CN113486521A - Economic benefit calculation method for replacing small coal-fired power plant by fuel cell power plant - Google Patents

Economic benefit calculation method for replacing small coal-fired power plant by fuel cell power plant Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN113486521A
CN113486521A CN202110774821.0A CN202110774821A CN113486521A CN 113486521 A CN113486521 A CN 113486521A CN 202110774821 A CN202110774821 A CN 202110774821A CN 113486521 A CN113486521 A CN 113486521A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
cost
power plant
fuel cell
parameters
small coal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202110774821.0A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
李帅虎
侯杰
刘制
王婷婷
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Xiangtan University
Original Assignee
Xiangtan University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Xiangtan University filed Critical Xiangtan University
Priority to CN202110774821.0A priority Critical patent/CN113486521A/en
Publication of CN113486521A publication Critical patent/CN113486521A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20Design optimisation, verification or simulation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/06Energy or water supply
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2111/00Details relating to CAD techniques
    • G06F2111/04Constraint-based CAD

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a method for calculating economic benefit of a fuel cell power station instead of a small coal-fired power plant, which comprises the following steps: respectively extracting cost model parameter information of the small coal-fired power plant and the fuel cell power plant in a project period and fitting the cost model parameter information to obtain a time curve of each parameter; calculating to obtain the power installed intervals of the fuel cell and the energy storage cell and the actual fuel consumption under each installed strategy according to the load characteristic curve of the small coal-fired power plant; substituting cost parameters in the cost models of the small coal-fired power plant and the battery power station into time values to respectively obtain the average annual cost of the small coal-fired power plant and the battery power station in respective project periods; and subtracting cost models of the small coal-fired power plant and the fuel cell power plant to obtain the economic benefit of the alternative scheme. The method considers the time value of each cost, can calculate the economic benefit of the alternative scheme under different strategies every year in several years, and provides an effective method for calculating the economic benefit of a fuel cell power station to replace a small coal-fired power plant.

