CN112488466A - High arch dam safety collaborative evaluation method and device - Google Patents
High arch dam safety collaborative evaluation method and device Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN112488466A CN112488466A CN202011274802.3A CN202011274802A CN112488466A CN 112488466 A CN112488466 A CN 112488466A CN 202011274802 A CN202011274802 A CN 202011274802A CN 112488466 A CN112488466 A CN 112488466A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- evaluation value
- index
- weight coefficient
- high arch
- arch dam
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 498
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 40
- 238000013179 statistical model Methods 0.000 claims description 61
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 32
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims description 22
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 claims description 18
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 claims description 18
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 claims description 18
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 claims description 18
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 239000010410 layer Substances 0.000 claims description 11
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000011229 interlayer Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000005192 partition Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 13
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 210000000476 body water Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012797 qualification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001174 ascending effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0635—Risk analysis of enterprise or organisation activities
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/08—Construction
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The application provides a method and a device for high arch dam safety collaborative evaluation. The high arch dam safety collaborative evaluation method comprises the following steps: acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value of uniformity indexes of the high arch dam and a corresponding first weight coefficient; acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value of the balance index of the high arch dam and a corresponding second weight coefficient; acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value of the harmony index of the high arch dam and a corresponding third weight coefficient; acquiring an overall index comprehensive evaluation value of the high arch dam and a corresponding fourth weight coefficient; calculating a final safety comprehensive evaluation value according to the uniformity index comprehensive evaluation value and a corresponding first weight coefficient, the balance index comprehensive evaluation value and a corresponding second weight coefficient, the harmony index comprehensive evaluation value and a corresponding third weight coefficient, the integrity index comprehensive evaluation value and a corresponding fourth weight coefficient; according to the method, the accurate assessment of the safety state of the dam is effectively improved by adopting the high arch dam safety collaborative evaluation method.
Description
Technical Field
The application relates to the technical field of large-volume concrete structure engineering and construction, in particular to a method and a device for safety collaborative evaluation of a high arch dam.
Background
Engineering safety is always a key problem concerned by project management and constructors, so for dam engineering, a dam safety evaluation technology is a crucial step, and although a dam safety evaluation system makes great progress at present, some defects also exist, such as: the working state and the safety factor of a 300m high arch dam designed under a design specification system based on an arch beam load sharing method are not completely clarified. At present, whether a mode of carrying out safety assessment on the dam based on a large 'K' mode safety coefficient is suitable or not is generally adopted in the whole process of dam construction, water storage and operation, and whether the safety coefficient is real or not is completely clarified.
Disclosure of Invention
The embodiment of the application aims to provide a high arch dam safety collaborative evaluation method and device, and the safety collaborative evaluation of the whole process of high arch dam construction-water storage and operation is realized by building a novel index safety collaborative evaluation system of a dam, so that the accuracy of evaluating the safety state of the dam is improved.
In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a high arch dam safety collaborative evaluation method, including:
acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value of the uniformity index of the high arch dam and a corresponding first weight coefficient;
acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value of the balance index of the high arch dam and a corresponding second weight coefficient;
acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value of the harmony index of the high arch dam and a corresponding third weight coefficient;
acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value of the integrity index of the high arch dam and a corresponding fourth weight coefficient;
calculating a final safety comprehensive evaluation value according to the uniformity index comprehensive evaluation value and a corresponding first weight coefficient, the balance index comprehensive evaluation value and a corresponding second weight coefficient, the harmony index comprehensive evaluation value and a corresponding third weight coefficient, the integrity index comprehensive evaluation value and a corresponding fourth weight coefficient;
and judging whether the high arch dam is safe or not according to the final comprehensive safety evaluation value.
According to the embodiment of the application, a more comprehensive novel index evaluation system is provided, the novel index evaluation system covers the safety evaluation sub-index of the whole process of the high arch dam engineering construction period and the whole process of the operation period, and the accurate evaluation of the safety state of the dam is effectively improved.
Optionally, in the method for collaborative safety evaluation of a high arch dam according to the embodiment of the present application, the obtaining of a comprehensive evaluation value of a uniformity index of the high arch dam includes:
acquiring a concrete mixing quality index evaluation value A1 and a concrete vibrating quality index evaluation value A2 by adopting a statistical model of concrete mixing quality and vibrating quality uniformity;
acquiring an on-site core drilling sampling tensile strength index evaluation value A3, an on-site core drilling sampling ultimate tensile value index evaluation value A4 and an interlayer joint surface strength index evaluation value A5;
and calculating the comprehensive evaluation value of the uniformity index of the high arch dam according to the evaluation value A1 and the weight coefficient a1 of the concrete mixing quality index, the evaluation value A2 and the weight coefficient a2 of the concrete vibration quality index, the evaluation value A3 and the weight coefficient A3 of the on-site core drilling sampling tensile strength index, the evaluation value A4 and the weight coefficient a4 of the on-site core drilling sampling ultimate tensile value index, the evaluation value A5 of the interlayer junction surface strength index and the weight coefficient a5 of the on-site core drilling sampling ultimate tensile value index.
Optionally, in the method for collaborative safety evaluation of a high arch dam according to the embodiment of the present application, the obtaining of a comprehensive evaluation value of a balance index of the high arch dam includes:
identifying the proportion of the number of bins of which the adjacent height difference does not exceed the designed height difference to the total number of bins by using an adjacent height difference statistical model to obtain an evaluation value B1 of an adjacent height difference index;
identifying the proportion of the number of bins of the high arch dam which do not exceed the designed height difference standard to the total number of bins by adopting a maximum height difference statistical model to obtain an evaluation value B2 of the maximum height difference index;
identifying the proportion of the standard bin number of the cantilever height of the high arch dam which does not exceed the design to the total bin number by adopting a cantilever height statistical model to obtain an evaluation value B3 of the cantilever height index;
identifying the proportion of the overall overhang height allowed by the design of the high arch dam and the actual overhang height by adopting an overall overhang degree statistical model to obtain an evaluation value B4 of an overall overhang degree index;
and calculating a balance index comprehensive evaluation value of the high arch dam according to the adjacent height index evaluation value B1 and the weight coefficient B1, the maximum height index evaluation value B2 and the weight coefficient B2, the cantilever height index evaluation value B3 and the weight coefficient B3, and the evaluation value B4 and the weight coefficient B4 of the overall suspension index.
Optionally, in the method for collaborative safety evaluation of a high arch dam according to the embodiment of the present application, the obtaining a comprehensive evaluation value of a coordination index of the high arch dam includes obtaining an evaluation value C1 of a temperature control index;
the acquiring of the temperature control index evaluation value C1 includes:
identifying the proportion of the total number of the highest temperature not exceeding bins of each partition of the high arch dam to the actual total number of poured bins by adopting a highest temperature exceeding statistical model to obtain an evaluation value C11 of a highest temperature index;
identifying the ratio of the number of bins with internal and external temperature differences not exceeding the standard in the concrete to the total number of bins by adopting an internal and external temperature difference exceeding statistical model to obtain an evaluation value C12 of the internal and external temperature difference index;
identifying the ratio of the number of bins with the cooling rate not exceeding the standard in the concrete to the total number of bins by adopting a cooling rate exceeding statistical model to obtain an evaluation value C13 of a cooling rate index;
identifying the ratio of the number of bins with the temperature gradients of the upper layer and the lower layer which do not exceed the standard in the concrete to the total number of bins by using an upper-lower layer temperature difference standard exceeding statistical model to obtain an evaluation value C14 of the temperature gradient index;
and calculating the temperature control index evaluation value according to the highest temperature index evaluation value C11 and the weight coefficient C11, the inside and outside temperature difference index evaluation value C12 and the weight coefficient C12, the cooling rate index evaluation value C13 and the weight coefficient C13, and the temperature gradient index evaluation value C14 and the weight coefficient C14.
Optionally, in the method for collaborative safety evaluation of a high arch dam according to the embodiment of the present application, the obtaining a comprehensive evaluation value of a coordination index of the high arch dam further includes obtaining a stress control index evaluation value C2;
the acquiring of the stress control index evaluation value C2 includes:
a stress overproof range statistical model is adopted to obtain a maximum tensile stress evaluation value C21 and a maximum compressive stress evaluation value C22;
and calculating the stress control index evaluation value according to the maximum tensile stress evaluation value C21 and the weight coefficient C21, and the maximum compressive stress evaluation value C22 and the weight coefficient C22.
Optionally, in the method for collaborative safety evaluation of a high arch dam according to the embodiment of the present application, the obtaining a comprehensive evaluation value of a coordination index of the high arch dam further includes obtaining an evaluation value C3 of a deformation control index;
the acquiring of the deformation control index evaluation value C3 includes:
obtaining a forward-inclination displacement index evaluation value C31 of the dam in the construction period, a radial displacement evaluation value C32 of the dam in the water storage period, a tangential displacement evaluation value C33 of the dam in the water storage period, a vertical deformation displacement evaluation value C34 of the dam foundation and a displacement evaluation value C35 of resistance bodies on the left and right banks of the dam foundation by adopting a dam and dam foundation deformation prediction and early warning model;
and calculating the deformation control index evaluation value according to the forward tilting displacement index evaluation value C31 and the weight coefficient C31 in the dam construction period, the radial displacement evaluation value C32 and the weight coefficient C32 in the dam impoundment period, the tangential displacement evaluation value C33 and the weight coefficient C33 in the dam impoundment period, the dam foundation vertical deformation displacement evaluation value C34 and the weight coefficient C34, and the dam foundation left and right bank resistance body displacement evaluation value C35 and the weight coefficient C35.
