CN112884306A - Method for evaluating teaching quality of teacher - Google Patents
Method for evaluating teaching quality of teacher Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN112884306A CN112884306A CN202110149797.1A CN202110149797A CN112884306A CN 112884306 A CN112884306 A CN 112884306A CN 202110149797 A CN202110149797 A CN 202110149797A CN 112884306 A CN112884306 A CN 112884306A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- evaluation
- teacher
- information
- data
- scale
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 47
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 192
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 27
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 208000007684 Occupational Stress Diseases 0.000 claims 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 241000123815 Lutjanus apodus Species 0.000 description 1
- 208000004077 Professional Burnout Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013480 data collection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009849 deactivation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012854 evaluation process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06395—Quality analysis or management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/20—Education
- G06Q50/205—Education administration or guidance
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Educational Technology (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Electrically Operated Instructional Devices (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to a method for evaluating the teaching quality of teachers, which comprises the following steps: acquiring the reference and test teacher information of each reference and test school, and importing the reference and test teacher information into a teacher evaluation template to determine a first number of target teachers of the reference and test; determining evaluation arrangement information of each school; the evaluation schedule information includes an evaluation time; starting a teacher evaluation template according to evaluation time, and acquiring first basic information and second basic information filled in by a second number of target teachers from a first number of target teachers; the second number is not greater than the first number; when the ratio of the second quantity to the first quantity meets a preset ratio threshold, collecting evaluation information of each teacher in a second quantity of target teachers; the evaluation information comprises evaluation data and evaluation progress data; and when the scale meets the preset conditions, performing multi-dimensional processing on the evaluation data according to the dimension to which the evaluation data belongs to obtain a teacher evaluation report.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of education evaluation, in particular to a method for evaluating the teaching quality of teachers.
Background
Education assessment, i.e., education measurement and evaluation, refers to a process of scientifically evaluating various education activities, education processes and education results implemented by means of measuring tools and techniques such as scales, questionnaires, surveys and the like according to an established index frame under the guidance of a certain education target.
The large-scale education assessment refers to the unified assessment of teacher teaching behaviors and school teaching environments of a plurality of regions, provinces, counties, schools and the like, provides a unified measuring scale for assessing education results of different regions, and provides references for teaching optimization and teaching reform.
At present, China makes great progress in education assessment, education assessment theories are gradually deepened, and education assessment practice activities are widely developed, but the problems of single mode, low assessment technical level and the like exist. In the education assessment, the assessment result is usually qualitative description, such as the teaching quality of teachers, and is often divided into qualified results, unqualified results and the like. The division standard is single, and a more detailed and specific evaluation report cannot be obtained.
Therefore, how to evaluate the teaching quality from the perspective of the teacher. The method is scientific, objective, reasonable, fair and fair as much as possible, and is a problem worthy of deep research.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a method for evaluating the teaching quality of teachers in order to solve the problems in the prior art, aiming at overcoming the defects in the prior art.
In a first aspect, the present invention provides a method for evaluating teaching quality of a teacher, including:
acquiring reference and test teacher information of each reference and test school, and importing the reference and test teacher information into a teacher evaluation template to determine a first number of target teachers of the reference and test;
determining evaluation arrangement information of each school; the evaluation schedule information includes an evaluation time;
starting a teacher evaluation template according to the evaluation time, and acquiring first basic information and second basic information filled by a second number of target teachers in the first number of target teachers; the second number is not greater than the first number;
judging whether the ratio of the second quantity to the first quantity meets a preset ratio threshold value or not;
when the ratio of the second quantity to the first quantity meets a preset ratio threshold, collecting evaluation information of each teacher in a second quantity of target teachers; the evaluation information comprises evaluation data and evaluation progress data;
judging whether the scale in the evaluation progress data meets a preset condition or not;
and when the scale meets the preset conditions, carrying out multi-dimensional processing on the evaluation data according to the dimension to which the evaluation data belongs to obtain a teacher evaluation report.
In a possible implementation manner, the meeting of the gauge with the preset condition specifically includes:
judging whether the grade suitable for the scale is consistent with the grade of actual use, whether the role suitable for the scale is consistent with the role of actual use, whether the scale lacks questions, and whether repeated scale records or question item records exist in the scale records;
and when the applicable grade of the scale is consistent with the actual using grade, the applicable role of the scale is consistent with the actual using role, the scale does not lack any question, and the record of the scale does not have repeated record of the scale or record of the question item, determining that the scale meets the preset condition.
In one possible implementation, the method further includes, before the step of:
acquiring an evaluation request, and acquiring an initialization teacher evaluation template according to the evaluation request; the initialized teacher evaluation template comprises an initialized object category, a level range and an index set;
acquiring first data, and updating the initialized object category according to the first data to obtain a first object category;
acquiring second data, and determining a first level range in the initialized level ranges according to the second data;
acquiring third data, determining a first evaluation index in an index set according to the third data, and acquiring a corresponding evaluation question according to the first evaluation index;
and obtaining a teacher evaluation template according to the first object category, the first level range and the evaluation question.
In one possible implementation manner, the object category includes any one of students, teachers, school managers and parents; the level range comprises province, city, district/county, school and class; the index set comprises teaching ability, professional pressure, professional environment support, professional burnout and teacher-student relationship.
In one possible implementation, the method further includes:
acquiring corresponding student information according to the class;
creating a student evaluation template for the student, and determining test question information of the student evaluation template;
acquiring answer information of students;
generating a student evaluation report according to the answer information of the student;
and displaying the teacher evaluation report and/or the student evaluation report.
In one possible implementation, before the collecting evaluation information of each teacher of the second number of target teachers, the method further includes:
and when any target teacher corresponds to the plurality of teacher evaluation templates, sequentially displaying the plurality of teacher evaluation templates according to a time sequence.
In one possible implementation, after the collecting evaluation information of each teacher in the second number of target teachers, the method further includes:
calculating the time interval of any two pieces of answer information, and generating first prompt information when the time interval is smaller than a preset minimum answer time threshold; and/or the presence of a gas in the gas,
and counting whether the answer of the test question meets the rule answering rule or not, and generating second prompt information when the answer does not meet the rule answering rule.
In a possible implementation manner, the dimensions include a primary dimension and a secondary dimension, the secondary dimension is a sub-dimension of the primary dimension, and when the scale meets a preset condition, performing multi-dimensional processing on the evaluation data according to the dimension corresponding to the evaluation data to obtain an evaluation report specifically includes:
according to the dimension of the evaluation data, obtaining the score of each secondary dimension in a plurality of secondary dimensions corresponding to each primary dimension;
calculating the score of the corresponding primary dimension according to the scores of the plurality of secondary dimensions;
obtaining a primary evaluation report of a target teacher according to the name of each primary dimension and the score of the primary dimension;
and obtaining a plurality of secondary evaluation reports of the target teacher according to the names of the plurality of secondary dimensions corresponding to each primary dimension and the average scores of the secondary dimensions.
In a second aspect, the invention provides an apparatus comprising a memory for storing a program and a processor for performing the method of any of the first aspects.
In a third aspect, the present invention provides a computer program product comprising instructions which, when run on a computer, cause the computer to perform the method according to any one of the first aspect.
In a fourth aspect, the invention provides a computer readable storage medium having stored thereon a computer program which, when executed by a processor, performs the method of any of the first aspects.
According to the method for evaluating the teaching quality of the teacher, the initialized teacher evaluation template can be configured, the teacher can be evaluated through the configured teacher evaluation template, and evaluation reports of multiple dimensionalities of the teacher are generated, so that the evaluation results are more scientific, objective, reasonable, fair and fair.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a flowchart for evaluating teaching quality of a teacher according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solution of the present invention is further described in detail by the accompanying drawings and embodiments.
In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention clearer, the present invention will be described in further detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, and it is apparent that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments.
The terms "first," "second," and the like in the description and claims of the present application and in the above-described drawings are used for distinguishing between different objects and not for describing a particular order. Furthermore, the terms "include" and "have," as well as any variations thereof, are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusions. For example, a process, method, system, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of steps or elements is not limited to only those steps or elements listed, but may alternatively include other steps or elements not listed, or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus.
The online evaluation corresponds to the traditional paper pen evaluation, which means that the configuration of an evaluation account and evaluation content is realized through an internet evaluation system, a user finishes answering and submitting after logging in through a webpage, an APP, an applet and the like, and the system realizes the evaluation form of automatic scoring, data collection and data calculation.
Fig. 1 is a flowchart of evaluating teaching quality of a teacher according to an embodiment of the present invention, where an execution main body of the present application may be a device having a calculation function and a display function, such as a terminal, where the terminal includes a wired terminal and a wireless terminal. The wireless terminal may be a handheld device having a wireless connection function or other processing device connected to a wireless modem, and the terminal communicates with one or more core networks through a Radio Access Network (RAN), or may access a distributed network in an ad hoc or unauthorized manner, or may access a wireless network in another manner to communicate, or may directly communicate with other terminals wirelessly. For example, the terminal may be a Mobile phone, a computer, a tablet computer, a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), a Mobile Internet Device (MID), a wearable Device, an electronic book reader (e-book reader), and the like. As another example, a wireless terminal may be a portable, pocket, hand-held, computer-included, or vehicle-mounted mobile device. The technical solution of the present invention is described in detail below with reference to fig. 1.
And step 110, acquiring the information of the reference and measurement teachers of all the reference and measurement schools, and importing the information of the reference and measurement teachers into a teacher evaluation template so as to determine a first number of target teachers of the current reference and measurement.
When a teacher in a certain area is to be evaluated, the area to be evaluated may be determined first, and then reference teacher information in the area is obtained, where the area includes, but is not limited to, province, city, district, and county, and the reference teacher information includes, but is not limited to, the school to which the teacher participating in evaluation belongs and the name of the reference teacher.
In a preferred scheme, the initialization teacher evaluation module needs to be initialized to obtain a teacher evaluation template, so that the teacher can answer questions through the teacher evaluation template, and the initialization teacher evaluation template is stored in the evaluation system and comprises initialized object types, level ranges and index sets. The initial evaluation module can be understood as a template with all information being initial values or information to be configured, and the evaluation process of the invention is a process of updating the initial values in the initial teacher evaluation template and configuring the information to be configured according to the acquired data, and finally creating a teacher evaluation template meeting the requirements. How to create the teacher evaluation template is described in detail below.
Firstly, acquiring an evaluation request, and acquiring an initialization teacher evaluation template according to the evaluation request; the initializing teacher assessment template includes an initialized object class, level range, and index set. And secondly, acquiring first data, and updating the initialized object category according to the first data to obtain a first object category. And thirdly, acquiring second data, and determining a first level range in the initialized level ranges according to the second data. And thirdly, third data are obtained, a first evaluation index in the index set is determined according to the third data, and a corresponding evaluation question is obtained according to the first evaluation index. And finally, obtaining a teacher evaluation template according to the first object category, the first level range and the evaluation questions.
The evaluation request may be an evaluation request sent by another terminal, or an evaluation request given by a way of dictation or paper-pen recording, which is not limited in this application. The evaluation request may include a category of the subject, a range of the level, and an index for which the evaluation is to be made.
The object can be understood as a group corresponding to the evaluation, the object category can be understood as a classification under the group, the level range can be understood as a region of the group, and the indexes can be those of the group to be evaluated.
And configuring the object type according to the first data in the acquired initial teacher evaluation template, wherein the configuration is required.
By way of example and not limitation, in initializing a teacher assessment template, the initialized object categories include students, teachers, school masters, parents. The first data may be a specified object class, and obtaining the first object class corresponds to determining what the object class is specifically in the initialized object class. For example, the first data is the word "teacher", or a speech including "teacher", or a sentence including "teacher", and after the terminal analyzes the speech or the sentence, the first object category can be obtained as the teacher, that is, the object targeted by the evaluation is the teacher.
In the initial teacher evaluation module, the level range may include province, city, district/county, and school, and the second data may be input multi-level data, and may include data of the province, city, district/county, and school where the evaluation object is located, such as the prefecture xx school in beijing city, so that the first level range may be determined.
The third data can be used for configuring specific indexes in the initial teacher evaluation template, the index set in the initial teacher evaluation template comprises teaching ability, occupation pressure, work power, occupation burnout, teacher-student relationship and professional environment support, the third data can comprise at least one of the indexes, and the specific indexes of the evaluation can be determined through the third data. And then, determining the test question information in the teacher evaluation template according to the specific indexes of the evaluation so as to obtain the evaluation data of the target teacher through the test question information.
In the application, in order to evaluate the teaching quality, an evaluation index can be set as a master condition of the teaching ability. In order to meet the evaluation requirement, the index may be set as needed, and how to set the index is specific, which is not limited in the present application.
Wherein the evaluation time is the time for starting the teacher evaluation template.
After the teacher evaluation template is started, the teacher can enter an evaluation state to be tested. The first basic information is indispensable information including school, name, gender, ethnicity, cell phone number, ages (year), first academic, whether first academic is a teacher's specialty, the highest academic, whether the highest academic is a teacher's specialty, whether a class owner or a task, an instructional subject 1: grade-class. The second basic information is filling information, which comprises an identity card number, a first school calendar graduation school, a first school calendar college category and a first school calendar graduation time. When filling in "any education subject", if the teacher teaches 2 or more subjects, the most subjects in class need to be filled in.
"grade class", if a teacher teaches more than one class in the same subject, all the classes in the subject need to be filled in on the same grid, for example, class 3 and class 5 in class 4 in class 1 in the subject, and "4-3 | 4-5" needs to be filled in on the grid "class 1 in the subject.
The first and highest scholars, including but not limited to senior high school, secondary school, major school, subject, master and above, and others;
college categories include, but are not limited to, advanced lot of this family, first lot of this family, second lot of this family, third lot of this family, specialty, others;
examination approaches include, but are not limited to, college entrance, self-examination, adult entrance, personal bibliography, job title, and others;
job title includes but is not limited to positive high, primary, secondary, tertiary, none.
It is understood that after each teacher logs in, there may be a plurality of teacher evaluation templates to be completed, and the plurality of teacher evaluation templates may be displayed on the terminal in chronological order.
If two templates to be evaluated exist in the zhang xx, the two templates can be simultaneously displayed. The display content comprises an evaluation name and an evaluation state, and the evaluation state comprises: the start-stop time was evaluated without start, during progress, or after completion. According to the method for evaluating the teaching quality of the teacher, the subsequent steps can be started only when the state is the to-be-completed state.
At this time, the teacher operates on a terminal loaded with a teacher evaluation template, and the terminal displays evaluation questions and answers the questions according to the question type rules after receiving the operation instruction.
The question type rules herein may include header footer display logic, question answering time calculation logic, question answering progress display logic, audio playing logic, test question prompt logic, single choice question logic, multiple choice question logic, check box question logic, digital memory question logic, attention level question logic, composition question logic, time choice question logic, percentage linkage question logic, attention continuation question logic, percentage choice question logic, question marking logic, pause button logic, and volume composition logic.
Header footer display logic that may be used to identify header and footer display logic in the teacher assessment template in the answer. The answer time calculation logic is for identifying logic for performing a calculation of the answer time in an answer. The answer progress display logic is used for identifying the logic for displaying the answer progress in the answer. Audio playback logic is used to identify logic for audio playback in an answer. And the test question prompt language logic is used for identifying the prompt logic of the prompt language in the answer. The single-choice question logic, the multiple-choice question logic, the check box question logic, the digital memory question logic, the attention level question logic, the combination question logic, the time selection question logic, the percentage linkage question logic, the attention continuation question logic, the percentage selection question logic and the marking question logic are used for identifying the display logic of various types of test questions in the answer. Pause button logic is used to identify pause button activation and deactivation logic in the answer. The group paper logic is used for identifying arrangement display logic among the different types of test questions.
In an optional embodiment, when the teacher answers, the teacher answers can be further regulated through prompt information.
Specifically, the time interval of any two pieces of answer information is calculated, and when the time interval is smaller than a preset minimum answer time threshold, first prompt information is generated; and/or the presence of a gas in the gas,
and counting whether the answer of the test question meets the rule answering rule or not, and generating second prompt information when the answer does not meet the rule answering rule.
The minimum answering time is used for detecting whether the teacher answers seriously in the answering process, playing a warning role and carrying out statistics and checking on corresponding roles.
If the answer time of the teacher is detected to be less than the minimum answer time in the process of answering the questions by the teacher, the system correspondingly prompts the XX teacher when the next question is made, and detects that the teacher possibly does not answer seriously and asks to answer seriously! The window disappears in 5 seconds, and even if the last question is detected, corresponding prompt is not made any more.
In addition, when the first prompt message appears, corresponding records are carried out, including recording of schools, grades, classes, mobile phone numbers, names and index names, and corresponding display can be carried out in monitoring pages of all roles including education managers, assessment responsible persons, operators, universities and teachers subsequently.
And the rule answering rule is generally used for judging whether the teacher answers the rule.
The detection rule is answered, two adjacent pages are generally detected, and corresponding prompts can be provided when a new page is made. And judging whether to answer the rule or not, wherein the preset configuration condition is needed to be seen, and the rule answering rule can be set according to the configuration condition.
The second prompt message of the law answering prompts the 'XX teacher' after finding the corresponding two-round law in the various law answering rules, and the system monitors that the system possibly does not answer seriously, please answer seriously! ", the window disappears in 5 seconds, and if the last question is detected in the regular answer, no prompt is given. Meanwhile, when the second prompt message appears, corresponding records are carried out, including recording the details of the name and the law response.
A ratio threshold is determined according to demographic indicators of the target teacher, such as character ages, school calendars, class masters, and teacher specialties, and then it may be determined whether a ratio of the second number to the first number meets the ratio threshold, and when the ratio threshold is met, step 150 is performed.
The evaluation data can be regarded as answer information, for example, the answer of the test question is ABABA.
In the process of answering, first evaluation progress data can be obtained through calculation according to the total number of the test questions and the current number of the answers, and/or second evaluation progress data can be obtained through calculation according to the total evaluation time and the current time spent, and the first evaluation progress data and the second evaluation progress data can be displayed through a scale.
And step 160, judging whether the scale in the evaluation progress data meets the preset conditions.
The judging whether the scale in the assessment progress data meets the preset conditions comprises judging whether the applicable grade of the scale is consistent with the actual using grade, whether the applicable role of the scale is consistent with the actual using role, whether the scale lacks questions, and whether repeated scale records or question item records exist in the scale records.
And 170, when the equivalent table meets the preset conditions, carrying out multi-dimensional processing on the evaluation data according to the dimension to which the evaluation data belongs to obtain a teacher evaluation report.
The dimensionality comprises a primary dimensionality and a secondary dimensionality, and the secondary dimensionality is a sub-dimensionality of the primary dimensionality. The evaluation report can be obtained specifically according to the following steps:
firstly, according to the dimension to which the evaluation data belongs, obtaining the score of each secondary dimension in a plurality of secondary dimensions corresponding to each primary dimension; secondly, calculating the score of the corresponding primary dimension according to the scores of the plurality of secondary dimensions; thirdly, obtaining a primary evaluation report of the target teacher according to the name of each primary dimension and the score of each primary dimension; and finally, obtaining a plurality of secondary evaluation reports of the target teacher according to the names of a plurality of secondary dimensions corresponding to each primary dimension and the average scores of the secondary dimensions.
For example, the first-level dimension includes teaching ability, and the corresponding second-level dimension includes teaching design ability, teaching implementation ability, teaching management ability, teaching evaluation ability, and teaching research ability, and the scores of the teaching design ability, the teaching implementation ability, the teaching management ability, the teaching evaluation ability, and the teaching research ability are calculated respectively, and the scores of the teaching design ability, the teaching implementation ability, the teaching management ability, the teaching evaluation ability, and the teaching research ability are summed to obtain the score of the teaching ability.
According to the method, the score of the index of each primary dimension is obtained, then the primary evaluation report is obtained according to the score and the number of people of the index of each primary dimension, and the secondary evaluation report of each secondary dimension corresponding to each primary dimension is obtained.
In a specific implementation manner, when the teaching quality of a teacher is evaluated, the learning quality of students of classes corresponding to the teacher can be evaluated, so that the teaching quality of the teacher is reflected by the learning quality side of the students, at this time, the student evaluation template can be obtained according to the similar steps of obtaining the evaluation template of the teacher, so that the students are evaluated, and the specific steps are as follows:
firstly, acquiring corresponding student information according to the class; secondly, creating a student evaluation template for the student, and determining test question information of the student evaluation template; thirdly, acquiring answer information of the student; thirdly, generating a student evaluation report according to the answer information of the student; and finally, displaying the teacher evaluation report and/or the student evaluation report. Therefore, the evaluation of the teaching quality of the teacher is assisted through the student evaluation report of the corresponding student. For example, when the logged-on user is a teacher, the viewable reports include: the evaluation teacher personal report comprises a first-level evaluation report and a second-level evaluation report; the class report of the class is evaluated; this test is evaluated the student report of this class.
According to the method for evaluating the teaching quality of the teacher, the initialized teacher evaluation template can be configured, the teacher can be evaluated through the configured teacher evaluation template, and evaluation reports of multiple dimensionalities of the teacher are generated, so that the evaluation results are more scientific, objective, reasonable, fair and fair.
The second embodiment of the invention provides equipment which comprises a memory and a processor, wherein the memory is used for storing programs, and the memory can be connected with the processor through a bus. The memory may be a non-volatile memory such as a hard disk drive and a flash memory, in which a software program and a device driver are stored. The software program is capable of performing various functions of the above-described methods provided by embodiments of the present invention; the device drivers may be network and interface drivers. The processor is used for executing a software program, and the software program can realize the method provided by the first embodiment of the invention when being executed.
A third embodiment of the present invention provides a computer program product including instructions, which, when the computer program product runs on a computer, causes the computer to execute the method provided in the first embodiment of the present invention.
The fourth embodiment of the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium, where a computer program is stored on the computer-readable storage medium, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the method provided in the first embodiment of the present invention is implemented.
Those of skill would further appreciate that the various illustrative components and algorithm steps described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented as electronic hardware, computer software, or combinations of both, and that the various illustrative components and steps have been described above generally in terms of their functionality in order to clearly illustrate this interchangeability of hardware and software. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the implementation. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the present invention.
The steps of a method or algorithm described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be embodied in hardware, a software module executed by a processor, or a combination of the two. A software module may reside in Random Access Memory (RAM), memory, Read Only Memory (ROM), electrically programmable ROM, electrically erasable programmable ROM, registers, hard disk, a removable disk, a CD-ROM, or any other form of storage medium known in the art.
The above-mentioned embodiments are intended to illustrate the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention in further detail, and it should be understood that the above-mentioned embodiments are merely exemplary embodiments of the present invention, and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention, and any modifications, equivalent substitutions, improvements and the like made within the spirit and principle of the present invention should be included in the scope of the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. A method for evaluating the teaching quality of a teacher is characterized by comprising the following steps:
acquiring reference and test teacher information of each reference and test school, and importing the reference and test teacher information into a teacher evaluation template to determine a first number of target teachers of the reference and test;
determining evaluation arrangement information of each school; the evaluation schedule information includes an evaluation time;
starting a teacher evaluation template according to the evaluation time, and acquiring first basic information and second basic information filled by a second number of target teachers in the first number of target teachers; the second number is not greater than the first number;
judging whether the ratio of the second quantity to the first quantity meets a preset ratio threshold value or not;
when the ratio of the second quantity to the first quantity meets a preset ratio threshold, collecting evaluation information of each teacher in a second quantity of target teachers; the evaluation information comprises evaluation data and evaluation progress data;
judging whether the scale in the evaluation progress data meets a preset condition or not;
and when the scale meets the preset conditions, carrying out multi-dimensional processing on the evaluation data according to the dimension to which the evaluation data belongs to obtain a teacher evaluation report.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the compliance of the gauge with the predetermined condition specifically comprises:
judging whether the grade suitable for the scale is consistent with the grade of actual use, whether the role suitable for the scale is consistent with the role of actual use, whether the scale lacks questions, and whether repeated scale records or question item records exist in the scale records;
and when the applicable grade of the scale is consistent with the actual using grade, the applicable role of the scale is consistent with the actual using role, the scale does not lack any question, and the record of the scale does not have repeated record of the scale or record of the question item, determining that the scale meets the preset condition.
3. The method of claim 1, further comprising, prior to the method:
acquiring an evaluation request, and acquiring an initialization teacher evaluation template according to the evaluation request; the initialized teacher evaluation template comprises an initialized object category, a level range and an index set;
acquiring first data, and updating the initialized object category according to the first data to obtain a first object category;
acquiring second data, and determining a first level range in the initialized level ranges according to the second data;
acquiring third data, determining a first evaluation index in an index set according to the third data, and acquiring a corresponding evaluation question according to the first evaluation index;
and obtaining a teacher evaluation template according to the first object category, the first level range and the evaluation question.
4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the object category includes any one of students, teachers, school managers, and parents; the level range comprises province, city, district/county, school and class; the index set comprises teaching ability, occupational stress, working dynamics, teacher-student relationship, professional environmental support and occupational fatigue.
5. The method of claim 4, further comprising:
acquiring corresponding student information according to the class;
creating a student evaluation template for the student, and determining test question information of the student evaluation template;
acquiring answer information of students;
generating a student evaluation report according to the answer information of the student;
and displaying the teacher evaluation report and/or the student evaluation report.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein prior to collecting assessment information for each of a second number of target teachers, the method further comprises:
and when any target teacher corresponds to the plurality of teacher evaluation templates, sequentially displaying the plurality of teacher evaluation templates according to a time sequence.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein after collecting assessment information for each of a second number of target teachers, the method further comprises:
calculating the time interval of any two pieces of answer information, and generating first prompt information when the time interval is smaller than a preset minimum answer time threshold; and/or the presence of a gas in the gas,
and counting whether the answer of the test question meets the rule answering rule or not, and generating second prompt information when the answer does not meet the rule answering rule.
8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the dimensions include a primary dimension and a secondary dimension, the secondary dimension is a sub-dimension of the primary dimension, and when the scale meets a preset condition, performing multi-dimensional processing on the evaluation data according to the dimension corresponding to the evaluation data to obtain an evaluation report specifically includes:
according to the dimension of the evaluation data, obtaining the score of each secondary dimension in a plurality of secondary dimensions corresponding to each primary dimension;
calculating the score of the corresponding primary dimension according to the scores of the plurality of secondary dimensions;
obtaining a primary evaluation report of a target teacher according to the name of each primary dimension and the score of the primary dimension;
and obtaining a plurality of secondary evaluation reports of the target teacher according to the names of the plurality of secondary dimensions corresponding to each primary dimension and the average scores of the secondary dimensions.
9. An apparatus comprising a memory for storing a program and a processor for performing the method of any one of claims 1-8.
10. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that the computer-readable storage medium has stored thereon a computer program which, when being executed by a processor, carries out the method of any one of claims 1 to 8.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110149797.1A CN112884306A (en) | 2021-02-03 | 2021-02-03 | Method for evaluating teaching quality of teacher |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110149797.1A CN112884306A (en) | 2021-02-03 | 2021-02-03 | Method for evaluating teaching quality of teacher |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN112884306A true CN112884306A (en) | 2021-06-01 |
Family
ID=76057030
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110149797.1A Pending CN112884306A (en) | 2021-02-03 | 2021-02-03 | Method for evaluating teaching quality of teacher |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN112884306A (en) |
-
2021
- 2021-02-03 CN CN202110149797.1A patent/CN112884306A/en active Pending
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Reinard | Communication research statistics | |
| Nuhfer et al. | Random number simulations reveal how random noise affects the measurements and graphical portrayals of self-assessed competency | |
| JP7077533B2 (en) | Learning support device, learning support system, learning support method and computer program | |
| Shelton et al. | Does DIBELS put reading first? | |
| CN112785192A (en) | Method for evaluating regional education quality | |
| McGrane et al. | Applying a thurstonian, two-stage method in the standardized assessment of writing | |
| Polat | Comparison of Performance Measures Obtained from Foreign Language Tests According to Item Response Theory vs Classical Test Theory. | |
| US20160019803A1 (en) | System, method and computer-accessible medium for scalable testing and evaluation | |
| CN112766807A (en) | Method for evaluating teaching quality of students | |
| KR101697929B1 (en) | Method of learning method offering refer cerebral cognitive style based on test results and recording medium storing program for executing the same, and recording medium storing program for executing the same, and printout for executing the same | |
| KR101716768B1 (en) | System and method for implicit memory test and recording medium storing program for executing the same, and recording medium storing program for executing the same, and printout for executing the same | |
| CN111553555A (en) | Training method, training device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| Hidayati | The Authenticity of English language assessment for the twelfth graders of SMK (Vocational High School) Negeri 4 Surakarta | |
| US10198428B2 (en) | Methods and systems for textual analysis | |
| CN112884306A (en) | Method for evaluating teaching quality of teacher | |
| Nevin et al. | Assessing the validity and reliability of dichotomous test results using Item Response Theory on a group of first year engineering students | |
| Yanfi et al. | User’s demographic characteristic on the evaluation of gamification interactive typing for primary school visually impaired with system usability scale | |
| Puchert et al. | Secondary education as a predictor of aptitude: Implications for selection in the automotive sector | |
| CN112785191A (en) | Method for evaluating management teaching quality of school leader | |
| Lamprianou | The tendency of individuals to respond to high-stakes tests in idiosyncratic ways | |
| van Diggelen | Effects of a self-assessment procedure on VET teachers' competencies in coaching students' reflection skills | |
| CN113919985A (en) | Evaluation method and device for teaching courses of numerical control machine tool, storage medium and processor | |
| CN112395115A (en) | Real-time result processing method and device, electronic equipment and computer readable medium | |
| CN111695090A (en) | Health education investigation evaluation system based on Android platform | |
| KR20090060874A (en) | Method of education analysis including chronometry and system for performing thereof |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |