CN113178246A - Evaluation and early warning method for teenager psychological crisis - Google Patents
Evaluation and early warning method for teenager psychological crisis Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN113178246A CN113178246A CN202011192386.2A CN202011192386A CN113178246A CN 113178246 A CN113178246 A CN 113178246A CN 202011192386 A CN202011192386 A CN 202011192386A CN 113178246 A CN113178246 A CN 113178246A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- psychological
- crisis
- psychological crisis
- score
- event
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
- G16H20/00—ICT specially adapted for therapies or health-improving plans, e.g. for handling prescriptions, for steering therapy or for monitoring patient compliance
- G16H20/70—ICT specially adapted for therapies or health-improving plans, e.g. for handling prescriptions, for steering therapy or for monitoring patient compliance relating to mental therapies, e.g. psychological therapy or autogenous training
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/16—Devices for psychotechnics; Testing reaction times ; Devices for evaluating the psychological state
- A61B5/165—Evaluating the state of mind, e.g. depression, anxiety
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
- G16H50/00—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics
- G16H50/30—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics for calculating health indices; for individual health risk assessment
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Psychiatry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Social Psychology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Psychology (AREA)
- Hospice & Palliative Care (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Developmental Disabilities (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Child & Adolescent Psychology (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Educational Technology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Surgery (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Measurement Of The Respiration, Hearing Ability, Form, And Blood Characteristics Of Living Organisms (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a method for evaluating and early warning of teenager psychological crisis, which comprises the following steps of constructing a three-level teenager psychological crisis early warning theoretical model; the method comprises the following steps of (1) acquiring juvenile psychological crisis susceptibility and life events: constructing a three-level teenager psychological crisis two-order discrimination model based on a theoretical model; the invention inputs life events and psychological crisis susceptibility scores into a double-order discrimination model for processing, is suitable for the technical field of teenager crisis early warning and psychological service, and brings the double-order effect of the psychological crisis susceptibility on the psychological crisis into a psychological crisis evaluation method from the essential reason of the psychological crisis, thereby constructing a psychological crisis early warning model, greatly improving the prediction effectiveness, providing a better guidance effect for the psychological health early warning and positive psychological development of teenagers, simultaneously realizing the psychological protection effect on the teenagers in the evaluation early warning process, strengthening the continuous protection effect on the psychological health of the teenagers, and increasing the comprehensiveness of prediction data.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of teenager crisis early warning and psychological service, and particularly relates to a method for evaluating and early warning teenager psychological crisis.
Background
The teenager mental health work can not be scientifically and accurately evaluated, the two-factor model is gradually approved under the influence of positive psychology, and a series of applications and researches are derived on the basis, so that the method becomes an important trend of current mental health education. The new trend responds to the confusion that the evaluation hit rate is low in the past, and a new understanding on the mental health of teenagers and a new view angle of crisis evaluation are initiated;
however, the existing method does not consider the double-order effect of susceptibility of psychological crisis on psychological crisis, so that the evaluation degree of psychological crisis is low, the early warning effect of the psychological crisis of teenagers is poor, meanwhile, the existing method predicts the psychological crisis from a negative perspective, the frequent use of vocabularies can start the negative emotion of a tested person, so that the tested person is damaged by negative effect in the evaluation process of the individuals, the evaluation of crisis state by the existing method is difficult to carry out early warning on the psychological crisis of the individuals in a longer time range, the mental health of the teenagers is difficult to protect, and the existing method mostly collects information of the individuals at one time point for evaluation, so that the obtained result is insufficient in persuasion and has great limitation.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to overcome the defects of the prior art and provides a method for evaluating and early warning the psychological crisis of teenagers.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention adopts the following technical scheme:
a method for evaluating and early warning of teenager psychological crisis comprises the following steps:
constructing a three-level teenager psychological crisis early warning theoretical model;
the method comprises the following steps of (1) acquiring juvenile psychological crisis susceptibility and life events:
constructing a three-level teenager psychological crisis two-order discrimination model based on a theoretical model;
and inputting the life event and the psychological crisis susceptibility score into a dual-order discrimination model for processing.
Preferably, the three-level teenager psychological crisis two-level discrimination model comprises various psychological crisis prediction algorithms and various psychological crisis diagnosis standards;
the collection of the susceptibility of the teenager psychological crisis and the life events is carried out by a questionnaire mode;
the collection of susceptibility to psychological crisis is also obtained by behavioral reaction to neutral and positive vocabularies.
Preferably, the inputting the life event and the psychological crisis susceptibility score into the dual-order discrimination model for processing includes:
obtaining various psychological crisis prediction data of the individual through various psychological crisis prediction algorithms;
and comparing each item of psychological crisis prediction data of the individual with each item of psychological crisis diagnosis standard, and feeding back psychological crisis levels.
Preferably, the life events include: being deceived, stress of life, support in the home, and body imagery;
the psychological crisis susceptibility includes: multi-party thinking, emotional management, cognitive level controllability, event proactive responses, positive self-value, and humor style.
Preferably, each psychological crisis prediction algorithm includes:
prediction of anxiety:
predictive anxiety total = multiparty thinking × 0.073+ emotional management × 0.414-cognitive level controlled × 1.4+ event active response × 0.214+ self value × 0.023+ humorous event style × 0.236+ performance fluctuation × 0.111-physical health × 0.148+ deceived × 0.061-in-home support × 0.048+ cognitive level controlled × living pressure total × 0.014-event active response × living pressure total × 0.005+ nap habit × living pressure total × 0.013-event active response × academic performance × 0.019+ cognitive level controlled × 0.05-event active performance × 0.034-afternoon sleeping habit × 0.061-emotional management × 0.142+ cognitive level × 0.138-body health × 0.083+ cognitive level × 0.087-cognitive level;
prediction of depression:
predictive total score for depression = emotional management × 0.017-multiple thinking × 0.086-cognitive level controlled × 0.527+ positive response to event × 0.020-self value × 0.236+ total score of living pressure × 0.016+ nap habit × 0.409-physical health × 0.078+ score fluctuation × 0.052+ deceased × 0.027-home support × 0.052+ emotional management × total score of living pressure × 0.006+ cognitive level controlled × total score of living pressure × 0.01-humorous event style × total score of living pressure × 0.006-humorous event style × 0.024 professional score × 0.024+ multiple thinking score × 0.051-emotional management × 0.037-positive response to event × 0.022-nap habit fluctuation × 0.03+ controlled mood fluctuation × 0.035-home health score × 0.037+ home health care score × 0.034.034-home health management value × 0.034-emotional management;
predicted suicidal ideation total score = multiparty thinking x 0.09-emotional control x 0.022-cognitive level controlled x 0.178+ event active response x 0.108-self value x 0.075-humorous event style x 0.164+ nap habit x 0.194+ pressure of life total score x 0.012+ deceased x 0.094+ academic achievement x 0.027+ score fluctuation x 0.031-physical health x 0.081-home support x 0.049-cognitive level controlled _ pressure of life total score x 0.007-event active response x pressure of life total score x 0.003-humorous event style x life pressure total score x 0.003-event active response x academic achievement x 0.017-nap habit fluctuation x 0.021+ cognitive level fluctuation x 0.026-event score x 0.023-value x 019 x 0.02 x 0.022+ home style of life Physical health x 0.033+ events actively coped x deceived x 0.037+ cognitive level controlled x internal home support x 0.019.
Preferably, the psychological crisis diagnosis criteria include:
predicting a total score of anxiety as normal from-18 to-0.39, mild anxiety before a score of-0.39 to 0.04, moderate anxiety at a score of 0.04 to 0.47, and severe anxiety at a score of 0.47 to 18;
predicting total depression scores of-18 to-0.13 as normal, scores of-0.13 to 0.3625 as mild depression, scores of 0.3625 to 0.854 as moderate depression, and scores of 0.854 to 18 as severe depression;
the predicted suicidal ideation scores were normal from-3 to 0.76, mild from 0.76 to 1.00, moderate from 1.00 to 1.238, and severe from 1.238 to 18.
Preferably, the data comparison between the individual psychological crisis prediction data and the individual psychological crisis diagnosis standards is performed to perform psychological crisis level feedback, and the method includes:
if all the individual prediction data are in a normal range, performing primary potential psychological risk feedback;
if any one of diagnosis indexes of the individual anxiety and depression prediction data is more than mild, performing secondary crisis assessment and feedback;
and if the diagnosis index of the individual suicide intention prediction data is more than mild, performing third-level crisis assessment and feedback.
In summary, due to the adoption of the technical scheme, the invention has the beneficial effects that:
firstly, the invention starts from the essential reason of psychological crisis, brings the double-order effect of psychological crisis susceptibility on the psychological crisis into the psychological crisis evaluation method, further constructs the psychological crisis early warning model, greatly improves the prediction effectiveness, and provides better guidance effect for the psychological health early warning and the active psychological development of teenagers;
meanwhile, the invention mainly adopts neutral and active vocabularies to collect individual information so as to predict the psychological crisis level of the individual, thereby avoiding the teenager psychological negative effect caused by the starting of negative vocabularies and further realizing the effect of protecting the teenager psychology in the process of assessment and early warning;
in addition, the invention pays attention to indexes such as susceptibility, coping ability and the like, thereby warning the group which is possibly in crisis, early warning the individual psychological crisis in a long time period and strengthening the continuous protection effect on the psychological health of teenagers;
finally, the invention has three-dimensional and dynamic information sources, not only students but also parents, classes, schools and other information, and the information is quantitatively analyzed, so that the teenager psychological crisis assessment data obtained by the method is more convincing, and the comprehensiveness of the data is increased.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method for assessing and warning of a psychological crisis of teenagers according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a theoretical model diagram of three-stage psychological crisis early warning for teenagers in the assessment and early warning method for teenagers' psychological crisis according to the present invention;
fig. 3 is a flow chart of a three-level teenager psychological crisis two-level discrimination model in the assessment and early warning method of the teenager psychological crisis of the present invention.
Detailed Description
In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention more apparent, the present invention is described in further detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the invention and are not intended to limit the invention.
Example 1:
this embodiment provides a specific implementation of a method for assessing and warning a psychological crisis of teenagers, as shown in fig. 1 to 3, including:
constructing a three-level teenager psychological crisis early warning theoretical model;
the method comprises the following steps of (1) acquiring juvenile psychological crisis susceptibility and life events:
constructing a three-level teenager psychological crisis two-order discrimination model based on a theoretical model;
and inputting the life event and the psychological crisis susceptibility score into a dual-order discrimination model for processing.
Specifically, the three-level teenager psychological crisis two-level discrimination model comprises various psychological crisis prediction algorithms and various psychological crisis diagnosis standards;
the collection of the susceptibility of the teenager psychological crisis and the life events is carried out by a questionnaire mode;
the collection of susceptibility to psychological crisis is also achieved through behavioral responses to neutral and positive vocabularies.
Specifically, the life event and psychological crisis susceptibility score are input into a dual-order discrimination model for processing, and the processing comprises the following steps:
obtaining various psychological crisis prediction data of the individual through various psychological crisis prediction algorithms;
and comparing each item of psychological crisis prediction data of the individual with each item of psychological crisis diagnosis standard, and feeding back psychological crisis levels.
Specifically, life events, include: being deceived, stress of life, support in the home, and body imagery;
the psychological crisis susceptibility includes: multi-party thinking, emotional management, cognitive level controllability, event proactive responses, positive self-value, and humor style.
Further, each psychological crisis prediction algorithm comprises:
prediction of anxiety:
predictive anxiety total = multiparty thinking × 0.073+ emotional management × 0.414-cognitive level controlled × 1.4+ event active response × 0.214+ self value × 0.023+ humorous event style × 0.236+ performance fluctuation × 0.111-physical health × 0.148+ deceived × 0.061-in-home support × 0.048+ cognitive level controlled × living pressure total × 0.014-event active response × living pressure total × 0.005+ nap habit × living pressure total × 0.013-event active response × academic performance × 0.019+ cognitive level controlled × 0.05-event active performance × 0.034-afternoon sleeping habit × 0.061-emotional management × 0.142+ cognitive level × 0.138-body health × 0.083+ cognitive level × 0.087-cognitive level;
prediction of depression:
predictive total score for depression = emotional management × 0.017-multiple thinking × 0.086-cognitive level controlled × 0.527+ positive response to event × 0.020-self value × 0.236+ total score of living pressure × 0.016+ nap habit × 0.409-physical health × 0.078+ score fluctuation × 0.052+ deceased × 0.027-home support × 0.052+ emotional management × total score of living pressure × 0.006+ cognitive level controlled × total score of living pressure × 0.01-humorous event style × total score of living pressure × 0.006-humorous event style × 0.024 professional score × 0.024+ multiple thinking score × 0.051-emotional management × 0.037-positive response to event × 0.022-nap habit fluctuation × 0.03+ controlled mood fluctuation × 0.035-home health score × 0.037+ home health care score × 0.034.034-home health management value × 0.034-emotional management;
predicted suicidal ideation total score = multiparty thinking x 0.09-emotional control x 0.022-cognitive level controlled x 0.178+ event active response x 0.108-self value x 0.075-humorous event style x 0.164+ nap habit x 0.194+ pressure of life total score x 0.012+ deceased x 0.094+ academic achievement x 0.027+ score fluctuation x 0.031-physical health x 0.081-home support x 0.049-cognitive level controlled _ pressure of life total score x 0.007-event active response x pressure of life total score x 0.003-humorous event style x life pressure total score x 0.003-event active response x academic achievement x 0.017-nap habit fluctuation x 0.021+ cognitive level fluctuation x 0.026-event score x 0.023-value x 019 x 0.02 x 0.022+ home style of life Physical health x 0.033+ events actively coped x deceived x 0.037+ cognitive level controlled x internal home support x 0.019.
Further, various psychological crisis diagnosis criteria include:
predicting a total score of anxiety as normal from-18 to-0.39, mild anxiety before a score of-0.39 to 0.04, moderate anxiety at a score of 0.04 to 0.47, and severe anxiety at a score of 0.47 to 18;
predicting total depression scores of-18 to-0.13 as normal, scores of-0.13 to 0.3625 as mild depression, scores of 0.3625 to 0.854 as moderate depression, and scores of 0.854 to 18 as severe depression;
the predicted suicidal ideation scores were normal from-3 to 0.76, mild from 0.76 to 1.00, moderate from 1.00 to 1.238, and severe from 1.238 to 18.
Further, comparing each item of psychological crisis prediction data of the individual with each item of psychological crisis diagnosis standard, and feeding back psychological crisis levels, the method comprises the following steps:
if all the individual prediction data are in a normal range, performing primary potential psychological risk feedback;
if any one of diagnosis indexes of the individual anxiety and depression prediction data is more than mild, performing secondary crisis assessment and feedback;
and if the diagnosis index of the individual suicide intention prediction data is more than mild, performing third-level crisis assessment and feedback.
By adopting the technical scheme:
firstly, the invention starts from the essential reason of psychological crisis, brings the double-order effect of psychological crisis susceptibility on the psychological crisis into the psychological crisis evaluation method, further constructs the psychological crisis early warning model, greatly improves the prediction effectiveness, and provides better guidance effect for the psychological health early warning and the active psychological development of teenagers;
meanwhile, the invention mainly adopts neutral and active vocabularies to collect individual information so as to predict the psychological crisis level of the individual, thereby avoiding the teenager psychological negative effect caused by the starting of negative vocabularies and further realizing the effect of protecting the teenager psychology in the process of assessment and early warning;
in addition, the invention pays attention to indexes such as susceptibility, coping ability and the like, thereby warning the group which is possibly in crisis, early warning the individual psychological crisis in a long time period and strengthening the continuous protection effect on the psychological health of teenagers;
finally, the invention has three-dimensional and dynamic information sources, not only students but also parents, classes, schools and other information, and the information is quantitatively analyzed, so that the teenager psychological crisis assessment data obtained by the method is more convincing, and the comprehensiveness of the data is increased.
Example 2:
in this embodiment, a specific implementation manner of the assessment and early warning method for a psychological crisis of teenagers is provided, as shown in fig. 1 to 3, when a secondary early warning feedback or a tertiary early warning feedback is obtained, a secondary early warning test or a tertiary early warning test is performed on an individual, and finally, the test result and the prediction result are comprehensively collated to diagnose the type of the psychological crisis;
specifically, the psychological crisis types are:
complex outbreak: the degree of symptoms is severe, the symptoms are caused by various profound individual and environmental factors, and the intervention is very challenging;
cumulative burst: the severity of symptoms, the onset of symptoms being caused by stable individual and environmental factors, which are difficult or impossible to avoid during intervention;
accidental outbreaks: the symptom degree is serious, but various beneficial factors exist in individual and environmental factors, the symptom initiating factor is relatively single, and the intervention direction is relatively direct;
exacerbation-type seizures: obvious symptoms appear, and the current symptoms still have the risk of further worsening because the symptoms are supported by profound individual and environmental factors;
difficult attacks: obvious symptoms appear, individual and environmental factors play an important role in maintaining the symptoms, no effective intervention exists, and the symptoms can be maintained for a long time;
simple onset: obvious symptoms appear, more beneficial factors exist in individual and environmental factors, and the symptoms are caused by single factors;
risk discomfort: slight symptomatic response occurs, but with different degrees of risk due to differences in individual and environmental factors;
potential risk: individual and environmental factors appear to have varying degrees of psychological risk, but symptom performance has not yet reached positive criteria;
when the anxiety prediction result of the individual is mild or above, further completing a secondary early warning test, wherein in the secondary early warning test, related anxiety tests are mainly measured, the score range of the anxiety tests is between 12 and 50, and when the total score is below 33.468, the individual is shown to be in a normal level; the score is a mild stress level between 33.468 and 39.873, the score is a moderate level between 39.873 and 46.278, the score is a severe level between 46.278 and 50, and finally the test result and the prediction result are comprehensively collated to obtain the anxiety mental crisis type shown in the table 1;
TABLE 1
When the prediction result of the individual depression is mild or above, further completing a secondary early warning test, wherein in the secondary early warning test, related depression tests are mainly measured, the score range of the depression tests is 14-50, and when the total score is below 35.9952, the individual is shown to be in a normal level; the score is a mild stress level between 35.952 and 42.039, the score is a moderate level between 42.039 and 48.126, the score is a severe level between 48.126 and 50, and finally the test result and the prediction result are comprehensively collated to obtain the type of the psychological crisis of depression shown in the table 2;
TABLE 2
When the individual suicidal ideation prediction result is mild or more, further completing a second-level suicide early warning test, wherein in the second-level suicide early warning test, the current suicidal ideation is mainly measured, the test results of the suicide test are divided into four types, namely no suicide ideation, suicide attempt and suicide behavior, and finally the test results are dividedComprehensively collating the predicted result with the predicted result to obtain the suicide psychological crisis type shown in the table 3;
| real-time prediction | Has suicide behavior | With suicide attempt | With suicidal ideation | Without suicidal ideation |
| Height of | Complex suicide alarm | Deteriorated suicide early warning | High risk suicide high risk | High-potential suicide crisis |
| In | Cumulative suicide alarm | Difficult suicide early warning | High risk of self-killing in danger | Medium potential suicide crisis |
| Is low in | Accidental suicide alarm | Simple suicide early warning | Low risk suicide high risk | Low potential suicide crisis |
TABLE 3
The working principle is as follows:
firstly, acquiring susceptibility and life events of teenagers to psychological crises in a questionnaire mode, obtaining various psychological crises prediction data of an individual through various psychological crises prediction algorithms, then carrying out data comparison according to various psychological crises prediction data of the individual and various psychological crises diagnosis standards, and carrying out primary potential psychological crises feedback if various prediction data of the individual are in a normal range; if any one of diagnosis indexes of the anxiety data and the depression data of the individual is mild or more, performing secondary psychological crisis assessment and feedback; if the diagnosis index of the individual suicidal ideation prediction data is mild or above, performing three-level crisis assessment and feedback; and finally, performing a second-level early warning test or a third-level early warning test on the individuals, and finally comprehensively sorting the test results and the prediction results to diagnose the psychological crisis types.
The foregoing is a more detailed description of the invention in connection with specific preferred embodiments and it is not intended that the invention be limited to these specific details. For those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains, several simple deductions or substitutions can be made without departing from the spirit of the invention, and all shall be considered as belonging to the protection scope of the invention.
Claims (7)
1. A method for evaluating and early warning of teenager psychological crisis is characterized by comprising the following steps:
constructing a three-level teenager psychological crisis early warning theoretical model;
the method comprises the following steps of (1) acquiring juvenile psychological crisis susceptibility and life events:
constructing a three-level teenager psychological crisis two-order discrimination model based on a theoretical model;
and inputting the life event and the psychological crisis susceptibility score into a dual-order discrimination model for processing.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the method comprises: the three-level teenager psychological crisis two-level discrimination model comprises various psychological crisis prediction algorithms and various psychological crisis diagnosis standards;
the collection of the susceptibility of the teenager psychological crisis and the life events is carried out by a questionnaire mode;
the collection of susceptibility to psychological crisis is also obtained by behavioral reaction to neutral and positive vocabularies.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the step of inputting the life event and the psychological crisis susceptibility score into the dual-stage discriminant model comprises:
obtaining various psychological crisis prediction data of the individual through various psychological crisis prediction algorithms;
and comparing each item of psychological crisis prediction data of the individual with each item of psychological crisis diagnosis standard, and feeding back psychological crisis levels.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the life events comprise: being deceived, stress of life, support in the home, and body imagery;
the psychological crisis susceptibility includes: multi-party thinking, emotional management, cognitive level controllability, event proactive responses, positive self-value, and humor style.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the mental crisis prediction algorithms comprise:
prediction of anxiety:
predicting an anxiety total score of multi-party thinking × 0.073+ emotional control × 0.414-cognitive level controlled × 1.4+ event active response × 0.214+ self value × 0.023+ humorous working style × 0.236+ achievement fluctuation × 0.111-physical health × 0.148+ deceived × 0.061-home support × 0.048+ cognitive level controlled × living pressure total × 0.014-event active response × living pressure total × 0.005+ sleeping afternoon habit × living pressure total × 0.013-event active response × academic achievement × 0.019+ cognitive level controlled × achievement fluctuation × 0.05-event active response × 0.034-sleeping habit × achievement fluctuation × 0.061-emotional control × physical health × 0.142+ cognitive level controlled × 0.138-physical health × 0.138-emotional control × 0.083+ cognitive level × 0.087;
prediction of depression:
predicting total depressed score × 0.017-multiple thinking × 0.086-cognitive level controlled × 0.527+ event active response × 0.020-self value × 0.236+ living pressure total score × 0.016+ afternoon nap habit × 0.409-physical health × 0.078+ score fluctuation × 0.052+ deceased by deception × 0.027-home support × 0.052+ emotion management × living pressure total score × 0.006+ cognitive level controlled × living pressure total score × 0.01-humorous event style × living pressure total score × 0.006-humorous event place style × academic achievement × 0.024+ multiple thinking × 0.051-emotional control × 0.037-event active × 0.022-afternoon sleep habit fluctuation × 0.03+ afternoon mood habit fluctuation × 0.035-home health habit management value × 0.036-home health care score × 0.034-home emotional management × 0.080.034-emotional care score × 0.051-emotional management × 0.037-event active × home health habit fluctuation;
predicting suicidal ideation total score ═ multiparty thinking x 0.09-emotional management x 0.022-cognitive level controlled x 0.178+ event active response x 0.108-self value x 0.075-humorous affairs style x 0.164+ nap habit x 0.194+ pressure of life total score x 0.012+ deceased x 0.094+ academic achievement x 0.027+ score fluctuation x 0.031-physical health x 0.081-home support x 0.049-cognitive level controlled _ pressure of life total score x 0.007-event active response x 0.003-humorous affairs style x life pressure total score x 0.003-event active response x academic achievement x 0.017-nap habit professional x 0.021+ cognitive level controlled fluctuation x 0.026-event score x 0.023 x 0.019 x 0.02 x 0.022+ home habit fluctuation x 0.022 Physical health x 0.033+ events actively coped x deceived x 0.037+ cognitive level controlled x internal home support x 0.019.
6. The method of claim 3, wherein the psychological crisis diagnostic criteria for teenagers include:
predicting a total score of anxiety as normal from-18 to-0.39, mild anxiety before a score of-0.39 to 0.04, moderate anxiety at a score of 0.04 to 0.47, and severe anxiety at a score of 0.47 to 18;
predicting total depression scores of-18 to-0.13 as normal, scores of-0.13 to 0.3625 as mild depression, scores of 0.3625 to 0.854 as moderate depression, and scores of 0.854 to 18 as severe depression;
the predicted suicidal ideation scores were normal from-3 to 0.76, mild from 0.76 to 1.00, moderate from 1.00 to 1.238, and severe from 1.238 to 18.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the comparing of the psychological crisis prediction data of the individual with the psychological crisis diagnosis criteria for psychological crisis level feedback comprises:
if all the individual prediction data are in a normal range, performing primary potential psychological risk feedback;
if any one of diagnosis indexes of the individual anxiety and depression prediction data is more than mild, performing secondary crisis assessment and feedback;
and if the diagnosis index of the individual suicide intention prediction data is more than mild, performing third-level crisis assessment and feedback.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202011192386.2A CN113178246A (en) | 2020-10-30 | 2020-10-30 | Evaluation and early warning method for teenager psychological crisis |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202011192386.2A CN113178246A (en) | 2020-10-30 | 2020-10-30 | Evaluation and early warning method for teenager psychological crisis |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN113178246A true CN113178246A (en) | 2021-07-27 |
Family
ID=76921494
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202011192386.2A Pending CN113178246A (en) | 2020-10-30 | 2020-10-30 | Evaluation and early warning method for teenager psychological crisis |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN113178246A (en) |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113990452A (en) * | 2021-12-27 | 2022-01-28 | 广东数业智能科技有限公司 | Evaluation method and system based on psychological literacy and readable storage medium |
| CN116151494A (en) * | 2023-04-24 | 2023-05-23 | 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 | Data processing method, device, equipment and computer readable storage medium |
| CN117198516A (en) * | 2023-03-06 | 2023-12-08 | 杭州市第七人民医院 | Intelligent evaluation system for college student's depressive disorder |
-
2020
- 2020-10-30 CN CN202011192386.2A patent/CN113178246A/en active Pending
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113990452A (en) * | 2021-12-27 | 2022-01-28 | 广东数业智能科技有限公司 | Evaluation method and system based on psychological literacy and readable storage medium |
| CN117198516A (en) * | 2023-03-06 | 2023-12-08 | 杭州市第七人民医院 | Intelligent evaluation system for college student's depressive disorder |
| CN116151494A (en) * | 2023-04-24 | 2023-05-23 | 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 | Data processing method, device, equipment and computer readable storage medium |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN113178246A (en) | Evaluation and early warning method for teenager psychological crisis | |
| Reardon et al. | The specificity of cognitive vulnerabilities to emotional disorders: Anxiety sensitivity, looming vulnerability and explanatory style | |
| Bolt et al. | A Multigroup Item Response Theory Analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. | |
| Horvath | The effect of selected variables on interpretation of polygraph records. | |
| Mathias et al. | Changes in attention and information-processing speed following severe traumatic brain injury: a meta-analytic review. | |
| Holtzworth-Munroe et al. | Typologies of male batterers: three subtypes and the differences among them. | |
| Haynes et al. | Principles and practice of behavioral assessment | |
| Huprich et al. | Self-report methodology is insufficient for improving the assessment and classification of Axis II personality disorders | |
| Henry et al. | Staying in school protects boys with poor self-regulation in childhood from later crime: A longitudinal study | |
| Hoff et al. | Nonsuicidal self-injury in college students: The role of perfectionism and rumination | |
| Skilling et al. | Identifying persistently antisocial offenders using the Hare Psychopathy Checklist and DSM antisocial personality disorder criteria. | |
| Edens et al. | Effects of positive impression management on the Psychopathic Personality Inventory | |
| Christiansen et al. | Adolescent victimization: Testing models of resiliency by gender | |
| US7761144B2 (en) | Method, apparatus, and computer program product for stochastic psycho-physiological assessment of attentional impairments | |
| Raudenbush | Hierarchical linear models to study the effects of social context on development | |
| Greve et al. | Detecting malingered performance on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Validation of Mittenberg's approach in traumatic brain injury | |
| Jones et al. | Comparative effects of race/ethnicity and employee engagement on withdrawal behavior | |
| Clements et al. | Does acknowledgment as an assault victim impact postassault psychological symptoms and coping? | |
| Chen et al. | Relative impact of young adult personality disorders on subsequent quality of life: findings of a community-based longitudinal study | |
| Intravia et al. | Neighborhood-level differences in police discrimination and subcultural violence: A multilevel examination of adopting the code of the street | |
| Dhammapeera et al. | Imagining a false alibi impairs concealed memory detection with the autobiographical Implicit Association Test. | |
| Sikström et al. | The Depletion–Power–Integration–Latency (DPIL) model of spaced and massed repetition | |
| Perangin-Angin et al. | Classification of stress in office work activities using extreme learning machine algorithm and one-way anova f-test feature selection | |
| Craig et al. | Personality characteristics associated with reconviction in sexual and violent offenders | |
| Elliott et al. | Assessment of abnormal personality in childhood: A Delphi survey of questionnaire data |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |