CN113378420A - Method for predicting service life of crack pipeline - Google Patents

Method for predicting service life of crack pipeline Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN113378420A
CN113378420A CN202011359750.XA CN202011359750A CN113378420A CN 113378420 A CN113378420 A CN 113378420A CN 202011359750 A CN202011359750 A CN 202011359750A CN 113378420 A CN113378420 A CN 113378420A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
crack
pipeline
model
depth
service life
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202011359750.XA
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
谢明江
苏春
张辉
邢佑强
吴泽
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Southeast University
Original Assignee
Southeast University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Southeast University filed Critical Southeast University
Priority to CN202011359750.XA priority Critical patent/CN113378420A/en
Publication of CN113378420A publication Critical patent/CN113378420A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20Design optimisation, verification or simulation
    • G06F30/23Design optimisation, verification or simulation using finite element methods [FEM] or finite difference methods [FDM]
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2113/00Details relating to the application field
    • G06F2113/14Pipes
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2119/00Details relating to the type or aim of the analysis or the optimisation
    • G06F2119/04Ageing analysis or optimisation against ageing

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)

Abstract

The invention belongs to the technical field of pipeline service life prediction, and particularly relates to an integrated prediction method for a crack pipeline. The shape of the pipeline crack is semi-elliptical, the fatigue crack grows along with the variable load in the pipeline, and the initial size of the crack is detected by an online detection tool. The method integrates the characteristics of a traditional Paris law crack growth model and online detection data, and improves the accuracy of the prediction model by updating the parameters of the prediction physical model, so that more accurate service life prediction is carried out. The service life prediction method can be widely applied to operation and maintenance management of the crack pipeline.

Description

Method for predicting service life of crack pipeline
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of pipeline service life prediction, and relates to an integrated prediction method for a crack pipeline.
Background
Pipelines are considered the safest and most economical way to transport large quantities of oil and gas products. 94% of the refined petroleum products and most of the oil and gas outlets are transported by pipeline. Pipes present different types of defects such as fatigue cracks, corrosion, etc. Without proper remedial action, these defects can ultimately lead to pipe failure, including leaks or ruptures, which can result in very expensive down time, as well as leakage and leakage of the pipe contents into the environment. Currently, pipeline companies commonly perform on-line inspections periodically using on-line inspection tools to detect defects and assess pipeline health. Fatigue cracks refer to the propagation of fatigue cracks during pipe operation due to pressure cycling.
Fatigue cracks are a main defect type of pipelines, the existing prediction model of the service life of the cracked pipelines has larger errors, and the treatment of the fatigue cracks is always an important task for managing the integrity of the pipelines. However, existing in-line inspection (ILI) tools have significant uncertainty in fatigue crack measurements and typically have an error of about plus or minus 1 mm, with 80% confidence. In addition, the current crack propagation model method based on the Paris law is mainly used for fatigue crack propagation life prediction. Uncertainty in crack size and life prediction physical models can affect the time to failure of a pipe due to fatigue cracks, leading to significant uncertainty and conservation in determining integrity management and risk management strategies such as repair, pipe replacement, pressure reduction, and water pressure testing.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to overcome the defects of the prior art in prediction accuracy and provide a method for greatly improving the prediction accuracy of the service life of a cracked pipeline.
The technical scheme adopted by the invention for solving the technical problems is as follows:
a method for predicting the service life of a cracked pipeline comprises the following steps:
step 1: simulating the pipeline crack by using a semiellipse, calculating a stress intensity factor of the surface of the pipeline crack, and selecting a Raju and Newman method or an API579 or BS7910 or a finite element simulation model to calculate stress concentration factors of all parts of the surface of the crack aiming at different pipeline strengths and physical properties;
step 2: establishing a crack growth model, establishing a growth model through two coupled Paris laws, and researching the fatigue expansion problem of the semi-elliptical surface cracks in the length and width expansion directions of the two cracks; the concrete formula is as follows:
Figure RE-59689DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
Figure RE-22834DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
in the formula, Δ KAAnd Δ KBA range of stress intensity factors at the surface point and depth of the surface crack; CA. CB, mA, and mB are material constants;
and step 3: compared with the unchanged model parameters of the traditional physical model, under a given m value, the growth prediction of the crack from the currently measured crack length and depth is carried out by using Paris law, and the crack size is expanded to the length and depth measured in the next inspection period in a certain period; observing the crack length and the crack depth in the next inspection period due to the existence of a measurement error e and a model error epsilon, namely obtaining the estimated crack length and depth, thereby obtaining a likelihood function l (a, b | m) for Bayesian inference of the following formula; according to the central limit theory, the influence of model errors on crack length estimation mainly depends on the mean value of the crack length estimation;
Figure RE-458364DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
and 4, step 4: and predicting the crack growth after the data detection time point by using the updated model parameters to obtain a crack growth prediction model and a crack pipeline service life prediction model.
As a further improvement of the invention, C isA=CB、mA=mB(ii) a And (4) expanding the original hemielliptic crack into a new hemielliptic crack based on the two coupled Paris fatigue laws.
The invention has the beneficial effects that:
1. the prediction model method can be combined with a finite element modeling method or other empirical formulas, and integrates a crack growth physical model and online detection data to update model parameters by using a Bayesian method, so that more accurate life prediction is achieved.
Because the influence of the parameter m on the crack path and the prediction result is far greater than that of the parameter C, the more accurate life prediction can be obtained by updating the model parameter m.
Drawings
The invention is further illustrated with reference to the following figures and examples.
Fig. 1 is a crack propagation curve at m =3 for ILI #2 at 10 months and 18 days in 2013;
FIG. 2 is a crack propagation curve after physical model parameters are updated based on ILI #2 as a check point.
Detailed Description
The collected in-line inspection data (ILI) and non-destructive testing data (NDE) are shown in Table 1 below.
TABLE 1
Figure RE-503506DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
Using the conventional physical model method, we used the on-line inspection data #1 as the basis of the crack initiation size data, and since the accuracy (standard deviation) of the on-line inspection tool was 0.0196 inch, the initial crack depth was estimated in the industry using a conservative method to be 0.039+0.0196=0.0586inch, and based on the crack propagation curve at m =3, the crack depth was 0.05923 inches at 10 months and 28 days in 2014, as shown in table 2 below. The new initial crack depths were 0.079+0.0196=0.0986 inches, respectively, as measured by ILI #2 at 10 months and 18 days in 2013. Finally, a crack propagation curve at m =3 for ILI #2 as shown in fig. 1 was obtained by a crack growth model, where the X-axis of fig. 1 is the aging time and the Y-axis is the crack depth.
TABLE 2
Figure RE-DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
Using the proposed integration method under the same data conditions, our analysis results are shown below. We used ILI #2 as a checkpoint and the physical model parameter update results are shown in Table 3.
The crack depth predictions at 10 months and 28 days 2014 are shown in table 4. The analysis result can be observed, and the prediction precision of the existing physical model is greatly improved by the proposed method; meanwhile, fig. 2 is a crack propagation curve after updating of physical model parameters based on ILI #2 as a check point.
TABLE 3
Figure RE-81993DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
TABLE 4
Figure RE-560247DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
In light of the foregoing description of the preferred embodiment of the present invention, many modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The technical scope of the present invention is not limited to the content of the specification, and must be determined according to the scope of the claims.

Claims (2)

1. A method for predicting the service life of a crack pipeline is characterized by comprising the following steps: the method comprises the following steps:
step 1: simulating the pipeline crack by using a semiellipse, calculating a stress intensity factor of the surface of the pipeline crack, and selecting a Raju and Newman method or an API579 or BS7910 or a finite element simulation model to calculate stress concentration factors of all parts of the surface of the crack aiming at different pipeline strengths and physical properties;
step 2: establishing a crack growth model, establishing a growth model through two coupled Paris fatigue laws, and researching the fatigue expansion problem of the semielliptical surface cracks in the length and width expansion directions of the two cracks; the concrete formula is as follows:
Figure FDA0002803652020000011
Figure FDA0002803652020000012
in the formula,. DELTA.KAAnd Δ KBA range of stress intensity factors at the surface point and depth of the surface crack; cA、CB、mAAnd mBIs the material constant; da/dN and db/dN are the growth rates of the crack length and depth unit period, respectively; n is the number of cycles;
and step 3: compared with the unchanged model parameters of the traditional physical model, under the given m value, the growth prediction of the crack from the currently measured crack length and depth is carried out by using the Paris's law, and the crack size is expanded to the length and depth measured in the next inspection period under a certain period; observing the crack length and the crack depth in the next inspection period due to the existence of a measurement error e and a model error epsilon, so as to obtain the estimated crack length and depth, thereby obtaining a likelihood function l (a, b | m), and obtaining a post probability function by using a Bayesian method; according to the central limit theory, the influence of model errors on crack length estimation mainly depends on the mean value of the crack length estimation;
Figure FDA0002803652020000013
and 4, step 4: and predicting the crack growth after the data detection time point by using the updated model parameters to obtain a crack growth prediction model and a crack pipeline service life prediction model.
2. A method of predicting the life of a cracked pipe as claimed in claim 1, wherein: is provided with CA=CB、mA=mB(ii) a And (4) expanding the original hemielliptic crack into a new hemielliptic crack based on the two coupled Paris fatigue laws.
CN202011359750.XA 2020-11-27 2020-11-27 Method for predicting service life of crack pipeline Pending CN113378420A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202011359750.XA CN113378420A (en) 2020-11-27 2020-11-27 Method for predicting service life of crack pipeline

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202011359750.XA CN113378420A (en) 2020-11-27 2020-11-27 Method for predicting service life of crack pipeline

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN113378420A true CN113378420A (en) 2021-09-10

Family

ID=77569051

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202011359750.XA Pending CN113378420A (en) 2020-11-27 2020-11-27 Method for predicting service life of crack pipeline

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN113378420A (en)

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105825030A (en) * 2016-04-01 2016-08-03 长沙理工大学 Method for evaluating fatigue life of aged reinforced concrete bridge
CN107133400A (en) * 2017-05-03 2017-09-05 厦门大学 A kind of aircraft structure fatigue reliability Bayes's combination forecasting method
CN108460230A (en) * 2018-03-21 2018-08-28 西安建筑科技大学 Corrosion oil-gas pipeline remaining life based on data fusion and Reliability Prediction Method
CN108920792A (en) * 2018-06-21 2018-11-30 北京工业大学 A kind of agitating friction weldering Fatigue Life Prediction method based on crackle extension
CN109241609A (en) * 2018-08-31 2019-01-18 华东交通大学 A kind of Bayesian dynamic prediction method based on markov chain Monte-Carlo
CN109918776A (en) * 2019-03-05 2019-06-21 北京航空航天大学 The engineering prediction on fatigue crack growth method of engineering goods based on two-step least square method
CN111751199A (en) * 2020-06-09 2020-10-09 西北工业大学 Fatigue life prediction method based on EIFS distribution
CN111783243A (en) * 2020-06-18 2020-10-16 东南大学 Metal structure fatigue crack propagation life prediction method based on filtering algorithm

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105825030A (en) * 2016-04-01 2016-08-03 长沙理工大学 Method for evaluating fatigue life of aged reinforced concrete bridge
CN107133400A (en) * 2017-05-03 2017-09-05 厦门大学 A kind of aircraft structure fatigue reliability Bayes's combination forecasting method
CN108460230A (en) * 2018-03-21 2018-08-28 西安建筑科技大学 Corrosion oil-gas pipeline remaining life based on data fusion and Reliability Prediction Method
CN108920792A (en) * 2018-06-21 2018-11-30 北京工业大学 A kind of agitating friction weldering Fatigue Life Prediction method based on crackle extension
CN109241609A (en) * 2018-08-31 2019-01-18 华东交通大学 A kind of Bayesian dynamic prediction method based on markov chain Monte-Carlo
CN109918776A (en) * 2019-03-05 2019-06-21 北京航空航天大学 The engineering prediction on fatigue crack growth method of engineering goods based on two-step least square method
CN111751199A (en) * 2020-06-09 2020-10-09 西北工业大学 Fatigue life prediction method based on EIFS distribution
CN111783243A (en) * 2020-06-18 2020-10-16 东南大学 Metal structure fatigue crack propagation life prediction method based on filtering algorithm

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
MINGJIANG XIE等: "An Integrated Prognostics Approach for Pipeline Fatigue Crack Growth Prediction Utilizing Inline Inspection Data", JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY, vol. 140, pages 031702 - 1 *
魏宗平;: "结构疲劳裂纹扩展寿命的区间预测", 机床与液压, no. 15, pages 68 - 71 *

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Gomes et al. Optimal inspection planning for onshore pipelines subject to external corrosion
CN106355320B (en) Method for evaluating reliability of corrosion of falling object of submarine oil and gas pipeline of grey system
Leander et al. Reliability-based fatigue assessment of steel bridges using LEFM–A sensitivity analysis
KR102581072B1 (en) Method for evaluating life and risk degree of high temperature pipe
CN110334429B (en) Method for predicting residual fatigue life of asphalt pavement
US8156812B2 (en) Method for non-destructive inspection
Brennan Risk based maintenance for offshore wind structures
Otegui Challenges to the integrity of old pipelines buried in stable ground
CN111474109A (en) Test method for predicting service life of thermoplastic plastic in oil-gas environment
CN114091320A (en) Natural gas pipeline corrosion failure time prediction method and device
Kale et al. A probabilistic model for internal corrosion of gas pipelines
Timashev et al. Markov description of corrosion defects growth and its application to reliability based inspection and maintenance of pipelines
CN113378420A (en) Method for predicting service life of crack pipeline
CN109784590B (en) In-service oil and gas pipeline corrosion prediction method based on CAGM (1,1) -BPNN
Zou et al. A risk-informed decision support tool for holistic management of fatigue design, inspection and maintenance
RU2603884C1 (en) Method of determining allowable internal pressure for main pipeline linear part section with stress-corrosion crack
Lockey et al. Modelling shallow dents using local regression methods and finite element analysis
CN116973294B (en) Corrosion fatigue test method considering matching relation between environmental corrosion rate and load history
Shlyushenkov et al. Modeling the fatigue failure processes in evaluating the reliability of machines and their components
Purnana et al. Fitness for Service Assessment of Cross Country Oil Pipelines Based on API 579 (Application of API 579 on ASME B 31.4)
Van Dang et al. Updating the Failure Probability of Miter Gates Based on Observation of Water Levels
CN114492232B (en) Submarine pipeline corrosion sensitive factor analysis method
Qin et al. Reliability analysis of corroding pipelines considering the growth and generation of corrosion defects
Afrizayatman et al. Inspection Measuring Point Optimization on Piping System at PT. Pertamina Hulu Mahakam (PHM)
Shetty Probabilistic fatigue assessment of welded joints

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination