CN112905715A - Multi-dimensional evaluation method based on questionnaire and method thereof - Google Patents
Multi-dimensional evaluation method based on questionnaire and method thereof Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN112905715A CN112905715A CN202110183404.9A CN202110183404A CN112905715A CN 112905715 A CN112905715 A CN 112905715A CN 202110183404 A CN202110183404 A CN 202110183404A CN 112905715 A CN112905715 A CN 112905715A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- evaluator
- evaluated
- evaluation
- questionnaire
- person
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 71
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 17
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 claims description 32
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000000945 filler Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000008094 contradictory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/28—Databases characterised by their database models, e.g. relational or object models
- G06F16/283—Multi-dimensional databases or data warehouses, e.g. MOLAP or ROLAP
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/24—Querying
- G06F16/245—Query processing
- G06F16/2458—Special types of queries, e.g. statistical queries, fuzzy queries or distributed queries
- G06F16/2462—Approximate or statistical queries
Abstract
The invention belongs to the technical field of on-line questionnaire survey, and particularly relates to a questionnaire-based multi-dimensional evaluation method, which comprises the following steps: s1, importing and storing evaluation relations, S2, filling in questionnaires and presenting contents, S3: calculating an evaluation report; the invention can contain the evaluated person, the evaluator and the evaluation relationship among the evaluated persons, and can embody the relationship between the evaluator and the evaluated person in the evaluation report to form a multi-dimensional evaluation ladder system.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of questionnaire evaluation, and particularly relates to a multi-dimensional evaluation method based on questionnaires.
Background
Compared with the common questionnaire, the multi-dimensional evaluation questionnaire (360-degree evaluation) has the same recovery answer form and question type in the questionnaire, but the main difference is that the 360-degree evaluation is that the evaluated person and the evaluator have evaluation relationship. Different evaluators need to display the evaluated persons according to the matching of the evaluation relations, and 360-degree evaluation reports need to display comparison reports and personal reports of the evaluated persons according to the evaluation relations. The scheme provides a multi-dimensional assessment method based on questionnaires.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to solve the problems in the prior art, the invention provides a multi-dimensional assessment method based on questionnaires.
The technical scheme of the invention is realized as follows:
a questionnaire-based multidimensional assessment method comprises the following steps:
s1, importing and storing the evaluation relationship, and establishing three table storage spaces, wherein one table stores the information of the evaluated person, and the table storage fields comprise the name of the evaluated person, the questionnaire id, the id of the evaluated person and the department of the evaluated person; one of the tables stores evaluator information, and the table storage field includes: the system comprises an evaluator name, a questionnaire ID, an evaluator ID, an evaluator department, an evaluator special attribute field and a filling record field corresponding to evaluation; one table is used for storing user evaluation relations, and the table storage field comprises evaluated persons and the level relation among the evaluated persons; then, importing evaluation relations in sequence;
s2, filling in the questionnaire and presenting the content, firstly verifying the identity of the filling person by five methods including mail invitation, short message verification code login, password login, enterprise WeChat automatic login and the like; after passing the verification, acquiring an evaluator id of the filler; acquiring a corresponding evaluated person list according to the id and the content in the evaluation relation table; then, xml of the questionnaire is acquired, and the questionnaire content is generated.
S3: evaluation report calculation: each evaluator evaluates at least one evaluated person and divides the answer sheet into a plurality of answer sheet contents corresponding to the evaluated person; then, according to whether dimensions exist, the dimension weight and a score calculation method, calculating each subject of the evaluated person in the evaluation relation, wherein the score and the total score of each dimension are stored in one array, and meanwhile, calculating the evaluation scores given by other evaluators and storing the evaluation scores in the other array; calculating the score of the evaluated person in the same level according to the evaluation level in the evaluation relation; finally, obtaining the last score of the user according to the relation weight to obtain the personal report of a certain person; and obtaining a corresponding department personnel comparison report according to the personal report and the department of the evaluated person.
