CN113268865B

CN113268865B - Aircraft behavior modeling construction method based on regular flow chain

Info

Publication number: CN113268865B
Application number: CN202110517866.XA
Authority: CN
Inventors: 伊山; 刘晓光; 燕玉林; 张洋; 李�禾; 杨鹏飞; 王全东; 陈敏
Original assignee: Evaluation Argument Research Center Academy Of Military Sciences Pla China
Current assignee: Evaluation Argument Research Center Academy Of Military Sciences Pla China
Priority date: 2021-05-12
Filing date: 2021-05-12
Publication date: 2022-02-22
Anticipated expiration: 2041-05-12
Also published as: CN113268865A

Abstract

The invention discloses an aircraft behavior modeling construction method based on a rule flow chain, which comprises the steps of judging whether a task starting rule is met, judging whether an air route patrol rule is set, judging whether an airspace patrol rule is set, evaluating a target and judging whether autonomous connection is achieved. The invention has the beneficial effects that: supporting the single machine to run and execute tasks; controlling patrol of the airplane according to a designated patrol mode; according to different airspace entering rules, the attack targets can be evaluated in the task execution process, and the engagement is executed according to weapon selection rules; the weapon mount of the airplane taking off from the base to execute the task can be processed according to the weapon mount rule; the aircraft can be controlled to carry out return voyage according to a given return voyage mode: returning according to the original path, directly returning and returning by an appointed route; different airports can be selected to land according to the damage conditions of the landing airport and the standby airport.

Description

Aircraft behavior modeling construction method based on regular flow chain

Technical Field

The invention relates to an aircraft behavior modeling construction method, in particular to an aircraft behavior modeling construction method based on a rule flow chain, and belongs to the technical field of aircraft behavior modeling.

Background

When a fighter plane executes a patrol fighting task in the air, the fighter plane needs to evaluate an attack target in the task execution process and execute a battle according to a weapon selection rule; in the patrol process, when the patrol aircraft is separated from the airspace and exceeds a specified distance, commanding the assigned corresponding aircraft to carry out connection patrol; ensuring that the platform can return automatically according to the working conditions (oil shortage, ammunition shortage, faults, war damage and the like) of the platform and take over patrol by a corresponding airplane assigned by a command; the fighter can control the aircraft to carry out return voyage according to a given return voyage mode: the method comprises the steps of returning according to an original path, directly returning and returning according to an appointed route, so that before actual flight, a combat action of aerial patrol warning by using a small amount of force in a certain time and in a certain airspace needs to be simulated.

Disclosure of Invention

The invention aims to provide an aircraft behavior modeling construction method based on a rule flow chain for solving the problem.

The invention realizes the purpose through the following technical scheme: an aircraft behavior modeling construction method based on a rule flow chain comprises the following steps:

firstly, judging whether the rule 1 is met: and starting a task rule, if so, processing takeoff, and according to a rule 2: executing maneuver in a patrol mode, and carrying out the next step;

step two, judging whether a rule 3 is set: and (3) a route patrol rule, if not, directly ending, and if yes, starting a rule 6: the threat assessment rule assesses the target;

step three, judging whether a rule 4 is set: and (3) airspace patrol rules, if the airspace patrol rules are set to be 4, starting airspace patrol, and according to the rule 5: entering an airspace rule to enter a patrol airspace, judging whether to enter the airspace, if not, continuing to start the airspace patrol, and if so, starting the rule 6: the threat assessment rule assesses the target;

step four, evaluating the target according to the step two and the step three, judging whether a threat exists, if not, according to the rule 2: performing maneuver in a patrol mode, if so, performing battle treatment and performing the next step;

step five, judging whether autonomous connection exists, if not, meeting the rule 7: and finishing the task according to the rule, and if the task is autonomously jointed, according to the rule 8: processing and linking the task linking rules;

wherein the content of the first and second substances,

the rule 1: the task starting execution rule comprises the requirements of meeting the task starting time, meeting the execution task force quantity and the like;

the rule 2: the patrol modes comprise line patrol, airspace patrol and guide patrol;

the rule 3: the route patrol rule comprises a plurality of route waypoints, and each waypoint parameter comprises: number, longitude, latitude, altitude, speed;

the rule 4 is: the airspace patrol rule comprises the modes of patrolling airspace, whether a patrol route, the turning gradient and the airspace activity are calculated;

the rule 5: the entering airspace rule comprises an airspace entering mode: entering a region boundary point or entering a region nearest point or entering a region central point;

the rule 6: the threat assessment rules comprise threat assessment rules according to an attention target, threat assessment rules according to an attention area, threat assessment rules according to battlefield space, threat assessment rules according to the distance between the attention target and threat assessment rules according to the motion state of the target;

the rule 7: the task ending rule comprises ending the task before returning the voyage or ending the task after the return voyage is finished, a return voyage mode and a return voyage airport;

the rule 8: the task connection rule comprises a single patrol duration, a connection distance of a center of a separation area, an airspace patrol connection mode and a task execution duration low limit.

As a still further scheme of the invention: in the fourth step, the fighting treatment comprises the following procedures:

A. firstly, judging whether the task parameters pass the inspection, if not, directly ending the inspection, if so, entering a task resetting execution stage and a target selection stage, and according to a rule 9: the target selection rule is used for selecting a target, if the target list is empty, the target selection is finished directly, and if the target list is not empty, the next step is carried out;

B. judging whether the target selection is successful, if not, re-selecting the target, if so, switching to a navigation stage, informing a lower-level processing target to the navigation target, judging whether the navigation is successful, if not, judging whether the navigation is overtime, and if so, carrying out the next step;

if the judgment result is that the navigation is overtime, the battle fails, the operation is directly finished, and if the judgment result is not overtime, the lower-level processing target is notified to the navigation target again;

C. and switching to a fighting stage, controlling the fire control radar to start, and according to a rule 10: weapon mount rule order weapon, and judge whether rule 11 is satisfied: and (4) weapon firing rules, if not, according to the rule 10 again: ordering weapons according to weapon mounting rules, and if so, carrying out the next step;

D. determine whether rule 12 is satisfied: the fighting rule is that if the fighting rule is not met, whether the fighting is overtime is judged, if the fighting rule is not met, the locking stage is switched to, the target is locked through the fire control radar, and the next step is carried out;

wherein, for judging whether the fighting is overtime, if yes, the fighting fails, and the process is directly ended, if no, the operation is repeated according to the rule 10: ordering weapons according to weapon mounting rules;

F. determine whether rule 13 is satisfied: locking the target rule, if not, judging whether the locking is overtime, if so, switching to a launching stage, launching the weapon according to the weapon launching rule, monitoring the explosion situation of the weapon after successful launching, and evaluating the fighting result;

and if not, locking the target again through the fire control radar.

As a still further scheme of the invention:

the rule 9: the target selection rule comprises selecting a target closest to the target, selecting a target with the highest speed, selecting a certain type of target, selecting a target close to the target, and the like;

the rule 10: the weapon mounting rule comprises weapon type and weapon quantity;

the rule 11: the weapon firing rules comprise firing different weapons for different targets, the number of weapons fired per time, whether to fire multiple times, firing intervals;

the rule 12: the engagement rules comprise maximum weapon, minimum engagement range, maximum engagement quantity, engagement preparation time and the like;

the rule 13: the target locking rules include search relock time, maximum lock time, etc.

As a still further scheme of the invention: the assessment engagement comprises the following processes:

A. judging whether the explosion situation of the weapon is monitored, if not, directly ending, and if so, carrying out the next step;

B. judging whether the weapons in flight explode completely, if not, judging whether the explosion situation of the weapons is monitored again, if so, according to a rule 14: evaluating the fighting result by the evaluation rule, and carrying out the next step;

C. and judging whether the target is destroyed, if not, failing the engagement, and if so, succeeding the engagement.

As a still further scheme of the invention: the rule 14: the evaluation rule includes how often the target reliability or availability is below as being destroyed.

The invention has the beneficial effects that: the aircraft behavior modeling construction method based on the regular flow chain is reasonable in design and supports single-machine operation and task execution; controlling patrol of the airplane according to a designated patrol mode; according to different airspace entering rules, supporting the entering of an airspace central point, the entering of an airspace point sequence number and the entering of an airspace closest point; different airspace maneuvering modes in fixed airspace: inner 8-shaped, outer 8-shaped, clockwise runway type, anticlockwise runway type, regional sideline flight and the like; the attack targets can be evaluated in the task execution process, and the engagement is executed according to the weapon selection rule; the airspace exit point can be calculated according to the airspace point serial number; the activity duration (multi-batch task connection) of the patrol plane in the patrol area can be determined according to the single-batch patrol duration, and the take-off time of the patrol plane in the next batch can be determined; the total time of the patrol task and the flying of the airplane executing the patrol task in the airspace can be determined according to the patrol total time; in the patrol process, when the patrol aircraft is separated from the airspace and exceeds a specified distance, commanding the assigned corresponding aircraft to carry out connection patrol; the system can automatically return to the air according to the working conditions (oil shortage, ammunition shortage, faults, war damage and the like) of the platform, and take the corresponding airplane assigned to take over for patrol; the opportunity of enemy evaluation and fighting of the airplane executing patrol can be appointed-entering airspace or starting a task; the engagement simulates: searching, catching enemies, attacking and quitting the battle; the airplane is supported to implement air combat tactical actions in active and passive situations; active situation tactics are provided: performing positive robbery; interference is attacked strongly; the method comprises the following steps of: maneuvering counterattack; interference counterattack; the airplane can be supported to implement evasive actions according to real-time situations (the airplane is locked or attacked) of a battlefield; the weapon mount of the airplane taking off from the base to execute the task can be processed according to the weapon mount rule; the aircraft can be controlled to carry out return voyage according to a given return voyage mode: returning according to the original path, directly returning and returning by an appointed route; different airports can be selected to land according to the damage conditions of the landing airport and the standby airport.

Drawings

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a main process of an aerial patrol combat mission according to the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a battle treatment process according to the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a schematic view of the assessment engagement process according to the present invention.

Detailed Description

The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.

Example one

Referring to fig. 1 to 3, a method for modeling aircraft behavior based on a rule flow chain includes the following steps:

step three, judging whether a rule 4 is set: and (3) airspace patrol rules, if the airspace patrol rules are set, starting airspace patrol, and according to the rule 5: entering an airspace rule to enter a patrol airspace, judging whether to enter the airspace, if not, continuing to start the airspace patrol, and if so, starting the rule 6: the threat assessment rule assesses the target;

wherein the content of the first and second substances,

Further, in the embodiment of the present invention, in the fourth step, the engagement processing includes the following processes:

D. determine whether rule 12 is satisfied: the fighting rule is that if yes, the locking stage is switched to, the target is locked through the fire control radar, and the next step is carried out; if not, judging whether the battle is overtime or not;

G. determine whether rule 13 is satisfied: locking the target rule, if not, judging whether the locking is overtime, if so, switching to a launching stage, launching the weapon according to the weapon launching rule, monitoring the explosion situation of the weapon after successful launching, and evaluating the fighting result;

and if not, locking the target again through the fire control radar.

Further, in the embodiment of the present invention:

Further, in the embodiment of the present invention, the evaluating engagement includes the following processes:

Further, in the embodiment of the present invention, the rule 14: the evaluation rule includes how often the target reliability or availability is below as being destroyed.

Example two

A method for building aircraft behavior modeling based on a rule flow chain comprises the steps of firstly checking whether each rule is effective and reasonable in setting before simulation operation, including whether a threat assessment rule is set; if the airspace maneuver is selected, whether an effective airspace is set or not is judged; if the autonomous connection is set, the distance from the airspace entry point to the airspace central point needs to be checked, and if the distance is greater than the connection distance from the airspace central point, a warning is reported; if a task route exists, an airspace entry point must be set; if the autonomous calculation patrol route is not selected, an airspace maneuvering route must be set; when the airspace entering mode is boundary point entering, considering whether the airspace entering point and the airspace exiting point are effective or not; if an airline maneuver is selected, a mission route must be set, etc. A combat aircraft must be equipped with a fire control radar. After the check is passed, the simulation is started, and the fighter plane starts to carry out patrol tasks after taking off from the airport.

The maneuvering patrol process in the airspace:

1. acquiring the control right of the maneuvering assembly of the combat aircraft;

2. issuing a maneuvering control instruction according to an airspace patrol rule, and if an autonomous calculation route is set in the airspace patrol rule, the fighter plane can enter the airspace from an airspace central point, a certain boundary point of the airspace or the closest point to the boundary of the airspace, wherein maneuvering patterns in the airspace comprise 8 words inside a tangent line, 8 words outside the tangent line, clockwise tangent line double 180, anticlockwise tangent line double 180, flying along a side line, 8 words inside, 8 words outside, clockwise double 180, anticlockwise double 180, a trapezoid, patrol and a line type, and one of the maneuvering patterns is selected as a moving mode of the plane in the region. If the airspace patrol rule is set with an involuntary calculation route, maneuvering according to the set airspace patrol route.

The maneuver patrol process along the route:

2. maneuvering the airline according to the mission parameters.

Target evaluation, engagement treatment:

1. resetting a task execution phase;

2. starting a target selection phase;

3. and acquiring effective Track information on the fighter aircraft, and if the effective Track information meets threat assessment rules and has the capability of processing the target, adding the effective Track information to a target list and reporting to a command post.

4. And sequencing the targets in the target list, and preferentially processing the targets with high priority and short distance.

5. And selecting weapons for the targets according to the weapon launching rules, and generating target engagement information after the weapons are successfully selected.

6. The target is set as the primary target of the combat aircraft and switched to the navigation phase.

7. And maneuvering towards the target until the target is within the fighting range and angle of the fighting aircraft carrying the weapon, and then successfully navigating.

8. And switching to a fighting stage after the navigation is successful, controlling the fire control radar to start, and ordering the weapon according to the weapon emission rule. And judging whether the weapon meets the engagement rule.

9. And switching to a locking stage, and locking the target by the fire control radar after the target locking rule is met.

10. And switching to a launching phase, and launching the weapon according to the weapon launching rule.

11. And after the weapon is successfully fired, monitoring the explosion situation of the weapon, and if all the weapons in flight explode, evaluating the engagement result according to the evaluation rule.

12. If the target is destroyed, the engagement succeeds.

13. And if the mission connection is not set, the fighter plane finishes the mission and performs return voyage. If the task join is set, the join is processed.

Return journey after task

1. If the airspace exit point exists, maneuvering to the airspace exit point;

2. if no airspace exit point exists, finding an exit point on the route;

if there is no exit point, exit is performed toward the airport according to the current position.

It will be evident to those skilled in the art that the invention is not limited to the details of the foregoing illustrative embodiments, and that the present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential attributes thereof. The present embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein. Any reference sign in a claim should not be construed as limiting the claim concerned.

Furthermore, it should be understood that although the present description refers to embodiments, not every embodiment may contain only a single embodiment, and such description is for clarity only, and those skilled in the art should integrate the description, and the embodiments may be combined as appropriate to form other embodiments understood by those skilled in the art.

Claims

1. A method for modeling and constructing aircraft behavior based on a regular flow chain is characterized by comprising the following steps: the method comprises the following steps:

step three, judging whether a rule 4 is set: and (3) airspace patrol rules, if the rule 4 is set, starting airspace patrol, and according to the rule 5: entering an airspace rule, entering a patrol airspace, judging whether to enter the airspace, if not, continuing to start the airspace patrol, and if the airspace is entered, starting the rule 6: the threat assessment rule assesses the target;

in the fourth step, the fighting treatment comprises the following procedures:

B. judging whether the target selection is successful, if not, re-selecting the target, if so, switching to a navigation stage, informing the navigation target of a lower-level processing target, judging whether the navigation is successful, if not, judging whether the navigation is overtime, and if so, performing the next step;

E. determine whether rule 13 is satisfied: locking the target rule, if so, switching to a launching stage, launching the weapon according to the weapon launching rule, monitoring the explosion situation of the weapon after successful launching, and evaluating the engagement result; if not, judging whether the locking is overtime or not;

if the locking is overtime, the fighting fails and is directly ended, and if the locking is not overtime, the target is locked again through the fire control radar;

wherein the content of the first and second substances,

the rule 1: the task starting execution rule comprises the requirements of meeting the task starting time and the requirement of executing the force quantity of the task;

the rule 8: the task connection rule comprises a single patrol duration, a connection distance of a center of a separation area, an airspace patrol connection mode and a task execution duration low limit;

the rule 9: the target selection rule comprises selecting a target closest to the target, selecting a target with the highest speed and selecting a target close to the target;

the rule 12: the engagement rules comprise maximum weapon, minimum engagement range, maximum engagement quantity and engagement preparation time;

the rule 13: the target locking rule comprises search relock time and maximum locking time.

2. The method for modeling and constructing aircraft behavior based on the rule flow chain according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises the following steps: the assessment engagement comprises the following processes:

B. judging whether the weapons in flight are all exploded, if not, judging whether the explosion situation of the weapons is monitored again, and if so, according to a rule 14: evaluating the fighting result by the evaluation rule, and carrying out the next step;

3. The method for modeling and constructing aircraft behavior based on the rule flow chain according to claim 2, wherein the method comprises the following steps: the rule 14: the evaluation rule includes that the target reliability or availability is destroyed if it is below a certain value.