CN113378420A - Method for predicting service life of crack pipeline - Google Patents
Method for predicting service life of crack pipeline Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN113378420A CN113378420A CN202011359750.XA CN202011359750A CN113378420A CN 113378420 A CN113378420 A CN 113378420A CN 202011359750 A CN202011359750 A CN 202011359750A CN 113378420 A CN113378420 A CN 113378420A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- crack
- pipeline
- model
- depth
- service life
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 20
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000013398 bayesian method Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000000704 physical effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000035882 stress Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000032683 aging Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001351 cycling effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009659 non-destructive testing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003209 petroleum derivative Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000246 remedial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
- G06F30/23—Design optimisation, verification or simulation using finite element methods [FEM] or finite difference methods [FDM]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2113/00—Details relating to the application field
- G06F2113/14—Pipes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2119/00—Details relating to the type or aim of the analysis or the optimisation
- G06F2119/04—Ageing analysis or optimisation against ageing
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)
Abstract
The invention belongs to the technical field of pipeline service life prediction, and particularly relates to an integrated prediction method for a crack pipeline. The shape of the pipeline crack is semi-elliptical, the fatigue crack grows along with the variable load in the pipeline, and the initial size of the crack is detected by an online detection tool. The method integrates the characteristics of a traditional Paris law crack growth model and online detection data, and improves the accuracy of the prediction model by updating the parameters of the prediction physical model, so that more accurate service life prediction is carried out. The service life prediction method can be widely applied to operation and maintenance management of the crack pipeline.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of pipeline service life prediction, and relates to an integrated prediction method for a crack pipeline.
Background
Pipelines are considered the safest and most economical way to transport large quantities of oil and gas products. 94% of the refined petroleum products and most of the oil and gas outlets are transported by pipeline. Pipes present different types of defects such as fatigue cracks, corrosion, etc. Without proper remedial action, these defects can ultimately lead to pipe failure, including leaks or ruptures, which can result in very expensive down time, as well as leakage and leakage of the pipe contents into the environment. Currently, pipeline companies commonly perform on-line inspections periodically using on-line inspection tools to detect defects and assess pipeline health. Fatigue cracks refer to the propagation of fatigue cracks during pipe operation due to pressure cycling.
Fatigue cracks are a main defect type of pipelines, the existing prediction model of the service life of the cracked pipelines has larger errors, and the treatment of the fatigue cracks is always an important task for managing the integrity of the pipelines. However, existing in-line inspection (ILI) tools have significant uncertainty in fatigue crack measurements and typically have an error of about plus or minus 1 mm, with 80% confidence. In addition, the current crack propagation model method based on the Paris law is mainly used for fatigue crack propagation life prediction. Uncertainty in crack size and life prediction physical models can affect the time to failure of a pipe due to fatigue cracks, leading to significant uncertainty and conservation in determining integrity management and risk management strategies such as repair, pipe replacement, pressure reduction, and water pressure testing.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to overcome the defects of the prior art in prediction accuracy and provide a method for greatly improving the prediction accuracy of the service life of a cracked pipeline.
The technical scheme adopted by the invention for solving the technical problems is as follows:
a method for predicting the service life of a cracked pipeline comprises the following steps:
step 1: simulating the pipeline crack by using a semiellipse, calculating a stress intensity factor of the surface of the pipeline crack, and selecting a Raju and Newman method or an API579 or BS7910 or a finite element simulation model to calculate stress concentration factors of all parts of the surface of the crack aiming at different pipeline strengths and physical properties;
step 2: establishing a crack growth model, establishing a growth model through two coupled Paris laws, and researching the fatigue expansion problem of the semi-elliptical surface cracks in the length and width expansion directions of the two cracks; the concrete formula is as follows:
in the formula, Δ KAAnd Δ KBA range of stress intensity factors at the surface point and depth of the surface crack; CA. CB, mA, and mB are material constants;
and step 3: compared with the unchanged model parameters of the traditional physical model, under a given m value, the growth prediction of the crack from the currently measured crack length and depth is carried out by using Paris law, and the crack size is expanded to the length and depth measured in the next inspection period in a certain period; observing the crack length and the crack depth in the next inspection period due to the existence of a measurement error e and a model error epsilon, namely obtaining the estimated crack length and depth, thereby obtaining a likelihood function l (a, b | m) for Bayesian inference of the following formula; according to the central limit theory, the influence of model errors on crack length estimation mainly depends on the mean value of the crack length estimation;
and 4, step 4: and predicting the crack growth after the data detection time point by using the updated model parameters to obtain a crack growth prediction model and a crack pipeline service life prediction model.
As a further improvement of the invention, C isA=CB、mA=mB(ii) a And (4) expanding the original hemielliptic crack into a new hemielliptic crack based on the two coupled Paris fatigue laws.
The invention has the beneficial effects that:
1. the prediction model method can be combined with a finite element modeling method or other empirical formulas, and integrates a crack growth physical model and online detection data to update model parameters by using a Bayesian method, so that more accurate life prediction is achieved.
Because the influence of the parameter m on the crack path and the prediction result is far greater than that of the parameter C, the more accurate life prediction can be obtained by updating the model parameter m.
Drawings
The invention is further illustrated with reference to the following figures and examples.
Fig. 1 is a crack propagation curve at m =3 for ILI #2 at 10 months and 18 days in 2013;
FIG. 2 is a crack propagation curve after physical model parameters are updated based on ILI #2 as a check point.
Detailed Description
The collected in-line inspection data (ILI) and non-destructive testing data (NDE) are shown in Table 1 below.
TABLE 1
Using the conventional physical model method, we used the on-line inspection data #1 as the basis of the crack initiation size data, and since the accuracy (standard deviation) of the on-line inspection tool was 0.0196 inch, the initial crack depth was estimated in the industry using a conservative method to be 0.039+0.0196=0.0586inch, and based on the crack propagation curve at m =3, the crack depth was 0.05923 inches at 10 months and 28 days in 2014, as shown in table 2 below. The new initial crack depths were 0.079+0.0196=0.0986 inches, respectively, as measured by ILI #2 at 10 months and 18 days in 2013. Finally, a crack propagation curve at m =3 for ILI #2 as shown in fig. 1 was obtained by a crack growth model, where the X-axis of fig. 1 is the aging time and the Y-axis is the crack depth.
TABLE 2
Using the proposed integration method under the same data conditions, our analysis results are shown below. We used ILI #2 as a checkpoint and the physical model parameter update results are shown in Table 3.
The crack depth predictions at 10 months and 28 days 2014 are shown in table 4. The analysis result can be observed, and the prediction precision of the existing physical model is greatly improved by the proposed method; meanwhile, fig. 2 is a crack propagation curve after updating of physical model parameters based on ILI #2 as a check point.
TABLE 3
TABLE 4
In light of the foregoing description of the preferred embodiment of the present invention, many modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The technical scope of the present invention is not limited to the content of the specification, and must be determined according to the scope of the claims.
Claims (2)
1. A method for predicting the service life of a crack pipeline is characterized by comprising the following steps: the method comprises the following steps:
step 1: simulating the pipeline crack by using a semiellipse, calculating a stress intensity factor of the surface of the pipeline crack, and selecting a Raju and Newman method or an API579 or BS7910 or a finite element simulation model to calculate stress concentration factors of all parts of the surface of the crack aiming at different pipeline strengths and physical properties;
step 2: establishing a crack growth model, establishing a growth model through two coupled Paris fatigue laws, and researching the fatigue expansion problem of the semielliptical surface cracks in the length and width expansion directions of the two cracks; the concrete formula is as follows:
in the formula,. DELTA.KAAnd Δ KBA range of stress intensity factors at the surface point and depth of the surface crack; cA、CB、mAAnd mBIs the material constant; da/dN and db/dN are the growth rates of the crack length and depth unit period, respectively; n is the number of cycles;
and step 3: compared with the unchanged model parameters of the traditional physical model, under the given m value, the growth prediction of the crack from the currently measured crack length and depth is carried out by using the Paris's law, and the crack size is expanded to the length and depth measured in the next inspection period under a certain period; observing the crack length and the crack depth in the next inspection period due to the existence of a measurement error e and a model error epsilon, so as to obtain the estimated crack length and depth, thereby obtaining a likelihood function l (a, b | m), and obtaining a post probability function by using a Bayesian method; according to the central limit theory, the influence of model errors on crack length estimation mainly depends on the mean value of the crack length estimation;
and 4, step 4: and predicting the crack growth after the data detection time point by using the updated model parameters to obtain a crack growth prediction model and a crack pipeline service life prediction model.
2. A method of predicting the life of a cracked pipe as claimed in claim 1, wherein: is provided with CA=CB、mA=mB(ii) a And (4) expanding the original hemielliptic crack into a new hemielliptic crack based on the two coupled Paris fatigue laws.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202011359750.XA CN113378420A (en) | 2020-11-27 | 2020-11-27 | Method for predicting service life of crack pipeline |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202011359750.XA CN113378420A (en) | 2020-11-27 | 2020-11-27 | Method for predicting service life of crack pipeline |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN113378420A true CN113378420A (en) | 2021-09-10 |
Family
ID=77569051
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202011359750.XA Pending CN113378420A (en) | 2020-11-27 | 2020-11-27 | Method for predicting service life of crack pipeline |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN113378420A (en) |
Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105825030A (en) * | 2016-04-01 | 2016-08-03 | 长沙理工大学 | Method for evaluating fatigue life of aged reinforced concrete bridge |
CN107133400A (en) * | 2017-05-03 | 2017-09-05 | 厦门大学 | A kind of aircraft structure fatigue reliability Bayes's combination forecasting method |
CN108460230A (en) * | 2018-03-21 | 2018-08-28 | 西安建筑科技大学 | Corrosion oil-gas pipeline remaining life based on data fusion and Reliability Prediction Method |
CN108920792A (en) * | 2018-06-21 | 2018-11-30 | 北京工业大学 | A kind of agitating friction weldering Fatigue Life Prediction method based on crackle extension |
CN109241609A (en) * | 2018-08-31 | 2019-01-18 | 华东交通大学 | A kind of Bayesian dynamic prediction method based on markov chain Monte-Carlo |
CN109918776A (en) * | 2019-03-05 | 2019-06-21 | 北京航空航天大学 | The engineering prediction on fatigue crack growth method of engineering goods based on two-step least square method |
CN111751199A (en) * | 2020-06-09 | 2020-10-09 | 西北工业大学 | Fatigue life prediction method based on EIFS distribution |
CN111783243A (en) * | 2020-06-18 | 2020-10-16 | 东南大学 | Metal structure fatigue crack propagation life prediction method based on filtering algorithm |
-
2020
- 2020-11-27 CN CN202011359750.XA patent/CN113378420A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105825030A (en) * | 2016-04-01 | 2016-08-03 | 长沙理工大学 | Method for evaluating fatigue life of aged reinforced concrete bridge |
CN107133400A (en) * | 2017-05-03 | 2017-09-05 | 厦门大学 | A kind of aircraft structure fatigue reliability Bayes's combination forecasting method |
CN108460230A (en) * | 2018-03-21 | 2018-08-28 | 西安建筑科技大学 | Corrosion oil-gas pipeline remaining life based on data fusion and Reliability Prediction Method |
CN108920792A (en) * | 2018-06-21 | 2018-11-30 | 北京工业大学 | A kind of agitating friction weldering Fatigue Life Prediction method based on crackle extension |
CN109241609A (en) * | 2018-08-31 | 2019-01-18 | 华东交通大学 | A kind of Bayesian dynamic prediction method based on markov chain Monte-Carlo |
CN109918776A (en) * | 2019-03-05 | 2019-06-21 | 北京航空航天大学 | The engineering prediction on fatigue crack growth method of engineering goods based on two-step least square method |
CN111751199A (en) * | 2020-06-09 | 2020-10-09 | 西北工业大学 | Fatigue life prediction method based on EIFS distribution |
CN111783243A (en) * | 2020-06-18 | 2020-10-16 | 东南大学 | Metal structure fatigue crack propagation life prediction method based on filtering algorithm |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
MINGJIANG XIE等: "An Integrated Prognostics Approach for Pipeline Fatigue Crack Growth Prediction Utilizing Inline Inspection Data", JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY, vol. 140, pages 031702 - 1 * |
魏宗平;: "结构疲劳裂纹扩展寿命的区间预测", 机床与液压, no. 15, pages 68 - 71 * |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Gomes et al. | Optimal inspection planning for onshore pipelines subject to external corrosion | |
CN106355320B (en) | Method for evaluating reliability of corrosion of falling object of submarine oil and gas pipeline of grey system | |
Leander et al. | Reliability-based fatigue assessment of steel bridges using LEFM–A sensitivity analysis | |
KR102581072B1 (en) | Method for evaluating life and risk degree of high temperature pipe | |
CN110334429B (en) | Method for predicting residual fatigue life of asphalt pavement | |
US8156812B2 (en) | Method for non-destructive inspection | |
Brennan | Risk based maintenance for offshore wind structures | |
Otegui | Challenges to the integrity of old pipelines buried in stable ground | |
CN111474109A (en) | Test method for predicting service life of thermoplastic plastic in oil-gas environment | |
CN114091320A (en) | Natural gas pipeline corrosion failure time prediction method and device | |
Kale et al. | A probabilistic model for internal corrosion of gas pipelines | |
Timashev et al. | Markov description of corrosion defects growth and its application to reliability based inspection and maintenance of pipelines | |
CN113378420A (en) | Method for predicting service life of crack pipeline | |
CN109784590B (en) | In-service oil and gas pipeline corrosion prediction method based on CAGM (1,1) -BPNN | |
Zou et al. | A risk-informed decision support tool for holistic management of fatigue design, inspection and maintenance | |
RU2603884C1 (en) | Method of determining allowable internal pressure for main pipeline linear part section with stress-corrosion crack | |
Lockey et al. | Modelling shallow dents using local regression methods and finite element analysis | |
CN116973294B (en) | Corrosion fatigue test method considering matching relation between environmental corrosion rate and load history | |
Shlyushenkov et al. | Modeling the fatigue failure processes in evaluating the reliability of machines and their components | |
Purnana et al. | Fitness for Service Assessment of Cross Country Oil Pipelines Based on API 579 (Application of API 579 on ASME B 31.4) | |
Van Dang et al. | Updating the Failure Probability of Miter Gates Based on Observation of Water Levels | |
CN114492232B (en) | Submarine pipeline corrosion sensitive factor analysis method | |
Qin et al. | Reliability analysis of corroding pipelines considering the growth and generation of corrosion defects | |
Afrizayatman et al. | Inspection Measuring Point Optimization on Piping System at PT. Pertamina Hulu Mahakam (PHM) | |
Shetty | Probabilistic fatigue assessment of welded joints |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |