CN112862642A - College education quality evaluation method, device and medium - Google Patents
College education quality evaluation method, device and medium Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN112862642A CN112862642A CN202110189346.0A CN202110189346A CN112862642A CN 112862642 A CN112862642 A CN 112862642A CN 202110189346 A CN202110189346 A CN 202110189346A CN 112862642 A CN112862642 A CN 112862642A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- evaluation
- colleges
- universities
- evaluation result
- score
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 42
- 238000013441 quality evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 7
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 255
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 24
- 238000003032 molecular docking Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 claims description 20
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000003062 neural network model Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000013210 evaluation model Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000001303 quality assessment method Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000001502 supplementing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000002996 emotional effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003930 cognitive ability Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000032683 aging Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000969 carrier Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004927 fusion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001755 vocal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/20—Education
- G06Q50/205—Education administration or guidance
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06395—Quality analysis or management
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Educational Technology (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Electrically Operated Instructional Devices (AREA)
Abstract
The application discloses a college education quality evaluation method, equipment and medium, comprising the following steps: determining the professions opened by colleges and universities, students corresponding to the professions and cooperative enterprises corresponding to the professions; formulating a first evaluation questionnaire based on the education policy and the administrative management policy so as to determine the quality of the education system of colleges and universities through a corresponding first evaluation result of colleges and universities; formulating a second evaluation questionnaire based on the teaching environment information and the employment direction information so as to determine the teaching quality of colleges and universities through second evaluation results corresponding to students; formulating a third evaluation questionnaire based on the course information and the training environment information so as to determine the docking degree of the colleges and universities and the cooperative enterprises according to a third evaluation result corresponding to the enterprises; and carrying out comprehensive scoring according to the first evaluation result, the second evaluation result, the third evaluation result and a preset scoring rule to obtain the education quality score of colleges and universities. The method can fully integrate the opinions of multiple parties to make comprehensive evaluation and well lay the ground for the matching of the posts.
Description
Technical Field
The application relates to the field of information matching, in particular to a method, equipment and medium for assessing education quality of colleges and universities.
Background
In recent years, research on the matching degree of education and profession in colleges and universities has been the focus of research worldwide. At present, even in a college with the cooperation of school and enterprise, the information is easily split among colleges and universities, students and enterprises, the matching degree of teaching content of colleges and universities and posts is low, students are difficult to integrate into posts after learning correspondingly, and talent demand information of enterprises is delayed.
Therefore, a method for comprehensive evaluation and comparison in three aspects for colleges, students and enterprises is needed to judge whether the current education culture quality is qualified, so that the education culture scheme can be adjusted in time for the colleges, students and enterprises.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to solve the above problems, namely to solve the problem that whether the education culture quality of the colleges and universities is qualified or not is difficult to judge by solving the problem that information cracks easily occur among colleges and universities, students and enterprises, the application provides a method, equipment and a medium for evaluating the education quality, which comprises the following steps:
in a first aspect, the present application provides a method for assessing education quality in colleges and universities, comprising: determining the professions opened by colleges and universities, students corresponding to the professions and cooperative enterprises corresponding to the professions; acquiring education policies and administrative management policies corresponding to the major, and making a first evaluation questionnaire based on the education policies and the administrative management policies so as to determine the quality of an education system of colleges and universities according to a first evaluation result corresponding to the colleges and universities; acquiring teaching environment information and employment direction information corresponding to the major, and formulating a second evaluation questionnaire based on the teaching environment information and the employment direction information so as to determine the teaching quality of colleges and universities according to a second evaluation result corresponding to the student; acquiring course information and training environment information corresponding to the major, and formulating a third evaluation questionnaire based on the course information and the training environment information so as to determine the docking degree of the colleges and universities and the cooperative enterprises according to a third evaluation result corresponding to the enterprises; and carrying out comprehensive scoring according to the first evaluation result, the second evaluation result, the third evaluation result and a preset scoring rule to obtain education quality scores of colleges and universities.
In one example, before performing comprehensive scoring according to the first evaluation result, the second evaluation result, the third evaluation result, and a preset scoring rule to obtain a college education quality score, the method further includes: determining a plurality of evaluation scores corresponding to each of the first evaluation questionnaire, the second evaluation questionnaire and the third evaluation questionnaire; eliminating the highest score and the lowest score in the multiple evaluation scores to obtain an average corresponding to the remaining evaluation scores; and determining a difference between a median of the plurality of evaluation scores and the mean; and if the difference is greater than a preset threshold corresponding to the evaluation questionnaire, taking the average as an evaluation result corresponding to the evaluation questionnaire, and if the difference is less than the preset threshold, taking the median as an evaluation result corresponding to the evaluation questionnaire.
In one example, the preset threshold corresponding to the first questionnaire for evaluation is not less than the preset threshold corresponding to the third questionnaire, and the preset threshold corresponding to the third questionnaire is greater than the preset threshold corresponding to the second questionnaire.
In one example, after determining, for each of the first evaluation questionnaire, the second evaluation questionnaire, and the third evaluation questionnaire, a plurality of evaluation scores corresponding to the evaluation questionnaire, the method further includes: determining a number of the second assessment questionnaire; if the number of the second evaluation questionnaires is smaller than a first preset number, acquiring a plurality of second reference evaluation questionnaires, and supplementing the second reference evaluation questionnaires to the second evaluation questionnaires, wherein the second reference evaluation questionnaires are filled in by graduation students corresponding to the major; acquiring the number of the third assessment questionnaires; and if the number of the third evaluation questionnaires is less than a second preset number, acquiring a plurality of third reference evaluation questionnaires, and supplementing the third reference evaluation questionnaires to the third evaluation questionnaires, wherein the third reference evaluation questionnaires are filled by a third party authority.
In one example, the comprehensive scoring is performed according to the first evaluation result, the second evaluation result, the third evaluation result, and a preset scoring rule to obtain a college education quality score, and specifically includes: determining a weight scheme corresponding to the specialty from a plurality of preset weight schemes, wherein the weight scheme comprises weights corresponding to the first evaluation result, the second evaluation result and the third evaluation result respectively; and obtaining a comprehensive score according to the weight scheme, the first evaluation result, the second evaluation result and the third evaluation result, and taking the comprehensive score as a college education quality score.
In one example, the method further comprises: if the education quality score of the colleges and universities is larger than the estimation score, reducing the weight corresponding to the first evaluation result and/or the weight corresponding to the third evaluation result, and improving the weight corresponding to the second evaluation result to obtain a corrected weight scheme; summing the first evaluation result, the second evaluation result and the third evaluation result according to the modified weight scheme to obtain a modified comprehensive score; taking the corrected comprehensive score as a reference score of the education quality score of colleges and universities; and if the reference score of the education quality score of the colleges and universities is smaller than the estimated score, replacing the weight scheme corresponding to the profession with the modified weight scheme.
In one example, after performing comprehensive scoring according to the first evaluation result, the second evaluation result, the third evaluation result, and a preset scoring rule, and obtaining a college education quality score, the method further includes: generating a college education quality feedback model according to the college education quality scores, wherein the feedback model comprises three aspects of colleges, students and enterprises, and the college aspect at least comprises: policy enforcement dimension, administrative dimension, the student aspect includes at least: learning experience dimension, employment dimension, the business aspect including at least: a course design participation dimension, a course execution participation dimension and a course feedback participation dimension; acquiring a plurality of low-score items in each dimension, and generating an improvement suggestion aiming at any one of the plurality of low-score items, wherein the improvement suggestion comprises the following steps: at least one of college improvement points, student improvement points and enterprise improvement points.
In one example, the method further comprises: obtaining an estimated third evaluation result according to a third evaluation result of the previous year and a pre-trained estimated evaluation model, wherein the estimated evaluation model is obtained by performing supervision training according to corresponding course information and training environment information; if the difference between the third evaluation result and the estimated third evaluation result is greater than a preset reasonable difference, acquiring the related information of the enterprise, wherein the related information at least comprises: change information of enterprise responsible persons and enterprise operation condition information; analyzing the relevant information through a pre-trained neural network model to obtain an analysis result; if the analysis result shows that the annual variation value of the enterprise is larger than a preset reasonable variation value, a prompt is sent to the due graduates corresponding to the profession, and the prompt shows that the due graduates have higher risk compared with the previous year if the enterprise is in employment.
On the other hand, this application has proposed a colleges and universities' education quality evaluation equipment, includes: at least one processor; and a memory communicatively coupled to the at least one processor; wherein the memory stores instructions executable by the at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to perform a method as in any one of the above examples.
In another aspect, the present application provides a non-volatile computer storage medium storing computer-executable instructions for education quality assessment in colleges and universities, the computer-executable instructions configured to: a method as in any preceding example.
The method, the equipment and the medium for assessing the education quality of colleges and universities can bring the following beneficial effects: the system can fully integrate opinions of colleges, students and enterprises, comprehensively evaluate the education quality of colleges according to the actual conditions of the three parties, promote the colleges to actively improve education guidelines, promote the students to actively deal with the social situation, promote the enterprises to actively participate in college education, and provide a good foundation for post matching. In addition, the technical scheme recorded in the application can also ensure the authenticity of data as much as possible, so that the college education quality evaluation can truly display the true conditions of three parties, and the conditions of unreasonable evaluation and unrealistic evaluation are avoided.
Drawings
The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the application and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this application, illustrate embodiment(s) of the application and together with the description serve to explain the application and not to limit the application. In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow chart of a method for assessing education quality in colleges and universities according to an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of an apparatus for education quality assessment in colleges and universities in the embodiment of the present application.
Detailed Description
In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present application more apparent, the technical solutions of the present application will be described in detail and completely with reference to the following specific embodiments of the present application and the accompanying drawings. It should be apparent that the described embodiments are only some of the embodiments of the present application, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present application.
In recent years, research on the matching degree and the fusion degree between education and profession in colleges and universities has rapidly become a focus of research in china and the world. In the last two thirty years, problems of global competition aggravation, technical talent adjustment, population aging and the like cause that it is difficult to find suitable talents to do suitable work in the labor market. The economic structure and the development stage in society are different, and the number and the types of employment posts which can be provided also have difference. In the current education mode, the cooperation of schools and enterprises becomes one of the ways of developing education in most colleges, so that the comprehensive evaluation of the education quality of the colleges by combining the practical situations of three parties, namely colleges, students and enterprises, becomes an important index for the success of the education of the colleges. By combining the actual conditions of the three parties for evaluation and targeted adjustment, talents can be cultured according to the labor market demand really in colleges and universities, students can make targeted learning according to the current market demand, and enterprises provide targeted suggestions for education modes and established courses of colleges and universities, so that the colleges and the enterprises are really put into practice to cooperate, and real 'people and posts matching' is realized.
It should be noted that, in the embodiment of the present application, the method for assessing the education quality of colleges and universities is stored in a corresponding system, a user may log in the system through a terminal, the terminal may be a hardware device having a corresponding function, such as a smart phone, a tablet computer, and a personal computer, the system may be pre-installed in the terminal, and the user may log in the system through an APP, a corresponding WEB site, and the like, so as to achieve assessment of the education quality of colleges and universities. The technical solutions provided by the embodiments of the present application are described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
As shown in fig. 1, an embodiment of the present application provides a method for assessing education quality in colleges and universities, including:
s101, determining the profession set up by the colleges and universities, students corresponding to the profession and cooperative enterprises corresponding to the profession.
Generally, in order to better evaluate the education quality of colleges and universities, a specialty set up by a college and university needs to be determined, and then students corresponding to the specialty and cooperative enterprises corresponding to the specialty are acquired based on the specialty. In general, general colleges, and vocational colleges may be provided with many types of disciplines including, but not limited to, for example: the disciplines in large scope such as philosophy, history, literature, art, education, law, economics, management, science, engineering, agriculture, medicine, military science and the like specifically include many types of specific specialties, and the specialties are not limited herein. The cooperative enterprises corresponding to colleges and universities can be enterprises cooperating for disciplinary departments and can also be enterprises cooperating for specific specialties, and the technical scheme recorded in the application can be adjusted in a targeted manner according to actual conditions.
Specifically, in the embodiment of the present application, a specific specialty is taken as an example for explanation, the specialty corresponds to a plurality of students, the students may include all students reading all levels of the specialty of the college, and the corporation corresponding to the specialty may be one or a plurality of, which is not limited herein.
S102, obtaining education policies and administrative management policies corresponding to the major, and making a first evaluation questionnaire based on the education policies and the administrative management policies, so that the quality of the education system of colleges and universities is determined according to a first evaluation result corresponding to the colleges and universities.
Colleges and universities play an important role in teaching as direct providers of education, and therefore a first assessment questionnaire for colleges and universities needs to be formulated to assess the teaching quality of the colleges and universities.
Specifically, an education policy and an administrative policy corresponding to a professional are acquired. The education policy can be a college education policy issued by the country and/or province, and the policy is used as a pilot of college education and is a policy which needs to be referred to most by the college education. By judging whether the current education policy conforms to the national standard, whether the current education policy conforms to the political position, whether policy synchronization is achieved before different education institutions, whether legislation and regulations are met, whether scientific research data are formulated, whether training and practice of teachers can be guided, and the like, whether the direction of the current education policy is accurate and whether colleges and universities need to make adaptive adjustment according to actual conditions can be judged.
The administrative policy is the first captain for education in colleges and universities, and is the most important policy for colleges and universities. Whether the administrative policy of colleges and universities is reasonable and can become the impetus of college education instead of resistance can be judged by judging whether the current administrative policy is correctly interpreted and/or responds to the education policy, whether a perfect management method is established for teaching workers and students, whether reasonable subsidies are provided for teaching workers and students with corresponding requirements, whether requirements of fairness and moral standards are complied with, whether education quality detection indexes are complied with and the like.
Further, a first evaluation questionnaire may be formulated for the education policies and the administrative policies, and the first evaluation questionnaire may be filled in by related persons in the college university, which may include a school leader member, a school party committee organization member, a front line instructor member, a logistical staff, and the like. The first evaluation questionnaire may be issued in a certain proportion according to various types of members of the high school party, or may be specifically issued for a certain type of member, and the specific issuing manner is not limited herein.
The first evaluation questionnaire comprises a plurality of corresponding items, and evaluation can be performed through an objective scoring system and/or a subjective filling system, which is not limited herein. In the embodiment of the application, a plurality of objective scoring questions can be formulated according to education policies and administrative policies, and the objective scoring questions are calculated in a Lektet table mode. For any one of the objective scoring questions, there may be a score selection range of three, five, seven or other grades, which is not limited herein. And accumulating the final scores of the objective grading questions to obtain the final score of the first evaluation questionnaire.
And generating a first evaluation result according to the final scores of all the first evaluation questionnaires, wherein the first evaluation result can reflect the quality of the education system of colleges and universities. For example, a first evaluation of between 85 and 100 points may rate the college education system as excellent, between 75 and 84 points may rate the college education system as good, between 60 and 74 points may rate the college education system as medium, and below 60 points may rate the college education system as poor.
S103, obtaining teaching environment information and employment direction information corresponding to the major, and formulating a second evaluation questionnaire based on the teaching environment information and the employment direction information so as to determine the teaching quality of colleges and universities through the second evaluation questionnaire corresponding to the students.
Students are the direct carriers of education, and the growth and harvest of the students are important indexes for evaluating the education quality of colleges and universities, so a second evaluation questionnaire for the students needs to be made to evaluate the teaching quality of the colleges and universities.
Specifically, teaching environment information and employment direction information corresponding to a specialty are acquired. The teaching environment is used as a carrier for students to receive education, and the quality of the atmosphere of the teaching environment profoundly influences the education quality of the students. Whether the current teaching environment can create a high-quality and high-efficiency learning hotbed for the students and whether corresponding adjustment can be made according to the real requirements of the students can be judged by judging whether the current teaching environment is high-quality, whether excellent teaching equipment is provided, whether achievement achieved by the students can be encouraged, whether the students are allowed to participate in making teaching guidelines, whether the teaching mode of an educator is changed according to the feedback of the students, whether teachers with excellent quality are equipped, whether the education method is customized for the students, whether extra-class activity learning can be enhanced, and whether the investability and the enthusiasm of learning can be promoted.
The employment direction is used as the value of receiving education of students, and the truth and competence of the students in the current employment direction and the adaptability of going to the society in the future can be judged by judging whether the students in the current employment direction have corresponding behavior ability, have corresponding cognitive ability, have corresponding emotional ability and have the employment ability of the general industry.
Further, a second evaluation questionnaire may be formulated for the teaching environment information and the employment direction information, and the second evaluation questionnaire may be filled in by students who have read in the specialty of the colleges and universities, and the students may include students of any level. The second evaluation questionnaire may be issued in a certain proportion according to the level, or may be issued specifically for students of a certain level, and the specific issuing manner is not limited herein.
The second evaluation questionnaire comprises a plurality of corresponding items, and evaluation can be performed through an objective scoring system and/or a supervisor filling system, which is not limited herein. In the embodiment of the application, a plurality of objective scoring questions can be formulated according to the teaching environment information and employment direction information, and the objective scoring questions are calculated in a Liktet table mode. For any one of the objective scoring questions, there may be a score selection range of three, five, seven or other grades, which is not limited herein. And accumulating the final scores of the objective grading questions to obtain the final score of the second evaluation questionnaire.
And generating a second evaluation result according to the final scores of all the second evaluation questionnaires, wherein the second evaluation result can reflect the teaching quality of colleges and universities. For example, the second evaluation result may be 85 to 100 points that can rate the teaching quality of colleges and universities as excellent, 75 to 84 points that can rate the teaching quality of colleges and universities as good, 60 to 74 points that can rate the teaching quality of colleges and universities as medium, and 60 points or less that can rate the teaching quality of colleges and universities as poor.
S104, obtaining course information and training environment information corresponding to the major, and making a third evaluation questionnaire based on the course information and the training environment information, so that the docking degree of the colleges and universities and the cooperative enterprises is determined through a third evaluation result corresponding to the enterprises.
In order to ensure that college education can cultivate talents meeting the needs of enterprises, the participation degree of the enterprises in the college education process is also very important.
Specifically, course information and training environment information corresponding to a specialty are acquired. The course is used as the first source of post skills, and whether the course setting is scientific or not also determines the degree of post matching. By judging whether the enterprise participates in the course standard formulation, whether the enterprise participates in the examination test mode formulation, whether the enterprise participation mode is qualified, whether the enterprise participation quality reaches the standard, whether the enterprise collects the learning information aiming at the course and whether the enterprise improves the learning time line aiming at the course in the current course, whether the enterprise participation degree reaches the standard and whether the course needs to be adjusted aiming at the change of the social and economic situation can be judged.
The training environment is used as a platform for students to exercise the skills of posts, and the quality of the training environment also determines the adaptability of the students to future posts. By judging whether the current training environment is self-helped by an enterprise, whether the enterprise provides teaching equipment, whether the enterprise provides a shared teacher or not and whether the enterprise makes a practice test or not, whether the enterprise has proper acting or not in the current training environment and whether the training environment needs to be improved according to the changes of social and economic situations and post skills can be judged.
Further, a third evaluation questionnaire may be formulated for the course information and the training environment information, and the third evaluation questionnaire may be filled by related personnel in the enterprise, where the related personnel may include enterprise management members, enterprise front-line operation members, enterprise human department members, enterprise engineer members, and the like. The third evaluation questionnaire may be issued in a certain proportion according to various types of members of the enterprise side, or may be specifically issued for a certain type of member, and the specific issuing manner is not limited herein.
The third evaluation questionnaire comprises a plurality of corresponding items, and evaluation can be performed through an objective scoring system and/or a supervisor filling system, which is not limited herein. In the embodiment of the application, a plurality of objective scoring questions can be formulated according to the course information and the training environment information, and the objective scoring questions are calculated in a Lekter table mode. For any one of the objective scoring questions, there may be a score selection range of three, five, seven or other grades, which is not limited herein. And accumulating the final scores of the objective scoring points to obtain the final score of a third evaluation questionnaire.
And generating a third evaluation result according to the final scores of all the third evaluation questionnaires, wherein the third evaluation result can reflect the docking degree of colleges and universities and cooperative enterprises. For example, a third evaluation of 85-100 points may rate the degree of docking as excellent, 75-84 points may rate the degree of docking as good, 60-74 points may rate the degree of docking as medium, and 60 points or less may rate the degree of docking as poor.
And S105, carrying out comprehensive scoring according to the first evaluation result, the second evaluation result, the third evaluation result and a preset scoring rule to obtain education quality scores of colleges and universities.
Before comprehensive scoring, a first evaluation result, a second evaluation result and a third evaluation result are acquired. The first evaluation questionnaire, the second evaluation questionnaire and the third evaluation questionnaire respectively comprise a plurality of evaluation questionnaires, and each evaluation questionnaire corresponds to an evaluation score. In the embodiment of the present application, a process of generating a first evaluation result by a first evaluation questionnaire is taken as an example for explanation.
Specifically, the first evaluation questionnaire filled in by the college corresponds to a plurality of evaluation scores, and for the plurality of evaluation scores, the highest score and the lowest score of the plurality of evaluation scores may be removed, the average of the remaining evaluation scores may be obtained, and the median of the remaining evaluation scores may be obtained.
Further, the difference between the average number and the median is obtained, it should be noted that the difference result should be a positive number, and if the difference is a negative number, the absolute value of the negative number is taken as the difference.
Furthermore, if the difference is greater than the preset threshold corresponding to the first evaluation questionnaire, it indicates that the remaining evaluation scores are not the normal distribution of the comparison standard, and if the median is taken as the first evaluation result, it is difficult to reflect the true result corresponding to the first evaluation questionnaire, so the average is taken as the first evaluation result. If the difference value is smaller than the preset threshold value corresponding to the first evaluation questionnaire, the remaining evaluation scores are shown to be in the normal distribution of the comparison standard, and at the moment, the median is taken as the first evaluation result, so that the method is more scientific and can display the real first evaluation result.
The second evaluation result corresponding to the second evaluation questionnaire and the third evaluation result corresponding to the third evaluation questionnaire are obtained in the above manner, and are not described herein again.
After the first evaluation result, the second evaluation result and the third evaluation result are obtained, the weight scheme corresponding to the specialty can be obtained from the plurality of pre-stored weight schemes, the first evaluation result, the second evaluation result and the third evaluation result are summed according to the weight scheme to obtain a comprehensive score, and the comprehensive score is used as an education quality score of colleges and universities. Wherein, the weighting scheme may include: the weight corresponding to the first evaluation result, the weight corresponding to the second evaluation result and the weight corresponding to the third evaluation result.
In general, the number of students corresponding to different professions is different, the number and scale of corresponding cooperative enterprises are also different, and if the same weighting scheme is adopted, the obtained comprehensive score is difficult to reflect the real education quality of colleges and universities. Therefore, different weighting schemes can be set for different professions, for example, for professions with fewer students and smaller scale of cooperative enterprises, the weighting corresponding to the second evaluation result and the weighting corresponding to the third evaluation result are increased, and the weighting corresponding to the first evaluation result is decreased, so that the speaking right of the student and the enterprise is larger, the speaking right of the school is reduced, and the situation that the school is excessively high and the education quality score of colleges and universities is falsely high is prevented. It should be noted that, for the adjustment ranges of the three weights, corresponding adjustment can be performed according to actual situations, as long as the final weight proportion is most scientific and can reflect the true education quality score of colleges and universities, and the specific numerical values are not limited herein.
In one embodiment, a preset threshold corresponding to the evaluation questionnaire is used for determining whether the average or median of the remaining evaluation scores is used as the evaluation result. A reasonable and scientific evaluation score should be a more standard normal distribution, so that an evaluation score closer to a normal distribution is more reliable. Based on years of experience of colleges and universities, the situation of super-high score or super-low score is rarely found in the corresponding first questionnaire, so that the stability of colleges and universities is highest, enterprises are used as the productivity of society, the probability of super-high score or super-low score is relatively low in the corresponding third questionnaire, the stability of the third questionnaire is only second to colleges and universities, and students are used as the party with the minimum average age among three members, the phenomenon of emotional transformation is serious, and the situation of super-high score or super-low score of the second questionnaire is easy to occur due to personal conditions. Therefore, in the current educational environment, the stability of the school side is greater than or equal to that of the enterprise side, and the stability of the enterprise side is greater than that of the students.
In view of the above situation, the preset threshold corresponding to the first questionnaire for evaluation is set to be greater than or equal to the preset threshold corresponding to the third questionnaire, and the preset threshold corresponding to the third questionnaire is set to be greater than the preset threshold corresponding to the second questionnaire. Through the technical scheme recorded by the embodiment, the three evaluation results can be obtained more scientifically and accurately, and the three evaluation results can reflect the real situation better.
In one embodiment, in some cold professions, the number of students for that profession tends to be very small, and thus the number of second assessment questionnaires may be very limited. In order to ensure the diversity of the samples, in the embodiment of the present application, after the number of the second evaluation questionnaires is obtained, if the number of the second evaluation questionnaires is smaller than the first preset number, it indicates that the number of the second evaluation questionnaires is too small to reflect the situation of the real student. Based on this, the second evaluation questionnaire can be issued to graduates corresponding to the specialty, and a certain number of graduates fill in the second evaluation questionnaire as a second reference evaluation questionnaire to be supplemented to the second evaluation questionnaire. It should be noted that the second assessment questionnaire filled by the graduates can be completely the same as the original second assessment questionnaire, and the contents of the questionnaire can be adjusted correspondingly for the graduates, so that the situation that the graduates who do not know the current student situation fill out in disorder is prevented. In addition, the first preset number may be adjusted according to actual situations, and specific values thereof are not limited herein.
In one embodiment, the third assessment questionnaire filled out by the business party may be in short quantity when large personnel changes occur inside the business or the size of the business is small. In order to ensure the diversity of the samples, in the embodiment of the present application, after the number of the third evaluation questionnaires is obtained, if the number of the third evaluation questionnaires is smaller than the second preset number, it indicates that the number of the current third evaluation questionnaires is too small to reflect the situation of the real enterprise side. Based on this, the third evaluation questionnaire can be sent to the third party authority, and the third party authority fills in the third evaluation questionnaire as a third reference evaluation questionnaire to be supplemented to the third evaluation questionnaire. It should be noted that a third-party authority that is sufficiently known to the enterprise should be selected to fill in the third reference evaluation questionnaire, and the content of the questionnaire may be completely the same as the original third evaluation questionnaire, or may be adjusted in a targeted manner. In addition, the second preset number may be adjusted specifically according to actual situations, and specific values thereof are not limited herein.
In one embodiment, while adjustments have been made to the college educational quality scores as in the above embodiments to make them reflect the truest as possible, it is possible that the college educational quality scores are falsely high, which is more likely that the college or business side fills in a falsely high score due to political or performance requirements. Therefore, to solve the problem, an estimated score corresponding to a specialty can be set, and the estimated score can be obtained by multiplying the education quality score corresponding to the specialty in the colleges and universities by a preset annual growth coefficient according to the previous year. For example, if the education quality score of the college of the last year is 65, the annual growth coefficient can be set to 1.3, and the estimated score is 84.5. If the current education quality score of the colleges is larger than the estimated score, the score is accelerated too fast, and a false score is possibly generated.
Therefore, when the education quality score of the colleges and universities is larger than the pre-estimated score, the weight corresponding to the first evaluation result and/or the weight corresponding to the third evaluation result can be reduced, and the weight corresponding to the second evaluation result can be increased to obtain a corrected weight scheme. And summing the first evaluation result, the second evaluation result and the third evaluation result according to the corrected weight scheme to obtain a corrected comprehensive score, and taking the corrected comprehensive score as a reference score of the education quality score of colleges and universities. If the reference score of the high-efficiency education quality score is smaller than the estimated score, the evaluation score corresponding to the college party and the enterprise party is obviously higher than the evaluation score corresponding to the student party, and at the moment, in order to prevent the situation that the education quality score of the next year appears false score again, the weight scheme corresponding to the specialty can be replaced by the corrected weight scheme, so that the situation of false high score is avoided, meanwhile, the warning effect on the college party and the enterprise party can be achieved, and the college party and the enterprise party are prompted to fill in the truest score.
By the embodiment described in the embodiment, under the condition that the grading acceleration is too fast and false high scores are likely to occur, the speaking right of a high school party and an enterprise party can be reduced by adjusting the weight corresponding to the evaluation result, the speaking right of a student party is improved, and the real condition can be reflected more favorably. It should be noted that the reference score of the education quality score of colleges is not used as the final result, but is used as a reference. In addition, the annual growth coefficient can be flexibly adjusted according to actual conditions, and the specific numerical value is not limited herein.
In one embodiment, after the college education quality score is obtained, a college education quality feedback model can be generated according to the score, and the feedback model can be presented in any mode of a histogram, a pie chart, a three-dimensional graph and the like. The feedback model may include three aspects of colleges, students, and enterprises, wherein the aspects of colleges at least include: policy execution dimension, administrative dimension, student's aspect includes at least: learning experience dimension and employment dimension, and the enterprise aspect at least comprises: course design participation dimension, course execution participation dimension, and course feedback participation dimension. The multi-dimension content can be obtained from specific contents in the first evaluation questionnaire, the second evaluation questionnaire and the third evaluation questionnaire, and high items or low items of multiple dimensions can be fed back.
In one embodiment, after generating the feedback model of education quality of colleges and universities, a number of low-scoring items in each dimension in the feedback model may be obtained, and an improvement suggestion may be generated for any one of the number of low-scoring items, where the improvement suggestion may include: college improvement points, student improvement points, enterprise improvement points. Aiming at the low-score projects of any dimension, improvement suggestions comprising three-party improvement points can be generated, comprehensive improvement can be performed from colleges and universities, students and enterprises through the scheme recorded in the embodiment, and the improvement of the education quality of the colleges and universities is promoted together.
In one embodiment, when the class design engagement dimension scores too low in the feedback model, other dimensions related to the dimension may be obtained, such as administrative dimensions pertaining to the college aspect, learning experience dimensions pertaining to the student aspect. The method can give out related warnings to enterprises, inform the enterprises that the curriculum design participation dimensionality is too low and needs to actively participate in curriculum design, give out related warnings for colleges and universities, inform the colleges and universities that administrative policies should be corrected, strengthen the contact with cooperative enterprises, jointly make curriculum participation, give out related warnings for students, inform the colleges and universities that the students should follow the rules of the schools, improve the feedback of curriculum contents of the enterprises, and urge the enterprises to actively participate in curriculum design.
In one embodiment, the content in the first assessment questionnaire includes, but is not limited to: whether policies are synchronized, whether a school party can guide the training and practice of teachers and whether the school party properly manages the education environment or not are achieved before different education institutions. The first assessment questionnaire was scored using a litterb table.
In one embodiment, the content in the second assessment questionnaire includes, but is not limited to: whether the teaching environment and/or equipment is good, whether the current behavior ability meets employment standards, whether the current teaching environment can encourage the achievement of students, whether the current teaching environment allows students to participate in the formulation of teaching guidelines, whether the current teaching environment changes the teaching mode of education workers according to the feedback of the students, whether the current teaching environment is equipped with teachers with good quality, whether the current teaching environment customizes education methods for students, whether the current teaching environment can enhance extraclass activity learning, whether the current teaching environment can promote the investing and enthusiasm of learning, whether the current cognitive ability meets employment standards, whether the current emotional ability meets employment standards, whether the current employment ability meets employment standards, and the like. The second assessment questionnaire was scored using a litterb table.
In one embodiment, the content in the third evaluation questionnaire includes, but is not limited to: whether an enterprise participates in course standard making, whether the enterprise provides teaching equipment for colleges and universities, whether the enterprise regularly collects student feedback information in a training period, whether the enterprise participates in examination test mode making, whether the enterprise participation mode is qualified, whether the enterprise participation quality reaches the standard, whether the enterprise collects learning information for courses, whether the enterprise improves learning time lines for the courses, whether the enterprise provides sharing teachers, whether the enterprise formulates practice tests and the like. The third evaluation questionnaire was scored using a litterb table.
In an embodiment, the third evaluation result of the previous year may be subjected to estimation scoring through a pre-trained estimation scoring model, the estimation scoring model may be obtained by performing supervised training according to the course information and the training environment information corresponding to the specialty, and the estimation scoring model is used for performing estimation scoring on the third evaluation result of two or more consecutive years.
If the difference between the current third evaluation result and the estimated score is greater than the preset reasonable difference, it indicates that the current third evaluation result score is too high or too low compared with the third evaluation result of the previous year, which indicates that the production and operation of the enterprise may be greatly changed, wherein the reasonable difference can be set according to the actual situation, and the specific value is not limited herein.
Further, related information of the enterprise is obtained, and the related information of the enterprise includes but is not limited to: and the change information of the enterprise responsible person and the enterprise operation condition information. The method comprises the steps of analyzing relevant information of an enterprise through a pre-trained neural network model, and obtaining an analysis result, wherein the pre-trained neural network model is used for carrying out convolution or other types of operation on the relevant information of the enterprise so as to display the change condition of various aspects in the enterprise, and the neural network model can be trained based on any one existing neural network model, and is not limited too much.
If the analysis result shows that the annual variation value of the enterprise is greater than the preset reasonable variation value, it indicates that the management layer or the production layer of the enterprise has relatively large variation in the last year, wherein the preset reasonable variation value can be set according to the actual situation, and the specific numerical value is not limited too much here. And a prompt is issued for the due graduation corresponding to the specialty, wherein the prompt is used for indicating that the employment risk is larger than that of the enterprise in the last year if the due graduation corresponding to the specialty is to select the enterprise for employment.
In one embodiment, as shown in fig. 2, the present application also provides an education quality assessment apparatus for colleges and universities, including: at least one processor; and a memory communicatively coupled to the at least one processor; wherein the memory stores instructions executable by the at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to perform the method according to any one of the embodiments described above.
In one embodiment, the present application further provides a non-transitory computer storage medium storing computer-executable instructions configured to: a method as in any preceding embodiment.
The above description is only an example of the present application and is not intended to limit the present application. Various modifications and changes may occur to those skilled in the art. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made within the spirit and principle of the present application should be included in the scope of the claims of the present application.
Claims (10)
1. A college education quality evaluation method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
determining the professions opened by colleges and universities, students corresponding to the professions and cooperative enterprises corresponding to the professions;
acquiring education policies and administrative management policies corresponding to the major, and making a first evaluation questionnaire based on the education policies and the administrative management policies so as to determine the quality of an education system of colleges and universities according to a first evaluation result corresponding to the colleges and universities;
acquiring teaching environment information and employment direction information corresponding to the major, and formulating a second evaluation questionnaire based on the teaching environment information and the employment direction information so as to determine the teaching quality of colleges and universities according to a second evaluation result corresponding to the student;
acquiring course information and training environment information corresponding to the major, and formulating a third evaluation questionnaire based on the course information and the training environment information so as to determine the docking degree of the colleges and universities and the cooperative enterprises according to a third evaluation result corresponding to the enterprises;
and carrying out comprehensive scoring according to the first evaluation result, the second evaluation result, the third evaluation result and a preset scoring rule to obtain education quality scores of colleges and universities.
2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the step of performing a comprehensive scoring according to the first, second and third evaluation results and a preset scoring rule further comprises:
determining a plurality of evaluation scores corresponding to each of the first evaluation questionnaire, the second evaluation questionnaire and the third evaluation questionnaire;
eliminating the highest score and the lowest score in the multiple evaluation scores to obtain an average corresponding to the remaining evaluation scores; and are
Determining a difference between a median of the plurality of evaluation scores and the mean;
and if the difference is greater than a preset threshold corresponding to the evaluation questionnaire, taking the average as an evaluation result corresponding to the evaluation questionnaire, and if the difference is less than the preset threshold, taking the median as an evaluation result corresponding to the evaluation questionnaire.
3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the preset threshold corresponding to the first questionnaire for assessment is not less than the preset threshold corresponding to the third questionnaire, and the preset threshold corresponding to the third questionnaire is greater than the preset threshold corresponding to the second questionnaire.
4. The method of claim 2, wherein after determining the plurality of evaluation scores corresponding to each of the first evaluation questionnaire, the second evaluation questionnaire, and the third evaluation questionnaire, the method further comprises:
determining a number of the second assessment questionnaire;
if the number of the second evaluation questionnaires is smaller than a first preset number, acquiring a plurality of second reference evaluation questionnaires, and supplementing the second reference evaluation questionnaires to the second evaluation questionnaires, wherein the second reference evaluation questionnaires are filled in by graduation students corresponding to the major;
acquiring the number of the third assessment questionnaires;
and if the number of the third evaluation questionnaires is less than a second preset number, acquiring a plurality of third reference evaluation questionnaires, and supplementing the third reference evaluation questionnaires to the third evaluation questionnaires, wherein the third reference evaluation questionnaires are filled by a third party authority.
5. The method for assessing education quality in colleges and universities according to claim 1, wherein the step of performing comprehensive scoring according to the first assessment result, the second assessment result, the third assessment result and preset scoring rules to obtain education quality scores in colleges and universities specifically comprises:
determining a weight scheme corresponding to the specialty from a plurality of preset weight schemes, wherein the weight scheme comprises weights corresponding to the first evaluation result, the second evaluation result and the third evaluation result respectively;
and obtaining a comprehensive score according to the weight scheme, the first evaluation result, the second evaluation result and the third evaluation result, and taking the comprehensive score as a college education quality score.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein after the composite score is used as the education quality score of colleges and universities, the method further comprises:
if the education quality score of the colleges and universities is larger than the estimation score, reducing the weight corresponding to the first evaluation result and/or the weight corresponding to the third evaluation result, and improving the weight corresponding to the second evaluation result to obtain a corrected weight scheme;
summing the first evaluation result, the second evaluation result and the third evaluation result according to the modified weight scheme to obtain a modified comprehensive score;
taking the corrected comprehensive score as a reference score of the education quality score of colleges and universities;
and if the reference score of the education quality score of the colleges and universities is smaller than the estimated score, replacing the weight scheme corresponding to the profession with the modified weight scheme.
7. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the comprehensive scoring is performed according to the first, second and third evaluation results and a preset scoring rule, and after the college education quality score is obtained, the method further comprises:
generating a college education quality feedback model according to the college education quality scores, wherein the feedback model comprises three aspects of colleges, students and enterprises, and the college aspect at least comprises: policy enforcement dimension, administrative dimension, the student aspect includes at least: learning experience dimension, employment dimension, the business aspect including at least: a course design participation dimension, a course execution participation dimension and a course feedback participation dimension;
acquiring a plurality of low-score items in each dimension, and generating an improvement suggestion aiming at any one of the plurality of low-score items, wherein the improvement suggestion comprises the following steps: at least one of college improvement points, student improvement points and enterprise improvement points.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the method further comprises:
obtaining an estimated third evaluation result according to a third evaluation result of the previous year and a pre-trained estimated evaluation model, wherein the estimated evaluation model is obtained by performing supervision training according to corresponding course information and training environment information;
if the difference between the third evaluation result and the estimated third evaluation result is greater than a preset reasonable difference, acquiring the related information of the enterprise, wherein the related information at least comprises: change information of enterprise responsible persons and enterprise operation condition information;
analyzing the relevant information through a pre-trained neural network model to obtain an analysis result;
if the analysis result shows that the annual variation value of the enterprise is larger than a preset reasonable variation value, a prompt is sent to the due graduates corresponding to the profession, and the prompt shows that the due graduates have higher risk compared with the previous year if the enterprise is in employment.
9. An education quality evaluation apparatus of colleges and universities, comprising:
at least one processor; and the number of the first and second groups,
a memory communicatively coupled to the at least one processor; wherein the content of the first and second substances,
the memory stores instructions executable by the at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to perform the method of any one of claims 1-8.
10. A non-transitory computer storage medium storing computer-executable instructions for education quality assessment in colleges and universities, the computer-executable instructions configured to: the method of any one of claims 1-8.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110189346.0A CN112862642A (en) | 2021-02-19 | 2021-02-19 | College education quality evaluation method, device and medium |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110189346.0A CN112862642A (en) | 2021-02-19 | 2021-02-19 | College education quality evaluation method, device and medium |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN112862642A true CN112862642A (en) | 2021-05-28 |
Family
ID=75988189
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110189346.0A Pending CN112862642A (en) | 2021-02-19 | 2021-02-19 | College education quality evaluation method, device and medium |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN112862642A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113837649A (en) * | 2021-10-11 | 2021-12-24 | 讯飞智元信息科技有限公司 | Enterprise diversified decision evaluation method, enterprise decision recommendation method and device |
-
2021
- 2021-02-19 CN CN202110189346.0A patent/CN112862642A/en active Pending
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113837649A (en) * | 2021-10-11 | 2021-12-24 | 讯飞智元信息科技有限公司 | Enterprise diversified decision evaluation method, enterprise decision recommendation method and device |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Jimerson et al. | Understanding the importance of teachers in facilitating student success: Contemporary science, practice, and policy. | |
| Van de Grift et al. | Teaching skills of student teachers: Calibration of an evaluation instrument and its value in predicting student academic engagement | |
| Saville et al. | The relation between GPA and exam performance during interteaching and lecture. | |
| Haptonstall | An analysis of the correlation between standards-based, non-standards-based grading systems and achievement as measured by the Colorado Student Assessment Program (CSAP) | |
| CN112862642A (en) | College education quality evaluation method, device and medium | |
| Choudhury et al. | The impact of social and demographic variables on ethical decision-making: Exploratory study | |
| Coulter et al. | Ending the big squeeze on skills: how to futureproof education in England | |
| Dragoset et al. | Measuring School Performance for Early Elementary Grades in Maryland. | |
| Loyalka et al. | Unpacking teacher professional development | |
| Escarlos et al. | Motives, attitudes and performance of teacher education students | |
| Duong et al. | Exploiting faculty evaluation forms to improve teaching quality: An analytical review | |
| Addonizio et al. | Teacher quality and sorting across traditional public and charter schools in the Detroit Metropolitan Region | |
| Buckley et al. | Innovative approaches and measurement considerations for the selection of the school quality and student success indicator under ESSA | |
| Fedorenko et al. | The algorithm for applying the rating system of evaluation as an effective method of influencing the activation of cognitive activity of students | |
| Hoachlander | Accountability for Vocational Education: A Practitioner's Guide. | |
| Barton | An investigation of the relationship between school size, socio-economic status, expenditure-per-student, mobility rate, and percentage of non-white secondary students taking state science exams | |
| Edmonds | Missouri General Education Assessment: Examination of teacher candidate scores and predictor variables | |
| Thomas et al. | Alignment of Literacy and Numeracy Measures Research for the Tertiary Education Commission | |
| Cullinane et al. | Life Lessons | |
| Sporte et al. | Teacher Evaluation in Practice: Exploring Relationships between School Characteristics & Evaluation Scores. | |
| Lennon | In search of quality: Evaluating the impact of learning outcomes policies in higher education regulation | |
| CN109242305A (en) | Instructional Design quality evaluating method based on learning behavior | |
| Docheva et al. | Model for quality evaluation in secondary education | |
| McQueen | Examining the Continued Impact of the Pandemic on Student Achievement in GVSU Charter Schools-Year 2 Report | |
| Ozmusul et al. | School Policies and Practices at Upper Secondary Schools in Turkey According to PISA 2009 Data. |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20210528 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |