CN112950036A - Reliability analysis method for high-speed railway traction substation system - Google Patents

Reliability analysis method for high-speed railway traction substation system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN112950036A
CN112950036A CN202110247185.6A CN202110247185A CN112950036A CN 112950036 A CN112950036 A CN 112950036A CN 202110247185 A CN202110247185 A CN 202110247185A CN 112950036 A CN112950036 A CN 112950036A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
reliability
traction substation
speed railway
operator
time
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202110247185.6A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
张海刚
刘飘
刘小钊
陈璇
张文
罗俊
赵德成
邹劲柏
杨明来
童中祥
杨俊�
孙平飞
王燕锋
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shanghai Institute of Technology
Original Assignee
Shanghai Institute of Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shanghai Institute of Technology filed Critical Shanghai Institute of Technology
Priority to CN202110247185.6A priority Critical patent/CN112950036A/en
Publication of CN112950036A publication Critical patent/CN112950036A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/901—Indexing; Data structures therefor; Storage structures
    • G06F16/9024—Graphs; Linked lists
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/10—Complex mathematical operations
    • G06F17/18—Complex mathematical operations for evaluating statistical data, e.g. average values, frequency distributions, probability functions, regression analysis
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/06—Energy or water supply

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Computational Mathematics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
  • Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Computational Biology (AREA)
  • Probability & Statistics with Applications (AREA)
  • Algebra (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Biology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)

Abstract

本发明公开了一种高速铁路牵引变电所系统的可靠性分析方法，包括步骤1：定义高速铁路牵引变电所系统的评价体系，即规定系统范围，明确系统可靠性指标；步骤2：确定高速铁路牵引变电所系统可靠性建模的成功导向准则和可靠性指标；步骤3：将高速铁路牵引变电所的电气主接线作为研究对象，确定GO‑FLOW的信号流方向并且选择合适的操作符，建立牵引变电所的电气主接线的GO‑FLOW图；步骤4：输入各操作符的可靠性参数；步骤5：通过对GO‑FLOW各操作符的定量计算与分析得到其稳态和动态可靠性指标；步骤6：完成高速铁路牵引变电所系统的可靠性评价。

Figure 202110247185

The invention discloses a reliability analysis method for a traction substation system of a high-speed railway. Success guiding criteria and reliability indicators for reliability modeling of high-speed railway traction substations; Step 3: Take the electrical main wiring of high-speed railway traction substations as the research object, determine the signal flow direction of GO-FLOW and select the appropriate one operator to establish the GO-FLOW diagram of the electrical main wiring of the traction substation; Step 4: Input the reliability parameters of each operator; Step 5: Obtain its steady state by quantitative calculation and analysis of each operator of GO-FLOW and dynamic reliability index; Step 6: Complete the reliability evaluation of the high-speed railway traction substation system.

Figure 202110247185

Description

Reliability analysis method for high-speed railway traction substation system
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of railway traction power supply, in particular to a reliability analysis method for a high-speed railway traction substation system.
Background
With the large-scale construction of high-speed railways in China, people pay high attention to the reliability problem of a traction power supply system. The traction substation is used as the core of a traction power supply system and plays a role of a bridge for connecting an external power system and a contact network. Therefore, its failure will affect the normal operation of the high-speed railway and cause huge losses. In order to ensure the safe and stable running of the locomotive group, the power supply reliability of the high-speed railway traction power substation must be ensured.
China starts earlier in the aspect of reliability research of electric power systems, and has more achievements, but has less reliability research on traction power supply systems. At present, the fault tree analysis method (FTA) is applied to the reliability research of a traction power supply system in Chenshaoshao and Wanyi, the fault tree of an electric main connection wire and a contact network of a traction substation is established, and qualitative and quantitative analysis is completed; thanks to the selection of Weibull distribution as a reliability model by Sword, an artificial intelligence algorithm based on a genetic algorithm is provided, goodness-of-fit inspection is carried out, and fitting accuracy is improved; the Li military intelligence and Zhao Jian put forward a successful flow method (GO) and successfully applied to a traction substation, thereby finding out a simple, convenient, clear and practical method for researching the reliability of the traction substation. Takeshi Matsuoka et al further supplements and perfects the principle and method of GO-FLOW, theoretically establishes a knowledge structure of the application of the GO-FLOW, and analyzes the reliability of a reactor core emergency cooling system of a boiling water reactor and the like and the reliability of a product production process by using a GO-FLOW method. In addition, the GO-FLOW process is also used to address common cause failures. In practical application, the GO-FLOW method is used for analyzing the reliability and safety of systems such as nuclear power stations and the like, and is also used in other fields. The aging problem of nuclear power plants was studied by the GO-FLOW method by Tadatsugi Okazaki, Nobuo Mitomo, and the like, Japan Ship research institute. And the Takeshi Matsuoka adopts a dynamic event tree and a GO-FLOW method to perform reliability analysis on the relay delay system.
Disclosure of Invention
GO-FLOW is a new probability risk evaluation method, which is mainly used for the probability of occurrence of complex time sequence or state. The GO-FLOW method adopts a graphical deduction mode, takes successful operation as a basis of reliability modeling, selects corresponding operational characters, directly establishes a GO-FLOW diagram according to a schematic diagram or a block diagram of the system, calculates the probability of occurrence of various states of the system, has good precision of calculation results and small calculation amount, and provides a reliable scientific basis for the maintenance plan of the whole equipment of a traction power supply station system.
In order to achieve the above purpose, the technical solution for solving the technical problem is as follows:
a reliability analysis method for a high-speed railway traction substation system comprises the following steps:
step 1: defining an evaluation system of a high-speed railway traction substation system, namely, specifying a system range and determining a system reliability index;
step 2: determining a successful guide criterion and a reliability index of reliability modeling of a high-speed railway traction substation system;
and step 3: taking the main electrical wiring of the high-speed railway traction substation as a research object, determining the signal FLOW direction of GO-FLOW and selecting a proper operator, and establishing a GO-FLOW diagram of the main electrical wiring of the traction substation;
and 4, step 4: inputting reliability parameters of the operational characters;
and 5: obtaining steady-state and dynamic reliability indexes of the GO-FLOW through quantitative calculation and analysis of each operational character;
step 6: and completing the reliability evaluation of the high-speed railway traction substation system.
Further, in the step 1: from the aspect of reliability, the traction substation is an engineering redundancy repairable system, all primary partial equipment, subsystems and systems of the traction substation are assumed to be subjected to exponential distribution and have the system average characteristic in a stable operation stage, main component equipment of the high-speed railway traction substation comprises a bus, a traction transformer, a circuit breaker, an isolating switch, a voltage transformer and a current transformer, two groups of traction transformers (T1, T2) and (T3 and T4) which are mutually hot standby are adopted to meet the continuous power supply requirement, and an external power supply is a 220 kv-grade power supply.
Further, in the step 2: the method is characterized in that normal power supply of an uplink and downlink contact network of a high-speed railway traction substation is used as a successful guidance criterion for reliability modeling, and reliability indexes mainly comprise fault rate lambda, maintenance rate, reliability, mean time to failure, mean maintenance time, mean life cycle, steady-state mean working probability, mean shutdown probability and mean failure times.
Further, the step 2 specifically includes the following steps:
step 21: the reliability R (t) and the unreliability F (t) are respectively expressed as:
R(t)＝P(T＞t)(0＜t＜∞) (1)
F(t)＝1-R(t) (2)
wherein T is the lifetime of the system component;
step 22: the fault rate lambda (t) is expressed as:
Figure BDA0002964515810000031
this gives a relation to the reliability:
Figure BDA0002964515810000032
step 23: the maintenance rate is a probability index for measuring the maintenance performance of the product, and is expressed by mu (t), and the formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002964515810000033
in the formula, TDRepairing time for the product;
step 24: mean Time Between Failures (MTBF), where MTBF is an average value of working times of a component between two adjacent failures when the component fails, for a repairable component, and the MTBF is expressed as:
Figure BDA0002964515810000034
step 25: mean time to repair MTTR, MTTR is the average number of component repair times and is the ratio of total repair time to the number of repairs, and the MTTR is expressed as:
Figure BDA0002964515810000035
step 26: the steady-state availability A, also called the average working probability, is the availability of the element when the time tends to infinity, and the expression is as follows:
Figure BDA0002964515810000041
i.e. unavailability
Figure BDA0002964515810000042
Expressed, its expression is:
Figure BDA0002964515810000043
step 27: the average life-cycle MCT is expressed as:
MCT＝MTBF+MTTR (10)
step 28: the average failure frequency f is expressed as:
Figure BDA0002964515810000044
further, in the step 3: in the GO-FLOW method, a connection line representing an input-output relationship between operators is called a signal line, and the signal FLOW strength represents the reliability of a system, namely the probability of successful operation of the system, and the specific steps are as follows:
step 31: the GO-FLOW method defines 14 types of standard operators, wherein at a time point t, the strength of an output signal is represented by R (t), the strength of a main input signal is represented by S (t), and the number of time points is represented by n;
step 32: the functions and characteristics of operators in the GO-FLOW method are generally distinguished by type numbers, and each specific type number corresponds to a specific operation rule:
(1) type 21 operator-two-state element
Type 21 operators are used to represent two state elements, PgTo representThe success probability of the element represented by the operator, and the output signal strength are expressed as:
R(t)＝S(t)·Pg (12)
(2) type 22 operator-OR gate
The type 22 operator is a logic gate used to represent the logical relationship of a plurality of signals, and the output signal strength is expressed as:
Figure BDA0002964515810000051
(3) type 23 operator-NOT gate
The type 23 operator is a logic gate which is in the logical relationship of an input signal and an output signal NOT gate, and the expression of the strength of the output signal is as follows:
R(t)＝1-S(t) (14)
(4) type 30 operator-AND gate
Representing the logical relationship of a plurality of signals, and assuming that M input signals are independent of each other, the output signal strength is expressed as:
Figure BDA0002964515810000052
(5) type 35 operator-a working element that fails over time
A type 35 operator, γ represents the failure probability of the element represented by the operator in unit time, i.e. failure rate, assuming γ is constant, and for the type 35 operator, the second input signal strength represents a time interval, the output signal strength r (t) decreases due to the effect of failure rate, r (t) is influenced by the main input signal S (t) before the time point tk) The effect, expressed as:
Figure BDA0002964515810000053
step 33: the high-speed railway traction substation has various component elements, so that the simplification is realized by adopting an equivalent unit method, and each equivalent unit is represented by an operator;
step 34: based on the GO-FLOW method principle, the GO-FLOW diagram of the main wiring of the high-speed railway traction substation is established by considering that the electrical equipment of the traction substation has a certain service life, namely the failure probability of elements changes along with the change of time.
Further, in the step 5: assuming that N shutdown-related serial parts correspond to one operator, when I is 1, the equivalent failure rate of the serial structure is lambdaRMean time to repair τRThe method comprises the following specific steps:
step 51: failure rate λRThe expression of (a) is:
Figure BDA0002964515810000054
Figure BDA0002964515810000061
Figure BDA0002964515810000062
the tape (18) is brought with the formula (19) to give (20):
Figure BDA0002964515810000063
wherein λ isSiIs the failure rate of the ith series equivalent cell, τSiMean time to repair, μ, of the ith series equivalent cellSiThe variation range of the value of i is [1, N ] for the average maintenance rate of the ith series equivalent unit]；
Step 52: probability value P of successful state of output signal of series equivalent unitR(1) The expression is as follows:
Figure BDA0002964515810000064
i.e. probability value P of fault state of output signal of series equivalent unitR(2) The expression is as follows:
Figure BDA0002964515810000065
due to the adoption of the technical scheme, compared with the prior art, the invention has the following advantages and positive effects:
1. the invention relates to a reliability analysis method of a high-speed railway traction substation system, which is mainly based on a GO-FLOW method, and is a system probability analysis technology which takes success as guidance;
2. the high-speed railway traction substation conforms to the GO-FLOW basic modeling rule, the model structure is clear, the significance of internal parameters of each component of the model is clear, and the internal parameters are easy to obtain;
3. the invention is suitable for modeling analysis of large complex systems, especially for reliability and safety analysis of complex systems with multiple states and time sequence function conversion, and has short modeling time, low cost and strong practicability.
4. The invention proves the correctness and the applicability of the GO-FLOW method based on the GO method, and embodies the superiority of the GO-FLOW method. The reliability and the safety of the train in the running process can be improved, meanwhile, corresponding theoretical reference is provided for avoiding the rail transit traction power supply system fault, and a basis and a premise are provided for the overhaul and the health management of the traction power supply system.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. It is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the invention, and that for a person skilled in the art, other drawings can be derived from them without inventive effort. In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is an overall flow chart of the reliability research method of the high-speed railway traction substation system of the invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of the electrical main wiring of the high speed railway traction substation;
FIG. 3 is a diagram of the GO-FLOW method defining 14 types of standard operators and their type names and symbols;
FIG. 4 is a GO-FLOW diagram of the main wiring of a high-speed railway traction substation.
Detailed Description
While the embodiments of the present invention will be described and illustrated in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the specific embodiments disclosed, but is intended to cover various modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
As shown in fig. 1-2, the present embodiment discloses a reliability analysis method for a high-speed railway traction substation system, which includes the following steps:
step 1: defining an evaluation system of a high-speed railway traction substation system, namely, specifying a system range and determining a system reliability index;
step 2: determining a successful guide criterion and a reliability index of reliability modeling of a high-speed railway traction substation system;
and step 3: taking the main electrical wiring of the high-speed railway traction substation as a research object, determining the signal FLOW direction of GO-FLOW and selecting a proper operator, and establishing a GO-FLOW diagram of the main electrical wiring of the traction substation;
and 4, step 4: inputting reliability parameters of the operational characters;
and 5: obtaining steady-state and dynamic reliability indexes of the GO-FLOW through quantitative calculation and analysis of each operational character;
step 6: and completing the reliability evaluation of the high-speed railway traction substation system.
Further, in the step 1: from the aspect of reliability, the traction substation is an engineering redundancy repairable system, all primary partial equipment, subsystems and systems of the traction substation are assumed to be subjected to exponential distribution and have the system average characteristic in a stable operation stage, main component equipment of the high-speed railway traction substation comprises a bus, a traction transformer, a circuit breaker, an isolating switch, a voltage transformer, a current transformer and the like, in order to meet continuous power supply requirements, two groups of traction transformers (T1, T2) and (T3 and T4) which are mutually hot standby are adopted, and an external power supply is a 220 kv-grade power supply.
Further, in the step 2: the method is characterized in that normal power supply of an uplink and downlink contact network by a high-speed railway traction substation is used as a successful guidance criterion for reliability modeling, and reliability indexes related to the research of the embodiment mainly comprise fault rate lambda, maintenance rate, reliability, mean time to failure (MTBF), mean maintenance time (MTTR), mean life cycle, steady-state mean working probability, mean shutdown probability and mean failure times.
Further, the step 2 specifically includes the following steps:
step 21: the reliability R (t) and the unreliability F (t) are respectively expressed as:
R(t)＝P(T＞t)(0＜t＜∞) (1)
F(t)＝1-R(t) (2)
wherein T is the lifetime of the system component;
step 22: the fault rate lambda (t) is expressed as:
Figure BDA0002964515810000081
this gives a relation to the reliability:
Figure BDA0002964515810000082
step 23: the maintenance rate is a probability index for measuring the maintenance performance of the product, and is expressed by mu (t), and the formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002964515810000091
in the formula, TDRepairing time for the product;
step 24: mean Time Between Failures (MTBF), MTBF is an average value of the operating Time Between two adjacent failures of a repairable element when the element fails, and the expression of MTBF is:
Figure BDA0002964515810000092
step 25: mean Time To Repair (MTTR) which is the average of component repair times and is the ratio of the total repair Time To the number of repairs, and the expression of MTTR is:
Figure BDA0002964515810000093
step 26: the steady-state availability A (availability), which is also called the average working probability, is the availability of the element when the time approaches infinity, and the expression is as follows:
Figure BDA0002964515810000094
i.e. unavailability
Figure BDA0002964515810000095
Expressed, its expression is:
Figure BDA0002964515810000096
step 27: the average life Cycle MCT (mean Cycle time) is expressed as:
MCT＝MTBF+MTTR (10)
step 28: the average failure frequency f is expressed as:
Figure BDA0002964515810000097
further, in the step 3: in the GO-FLOW method, a connection line representing an input/output relationship between operators is referred to as a signal line, and the signal FLOW strength in this embodiment represents the reliability of the system, i.e., the probability of successful operation of the system. The present embodiment introduces several operational rules in detail, and other simple expressions, the specific steps are as follows:
step 31: the GO-FLOW method defines 14 types of standard operators, the type names and symbols of which are shown in fig. 3, and in general, at time t, the strength of the output signal is represented by r (t), the strength of the main input signal is represented by s (t), and the number of time points is represented by n;
step 32: the functions and characteristics of operators in the GO-FLOW method are generally distinguished by type numbers, and each specific type number corresponds to a specific operation rule:
(1) type 21 operator-two-state element
Type 21 operators are used to represent two state elements, PgRepresenting the success probability of the element represented by the operator, the output signal strength is expressed as:
R(t)＝S(t)·Pg (12)
(2) type 22 operator-OR gate
The type 22 operator is a logic gate used to represent the logical relationship of a plurality of signals, and the output signal strength is expressed as:
Figure BDA0002964515810000101
(3) type 23 operator-NOT gate
The type 23 operator is a logic gate which is in the logical relationship of an input signal and an output signal NOT gate, and the expression of the strength of the output signal is as follows:
R(t)＝1-S(t) (14)
(4) type 30 operator-AND gate
As shown, it represents the logical relationship of a plurality of signals, and assuming that M input signals are independent of each other, the output signal strength is expressed as:
Figure BDA0002964515810000102
(5) type 35 operator-a working element that fails over time
The type 35 operator is shown in the figure, gamma represents the failure probability of the element represented by the operator in unit time, namely failure rate, and assuming that gamma is constant, for the type 35 operator, the input signal strength represents a time interval, the output signal strength R (t) is reduced due to the influence of failure rate, and R (t) is influenced by the main input signal S (t) before the time point tk) The effect, expressed as:
Figure BDA0002964515810000111
step 33: the high-speed railway traction substation has various component elements, so that the simplification is realized by adopting an equivalent unit method, each equivalent unit is represented by an operator, and the specific operator meaning is shown in table 1;
Figure BDA0002964515810000112
Figure BDA0002964515810000121
TABLE 1 operational character meaning in GO-FLOW diagram of main connection wire of high-speed railway traction substation
Step 34: based on the GO-FLOW method principle, considering that the electrical equipment of the traction substation has a certain service life, namely the failure probability of elements changes along with the change of time, a GO-FLOW diagram of the main wiring of the traction substation of the high-speed railway is established, as shown in FIG. 4.
Further, in the step 4: the reliability parameters of the main electrical equipment of the traction substation are shown in table 2:
Figure BDA0002964515810000122
TABLE 2 reliability parameters of main electrical equipments of traction substation
Further, in the step 5: assuming that N shutdown-related serial parts correspond to one operator, when I is 1, the equivalent failure rate of the serial structure is lambdaRMean time to repair τRThe method comprises the following specific steps:
step 51: failure rate λRThe expression of (a) is:
Figure BDA0002964515810000131
Figure BDA0002964515810000132
Figure BDA0002964515810000133
the tape (18) is brought with the formula (19) to give (20):
Figure BDA0002964515810000134
wherein λ isSiIs the failure rate of the ith series equivalent cell, τSiMean time to repair, μ, of the ith series equivalent cellSiThe variation range of the value of i is [1, N ] for the average maintenance rate of the ith series equivalent unit]；
Step 52: series equivalent unit output signalProbability value P of number success stateR(1) The expression is as follows:
Figure BDA0002964515810000135
i.e. probability value P of fault state of output signal of series equivalent unitR(2) The expression is as follows:
Figure BDA0002964515810000136
the above description is only for the preferred embodiment of the present invention, but the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto, and any changes or substitutions that can be easily conceived by those skilled in the art within the technical scope of the present invention are included in the scope of the present invention. Therefore, the protection scope of the present invention shall be subject to the protection scope of the claims.

Claims (6)

1. A reliability analysis method for a high-speed railway traction substation system is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step 1: defining an evaluation system of a high-speed railway traction substation system, namely, specifying a system range and determining a system reliability index;
step 2: determining a successful guide criterion and a reliability index of reliability modeling of a high-speed railway traction substation system;
and step 3: taking the main electrical wiring of the high-speed railway traction substation as a research object, determining the signal FLOW direction of GO-FLOW and selecting a proper operator, and establishing a GO-FLOW diagram of the main electrical wiring of the traction substation;
and 4, step 4: inputting reliability parameters of the operational characters;
and 5: obtaining steady-state and dynamic reliability indexes of the GO-FLOW through quantitative calculation and analysis of each operational character;
step 6: and completing the reliability evaluation of the high-speed railway traction substation system.
2. The reliability analysis method for the high-speed railway traction substation system according to claim 1, wherein in the step 1: from the aspect of reliability, the traction substation is an engineering redundancy repairable system, all primary partial equipment, subsystems and systems of the traction substation are assumed to be subjected to exponential distribution and have the system average characteristic in a stable operation stage, main component equipment of the high-speed railway traction substation comprises a bus, a traction transformer, a circuit breaker, an isolating switch, a voltage transformer and a current transformer, two groups of traction transformers (T1, T2) and (T3 and T4) which are mutually hot standby are adopted to meet the continuous power supply requirement, and an external power supply is a 220 kv-grade power supply.
3. The reliability analysis method for the high-speed railway traction substation system according to claim 1, wherein in the step 2: the method is characterized in that normal power supply of an uplink and downlink contact network of a high-speed railway traction substation is used as a successful guidance criterion for reliability modeling, and reliability indexes mainly comprise fault rate lambda, maintenance rate, reliability, mean time to failure, mean maintenance time, mean life cycle, steady-state mean working probability, mean shutdown probability and mean failure times.
4. The reliability analysis method of the high-speed railway traction substation system according to claim 3, wherein the step 2 specifically comprises the following steps:
step 21: the reliability R (t) and the unreliability F (t) are respectively expressed as:
R(t)＝P(T＞t)(0＜t＜∞) (1)
F(t)＝1-R(t) (2)
wherein T is the lifetime of the system component;
step 22: the fault rate lambda (t) is expressed as:
Figure FDA0002964515800000021
this gives a relation to the reliability:
Figure FDA0002964515800000022
step 23: the maintenance rate is a probability index for measuring the maintenance performance of the product, and is expressed by mu (t), and the formula is as follows:
Figure FDA0002964515800000023
in the formula, TDRepairing time for the product;
step 24: the mean time between failure MTBF,
the MTBF is an average value of the operating time of a component between two adjacent failures when the component fails, and the expression of the MTBF is as follows:
Figure FDA0002964515800000024
step 25: mean time to repair MTTR, MTTR is the average number of component repair times and is the ratio of total repair time to the number of repairs, and the MTTR is expressed as:
Figure FDA0002964515800000025
step 26: the steady-state availability A, also called the average working probability, is the availability of the element when the time tends to infinity, and the expression is as follows:
Figure FDA0002964515800000026
i.e. unavailability
Figure FDA0002964515800000027
Expressed, its expression is:
Figure FDA0002964515800000031
step 27: the average life-cycle MCT is expressed as:
MCT＝MTBF+MTTR (10)
step 28: the average failure frequency f is expressed as:
Figure FDA0002964515800000032
5. the reliability analysis method for the high-speed railway traction substation system according to claim 1, wherein in the step 3: in the GO-FLOW method, a connection line representing an input-output relationship between operators is called a signal line, and the signal FLOW strength represents the reliability of a system, namely the probability of successful operation of the system, and the specific steps are as follows:
step 31: the GO-FLOW method defines 14 types of standard operators, wherein at a time point t, the strength of an output signal is represented by R (t), the strength of a main input signal is represented by S (t), and the number of time points is represented by n;
step 32: the functions and characteristics of operators in the GO-FLOW method are generally distinguished by type numbers, and each specific type number corresponds to a specific operation rule:
(1) type 21 operator-two-state element
Type 21 operators are used to represent two state elements, PgRepresenting the success probability of the element represented by the operator, the output signal strength is expressed as:
R(t)＝S(t)·Pg (12)
(2) type 22 operator-OR gate
The type 22 operator is a logic gate used to represent the logical relationship of a plurality of signals, and the output signal strength is expressed as:
Figure FDA0002964515800000033
(3) type 23 operator-NOT gate
The type 23 operator is a logic gate which is in the logical relationship of an input signal and an output signal NOT gate, and the expression of the strength of the output signal is as follows:
R(t)＝1-S(t) (14)
(4) type 30 operator-AND gate
Representing the logical relationship of a plurality of signals, and assuming that M input signals are independent of each other, the output signal strength is expressed as:
Figure FDA0002964515800000041
(5) type 35 operator-a working element that fails over time
A type 35 operator, γ represents the failure probability of the element represented by the operator in unit time, i.e. failure rate, assuming γ is constant, and for the type 35 operator, the second input signal strength represents a time interval, the output signal strength r (t) decreases due to the effect of failure rate, r (t) is influenced by the main input signal S (t) before the time point tk) The effect, expressed as:
Figure FDA0002964515800000042
step 33: the high-speed railway traction substation has various component elements, so that the simplification is realized by adopting an equivalent unit method, and each equivalent unit is represented by an operator;
step 34: based on the GO-FLOW method principle, the GO-FLOW diagram of the main wiring of the high-speed railway traction substation is established by considering that the electrical equipment of the traction substation has a certain service life, namely the failure probability of elements changes along with the change of time.
6. The reliability analysis method for the high-speed railway traction substation system according to claim 1, wherein in the step 5: assuming that N shutdown-related serial parts correspond to one operator, when I is 1, the equivalent failure rate of the serial structure is lambdaRMean time to repair τRThe method comprises the following specific steps:
step 51: failure rate λRThe expression of (a) is:
Figure FDA0002964515800000043
Figure FDA0002964515800000044
Figure FDA0002964515800000051
the tape (18) is brought with the formula (19) to give (20):
Figure FDA0002964515800000052
wherein λ isSiIs the failure rate of the ith series equivalent cell, τSiMean time to repair, μ, of the ith series equivalent cellSiThe variation range of the value of i is [1, N ] for the average maintenance rate of the ith series equivalent unit]；
Step 52: probability value P of successful state of output signal of series equivalent unitR(1) The expression is as follows:
Figure FDA0002964515800000053
i.e. probability value P of fault state of output signal of series equivalent unitR(2) The expression is as follows:
Figure FDA0002964515800000054
CN202110247185.6A 2021-03-05 2021-03-05 Reliability analysis method for high-speed railway traction substation system Pending CN112950036A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110247185.6A CN112950036A (en) 2021-03-05 2021-03-05 Reliability analysis method for high-speed railway traction substation system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202110247185.6A CN112950036A (en) 2021-03-05 2021-03-05 Reliability analysis method for high-speed railway traction substation system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN112950036A true CN112950036A (en) 2021-06-11

Family

ID=76228596

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202110247185.6A Pending CN112950036A (en) 2021-03-05 2021-03-05 Reliability analysis method for high-speed railway traction substation system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN112950036A (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113407428A (en) * 2021-06-22 2021-09-17 贵州理工学院 Reliability evaluation method and device of artificial intelligence system and computer equipment
US20230084573A1 (en) * 2021-09-02 2023-03-16 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Reliability reference model for topology configuration
CN116050675A (en) * 2023-03-31 2023-05-02 中国民用航空飞行学院 Evaluation method and device for instrument landing system based on GO method

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112001073A (en) * 2020-08-17 2020-11-27 上海应用技术大学 Reliability analysis research method of traction power supply system

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112001073A (en) * 2020-08-17 2020-11-27 上海应用技术大学 Reliability analysis research method of traction power supply system

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
王开铭: ""高速铁路牵引变电所可靠性分析与风险评估"", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库工程科技Ⅱ辑》, pages 1 - 6 *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113407428A (en) * 2021-06-22 2021-09-17 贵州理工学院 Reliability evaluation method and device of artificial intelligence system and computer equipment
US20230084573A1 (en) * 2021-09-02 2023-03-16 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Reliability reference model for topology configuration
CN116050675A (en) * 2023-03-31 2023-05-02 中国民用航空飞行学院 Evaluation method and device for instrument landing system based on GO method

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN112950036A (en) Reliability analysis method for high-speed railway traction substation system
CN107609725B (en) A risk assessment method for transmission network considering the influence of substations
MacIver et al. A reliability evaluation of offshore HVDC grid configuration options
CN111144638B (en) Power distribution network operation situation prediction method based on big data
CN102437573A (en) Distribution Network Reliability Evaluation and Control Method and System Based on Fuzzy Modeling
CN110222889B (en) Distribution network feeder automation terminal configuration method based on multiple intelligent algorithms
CN106447522A (en) Full voltage sequence integrated power grid reliability and risk evaluation method
CN103914788A (en) Reliability assessment method for power grid multi-link system
CN111339475B (en) Multi-dimensional intelligent power grid planning evaluation system based on main distribution cooperation
CN105809322A (en) Urban power grid reliability evaluation method taking power generation, power transmission and power distribution systems into integrated consideration
CN107491876A (en) A kind of methods of risk assessment of intelligent substation protection system
CN103618385B (en) One puies forward high-precision state estimation data correction system and method
CN110705878A (en) Method for approximately estimating reliability of medium-voltage distribution network
CN109064071A (en) A kind of secondary system of intelligent substation methods of risk assessment based on shielding failure
Zhang et al. Fast search algorithm for key transmission sections based on topology converging adjacency matrix
CN106558874A (en) A kind of transformer station's reliability comprehensive estimation method towards management and running
CN110866739B (en) A Representation Method for Comprehensive Outage Time of Distribution Network Considering Fault Diagnosis Path
CN115224687B (en) Safety verification method and system for power outage maintenance of power transmission and transformation equipment below 220 kV
CN107565547A (en) A kind of power distribution network operation reliability evaluation and optimization system
CN103647279A (en) Plant wiring information based anticipatory fault set generation method
Zhang et al. Survey on Isolated Microgrid Prognostics and Health Management
CN116896161A (en) Emergency drilling management system for power grid disaster condition
CN115775047A (en) Regional power supply and demand analysis and prediction method, system and storage medium
CN115081237A (en) Reliability analysis method of aircraft power system based on GO method and common cause failure
Wang et al. Comprehensive evaluation and selection of offshore wind power DC collection system topology

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20210611