CN113533042B - Comprehensive index calculation method for representing rock stress and fracture and application - Google Patents

Comprehensive index calculation method for representing rock stress and fracture and application Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN113533042B
CN113533042B CN202110770521.5A CN202110770521A CN113533042B CN 113533042 B CN113533042 B CN 113533042B CN 202110770521 A CN202110770521 A CN 202110770521A CN 113533042 B CN113533042 B CN 113533042B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
stress
vector
shear
rock
tensile
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN202110770521.5A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN113533042A (en
Inventor
付建新
宋卫东
汪杰
李杨
曹帅
谭玉叶
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
University of Science and Technology Beijing USTB
Original Assignee
University of Science and Technology Beijing USTB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by University of Science and Technology Beijing USTB filed Critical University of Science and Technology Beijing USTB
Priority to CN202110770521.5A priority Critical patent/CN113533042B/en
Publication of CN113533042A publication Critical patent/CN113533042A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN113533042B publication Critical patent/CN113533042B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N3/00Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
    • G01N3/08Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress by applying steady tensile or compressive forces
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N3/00Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
    • G01N3/24Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress by applying steady shearing forces
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/10Complex mathematical operations
    • G06F17/11Complex mathematical operations for solving equations, e.g. nonlinear equations, general mathematical optimization problems
    • G06F17/12Simultaneous equations, e.g. systems of linear equations

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Computational Mathematics (AREA)
  • Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
  • Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
  • Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Algebra (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)

Abstract

The invention provides a comprehensive index calculation method for representing rock stress and fracture and application thereof, belonging to the technical field of rock stress and fracture evaluation. When the index is calculated, firstly, a pull-shear force vector T is determined, then, pull-shear force vector decomposition is carried out, then, each component of each pull-shear force in a three-dimensional space is determined, and finally, the pull-shear force index is obtained through coordinate conversion. The index combines with the current commonly used rock-soil analysis software, adopts a programming language FISH built in the software to compile the calculation process of the tension and shear index into a resolving program which can be called by the software, and realizes the visualization of the index by utilizing the ZoneExtra function. The method can comprehensively reflect the stress magnitude, the direction, the fracture position and the damage degree of the rock, is more consistent with the actual engineering, and can realize the visualization of the tension and shear index and intuitively and comprehensively reflect the stable state of the surrounding rock by combining with the currently common FLAC and 3DEC numerical simulation software.

Description

Comprehensive index calculation method for representing rock stress and fracture and application
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of rock stress and fracture evaluation, in particular to a comprehensive index calculation method for representing rock stress and fracture and application thereof.
Background
Rock engineering is any work that is performed inside or on the surface of a rock mass. The main engineering activities of human beings, such as tunnel engineering, mining engineering, subway engineering, hydraulic engineering and the like, all belong to rock engineering. Because the object of engineering activity is the rock mass, the stability of the surrounding rock directly determines the safety of the engineering. The method can be used for accurately evaluating the stable state of the surrounding rock, and is an important basis for supporting the surrounding rock and reinforcing an engineering structure.
The existing method for evaluating the stability of the surrounding rock mainly comprises field monitoring, surrounding rock quality grading, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, numerical simulation and the like. The numerical simulation has the advantages of flexibility, high repeatability, accuracy and the like, and gradually becomes one of the main means for evaluating the stability of the current rock engineering along with the improvement of the computer capability. When adopting numerical simulation to carry out surrounding rock stability analysis, adopt indexes such as stress, displacement and plastic zone usually, but above-mentioned index is mutually independent, need synthesize the contrast with above-mentioned index usually, just can carry out more accurate judgement to surrounding rock stability, improved the analysis degree of difficulty, consequently need a new index urgently, can synthesize the stress, damage and the state of rupture of reaction rock, improve stability analysis work's efficiency and precision.
In the existing method, a dynamic evaluation method for stability of surrounding rock based on BQ and numerical simulation provides a dynamic evaluation method for stability integrating BQ and numerical simulation, but the method needs to combine a plurality of indexes and is complex to apply. A numerical simulation method for deformation of multi-block surrounding rock of an underground factory building is provided, and advantages of discontinuous deformation and a finite element method are effectively combined, but evaluation indexes of the surrounding rock can only reflect one state of the surrounding rock. A surrounding rock damage risk numerical simulation evaluation method based on the Mohr-Coulomb criterion provides a surrounding rock damage risk numerical simulation evaluation method based on the Mohr-Coulomb criterion, and has the advantage of strong operability, but the stress and damage state of the surrounding rock cannot be intuitively displayed.
Therefore, the current numerical simulation surrounding rock index can only reflect the single state of the surrounding rock and can not visually display the stable state of the surrounding rock; the plastic zone index cannot accurately and effectively reflect the damage degree of the surrounding rock in the actual engineering.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a comprehensive index calculation method for representing rock stress and fracture and application thereof.
The surrounding rock is a typical hard and brittle material, the tensile strength and the shear strength are far less than the compressive strength, and a large number of indoor tests and engineering cases show that a plastic zone formed by mining or excavation is mostly positioned in a tensile stress zone and is in tensile or tensile-shear yield. Based on the fact that the destruction of surrounding rocks is usually caused by internal pores and gaps and is usually caused by tensile and shear stress, the invention provides a tensile and shear force index for representing the stress and fracture distribution in the rocks.
The index calculation method is as follows:
(1) determining a tensile shear vector T:
under the action of three-dimensional stress, the actual stress of the internal rock mass microcell is decomposed into 6 independent stress components which are respectively sigmaxx、σyy、σzz、τxy、τxzAnd τyzThe pull and shear vector T is calculated as follows:
T=F/A
wherein F is a tensile and shearing force vector on a crack surface, T is a tensile and shearing force vector on a unit area, and A is the area of the crack surface;
(2) and (3) decomposing a tensile and shearing force vector:
and decomposing T into components in two directions of a vertical crack surface and a parallel crack surface, namely a normal vector n and a tangential vector s, wherein the normal stress sigma and the tangential stress tau of the crack surface are respectively as follows:
σ=T·n,τ=T·s
the normal stress sigma and the tangential stress tau in the above formula are scalar quantities on the fracture surface. For the relationship between the tensile and shear force vectors and the full stress tensor, the following is given:
T=δ·n
wherein δ is the full stress tensor in three-dimensional space;
substituting the above formula into a crack surface normal stress and tangential stress scalar calculation formula to obtain:
σ=n·δ·n,τ=s·δ·n
using the tensor representation, we can obtain:
σ=σijninj,τ=σijsinj
wherein the indices i and j represent coordinate systems x, y, z;
(3) determining each component of the three-dimensional space in the pulling and shearing force:
Figure GDA0003470292010000031
wherein σxxIs normal stress in the x direction, τxyFor xoy plane shear stress, τxzIs xoz plane shear stress, tauyxIs yox plane shear stress, andxyin contrast, σyyIs normal stress in the y direction, τyzShear stress in the yoz plane, τzxIs zox plane shear stress, andxzin contrast, τzyIs zoy plane shear stress, andyzin contrast, σzzIs normal stress in the z direction, nxIs a vector in the x direction, nyIs a y-direction vector, nzIs a vector in the z direction, TxIs a tensile shear vector in the x direction, TyIs a y-direction pull shear vector, TzIs the z-direction pull shear vector.
(4) And (3) coordinate conversion to obtain a tensile and shearing force index:
F=∫TdA=∫δ·n dA
the magnitude of the tensile and shearing force F represents the resultant force of the stress borne on the surrounding rock fracture surface, and the larger the resultant force is, the more easily the fracture surface expands to cause the surrounding rock to be damaged, so that the tensile and shearing force can also reflect the stability degree of the surrounding rock.
Wherein, in the step (3), the crack surface is firstly put in the whole rock unit to obtain
Figure GDA0003470292010000032
Where cos θ and sin θ are unit components perpendicular to the plane of the crackI.e. n ═ (cos θ, sin θ), i.e. nx=cosθ,nySin θ, θ is the angle between the fracture plane and the x-axis, and the above formula is:
Figure GDA0003470292010000033
and expanding the two-dimensional plane form into a three-dimensional space to obtain the following three-dimensional space:
Figure GDA0003470292010000034
when the index is specifically applied, the method comprises the following steps: combining with the currently common geotechnical analysis software, programming a computing process of the pull-shear index into a resolving program which can be called by the software by using a programming language FISH (software in-software), and realizing the visualization of the index by using a Zone Extra function, which specifically comprises the following steps:
reading and storing stress values of all units in surrounding rock before mining, including sigmaxx、σyy、σzz、τxy、τxzAnd τyz
Calling a resolving program to resolve the tensile and shearing force indexes;
and thirdly, calling a Zone Extra program to output a pulling and shearing force distribution diagram.
The technical scheme of the invention has the following beneficial effects:
in the scheme, the stress size, the direction, the fracture position and the damage degree of the rock can be comprehensively reflected, the stress is more consistent with the actual engineering, the pulling and shearing force index can be visualized by combining with the currently common FLAC and 3DEC numerical simulation software, and the stable state of the surrounding rock can be intuitively and comprehensively reflected.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of stress of a rock mass unit involved in the comprehensive index calculation method for representing rock stress and fracture;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of stress of a rock mass fracture surface in the comprehensive index calculation method for representing rock stress and fracture;
FIG. 3 is a schematic view of the rock mass crack surface micro stress in the comprehensive index calculation method for characterizing rock stress and cracking of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of macroscopic stress of a rock mass crack surface in the comprehensive index calculation method for representing rock stress and cracking;
FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram showing the effect of the comprehensive indicator for characterizing rock stress and fracture in applying the time-shear indicator;
FIG. 6 is a numerical model with no joints added according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 7 is a numerical model with joints added according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 8 is a graph showing the overlay of the tensile and shear strength index and the plastic region without joints added in the embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 9 is a graph showing the tensile and shear strength index and the plastic area after the joint is added in the embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 10 is a graph comparing the tensile and shear strength index to the plastic region in an example of the invention.
Detailed Description
In order to make the technical problems, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention more apparent, the following detailed description is given with reference to the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments.
The invention provides a comprehensive index calculation method for representing rock stress and fracture and application thereof.
The index calculation process is as follows:
(1) determining a tensile shear vector T:
under the action of three-dimensional stress, the actual stress of the internal rock mass microcell is decomposed into 6 independent stress components which are respectively sigmaxx、σyy、σzz、τxy、τxzAnd τyzThe pull and shear vector T is calculated as follows:
T=F/A
wherein F is a tensile and shearing force vector on a crack surface, T is a tensile and shearing force vector on a unit area, and A is the area of the crack surface;
(2) and (3) decomposing a tensile and shearing force vector:
and decomposing T into components in two directions of a vertical crack surface and a parallel crack surface, namely a normal vector n and a tangential vector s, wherein the normal stress sigma and the tangential stress tau of the crack surface are respectively as follows:
σ=T·n,τ=T·s
the normal stress sigma and the tangential stress tau in the above formula are scalar quantities on the fracture surface. For the relationship between the tensile and shear force vectors and the full stress tensor, the following is given:
T=δ·n
wherein δ is the full stress tensor in three-dimensional space;
substituting the above formula into a crack surface normal stress and tangential stress scalar calculation formula to obtain:
σ=n·δ·n,τ=s·δ·n
using the tensor representation, we can obtain:
σ=σijninj,τ=σijsinj
(3) determining each component of the three-dimensional space in the pulling and shearing force:
Figure GDA0003470292010000051
wherein σxxIs normal stress in the x direction, τxyFor xoy plane shear stress, τxzIs xoz plane shear stress, tauyxIs yox plane shear stress, andxyin contrast, σyyIs normal stress in the y direction, τyzShear stress in the yoz plane, τzxIs zox plane shear stress, andxzin contrast, τzyIs zoy plane shear stress, andyzin contrast, σzzIs normal stress in the z direction, nxIs a vector in the x direction, nyIs a y-direction vector, nzIs a vector in the z direction, TxIs a tensile shear vector in the x direction, TyIs a y-direction pull shear vector, TzIs the z-direction pull shear vector.
(4) And (3) coordinate conversion to obtain a tensile and shearing force index:
F=∫TdA=∫δ·n dA
the magnitude of the tensile and shearing force F represents the resultant force of the stress borne on the surrounding rock fracture surface, and the larger the resultant force is, the more easily the fracture surface expands to cause the surrounding rock to be damaged, so that the tensile and shearing force can also reflect the stability degree of the surrounding rock.
The specific principle and process are as follows:
in general, when the rock body is under three-dimensional stress, the force applied to the inner micro-unit is shown in figure 1. As can be seen from fig. 1, the actual stress of the internal rock mass microcells under the three-dimensional stress can be decomposed into 9 stress components, but actually, there are only 6 independent components, which are σxx、σyy、σzz、τxy、τxzAnd τyz. The micro-fractures within the rock are much larger than the overall rock size, so the fracture of the internal micro-fractures is actually a planar problem. Under the action of the stress, tensile-shear stress is generated on the microcrack surface in the rock body, and the tensile-shear stress can be actually equivalent to the tensile-shear stress on the microcrack surface, and the stress schematic diagram is shown in fig. 2.
In fig. 2, T is a tensile shear vector (traction vector), which can be simply expressed as a ratio of force on the contact surface to the contact surface area, that is:
t ═ F/A formula (1)
Where F is a tensile-shear vector at the fracture surface, T is a tensile-shear vector per unit area, and A is the fracture surface area.
From this, it can be seen that the tensile-shear vector T is the same as the unit of stress, but is actually a simple vector, not a stress tensor.
Further, T is decomposed into components in both the vertical and parallel fracture planes, i.e., normal vector n and tangential vector s, as shown in fig. 3.
In fig. 3, σ is the normal stress of the fracture surface, τ is the tangential stress, and can be expressed by equation 2:
σ ═ T · n, τ ═ T · s formula (2)
It should be noted that because of the vector dot product calculation method, σ and τ are not all tensor values, but two independent components of the full stress tensor, and a scalar is not a tensor. In addition, in three-dimensional space, there are virtually an infinite number of s-vectors parallel to the fracture surface, each with a different component in or out of the fracture cross-section, so that during analysis, one should be assigned to be parallel to the fracture cross-section and the other perpendicular to the fracture cross-section.
Based on the above analysis, the stress diagram when the fracture surface is placed in the whole rock unit is shown in fig. 4. From the stress balance we can get:
Figure GDA0003470292010000061
where cos θ and sin θ are unit components perpendicular to the fracture plane, that is, n is (cos θ, sin θ), that is, n isx=cosθ,nySin θ, θ is the angle between the fracture plane and the x-axis, and can be obtained by substituting the formula:
Figure GDA0003470292010000071
the above equation can be expressed in vector form as:
t ═ δ · n or Ti=σijnjFormula (5)
The above formula is in a two-dimensional plane, and in a three-dimensional space, each component of each pulling and shearing force is as follows:
Figure GDA0003470292010000072
by substituting formula (5) for formula (2), the normal stress and the tangential stress of the crack surface can be respectively:
σ n δ n, τ s δ n, and τ n are represented by formula (7)
Expressing in tensor form:
σ=σijninj,τ=σijsinjformula (8)
To sum up, the tensile and shear force vectors on the fracture surface are:
F=∫TdA=∫δ·n dA
through the above calculation, the tensile and shearing force index of the fracture surface is obtained.
From the above analysis, it can be seen that the tensile shear force is actually the most direct factor causing the rock unit to be damaged, and the size of the tensile shear force directly determines the stability of the surrounding rock.
The application of the index in numerical simulation is as follows:
by combining with the current common geotechnical analysis software such as FLAC, 3DEC and the like, the computing process is compiled into a resolving program which can be called by the software by adopting a programming language FISH arranged in the software, and the visualization of the index is realized by utilizing the Zone Extra function.
Reading and storing stress values of all units in surrounding rock before mining, including sigmaxx、σyy、σzz、τxy、τxzAnd τyz
Calling a resolving program to resolve the tensile and shearing force indexes;
and thirdly, calling a Zone Extra program to output a pull-shear distribution cloud picture.
The display effect of the index in the software is shown in fig. 5.
The diameter of the circle in the figure represents the size of the tensile and shearing force index, the arrow represents the direction of the tensile and shearing force index, and the starting point of the arrow is the central position of the rock fracture surface.
The following description is given with reference to specific examples.
The thickness of a gold ore body is 1.2m, the inclination angle is 75 degrees, joint cracks are distributed in the ore area, backward stoping is carried out along the trend of the ore body by adopting a medium-length hole subsequent barren rock filling method, a goaf with the length of about 60m is formed, and the stability analysis of the goaf is carried out by adopting 3DEC discrete unit method software. The established numerical calculation model is shown in the figure, and the physical and mechanical parameters of the model ore rock are shown in the table 1.
TABLE 1 parameters of physical mechanics
Figure GDA0003470292010000081
The numerical calculation results of the non-added joints and the added joints are shown in fig. 6 and 7, respectively. The overlay of the tensile and shear strength index and the plastic region without joints is shown in fig. 8, irregular color blocks are plastic regions, and circles are the tensile and shear strength indexes.
As can be seen from fig. 8, the tensile and shearing force index provided by the invention is greatly overlapped with the plastic zone index of the software, the more the area of the plastic zone of the surrounding rock is, the denser the circle representing the tensile and shearing force index is, which means that the index can effectively represent the fracture condition of the surrounding rock of the goaf, and in addition, the magnitude of the stress of the area can be obtained according to the magnitude of the circle, the maximum tensile stress at the top plate is about 1.2MPa, and the maximum shearing stress at the bottom plate is about 1.5 MPa. The direction of the inner arrow of the circle shows that the maximum pulling shear index of the top plate is obliquely upward, and the maximum pulling shear index of the bottom plate is obliquely downward.
As shown in fig. 9, which is a drawing and shearing index distribution and a plasticity zone overlay chart after the joint is added, as can be seen from fig. 9, after the joint is added, the density of the drawing and shearing index is obviously increased, which is consistent with the actual result, and the plasticity zone area has no obvious change, so that the drawing and shearing index provided by the invention is more consistent with the engineering practice. According to the size of the circle of the tensile and shearing force index, the maximum tensile stress at the top plate reaches 2.1MPa, and is greatly increased compared with the maximum tensile stress without adding joints, the shear stress at the bottom plate is slightly reduced to 1.47MPa, and meanwhile, according to the distribution of the tensile and shearing force index, the large tensile and shearing force is generated at the joint of about 10m in the upper disc, and attention is paid.
The comparison curve of the upper and lower disc pull shear indexes and the plastic zone size is shown in FIG. 10. It can be seen from the figure that if the stability of the upper wall is better than that of the lower wall only according to the volume comparison of the plastic zone, in the actual engineering, the damage degree of the surrounding rock of the upper wall is often greater than that of the lower wall, and the pulling and shearing indexes reflect the phenomenon.
While the foregoing is directed to the preferred embodiment of the present invention, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.

Claims (4)

1. A comprehensive index calculation method for representing rock stress and fracture is characterized by comprising the following steps: the method comprises the following steps:
(1) determining a tensile shear vector T:
under the action of three-dimensional stress, the actual stress of the internal rock mass microcell is decomposed into 6 independent stress components which are respectively sigmaxx、σyy、σzz、τxy、τxzAnd τyzThe pull and shear vector T is calculated as follows:
T=F/A
wherein F is a tensile and shearing force vector on a crack surface, T is a tensile and shearing force vector on a unit area, and A is the area of the crack surface;
(2) and (3) decomposing a tensile and shearing force vector:
and decomposing T into components in two directions of a vertical crack surface and a parallel crack surface, namely a normal vector n and a tangential vector s, wherein the normal stress sigma and the tangential stress tau of the crack surface are respectively as follows:
σ=T·n,τ=T·s
the normal stress σ and the tangential stress τ in the above formula are scalar quantities on the fracture surface, and the relation between the tensile and shearing force vector and the full stress tensor is:
T=δ·n
wherein δ is the full stress tensor in three-dimensional space;
substituting the above formula into a crack surface normal stress and tangential stress scalar calculation formula to obtain:
σ=n·δ·n,τ=s·δ·n
using the tensor representation, we can obtain:
σ=σijninj,τ=σijsinj
wherein the indices i and j represent coordinate systems x, y, z;
(3) determining each component of the three-dimensional space in the pulling and shearing force:
Figure FDA0003470292000000011
wherein σxxIs normal stress in the x direction, τxyFor xoy plane shear stress, τxzIs xoz plane shear stress, tauyxIs yox plane shear stress, andxyin contrast, σyyIs normal stress in the y direction, τyzShear stress in the yoz plane, τzxIs zox plane shear stress, andxzin contrast, τzyIs zoy plane shear stress, andyzin contrast, σzzIs normal stress in the z direction, nxIs a vector in the x direction, nyIs a y-direction vector, nzIs a vector in the z direction, TxIs a tensile shear vector in the x direction, TyIs a y-direction pull shear vector, TzA z-direction pull shear vector;
(4) and (3) coordinate conversion to obtain a tensile and shearing force index:
F=∫TdA=∫δ·n dA
the magnitude of the tensile and shearing force F represents the resultant force of stress borne on the surrounding rock fracture surface, and the larger the resultant force is, the more easily the fracture surface expands to cause the surrounding rock to be damaged, so that the tensile and shearing force reflects the stability degree of the surrounding rock.
2. The method for calculating a comprehensive index for characterizing rock stress and fracture as claimed in claim 1, wherein: in the step (3), firstly, the crack surface is placed in the whole rock unit to obtain
Figure FDA0003470292000000021
Where cos θ and sin θ are unit components perpendicular to the fracture plane, i.e., n is (cos θ, sin θ), i.e., nx=cosθ,nySin θ, θ is the angle between the fracture plane and the x-axis, and the above formula is:
Figure FDA0003470292000000022
and expanding the two-dimensional plane form into a three-dimensional space to obtain the following three-dimensional space:
Figure FDA0003470292000000023
3. use of a composite indicator for characterising rock stress and cracking according to claim 1, characterized in that: combining with the current common geotechnical analysis software, programming language FISH built in the software is adopted to compile the calculation process of the tension and shear index into a resolving program which can be called by the software, and the visualization of the index is realized by utilizing the Zone Extra function.
4. Use of a composite indicator for characterising rock stress and cracking according to claim 3, characterized in that: the method specifically comprises the following steps:
reading and storing stress values of all units in surrounding rock before mining, including sigmaxx、σyy、σzz、τxy、τxzAnd τyz
Calling a resolving program to resolve the tensile and shearing force indexes;
and thirdly, calling a Zone Extra program to output a pulling and shearing force distribution diagram.
CN202110770521.5A 2021-07-07 2021-07-07 Comprehensive index calculation method for representing rock stress and fracture and application Active CN113533042B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110770521.5A CN113533042B (en) 2021-07-07 2021-07-07 Comprehensive index calculation method for representing rock stress and fracture and application

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110770521.5A CN113533042B (en) 2021-07-07 2021-07-07 Comprehensive index calculation method for representing rock stress and fracture and application

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN113533042A CN113533042A (en) 2021-10-22
CN113533042B true CN113533042B (en) 2022-04-05

Family

ID=78098018

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202110770521.5A Active CN113533042B (en) 2021-07-07 2021-07-07 Comprehensive index calculation method for representing rock stress and fracture and application

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN113533042B (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114324002B (en) * 2021-11-19 2022-06-21 中煤科工能源科技发展有限公司 Method for determining rock fracture occurrence and development degree in complex stress state

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105160138A (en) * 2015-10-12 2015-12-16 中铁建大桥工程局集团第一工程有限公司 Channel flow solid coupling stability analysis method
CN107990876A (en) * 2017-11-20 2018-05-04 北京科技大学 The quick scanning means in underground mine goaf and method based on unmanned vehicle
CN109446694A (en) * 2018-11-08 2019-03-08 中国石油大学(华东) The geometry damage Mechanical Analysis method of rocks crack sample mechanical characteristic
CN110220789A (en) * 2019-07-10 2019-09-10 桂林理工大学 Test specimen and tensile-sbear strength test method are tested for external crack sillar tensile-sbear strength
CN110348125A (en) * 2019-07-12 2019-10-18 西安科技大学 A kind of visualization method of discrimination of block stability
CN111980667A (en) * 2020-09-17 2020-11-24 西南石油大学 Quantitative evaluation method for influences of anisotropy on shale borehole wall collapse pressure
CN112344877A (en) * 2020-11-11 2021-02-09 东北大学 Device and method for measuring three-dimensional morphology parameters of large rock mass structural plane by unmanned aerial vehicle

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR3023954B1 (en) * 2014-07-15 2018-04-27 Services Petroliers Schlumberger METHOD FOR INVERTING THE ACTIVITY OF A FAILED AND THE TECTONIC CONSTRAINT
CN109063257B (en) * 2018-07-02 2019-04-26 山东科技大学 A kind of coal and rock subregion water filling seepage flow-damage-stress coupling method for numerical simulation
CN110031307B (en) * 2019-05-07 2020-10-30 武汉大学 Method for determining crack initiation stress index of damaged rock
CN111007231B (en) * 2019-12-23 2022-04-15 鞍钢集团矿业有限公司 Quantification method for dimensions of new shear cracks in mining rock mass

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105160138A (en) * 2015-10-12 2015-12-16 中铁建大桥工程局集团第一工程有限公司 Channel flow solid coupling stability analysis method
CN107990876A (en) * 2017-11-20 2018-05-04 北京科技大学 The quick scanning means in underground mine goaf and method based on unmanned vehicle
CN109446694A (en) * 2018-11-08 2019-03-08 中国石油大学(华东) The geometry damage Mechanical Analysis method of rocks crack sample mechanical characteristic
CN110220789A (en) * 2019-07-10 2019-09-10 桂林理工大学 Test specimen and tensile-sbear strength test method are tested for external crack sillar tensile-sbear strength
CN110348125A (en) * 2019-07-12 2019-10-18 西安科技大学 A kind of visualization method of discrimination of block stability
CN111980667A (en) * 2020-09-17 2020-11-24 西南石油大学 Quantitative evaluation method for influences of anisotropy on shale borehole wall collapse pressure
CN112344877A (en) * 2020-11-11 2021-02-09 东北大学 Device and method for measuring three-dimensional morphology parameters of large rock mass structural plane by unmanned aerial vehicle

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Mechanical properties, damage evolution, and constitutive model of rock-encased backfill under uniaxial compression;Jie Wang;《Construction and Building Materials》;20210311;1-18 *
一种基于拉-剪破坏的边坡动力稳定性分析方法;彭雪峰;《哈尔滨工业大学学报》;20200228;51-58 *
单裂隙岩石力学特性的单轴加载速率效应及破裂细观机理研究;王煜;《矿业研究与开发》;20200831;66-74 *
考虑张拉-剪切渐进破坏的边坡矢量和法研究;王伟;《岩土力学》;20190731;468-476 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN113533042A (en) 2021-10-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Shreedharan et al. Discontinuum–equivalent continuum analysis of the stability of tunnels in a deep coal mine using the distinct element method
Li et al. Experimental and numerical investigations on mechanical property and reinforcement effect of bolted jointed rock mass
Nie et al. Development of rock bolt elements in two-dimensional discontinuous deformation analysis
CN109975119B (en) Rock double-shaft compression blasting design method
CN109684785A (en) A kind of deep high stress tunnel country rock dynamic damage failure evolvement method and system
Pirvics Two dimensional displacement-stress distributions in adhesive bonded composite structures
Chore et al. Building frame-pile foundation-soil interaction analysis: a parametric study
CN113533042B (en) Comprehensive index calculation method for representing rock stress and fracture and application
CN111666699A (en) Rock mass engineering cross-scale simulation calculation method based on REV full-area coverage
Liu et al. Numerical modeling of acoustic emission during rock failure process using a Voronoi element based–explicit numerical manifold method
Bastola et al. Slope stability assessment of an open pit using lattice-spring-based synthetic rock mass (LS-SRM) modeling approach
Wang et al. Triaxial compression behavior of large-scale jointed coal: a numerical study
Mamaghani et al. Analysis of masonry structures under static and dynamic loading by discrete finite element method
Sawant et al. Finite element analysis of laterally loaded piles in sloping ground
Griffith et al. Integrating field observations and fracture mechanics models to constrain seismic source parameters for ancient earthquakes
Chen et al. Modeling progressive damage and failure of rock under continuous cyclic loading considering strength degradation of mesoscopic finite elements
Zheng et al. True triaxial test and DEM simulation of rock mechanical behaviors, meso-cracking mechanism and precursor subject to underground excavation disturbance
Pollock Material brittleness and the energetics of acoustic emission
Qu et al. Experimental study of the strip coal pillar models failure with different roof and floor conditions
Hazay et al. Introduction to the combined finite-discrete element method
Obara et al. Estimation of rock strength by means of rock stress measurement
Zhang et al. Study on Overburden Fracture and Structural Distribution Evolution Characteristics of Coal Seam Mining in Deep Large Mining Height Working Face
Liu et al. A phase-field model for blasting-induced failure and breakage analysis in rock masses
Hu et al. Effect of crack angle and length on mechanical and ultrasonic properties for the single cracked sandstone under triaxial stress loading-unloading
Li et al. Modeling failure and instability of a single-jointed rock column based on finite deformation theory

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant
CB03 Change of inventor or designer information
CB03 Change of inventor or designer information

Inventor after: Fu Jianxin

Inventor after: Tan Yuye

Inventor after: Song Weidong

Inventor after: Wang Jie

Inventor after: Li Yang

Inventor after: Cao Shuai

Inventor before: Fu Jianxin

Inventor before: Song Weidong

Inventor before: Wang Jie

Inventor before: Li Yang

Inventor before: Cao Shuai

Inventor before: Tan Yuye