Disclosure of Invention
In view of the problems in the prior art, the invention aims to provide an evaluation method for mixing uniformity of a cement stabilized macadam mixture, which realizes evaluation of the uniformity of the cement stabilized macadam mixture just mixed from two aspects of cement uniformity and grading uniformity through redesign of evaluation indexes in the evaluation method, but not evaluates the mixing uniformity after solidification molding, and effectively avoids the disadvantage of reprocessing caused by unqualified uniformity indexes after solidification molding.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention adopts the following technical scheme:
the invention provides an evaluation method for mixing uniformity of a cement stabilized macadam mixture, which comprises the following steps:
mixing the cement stabilized macadam mixture, and selecting at least three points at different time points in the mixing process to sample to obtain a sample;
performing EDTA titration on the sample, and determining the consumption of EDTA and the extreme difference value X of the consumption of EDTA corresponding to the cement dosage at each time point;
screening the sample to obtain the sum R of the extreme difference values of the sieve pore passing rates of the sampleXAnd the sum T of the difference values of the passing rate of each sieve pore and the standard value;
the extreme difference value X of the cement dosage and the sum R of the extreme difference values of the passing rates of all the sieve holesXAnd comparing the sum T of the difference value of each sieve pore passing rate and the standard value with a preset value, and if the sum T is matched with the preset value, the result is uniform.
According to the invention, through redesigning the evaluation method of cement mixing uniformity, selecting new evaluation indexes and calculation modes, the uniformity evaluation of the stable crushed aggregates of the just-mixed cement is realized from the two aspects of cement uniformity and grading uniformity, instead of evaluating the uniformity after solidification and molding, and the disadvantage of reprocessing caused by disqualified uniformity indexes after solidification and molding is effectively avoided.
In the present invention, the sampling at least three points at different time points during the mixing process means that at least 3 points are sampled at each time point, that is, three samples are obtained by sampling once, and the time points can be selected from 10s, 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s, 100s, 110s, 120s, 130s, 140s, 150s, 160s, 170s, 180s, 190s, 200s, 210s, 220s, 230s, 240s, 250s, 260s, 270s, 280s, 290s, 300s, 400s, 500s and the like. If the position can be the central shaft position A of the stirring blade of the machine, the middle position B of the stirring blade and the top end position C of the outer side of the stirring blade;
in the invention, EDTA standard curves are drawn according to the cement dosage of 0%, 2%, 4%, 6% and 8% respectively (namely EDTA titration and fitting are carried out on a uniformly mixed mixture containing specific cement content), so that EDTA consumption y in different cement dosages x and three particle size ranges is obtained by adopting the following EDTA standard curves;
y =2.7525x +2.2 in the particle size range 0-9.5mm
Particle size range 9.5-19mm, y =1.605x +0.84 excluding 9.5mm end point values
Particle size range 19-31.5mm, y =1.230x +0.520 excluding 19mm end point values
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the mixing method includes vibration mixing and non-vibration mixing.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the mixing time is not less than 10s, and may be, for example, 10s, 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s, 100s, 110s, 120s, 130s, 140s, 150s, 160s, 170s, 180s, 190s, 200s, 210s, 220s, 230s, 240s, 250s, 260s, 270s, 280s, 290s, or 300s, but is not limited to the above-mentioned values, and other values not listed in the above range are also applicable.
According to the preferable technical scheme, the EDTA titration is carried out on the sample, the sample is screened in three particle size ranges, then EDTA titration is carried out on the screened particle fraction products, and the consumption of EDTA and the extreme difference value X of the consumption of EDTA corresponding to the cement dose at each time point are counted.
As a preferred technical scheme of the invention, the three particle size ranges comprise less than or equal to 9.5mm and 9.5-19mm, and do not comprise 9.5mm and 19-31.5mm, but do not comprise 19 mm.
As a preferred technical scheme of the invention, the screening form comprises water washing screening.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the rotation speed of the vibratory mixing is 55 to 75r/min, for example, 55r/min, 56r/min, 57r/min, 58r/min, 59r/min, 60r/min, 61r/min, 62r/min, 63r/min, 64r/min, 65r/min, 66r/min, 67r/min, 68r/min, 69r/min, 70r/min, 71r/min, 72r/min, 73r/min, 74r/min or 75r/min, but is not limited to the above-mentioned values, and other values not mentioned in this range are also applicable.
As a preferable technical scheme of the invention, the sum R of the extreme difference values of the passing rates of the sieve holesXIs composed of
RX=(Xmax31.5-Xmin31.5)+(Xmax26.5-Xmin26.5)+(Xmax19-Xmin19)+(Xmax9.5-Xmin9.5)+(Xmax4.75-Xmin4.75)+(Xmax2.36-Xmin2.36)+(Xmax0.6-Xmin0.6)+(Xmax0.075-Xmin0.075) In the formula, Xmax0.075Is the maximum value of the passing rate of the sieve of 0.075mm in the sample, Xmin0.075Is the minimum value of the pass rate through a 0.075mm mesh in the sample.
As a preferable embodiment of the present invention, the sum of the difference values between the respective screen mesh passage rates and the standard value and the screen mesh passage rate in T is a passage rate at which the screen mesh passes through a screen mesh of 31.5mm, 26.5mm, 19mm, 9.5mm, 4.75mm, 2.36mm, 0.6mm and 0.075mm, respectively.
T in the present invention can refer to the following algorithm:
T=(A1-D1)+(A2-D2)+(A3-D3)+(A4-D4)+(A5-D5)+(A6-D6)+(A7-D7)+(A8-D8)
the standard value D in Table 1 below is the mass percentage passing through each sieve opening corresponding to the composition grading. Such as D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, D6, D7 and D8 which are respectively 100.0, 96.6, 76.7, 48.7, 31.0, 20.5, 10.3 and 4.3.
TABLE 1
As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the evaluation method includes:
mixing the cement stabilized macadam mixture, and selecting at least three points at different time points in the mixing process to sample to obtain a sample; performing EDTA titration on the sample, wherein the EDTA titration on the sample is to screen the sample in three particle size ranges, then performing EDTA titration on the screened particle fraction product, and counting the consumption of EDTA and the extreme difference value X of the consumption of EDTA corresponding to the cement dose at each time point; the three particle size ranges comprise less than or equal to 9.5mm and 9.5-19mm, and do not comprise 9.5mm and 19-31.5mm, but do not comprise 19 mm;
screening the sample to obtain the sum R of the extreme difference values of the sieve pore passing rates of the sampleXAnd the sum T of the difference values of the passing rate of each sieve pore and the standard value; the sum R of the extreme difference values of the passing rates of the sieve poresXIs = (X)max31.5-Xmin31.5)+(Xmax26.5-Xmin26.5)+(Xmax19-Xmin19)+(Xmax9.5-Xmin9.5)+(Xmax4.75-Xmin4.75)+(Xmax2.36-Xmin2.36)+(Xmax0.6-Xmin0.6)+(Xmax0.075-Xmin0.075) In the formula, Xmax0.075Is the maximum value of the passing rate of the sieve of 0.075mm in the sample, Xmin0.075Is the minimum value of the passing rate of the sieve pore of 0.075mm in the sample;
the screen mesh passing rates in T and the difference value of each screen mesh passing rate and the standard value are respectively the passing rates of the screen meshes of 31.5mm, 26.5mm, 19mm, 9.5mm, 4.75mm, 2.36mm, 0.6mm and 0.075 mm;
the extreme difference value X of the cement dosage and the sum R of the extreme difference values of the passing rates of all the sieve holesXAnd comparing the sum T of the difference value of each sieve pore passing rate and the standard value with a preset value, and if the sum T is matched with the preset value, the result is uniform.
In the invention, for the part with the size fraction less than or equal to 9.5mm, if the range of the dosage of the cement is less than or equal to 0.10%, the cement is considered to be uniformly distributed in the size fraction range, for the part with the size fraction of 9.5mm-19mm, the part with the size fraction of 9.5mm is not included, and if the range of the dosage of the cement is less than or equal to 0.20%, the cement is considered to be uniformly distributed in the size fraction range; and if the range of the extreme difference value X of the cement dosage is less than or equal to 0.25 percent for the part with the size fraction of 19mm-31.5mm and not including the part with the size of 19mm, the cement is considered to be uniformly distributed in the size fraction range.
Grading uniformity: sum of very different values of the passing rates of the sieve holes RXLess than 15 percent, and the sum T of the difference values of the passing rate of each sieve pore and the standard value is less than 30 percent, the particles in the size fraction range are uniformly distributed.
It should be noted that the criterion for determining whether the uniformity of cement and the gradation uniformity are acceptable is not limited to the numerical criterion provided by the present invention, but the logical framework of the determination is provided according to the present invention, that is, the skilled person can change the cement dosage deviation value X, the sum R of the deviation values of the passing rates of the sieve holes according to the expected valueXAnd the sum T of the difference values of the passing rates of the sieve holes and the standard value, but the sum R of the extreme difference values of the passing rates of the sieve holes cannot be obtainedXAnd the passing rate of each sieve pore is equal toThe sum T of the differences of the standard values reaches the criterion of standard at the same time.
Compared with the prior art, the invention at least has the following beneficial effects:
according to the invention, through redesigning the evaluation method of the cement mixing uniformity, selecting new evaluation indexes, sampling points and calculation modes, evaluating the uniformity of the stable crushed aggregates which are just mixed with cement from the aspects of the cement uniformity and the grading uniformity, rather than evaluating the uniformity after solidification and molding, and through comprehensively judging the uniformity of the mixed materials, the disadvantage of reprocessing caused by unqualified uniformity indexes after solidification and molding is effectively avoided.
Detailed Description
To better illustrate the invention and to facilitate the understanding of the technical solutions thereof, typical but non-limiting examples of the invention are as follows:
example 1
The embodiment provides an evaluation method for mixing uniformity of a cement stabilized macadam mixture, which comprises the following steps:
mixing the cement stabilized macadam mixture (adopting vibration mixing, the rotating speed is 55r/min, the vibration intensity is 3), and respectively selecting three sites (a central shaft position A of a mixing blade of a mixer, a middle position B of the mixing blade and a top end position C of the outer side of the mixing blade) at different time points (10 s, 30s, 50s, 80s, 120s, 160s, 200s and 300 s) in the mixing process to sample to obtain a sample;
performing EDTA titration on the sample, namely screening the sample in three particle size ranges, performing EDTA titration on the screened particle fraction product, and counting the consumption of EDTA and the extreme difference value X of the consumption of EDTA corresponding to the cement dose at each time point; the three particle size ranges comprise less than or equal to 9.5mm and 9.5-19mm, and do not comprise 9.5mm and 19-31.5mm, but do not comprise 19 mm;
drawing an EDTA standard curve (namely performing EDTA titration and fitting by adopting a uniformly mixed mixture containing specific cement content) according to the cement dosage of 0%, 2%, 4%, 6% and 8%, so as to obtain different cement dosages x and EDTA consumption y in three particle size ranges by adopting the following EDTA standard curve;
y =2.7525x +2.2 in the particle size range 0-9.5mm
Particle size range 9.5-19mm, y =1.605x +0.84 excluding 9.5mm end point values
Particle size range 19-31.5mm, y =1.230x +0.520 excluding 19mm end point values
And calculating the cement dosage and the difference value thereof in the sample by adopting the fitting curve.
The samples were water washed and sieved and the sieving results are detailed in table 6. Obtaining the sum R of the extreme difference values of the screen mesh passing rates of the samplesXAnd the sum T of the difference values of the passing rate of each sieve pore and the standard value; the sum R of the extreme difference values of the passing rates of the sieve poresXIs = (X)max31.5-Xmin31.5)+(Xmax26.5-Xmin26.5)+(Xmax19-Xmin19)+(Xmax9.5-Xmin9.5)+(Xmax4.75-Xmin4.75)+(Xmax2.36-Xmin2.36)+(Xmax0.6-Xmin0.6)+(Xmax0.075-Xmin0.075) In the formula, Xmax0.075Is the maximum value of the passing rate of the sieve of 0.075mm in the sample, Xmin0.075Is the minimum value of the passing rate of the sieve pore of 0.075mm in the sample; the difference value between each sieve aperture passing rate and the standard value and the sieve aperture passing rate in T are the passing rates of sieve apertures of 31.5mm, 26.5mm, 19mm, 9.5mm, 4.75mm, 2.36mm, 0.6mm and 0.075mm respectively;
the extreme difference value X of the cement dosage and the sum R of the extreme difference values of the passing rates of all the sieve holesXAnd comparing the sum T of the difference value of each sieve pore passing rate and the standard value with a preset value, and details are shown in tables 5 and 7.
Example 2
The embodiment provides an evaluation method for mixing uniformity of a cement stabilized macadam mixture, which comprises the following steps:
mixing the cement stabilized macadam mixture (adopting non-vibration mixing at the rotating speed of 55 r/min), and sampling at three points (a central shaft position A of a mixing blade of a mixer, a middle position B of the mixing blade and a top end position C of the outer side of the mixing blade) at different time points (10 s, 30s and 50 s) in the mixing process to obtain a sample;
performing EDTA titration on the sample, namely screening the sample in three particle size ranges, performing EDTA titration on the screened particle fraction product, and counting the consumption of EDTA and the extreme difference value X of the consumption of EDTA corresponding to the cement dose at each time point; the three particle size ranges comprise less than or equal to 9.5mm and 9.5-19mm, and do not comprise 9.5mm and 19-31.5mm, but do not comprise 19 mm;
drawing an EDTA standard curve (namely performing EDTA titration and fitting by adopting a uniformly mixed mixture containing specific cement content) according to the cement dosage of 0%, 2%, 4%, 6% and 8%, so as to obtain different cement dosages x and EDTA consumption y in three particle size ranges by adopting the following EDTA standard curve;
y =2.7525x +2.2 in the particle size range 0-9.5mm
Particle size range 9.5-19mm, y =1.605x +0.84 excluding 9.5mm end point values
Particle size range 19-31.5mm, y =1.230x +0.520 excluding 19mm end point values
And calculating the cement dosage and the difference value thereof in the sample by adopting the fitting curve.
Washing and screening the sample, and obtaining the sum R of the extreme difference values of the passing rates of all the sieve pores of the sample according to the screening results detailed in Table 6XAnd the sum T of the difference values of the passing rate of each sieve pore and the standard value; the sum R of the extreme difference values of the passing rates of the sieve poresXIs = (X)max31.5-Xmin31.5)+(Xmax26.5-Xmin26.5)+(Xmax19-Xmin19)+(Xmax9.5-Xmin9.5)+(Xmax4.75-Xmin4.75)+(Xmax2.36-Xmin2.36)+(Xmax0.6-Xmin0.6)+(Xmax0.075-Xmin0.075) In the formula, Xmax0.075Is the maximum value of the passing rate of the sieve of 0.075mm in the sample, Xmin0.075Is the minimum value of the passing rate of the sieve pore of 0.075mm in the sample; the difference value between each sieve aperture passing rate and the standard value and the sieve aperture passing rate in T are the passing rates of sieve apertures of 31.5mm, 26.5mm, 19mm, 9.5mm, 4.75mm, 2.36mm, 0.6mm and 0.075mm respectively;
the extreme difference value X of the cement dosage and the sum R of the extreme difference values of the passing rates of all the sieve holesXAnd comparing the sum T of the difference value of each sieve pore passing rate and the standard value with a preset value, and details are shown in tables 5 and 7.
The aggregate for cement stabilized macadam in the above examples was tested according to the relevant method in the road engineering aggregate test protocol. Screening tests of single grain size of coarse and fine aggregates, crushing value, needle-like particle content, dust content and the like were carried out, as shown in tables 2 and 3, PC325 cement for cement stabilized macadam (delayed coagulation) was selected, and examined according to the relevant method in Highway engineering cement and cement concrete test protocols (JTGE30-2005) as shown in Table 4.
TABLE 2
TABLE 3
TABLE 4
TABLE 5
TABLE 6
TABLE 7
From the above results, it can be seen that: for the part with the size fraction less than or equal to 9.5mm, if the extreme difference value X of the cement dosage is less than or equal to 0.10 percent, the cement is considered to be uniformly distributed in the size fraction range; combining the results of examples 1 and 2, it can be seen that the standard of example 1 is reached after 50s of stirring, while example 2 is not reached;
for the size fraction of 9.5mm-19mm, excluding the 9.5mm part, if the extreme difference value X of the cement dosage is less than or equal to 0.20%, the cement distribution in the size fraction range is considered to be uniform; combining the results of examples 1 and 2, it can be seen that the standard of example 1 is reached after 50s of stirring, while example 2 is not reached;
for the part with the size fraction of 19mm-31.5mm and not including the part with the size fraction of 19mm, if the extreme difference value X of the cement dosage is less than or equal to 0.25 percent, the cement is considered to be uniformly distributed in the size fraction range; the results of examples 1 and 2 show that the standard of example 1 was reached after 50 seconds of stirring, while example 2 did not reach the standard.
Sum of very different values of the passing rates of the sieve holes RXLess than 15 percent, and the sum T of the difference values of the passing rate of each sieve pore and the standard value is less than 30 percent, then the particles are uniformly distributed in the size fraction range; from the analysis of the results of examples 1 and 2, it was found that only 50 seconds of stirring in example 1 reached a satisfactory value.
According to the embodiment, the evaluation method for the cement mixing uniformity is redesigned, and the new evaluation index and calculation mode are selected, so that the uniformity of the stable crushed aggregates which are just mixed with cement is evaluated from the two aspects of the cement uniformity and the grading uniformity, but the uniformity is not evaluated after solidification and forming, and the disadvantage of reprocessing caused by unqualified uniformity index after solidification and forming is effectively avoided.
The applicant declares that the present invention illustrates the detailed structural features of the present invention through the above embodiments, but the present invention is not limited to the above detailed structural features, that is, it does not mean that the present invention must be implemented depending on the above detailed structural features. It should be understood by those skilled in the art that any modifications of the present invention, equivalent substitutions of selected components of the present invention, additions of auxiliary components, selection of specific modes, etc., are within the scope and disclosure of the present invention.
The preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail, however, the present invention is not limited to the specific details of the above embodiments, and various simple modifications may be made to the technical solution of the present invention within the technical idea of the present invention, and these simple modifications are within the protective scope of the present invention.
It should be noted that the various technical features described in the above embodiments can be combined in any suitable manner without contradiction, and the invention is not described in any way for the possible combinations in order to avoid unnecessary repetition.
In addition, any combination of the various embodiments of the present invention is also possible, and the same should be considered as the disclosure of the present invention as long as it does not depart from the spirit of the present invention.