Further, when the evaluation relationship is introduced in step S1, the specific steps are as follows: a1 directly reads the content in excel, each row of content is respectively stored in different arrays, and the content of different rows is separated by a line-changing symbol;
a2: checking whether the content of each column has errors, firstly checking whether column titles exist, whether the corresponding evaluation relation of the column titles meets the requirements of the system, reading the row number of each column, wherein whether the columns of the evaluators are all less than or equal to the row number of the evaluated person, and if not, prompting to report errors; checking whether the evaluated person has repetition, and if so, prompting to report error; checking whether the name length of each evaluated person exceeds 64 characters, and if so, prompting an error;
a3, storing the evaluation relation in an sql database; reading a evaluated person each time, reading the corresponding evaluated person according to the corresponding row, separating the evaluated persons at the same level by using commas, and storing the separated evaluated persons in a database according to the evaluation relation between the evaluated person and the evaluated person; finally, updating the xml of the questionnaire according to the evaluated person, wherein the xml of the questionnaire can generate a multi-choice question of the evaluated person according to the list of the evaluated person; the line headings in the evaluation content behind the questionnaire are all associated with the multi-choice question.
Further, in the step S2, a specific method of identity verification is as follows: b1, when inviting the mail, firstly binding the mail address of the evaluator and storing the mail address in the attribute column of the evaluator table, then importing all mail addresses into the list of the sent mail, at the same time, randomly generating a short connection according to the userid of the evaluator to prevent the link from being too long and truncated, and storing the short connection in a new table, wherein the user of the content of the sent mail can define by user, the short connection corresponding to the evaluator must be added, and finally, when the writer opens the link address in the received mail, one-to-one matching can be carried out according to the evaluator id corresponding to the short connection, and identity verification is carried out;
b2, when the short message invitation is verified, firstly, the mobile phone number of the evaluator is bound and stored in the attribute column of the evaluator table, then a short connection is randomly generated according to the userid of the evaluator to prevent the link from being too long and cut off, and the short connection is stored in a new table, wherein the user sending the short message can define the short connection, the short connection corresponding to the evaluator must be added in the short connection, the mobile phone number and the short message are synchronized to a sending platform of a third party, and finally, after the writer receives the content of the short message, when the link address in the short connection is opened, the short connection corresponding to the evaluator id can be matched one by one to carry out identity verification;
b3, when password login authentication is performed, firstly, a corresponding password attribute of an evaluator is bound and stored in an evaluator attribute column, then a publisher acquires a uniform link, and after acquiring the link, a writer jumps to a corresponding password input page to perform password authentication;
b4, when the short message verification code is logged in and verified, firstly, the mobile phone number of an evaluator is bound and stored in the attribute column of the evaluator table, a user can obtain a uniform link address, a writer jumps to a short message verification page after clicking open the link, the verification code is obtained after inputting the mobile phone, and verification code matching is carried out at the rear end; if the input verification code is consistent with the verification code sent by the system, the input mobile phone number can be matched with the evaluator id corresponding to the system to authenticate the identity.
Further, in step S2, when the content is presented, according to the list of the evaluated persons, we will select the corresponding evaluated person of the first question by default, and at the same time, all the following associated questions can be displayed as the content of the evaluated person; in order to reduce misleading of a filling person, the first question is hidden, and the filling person can only see the content to be evaluated; this is a common answer sheet for the filler.
The scheme has the following effects:
compared with the common questionnaire in the prior art, the scheme can include the evaluated persons, the evaluators and the evaluation relationship among the evaluators and the evaluators, and can embody the relationship between the evaluators and the evaluators in the evaluation report to form a multi-dimensional evaluation ladder system.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a schematic flow chart of an embodiment 1 of a questionnaire-based multidimensional assessment method of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be described clearly and completely with reference to the accompanying drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments of the present invention without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
It should be noted that all the directional indicators (such as upper, lower, left, right, front and rear … …) in the embodiment of the present invention are only used to explain the relative position relationship between the components, the movement situation, etc. in a specific posture (as shown in the drawing), and if the specific posture is changed, the directional indicator is changed accordingly.
In addition, the descriptions related to "first", "second", etc. in the present invention are for descriptive purposes only and are not to be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly indicating the number of technical features indicated. Thus, a feature defined as "first" or "second" may explicitly or implicitly include at least one such feature. In addition, technical solutions between various embodiments may be combined with each other, but must be realized by a person skilled in the art, and when the technical solutions are contradictory or cannot be realized, such a combination should not be considered to exist, and is not within the protection scope of the present invention.
Example 1
As shown in fig. 1, a questionnaire-based multidimensional assessment method includes the following steps:
s1, importing and storing the evaluation relationship, and establishing three table storage spaces, wherein one table stores the information of the evaluated person, and the table storage fields comprise the name of the evaluated person, the questionnaire id, the id of the evaluated person and the department of the evaluated person; one of the tables stores evaluator information, and the table storage field includes: the system comprises an evaluator name, a questionnaire ID, an evaluator ID, an evaluator department, an evaluator special attribute field and a filling record field corresponding to evaluation; one table is used for storing user evaluation relations, and the table storage field comprises evaluated persons and the level relation among the evaluated persons; then, importing evaluation relations in sequence;
s2, filling in the questionnaire and presenting the content, firstly verifying the identity of the filling person by five methods including mail invitation, short message verification code login, password login, enterprise WeChat automatic login and the like; after passing the verification, acquiring an evaluator id of the filler; acquiring a corresponding evaluated person list according to the id and the content in the evaluation relation table; then, xml of the questionnaire is acquired, and the questionnaire content is generated.
S3: evaluation report calculation: each evaluator evaluates at least one evaluated person and divides the answer sheet into a plurality of answer sheet contents corresponding to the evaluated person; then, according to whether dimensions exist, the dimension weight and a score calculation method, calculating each subject of the evaluated person in the evaluation relation, wherein the score and the total score of each dimension are stored in one array, and meanwhile, calculating the evaluation scores given by other evaluators and storing the evaluation scores in the other array; calculating the score of the evaluated person in the same level according to the evaluation level in the evaluation relation; finally, obtaining the last score of the user according to the relation weight to obtain the personal report of a certain person; and obtaining a corresponding department personnel comparison report according to the personal report and the department of the evaluated person.
In the step S1, when the evaluation relationship is introduced, the specific steps are as follows: a1 directly reads the content in excel, each row of content is respectively stored in different arrays, and the content of different rows is separated by a line-changing symbol;
a2: checking whether the content of each column has errors, firstly checking whether column titles exist, whether the corresponding evaluation relation of the column titles meets the requirements of the system, reading the row number of each column, wherein whether the columns of the evaluators are all less than or equal to the row number of the evaluated person, and if not, prompting to report errors; checking whether the evaluated person has repetition, and if so, prompting to report error; checking whether the name length of each evaluated person exceeds 64 characters, and if so, prompting an error;
a3, storing the evaluation relation in an sql database; reading a evaluated person each time, reading the corresponding evaluated person according to the corresponding row, separating the evaluated persons at the same level by using commas, and storing the separated evaluated persons in a database according to the evaluation relation between the evaluated person and the evaluated person; finally, updating the xml of the questionnaire according to the evaluated person, wherein the xml of the questionnaire can generate a multi-choice question of the evaluated person according to the list of the evaluated person; the line headings in the evaluation content behind the questionnaire are all associated with the multi-choice question.
In the step S2, the specific method of identity authentication is as follows: b1, when inviting the mail, firstly binding the mail address of the evaluator and storing the mail address in the attribute column of the evaluator table, then importing all mail addresses into the list of the sent mail, at the same time, randomly generating a short connection according to the userid of the evaluator to prevent the link from being too long and truncated, and storing the short connection in a new table, wherein the user of the content of the sent mail can define by user, the short connection corresponding to the evaluator must be added, and finally, when the writer opens the link address in the received mail, one-to-one matching can be carried out according to the evaluator id corresponding to the short connection, and identity verification is carried out;
b2, when the short message invitation is verified, firstly, the mobile phone number of the evaluator is bound and stored in the attribute column of the evaluator table, then a short connection is randomly generated according to the userid of the evaluator to prevent the link from being too long and cut off, and the short connection is stored in a new table, wherein the user sending the short message can define the short connection, the short connection corresponding to the evaluator must be added in the short connection, the mobile phone number and the short message are synchronized to a sending platform of a third party, and finally, after the writer receives the content of the short message, when the link address in the short connection is opened, the short connection corresponding to the evaluator id can be matched one by one to carry out identity verification;
b3, when password login authentication is performed, firstly, a corresponding password attribute of an evaluator is bound and stored in an evaluator attribute column, then a publisher acquires a uniform link, and after acquiring the link, a writer jumps to a corresponding password input page to perform password authentication;
b4, when the short message verification code is logged in and verified, firstly, the mobile phone number of an evaluator is bound and stored in the attribute column of the evaluator table, a user can obtain a uniform link address, a writer jumps to a short message verification page after clicking open the link, the verification code is obtained after inputting the mobile phone, and verification code matching is carried out at the rear end; if the input verification code is consistent with the verification code sent by the system, the input mobile phone number can be matched with the evaluator id corresponding to the system to authenticate the identity.
Meanwhile, in the step S2, when the content is presented, according to the list of the evaluated persons, we will select the corresponding evaluated person of the first question by default, and at the same time, all the following related questions can be displayed with the content of the evaluated person; in order to reduce misleading of a filling person, the first question is hidden, and the filling person can only see the content to be evaluated; this is a common answer sheet for the filler.
Compared with the common questionnaire in the prior art, the scheme can include the evaluated persons, the evaluators and the evaluation relationship among the evaluators and the evaluators, and can embody the relationship between the evaluators and the evaluators in the evaluation report to form a multi-dimensional evaluation ladder system.
Finally, the above embodiments are only for illustrating the technical solutions of the present invention and not for limiting, although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the preferred embodiments, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that modifications or equivalent substitutions may be made to the technical solutions of the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the present invention, and all of them should be covered in the claims of the present invention.
Claims (4)
1. A questionnaire-based multidimensional assessment method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
s1, importing and storing the evaluation relationship, and establishing three table storage spaces, wherein one table stores the information of the evaluated person, and the table storage fields comprise the name of the evaluated person, the questionnaire id, the id of the evaluated person and the department of the evaluated person; one of the tables stores evaluator information, and the table storage field includes: the system comprises an evaluator name, a questionnaire ID, an evaluator ID, an evaluator department, an evaluator special attribute field and a filling record field corresponding to evaluation; one table is used for storing user evaluation relations, and the table storage field comprises evaluated persons and the level relation among the evaluated persons; then, importing evaluation relations in sequence;
s2, filling in the questionnaire and presenting the content, firstly verifying the identity of the filling person by five methods including mail invitation, short message verification code login, password login, enterprise WeChat automatic login and the like; after passing the verification, acquiring an evaluator id of the filler; acquiring a corresponding evaluated person list according to the id and the content in the evaluation relation table; then, xml of the questionnaire is acquired, and the questionnaire content is generated.
S3: evaluation report calculation: each evaluator evaluates at least one evaluated person and divides the answer sheet into a plurality of answer sheet contents corresponding to the evaluated person; then, according to whether dimensions exist, the dimension weight and a score calculation method, calculating each subject of the evaluated person in the evaluation relation, wherein the score and the total score of each dimension are stored in one array, and meanwhile, calculating the evaluation scores given by other evaluators and storing the evaluation scores in the other array; calculating the score of the evaluated person in the same level according to the evaluation level in the evaluation relation; finally, obtaining the last score of the user according to the relation weight to obtain the personal report of a certain person; and obtaining a corresponding department personnel comparison report according to the personal report and the department of the evaluated person.
2. The questionnaire-based multidimensional assessment method according to claim 1, wherein in the step S1, when importing the evaluation relationship, the specific steps are as follows: a1 directly reads the content in excel, each row of content is respectively stored in different arrays, and the content of different rows is separated by a line-changing symbol;
a2: checking whether the content of each column has errors, firstly checking whether column titles exist, whether the corresponding evaluation relation of the column titles meets the requirements of the system, reading the row number of each column, wherein whether the columns of the evaluators are all less than or equal to the row number of the evaluated person, and if not, prompting to report errors; checking whether the evaluated person has repetition, and if so, prompting to report error; checking whether the name length of each evaluated person exceeds 64 characters, and if so, prompting an error;
a3, storing the evaluation relation in an sql database; reading a evaluated person each time, reading the corresponding evaluated person according to the corresponding row, separating the evaluated persons at the same level by using commas, and storing the separated evaluated persons in a database according to the evaluation relation between the evaluated person and the evaluated person; finally, updating the xml of the questionnaire according to the evaluated person, wherein the xml of the questionnaire can generate a multi-choice question of the evaluated person according to the list of the evaluated person; the line headings in the evaluation content behind the questionnaire are all associated with the multi-choice question.
3. The questionnaire-based multidimensional assessment method according to claim 1, wherein in step S2, the specific method of identity verification is as follows: b1, when inviting the mail, firstly binding the mail address of the evaluator and storing the mail address in the attribute column of the evaluator table, then importing all mail addresses into the list of the sent mail, at the same time, randomly generating a short connection according to the userid of the evaluator to prevent the link from being too long and truncated, and storing the short connection in a new table, wherein the user of the content of the sent mail can define by user, the short connection corresponding to the evaluator must be added, and finally, when the writer opens the link address in the received mail, one-to-one matching can be carried out according to the evaluator id corresponding to the short connection, and identity verification is carried out;
b2, when the short message invitation is verified, firstly, the mobile phone number of the evaluator is bound and stored in the attribute column of the evaluator table, then a short connection is randomly generated according to the userid of the evaluator to prevent the link from being too long and cut off, and the short connection is stored in a new table, wherein the user sending the short message can define the short connection, the short connection corresponding to the evaluator must be added in the short connection, the mobile phone number and the short message are synchronized to a sending platform of a third party, and finally, after the writer receives the content of the short message, when the link address in the short connection is opened, the short connection corresponding to the evaluator id can be matched one by one to carry out identity verification;
b3, when password login authentication is performed, firstly, a corresponding password attribute of an evaluator is bound and stored in an evaluator attribute column, then a publisher acquires a uniform link, and after acquiring the link, a writer jumps to a corresponding password input page to perform password authentication;
b4, when the short message verification code is logged in and verified, firstly, the mobile phone number of an evaluator is bound and stored in the attribute column of the evaluator table, a user can obtain a uniform link address, a writer jumps to a short message verification page after clicking open the link, the verification code is obtained after inputting the mobile phone, and verification code matching is carried out at the rear end; if the input verification code is consistent with the verification code sent by the system, the input mobile phone number can be matched with the evaluator id corresponding to the system to authenticate the identity.
4. The questionnaire-based multidimensional assessment method according to claim 3, wherein in step S2, when content is presented, according to the list of evaluated subjects, we will default to select the corresponding evaluated subject of the first subject, and all the following associated subjects can be displayed with the content of the evaluated subject; in order to reduce misleading of a filling person, the first question is hidden, and the filling person can only see the content to be evaluated; this is a common answer sheet for the filler.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110183404.9A CN112905715A (en) | 2021-02-08 | 2021-02-08 | Multi-dimensional evaluation method based on questionnaire and method thereof |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110183404.9A CN112905715A (en) | 2021-02-08 | 2021-02-08 | Multi-dimensional evaluation method based on questionnaire and method thereof |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN112905715A true CN112905715A (en) | 2021-06-04 |
Family
ID=76124443
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110183404.9A Pending CN112905715A (en) | 2021-02-08 | 2021-02-08 | Multi-dimensional evaluation method based on questionnaire and method thereof |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN112905715A (en) |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN115426624A (en) * | 2022-11-07 | 2022-12-02 | 电子科大科园股份有限公司 | Automatic login method, device, equipment and storage medium |
| CN115630613A (en) * | 2022-12-19 | 2023-01-20 | 长沙冉星信息科技有限公司 | Automatic coding system and method for evaluation problems in questionnaire survey |
Citations (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101593295A (en) * | 2008-05-26 | 2009-12-02 | 北京六所和瑞科技发展有限公司 | A kind of questionnaire type computer-aided proposal estimating and examining system and evaluation method |
| JP2010262345A (en) * | 2009-04-30 | 2010-11-18 | Hitachi Software Eng Co Ltd | Evaluator selection system and evaluator evaluation system |
| CN105069543A (en) * | 2015-07-06 | 2015-11-18 | 黄河科技学院 | All perspective feedback evaluation assessment method based on grey clustering |
| JP6415681B1 (en) * | 2017-12-29 | 2018-10-31 | 株式会社経営人事パートナーズ | HR evaluation method and HR evaluation system |
| CN109284981A (en) * | 2018-09-25 | 2019-01-29 | 中建八局第二建设有限公司 | A kind of employee satisfaction survey questionnaire information system and method |
| CN110298595A (en) * | 2019-07-03 | 2019-10-01 | 广东倍智测聘网络科技股份有限公司 | A kind of various dimensions talent appraisal procedure and system |
| CN110443487A (en) * | 2019-07-31 | 2019-11-12 | 浙江工商职业技术学院 | A kind of Method of Teaching Appraisal and equipment |
| CN110610002A (en) * | 2019-08-12 | 2019-12-24 | 华中师范大学 | Questionnaire information processing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
-
2021
- 2021-02-08 CN CN202110183404.9A patent/CN112905715A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101593295A (en) * | 2008-05-26 | 2009-12-02 | 北京六所和瑞科技发展有限公司 | A kind of questionnaire type computer-aided proposal estimating and examining system and evaluation method |
| JP2010262345A (en) * | 2009-04-30 | 2010-11-18 | Hitachi Software Eng Co Ltd | Evaluator selection system and evaluator evaluation system |
| CN105069543A (en) * | 2015-07-06 | 2015-11-18 | 黄河科技学院 | All perspective feedback evaluation assessment method based on grey clustering |
| JP6415681B1 (en) * | 2017-12-29 | 2018-10-31 | 株式会社経営人事パートナーズ | HR evaluation method and HR evaluation system |
| CN111527505A (en) * | 2017-12-29 | 2020-08-11 | 人力资源管理株式会社 | Human material evaluation system |
| CN109284981A (en) * | 2018-09-25 | 2019-01-29 | 中建八局第二建设有限公司 | A kind of employee satisfaction survey questionnaire information system and method |
| CN110298595A (en) * | 2019-07-03 | 2019-10-01 | 广东倍智测聘网络科技股份有限公司 | A kind of various dimensions talent appraisal procedure and system |
| CN110443487A (en) * | 2019-07-31 | 2019-11-12 | 浙江工商职业技术学院 | A kind of Method of Teaching Appraisal and equipment |
| CN110610002A (en) * | 2019-08-12 | 2019-12-24 | 华中师范大学 | Questionnaire information processing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| 问卷星: "年中考核，如何考出真效果?", 《HTTPS://ZHUANLAN.ZHIHU.COM/P/144237307》, 28 May 2020 (2020-05-28), pages 1 - 8 * |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN115426624A (en) * | 2022-11-07 | 2022-12-02 | 电子科大科园股份有限公司 | Automatic login method, device, equipment and storage medium |
| CN115630613A (en) * | 2022-12-19 | 2023-01-20 | 长沙冉星信息科技有限公司 | Automatic coding system and method for evaluation problems in questionnaire survey |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN112905715A (en) | Multi-dimensional evaluation method based on questionnaire and method thereof | |
| Malka et al. | The association of religiosity and political conservatism: The role of political engagement | |
| Rutherford et al. | Ethical considerations of the legitimacy lie | |
| US20120079576A1 (en) | Authentication Method and Apparatus | |
| US20100281313A1 (en) | Dynamically generated web surveys for use with census activities, and assocated methods | |
| US7305427B2 (en) | Shipping address automation method | |
| US8762509B2 (en) | Digital data processing methods and systems for cultivating and providing guest feedback on rental accommodations | |
| CN105376287B (en) | Account data processing method, system and server | |
| Reid III et al. | An instrument to measure level 5 leadership | |
| US20190294640A1 (en) | Ranking system | |
| CN104462122A (en) | Test question data processing method and device | |
| CN107122445A (en) | Real-time question-and-answer game apparatus implementation method based on mobile phone | |
| CN101859420B (en) | The advertisement putting of content-based multimedia authentication codes, transaction system | |
| US20020095576A1 (en) | User recognition system | |
| CN107231358B (en) | Questionnaire data acquisition method, server and mobile terminal | |
| CN109815316B (en) | Examination information management system and method | |
| Al-Ameen et al. | A comprehensive study of the GeoPass user authentication scheme | |
| US20040143520A1 (en) | Method of incorporating an internet sales order with fundraising tally data | |
| CN106685810B (en) | A kind of implementation method improving withdrawing mail process safety | |
| CN113760944A (en) | Examination score query method and system | |
| Ullah et al. | Design, privacy and authentication of challenge questions in online examinations | |
| CN107454952A (en) | The system for carrying out benchmark test for the neurological susceptibility and feature based attribute and theme analyzed to social engineering | |
| JP2009059235A (en) | User authentication system | |
| US8311949B1 (en) | System, method, and apparatus for connecting users online based on familiarity or invitation | |
| Gaibulloev et al. | Do Failed or Weak States Favor Resident Terrorist Groups’ Survival? |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20210604 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |