CN109242305A - Instructional Design quality evaluating method based on learning behavior - Google Patents
Instructional Design quality evaluating method based on learning behavior Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN109242305A CN109242305A CN201811026491.1A CN201811026491A CN109242305A CN 109242305 A CN109242305 A CN 109242305A CN 201811026491 A CN201811026491 A CN 201811026491A CN 109242305 A CN109242305 A CN 109242305A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- trifle
- learning
- course
- unit
- electrocardiogram
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 44
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 39
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 21
- 230000000638 stimulation Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 83
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 27
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 68
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000013441 quality evaluation Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 4
- SBNFWQZLDJGRLK-UHFFFAOYSA-N phenothrin Chemical compound CC1(C)C(C=C(C)C)C1C(=O)OCC1=CC=CC(OC=2C=CC=CC=2)=C1 SBNFWQZLDJGRLK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000011158 quantitative evaluation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06395—Quality analysis or management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/20—Education
- G06Q50/205—Education administration or guidance
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Educational Technology (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Electrically Operated Instructional Devices (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a kind of Instructional Design quality evaluating method based on learning behavior comprising following steps: S1 obtains the content frame of course from server；S2 obtains study stimulation degree-learning behavior classification chart from server, extracts the study stimulation degree information of each learning behavior；S3 is drawn the course electrocardiogram of the trifle electrocardiogram of each trifle, the unit electrocardiogram of each unit and course respectively by graphical tools, and shown on visual graphical interfaces；S4 calculates trifle, the evaluation index of the Instructional Design quality of unit and course；S5 calculates the health degree value of course, and show on visual graphical interfaces, is evaluated according to health degree value and Instructional Design quality of the course electrocardiogram to course according to preset rules.The beneficial effects of the present invention are the objectivity, the accuracys that improve Instructional Design quality evaluation.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to the technical field of network electronic teaching, in particular to a kind of Instructional Design matter based on learning behavior
Measure evaluation method.
Background technique
Existing Instructional Design quality is that some evaluation indexes are manually arranged, then artificial qualitative evaluation, typical
Method is the five-pointed star course evaluation method of U.S. Instructional Design teacher M.David Merrill, the side of the Instructional Design quality evaluation
Method has the following deficiencies:
1, the basis of Instructional Design is " religion " rather than " ".From the point of view of the value delivered according to Instructional Design,
Evaluate Instructional Design quality should how be learnt, rather than how teach；
2, lack quantitative evaluation index.Current Instructional Design quality evaluation index is substantially qualitative evaluation, credible
Degree is not high, and the personal colors of evaluation are too heavy, leads to the same Instructional Design scheme, and different estimators evaluates widely different；
3, Instructional Design evaluation procedure is too long, and program is complicated, and Course Exercise is caused to lack evaluation feedback.Because being related to artificial
Qualitative evaluation, so the organizational process and process of evaluation are very long, current course evaluation is only limitted to a small number of courses, most of to impart knowledge to students
Design actually lacks evaluation and feedback.
Summary of the invention
In view of the problems of the existing technology, the main object of the present invention is to provide a kind of teaching based on learning behavior and sets
Quality evaluating method is counted, objectivity, the accuracy of Instructional Design quality evaluation are improved.
To achieve the above object, the Instructional Design quality evaluating method proposed by the present invention based on learning behavior comprising
Following steps:
S1, obtains the content frame of course from server, and the content frame is equipped with multiple units, packet in each unit
It include multiple learning activities in each trifle equipped with multiple trifles；Extract learning behavior information in each learning activities and when
Long message；
S2 obtains study stimulation degree-learning behavior classification chart from server, extracts the study stimulation of each learning behavior
Spend information；The study stimulation degree refers to the degree of the excited activation of learner's study comprising 1-10 stimulation degree；The study
Behavior include read, pay attention to the class viewing, speech is putd question to, big group discussion, panel discussion, self-test assessment, analysis of cases, role playing,
Practice practical operation and situation simulation, it is corresponding with 1-10 stimulation degree respectively；
S3, drawn respectively by graphical tools the trifle electrocardiogram of each trifle, the unit electrocardiogram of each unit, with
And the course electrocardiogram of course, and show on visual graphical interfaces；Wherein, the trifle electrocardiogram, unit electrocardiogram
Abscissa with course electrocardiogram is duration, and ordinate is study stimulation degree；
S4, calculates trifle, the evaluation index of the Instructional Design quality of unit and course, and the evaluation index includes actively
Study than, effective learning activities quantity, stimulation degree fluctuating range, learning activities duration rationality；The Active Learning ratio
Refer to the ratio of Active Learning time and total duration；Effective learning activities quantity refers to that including at least one be not empty learning stuff
Learning activities quantity；The stimulation degree fluctuating range refers to the sum of the stimulation degree difference between adjacent learning activities.
S5 calculates the health degree value of course, and show on visual graphical interfaces according to preset rules；
By in health degree value combination step S3 trifle electrocardiogram, unit electrocardiogram, course electrocardiogram is to the Instructional Design quality of course
It is evaluated.
Preferably, in the step S3, by the Active Learning of trifle, unit and course than showing trifle electrocardio respectively
On figure, unit electrocardiogram and course electrocardiogram.
Specifically, the Active Learning ratio includes that trifle Active Learning ratio, unit Active Learning ratio and course are actively learned
Ratio is practised, when the trifle Active Learning is more total with the trifle than the time duration for the learning activities of study stimulation degree >=3 in trifle
Long ratio, the unit Active Learning is than the average value of the trifle Active Learning ratio for trifle each in unit, and the course is actively
Study is than the average value for the unit Active Learning ratio of each unit in course.
Specifically, the stimulation degree fluctuating range include: trifle stimulation degree fluctuating range, unit stimulation degree fluctuating range with
And course stimulation degree fluctuating range, the calculation formula of the trifle stimulation degree fluctuating range are as follows: R=| C1-C2|+|C2-C3|
+……+|Cn-1-Cn|, wherein CaIndicate that the study stimulation degree of a-th of learning activities in trifle, the unit stimulation degree fluctuate width
Degree is the average value of the trifle stimulation degree fluctuating range of each trifle in unit, and the course stimulation degree fluctuating range is each in course
The average value of the unit stimulation degree fluctuating range of unit.
Preferably, the unit electrocardiogram is spliced by the trifle electrocardiogram of each trifle in the unit.
Preferably, the course electrocardiogram is spliced by the unit electrocardiogram of each unit in the course.
Technical solution of the present invention is by classifying to learning behavior according to study stimulation degree, thus according to learning behavior
It is corresponding study stimulation degree and learning activities duration come come generate to from trifle, to unit again to the electrocardiogram of course, thus
Instructor is allowed to judge the reasonability of Instructional Design according to the electrocardiogram.Meanwhile in conjunction with based on study stimulation degree and
The relevant evaluation index that movable duration generates is practised integrally to carry out quantitative evaluation to course, avoids commenting caused by personal evaluation
Having differences property of valence, so that the evaluation of Instructional Design quality has more according to property and confidence level.
Detailed description of the invention
In order to more clearly explain the embodiment of the invention or the technical proposal in the existing technology, to embodiment or will show below
There is attached drawing needed in technical description to be briefly described, it should be apparent that, the accompanying drawings in the following description is only this
Some embodiments of invention for those of ordinary skill in the art without creative efforts, can be with
The structure shown according to these attached drawings obtains other attached drawings.
Fig. 1 is flow diagram of the invention；
Fig. 2 is the schematic diagram of trifle electrocardiogram；
Fig. 3 is the schematic diagram of course electrocardiogram；
Fig. 4 is the function schematic diagram of learning activities (reading) duration rationality；
The object of the invention is realized, the embodiments will be further described with reference to the accompanying drawings for functional characteristics and advantage.
Specific embodiment
The present invention proposes a kind of Instructional Design quality evaluating method based on learning behavior.
Referring to Fig.1, Fig. 1 is flow diagram of the invention.
As shown in Figure 1, in embodiments of the present invention, which includes the following steps:
S1, obtains the content frame of course from server, and the content frame is equipped with multiple units, packet in each unit
It include multiple learning activities in each trifle equipped with multiple trifles；Extract learning behavior information in each learning activities and when
Long message.
In step sl, user can modify to course content frame is obtained, and such as increase of customized course is deleted
Unit, trifle and the learning activities of course are removed or modify, learning behavior and the duration information of learning activities can also carry out
Secondary modification.
S2 obtains study stimulation degree-learning behavior classification chart from server, and the classification chart is as shown in table 1, extracts each
The study stimulation degree information of learning behavior.
| Learn stimulation degree | Learning behavior |
| 10 | Situation simulation |
| 9 | Practice practical operation |
| 8 | Role playing |
| 7 | Analysis of cases |
| 6 | Self-test assessment |
| 5 | Panel discussion |
| 4 | Big group discusses |
| 3 | Speech is putd question to |
| 2 | Pay attention to the class viewing |
| 1 | It reads |
Table 1
Wherein, study stimulation degree is the degree of the excited activation of learner's study, and numerical value is higher, indicates to learner's
Excitement activation is higher.Meanwhile in the present embodiment, the learning behavior that stimulation degree is 3 or more will be learnt and is labeled as Active Learning
Behavior will learn the learning behavior that stimulation degree is 1 or 2 and be labeled as student's passive learning behavior.
S3, drawn respectively by graphical tools the trifle electrocardiogram of each trifle, the unit electrocardiogram of each unit, with
And the course electrocardiogram of course, and show on visual graphical interfaces；As shown in Fig. 2, Fig. 2 is trifle electrocardiogram, it is
One two-dimensional data drawing list, abscissa are the time, and ordinate is study stimulation degree, each learning activities of trifle is in electrocardiogram
In be shown as one comprising Active duration and it is movable study stimulation degree value histogram.Unit electrocardiogram and course electrocardiogram
Display form it is similar with trifle electrocardiogram, do not repeat herein again.
In the present embodiment, which is data drawing list software for drawing (such as EXCEL), and user can pass through program tune
With data drawing list software for drawing come electrocardiogram.Should illustrate when, electrocardiogram is drawn by graphical tools also can be used and is existing
Some modes is realized.
In step s3, by the duration and study stimulation degree according to learning activities come in-time generatin trifle electrocardiogram, list
First electrocardiogram and course electrocardiogram, with the learning activities intuitively according to the fluctuating range of electrocardiogram to trifle, unit or course
The reasonability of design is judged that the fluctuating range of electrocardiogram is bigger for the first time, indicates that learning activities design is better.
In step s3, by the Active Learning of trifle, unit and course than showing trifle electrocardiogram, unit electrocardiogram respectively
On course electrocardiogram, in order to directly observe the Active Learning ratio of trifle, unit and course.
In the present embodiment, to improve drawing efficiency, unit electrocardiogram is spelled by the trifle electrocardiogram of each trifle in the unit
It connects, course electrocardiogram is spliced by the unit electrocardiogram of each unit in the course.As shown in figure 3, Fig. 3 is course electrocardio
Figure, is spliced by the unit electrocardiogram of each unit in course.
S4, calculates trifle, the evaluation index of the Instructional Design quality of unit and course, and the evaluation index includes actively
Study than, effective learning activities quantity, stimulation degree fluctuating range, learning activities duration rationality.It should be noted that
In the step, all calculating process are realized by computer-internal program.
Active Learning than be mainly used for evaluate Instructional Design in learner be actively engaged in study time it is whether reasonable.The master
Ratio of the dynamic study than referring to Active Learning time and total duration comprising trifle Active Learning ratio, unit Active Learning ratio and
Course Active Learning ratio, trifle Active Learning are smaller with this than the time duration for the learning activities of study stimulation degree >=3 in trifle
Save total duration ratio, average value of the unit Active Learning than the trifle Active Learning ratio for trifle each in unit, course actively
Practise the average value than being the unit Active Learning ratio of each unit in course.
Effective learning activities quantity refers to that including at least one be not the quantity of the learning activities of empty learning stuff, is mainly used for
The structural whether reasonable of Instructional Design evaluated.By calculating effective learning activities quantity, avoid living in design learning in user
Forget or omit to add learning stuff in learning activities in dynamic, to influence commenting for the Instructional Design quality of course entirety
Valence.Wherein, learning stuff refers to knowledge picture and text, information form, case, structure chart, video, exercise and question-and-answer problem etc.
Stimulation degree fluctuating range refers to the sum of the stimulation degree difference between adjacent learning activities, and fluctuating range is bigger, then illustrates
It is more reasonable to learn movable design in course.The stimulation degree fluctuating range includes trifle stimulation degree fluctuating range, unit stimulation
Spend fluctuating range and course stimulation degree fluctuating range.The calculation formula of trifle stimulation degree fluctuating range are as follows: R=| C1-C2|+|
C2-C3|+……+|Cn-1-Cn|, wherein CaIndicate the study stimulation degree of a-th of learning activities in trifle.The fluctuation of unit stimulation degree
Amplitude is the average value of the trifle stimulation degree fluctuating range of each trifle in unit, and course stimulation degree fluctuating range is each list in course
The average value of the unit stimulation degree fluctuating range of member.Stimulation degree fluctuating range is mainly to illustrate the fluctuation of electrocardiogram by data
Amplitude allows user more accurately to judge whether the adjacent learning activities design of course is reasonable, when fluctuating range is smaller
When, show that the identical probability of study stimulation degree between adjacent learning activities is bigger, i.e., expression learner lives in two study
The dynamic state for requiring to keep high participation or passively impart knowledge to students, is unfavorable for the study of learner, as a result, by analysis trifle,
The stimulation degree fluctuating range of unit or course can rapidly find out and design unreasonable trifle, for improving.
Learning activities duration rationality is mainly used for judging whether learning activities duration is reasonable, in this implementation
In example, the calculating process of learning activities duration rationality is as follows:
S41 obtains the maximum study duration data of various learning behaviors, as shown in table 2；
| Learn stimulation degree | Learning behavior | Maximum time/min |
| 10 | Situation simulation | 50 |
| 9 | Practice practical operation | 45 |
| 8 | Role playing | 40 |
| 7 | Analysis of cases | 35 |
| 6 | Self-test assessment | 30 |
| 5 | Panel discussion | 25 |
| 4 | Big group discusses | 20 |
| 3 | Speech is putd question to | 15 |
| 2 | Pay attention to the class viewing | 10 |
| 1 | It reads | 5 |
Table 2
S42, to learn duration t as abscissa, with learning activities duration rationality f (t) for ordinate, setting is when
When practising movable a length of learning activities maximum time 60% when, learning activities duration rationality obtain maximum value A；When
Learning activities when a length of Active duration maximum value when, learning activities duration rationality is 0；Again with maximum value A point
The point at place is vertex, and the longitudinal axis where maximum value A point is symmetry axis, and point when learning where a length of maximum value is right side zero
Point makees the parabola that Open Side Down, calculates the parabolical function, using the function as learning activities duration rationality meter
Calculate formula.For example, the maximum time of the corresponding learning activities is 5min, then when the behavior property of learning activities is to read
With point (3, A) for vertex, using straight line t=3 as symmetry axis, with point (5,0) for right side zero point, a parabola is done, as shown in Figure 4；
Then the parabolical function f (t) is solved, it is reasonable to solve the learning activities duration under different Active durations according to f (t)
Degree.
In the present embodiment, the learning activities duration rationality of trifle is that the study of each learning activities in the trifle is living
The average value of dynamic duration rationality, the learning activities duration rationality of unit are that the study of each trifle in the unit is living
The average value of dynamic duration rationality, the learning activities duration rationality of course are that the study of each unit in the course is living
The average value of dynamic duration rationality.
S5 calculates the health degree value of course, and show on visual graphical interfaces according to preset rules,
As shown in Figure 3；Religion by the trifle electrocardiogram, unit electrocardiogram, course electrocardiogram in health degree value combination step S3 to course
Designing quality is learned to be evaluated.It should be noted that in this step, all calculating process pass through computer-internal program
To realize.
In the present embodiment, health degree value is by Active Learning ratio, effective learning activities quantity, stimulation degree fluctuating range,
This four evaluation indexes of habit activity duration rationality are constituted.
Preset rule are as follows:
A, the learning activities time span accounting of 3 or more stimulation degree should be more than or equal to 70%, account for health degree value
Weight is 30%；
B, effective learning activities quantity of trifle is 4 or more, and the weight for accounting for health degree value is 20%；
C, trifle activity stimulation degree fluctuating range should be 8 or 8 or more, and the weight for accounting for health degree value is 30%；
D, the learning activities duration of single stimulation degree must not exceed the maximum time of the learning activities, account for health degree value
Weight is 20%；Wherein, the identical successive learning activity of stimulation degree is considered as a learning activities.
To indicate health degree value in the present embodiment convenient for the calculation formula for expressing health degree value with J, indicated actively with P
Learning ratio with the effective learning activities quantity of M indicates stimulation degree fluctuating range with R, with Q learning activities duration rationality,
Health degree value takes hundred-mark system.The calculation formula of health degree value is as follows:
It should illustrate yes, when P is greater than 0.7, Active Learning ratio is remembered according to default rule according to Active Learning ratio
Full marks 30 are scored to divide；Similarly, when effective learning activities quantity is greater than 4, remember that effective learning activities quantity is scored at
Full marks 20 divide；When stimulation degree fluctuating range is greater than 8, note stimulation degree fluctuating range is scored at full marks 30 and divides.Above-mentioned calculating is public
Formula is the calculation formula of the health degree value of trifle, and the health degree value of unit is that the health degree value of each trifle is averaged in the unit
Value, the health degree value of course is the average value of the health degree value of each unit in the course.
Technical solution of the present invention is by classifying to learning behavior according to study stimulation degree, thus according to learning behavior
It is corresponding study stimulation degree and learning activities duration come come generate to from trifle, to unit again to the electrocardiogram of course, thus
Instructor is allowed to judge the reasonability of Instructional Design according to the electrocardiogram.Meanwhile in conjunction with based on study stimulation degree and
The relevant evaluation index that movable duration generates is practised integrally to carry out quantitative evaluation to course, avoids commenting caused by personal evaluation
Having differences property of valence, so that the evaluation of Instructional Design quality has more according to property and confidence level.
The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, is not intended to limit the scope of the invention, all at this
Under the inventive concept of invention, using equivalent transformation made by description of the invention and accompanying drawing content, or directly/it is used in it indirectly
He is included in scope of patent protection of the invention relevant technical field.
Claims (6)
1. a kind of Instructional Design quality evaluating method based on learning behavior, which comprises the steps of:
S1 obtains the content frame of course from server, and the content frame is equipped with multiple units, and packet is equipped in each unit
Multiple trifles, interior each trifle includes multiple learning activities；Extract learning behavior information in each learning activities with when long letter
Breath；
S2 obtains study stimulation degree-learning behavior classification chart from server, extracts the study stimulation degree letter of each learning behavior
Breath；The study stimulation degree refers to the degree of the excited activation of learner's study comprising 1-10 stimulation degree；The learning behavior
Including reading, paying attention to the class viewing, speech is putd question to, big group discussion, panel discussion, self-test assessment, analysis of cases, role playing, practice
Practical operation and situation simulation, it is corresponding with 1-10 stimulation degree respectively；
S3 draws the trifle electrocardiogram of each trifle, the unit electrocardiogram of each unit and class by graphical tools respectively
The course electrocardiogram of journey, and show on visual graphical interfaces；Wherein, the trifle electrocardiogram, unit electrocardiogram and class
The abscissa of journey electrocardiogram is duration, and ordinate is study stimulation degree；
S4 calculates trifle, the evaluation index of the Instructional Design quality of unit and course, and the evaluation index includes Active Learning
Than, effective learning activities quantity, stimulation degree fluctuating range, learning activities duration rationality；The Active Learning ratio refers to master
The ratio of dynamic learning time and total duration；Effective learning activities quantity refers to that including at least one be not empty learning stuff
Practise movable quantity；The stimulation degree fluctuating range refers to the sum of the stimulation degree difference between adjacent learning activities.
S5 calculates the health degree value of course, and show on visual graphical interfaces according to preset rules；It will be good for
Trifle electrocardiogram, unit electrocardiogram, course electrocardiogram in health angle value combination step S3 carry out the Instructional Design quality of course
Evaluation.
2. the Instructional Design quality evaluating method based on learning behavior as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that the step
In S3, by the Active Learning of trifle, unit and course than showing trifle electrocardiogram, unit electrocardiogram and course electrocardiogram respectively
On.
3. the Instructional Design quality evaluating method based on learning behavior as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that the active
Study is than including trifle Active Learning ratio, unit Active Learning ratio and course Active Learning ratio, the trifle Active Learning ratio
For the time duration and the trifle total duration ratio of the learning activities of study stimulation degree >=3 in trifle, the unit Active Learning
Than the average value of the trifle Active Learning ratio for trifle each in unit, the course Active Learning is than the list for each unit in course
The average value of first Active Learning ratio.
4. the Instructional Design quality evaluating method based on learning behavior as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that the stimulation
Spending fluctuating range includes: trifle stimulation degree fluctuating range, unit stimulation degree fluctuating range and course stimulation degree fluctuating range, institute
State the calculation formula of trifle stimulation degree fluctuating range are as follows: R=| C1-C2|+|C2-C3|+……+|Cn-1-Cn|, wherein CaIndicate small
The study stimulation degree of a-th of learning activities in section, the unit stimulation degree fluctuating range are the trifle stimulation of each trifle in unit
The average value of fluctuating range is spent, the course stimulation degree fluctuating range is the unit stimulation degree fluctuating range of each unit in course
Average value.
5. the Instructional Design quality evaluating method based on learning behavior as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that the unit
Electrocardiogram is spliced by the trifle electrocardiogram of each trifle in the unit.
6. the Instructional Design quality evaluating method based on learning behavior as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that the course
Electrocardiogram is spliced by the unit electrocardiogram of each unit in the course.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811026491.1A CN109242305B (en) | 2018-09-04 | 2018-09-04 | Teaching design quality evaluation method based on learning behaviors |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811026491.1A CN109242305B (en) | 2018-09-04 | 2018-09-04 | Teaching design quality evaluation method based on learning behaviors |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN109242305A true CN109242305A (en) | 2019-01-18 |
| CN109242305B CN109242305B (en) | 2022-03-22 |
Family
ID=65061021
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811026491.1A Expired - Fee Related CN109242305B (en) | 2018-09-04 | 2018-09-04 | Teaching design quality evaluation method based on learning behaviors |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN109242305B (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111145058A (en) * | 2019-12-27 | 2020-05-12 | 吉林省点创科技有限公司 | Teaching behavior analysis system and method based on artificial intelligence |
Citations (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20130004930A1 (en) * | 2011-07-01 | 2013-01-03 | Peter Floyd Sorenson | Learner Interaction Monitoring System |
| CN202871108U (en) * | 2012-04-12 | 2013-04-10 | 周维 | Network education player |
| CN105844562A (en) * | 2016-05-23 | 2016-08-10 | 华中师范大学 | Learner learning performance analysis method based on curriculum teaching model |
| CN105869088A (en) * | 2016-04-18 | 2016-08-17 | 李隆帜 | Teaching quality evaluation system based on online education |
| CN107256522A (en) * | 2017-04-13 | 2017-10-17 | 杭州博世数据网络有限公司 | Teaching assessment system based on cloud teaching platform |
| CN108154304A (en) * | 2017-12-26 | 2018-06-12 | 重庆大争科技有限公司 | There is the server of Teaching Quality Assessment |
| CN108182541A (en) * | 2018-01-10 | 2018-06-19 | 张木华 | A kind of blended learning recruitment evaluation and interference method and device |
| CN108288129A (en) * | 2018-03-01 | 2018-07-17 | 丁勇和 | A kind of student's practice management |
| CN108460139A (en) * | 2018-03-09 | 2018-08-28 | 上海开放大学 | Based on web crawlers data mining online course Management System for Evaluation Teaching Quality |
-
2018
- 2018-09-04 CN CN201811026491.1A patent/CN109242305B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20130004930A1 (en) * | 2011-07-01 | 2013-01-03 | Peter Floyd Sorenson | Learner Interaction Monitoring System |
| CN202871108U (en) * | 2012-04-12 | 2013-04-10 | 周维 | Network education player |
| CN105869088A (en) * | 2016-04-18 | 2016-08-17 | 李隆帜 | Teaching quality evaluation system based on online education |
| CN105844562A (en) * | 2016-05-23 | 2016-08-10 | 华中师范大学 | Learner learning performance analysis method based on curriculum teaching model |
| CN107256522A (en) * | 2017-04-13 | 2017-10-17 | 杭州博世数据网络有限公司 | Teaching assessment system based on cloud teaching platform |
| CN108154304A (en) * | 2017-12-26 | 2018-06-12 | 重庆大争科技有限公司 | There is the server of Teaching Quality Assessment |
| CN108182541A (en) * | 2018-01-10 | 2018-06-19 | 张木华 | A kind of blended learning recruitment evaluation and interference method and device |
| CN108288129A (en) * | 2018-03-01 | 2018-07-17 | 丁勇和 | A kind of student's practice management |
| CN108460139A (en) * | 2018-03-09 | 2018-08-28 | 上海开放大学 | Based on web crawlers data mining online course Management System for Evaluation Teaching Quality |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
| Title |
|---|
| 成亚玲等: "在线开放课程学习质量评价指标体系构建与应用", 《当代职业教育》 * |
| 赵呈领等: "学习体验视角下在线开放课程质量评价模型研究――以教师研修类课程为例", 《现代远距离教育》 * |
| 龙晓莉等: "智能学习系统的研究", 《华南理工大学学报(自然科学版)》 * |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111145058A (en) * | 2019-12-27 | 2020-05-12 | 吉林省点创科技有限公司 | Teaching behavior analysis system and method based on artificial intelligence |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN109242305B (en) | 2022-03-22 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Gumus et al. | The relationship between principal leadership and teacher collaboration in Turkish primary schools: A multilevel analysis | |
| Sass et al. | Value added of teachers in high-poverty schools and lower poverty schools | |
| Murray | The impact of formative and summative evaluation of teaching in North American universities | |
| Burger | Designing a sustainable standards-based assessment system | |
| McGrane et al. | Applying a thurstonian, two-stage method in the standardized assessment of writing | |
| Glazerman et al. | False Performance Gains: A Critique of Successive Cohort Indicators. Working Paper. | |
| Porter et al. | Framework for an Effective Assessment and Accountability Program: The Philadelphia Example1 | |
| Markowitz et al. | Linking professional development to classroom quality: Differences by ECE sector | |
| Railsback et al. | The Value of Business Education: Perceptions of High School Guidance Counselors, Principals, and Boards of Education. | |
| CN109242305A (en) | Instructional Design quality evaluating method based on learning behavior | |
| Bisalski et al. | Preparing undergraduate students for the Major Field Test in Business | |
| HERIZAL | The Relationship among learning styles, classroom environment, and academic achievement of English education study program students in state Islamic university of Raden Fatah Palembang | |
| Laabidi | The Impact of Teaching Experience on Professors’ Use of ICTs in the Teaching Process | |
| Bemile et al. | Course and lecturer evaluation by students at higher institutions: Review and challenges (The case of Methodist University College Ghana) | |
| KR20010104022A (en) | Method For Management An Item Pool Classified By A Grade | |
| Caskey | The Value of Action Research in Middle Grades Education. | |
| Olkaba et al. | Practices and challenges of continuous assessment in colleges of teachers’ education in the west Oromia region, Ethiopia | |
| Kazley et al. | Student Competency Self-Assessment Measurement: Frame of Reference is Everything | |
| Wyse et al. | A graphical transition table for communicating status and growth | |
| Borg | Beyond a dual understanding of gender differences in school achievement: A study of the gender gap among youth in Oslo secondary schools | |
| Erwin | Assessment and evaluation: A systems approach for their utilization | |
| Tolentino | Readiness of Public Elementary Schools in Polomolok District Towards School-Based Management (SBM) Implementation: An Assessment | |
| Hutchinson | School Principal Perceptions of Teacher Underperformance | |
| Sommers | Effect of class size on student achievement and teacher behavior in third-grade | |
| Metz | Teacher and school administrator: Supply and demand |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20220322 |
|
| CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |