blocks in the flow diagrams and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, embedded processor, or other programmable data processing terminal to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing terminal, create means for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing terminal to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture including instruction means which implement the function specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing terminal to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmable terminal to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable terminal provide steps for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
It should be noted that:
reference in the specification to "one embodiment" or "an embodiment" means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the invention. Thus, the appearances of the phrase "one embodiment" or "an embodiment" in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. In addition, it should be noted that the specific embodiments described in the present specification may differ in the shape of the components, the names of the components, and the like. All equivalent or simple changes of the structure, the characteristics and the principle of the invention which are described in the patent conception of the invention are included in the protection scope of the patent of the invention. Various modifications, additions and substitutions for the specific embodiments described may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the accompanying claims.
Claims (10)
1. A fire risk quantitative evaluation method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
obtaining scoring results of all units in an intrinsic fire safety module, a basic fire safety module and a management fire safety module of a place to be monitored, wherein the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are quantized and assigned to each module, each module comprises a plurality of scoring units, all the units are classified according to attributes, and in all categories, at least direct judgment items, key items and general items are included, the direct judgment items comprise a first direct judgment item and a second direct judgment item, the key items and the general items are scored, and whether the direct judgment items are included or not is counted;
the scores of the key items and the general items are collected and calculated to respectively obtain the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module;
calculating a fire risk quantitative rating score of a place to be monitored by combining the qualification rate and whether a first direct judgment item or a second direct judgment item is included to obtain the rating score;
and judging the fire-fighting risk level of the place to be monitored according to the rating score and the fire-fighting risk level model.
2. A fire risk quantitative evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein the quantification and the assignment are performed for each module, specifically:
the scores of the intrinsic, basic and administrative fire safety modules are set to X, Y and Z, respectively, and X + Y + Z is 100.
3. A fire risk quantitative evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein the obtained rating score is: intrinsic safety module yield 100X (X/100) + basic fire safety module yield 100X (Y/100) + management fire safety module yield 100X (Z/100).
4. The fire risk quantitative evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the intrinsic fire safety module comprises a fire load risk and building structure risk unit;
the basic fire safety module comprises a building fire protection unit, a decoration fire protection unit and a dangerous fire source control unit;
the management fire safety module fire safety responsibility system and fire system unit, fire patrol and fire inspection and hidden danger rectification unit, fire facility management unit, management unit of fire control room, initial fire suppression unit, fire safety evacuation unit and fire propaganda education training and fire emergency drilling unit.
5. The fire risk quantitative evaluation method according to claim 4, wherein the scoring results of the key items and the general items are set to pass, partially fail, and completely fail, respectively, the qualification rate of each module is calculated based on the scoring results of the key items and the general items, the completely fail items are converted to the partially fail items in the calculation, and the total number of the converted items does not include the number of items to be directly judged, the qualification rate being:
wherein R represents the yield; n represents the total reduced item number of the check items; n1 represents the number of terms of the partially ineligible term after conversion; n2 represents the number of terms that are completely ineligible after conversion.
6. The fire risk quantitative evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein the fire risk level of the site to be monitored is judged according to the rating score and the fire risk level model, and specifically comprises:
classifying the risk grades into four grades, namely low risk, medium risk, high risk and extremely high risk, wherein the medium risk comprises a first medium risk and a second medium risk;
determining the low risk when the rating score falls into a first preset score range, wherein the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module and the basic fire safety module are not lower than a first preset qualification rate and do not contain direct judgment items; or the qualification rate of the management fire safety module is not lower than the first preset qualification rate, and the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module and the basic fire safety module are not lower than the second preset qualification rate respectively and do not contain direct judgment items;
determining the rating score to be a medium risk if the rating score falls within a second preset score range, wherein the medium risk comprises a first medium risk and a second medium risk, and the medium risk belongs to the first medium risk when the qualification rates of the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are not lower than a third preset qualification rate, are not higher than the first preset qualification rate and do not contain a direct judgment item; when the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are not lower than a third preset qualification rate, are not higher than a first preset qualification rate and do not contain direct judgment items, the method belongs to a first intermediate risk; the second medium risk is met if the second preset score requirement is met, and the second medium risk is met if the second medium risk does not contain direct judgment items and does not belong to low risk, high risk and extremely high risk;
determining the rating score to be high risk if the rating score falls within a third preset score range, wherein the qualification rates of the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are not lower than the second qualification rate and not higher than the third qualification rate, or any one of the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module contains a second direct judgment item;
and determining the rating score to be in a fourth preset score range, wherein the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are all lower than the second qualification rate, or any one of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module contains a first direct judgment item.
7. A fire risk quantitative evaluation system is characterized by comprising a data acquisition unit, a qualification rate calculation unit, a rating and scoring unit and a grade judgment unit;
the system comprises a data acquisition unit, a basic fire safety module and a management fire safety module, wherein the data acquisition unit is used for acquiring scoring results of all units in the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module of a place to be monitored, the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are quantized and assigned for each module, each module comprises a plurality of scoring units, all the units are classified according to attributes, all the categories at least comprise a direct judgment item, a key item and a general item, the direct judgment item comprises a first direct judgment item and a second direct judgment item, the key item and the general item are scored, and whether the direct judgment item is included is counted;
the qualification rate calculating unit is used for summarizing and calculating the scores of the key items and the general items to respectively obtain the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module;
the rating and scoring unit calculates a quantitative rating score of the fire risk of the place to be monitored according to the combination of the qualification rate and whether the first direct judgment item or the second direct judgment item is included, so as to obtain the rating score;
and the grade judging unit is used for judging the fire-fighting risk grade of the place to be monitored according to the rating score and the fire-fighting risk grade model.
8. A fire risk quantitative evaluation system according to claim 7, wherein the level determination unit is configured to:
classifying the risk grades into four grades, namely low risk, medium risk, high risk and extremely high risk, wherein the medium risk comprises a first medium risk and a second medium risk;
determining the low risk when the rating score falls into a first preset score range, wherein the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module and the basic fire safety module are not lower than a first preset qualification rate and do not contain direct judgment items; or the qualification rate of the management fire safety module is not lower than the first preset qualification rate, and the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module and the basic fire safety module are not lower than the second preset qualification rate respectively and do not contain direct judgment items;
determining the rating score to be a medium risk if the rating score falls within a second preset score range, wherein the medium risk comprises a first medium risk and a second medium risk, and the medium risk belongs to the first medium risk when the qualification rates of the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are not lower than a third preset qualification rate, are not higher than the first preset qualification rate and do not contain a direct judgment item; when the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are not lower than a third preset qualification rate, are not higher than a first preset qualification rate and do not contain direct judgment items, the method belongs to a first intermediate risk; the second medium risk is met if the second preset score requirement is met, and the second medium risk is met if the second medium risk does not contain direct judgment items and does not belong to low risk, high risk and extremely high risk;
determining the rating score to be high risk if the rating score falls within a third preset score range, wherein the qualification rates of the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are not lower than the second qualification rate and not higher than the third qualification rate, or any one of the intrinsic fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module contains a second direct judgment item;
and determining the rating score to be in a fourth preset score range, wherein the qualification rates of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module are all lower than the second qualification rate, or any one of the essential fire safety module, the basic fire safety module and the management fire safety module contains a first direct judgment item.
9. A computer-readable storage medium, in which a computer program is stored which, when being executed by a processor, carries out the method steps of one of claims 1 to 6.
10. A fire risk quantitative evaluation device comprising a memory, a processor and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that the processor implements the method steps according to any one of claims 1 to 6 when executing the computer program.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110866455.1A CN113570252A (en) | 2021-07-29 | 2021-07-29 | Fire risk quantitative evaluation method, system and device and readable storage medium |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110866455.1A CN113570252A (en) | 2021-07-29 | 2021-07-29 | Fire risk quantitative evaluation method, system and device and readable storage medium |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN113570252A true CN113570252A (en) | 2021-10-29 |
Family
ID=78169170
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110866455.1A Pending CN113570252A (en) | 2021-07-29 | 2021-07-29 | Fire risk quantitative evaluation method, system and device and readable storage medium |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN113570252A (en) |
Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107909283A (en) * | 2017-11-17 | 2018-04-13 | 武汉科技大学 | A kind of Urban Fire Risk appraisal procedure based on a reference value |
| CN108805398A (en) * | 2018-04-25 | 2018-11-13 | 深圳市中电数通智慧安全科技股份有限公司 | A kind of method, device and mobile terminal of structural fire protection security evaluation |
| CN109543955A (en) * | 2018-10-26 | 2019-03-29 | 中电科新型智慧城市研究院有限公司 | Regional fire methods of risk assessment based on smart city |
| WO2019104868A1 (en) * | 2017-11-30 | 2019-06-06 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Client risk level determining method, device and equipment, and readable storage medium |
| CN111178732A (en) * | 2019-12-24 | 2020-05-19 | 武汉理工光科股份有限公司 | Regional dynamic fire risk assessment method based on big data enabling condition |
| CN112488576A (en) * | 2020-12-16 | 2021-03-12 | 思创数码科技股份有限公司 | Fire-fighting risk assessment method, system, computer equipment and readable storage medium |
-
2021
- 2021-07-29 CN CN202110866455.1A patent/CN113570252A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107909283A (en) * | 2017-11-17 | 2018-04-13 | 武汉科技大学 | A kind of Urban Fire Risk appraisal procedure based on a reference value |
| WO2019104868A1 (en) * | 2017-11-30 | 2019-06-06 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Client risk level determining method, device and equipment, and readable storage medium |
| CN108805398A (en) * | 2018-04-25 | 2018-11-13 | 深圳市中电数通智慧安全科技股份有限公司 | A kind of method, device and mobile terminal of structural fire protection security evaluation |
| CN109543955A (en) * | 2018-10-26 | 2019-03-29 | 中电科新型智慧城市研究院有限公司 | Regional fire methods of risk assessment based on smart city |
| CN111178732A (en) * | 2019-12-24 | 2020-05-19 | 武汉理工光科股份有限公司 | Regional dynamic fire risk assessment method based on big data enabling condition |
| CN112488576A (en) * | 2020-12-16 | 2021-03-12 | 思创数码科技股份有限公司 | Fire-fighting risk assessment method, system, computer equipment and readable storage medium |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| 谢天光;路世昌;郭伟;: "某城市火灾风险评估研究" * |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| WO2016082263A1 (en) | Plan-based multi-target assistant decision-making platform and implementation method thereof | |
| CN110390453B (en) | Petrochemical equipment process safety risk management system | |
| CN105825342A (en) | Pipeline failure possibility evaluation method and system | |
| CN105740992B (en) | Hospital medical risk assessment system and method | |
| US20240142063A1 (en) | Method for troubleshooting potential safety hazards of compressor in smart gas pipeline network and internet of things system thereof | |
| CN111178732A (en) | Regional dynamic fire risk assessment method based on big data enabling condition | |
| CN113010576A (en) | Method, device, equipment and storage medium for capacity evaluation of cloud computing system | |
| CN111507603A (en) | Method and system for evaluating current environmental risk situation of in-production enterprise | |
| CN112783100A (en) | Memory, chemical enterprise safety production risk early warning method, equipment and device | |
| CN114862289A (en) | Construction parameter-based safety state confirmation method and device | |
| KR20150131491A (en) | System and method for estimating fire risk using fire risk index and a medium having computer readable program for executing the method | |
| CN113505980A (en) | Reliability evaluation method, device and system for intelligent traffic management system | |
| CN111178731A (en) | Social unit dynamic fire risk assessment method based on big data enabling condition | |
| CN113570252A (en) | Fire risk quantitative evaluation method, system and device and readable storage medium | |
| CN112001511A (en) | Equipment reliability and dynamic risk evaluation method, system and equipment based on data mining | |
| CN116542518A (en) | Equipment-based power system improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model | |
| CN110796376A (en) | Work division system performance assessment management system | |
| CN113449966B (en) | Gypsum board equipment inspection method and system | |
| CN113643154B (en) | Relay protection constant value intelligent auditing system | |
| CN115619264A (en) | Aviation airborne software quality evaluation method based on software full life cycle | |
| CN114240259A (en) | Dynamic grading method, device and equipment for scaffold operation risks | |
| CN113191685A (en) | Comprehensive evaluation system for safety of construction site | |
| KR101888099B1 (en) | System and method for managing fire risk, and an recording medium having computer readable program for executing the method | |
| CN114154842A (en) | Operation guidance system and method based on real-time data analysis of power plant | |
| CN117391357B (en) | Scheduling self-checking system for power grid scheduling operation management based on big data |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |