CN113435696B - Method and system for evaluating emergency disposal capability of rail transit vehicle dispatcher - Google Patents
Method and system for evaluating emergency disposal capability of rail transit vehicle dispatcher Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN113435696B CN113435696B CN202110553489.5A CN202110553489A CN113435696B CN 113435696 B CN113435696 B CN 113435696B CN 202110553489 A CN202110553489 A CN 202110553489A CN 113435696 B CN113435696 B CN 113435696B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- data
- simulation
- console
- fault simulation
- sub
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 32
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 199
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims description 46
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 29
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 16
- 238000012797 qualification Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000012163 sequencing technique Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000005236 sound signal Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06398—Performance of employee with respect to a job function
-
- G06Q50/40—
Abstract
The invention relates to the technical field of simulation tests, in particular to a method and a system for evaluating emergency handling capacity of a rail transit dispatcher, which comprises the steps of obtaining employee numbers and a plurality of fault simulation data; calling the corresponding fault simulation data according to the staff levels in the staff numbers, and sequentially sending a plurality of first subdata in the corresponding fault simulation data to a simulation console; the method comprises the steps of obtaining a qualified value and a completion duration, comparing the qualified value with the completion duration, and sending a qualified instruction to the simulation console if the completion duration is less than or equal to the qualified value.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of simulation tests, in particular to a method and a system for evaluating emergency handling capacity of a rail transit vehicle dispatcher.
Background
The rail transit vehicle dispatcher not only needs to master basic train dispatching operation in work, but also has certain emergency incident processing capability, and the occurrence probability of emergency incident is low in actual work, so that the rail transit vehicle dispatcher has the problems of unfamiliarity or forgetting of operation for processing emergency incident and the like.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a method, a device, equipment and a readable storage medium for evaluating the emergency handling capacity of a rail transit vehicle dispatcher so as to solve the problems.
In order to achieve the above object, the embodiments of the present application provide the following technical solutions:
in one aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a method for evaluating emergency handling capability of a rail transit dispatcher, where the method includes: acquiring staff member numbers and a plurality of fault simulation data, wherein the staff member numbers comprise staff member grades, each fault simulation data corresponds to one staff member grade, the fault simulation data comprise a plurality of fault simulation subdata, and the fault simulation subdata is data for simulating fault occurrence; calling the corresponding fault simulation data according to the staff level in the staff number, and sequentially sending a plurality of first subdata in the corresponding fault simulation data to a simulation console, wherein the first subdata is the fault simulation subdata; acquiring a qualified value and a completion time, comparing the qualified value with the completion time, and if the completion time is less than or equal to the qualified value, sending a qualified instruction to the simulation console, where the completion time is a time consumed by the simulation console for processing a plurality of faults simulated by the plurality of first subdata, and the qualified instruction is an instruction for causing the simulation console to display information on qualified qualification of the emergency handling capability of the dispatcher.
Preferably, the sequentially sending the plurality of first sub-data in the corresponding fault simulation data to a simulation console includes:
sequencing the plurality of first subdata, and sending one piece of the first subdata to the simulation console according to the sequence number of the first subdata;
and (3) sending operation: receiving a completion instruction sent by the simulation console, and sending another unsent first sub-data to the simulation console according to the size of the serial number of the unsent first sub-data, where the completion instruction is an instruction for the simulation console to complete processing a fault simulated by the first sub-data;
and repeatedly executing the sending operation until the plurality of faults simulated by the plurality of first subdata are processed and finished by the simulation console, and counting the finishing time length.
Preferably, after comparing the qualified value with the size of the completion duration, the method further includes:
if the completion time length is greater than the qualified value, sending an unqualified instruction and the completion time length to the simulation console, wherein the unqualified instruction is an instruction for enabling the simulation console to display information about unqualified dispatcher emergency handling capability assessment;
and acquiring a first operation manual, and sending the first operation manual to a learning terminal corresponding to the staff member number, wherein the first operation manual is an operation step for solving the first subdata simulation fault.
Preferably, after sending the qualified command to the simulation console, the method further includes:
acquiring an operation evaluation comparison table, wherein the evaluation comparison table comprises a plurality of sub comparison tables, each sub comparison table comprises one employee level and a plurality of corresponding evaluation thresholds, and each evaluation threshold is a reference range value of the completion time;
calling a corresponding sub-comparison table according to the staff level in the student number;
finding an evaluation threshold containing the completion time in the corresponding sub-lookup table;
and sending a corresponding operation rating to the simulation console according to the evaluation threshold, wherein the operation rating is a grade numerical value or a grade character for evaluating the emergency handling capability of the dispatcher.
Preferably, the calling the corresponding fault simulation data according to the staff member level in the staff member number includes:
calling a plurality of fault simulation data, and numbering the fault simulation data, wherein the number of the fault simulation data is the same as the numerical value of the staff level corresponding to the corresponding fault simulation data;
calling the staff member number, and acquiring a first numerical value on a numerical value position corresponding to the staff member grade in the staff member number;
and finding out one fault simulation data with the same number as the first numerical value from the plurality of fault simulation data according to the first numerical value.
Preferably, the obtaining the qualified value and the completion time length includes:
acquiring initial time and the number of the first subdata, wherein the initial time is the time for sending the first subdata to the simulation console;
detecting a current sending numerical value, and if the sending numerical value is equal to the number of the first subdata, recording the current time as a termination time, wherein the sending numerical value is the number of the first subdata sent to the simulation console;
and calculating the difference between the initial time and the termination time to obtain the completion time, wherein the completion time is the absolute value of the difference.
In a second aspect, an embodiment of the application provides a rail transit dispatcher emergency handling capability evaluation system, where the system includes a first data acquisition module, configured to acquire a staff member number and multiple fault simulation data, where the staff member number includes staff member grades, each fault simulation data corresponds to one staff member grade, and the fault simulation data includes multiple fault simulation subdata, where the fault simulation subdata is data for simulating a fault occurrence;
the first calculation module is used for calling the corresponding fault simulation data according to the staff level in the staff number, and sequentially sending a plurality of first subdata in the corresponding fault simulation data to a simulation console, wherein the first subdata are the fault simulation subdata; and
the second calculation module is configured to obtain a qualified value and a completion duration, compare the qualified value with the completion duration, and send a qualified instruction to the simulation console if the completion duration is less than or equal to the qualified value, where the completion duration is a duration consumed by the simulation console for processing the plurality of faults simulated by the plurality of first subdata, and the qualified instruction is an instruction for causing the simulation console to display information on qualification of the emergency handling capability of the dispatcher.
Preferably, the first calculation module comprises:
the first computing unit is configured to sequence the plurality of first sub-data, and send one piece of the first sub-data to the analog console according to the sequence number of the first sub-data;
a second computing unit to perform a send operation: receiving a completion instruction sent by the simulated console, and sending another unsent first sub-data to the simulated console according to the size of the serial number of the unsent first sub-data, where the completion instruction is an instruction for the simulated console to complete processing of a fault simulated by the first sub-data;
and the third calculating unit is used for repeatedly executing the sending operation until the plurality of faults simulated by the plurality of first subdata are processed and completed by the simulation console, and counting the completing time length.
Preferably, the second calculation module includes:
a fourth calculating unit, configured to send an unqualified instruction and the completion duration to the simulated console if the completion duration is greater than the qualified value, where the unqualified instruction is an instruction for the simulated console to display information that the dispatcher emergency handling capability examination is unqualified;
and the fifth calculation unit is used for acquiring a first operation manual, and sending the first operation manual to a learning terminal corresponding to the employee number, wherein the first operation manual is an operation step for solving the first sub-data simulation fault.
Preferably, the second calculation module comprises:
a first data acquisition unit, configured to acquire an operation evaluation comparison table, where the evaluation comparison table includes a plurality of sub comparison tables, where each sub comparison table includes one employee level and a plurality of corresponding evaluation thresholds, and each evaluation threshold is a reference range value of the completion time;
a sixth calculating unit, configured to call a corresponding sub-comparison table according to the staff level in the student number;
a seventh calculating unit, configured to find an evaluation threshold containing the completion time in the corresponding sub-lookup table;
and the eighth computing unit is used for sending a corresponding operation rating to the simulation console according to the evaluation threshold, wherein the operation rating is a grade numerical value or a grade character for evaluating the emergency handling capability of the dispatcher.
Preferably, the first calculation module comprises:
a ninth calculating unit, configured to retrieve a plurality of the fault simulation data and number the plurality of fault simulation data, where the number of the fault simulation data is the same as a staff level value corresponding to the corresponding fault simulation data;
a tenth calculating unit, configured to retrieve the staff member number and obtain a first numerical value in a numerical digit corresponding to the staff member level in the staff member number;
a tenth calculating unit, configured to find one of the fault simulation data having the same number as the first numerical value from among the plurality of fault simulation data according to the first numerical value.
Preferably, the first calculation module comprises:
a second data obtaining unit, configured to obtain initial time and a quantity of the first sub-data, where the initial time is time for sending a first piece of the first sub-data to the console;
a twelfth calculating unit, configured to detect a current sending value, and if the sending value is equal to the number of the first sub-data, record a current time as an end time, where the sending value is the number of the first sub-data that has been sent to the analog console;
a thirteenth calculating unit, configured to calculate a difference between the initial time and the end time to obtain a completion time, where the completion time is an absolute value of the difference.
In a third aspect, the embodiment of the application provides a rail transit dispatcher emergency handling capability assessment device, which includes a memory and a processor. The memory is used for storing a computer program; the processor is used for realizing the steps of the rail transit vehicle dispatcher emergency handling capacity evaluation method when executing the computer program.
In a fourth aspect, the present application provides a readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, where the computer program, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the method for evaluating emergency handling capability of a rail transit dispatcher.
The beneficial effects of the invention are as follows:
the rail transit vehicle dispatcher of different staff levels can regularly learn or review the operation for processing the emergency by regularly testing the emergency handling capacity of the rail transit vehicle dispatcher, so that the rail transit vehicle dispatcher is prevented from forgetting the operation for processing the emergency in the long-term work without the emergency, and the grasping condition of the operation for processing the emergency by the rail transit vehicle dispatcher corresponding to the current time period and the staff number can be detected.
Additional features and advantages of the invention will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by the practice of the embodiments of the invention. The objectives and other advantages of the invention will be realized and attained by the structure particularly pointed out in the written description and claims hereof as well as the appended drawings.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention, the drawings needed to be used in the embodiments will be briefly described below, it should be understood that the following drawings only illustrate some embodiments of the present invention and therefore should not be considered as limiting the scope, and for those skilled in the art, other related drawings can be obtained according to the drawings without inventive efforts.
Fig. 1 is a schematic flow chart of a method for evaluating emergency handling capability of a rail transit dispatcher in the embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 2 is a schematic structural diagram of a rail transit dispatcher emergency handling capability evaluation system in the embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 3 is a schematic structural diagram of an evaluation device for emergency handling capability of a rail transit dispatcher in the embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the embodiments of the present invention clearer, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are some, but not all, embodiments of the present invention. The components of embodiments of the present invention generally described and illustrated in the figures herein may be arranged and designed in a wide variety of different configurations. Thus, the following detailed description of the embodiments of the present invention, as presented in the figures, is not intended to limit the scope of the invention, as claimed, but is merely representative of selected embodiments of the invention. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
It should be noted that: like reference numbers or letters refer to like items in the following figures, and thus, once an item is defined in one figure, it need not be further defined or explained in subsequent figures. Meanwhile, in the description of the present invention, the terms "first", "second", and the like are used only for distinguishing the description, and are not to be construed as indicating or implying relative importance.
Example 1
As shown in fig. 1, the present embodiment provides a rail transit dispatcher emergency handling capability assessment method, which includes step S1, step S2 and step S3.
S1, acquiring staff member numbers and a plurality of fault simulation data, wherein the staff member numbers comprise staff member levels, each fault simulation data corresponds to one staff member level, the fault simulation data comprise a plurality of fault simulation subdata, and the fault simulation subdata is data simulating fault occurrence;
the fault simulation subdata described in this embodiment is data that enables the simulation console to simulate a corresponding fault and further simulate an emergency.
The plurality of fault simulation data in this embodiment covers a plurality of emergency events that may be encountered by all staff levels from a low level to a high level in a work and practice operation, and because the rail transit vehicle dispatcher of different staff levels can dispatch or operate different resources, there is a certain difference in the related emergency events that can be handled, that is, the higher the staff level is, the more the related resources that can be dispatched are, the more the types of the handled emergency events are, and thus each fault simulation data corresponds to a different staff level.
S2, calling corresponding fault simulation data according to the staff levels in the staff numbers, and sequentially sending a plurality of first subdata in the corresponding fault simulation data to a simulation console, wherein the first subdata are the fault simulation subdata;
preferably, in this implementation, the second numerical value of the staff serial number is recorded as a staff level corresponding to the rail transit vehicle dispatcher, and after the server obtains the staff serial number, the server reads the second numerical value in the staff serial number, and finds the corresponding fault simulation data through the second numerical value;
after the corresponding fault simulation data is found, the server reads the multiple fault simulation subdata in the fault simulation data, and sorts or numbers the multiple fault simulation subdata, the server may send the fault simulation subdata to the simulation console in sequence from large to small or from small to large according to the number, and meanwhile, when sending the completion instruction sent by the simulation console, the server sends the next fault simulation subdata according to the size of the number of the fault simulation subdata until the multiple fault simulation subdata are all sent to the simulation console, and stops sending the completion instruction.
S3, obtaining a qualified value and a completion time, comparing the qualified value with the completion time, and if the completion time is less than or equal to the qualified value, sending a qualified instruction to the simulation console, wherein the completion time is the time consumed by the simulation console for processing the plurality of faults simulated by the plurality of first subdata, and the qualified instruction is an instruction for enabling the simulation console to display information qualified about the qualification of the emergency handling capability of the dispatcher.
In this embodiment, the server may determine whether all the first sub-data in the fault simulation data is sent by counting the number of the sent fault simulation sub-data, detect, when all the first sub-data are sent, a time for receiving a completion instruction sent by the last simulation console, and combine the time for sending the first sub-data to obtain a time consumed by the simulation console for completing processing the plurality of first sub-data in the fault simulation data, determine, by determining the length of the consumed time, a processing capability of the track traffic driving dispatcher corresponding to the employee number for an emergency event, and determine that the processing capability is qualified if the related processing operation is completed within a specified time, that is, the completion time is less than or equal to the qualified value.
The invention can lead the rail transit vehicle dispatcher to regularly learn or review the operation for processing the emergency incident by regularly testing the emergency handling capability of the rail transit vehicle dispatcher with different staff levels, prevent the rail transit vehicle dispatcher from forgetting the operation for processing the emergency incident in the long-term work without the emergency incident, and simultaneously detect the mastering condition of the operation for processing the emergency incident by the rail transit vehicle dispatcher corresponding to the current time period and staff number.
In a specific embodiment of the present disclosure, the step S2 includes:
s21, sequencing the plurality of pieces of first subdata, and sending one piece of first subdata to the simulation console according to the sequence number of the first subdata;
step S22, sending operation: receiving a completion instruction sent by the simulation console, and sending another unsent first sub-data to the simulation console according to the size of the serial number of the unsent first sub-data, where the completion instruction is an instruction for the simulation console to complete processing a fault simulated by the first sub-data;
and S23, repeatedly executing the sending operation until the plurality of faults simulated by the plurality of first subdata are processed and completed by the simulation console, and counting the completing time length.
In this embodiment, the called first sub-data are respectively numbered, and then a sending sequence of each first sub-data is determined according to the number, and it should be noted that when a next piece of first sub-data is sent, sending operation should be performed when a completion instruction corresponding to a previous piece of first sub-data sent by the analog console is received, and sending is stopped until all the first sub-data are sent to the analog console.
In a specific embodiment of the present disclosure, after comparing the qualified value with the completion duration in step S3, the method further includes:
s31, if the completion duration is greater than the qualified value, sending an unqualified instruction and the completion duration to the simulation console, wherein the unqualified instruction is an instruction for enabling the simulation console to display information about unqualified dispatcher emergency handling capability examination;
and S32, acquiring a first operation manual, and sending the first operation manual to a learning terminal corresponding to the staff member number, wherein the first operation manual is an operation step for solving the first subdata simulation fault.
The embodiment discloses a server countermeasure when the completion duration is greater than the qualified value, that is, when the examination is unqualified, the server countermeasure is to send an unqualified instruction to the sending simulation console, then call a first operation manual for processing the first subdata simulated fault, and send the first operation manual to the learning terminal corresponding to the employee number.
In a specific embodiment of the present disclosure, after the step S3, the method further includes:
s33, obtaining an operation evaluation comparison table, wherein the evaluation comparison table comprises a plurality of sub comparison tables, each sub comparison table comprises one employee level and a plurality of corresponding evaluation thresholds, and each evaluation threshold is a reference range value of the completion time;
s34, calling a corresponding sub-comparison table according to the staff level in the student number;
s35, finding an evaluation threshold value containing the completion time in the corresponding sub-comparison table;
and S36, sending a corresponding operation rating to the simulation console according to the evaluation threshold, wherein the operation rating is a grade numerical value or a grade character for evaluating the emergency handling capability of the dispatcher.
The embodiment discloses a method for evaluating the operation proficiency of the rail transit vehicle dispatcher corresponding to the qualified student number according to the completion duration, wherein the operation proficiency can be divided into S, A, B, C and other levels, each sub-comparison table corresponds to one employee level, and the processing capacity of each rail transit vehicle dispatcher on emergency emergencies can be judged more accurately by detecting the operation proficiency of the rail transit vehicle dispatcher.
In a specific embodiment of the present disclosure, the step S2 includes:
s24, calling a plurality of fault simulation data, and numbering the fault simulation data, wherein the number of the fault simulation data is the same as the value of the staff level corresponding to the corresponding fault simulation data;
s25, calling the staff member number, and acquiring a first numerical value on a numerical value position corresponding to the staff member grade in the staff member number;
and S26, finding out one fault simulation data with the same serial number as the first numerical value from the plurality of fault simulation data according to the first numerical value.
The embodiment discloses a specific method for calling the corresponding fault simulation data according to the staff member level in the staff member number, namely, a plurality of fault simulation data are numbered first, and the fault simulation data are numbered according to the mapping relation between the fault simulated by the fault simulation data and the staff member level during numbering, so that the serial number of the fault simulation data is the same as the numerical value of the staff member level, and when matching and searching are carried out, the fault simulation data with the serial number being the same as the first numerical value only need to be found according to the first numerical value in the staff member number.
In a specific embodiment of the present disclosure, the step S2 includes:
s27, obtaining initial time and the number of the first subdata, wherein the initial time is the time for sending the first subdata to the simulation console;
step S28, detecting a current sending numerical value, and if the sending numerical value is equal to the number of the first subdata, recording the current time as the termination time, wherein the sending numerical value is the number of the first subdata sent to the simulation console;
and S29, calculating a difference value between the initial time and the termination time to obtain a completion time, wherein the completion time is an absolute value of the difference value.
In this embodiment, the server may determine whether all the first sub-data in the fault simulation data is sent by counting the number of the sent fault simulation sub-data, and when all the first sub-data are sent, calculate time consumed by the simulation console for completing processing of the plurality of first sub-data in the fault simulation data by detecting time of receiving the completion instruction sent by the last simulation console, that is, termination time, and combining the time of sending the first sub-data, that is, the initial time, and determine, by determining the length of the time consumed, capability of the track transportation vehicle scheduling operator corresponding to the employee number for processing the emergency event.
Example 2
As shown in fig. 2, the present embodiment provides a rail transit dispatcher emergency handling capability evaluation system, which includes a first calculation module 71, a second calculation module 72 and a first sending module 73.
A first data obtaining module 71, configured to obtain a staff member number and multiple pieces of fault simulation data, where the staff member number includes staff member levels, each piece of fault simulation data corresponds to one staff member level, the fault simulation data includes multiple pieces of fault simulation subdata, and the fault simulation subdata is data for simulating a fault occurrence;
a first calculating module 72, configured to call the corresponding fault simulation data according to the employee level in the employee number, and sequentially send a plurality of first sub-data in the corresponding fault simulation data to a simulation console, where the first sub-data is the fault simulation sub-data; and
the second calculating module 73 is configured to obtain a qualified value and a completion duration, compare the qualified value with the completion duration, and send a qualified instruction to the simulated console if the completion duration is less than or equal to the qualified value, where the completion duration is a duration consumed by the simulated console for processing the plurality of faults simulated by the plurality of first subdata, and the qualified instruction is an instruction for causing the simulated console to display information that the dispatcher emergency handling capability qualification is qualified.
In a specific embodiment of the present disclosure, the first calculation module 72 includes:
a first calculating unit 721, configured to sequence the multiple pieces of first sub-data, and send one piece of the first sub-data to the console according to the sequence number of the first sub-data;
a second calculating unit 722, configured to perform a sending operation: receiving a completion instruction sent by the simulation console, and sending another unsent first sub-data to the simulation console according to the size of the serial number of the unsent first sub-data, where the completion instruction is an instruction for the simulation console to complete processing a fault simulated by the first sub-data;
the third calculating unit 723 is configured to repeatedly execute the sending operation until the plurality of failures simulated by the plurality of first sub data are processed by the simulation console, and count the completion time.
In a specific embodiment of the present disclosure, the second calculating module 73 includes:
a fourth calculating unit 731, configured to send an unqualified instruction and the completion duration to the console if the completion duration is greater than the qualified value, where the unqualified instruction is an instruction for the console to display information that the dispatcher emergency handling capability examination is unqualified;
a fifth calculating unit 732, configured to obtain a first operation manual, which is an operation procedure for solving the first sub-data simulation fault, and send the first operation manual to a learning terminal corresponding to the staff member number.
In a specific embodiment of the present disclosure, the second calculating module 73 includes:
a first data acquisition unit 733 configured to acquire an operation evaluation comparison table including a plurality of sub comparison tables including one employee level and a plurality of corresponding evaluation thresholds, the evaluation thresholds being reference range values of the completion time;
a sixth calculating unit 734, configured to call a corresponding sub-comparison table according to the staff member level in the student number;
a seventh calculating unit 735, configured to find an evaluation threshold containing the completion time in the corresponding sub-lookup table;
an eighth calculating unit 736, configured to send, according to the evaluation threshold, a corresponding operation rating to the simulation console, where the operation rating is a grade value or a grade character for evaluating the emergency handling capability of the dispatcher.
In a specific embodiment of the present disclosure, the first calculation module 72 includes:
a ninth calculating unit 724 configured to retrieve a plurality of the fault simulation data and number the plurality of the fault simulation data, where the number of the fault simulation data is the same as a numerical value of a staff level corresponding to the corresponding fault simulation data;
a tenth calculating unit 725, configured to retrieve the staff member number, and obtain a first numerical value in a numerical digit corresponding to the staff member level in the staff member number;
a tenth calculating unit 726, configured to find one of the fault simulation data having the same number as the first numerical value according to the first numerical value.
In a specific embodiment of the present disclosure, the first calculation module 72 includes:
a second data obtaining unit 727, configured to obtain initial time and the number of the first subdata, where the initial time is time for sending the first subdata to the analog console;
a twelfth calculating unit 728, configured to detect a current sending value, and if the sending value is equal to the number of the first sub-data, record a current time as an end time, where the sending value is the number of the first sub-data that has been sent to the analog console;
a thirteenth calculating unit 729, configured to calculate a difference between the initial time and the termination time to obtain a completion time, where the completion time is an absolute value of the difference.
It should be noted that, regarding the apparatus in the above embodiment, the specific manner in which each module performs the operation has been described in detail in the embodiment related to the method, and will not be elaborated herein.
Example 3
Corresponding to the above method embodiment, the embodiment of the present disclosure further provides a rail transit dispatcher emergency disposal capability evaluation device, and the rail transit dispatcher emergency disposal capability evaluation device described below and the rail transit dispatcher emergency disposal capability evaluation method described above may be referred to in correspondence.
Fig. 3 is a block diagram illustrating a rail transit dispatcher emergency handling capability assessment device 800 according to an exemplary embodiment. As shown in fig. 3, the electronic device 800 may include: a processor 801, a memory 802. The electronic device 800 may also include one or more of a multimedia component 803, an input/output (I/O) interface 804, and a communications component 805.
The processor 801 is configured to control overall operations of the electronic device 800, so as to complete all or part of the steps in the method for evaluating the emergency handling capability of the rail transit dispatcher. The memory 402 is used to store various types of data to support operation at the electronic device 800, such as instructions for any application or method operating on the electronic device 800 and application-related data, such as contact data, transmitted and received messages, pictures, audio, video, and so forth. The Memory 802 may be implemented by any type of volatile or non-volatile Memory device or combination thereof, such as Static Random Access Memory (SRAM), electrically Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (EEPROM), erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (EPROM), programmable Read-Only Memory (PROM), read-Only Memory (ROM), magnetic Memory, flash Memory, magnetic disk or optical disk. The multimedia components 803 may include screen and audio components. Wherein the screen may be, for example, a touch screen and the audio component is used for outputting and/or inputting audio signals. For example, the audio component may include a microphone for receiving an external audio signal. The received audio signal may further be stored in the memory 802 or transmitted through the communication component 805. The audio assembly also includes at least one speaker for outputting audio signals. The I/O interface 804 provides an interface between the processor 801 and other interface modules, such as a keyboard, mouse, buttons, etc. These buttons may be virtual buttons or physical buttons. The communication component 805 is used for wired or wireless communication between the electronic device 800 and other devices. Wireless communication, such as Wi-Fi, bluetooth, near Field Communication (NFC), 2G, 3G, or 4G, or a combination of one or more of them, so that the corresponding communication component 805 may include: wi-Fi module, bluetooth module, NFC module.
In an exemplary embodiment, the electronic Device 800 may be implemented by one or more Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), digital Signal Processors (DSPs), digital Signal Processing Devices (DSPDs), programmable Logic Devices (PLDs), field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), controllers, microcontrollers, microprocessors, or other electronic components, for performing the above-described rail transit dispatcher emergency handling capability evaluation method.
In another exemplary embodiment, a computer readable storage medium including program instructions is further provided, which when executed by a processor, implement the steps of the rail transit vehicle dispatcher emergency handling capability assessment method described above. For example, the computer readable storage medium may be the memory 802 including the program instructions, which are executable by the processor 801 of the electronic device 800 to perform the method for evaluating the emergency handling capability of the rail transit dispatcher.
Example 4
Corresponding to the above method embodiment, the embodiment of the present disclosure further provides a readable storage medium, and one of the readable storage medium described below and the rail transit dispatcher emergency handling capability assessment method described above may be referred to correspondingly.
A readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, where the computer program, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the method for evaluating the emergency handling capability of a rail transit vehicle dispatcher in the above method embodiment.
The readable storage medium may be a usb disk, a removable hard disk, a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a Random Access Memory (RAM), a magnetic disk or an optical disk, and various other readable storage media capable of storing program codes.
The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention and is not intended to limit the present invention, and various modifications and changes may be made by those skilled in the art. Any modification, equivalent replacement, or improvement made within the spirit and principle of the present invention should be included in the protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (6)
1. The rail transit vehicle dispatcher emergency handling capacity evaluation method is characterized by comprising the following steps of:
acquiring a staff member number and a plurality of fault simulation data, wherein the staff member number comprises staff member grades, each fault simulation data corresponds to one staff member grade, the fault simulation data comprises a plurality of fault simulation subdata, and the fault simulation subdata is data for simulating fault occurrence;
calling the corresponding fault simulation data according to the staff level in the staff number, and sequentially sending a plurality of first subdata in the corresponding fault simulation data to a simulation console, wherein the first subdata is the fault simulation subdata, and a second numerical value of the staff number is marked as the staff level corresponding to the rail transit vehicle dispatcher; and
acquiring a qualified value and a completion duration, comparing the qualified value with the completion duration, and if the completion duration is less than or equal to the qualified value, sending a qualified instruction to the simulation console, where the completion duration is a duration consumed by the simulation console for processing a plurality of faults simulated by the plurality of first subdata, and the qualified instruction is an instruction for causing the simulation console to display information on qualified qualification of dispatcher emergency handling capability;
after comparing the qualified value with the size of the completion duration, the method further comprises:
if the completion duration is greater than the qualified value, sending an unqualified instruction and the completion duration to the simulation console, wherein the unqualified instruction is an instruction for enabling the simulation console to display information about unqualified dispatcher emergency handling capability examination;
acquiring a first operation manual, and sending the first operation manual to a learning terminal corresponding to the staff member number, wherein the first operation manual is an operation step for solving the first subdata simulation fault;
wherein, in sending a plurality of first subdata in the corresponding fault simulation data to simulation console in proper order, include:
sequencing the plurality of first subdata, and sending one piece of first subdata to the simulation console according to the sequence number of the first subdata;
and (3) sending operation: receiving a completion instruction sent by the simulated console, and sending another unsent first sub-data to the simulated console according to the size of the serial number of the unsent first sub-data, where the completion instruction is an instruction for the simulated console to complete processing of a fault simulated by the first sub-data;
and repeatedly executing the sending operation until the plurality of faults simulated by the plurality of first subdata data are processed and completed by the simulation console, and counting the completing time length.
2. The method for evaluating the emergency handling capability of the rail transit dispatcher according to claim 1, wherein after the sending of the qualified command to the simulation console, the method further comprises:
acquiring an operation evaluation comparison table, wherein the evaluation comparison table comprises a plurality of sub comparison tables, each sub comparison table comprises one employee level and a plurality of corresponding evaluation thresholds, and each evaluation threshold is a reference range value of the completion duration;
calling a corresponding sub-comparison table according to the staff member grade in the staff member number;
finding an evaluation threshold value containing the completion duration in the corresponding sub-comparison table;
and sending a corresponding operation rating to the simulation console according to the evaluation threshold, wherein the operation rating is a grade numerical value or a grade character for evaluating the emergency handling capability of the dispatcher.
3. The method for assessing the emergency handling capability of a rail transit dispatcher according to claim 1, wherein the calling of the corresponding fault simulation data according to the employee level in the employee number comprises:
calling a plurality of fault simulation data, and numbering the fault simulation data, wherein the number of the fault simulation data is the same as the numerical value of the staff level corresponding to the corresponding fault simulation data;
calling the staff member number, and acquiring a first numerical value on a numerical value bit corresponding to the staff member grade in the staff member number;
and finding out one fault simulation data with the same number as the first numerical value from the plurality of fault simulation data according to the first numerical value.
4. Rail transit vehicle dispatcher emergency treatment ability evaluation system, its characterized in that includes:
the fault simulation system comprises a first data acquisition module, a second data acquisition module and a fault simulation module, wherein the first data acquisition module is used for acquiring staff numbers and a plurality of fault simulation data, the staff numbers comprise staff levels, each fault simulation data corresponds to one staff level, the fault simulation data comprise a plurality of fault simulation subdata, and the fault simulation subdata is data for simulating fault occurrence;
the first calculation module is used for calling the corresponding fault simulation data according to the staff member levels in the staff member numbers and sequentially sending a plurality of first subdata in the corresponding fault simulation data to a simulation console, wherein the first subdata is the fault simulation subdata, and second numerical values of the staff member numbers are marked as staff member levels corresponding to the rail transit vehicle dispatchers; and
the second calculation module is used for acquiring a qualified value and a completion time length, comparing the qualified value with the completion time length, and if the completion time length is smaller than or equal to the qualified value, sending a qualified instruction to the simulation console, wherein the completion time length is the time length consumed by the simulation console for processing a plurality of faults simulated by the plurality of first subdata, and the qualified instruction is an instruction for enabling the simulation console to display information qualified about the qualification of the emergency handling capability of a dispatcher;
the second computing module comprises:
the fourth computing unit is used for sending an unqualified instruction and the completion time length to the simulation console if the completion time length is greater than the qualified value, wherein the unqualified instruction is an instruction for enabling the simulation console to display information about unqualified dispatcher emergency handling capability examination;
a fifth calculating unit, configured to obtain a first operation manual, and send the first operation manual to a learning terminal corresponding to the staff member number, where the first operation manual is an operation step for solving the first sub-data simulation fault;
wherein the first computing module comprises:
the first computing unit is configured to sequence the plurality of first sub-data, and send one piece of the first sub-data to the analog console according to the sequence number of the first sub-data;
a second computing unit to perform a send operation: receiving a completion instruction sent by the simulation console, and sending another unsent first sub-data to the simulation console according to the size of the serial number of the unsent first sub-data, where the completion instruction is an instruction for the simulation console to complete processing a fault simulated by the first sub-data;
and a third calculating unit, configured to repeatedly execute the sending operation until the plurality of faults simulated by the plurality of first sub data have been processed by the simulation console, and count the completion duration.
5. The rail transit dispatcher emergency handling capability assessment system of claim 4, wherein the second calculation module comprises:
a first data acquisition unit, configured to acquire an operation evaluation comparison table, where the evaluation comparison table includes a plurality of sub comparison tables, where each sub comparison table includes an employee level and a plurality of corresponding evaluation thresholds, and each evaluation threshold is a reference range value of the completion duration;
a sixth calculating unit, configured to call a corresponding sub-lookup table according to the employee level in the employee number;
a seventh calculating unit, configured to find an evaluation threshold containing the completion duration in the corresponding sub-lookup table;
and the eighth computing unit is used for sending a corresponding operation rating to the simulation console according to the evaluation threshold, wherein the operation rating is a grade numerical value or a grade character for evaluating the emergency handling capability of the dispatcher.
6. The rail transit dispatcher emergency handling capability assessment system of claim 4, wherein the first computing module comprises:
a ninth calculating unit, configured to retrieve a plurality of the fault simulation data and number the plurality of the fault simulation data, where the number of the fault simulation data is the same as a value of a staff level corresponding to the corresponding fault simulation data;
a tenth calculating unit, configured to retrieve the staff member number and obtain a first numerical value in a numerical digit corresponding to the staff member level in the staff member number;
a tenth calculating unit, configured to find one of the fault simulation data having the same number as the first numerical value from among the plurality of fault simulation data according to the first numerical value.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110553489.5A CN113435696B (en) | 2021-05-20 | 2021-05-20 | Method and system for evaluating emergency disposal capability of rail transit vehicle dispatcher |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110553489.5A CN113435696B (en) | 2021-05-20 | 2021-05-20 | Method and system for evaluating emergency disposal capability of rail transit vehicle dispatcher |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN113435696A CN113435696A (en) | 2021-09-24 |
| CN113435696B true CN113435696B (en) | 2023-04-07 |
Family
ID=77802543
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110553489.5A Active CN113435696B (en) | 2021-05-20 | 2021-05-20 | Method and system for evaluating emergency disposal capability of rail transit vehicle dispatcher |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN113435696B (en) |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103745624A (en) * | 2013-12-26 | 2014-04-23 | 北京交控科技有限公司 | Track traffic simulation system |
| CN105913713A (en) * | 2016-06-14 | 2016-08-31 | 成都运达科技股份有限公司 | Subway scheduling simulation training system and method |
| CN107291538A (en) * | 2017-06-14 | 2017-10-24 | 中国人民解放军信息工程大学 | The mimicry cloud construction method of oriented mission and the method for scheduling task based on mimicry cloud, device, system |
Family Cites Families (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110489849A (en) * | 2019-08-13 | 2019-11-22 | 沈阳风驰软件股份有限公司 | The simulation management method, apparatus and equipment of railcar business sending and receiving vehicle business |
| CN112116844B (en) * | 2020-09-21 | 2022-02-08 | 北京中航科电测控技术股份有限公司 | Reconfigurable aircraft avionics simulation training system |
-
2021
- 2021-05-20 CN CN202110553489.5A patent/CN113435696B/en active Active
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103745624A (en) * | 2013-12-26 | 2014-04-23 | 北京交控科技有限公司 | Track traffic simulation system |
| CN105913713A (en) * | 2016-06-14 | 2016-08-31 | 成都运达科技股份有限公司 | Subway scheduling simulation training system and method |
| CN107291538A (en) * | 2017-06-14 | 2017-10-24 | 中国人民解放军信息工程大学 | The mimicry cloud construction method of oriented mission and the method for scheduling task based on mimicry cloud, device, system |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN113435696A (en) | 2021-09-24 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN107256650B (en) | Exercise pushing method and system and terminal equipment | |
| CN109976998B (en) | Software defect prediction method and device and electronic equipment | |
| CN105653438B (en) | The striding course automated testing method and device of Android device | |
| CN115358897B (en) | Student management method, system, terminal and storage medium based on electronic student identity card | |
| CN111401228A (en) | Video target labeling method and device and electronic equipment | |
| CN113504935A (en) | Software development quality evaluation method and device, electronic equipment and readable storage medium | |
| CN113596844A (en) | Early warning method, device, medium and electronic equipment based on data information | |
| CN102402873A (en) | System and method for analysing learning weaknesses according to question types | |
| CN113435696B (en) | Method and system for evaluating emergency disposal capability of rail transit vehicle dispatcher | |
| CN111477051A (en) | Evaluation method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110427277B (en) | Data verification method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110688173A (en) | Positioning method and device of components in cross-platform interface framework and electronic equipment | |
| CN100570576C (en) | A kind of method of testing of embedded system and system | |
| CN113902457A (en) | Method and device for evaluating reliability of house source information, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN113270009A (en) | Dispatcher earthquake early warning capability evaluation method and system | |
| CN114691903A (en) | Intelligent course testing method and system, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110866492B (en) | Baseline branch identification method and device and computer system | |
| KR102168556B1 (en) | System of training assessment | |
| CN113643773B (en) | Method and system for improving psychological adaptability of railway dispatcher | |
| CN110971448B (en) | System and method for simulating current network running system through webpage | |
| CN109491921B (en) | Management method and system of buried point information | |
| CN109408380B (en) | Game system defect management method and device and electronic equipment | |
| CN101793932A (en) | Electrostatic test system, electrostatic test operating system and electrostatic test method | |
| CN113538186A (en) | Personal learning management method, device, equipment and readable storage medium | |
| CN114219255A (en) | Capability analysis method, device, equipment and readable storage medium |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |