CN113240273B

CN113240273B - Code-configurable-based enterprise ESG index determination method and related products

Info

Publication number: CN113240273B
Application number: CN202110520152.4A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 诸世卓; 陈寅杰
Original assignee: Ping An Technology Shenzhen Co Ltd
Current assignee: Ping An Technology Shenzhen Co Ltd
Priority date: 2021-05-12
Filing date: 2021-05-12
Publication date: 2024-04-19
Anticipated expiration: 2041-05-12
Also published as: CN113240273A

Abstract

The embodiment of the application provides a code-configurable-based method for determining an ESG index of an enterprise and related products. The method comprises the following steps: crawling the disclosure data of the enterprise to be evaluated under the evaluation index A through an application program interface; carrying out structuring treatment on the disclosure data under the evaluation index A according to a preset data structure corresponding to the evaluation index A to obtain at least one piece of structuring data; configuring a target evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item in at least one evaluation item according to at least one piece of structured data; determining ESG indexes of at least one evaluation item according to the target evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item and at least one piece of structured data; determining ESG indexes of enterprises to be evaluated according to the ESG indexes of at least one evaluation item; and sending the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated to the target equipment, so that a user of the target equipment makes a decision related to the enterprise to be evaluated according to the ESG index pair of the enterprise to be evaluated.

Description

Code-configurable-based enterprise ESG index determination method and related products

Technical Field

The application relates to the technical field of data processing, in particular to a code-configurable-based enterprise ESG index determination method and related products.

Background

ESG evaluation of an enterprise is a comprehensive evaluation of the environment (Environmen, abbreviated as E), society (S), and administration (Governance, abbreviated as G) of the enterprise. Internationally and domestically have accumulated some successful experience in evaluating enterprise ESG performance, internationally well known rating institutions such as MSCI, FTSE, etc. have established respective evaluation criteria and performed ESG evaluations for internationally well known enterprises. With the importance of international society, such as various investment institutions and governments, on enterprise responsibility, particularly with recent progress of global climate change cooperation, and the realization of carbon peak in China internationally by 2030, the promise of carbon neutralization in 2060, there is also a great deal of demand for the evaluation of enterprises in ESG by domestic investors and governments.

However, the existing ESG evaluation process of an enterprise is still mainly performed manually, for example, an enterprise is scored in each evaluation dimension by manually reading a great deal of disclosure reports and related news of the enterprise, so as to obtain an ESG score of the enterprise.

Therefore, the current ESG evaluation relies on manual evaluation, resulting in slow evaluation efficiency and strong subjectivity.

Disclosure of Invention

The embodiment of the application provides a code-configurable-based enterprise ESG index determination method and related products, which realize automatic ESG evaluation of enterprises to be evaluated through structural processing and invocation of evaluation codes, improve ESG evaluation efficiency, avoid subjective problems caused by manual evaluation and improve decision making precision.

In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a method for determining an ESG index of an enterprise based on configurable codes, including:

crawling the disclosure data of an enterprise to be evaluated under an evaluation index A through an application program interface, wherein the evaluation index A is any one of a plurality of evaluation indexes for carrying out ESG evaluation on the enterprise to be evaluated;

Carrying out structuring treatment on the disclosure data under the evaluation index A according to a preset data structure corresponding to the evaluation index A to obtain at least one piece of structured data, wherein the at least one piece of structured data corresponds to at least one evaluation item under the evaluation index A one by one;

Configuring a target evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item in the at least one evaluation item according to the at least one piece of structured data;

Determining an ESG index of the at least one evaluation item according to the target evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item and the at least one piece of structured data;

Determining the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the ESG index of the at least one evaluation item;

And sending the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated to target equipment, so that a user of the target equipment makes a decision related to the enterprise to be evaluated according to the ESG index pair of the enterprise to be evaluated.

In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides an apparatus for determining an ESG index of an enterprise, including:

An acquisition unit, configured to acquire, through an application program interface, disclosure data of an enterprise to be evaluated under an evaluation index a, where the evaluation index a is any one of a plurality of evaluation indexes used for performing ESG evaluation on the enterprise to be evaluated;

The processing unit is used for carrying out structuring processing on the disclosure data under the evaluation index A according to a preset data structure corresponding to the evaluation index A to obtain at least one piece of structured data, wherein the at least one piece of structured data corresponds to at least one evaluation item under the evaluation index A one by one; configuring a target evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item in the at least one evaluation item according to the at least one piece of structured data; determining an ESG index of the at least one evaluation item according to the target evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item and the at least one piece of structured data; determining the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the ESG index of the at least one evaluation item;

And the sending unit is used for sending the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated to the target equipment so that a user of the target equipment makes a decision related to the enterprise to be evaluated according to the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated.

In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides an electronic device, including: and a processor connected to a memory for storing a computer program, the processor being configured to execute the computer program stored in the memory, to cause the electronic device to perform the method according to the first aspect.

In a fourth aspect, embodiments of the present application provide a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program that causes a computer to perform the method according to the first aspect.

In a fifth aspect, embodiments of the present application provide a computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing a computer program, the computer being operable to cause a computer to perform the method according to the first aspect.

The embodiment of the application has the following beneficial effects:

It can be seen that, in the embodiment of the present application, a data structure is set for each evaluation index, and the disclosure data under each evaluation index is converted into structured data; then, according to the structured data of each evaluation index, configuring a target evaluation code for the evaluation item under each evaluation index; therefore, the target evaluation code can be called to automatically perform ESG evaluation for the evaluation item to obtain an ESG index of the evaluation item, and further the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated is obtained, so that the ESG evaluation of the enterprise is completed based on data structuring and code calling, manual evaluation is not needed, and the evaluation efficiency is improved. Because of automatic evaluation, the method is relatively objective, and solves the subjectivity problem caused by manual evaluation, so that the decision making precision based on the ESG index is higher.

Drawings

In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present application, the drawings required for the description of the embodiments will be briefly described below, and it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are some embodiments of the present application, and other drawings may be obtained according to these drawings without inventive effort for a person skilled in the art.

Fig. 1 is a schematic flow chart of a code-based configurable method for determining an ESG index of an enterprise according to an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a method for determining weights of evaluation indexes according to an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 3 is a schematic flow chart of a data complement method according to an embodiment of the present application;

fig. 4 is a functional unit composition block diagram of an enterprise ESG index determination device according to an embodiment of the present application;

fig. 5 is a schematic structural diagram of an enterprise ESG index determination apparatus according to an embodiment of the present application.

Detailed Description

The following description of the embodiments of the present application will be made clearly and fully with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which it is evident that the embodiments described are some, but not all embodiments of the application. All other embodiments, which can be made by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments of the application without making any inventive effort, are intended to be within the scope of the application.

The terms "first," "second," "third," and "fourth" and the like in the description and in the claims and drawings are used for distinguishing between different objects and not necessarily for describing a particular sequential or chronological order. Furthermore, the terms "comprise" and "have," as well as any variations thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion. For example, a process, method, system, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of steps or elements is not limited to only those listed steps or elements but may include other steps or elements not listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus.

Reference herein to "an embodiment" means that a particular feature, result, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment may be included in at least one embodiment of the application. The appearances of such phrases in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments mutually exclusive of other embodiments. Those of skill in the art will explicitly and implicitly appreciate that the embodiments described herein may be combined with other embodiments.

First, the enterprise ESG indexes, that is, the enterprise ESG evaluations, according to the embodiments of the present application are the same in nature, and are not distinguished later. Correspondingly, ESG evaluation is carried out on the enterprise to obtain ESG indexes of the enterprise, namely, ESG evaluation is carried out on the ESG to obtain ESG evaluation of the enterprise.

Referring to fig. 1, fig. 1 is a flow chart of a code-configurable-based method for determining an ESG index of an enterprise according to an embodiment of the present application. The method comprises the following steps:

101: and crawling the disclosure data of the enterprise to be evaluated under an evaluation index A through an application program interface, wherein the evaluation index A is any one of a plurality of evaluation indexes for carrying out ESG evaluation on the enterprise to be evaluated.

For example, the enterprise evaluation device may obtain enterprise data of the enterprise to be evaluated from a third party application, where the enterprise data may be public information of the enterprise to be evaluated, where the public information includes annual social responsibility reports, annual reports, semi-annual reports, quaternary reports, official websites, company announcements, and the like; or environmental protection punishment information, wherein the information sources are mainly environmental protection punishment notices of the environmental protection authorities in the country and various places for enterprises and financial punishment notices of various supervision units; or negative information of the environment, the society and the management three dimensions, and the information sources mainly wait for evaluating negative news reports of enterprises on each main stream medium. Then, the disclosure data of the enterprise to be evaluated under the evaluation index A is obtained based on the enterprise data.

Accordingly, the enterprise evaluation apparatus acquires enterprise data of the enterprise to be evaluated through an application program interface (Application Programming Interface, API) opened by the third party application, for example, acquires news disclosure of the enterprise to be evaluated from the news platform, and then acquires disclosure data of the enterprise to be evaluated under the evaluation index A from the news disclosure, for example, acquires disclosure data of the enterprise to be evaluated under the evaluation index A from the news disclosure through A natural language processing (Natural Language Processing, NLP) technique.

The evaluation index a may be any one of the evaluation index sets. The set of evaluation indicators includes evaluation indicators for a plurality of evaluation dimensions. Specifically, for enterprise ESG evaluation, at least one evaluation index may be set in the E dimension, the S dimension, and the G dimension, respectively. In general, there are qualitative and quantitative evaluation indicators for each evaluation dimension. For example, quantitative evaluation metrics in the E dimension include, but are not limited to: the carbon emission per person, the electricity consumption per person and the water consumption per person are evaluated qualitatively, and the evaluation indexes include but are not limited to: whether there is an energy saving measure or not and whether there is an energy saving management system; quantitative evaluation indexes in the S dimension include, but are not limited to: the qualitative evaluation indexes of employee welfare, coverage of annuity and participation of annual final prize control are not limited to: whether there are equity incentive plans and work injury pay standards; quantitative evaluation indexes in the G dimension include, but are not limited to: stakeholder distribution, qualitative rating indicators include, but are not limited to: the protection system of the middle and small stakeholders and the situation that the big stakeholders become derated, the perfect board architecture, the board length and the CEO are the same person or not.

102: And the enterprise carries out structuring treatment on the disclosure data under the evaluation index A according to a preset data structure corresponding to the evaluation index A to obtain at least one piece of structured data, wherein the at least one piece of structured data corresponds to at least one evaluation item under the evaluation index A one by one.

Illustratively, the data structure of each evaluation index is predefined. Since there may be a plurality of evaluation items under each evaluation index that need to participate in the ESG evaluation, and each evaluation item may require a plurality of fields to be clearly described. Accordingly, the data structure shown in table 1 can be set for the evaluation index a:

table 1:

index_code

data_label_1

data_label_2

data_label_3

data_text

data_digit

Evaluation item 1

Evaluation item 2

Evaluation item n

As shown in table 1, the data structure of the evaluation index a includes a first field index_code, at least one second field, i.e., fields data_label_1, data_label_2, data_label_3, a third field data_text, and a fourth field data_digit. The first field index_code is used for indicating the identification of the evaluation index, and the at least one second field is used for indicating the identification of the evaluation item of the evaluation index; when the evaluation item of the evaluation index is a qualitative evaluation item, the third field data_text is used for indicating the evaluation content of the evaluation item, and the fourth field data_digit is set to be empty; when the evaluation item of the evaluation index is a quantitative evaluation item, the fourth field data_digit is used for indicating quantitative data of the evaluation item, and the third field data_text is set to be empty.

It should be understood that, after the disclosure data of the evaluation index a is structured according to the data structure shown in table 1, the value of each piece of structured data in the obtained at least one piece of structured data under each field is referred to as an attribute value of the piece of structured data under each field.

In one embodiment of the present application, as shown in table 2, the data structure corresponding to the evaluation index a may further include the following optional fields: field company_id, field rl_second_level_indication, field data_source, field model_version, field remark, and field data_day.

Table 2:

The field company_id is used for indicating the identity of enterprises, and the field attribute value is mainly used for indicating which enterprise each structured data belongs to when the enterprise data of a plurality of enterprises are structured; the field rl_second_level_index is used for indicating the industry level to which the enterprise belongs; a field data_source is used to indicate the source of enterprise data for the enterprise; a field model_version is used to indicate the item version; a field remark is used for a flag for each piece of structured data, i.e., similar to a remark; the field data_day is used to indicate the time, i.e., the attribute value of the field data_day is used to indicate the date of disclosure of the enterprise data.

In one embodiment of the present application, the bullets data_label_1, data_label_2 and data_label_3 may or may not have a hierarchical relationship, and need to be determined according to the specific type of the evaluation item. For example, when the evaluation item is a winning, the data_label_1 is used for recording that the evaluation item is a winning, and the data_label_2 is used for indicating that the evaluation item is a national prize, that is, that the attribute value of the data_label_1 has a hierarchical relationship with the attribute value of the data_label_2.

It should be noted that the design of a plurality of second fields is only an exemplary illustration, and that a larger or smaller number of second fields may be designed in practical applications. In addition, for the case where the evaluation item needs a plurality of second fields to be described, one second field description may be used as well, by describing the evaluation item in one second field by way of hierarchical description. For example, data_label_1 may be directly used to indicate that the evaluation item is a winning prize and a national prize. Of course, for the case where only one second field description is required for one evaluation item, the redundant second field may be left empty.

It should be noted that the above-mentioned references to a field, i.e., an attribute value of the field is set to "NULL".

The process of structuring enterprise data of an enterprise to be evaluated is described below by means of tables 3 and 4:

table 3: the enterprise data is structured by a second field.

As shown in table 3, based on the definition of the data structure, the identification of the enterprise to be evaluated is known from the above structured data: 12137736, the industry level of the enterprise to be evaluated is: the printing industry, the identification of evaluation index is: 15 th evaluation index under G dimension, wherein the evaluation item under the evaluation index is indicated by a first second field, the evaluation item is length, the second field and a third second field are empty, namely the value is NULL, and the quantitative value of the evaluation item is: 3.1, qualitatively evaluating a NULL; the sources of data for the enterprise to be evaluated are: raw_fr_directors; the project version is: 1.0; remarks remark are: empty (NULL), the date of disclosure of the data of the enterprise to be evaluated is: 2020-08-26.

Table 4: the enterprise data is structured with a plurality of second fields.

As shown in table 4, based on the definition of the data structure, the identification of the enterprise to be evaluated is known from the above structured data: 140485480, the industry level of the enterprise to be evaluated is: general purpose special equipment manufacturing; the identification of the evaluation index is as follows: s121, namely the 121 th evaluation index in the S dimension; the evaluation items under the evaluation index are represented by three second fields, namely, the evaluation items are indicated to be winning, and the prize-saving prize is obtained, namely, the third prize of science and technology in Zhejiang province is obtained; the qualitative evaluation content is as follows: a uniform effort by the personnel of scientific research, technology, etc. to win a prize; the quantitative content is empty; the sources of data for the enterprise to be evaluated are: raw_fr_directors; the project version is: 1.0; the remarks are: NULL, the date of disclosure of the data of the enterprise to be evaluated is: 2019-07-26.

It should be understood that, although the evaluation item of each evaluation index is predefined, if the disclosure data of a certain evaluation item is not currently acquired, the structured data corresponding to that evaluation item is missing, and it can be understood that the structured data corresponding to that evaluation item is not structured.

That is, a plurality of evaluation items are predefined in the data structure of each evaluation index, and if the currently acquired data of a certain evaluation item is not disclosed in the disclosure data of the enterprise to be evaluated under the evaluation index, no structuring processing is performed on the evaluation item, and no structuring data corresponding to the evaluation item exists. Or the data of the evaluation item is complemented by a data complement mode, and then the data of the evaluation item is subjected to structuring treatment to obtain the structured data of the evaluation item. The data completion process is described in detail later and will not be described in detail here.

Further, for the disclosure data under each evaluation index, identifying the disclosure data under each evaluation index by using an NLP technology to obtain related data of the evaluation item under each evaluation index, and carrying out structuring processing on the related data of each evaluation item based on the defined data structure, namely assigning the value of each evaluation item under each field to the field to obtain the structuring data corresponding to each evaluation item.

It should be appreciated that there may be multiple disclosures for each rating item, for example, the enterprise data of the enterprise to be rated includes the disclosures of the rating item at N historic times, however, only one disclosure may be required when performing ESG ratings on the enterprise. Therefore, the disclosure data of the N historical moments can be integrated, for example, averaged, and one disclosure data obtained after fusion is structured to obtain structured data corresponding to the evaluation item.

103: And configuring a target evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item in the at least one evaluation item according to the at least one piece of structured data.

Illustratively, currently, all evaluation indexes have 12 kinds of evaluation rules in total. For example, for a quantitative evaluation index, the evaluation rule is: ESG evaluation is carried out according to the industry ranking; for another example, for a qualitative evaluation index, the evaluation rule is: and whether the corresponding description exists or not to carry out ESG evaluation.

A generic evaluation code is therefore compiled for each of these 12 evaluation rules in advance.

Generally, the evaluation rules can be divided into two main categories, one is a qualitative evaluation rule and the other is a quantitative evaluation rule. In general, quantitative evaluation rules have different meanings based on quantitative data, and the corresponding evaluation methods are different, so that quantitative evaluation rules are relatively more.

For example, the following generic evaluation codes may be compiled for industry-ranked evaluation rules:

{“index_code@data_label”：{

“[0，25)”：1，

“[25，50)”：2，

“[50，75)”：3，

“[75，100)”：4

}

The index_code is a first parameter in the code and used for indicating the identification of the evaluation index, and the data_label is a second parameter in the code and used for indicating the identification of the evaluation item under the evaluation index. "[0, 25)": 1 is used for indicating that when the evaluation item has a value, namely the industry rank is between 0 and 25), the ESG index of the evaluation item data_label is 1; analogically, "[25, 50)": 2,"[50, 75)": 3,"[75, 100)": 4 indicates ESG indexes 2, 3, 4, respectively.

It should be noted that the universality of the code is shown in that the first reference index_code and the second data_label do not give specific values. When performing ESG evaluation on a specific evaluation index, if the evaluation rule of a certain evaluation item in the evaluation index is to perform ESG evaluation through industry ranking, only the code is required to be called, the first parameter index_code and the second parameter_label are endowed with values corresponding to the evaluation index, namely, a target evaluation code corresponding to the evaluation item under the evaluation index is configured, and the evaluation item is subjected to ESG evaluation through the target evaluation code, so that the ESG index of the evaluation item is obtained.

For qualitative evaluation, the evaluation mode is that if the corresponding disclosure exists, a score is given, and if the disclosure does not exist, a score of 0 is given. Thus, for the evaluation rule of such qualitative evaluation, the following general evaluation code can be defined:

{“index_code@data_label”：1}

Wherein index_code is the identification of the evaluation index, data_label is the identification of the evaluation item of the evaluation index, "index_code@data_label":1 indicates that if there is a description of an evaluation item in the evaluation index indicated by "index_code@data_label", the evaluation item is scored.

Likewise, the code versatility is shown in that the first parameter input_code and the second parameter input data_label do not give specific values. When performing ESG evaluation on a specific evaluation index, if the evaluation rule of a certain evaluation item in the evaluation index is to perform ESG evaluation through industry ranking, only the code is required to be called, a target evaluation code corresponding to the evaluation item under the evaluation index is configured by giving a value corresponding to the evaluation index to the first input index_code and the second data_label, and the evaluation item is subjected to ESG evaluation through the target evaluation code, so that the ESG index of the evaluation item is obtained.

Therefore, a general evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation rule may be configured in advance for the evaluation rule, and no parameter is assigned in the general evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation rule.

Thus, an evaluation rule of each evaluation item in the evaluation index a is acquired; calling configured general evaluation codes corresponding to each evaluation item according to the evaluation rule of each evaluation item in the evaluation index A; and assigning the parameters in the general evaluation codes corresponding to each evaluation item according to at least one piece of structured data to obtain the target evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item. Specifically, a first entry parameter in the general evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item is assigned to be an attribute value of a first field in the structured data corresponding to each evaluation item, and a second entry parameter in the general evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item is assigned to be an attribute value of a second field of the target, so that a target evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item is obtained; the target second field is a second field used for participating in ESG evaluation in at least one second field in the structured data corresponding to each evaluation item. Since each evaluation item may be described by a plurality of second fields, but the second fields for participating in the ESG evaluation may be only a part, for example, the evaluation item described in table 4 above is a winning case, the evaluation items are described by three second fields, and when the ESG evaluation is actually performed, only the attribute value of the first second field may be needed, that is, whether there is a winning record in the first second field, and if there is a winning record, a score is scored, so as to complete the ESG evaluation on the evaluation item. Therefore, according to the evaluation rule of each evaluation item, determining the target second field in at least one second field corresponding to each evaluation item, and assigning the attribute value of the target second field to the second input parameter. And after the assignment of the first entering parameters and the second entering parameters is completed, obtaining the target evaluation codes corresponding to each evaluation item.

104: And determining the ESG index of the at least one evaluation item according to the target evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item and the at least one piece of structured data.

For example, since the first entry and the second entry in the target evaluation code under each evaluation item have specific values, the specific value (i.e. callback) of the second entry may be determined from the structured data corresponding to each evaluation item through the target evaluation code under each evaluation item. Specifically, according to the assignment of the first entry and the assignment of the second entry in the target evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item, determining the structured data corresponding to each evaluation item in at least one piece of structured data, namely according to the assignment of the first parameter and the assignment of the second parameter, and taking the attribute values of the first field and the second field in at least one piece of structured data, the assignment of the first parameter and the assignment of the second parameter as the structured data corresponding to each evaluation item; then, from the structured data corresponding to each evaluation item, a parameter value of a second entry in the target evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item is acquired. Specifically, when the second parameter is the quantitative evaluation item, the attribute value of the fourth field in the structured data, that is, the attribute value of data_ didit, may be used as the parameter value of the second parameter; and when the second entry is a qualitative rating, taking the attribute value of the third field in the structured data, namely the attribute value of the data_text, as the parameter value of the second entry. Further, after the parameter value of the second parameter is obtained, executing the target evaluation code of each evaluation item to obtain an ESG index of each evaluation item; and finally, according to the ESG indexes of each evaluation item, obtaining the ESG index of at least one evaluation item, namely, integrating, such as weighting, the ESG index of each evaluation item to obtain the ESG index of at least one evaluation item.

It should be noted that there may be a plurality of qualitative ratings and/or a plurality of quantitative ratings for one rating. Therefore, if the evaluation rules corresponding to the two evaluation items in one evaluation index are the same, the common evaluation code corresponding to the evaluation rule can be multiplexed. For example, if there are a plurality of qualitative evaluation items under one evaluation index, a general code corresponding to the qualitative evaluation can be multiplexed to complete the ESG evaluation of the evaluation index.

The ESG evaluation process for the evaluation item under the evaluation index a will be described below taking the evaluation index a as a quantitative evaluation index and a qualitative evaluation index as examples, respectively.

Quantitative evaluation:

The evaluation index A is the electricity consumption density, and the evaluation item under the evaluation index A is the electricity consumption per capita, so after the general evaluation code call is completed, the first input parameter and the second input parameter in the general evaluation code can be assigned to obtain the following target evaluation code:

{“E012@density”：{

“[0，25)”：1，

“[25，50)”：2，

“[50，75)”：3，

“[75，100)”：4

}

Wherein E012 is the identification of the evaluation index "electricity consumption density", and density is the identification of the evaluation item "electricity consumption by people" under the evaluation index "electricity consumption density".

It can be seen that, in the ESG evaluation process of the "average power consumption of people", the structured data corresponding to the "average power consumption of people" is obtained from the at least one structured data through the identifier "E012" of the power consumption density and the identifier "density" of the "average power consumption of people", and then, the attribute value of the fourth field data_ didit of the structured data is used as the parameter value of the second parameter, that is, the ranking of the average power consumption of people of the enterprise to be evaluated in the industry. And determining the ESG index of the evaluation item based on the parameter value of the second entry. For example, if the average power consumption of the person of the enterprise to be evaluated is ranked 30 in the industry, it is determined that the ESG score of the enterprise to be evaluated under the condition that the evaluation item is "average power consumption of the person" is 2 points.

Qualitative evaluation:

For example, for the evaluation index a being "energy consumption disclosure", and there are a plurality of qualitative evaluation items, for example, the plurality of evaluation items are respectively "whether there is disclosure of energy usage", "whether there is a target describing energy saving", "whether there is a quantitative target describing energy saving", "whether there is a measure qualitatively describing energy saving", "whether there is quantitative measure effect data", "whether there is a management system describing energy saving", and for the plurality of qualitative evaluation items, the evaluation rules are as follows: the score is 1 when there is a corresponding description, and 0 when there is no corresponding description. Therefore, for the plurality of qualitative scores, after the above-described general-purpose evaluation codes corresponding to qualitative scores are called and multiplexed, target evaluation codes corresponding to a plurality of evaluation items can be obtained as follows, respectively:

{“E003@disclosed”：1，

“E003@goal_”：1

“E003@quantity_goal_”：1

“E003@certified”：1

“E003@action”：1

“E003@action_result”：1

“E003@management”：1，

}

,"E003e@disclosed"：1,"E003@goal_"：1"E003@quantity_goal_"：1,"E003@certified"：1,"E003@action"：1,"E003_@action_result"：1,"E003@management"：1, are used to perform ESG evaluation on "whether there is a disclosure of energy usage", "whether there is a goal describing energy saving", "whether there is a quantitative goal describing energy saving", "whether there is a measure qualitatively describing energy saving", "whether there is quantitative measure effect data", "whether there is a management system describing energy saving", respectively. And determining the structured data corresponding to each evaluation item according to the assignment of the first entry parameter and the second entry parameter in each evaluation item, if a corresponding description exists in a certain evaluation item, scoring the evaluation item, and otherwise, setting zero for the score of the evaluation item.

It can be seen that the above-described manner of configuring the code is based on the essence of the evaluation rules, and a general evaluation code is written for each evaluation rule. Thus, 12 general evaluation codes are only required to be written for 12 evaluation rules, and when each evaluation index is subjected to ESG evaluation, the corresponding general evaluation code is only required to be called according to the type of the evaluation index, so that the ESG evaluation of the evaluation index can be completed. Therefore, when ESG evaluation is carried out on a plurality of evaluation indexes, corresponding evaluation codes do not need to be written for each evaluation index, redundancy of the codes is reduced, and grading efficiency is improved. In addition, from the essence of the evaluation rule, when a new evaluation rule appears subsequently, a section of code can be written for the evaluation rule, so that the evaluation code can be conveniently modified, or when a certain evaluation rule is not applicable any more, the code section corresponding to the evaluation rule can be directly deleted, or when the grading content of the certain evaluation rule needs to be modified, the code section of the evaluation rule can be directly found, and the modification of the code section does not need to be carried out, so that the maintenance of the general evaluation code of the new and old evaluation rules is convenient.

105: And determining the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the ESG index of the at least one evaluation item.

For example, the ESG indexes of each evaluation item under each evaluation index may be summed up as the ESG index under each evaluation index. In addition, a corresponding weight may be set for each evaluation item, and the ESG indexes of each evaluation item may be weighted and summed by the preset weight to be used as the ESG index under each evaluation index. Then, for the multiple evaluation indexes, weighting and summing the weights of the multiple evaluation indexes and the ESG indexes of the multiple evaluation indexes can be carried out to obtain the ESG scores of the enterprise to be evaluated. The manner of determining the weights of the plurality of evaluation indexes is described in detail later, and will not be described in detail here.

106: And sending the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated to target equipment, so that a user of the target equipment makes a decision related to the enterprise to be evaluated according to the ESG index pair of the enterprise to be evaluated.

It can be seen that, in the embodiment of the present application, a data structure is set for each evaluation index, and the disclosure data under each evaluation index is converted into structured data; then, according to the structured data of each evaluation index, configuring a target evaluation code for the evaluation item under each evaluation index; therefore, the target evaluation code can be called to automatically perform ESG evaluation for the evaluation item to obtain an ESG index of the evaluation item, and further the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated is obtained, so that the ESG evaluation of the enterprise is completed based on data structuring and code calling, manual evaluation is not needed, and the evaluation efficiency is improved. Because of automatic evaluation, the method is relatively objective, and solves the subjectivity problem caused by manual evaluation.

In one embodiment of the present application, the ESG index of the present application may have different application scenarios according to different target devices.

Scene 1: when the target device is a device of an investment institution, the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated is sent to the investment institution, and the investment institution can make an investment decision related to the enterprise to be evaluated. For example, since the ESG index of an enterprise reflects the value and sustainable development capability of the enterprise, when the ESG index of an enterprise to be evaluated is high, the investment amount and the investment period for the enterprise to be evaluated can be added; when the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated is low, the investment of Divestment on the enterprise to be evaluated or the investment of the enterprise to be evaluated can be reduced, and the like. In general, if the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated is sent to the investment institution, the direction of investment of the investment institution can be provided, and the investment risk is reduced.

Scene 2: and when the target equipment is equipment of the enterprise to be evaluated, sending the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated to the enterprise to be evaluated, and making a management decision related to the enterprise to be evaluated by the enterprise to be evaluated. Illustratively, as the ESG index of an enterprise reflects the value and sustainable development capabilities of the enterprise, as investors' acceptance of the ESG index increases, the emphasis on social responsibility of the enterprise is greater, more willing to invest in higher enterprises of the ESG index. Therefore, when the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated is higher, the enterprise to be evaluated is facilitated to make a measure for strengthening management, and the performance in the aspect of ESG is kept; when the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated is low, the enterprise to be evaluated needs to adjust the development strategy of the enterprise, so that the sustainable development of the enterprise is improved, and the ESG index is improved. In general, if the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated is sent to the enterprise to be evaluated, the enterprise to be evaluated is facilitated to be promoted to strive to improve the ESG evaluation condition of the enterprise to be evaluated, and the benign development of the enterprise to be evaluated is guided.

Scene 3: when the target device is a device of a government or social organization, the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated is transmitted to the government or social organization, the government or social organization may formulate a plan associated with the enterprise to be evaluated. Illustratively, since the ESG index of an enterprise reflects the value of the enterprise and the ability to sustain development. Therefore, when the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated is higher, the development potential of the enterprise to be evaluated is higher, and the enterprise to be evaluated can be promoted greatly, so that more development opportunities are provided for the enterprise to be evaluated; when the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated is lower, which indicates that the development potential of the enterprise to be evaluated is lower, such enterprise adjustment company development strategy can be blamed or support can be reduced to guide the adjustment of the enterprise to be evaluated to the benign development direction.

It should be understood that, performing ESG evaluation on an enterprise to be evaluated, mainly performing evaluation through three evaluation dimensions respectively, wherein a plurality of evaluation indexes exist under each evaluation dimension, for each evaluation dimension, determining an ESG index corresponding to each evaluation index under each evaluation dimension according to the evaluation index of each evaluation dimension and the evaluation rule of each evaluation dimension respectively, and then weighting the ESG index under each evaluation index according to the weight of each evaluation index under each evaluation dimension to obtain the ESG index under each dimension; and finally, weighting the ESG indexes under each dimension to obtain the ESG indexes of the enterprise to be evaluated.

A method of determining the weight of each evaluation index in each evaluation dimension is described below.

Referring to fig. 2, fig. 2 is a flowchart illustrating a method for determining weights of evaluation indexes according to an embodiment of the present application. The method comprises the following steps:

201: an evaluation index set is obtained, wherein the evaluation index set comprises evaluation indexes under a plurality of evaluation dimensions, and each evaluation dimension comprises at least one evaluation index.

Optionally, an evaluation index configuration table may be obtained, and fields in the evaluation index configuration table are identified to obtain an evaluation index set. For example, if the evaluation index configuration table is recorded with the evaluation index in each evaluation dimension in advance, the evaluation index configuration table may be read from the storage space of the evaluation index configuration table. Then, the fields in the evaluation configuration table are identified, for example, character recognition can be performed in a row field mode, so as to obtain the evaluation indexes recorded in each row, and the evaluation indexes recorded in each row are synthesized to obtain the evaluation index set.

202: And determining the target weight of each evaluation index in each evaluation dimension.

Illustratively, an initial weight of each evaluation index in each evaluation dimension is first determined in that evaluation dimension; then, determining the actual weight of each evaluation index under each evaluation dimension according to the historical ESG evaluation data of a plurality of enterprises; and finally, fusing the initial weight and the actual weight of each evaluation index in each evaluation dimension to obtain the target weight of each evaluation index in each evaluation dimension.

Optionally, acquiring a preset score of each evaluation index in each preset evaluation dimension in the evaluation dimension, wherein the preset score is used for representing the importance degree of the evaluation index relative to the evaluation dimension, and the preset score of each evaluation index in each evaluation dimension is preset; and carrying out normalization processing on the preset scores of each evaluation index in each evaluation dimension to obtain the initial weight of each evaluation index in each evaluation dimension.

Illustratively, the initial weight of each evaluation index in any one evaluation dimension can be represented by formula (1):

Wherein w _i is the initial weight of the ith evaluation index in any evaluation dimension, r _i is the preset score of the ith evaluation index in the evaluation dimension, n is the number of the evaluation indexes in the evaluation dimension, and r _j is the preset score of the jth evaluation index in the evaluation dimension.

Optionally, historical ESG evaluation data of a plurality of enterprises are obtained, where the historical ESG evaluation data of each enterprise includes an evaluation index used when performing ESG evaluation on each enterprise, and the manner in which the historical ESG evaluation data of each enterprise is similar to the manner in which enterprise data of an enterprise to be evaluated is obtained later is not repeated. Determining an evaluation index used when performing ESG evaluation on each enterprise in the plurality of enterprises according to the historical ESG evaluation data of the plurality of enterprises; according to the evaluation indexes used when ESG evaluation is carried out on each enterprise in a plurality of enterprises, the number of times each evaluation index is used in each evaluation dimension is determined, namely the number of times each evaluation index in an evaluation index set is determined. It should be understood that if one of the above-mentioned evaluation index sets is not used all the time when ESG evaluation is performed on the plurality of enterprises, the number of times that the evaluation index is used is set to be zero.

And finally, carrying out normalization processing on the times used by each evaluation index in each evaluation dimension to obtain the initial weight of each evaluation index in each evaluation dimension.

Illustratively, the initial weight of each evaluation index in any one evaluation dimension can be represented by formula (2):

Wherein w _i is the initial weight of the ith evaluation index in any one evaluation dimension, k _i is the number of times the ith evaluation index in the evaluation dimension is used, n is the number of evaluation indexes in the evaluation dimension, and k _j is the number of times the jth evaluation index in the evaluation dimension is used.

Further, the evaluation indexes under each evaluation dimension are subjected to back measurement based on a model training mode, and the actual weight of each evaluation index under each evaluation dimension is obtained.

Specifically, the historical ESG evaluation data of each enterprise further includes a historical ESG index corresponding to each of the evaluation indexes used when performing ESG evaluation on each enterprise. Thus, a historical ESG index for each enterprise at each of the set of evaluation indicators may be determined. It should be understood that, for a certain enterprise, there is no historical ESG index under a certain evaluation index, then the historical ESG index corresponding to the evaluation index is set to 0 and then, according to the historical ESG index of each enterprise in each evaluation dimension, and the historical profitability; taking a historical ESG index of each enterprise under each evaluation index of each evaluation dimension as a training sample, and predicting the profitability of each enterprise in each evaluation dimension by combining the preset weight of each evaluation index of each evaluation dimension.

Illustratively, a correspondence relationship between the yield and the evaluation index is previously constructed, wherein the correspondence relationship can be represented by the formula (3):

R=α1×mark (t 1) +α2×mark (t 2) + … … αn×mark (tn) formula (3);

Wherein R is the yield, mark is the evaluation operation, t1 is the evaluation index 1, tn is the evaluation index n, and α is the weight coefficient corresponding to each evaluation index.

Therefore, based on the correspondence shown in the formula (3), the historical ESG index of each enterprise under each evaluation index of each evaluation dimension is input to the formula (3), and the yield of each enterprise can be predicted.

Then, determining a predicted loss based on the predicted profitability of each enterprise and the historical profitability of each enterprise; and adjusting the value of the weight of each evaluation index in each evaluation dimension based on the predicted loss and the gradient descent method until the predicted loss is smaller than the threshold value, and taking the value of the weight of each evaluation index in each evaluation dimension at the moment as the actual weight of each evaluation index in each evaluation dimension.

Optionally, the manner of fusing the initial weight and the actual weight of each evaluation index in each evaluation dimension may be implemented by the following steps:

Obtaining the maximum value and the minimum value in the actual weight of each evaluation index in each evaluation dimension, and determining the average value of the actual weight of each evaluation index in each evaluation dimension; based on the initial weight of each evaluation index in each evaluation dimension, the maximum value, the minimum value and the average value in the actual weight of each evaluation index, and the preset hyper-parameters, the initial weight and the actual weight of each evaluation index in each evaluation dimension are fused, and the weight of each evaluation index in each evaluation dimension is obtained.

Illustratively, the weight of each evaluation index in any one of the evaluation dimensions can be represented by the formula (4):

Wherein wi is the initial weight of the ith evaluation index in any evaluation dimension, fi is the actual weight of the ith index in the evaluation dimension, mean (F), max (F), min (F) are the average value, the maximum value and the minimum value of the actual weight of each evaluation index in the evaluation dimension, and P is a preset super parameter.

Setting the fusion of equation (4) has the following benefits:

When the initial weight of each evaluation index is calculated by a preset score, that is, the weight determined based on expert experience in the calculation mode of the formula (1), the initial weight can be taken as a center, the weight obtained by training a model is used for adjusting the specific initial weight, and the adjustment ratio does not exceed p. This allows the initial weights to be adjusted on the basis of the weights given by the mobile service expert. 2. By training the optimal model by using the historical yield correlation, the yield is improved as much as possible, so that ESG evaluation accords with an investment scene, thereby attracting investors to invest enterprises with higher ESG indexes to a greater extent, and in turn promoting the enterprises to pursue the development more in accordance with ESG standards, and realizing sustainable development.

In one embodiment of the present application, due to the problem of missing data acquisition or the inadequacy of the enterprise itself to disclose some data, the missing disclosure data of some evaluation indexes in the acquired enterprise data of the enterprise to be evaluated is missing, in order to improve the accuracy of performing ESG evaluation on the enterprise to be evaluated, the missing disclosure data needs to be complemented, and then the ESG evaluation is performed on the enterprise to be evaluated using the complemented disclosure data.

The process of data complementation is described below by taking the obtained enterprise data of the enterprise to be evaluated as the enterprise data of the enterprise to be evaluated in the preset time period as an example in combination with the accompanying drawings.

Referring to fig. 3, fig. 3 is a flow chart of a data complement method according to an embodiment of the application. The repetition of the present embodiment with the content shown in fig. 1 and 2 will not be described. The method comprises the following steps:

301: obtaining enterprise data of an enterprise to be evaluated in a preset time period, wherein the preset time period comprises N historical moments, the enterprise data of the enterprise to be evaluated comprises the disclosure data of an evaluation index A at M historical moments, M is less than or equal to N, N is an integer greater than 1, and the evaluation index A is any one of a plurality of evaluation indexes for ESG evaluation of the enterprise.

The preset time period may be any one of the history time periods, for example, may be about ten days, the last month, the last year, or the like. The present application is not limited to a preset time period. That is, the ESG index determination method of the present application may perform ESG evaluation based on data in a recent time period, and may also trace back a history, and perform ESG evaluation for an enterprise in a certain history time period based on data in the history time period.

302: And under the condition that M is smaller than N, supplementing the disclosure data of the evaluation index A according to the enterprise data of the enterprise to be evaluated in the preset time period and the enterprise data of a plurality of first enterprises in the preset time period to obtain the disclosure data of the evaluation index A at N historical moments, wherein the first enterprises are enterprises belonging to the same industry with the enterprise to be evaluated.

The method for acquiring the enterprise data of the plurality of first enterprises in the preset time period is similar to the method for acquiring the enterprise data of the enterprise to be evaluated in the preset time period, and is not repeated. For example, enterprise data associated with the ESG index for each first enterprise may be crawled from the official platform for each first enterprise. It should be understood that, in order to make the disclosure data of the completed enterprises to be evaluated relatively accurate, the disclosure data of the first enterprises are as complete as possible, and thus the disclosure data of the first enterprises including the evaluation index a at N historical time points is taken as an example in the present application.

For example, when M is greater than 1 and less than N, that is, the enterprise to be evaluated discloses the disclosure data of the evaluation index a in N history times, but there is a part of history times that does not disclose the disclosure data of the evaluation index a. For example, in the case that the i-th historical time of the N historical times does not disclose the disclosure data of the evaluation index a, the disclosure data of the enterprise to be evaluated, which is related to the evaluation index a at the i-th historical time, may be completed according to the disclosure data of the enterprise to be evaluated, which is related to the evaluation index a at the historical time adjacent to the i-th historical time, so as to obtain the disclosure data of the enterprise to be evaluated, which is related to the evaluation index a at the N historical times. Wherein, the history time adjacent to the ith history time comprises the (i-1) th history time and/or the (i+1) th history time.

The method includes the steps of obtaining a discount proportion corresponding to an evaluation index A, and complementing the disclosure data related to the evaluation index A of the enterprise to be evaluated at the i-th historical moment according to the discount proportion and the disclosure data related to the evaluation index A of the enterprise to be evaluated at the historical moment adjacent to the i-th historical moment to obtain the disclosure data related to the evaluation index A of the enterprise to be evaluated at the N-th historical moment.

Alternatively, the discount rate corresponding to the evaluation index a may be preset. It should be noted that, when the evaluation rule of the evaluation index a is that the larger the value of the evaluation index a is, the higher the score is, the value of the discount proportion corresponding to the evaluation index a is set to be smaller than 1, so that the undisclosed data can be discounted, and the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated is reduced, so as to encourage the enterprise to be evaluated to actively disclose the data; when the evaluation rule of the evaluation index a is that the larger the value of the evaluation index a is, the lower the score is, the value of the discount proportion corresponding to the evaluation index a can be set to be larger than 1, so that the undisclosed data can be amplified, the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated is reduced, and the enterprise to be evaluated is encouraged to actively disclose the data.

Alternatively, it is determined by evaluating the number of disclosures of the index a within the set period. Specifically, the total number of times to be disclosed of the evaluation index a specified in the set time period is obtained, and the number of times to be actually disclosed of the evaluation index a in the set time period is obtained; and determining the discount proportion corresponding to the evaluation index A according to the total number of times the evaluation index A is required to be disclosed, the actual number of times the evaluation index A is disclosed and the evaluation rule of the evaluation index A. Specifically, when the evaluation rule of the evaluation index a is that the larger the value of the evaluation index a is, the higher the score is, the ratio of the number of times the evaluation index a is actually disclosed to the total number of times the evaluation index a is to be disclosed can be used as the discount proportion; when the evaluation rule of the evaluation index a is that the larger the value of the evaluation index a is, the lower the score is, the ratio of the total number of times the evaluation index a is to be disclosed to the number of times the evaluation index a is actually disclosed may be taken as the discount ratio.

Optionally, taking the first product of the disclosure data related to the evaluation index A at the i-1 th historical time and the discount proportion as the disclosure data related to the evaluation index A at the i-1 th historical time; ;

alternatively, the second product of the disclosure data related to the evaluation index a at the i+1th historical time and the discount rate is taken as the disclosure data related to the evaluation index a at the i-th historical time;

Optionally, a first product of the disclosure data related to the evaluation index a at the i-1 th historical time and the discount proportion is obtained, and a second product of the disclosure data related to the evaluation index a at the i+1 th historical time and the discount proportion is obtained, and the first product and the second product are integrated to obtain the disclosure data related to the evaluation index a at the i-1 th historical time. For example, an average value or a maximum value or a minimum value of the first product and the second product is taken as disclosure data related to the evaluation index a at the i-th history time; or determining an ESG index corresponding to each product of the first product and the second product according to the evaluation rule of the evaluation index A, and taking the product corresponding to the highest ESG index as the disclosure data related to the evaluation index A at the ith historical time.

For example, if the evaluation index a is the average electricity consumption, the larger the average electricity consumption, the lower the ESG index. Therefore, the discount proportion of the evaluation index A is set or calculated to be 1.2, and when the average electricity consumption of the enterprise to be evaluated at the i-1 th historical time is 30 degrees and the average electricity consumption at the i-1 th historical time is used for complementing the disclosure data at the i-1 th historical time, the average electricity consumption at the i-1 th historical time is 36; when the average power consumption of the enterprise to be evaluated at the (i+1) th historical time is 40 ℃, and the average power consumption of the enterprise to be evaluated at the (i+1) th historical time is used for supplementing the disclosure data at the (i) th historical time, the average power consumption of the enterprise at the (i) th historical time is 48 ℃; if the disclosure data corresponding to the highest ESG index is used, it is known that the average power consumption is 36 degrees, and the average power consumption 36 is used as the average power consumption of the enterprise to be evaluated at the i-th historical time.

Optionally, if the evaluation index a continuously lacks disclosure data at two histories, for example, neither the i-1 th histories nor the i+1 th histories, the disclosure data at the i-1 th histories may be used to complement the disclosure data at the i-1 th histories, and then the disclosure data at the i-1 th histories after the completion is used to complement the disclosure data at the i+1 th histories, that is, the discount ratio is continuously used twice, so as to complement the disclosure data at the two histories. Of course, the i+2th history may be used to complete the disclosure. Finally, the complete disclosure data in the two directions are combined to obtain disclosure data of the evaluation index A at two historical moments, wherein the combination manner is similar to the combination manner described above and is not described.

It should be understood that if the i-th history time is the first history time in the N history times, the i-th history time does not have the previous history time, so that only the disclosure data at the i-th history time may be used to complement the disclosure data at the i-th history time; similarly, if the i-th history time is the last history time in the N history times, the i-th history time does not have a history time, so that only the last history time, i.e., the disclosure data at the i-1-th history time, can be used to complement the disclosure data at the i-th history time.

In one embodiment of the present application, when m=0, that is, the enterprise to be evaluated does not disclose the disclosure data related to the evaluation index a at the N historical time instants, the disclosure data of the enterprise to be evaluated at the N historical time instants cannot be completed only by the enterprise data of the enterprise to be evaluated.

Optionally, enterprise data of a plurality of first enterprises are obtained, and the plurality of first enterprises disclose the disclosure data of the evaluation index a at N historical moments. Performing ESG evaluation on each first enterprise according to enterprise data of each first enterprise to obtain ESG indexes of each first enterprise, and performing ESG evaluation on the enterprise to be evaluated according to enterprise data of the enterprise to be evaluated to obtain ESG indexes of the enterprise to be evaluated. In the process of performing ESG evaluation on a flat key enterprise, since the enterprise to be evaluated lacks the disclosure data related to the evaluation index a, the ESG index of the evaluation index may be set to zero for the evaluation index a, or the evaluation index AESG is not evaluated, that is, the ESG evaluation is performed on the enterprise to be evaluated roughly based on the disclosure data currently existing in the enterprise to be evaluated (that is, the disclosure data related to other evaluation indexes), so as to obtain the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated.

Then, determining an average value of the disclosure data related to the evaluation index A at each historical time of the first enterprises; and supplementing the disclosure data of the enterprise to be evaluated, which is related to the evaluation index A at the N historical moments, according to the average value of the disclosure data of the first enterprises, which is related to the evaluation index A at each historical moment, the ESG indexes of the first enterprises and the ESG indexes of the enterprise to be evaluated, so as to obtain the disclosure data of the enterprise to be evaluated, which is related to the evaluation index A at the N historical moments.

The disclosure data related to the evaluation index a at each historical time of the enterprise to be evaluated can be represented by the formula (5):

si=m (s/smax) formula (5);

Where si is disclosure data of the enterprise to be evaluated and the evaluation index a at each historical time, m is an average value of disclosure data of the first enterprises and the evaluation index a at each historical time, s is an ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated, and smax is a maximum value of the ESG indexes of the first enterprises and the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated.

The following benefits exist in setting the data complement mode described above:

1. Since the missing disclosure data is complemented, the enterprise's own disclosure behavior (whether disclosure data) also reflects the enterprise's management level and capabilities, and thus, a significant discount should be placed on the complemented estimate of an enterprise that does not disclose data for a certain evaluation index. This step is to further encourage the enterprise to make the disclosure of data as perfect as possible;

2. The business to be evaluated using the estimates is not necessarily the worst performing business, but simply because there is no disclosure data. Therefore, disclosure data with a score of 0 as a default value as an evaluation index is also unreasonable. Specifically, some enterprises do not disclose data under a certain evaluation index because the data is not good, and the data is not disclosed to cause the overall performance of the enterprises to be better, so that even if the performance is good, a good evaluation value cannot be given; in addition, there are enterprises that do not reveal data under a certain evaluation index because they forget to reveal, and not because the data is bad, so too low data (e.g., 0) cannot be given. Therefore, reasonable estimation value should be reasonably estimated based on the overall performance of the enterprise to be evaluated, and taking mean as the highest estimation value is a reasonable option, i.e. controlling the estimation value of the enterprise to be evaluated to be less than or equal to the average value.

303: And according to the disclosure data of the enterprise to be evaluated, which are related to the evaluation index A, under the N historical time points, the disclosure data of the enterprise to be evaluated, which are related to each evaluation index, under the N historical time points are obtained.

By way of example, since the disclosure data of the evaluation index a is complemented to obtain disclosure data related to the evaluation index a at N historical moments, where the evaluation index a is any one of the plurality of evaluation indexes, the disclosure data of any one evaluation index having a disclosure data deficiency is complemented, so that each of the plurality of evaluation indexes has disclosure data at N historical moments, that is, disclosure data related to each of the evaluation indexes at the N historical moments is obtained for an enterprise to be evaluated.

It can be seen that, in the embodiment of the present application, when the disclosure data of an enterprise to be evaluated under a certain evaluation index is missing, the disclosure data of the evaluation index may be complemented according to the enterprise data of the enterprise to be evaluated in a preset time period and the enterprise data of the same industry in the preset time period, instead of simply using the average value to complete the data, so that the complemented data is more matched with the enterprise to be evaluated, and further, the complemented data is used to perform ESG evaluation, so that the obtained ESG index is relatively more accurate, and the formulated decision is also more accurate.

Referring to fig. 4, fig. 4 is a block diagram illustrating functional units of an apparatus 400 for determining an ESG index of an enterprise according to an embodiment of the present application. The enterprise ESG index determination apparatus 400 includes: an acquisition unit 401, a processing unit 402, and a transmission unit 403, wherein:

An obtaining unit 401, configured to crawl, through an application program interface, disclosure data of an enterprise to be evaluated under an evaluation index a, where the evaluation index a is any one of a plurality of evaluation indexes used for performing ESG evaluation on the enterprise to be evaluated;

The processing unit 402 is configured to perform a structuring process on the disclosure data under the evaluation index a according to a preset data structure corresponding to the evaluation index a, so as to obtain at least one piece of structured data, where the at least one piece of structured data corresponds to at least one evaluation item under the evaluation index a one by one; configuring a target evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item in the at least one evaluation item according to the at least one piece of structured data; determining an ESG index of the at least one evaluation item according to the target evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item and the at least one piece of structured data; determining the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the ESG index of the at least one evaluation item;

And a sending unit 403, configured to send the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated to a target device, so that a user of the target device makes a decision related to the enterprise to be evaluated according to the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated.

In some possible embodiments, the data structure corresponding to the preset evaluation index a includes a first field, at least one second field, a third field, and a fourth field;

wherein the first field is used for indicating the identification of the evaluation index A, and the at least one second field is used for indicating the evaluation item of the evaluation index A;

When the evaluation item of the evaluation index a is a qualitative evaluation item, the third field is used for indicating the evaluation content of the evaluation item of the evaluation index a; the fourth field is used to indicate quantitative data of the evaluation item of the evaluation index a when the evaluation item of the evaluation index a is a quantitative evaluation item.

In some possible embodiments, the processing unit 402 is specifically configured to, according to the at least one piece of structured data, configure a target evaluation code corresponding to each of the at least one evaluation item:

Acquiring an evaluation rule of each evaluation item in the evaluation index A;

according to the evaluation rule of each evaluation item in the evaluation index A, calling a general evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item;

and assigning the parameters in the general evaluation codes corresponding to each evaluation item according to the at least one piece of structured data to obtain the target evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item.

In some possible embodiments, in assigning the parameter in the general evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item according to the at least one piece of structured data, the processing unit 402 is specifically configured to:

Assigning a first parameter in the general evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item as an attribute value of a first field in the structured data corresponding to each evaluation item, and assigning a second parameter in the general evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item as an attribute value of a target second field to obtain a target evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item; the target second field is a second field for participating in ESG evaluation in at least one second field in the structured data corresponding to each evaluation item.

In some possible embodiments, the processing unit 402 is specifically configured to determine, according to the target evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item and the at least one piece of structured data, an ESG index of the at least one evaluation item:

Determining structural data corresponding to each evaluation item in the at least one piece of structural data according to the assignment of the first entry and the assignment of the second entry in the target evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item;

Obtaining parameter values of a second input parameter in a target evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item from the structured data corresponding to each evaluation item;

Executing the target evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item based on the parameter value of the second input parameter in the target evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item, and obtaining the ESG index of each evaluation item;

and obtaining the ESG index of the at least one evaluation item according to the ESG index of each evaluation item.

In some possible embodiments, the processing unit 402 is specifically configured to, in determining the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the ESG index of the at least one evaluation item:

synthesizing the ESG indexes of the at least one evaluation item to obtain ESG indexes of the enterprise to be evaluated under the evaluation index A;

And integrating ESG indexes of the enterprise to be evaluated under the plurality of evaluation indexes to obtain ESG indexes of the enterprise to be evaluated.

In some possible embodiments, before structuring the disclosure data under the evaluation index a according to a preset data structure corresponding to the evaluation index a to obtain at least one piece of structured data, the obtaining unit 401 is further configured to obtain at least one evaluation item of the evaluation index a;

the processing unit 402 is further configured to determine whether disclosure data of an evaluation item i exists according to disclosure data of the evaluation index a, where the evaluation item i is any one of the at least one evaluation item;

When a plurality of pieces of disclosure data of the evaluation item i exist, integrating the plurality of pieces of disclosure data of the evaluation item i, and taking the integrated disclosure data as the disclosure data of the evaluation item i;

When the disclosure data of the evaluation item i does not exist, complementing the disclosure data of the evaluation item i to obtain the disclosure data of the evaluation item i;

in terms of performing a structuring process on the disclosure data under the evaluation index a according to a preset data structure corresponding to the evaluation index a to obtain at least one piece of structured data, the processing unit 402 is specifically configured to:

And carrying out structuring treatment on the disclosure data of each evaluation item in the at least one evaluation item according to a preset data structure corresponding to the evaluation index A to obtain the at least one piece of structuring data.

Referring to fig. 5, fig. 5 is a schematic structural diagram of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present application. As shown in fig. 5, the electronic device 500 includes a transceiver 501, a processor 502, and a memory 503. Which are connected by a bus 504. The memory 503 is used to store computer programs and data, and the data stored in the memory 503 may be transferred to the processor 502.

The processor 502 is configured to read a computer program in the memory 503 to perform the following operations:

Specifically, the transceiver 501 may be configured to implement the functions implemented by the acquiring unit 401 and the transmitting unit 403 of the enterprise ESG index determining apparatus 400 in the embodiment illustrated in fig. 4, and the processor 502 may be configured to implement the functions implemented by the processing unit 402 of the enterprise ESG index determining apparatus 400 in the embodiment illustrated in fig. 4. Thus, the specific functions of the transceiver 501 may be referred to the specific functions of the acquisition unit 401 and the transmission unit 403 and the specific functions of the processor 502 may be referred to the above-described processing unit 402, and will not be described.

Embodiments of the present application also provide a computer readable storage medium storing a computer program for execution by a processor to perform some or all of the steps of any weight-based method for determining an ESG index of an enterprise as set forth in the method embodiments described above.

Embodiments of the present application also provide a computer readable storage medium storing a computer program for execution by a processor to perform part or all of the steps of any code-based configurable enterprise ESG index determination method as set forth in the method embodiments described above.

Embodiments of the present application also provide a computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing a computer program operable to cause a computer to perform some or all of the steps of any of the code-based configurable enterprise ESG index determination methods described in the method embodiments above.

It should be noted that, for simplicity of description, the foregoing method embodiments are all described as a series of acts, but it should be understood by those skilled in the art that the present application is not limited by the order of acts described, as some steps may be performed in other orders or concurrently in accordance with the present application. Further, those skilled in the art will also appreciate that the embodiments described in the specification are alternative embodiments, and that the acts and modules referred to are not necessarily required for the present application.

In the foregoing embodiments, the descriptions of the embodiments are emphasized, and for parts of one embodiment that are not described in detail, reference may be made to related descriptions of other embodiments.

In the several embodiments provided by the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed apparatus may be implemented in other manners. For example, the apparatus embodiments described above are merely illustrative, such as the division of the units, merely a logical function division, and there may be additional manners of dividing the actual implementation, such as multiple units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be omitted, or not performed. Alternatively, the coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed with each other may be an indirect coupling or communication connection via some interfaces, devices or units, or may be in electrical or other forms.

The units described as separate units may or may not be physically separate, and units shown as units may or may not be physical units, may be located in one place, or may be distributed on a plurality of network units. Some or all of the units may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of this embodiment.

In addition, each functional unit in the embodiments of the present application may be integrated in one processing unit, or each unit may exist alone physically, or two or more units may be integrated in one unit. The integrated units described above may be implemented either in hardware or in software program modules.

The integrated units, if implemented in the form of software program modules, may be stored in a computer-readable memory for sale or use as a stand-alone product. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of the present application may be embodied essentially or partly in the form of a software product, or all or part of the technical solution, which is stored in a memory, and includes several instructions for causing a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a server, a network device, or the like) to perform all or part of the steps of the method according to the embodiments of the present application. And the aforementioned memory includes: a usb disk, a read-only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM, random Access Memory), a removable hard disk, a magnetic disk, or an optical disk, or other various media capable of storing program codes.

Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that all or a portion of the steps in the various methods of the above embodiments may be implemented by a program that instructs associated hardware, and the program may be stored in a computer readable memory, which may include: flash disk, read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (Random Access Memory, RAM), magnetic disk or optical disk.

The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the more detailed description of embodiments of the application, wherein the principles and embodiments of the application are explained in detail using specific examples, the above examples being provided solely to facilitate the understanding of the method and core concepts of the application; meanwhile, as those skilled in the art will have variations in the specific embodiments and application scope in accordance with the ideas of the present application, the present description should not be construed as limiting the present application in view of the above.

Claims

1. A code-based configurable enterprise ESG index determination method, comprising:

Crawling the disclosure data _, of an enterprise to be evaluated under an evaluation index A through an application program interface, wherein the evaluation index A is any one of a plurality of evaluation indexes for carrying out ESG evaluation on the enterprise to be evaluated;

configuring a target evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item in the at least one evaluation item according to the at least one piece of structured data; comprising the following steps:

Acquiring an evaluation rule of each evaluation item in the evaluation index A;

Calling a general evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item according to an evaluation rule of each evaluation item in the evaluation index A, wherein the general evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item is added with a parameter and is not assigned;

Assigning a first parameter in the general evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item as an attribute value of a first field in the structured data corresponding to each evaluation item, and assigning a second parameter in the general evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item as an attribute value of a target second field to obtain a target evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item; the target second field is a second field for participating in ESG evaluation in at least one second field in the structured data corresponding to each evaluation item;

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of determining the position of the substrate comprises,

The preset data structure corresponding to the evaluation index A comprises a first field, at least one second field, a third field and a fourth field;

3. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the ESG index of the at least one rating item based on the target rating code corresponding to each rating item and the at least one piece of structured data comprises:

4. The method according to any one of claims 1-3, wherein the determining the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated from the ESG index of the at least one evaluation item comprises:

5. The method according to claim 4, wherein before structuring the disclosure data under the evaluation index a according to a preset data structure corresponding to the evaluation index a to obtain at least one structured data, the method further comprises:

acquiring at least one evaluation item of the evaluation index A;

determining whether the disclosure data of an evaluation item i exists according to the disclosure data of the evaluation index A, wherein the evaluation item i is any one of the at least one evaluation item;

the structuring processing is performed on the disclosure data under the evaluation index A according to a preset data structure corresponding to the evaluation index A to obtain at least one piece of structured data, including:

6. An enterprise ESG index determination apparatus, comprising:

the acquisition unit is used for crawling the disclosure data of the enterprise to be evaluated under the evaluation index A through the application program interface;

The processing unit is used for carrying out structuring processing on the disclosure data under the evaluation index A according to a preset data structure corresponding to the evaluation index A to obtain at least one piece of structured data, wherein the at least one piece of structured data corresponds to at least one evaluation item under the evaluation index A one by one; configuring a target evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item in the at least one evaluation item according to the at least one piece of structured data; comprising the following steps:

Acquiring an evaluation rule of each evaluation item in the evaluation index A;

Determining an ESG index of the at least one evaluation item according to the target evaluation code corresponding to each evaluation item and the at least one piece of structured data; determining the ESG index of the enterprise to be evaluated according to the ESG index of the at least one evaluation item;

7. An electronic device, comprising: a processor and a memory, the processor being connected to the memory, the memory being for storing a computer program, the processor being for executing the computer program stored in the memory to cause the electronic device to perform the method of any one of claims 1-5.

8. A computer readable storage medium, characterized in that the computer readable storage medium stores a computer program, which is executed by a processor to implement the method of any of claims 1-5.