Description

Economic benefit calculation method for replacing small coal-fired power plant by fuel cell power plant
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of fuel cell power generation, in particular to an economic benefit calculation method for a fuel cell power station to replace a small coal-fired power plant.
Background
With the increase of the ecological environment protection, the national emission standards of atmospheric pollutants, water body pollutants and the like emitted by coal and electricity are continuously getting stricter, structural adjustment is implemented on the coal and electricity, and China continues to implement shutdown policies on small coal-fired thermal power units with low coal-fired efficiency and high pollution emission, and then generates a plurality of problems such as re-employment, equipment treatment, vacant land idling and the like. The scheme of replacing a small coal-fired power plant by a pollution-free fuel cell power plant is proposed, but the engineering experience is still insufficient because no substantial engineering exists in China.
At present, domestic related research results and reports are roughly divided into two types: one is a static cost substitution calculation method, namely dividing the equipment purchase cost of the original small coal-fired power plant by the age limit, adding the equipment maintenance cost, the coal-fired cost, the annual coal-fired quantity and the environmental management cost to obtain the annual net present value of the original scheme, dividing the fuel cell equipment purchase cost of the fuel cell power station by the service life, the equipment maintenance cost, the fuel cost, the energy storage cell equipment purchase cost by the service life and the energy storage cell equipment maintenance cost by the addition to obtain the annual net present value of the alternative scheme, and subtracting the two to obtain the annual net present value after substitution; the other type is a dynamic cost substitution calculation method, namely substituting all the costs in the engineering age of the small coal-fired power plant into the discount rate and then adding the cost, dividing the cost by the age, substituting all the costs in the engineering age of the fuel cell power plant into the discount rate and then adding the cost, dividing the cost by the age, and subtracting the cost and the discount rate to obtain the net current value of the year.
The prior method has the following defects: the waste of resources due to the decrease in the power generation efficiency of the fuel cell at the non-rated load is not considered. The invention adopts a cost-benefit method to calculate the economical efficiency of the alternative scheme, uses the absolute economic benefit index as the investigation basis, establishes the benefit model of the scheme, determines the parameters in the model according to the prediction model of the actual power generation curve, the energy storage cell cost, the hydrogen energy cost and the fuel cell production cost, analyzes and calculates the optimal combination of the capacities of the fuel cell and the energy storage cell under different conditions, and the economic benefit of the alternative scheme compared with the original scheme.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention provides a method for calculating economic benefit of a fuel cell power station instead of a small-sized coal-fired power plant, and aims to solve the problem that in the project of replacing the small-sized coal-fired power plant by the fuel cell power station, the cost is influenced by resource waste caused by reduction of the power generation efficiency of a fuel cell under the condition of non-rated load, so that the cost is unreasonably calculated.
In order to achieve the above object, the present invention provides a method for calculating economic efficiency of a fuel cell power plant instead of a small-sized coal-fired power plant, comprising the steps of:
1) respectively extracting cost model parameter information of the small coal-fired power plant and the fuel cell power plant in a respective engineering period, and acquiring equipment purchase cost, equipment service life, equipment maintenance cost, coal combustion cost, annual coal combustion amount and environmental management cost of the small coal-fired power plant; acquiring fuel cell equipment purchase cost, equipment service life, equipment maintenance cost, fuel cost, energy storage cell equipment purchase cost and energy storage cell equipment maintenance cost of a fuel cell power station;
2) fitting each parameter in the model to obtain a relation curve of the cost of each parameter and time, collecting the prices of each cost parameter in the past year, and fitting the prices by using a function according with the trend to obtain a price function according with the change trend;
3) dividing parameters in the cost model of the small coal-fired power plant into parameters with time value and parameters without time value, calculating the parameters without time value, and converting the parameters with time value into years without time value parameters to obtain average annual expenditure of the small coal-fired power plant in one project period;
4) dividing parameters in the cost model of the fuel cell power station into parameters with time value and parameters without time value, calculating the parameters without time value, converting the parameters with time value into years without time value parameters, and obtaining average annual expenditure of the fuel cell power station in one project period;
5) according to different data in model elements, the cost model of the small coal-fired power plant is subtracted from the cost model of the fuel cell power plant to obtain the calculation result of the economic benefit of the fuel cell and the energy storage cell in the alternative scheme after implementation under different configurations in different years.
Compared with the prior art, the economic benefit calculation method for replacing the small coal-fired power plant by the fuel cell power station, disclosed by the invention, has the advantages that when the installed power of the fuel cell is calculated, the energy storage cell is introduced, the existing alternative scheme economic benefit calculation method for substituting the time value is rewritten, and the alternative scheme economic benefit calculation equation after the energy storage cell is added is constructed and considered.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of the annual net present value calculation steps of a small coal fired power plant being replaced of a fuel cell power plant replacing economic benefit calculation method of the small coal fired power plant of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a flow chart of the annual net present value calculation steps for a fuel cell power plant of an alternative to the economic efficiency calculation method of a fuel cell power plant of the present invention for replacing a small coal fired power plant;
FIG. 3 is a flow chart of the steps of the economic benefit calculation after an alternative implementation of the economic benefit calculation method of a fuel cell power plant instead of a small coal-fired power plant of the present invention.
Detailed Description
Step 101, obtaining the average annual cost profit of the small coal-fired power plant, wherein the average annual cost profit specifically comprises the equipment purchase cost P1Equipment installation cost P2Maintenance cost P of the apparatus3Coal charge P4Environmental governance cost P5Service life of coal burning equipment Td1(ii) a The average annual total cost of the small coal-fired power plant is obtained
profit=(P1+P2+P5)/Td1+P3+P4
102, replacing the economic benefit calculator profit of the small coal-fired power plant by the fuel cell power plant disclosed by the invention, wherein the economic benefit calculator profit comprises the following parameters: p1Is fitted with the collected historical data to obtain a fitted function of time and cost, the formula of which can be expressed as
P1=(a1t+b1)Q0
In the formula, Q0Is the total installed capacity of the coal-fired power plant, a1,b1Is the unit equipment purchase cost coefficient of the reference year, which is determined by the equipment purchase market cost of the reference year, and t is the year in which the plan is scheduled to be executed.
Installation cost P of the apparatus2Mainly depends on labor cost and is set as
P2=Q0k1i1 t
In the formula k1Is a unit equipment installation cost coefficient determined by the equipment installation market cost of the reference year, i1Is the coefficient of variation of installation cost.
Equipment maintenance cost P3Is set to P1Is expressed as
P3=k2P1
In the formula k2The maintenance factor is determined by the specific engineering.
Coal charge P4Then fitting is performed using the collected historical data to obtain a time-to-cost fit function, whose formula can be expressed as
P4=MR(a2t+b2)
In the formula MRIs the total mass (ton) of annual coal burning, a2,b2Is the unit coal cost coefficient of the reference year and is determined by the coal cost of the reference year.
Environmental governance cost P5Can be expressed as
Figure BDA0003154338700000031
In the formula VjRepresents the environmental value (Yuan/kg), d, of the j-th pollutantjAnd (4) representing the discharge amount of j pollutants, wherein m is the total number of pollutants, and F is the treatment cost paid for reducing the pollutants.
103, substituting each cost parameter in the profit into the time value to obtain the average annual cost in a project period after the implementation scheme of the t year
Figure BDA0003154338700000032
Step 201, obtaining an average annual total cost of the fuel cell power station, wherein the average annual total cost specifically comprises a fuel cell equipment purchase cost C1Installation cost of fuel cell equipment C2Maintenance fee C of fuel cell equipment3Fuel cost of fuel cell C4And the purchase and installation cost C of the energy storage battery equipment5Maintenance fee C of energy storage battery equipment6Annual energy storage battery replacement charge C7Service life T of fuel cell deviced2(ii) a The total annual cost of a fuel cell power plant is obtained
cost=C1/Td2+C2+C3+C4+C5+C6+C7
Step 202, among the parameters of cost: purchase cost of fuel cell equipment C1Fitting is carried out through the collected historical data to obtain a fitting function of time and cost, and a formula of the fitting function can be expressed as
Figure BDA0003154338700000033
In the formula, a3,b3Cost factor, Q, for unit fuel cell equipment of a reference year1Is the total installed capacity of the fuel cell power plant.
Installation cost of fuel cell equipment C2Mainly depends on labor cost and is set as
C2=Q1k3i2 t
In the formula k3Is a unit equipment installation cost coefficient determined by the equipment installation market cost of the reference year, i2The coefficient of variation of the installation cost of the fuel cell.
Fuel cell plant maintenance fee C3Is set to C4Is expressed as
C3=k4C4
In the formula k4The maintenance factor is determined by the specific engineering.
Fuel cost of fuel cell C4Is expressed as
C4=W1fq2
In the formula W1F is fuel consumption per kW of fuel cell power generation (kg/kW), q is the annual actual power generation amount of the fuel cell2The fuel price is obtained by fitting time and cost through collected historical data.
Energy storage battery equipment acquisition and installation cost C5Is expressed as
Figure BDA0003154338700000034
In the formula q3Fitting the unit cost of the energy storage battery by using the collected historical data to obtain a fitting function of time and cost, wherein k is selected according to the type of the required battery5For the installation cost factor per unit energy storage battery, i3Coefficient of variation, Q, for installation cost per unit of energy storage cell2The total installed capacity of the energy storage battery is obtained.
Energy storage battery equipment maintenance fee C6Is set to C5Is expressed as
C6=k5C5
In the formula k5The maintenance factor is determined by the specific engineering.
Annual energy storage battery replacement cost C7Is expressed as
C7=k6q3Q2/(1+i0)t
In the formula k6The annual natural elimination rate of the energy storage battery is high.
Step 203, in the economic benefit calculation method for replacing the small-sized coal-fired power plant by the fuel cell power plant, the replacement scheme is characterized in that power is generated by the fuel cell, and the peak-valley load smooth regulation effect can be realized by charging and discharging the energy storage battery, so that the cost is influenced by the resource waste generated by the reduction of the power generation efficiency of the fuel cell under the condition of not considering the non-rated load in the project of replacing the small-sized coal-fired power plant by the fuel cell power plant, and the problem of unreasonable cost calculation is reduced. Because the combined power generation of the fuel cell and the energy storage cell can replace the daily load curve of the original coal-fired power plant, the constraint condition of the output power of the fuel cell is
Q0=Q1+Q2
Annual actual power generation amount W of fuel cell1The constraint condition is
Figure BDA0003154338700000041
In the formula, WDirectly supplying the electric quantity of the power grid to the fuel cell; r is1The charge-discharge loss coefficient of the energy storage battery is obtained; w2And actually supplying power to the EV battery. By combining the actual conditions of the specific engineering and the constraint conditions, the calculation method can calculate the installed power intervals of the fuel cell and the energy storage cell and the economic benefits under different installed strategies.
Step 204, substituting each cost parameter in the cost into the time value to obtain the average annual cost in a project period after the implementation scheme of the t year
Figure BDA0003154338700000042
In the economic benefit calculation method for replacing the small-sized coal-fired power plant by the fuel cell power plant, the average net present value is substituted into the time value, and the average annual economic benefit calculation formula for replacing the small-sized coal-fired power plant by the fuel cell power plant with the substituted time value is obtained as
f=profitt-costt
FIG. 3 is a flow chart of the steps of the economic benefit calculation after the alternative embodiment of the economic benefit calculation method of the fuel cell power plant replacing the small coal-fired power plant of the invention is implemented, and the flow of the steps comprises:
1) the target coal-fired power plant basic information extraction module 301 is used for extracting the operation information of the small and medium coal-fired power plants and all the parameters required to be used in the alternative scheme;
2) a parameter information extraction module 302 that extracts information of each cost parameter obtained by collection;
3) the substituted parameter fitting module 303 reasonably fits all cost parameters in the small coal-fired power plant;
4) the original scheme cost calculation module 304 is used for putting the fitted data into a preset cost calculation function to obtain the average annual total cost of the original scheme;
5) a fuel cell power station parameter information extraction module 305, which obtains the basic scale of the alternative scheme through the analysis of the alternative scheme and collects the information of Russian cost parameters required by the alternative scheme;
6) the alternative scheme parameter information fitting module 306 is used for reasonably fitting all cost parameters in the fuel cell power station;
7) a parameter constraint calculation module 307 for analyzing and calculating the constraint conditions of each parameter in the replaced scheme and the alternative scheme;
8) the algorithm optimizing module 308 calculates an optimal strategy through an algorithm in each alternative strategy within the parameter constraint condition range, and calculates the average annual total cost of the alternative under the strategy;
9) and the economic benefit comparison module 309 calculates the difference between the alternative scheme and the alternative scheme to obtain the economic benefit of replacing the small coal-fired power plant by the fuel cell power plant in different years.
The invention looks ahead the future development of the fuel cell, proposes the economic benefit calculation method based on the fuel cell power station to replace the small-scale coal-fired power plant, under the premise of considering each item of cost difference after the small-scale coal-fired power plant replaced by the fuel cell, not only introduces the peak and valley reduction of the energy storage battery to reduce the cost under the partial load of the fuel cell, but also introduces the parameter variable containing time value and no time value, perfects the existing cost analysis method, gives the detailed calculation method and the steps for realizing the calculation method, and improves the economic benefit calculation method of the current fuel cell power station to replace the small-scale coal-fired power plant. The economic benefit calculation method for replacing the small-sized coal-fired power plant by the fuel cell power plant not only can consider the time value of each expense, but also can effectively consider the optimal configuration ratio of the fuel cell and the energy storage cell under different load characteristics, so that the calculation is more reasonable and feasible, the cost is saved, and an effective method is provided for the economic benefit calculation of replacing the small-sized coal-fired power plant by the fuel cell power plant.

Claims (7)

1. A method for calculating economic benefits of a fuel cell power plant instead of a small coal-fired power plant is characterized by comprising the following steps of:
1) a cost parameter extraction step, which is to respectively extract cost model parameter information of the small coal-fired power plant and the fuel cell power plant in a respective engineering period to obtain a total cost parameter of the small coal-fired power plant and a total cost parameter of the fuel cell power plant;
2) a price fitting calculation step, namely collecting the prices of all cost parameters in the past year, and obtaining a price function according with the change trend of the prices through fitting;
3) substituting the parameters into a time value calculation step, dividing the parameters in the cost model of the small coal-fired power plant into parameters with time values and parameters without time values, calculating the parameters without time values, converting the parameters with time values into years without time value parameters, and respectively obtaining average annual expenses of the small coal-fired power plant and the fuel cell power plant in a project period;
4) calculating a power constraint interval, namely calculating the installed power of the fuel cell and the installed power constraint of the energy storage cell of the alternative scheme according to the operation characteristic curve, the parameters of the fuel cell and the parameters of the energy storage cell of the actual coal-fired power plant of the project;
5) and an economic benefit calculation step, namely subtracting the cost model of the fuel cell power station from the cost model of the small coal-fired power plant according to different data in model elements to obtain the calculation result of the economic benefit of the fuel cell and the energy storage cell implemented under different configurations in different years in the alternative scheme.
2. The economic benefit calculation method of a fuel cell power plant instead of a small coal-fired power plant according to claim 1, wherein the cost parameter extraction step comprises the steps of:
1) the cost parameters of the small coal-fired power plant comprise equipment purchase cost, equipment service life, equipment maintenance cost, coal-fired cost, annual coal-fired quantity and environment treatment cost, and then the average annual total cost expression (P) of the small coal-fired power plant is obtained1+P2+P5)/Td1+P3+P4
2) The cost parameters of the fuel cell power station comprise equipment purchase cost, equipment service life, equipment maintenance cost, fuel cost, energy storage cell equipment purchase cost and energy storage cell equipment maintenance cost, and further the average annual total cost expression cost of the fuel cell power station is obtained1/Td2+C2+C3+C4+C5+C6+C7
3. The method for calculating economic benefits of a fuel cell power plant instead of a small coal-fired power plant according to claim 1, wherein the price fitting calculation step is characterized in that in the cost parameters collected in the cost parameter extraction step, a reference year is set according to engineering requirements, and then the relationship between price and time is fitted by using functions according with the development trend of each cost parameter, so as to obtain a price function of each cost parameter according with the time variation trend of the cost parameter.
4. The economic benefit calculation method for a fuel cell power plant instead of a small coal-fired power plant according to claim 1, the substituting time value calculation step comprising the steps of:
1) dividing parameters in the cost model of the small coal-fired power plant into parameters with time value and parameters without time value, calculating the parameters without time value, and converting the parameters with time value into parameters without time valueObtaining average annual expenditure of small coal-fired power plants in a project period by years without time value parameters
Figure FDA0003154338690000011
2) Dividing the parameters in the cost model of the fuel cell power station into parameters with time value and parameters without time value, calculating the parameters without time value, converting the parameters with time value into the years without time value parameters, and obtaining the average annual expenditure of the fuel cell power station in a project period
Figure FDA0003154338690000012
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the time-based and non-time-based cost parameters include time-based parameters, the method further comprising the steps of calculating economic efficiency of the fuel cell power plant in place of the small coal-based power plant, the small coal-based power plant including time-based parameters including equipment maintenance costs, coal-based costs, environmental governance costs; the small coal-fired power plant time-value-free parameters comprise equipment purchase cost and equipment installation cost; the time value parameters of the fuel cell power station comprise fuel cell equipment maintenance cost, fuel cost, energy storage cell equipment maintenance cost and energy storage cell replacement cost every year; the time value-free parameters of the fuel cell power station comprise the purchase and installation cost of fuel cell equipment and the purchase and installation cost of energy storage cell equipment.
6. The economic benefit calculation method for a fuel cell power plant to replace a small coal-fired power plant according to claim 1, wherein the power constraint interval calculation step is characterized in that a load characteristic curve of the small coal-fired power plant in the replaced scheme is collected, and an installed power constraint interval of the fuel cell and the energy storage cell in the replaced scheme and annual fuel consumption under different installed schemes are calculated by combining the fuel cell power characteristic curve and the charge-discharge loss of the energy storage cell in engineering practice.
7. The economic benefit calculation method of a fuel cell power plant replacing a small coal-fired power plant according to claim 1, wherein the economic benefit calculation step is characterized in that the average annual expenditure of the small coal-fired power plant in the replaced scheme is regarded as cash-in, the average annual expenditure of the fuel cell power plant in the replaced scheme is regarded as cash-out, and the economic benefit after the implementation of the replacement scheme is regarded as cash-in minus cash-out, so as to obtain the economic benefit of the replacement scheme under different fuel cell and energy storage cell installation strategies in different years, and the formula is f parametert-costtAnd all the calculations are completed.
CN202110774821.0A 2021-07-08 2021-07-08 Economic benefit calculation method for replacing small coal-fired power plant by fuel cell power plant Pending CN113486521A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110774821.0A CN113486521A (en) 2021-07-08 2021-07-08 Economic benefit calculation method for replacing small coal-fired power plant by fuel cell power plant

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110774821.0A CN113486521A (en) 2021-07-08 2021-07-08 Economic benefit calculation method for replacing small coal-fired power plant by fuel cell power plant

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN113486521A true CN113486521A (en) 2021-10-08

Family

ID=77938198

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202110774821.0A Pending CN113486521A (en) 2021-07-08 2021-07-08 Economic benefit calculation method for replacing small coal-fired power plant by fuel cell power plant

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN113486521A (en)

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120002241A1 (en) * 2009-03-09 2012-01-05 Ehud Chatow System and method for acquiring document services
CN104850899A (en) * 2015-04-17 2015-08-19 广东电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院 Method for calculating optimal consumption of carbon emission paid quota for coal-fired power plant
US20180254632A1 (en) * 2017-03-06 2018-09-06 Johnson Controls Technology Company Building energy storage system with planning tool
CN110532638A (en) * 2019-08-05 2019-12-03 广州汇电云联互联网科技有限公司 A kind of plant gas cost of electricity-generating measuring method excavated based on creation data
CN112183922A (en) * 2020-08-21 2021-01-05 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 Power generation and utilization combined optimization method and system for high-energy-consumption enterprise self-supply power plant

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120002241A1 (en) * 2009-03-09 2012-01-05 Ehud Chatow System and method for acquiring document services
CN104850899A (en) * 2015-04-17 2015-08-19 广东电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院 Method for calculating optimal consumption of carbon emission paid quota for coal-fired power plant
US20180254632A1 (en) * 2017-03-06 2018-09-06 Johnson Controls Technology Company Building energy storage system with planning tool
CN110532638A (en) * 2019-08-05 2019-12-03 广州汇电云联互联网科技有限公司 A kind of plant gas cost of electricity-generating measuring method excavated based on creation data
CN112183922A (en) * 2020-08-21 2021-01-05 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 Power generation and utilization combined optimization method and system for high-energy-consumption enterprise self-supply power plant

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
王道平 等: "污染物排放税机制下氮氧化物排放成本控制", 《工业工程与管理》 *

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Deng et al. Optimal sizing of wind-hydrogen system considering hydrogen demand and trading modes
Meng et al. The real cost of deep peak shaving for renewable energy accommodation in coal-fired power plants: Calculation framework and case study in China
Yechiel et al. Optimization of energy generation using landfill biogas
CN108053057B (en) Virtual power plant optimal scheduling modeling method based on CVaR
CN111697602B (en) Electrochemical energy storage system configuration and strategy making method based on demand regulation
CN101866451A (en) Novel wind power generation comprehensive benefit assessment method
Feng et al. Performance analysis of hybrid energy storage integrated with distributed renewable energy
CN114912943B (en) Virtual power plant medium-long term joint scheduling method considering carbon emission transaction
CN115358519A (en) Virtual power plant optimal scheduling method and device
CN116822977A (en) Emission reduction strategy generation method based on quantitative measurement and calculation of carbon emission reduction potential of enterprise
CN113673739B (en) Multi-time-space scale collaborative optimization operation method of distributed comprehensive energy system
CN112613742B (en) Capacity matching method for wind power hydrogen production system
CN116361674B (en) Optimal clustering method for load curves of optical storage type park based on expected cost minimization
CN116979512A (en) Big data-based power system peak shaving method and system
CN106203742A (en) A kind of grid equipment Energy efficiency evaluation based on energy-conservation return rate and selection method
CN113486521A (en) Economic benefit calculation method for replacing small coal-fired power plant by fuel cell power plant
Han et al. Analysis of economic operation model for virtual power plants considering the uncertainties of renewable energy power generation
CN112686454B (en) Energy efficiency optimization system and method of client side energy utilization control system
CN114548536A (en) Renewable energy planning method considering energy storage influence in electric power market environment
CN115358559A (en) Comprehensive energy system source storage capacity optimal configuration method considering comprehensive demand response
CN115204944A (en) Energy storage optimal peak-to-valley price difference measuring and calculating method and device considering whole life cycle
CN118539518A (en) Distributed source-load-storage resource comprehensive benefit evaluation method of intelligent energy system
Li et al. Comprehensive SustainabilityAssessment of China’s Electric Energy System Based on Emergy Analysis
Steidle Neto et al. Grid-Connected Photovoltaic System for Generating Energy to Dairy Farm Activities
CN107369032A (en) A kind of Spot Price pricing method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
WD01 Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication
WD01 Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication

Application publication date: 20211008