Optionally, in the method for collaborative safety evaluation of a high arch dam according to the embodiment of the present application, the obtaining an overall comprehensive index evaluation value of the high arch dam includes obtaining a crack index evaluation value D1;
the acquiring of the crack index evaluation value D1 includes:
acquiring a crack specific position evaluation value D11 and a crack specific type evaluation value D12 by adopting a crack monitoring model;
and calculating the crack index evaluation value according to the crack specific part evaluation value D11, the weight coefficient D11, the crack specific type evaluation value D12 and the weight coefficient D12.
Optionally, in the method for collaborative safety evaluation of a high arch dam according to the embodiment of the present application, the obtaining an overall comprehensive index evaluation value of the high arch dam further includes obtaining a static stability index evaluation value D2;
the obtaining of the static stability index evaluation value D2 includes:
acquiring an overload evaluation value D21, a sliding resistance stability evaluation value D22 and a permeability stability evaluation value D23 of the high arch dam by adopting a static stability statistical model;
and calculating the static stability index evaluation value according to the arch dam overload evaluation value D21 and the weight coefficient D21, the dam foundation skid resistance stability evaluation value D22 and the weight coefficient D22, the penetration stability evaluation value D23 and the weight coefficient D23.
Optionally, in the method for collaborative safety evaluation of a high arch dam according to the embodiment of the present application, the obtaining an overall comprehensive index evaluation value of the high arch dam further includes obtaining a dynamic stability index evaluation value D3;
the acquiring of the power stability index evaluation value D3 includes:
acquiring a high arch dam anti-seismic stability index evaluation value D31 and a dam foundation anti-seismic stability evaluation value D32 by adopting a dynamic damage range statistical model;
and calculating the dynamic stability index evaluation value according to the high arch dam anti-seismic stability index evaluation value D31 and the weight coefficient D31, and the dam foundation anti-slip stability evaluation value D32 and the weight coefficient D32.
Optionally, in the method for collaborative safety evaluation of a high arch dam according to the embodiment of the present application, the comprehensive uniformity index evaluation value, the comprehensive balance index evaluation value, the comprehensive harmony index evaluation value, and the comprehensive integrity index evaluation value are obtained according to a preset period. The comprehensive evaluation value of the uniformity index, the comprehensive evaluation value of the balance index, the comprehensive evaluation value of the harmony index and the comprehensive evaluation value of the integrity index can be flexibly obtained by setting the duration of a preset period.
Optionally, in the method for collaborative evaluation of safety of a high arch dam according to the embodiment of the present application, after the determining whether the high arch dam is safe according to the final comprehensive evaluation value of safety, the method further includes:
and if the high arch dam is unsafe, inputting parameters for determining the comprehensive evaluation value of the uniformity index, the comprehensive evaluation value of the balance index, the comprehensive evaluation value of the harmony index and the comprehensive evaluation value of the integrity index into a hidden danger positioning model, and determining the hidden danger type of the high arch dam.
The hidden danger positioning model can accurately reflect hidden dangers of the high arch dam, and relevant workers can take corresponding measures in time according to the determined hidden danger type of the high arch dam.
In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a high arch dam safety collaborative evaluation device, including:
the first acquisition module is used for acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value of the uniformity index of the high arch dam and a corresponding first weight coefficient;
the second acquisition module is used for acquiring the comprehensive evaluation value of the balance index of the high arch dam and a corresponding second weight coefficient;
the third acquisition module is used for acquiring the comprehensive evaluation value of the coordination index of the high arch dam and a corresponding third weight coefficient;
the fourth acquisition module is used for acquiring the comprehensive evaluation value of the integrity index of the high arch dam and a corresponding fourth weight coefficient;
the calculation module is used for calculating the comprehensive evaluation value of the safety of the high arch dam according to the comprehensive evaluation value of the uniformity index and the corresponding first weight coefficient, the comprehensive evaluation value of the equilibrium index and the corresponding second weight coefficient, the comprehensive evaluation value of the harmony index and the corresponding third weight coefficient, the comprehensive evaluation value of the integrity index and the corresponding fourth weight coefficient;
and the judging module is used for judging whether the high arch dam is safe or not according to the final comprehensive safety evaluation value.
As can be seen from the above, in the embodiment of the present application, the comprehensive evaluation value of the uniformity index of the high arch dam and the corresponding first weight coefficient are obtained; acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value of the balance index of the high arch dam and a corresponding second weight coefficient; acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value of the harmony index of the high arch dam and a corresponding third weight coefficient; acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value of the integrity index of the high arch dam and a corresponding fourth weight coefficient; calculating a final safety comprehensive evaluation value according to the uniformity index comprehensive evaluation value and a corresponding first weight coefficient, the balance index comprehensive evaluation value and a corresponding second weight coefficient, the harmony index comprehensive evaluation value and a corresponding third weight coefficient, the integrity index comprehensive evaluation value and a corresponding fourth weight coefficient; and judging whether the high arch dam is safe or not according to the final comprehensive safety evaluation value. Because this application has proposed more comprehensive novel index evaluation system, this novel index evaluation system has covered the sub-index of safety evaluation of dam engineering construction period and operation period overall process, has effectively improved the accuracy to dam safety condition aassessment.
Additional features and advantages of the present application will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by the practice of the embodiments of the present application. The objectives and other advantages of the application may be realized and attained by the structure particularly pointed out in the written description and claims hereof as well as the appended drawings.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present application, the drawings that are required to be used in the embodiments of the present application will be briefly described below, it should be understood that the following drawings only illustrate some embodiments of the present application and therefore should not be considered as limiting the scope, and that those skilled in the art can also obtain other related drawings based on the drawings without inventive efforts.
Fig. 1 is a flowchart of a high arch dam safety collaborative evaluation method according to an embodiment of the present application.
Fig. 2 is a schematic structural diagram of a high arch dam safety collaborative evaluation device according to an embodiment of the present application.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present application, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present application, and not all of the embodiments. The components of the embodiments of the present application, generally described and illustrated in the figures herein, can be arranged and designed in a wide variety of different configurations. Thus, the following detailed description of the embodiments of the present application, presented in the accompanying drawings, is not intended to limit the scope of the claimed application, but is merely representative of selected embodiments of the application. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments of the present application without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present application.
It should be noted that: like reference numbers and letters refer to like items in the following figures, and thus, once an item is defined in one figure, it need not be further defined and explained in subsequent figures. Meanwhile, in the description of the present application, the terms "first", "second", and the like are used only for distinguishing the description, and are not to be construed as indicating or implying relative importance.
Referring to fig. 1, fig. 1 is a flowchart of a high arch dam safety collaborative evaluation method in some embodiments of the present application, which is used for comprehensively evaluating a series of index parameters related to a high arch dam construction and water storage period safety process, so as to quickly and accurately evaluate a safety state of a high arch dam. The high arch dam safety collaborative evaluation method comprises the following steps:
s101, acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value of the uniformity index of the high arch dam and a corresponding first weight coefficient;
s102, acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value of the balance index of the high arch dam and a corresponding second weight coefficient;
s103, acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value of the harmony index of the high arch dam and a corresponding third weight coefficient;
s104, acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value of the integrity index of the high arch dam and a corresponding fourth weight coefficient;
and S105, calculating a final comprehensive evaluation value of safety according to the comprehensive evaluation value of the uniformity index and the corresponding first weight coefficient, the comprehensive evaluation value of the equilibrium index and the corresponding second weight coefficient, the comprehensive evaluation value of the harmony index and the corresponding third weight coefficient, the comprehensive evaluation value of the integrity index and the corresponding fourth weight coefficient.
And S106, judging whether the high arch dam is safe or not according to the final comprehensive safety evaluation value.
Wherein, the uniformity index of the high arch dam is the uniformity of the concrete material mixing and the concrete construction vibrating quality; the high arch dam balance index is the balance of adjacent height difference, maximum height difference, cantilever height control, integral inverted suspension control and the like in the integral ascending process of the high arch dam construction; the high arch dam coordination index is the integral deformation coordination of the high arch dam, and comprises the coordination control of indexes such as temperature, stress, seepage, displacement and the like in the high arch dam construction and water storage processes; the high arch dam integrity index is the integral safety of static force and dynamic force of the high arch dam and the dam foundation.
In step S101, obtaining a comprehensive evaluation value a of uniformity index of a high arch dam includes:
s1011, adopting a statistical model of concrete mixing quality and vibration quality uniformity to obtain a concrete mixing quality index evaluation value A1 and a concrete vibration quality index evaluation value A2; s1012, acquiring an on-site core drilling sampling tensile strength index evaluation value A3, an on-site core drilling sampling ultimate tensile value index evaluation value A4 and an interlayer joint surface strength index evaluation value A5; s1013, calculating a comprehensive evaluation value of the uniformity index of the high arch dam according to the concrete mixing quality index evaluation value A1 and the weight coefficient a1, the concrete vibration quality index evaluation value A2 and the weight coefficient a2, the on-site core-drilling sampling tensile strength index evaluation value A3 and the weight coefficient A3, the on-site core-drilling sampling ultimate tensile value index evaluation value A4 and the weight coefficient a4, and the interlayer joint surface strength index evaluation value A5 and the weight coefficient a 5.
The evaluation value ranges of the concrete mixing quality index evaluation value A1 and the concrete vibration quality index evaluation value A2 are both (0, 1), and the scores of the evaluation values are all more than 0.9, which indicates that the concrete mixing quality index evaluation value A1 and the concrete vibration quality index evaluation value A2 are qualified. The evaluation value range of the on-site core-drilling sampling tensile strength index evaluation value A3 is (0, 1), the score of the evaluation value A3 is more than 0.9, the test piece is qualified, and when the ratio of the on-site core-drilling sampling test piece tensile strength index to the design strength parameter exceeds 1, the evaluation value A is 1. The evaluation value range of the on-site core drilling sampling ultimate tensile value index evaluation value A4 is (0, 1), the score of the evaluation value reaches more than 0.9, the test piece is qualified, and when the ratio of the on-site core drilling sampling test piece ultimate tensile value index to the design parameter exceeds 1, the evaluation value is 1. The evaluation value range of the interlayer bonding surface strength index evaluation value A5 is (0, 1), the score of the evaluation value A5 is more than 0.9, the evaluation value is qualified, and when the ratio of the interlayer bonding surface strength index to the design strength parameter exceeds 1, the evaluation value A is 1.
Wherein, the comprehensive evaluation value A of the uniformity index of the high arch dam is as follows:
A＝A1*a1+A2*a2+A3*a3+A4*a4+A5*a5 (1)；
the determination of the weight coefficients a1, a2, a3, a4 and a5 is obtained according to empirical values, and the risks of various indexes of different projects are classified and classified according to the difference and the importance degree of the index risks of different projects by means of similar project safety monitoring data and a project practice experience knowledge base, so that the weight coefficients in the dam safety collaborative evaluation system provided by the application are further optimized and determined.
In step S102, obtaining a comprehensive evaluation value B of the balance index of the high arch dam includes:
s1021, identifying the proportion of the number of bins, of which the adjacent height difference does not exceed the designed height difference, of the high arch dam to the total number of bins by adopting an adjacent height difference statistical model to obtain an evaluation value B1 of an adjacent height difference index; s1022, identifying the proportion of the number of bins of the high arch dam which do not exceed the designed height difference standard to the total number of bins by adopting a maximum height difference statistical model to obtain an evaluation value B2 of the maximum height difference index; s1023, identifying the proportion of the standard bin number of the cantilever height of the high arch dam which does not exceed the design to the total bin number by adopting a cantilever height statistical model to obtain an evaluation value B3 of the cantilever height index; s1024, identifying the proportion of the overall overhang height allowed by the design of the high arch dam and the actual overhang height by adopting an overall overhang degree statistical model to obtain an evaluation value B4 of an overall overhang degree index; and S1025, calculating a balance index comprehensive evaluation value of the high arch dam according to the adjacent height index evaluation value B1 and the weight coefficient B1, the maximum height index evaluation value B2 and the weight coefficient B2, the cantilever height index evaluation value B3 and the weight coefficient B3, and the evaluation value B4 and the weight coefficient B4 of the overall suspension index.
The evaluation value range of the adjacent height difference index B1 is (0, 1), and the score of the adjacent height difference index B1 is 0.9 or more, which indicates that the adjacent height difference index B is qualified. The evaluation value range of the maximum height difference index B2 is (0, 1), and the score of the maximum height difference index B2 is 0.9 or more, which indicates that the index is qualified. The evaluation value range of the cantilever height index B3 is (0, 1), and the score of the cantilever height index B3 reaches more than 0.9, which indicates that the cantilever height index is qualified. The evaluation value range of the overall overhang degree index B4 is (0, 1), and the score of the overall overhang degree index B4 is more than 0.9, which indicates that the overall overhang degree index is qualified.
Wherein, the comprehensive evaluation value B of the balance index of the high arch dam is as follows:
B＝B1*b1+B2*b2+B3*b3+B4*b4 (2)；
the determination of the weight coefficients b1, b2, b3 and b4 is obtained according to empirical values, and the risks of various indexes of different projects are classified and classified according to the difference and the importance degree of the index risks of different projects by means of similar engineering safety monitoring data and engineering practice experience knowledge bases, so that the weight coefficients in the dam safety collaborative evaluation system provided by the application are further optimized and determined.
In step S103, obtaining a comprehensive evaluation value C of the harmony index of the high arch dam includes: s1031, acquiring a temperature control index evaluation value C1;
the temperature control index evaluation value C1 is acquired and includes:
s10311, identifying the proportion of the total number of the highest temperature non-exceeding bins of each partition of the high arch dam to the actual total number of pouring bins by adopting a highest temperature exceeding statistical model to obtain an evaluation value C11 of a highest temperature index; s10312, identifying the ratio of the number of bins with internal and external temperature differences not exceeding the standard to the total number of bins by adopting an internal and external temperature difference exceeding statistical model to obtain an evaluation value C12 of the internal and external temperature difference index; s10313, identifying the ratio of the number of bins with the cooling rate not exceeding the standard in the concrete to the total number of bins by adopting a cooling rate exceeding statistical model to obtain an evaluation value C13 of the cooling rate index; s10314, identifying the ratio of the number of bins with the temperature gradients of the upper layer and the lower layer not exceeding the standard in the concrete to the total number of bins by adopting an upper-layer and lower-layer temperature difference exceeding statistical model to obtain an evaluation value C14 of the temperature gradient index; and S10315, calculating a temperature control index evaluation value according to the highest temperature index evaluation value C11 and the weight coefficient C11, the inside and outside temperature difference index evaluation value C12 and the weight coefficient C12, the cooling rate index evaluation value C13 and the weight coefficient C13, and the temperature gradient index evaluation value C14 and the weight coefficient C14.
The evaluation value range of the highest temperature index is (0, 1), the general score of the basic constraint area and the weak constraint area reaches more than 0.9 to represent the qualification, and the general score of the non-constraint area reaches more than 0.85 to represent the qualification; wherein, the evaluation value range of the index of the internal and external temperature difference is (0, 1), and the score of the index reaches more than 0.9, which indicates that the index is qualified; wherein, the evaluation value range of the temperature reduction rate index is (0, 1), and the score of the evaluation value range reaches more than 0.9, which indicates that the product is qualified; wherein, the evaluation value range of the temperature gradient index is (0, 1), and the score of the temperature gradient index reaches more than 0.9, which indicates that the temperature gradient index is qualified.
The temperature control index evaluation value C1 is:
C1＝C11*c11+C12*c12+C13*c13+C14*c14 (3)；
the determination of the weight coefficients c11, c12, c13 and c14 is obtained according to empirical values, and the risks of various indexes of different projects are classified and classified according to the difference and the importance degree of the index risks of different projects by means of similar engineering safety monitoring data and engineering practice experience knowledge bases, so that the weight coefficients in the dam safety collaborative evaluation system provided by the application are further optimized and determined.
In step S103, obtaining a comprehensive evaluation value of the high arch dam coordination index further includes: s1032, acquiring a stress control index evaluation value C2;
the stress control index evaluation value C2 is acquired and includes:
s10321, obtaining a maximum tensile stress evaluation value C21 by adopting a stress standard exceeding range statistical model; s10322, obtaining a maximum compressive stress evaluation value C22 by adopting a stress standard exceeding range statistical model; s10323, calculating a stress control index evaluation value according to the maximum tensile stress evaluation value C21 and the weight coefficient C21, and the maximum compressive stress evaluation value C22 and the weight coefficient C22;
the value ranges of the maximum tensile stress evaluation value and the maximum compressive stress evaluation value are both (0, 1), and the score of the maximum tensile stress evaluation value and the maximum compressive stress evaluation value is more than 0.9, which indicates that the evaluation value is qualified.
The stress control index evaluation value C2 is:
C2＝C21*c21+C22*c22 (4)；
the weight coefficients c21 and c22 are obtained according to empirical values, and the risks of various indexes of different projects are classified according to the difference and the importance degree of the index risks of different projects by means of the safety monitoring data of the same project and the experience knowledge base of the engineering practice, so that the weight coefficients in the dam safety collaborative evaluation system provided by the application are further optimized and determined.
In step S103, obtaining a comprehensive evaluation value of the coordination index of the high arch dam further includes: s1033, acquiring a deformation control index evaluation value C3;
the deformation control index evaluation value C3 is acquired including:
s10331, obtaining a forward-inclination displacement index evaluation value C31 of the dam in the construction period by adopting a dam body and dam foundation deformation prediction and early warning model; s10332, obtaining radial displacement evaluation values C32 and S10333 of a dam body in a dam body water storage period by adopting a dam body and dam foundation deformation prediction and early warning model, obtaining tangential displacement evaluation values C33 and S10334 of the dam body in the dam body water storage period by adopting the dam body and dam foundation deformation prediction and early warning model, obtaining dam foundation vertical deformation displacement evaluation values C34 and S10335 by adopting the dam body and dam foundation deformation prediction and early warning model, and obtaining dam foundation left and right bank resistance body displacement evaluation values C35 by adopting the dam body and dam foundation deformation prediction and early warning model; s10336, calculating a deformation control index evaluation value according to the forward tilting displacement index evaluation value C31 and the weight index coefficient C31 in the dam construction period, the radial displacement evaluation value C32 and the weight index coefficient C32 in the dam impoundment period, the tangential displacement evaluation value C33 and the weight index coefficient C33 in the dam impoundment period, the dam foundation vertical deformation displacement evaluation value C34 and the weight index coefficient C34, and the dam foundation left and right bank resistance body displacement evaluation values C35 and the weight index coefficient C35.
The deformation control index evaluation value C3 is:
C3＝C31*c31+C32*c32+C33*c33+C34*c34+C35*c35 (5)；
the weight coefficients c31, c32, c33, c34 and c35 are obtained according to empirical values, risks of various indexes of different projects are classified according to differences and importance degrees of the indexes of different projects by means of similar project safety monitoring data and a project practice experience knowledge base, and the weight coefficients in the dam safety collaborative evaluation system are further optimized and determined.
Considering that the concrete arch dam is a three-dimensional arch beam partial load bearing body, the dam body deformation index C3 and related sub factors have larger adjustment redundancy, the deformation control index can be adjusted by comprehensively considering the deformation condition of similar engineering, and the weight proportion can be dynamically adjusted in an engineering analogy mode on the premise of designing the allowable deformation index (or interval range).
In step S103, obtaining the comprehensive evaluation value of the high arch dam coordination index further includes: s1034, calculating a comprehensive evaluation value of the harmony index of the high arch dam according to the temperature control index evaluation value C1 and the weight index coefficient C1, the stress control index evaluation value C2 and the weight index coefficient C2, the deformation control index evaluation value C3 and the weight index coefficient C3.
Wherein, the comprehensive evaluation value C of the coordination index of the high arch dam is as follows:
C＝C1*c1+C2*c2+C3*c3 (6)；
the weight coefficients c1, c2 and c3 are obtained according to empirical values, risks of various indexes of different projects are classified according to differences and importance degrees of the indexes of different projects by means of similar project safety monitoring data and a project practice experience knowledge base, and the weight coefficients in the dam safety collaborative evaluation system are further optimized and determined.
In step S104, obtaining a comprehensive evaluation value D of the integrity index of the high arch dam includes: s1041, obtaining a crack index evaluation value D1:
the crack index evaluation value D1 is obtained and includes:
s10411, acquiring a crack specific part evaluation value D11 by adopting a crack monitoring model; s10412, acquiring a crack specific type evaluation value D12 by using a crack monitoring model; and S10413, calculating a crack index evaluation value according to the crack specific part evaluation value D11, the weight coefficient D11, the crack specific type evaluation value D12 and the weight coefficient D12.
The evaluation value ranges of the evaluation value of the specific crack part and the evaluation value of the specific crack type are both (0, 1), and the score of the evaluation value reaches more than 0.9, which indicates that the crack is qualified. When no crack exists in the high arch dam, the crack index evaluation value D1 is 1; when a crack exists in the high arch dam, the position where the crack appears needs to be determined firstly, the position mainly comprises an upstream part, an inner part, a downstream part and a gallery, and the cracks of different positions correspond to different coefficients; and secondly, judging the type of the crack, and judging whether the stability of the crack can be controlled.
The crack index evaluation value D1 is:
D1＝D11*d11+D12*d12 (7)；
the weight coefficients d11 and d12 are obtained according to empirical values, and the risks of various indexes of different projects are classified and classified according to the difference and the importance degree of the index risks of different projects by means of the safety monitoring data of the same project and the experience knowledge base of the engineering practice, so that the weight coefficients in the dam safety collaborative evaluation system provided by the application are further optimized and determined.
In step S104, obtaining a comprehensive evaluation value D of the integrity index of the high arch dam, further including: s1042, obtaining a static stability index evaluation value D2:
acquiring a static stability index evaluation value D2, comprising:
s10421, acquiring a dam overload evaluation value D21 by adopting a static stability statistical model; s10422, acquiring a dam foundation anti-slip stability evaluation value D22 by adopting a static stability statistical model; s10423, acquiring a permeability stability evaluation value D23 by adopting a static stability statistical model; s10424, calculating a static stability index evaluation value according to the dam overload evaluation value D21 and the weight coefficient D21, the dam foundation anti-skid stability evaluation value D22 and the weight coefficient D22, and the seepage stability evaluation value D23 and the weight coefficient D23;
wherein the static stability index evaluation value D2 is:
D2＝D21*d21+D22*d22+D23*d23 (8)；
the weight coefficients d21, d22 and d23 are obtained according to empirical values, risks of various indexes of different projects are classified according to differences and importance degrees of the indexes of different projects by means of similar project safety monitoring data and a project practice experience knowledge base, and the weight coefficients in the dam safety collaborative evaluation system are further optimized and determined.
In step S104, obtaining a comprehensive evaluation value D of the integrity index of the high arch dam, further including: s1043, obtaining a dynamic stability index evaluation value D3:
the power stability index evaluation value D3 is acquired and includes:
s10431, acquiring a high arch dam anti-seismic stability index evaluation value D31 by adopting a dynamic damage range statistical model; s10432, acquiring a high arch dam foundation anti-seismic stability evaluation value D32 by adopting a dynamic damage range statistical model; and S10433, calculating a dynamic stability index evaluation value according to the dam anti-seismic stability index evaluation value D31 and the weight coefficient D31, and the dam foundation anti-slip stability evaluation value D32 and the weight coefficient D32.
The power stability index evaluation value D3 is:
D3＝D31*d31+D32*d32 (9)；
the weight coefficients d31 and d32 are obtained according to empirical values, and the risks of various indexes of different projects are classified and classified according to the difference and the importance degree of the index risks of different projects by means of the safety monitoring data of the same project and the experience knowledge base of the engineering practice, so that the weight coefficients in the dam safety collaborative evaluation system provided by the application are further optimized and determined.
In step S104, obtaining the comprehensive evaluation value of the integrity index of the high arch dam further includes:
and S1044, calculating a comprehensive evaluation value of the integrity index of the high arch dam according to the crack index evaluation value D1 and the weight coefficient D1, the static stability index evaluation value D2 and the weight coefficient D2, and the dynamic stability index evaluation value D3 and the weight coefficient D3.
The weight coefficients d1, d2 and d3 are obtained according to empirical values, risks of various indexes of different projects are classified according to differences and importance degrees of the indexes of different projects by means of similar project safety monitoring data and a project practice experience knowledge base, and the weight coefficients in the dam safety collaborative evaluation system are further optimized and determined.
The parameter indexes of the whole process of high arch dam construction-water storage and operation, which are obtained by the parameter statistical models, can be obtained according to a preset period, wherein the preset period can be 10 seconds, 10 minutes, one hour and the like.
When the preset period is set to be short, each parameter statistical model can achieve real-time acquisition of various indexes of the high arch dam and can provide real-time data for safety assessment of the dam.
The whole process of high arch dam construction, water storage and operation is monitored by monitoring sensors such as a temperature sensor, a displacement sensor, a stress strain sensor, an osmometer and a joint meter through the parameter statistical models, and data acquired according to a preset period is transmitted to the parameter statistical models by utilizing a remote communication network technology. For example, the remote communication network technology can be combined with ethernet and 5G technologies to realize wireless network full coverage, and finally realize remote transmission of data acquired by the monitoring sensor.
Further, the monitoring sensor transmits the acquired data to each parameter statistical model, and the transmission mode can be passive transmission or active transmission; wherein, the passive transmission is a data transmission end of the monitoring sensor through manual control; the active transmission is that the monitoring sensor directly transmits the data acquired by the monitoring sensor according to a preset period to each parameter statistical model through a remote communication network technology.
It can be understood that, in some embodiments, before the steps S101 to S104, a real-time feedback simulation system of the high arch dam is further constructed according to the engineering information and the safety information monitoring data, and the simulation system can perform real-time tracking and simulation on the actual construction process of the dam to obtain the real working state of the dam. And the method is used for feeding back the related index evaluation values acquired by the different types of parameter statistical models in real time to the simulation system for related evaluation operation.
In step S105, the uniformity index a and the corresponding first weight coefficient a, the balance index B and the corresponding second weight coefficient B, the harmony index C and the corresponding third weight coefficient C, the integrity index D and the corresponding fourth weight coefficient D of the high arch dam are obtained according to the above steps S101 to S104. The initial values of the four index weight coefficients a, B, C and D can be verified according to the big data of the built project and a project experience knowledge base, and a final comprehensive safety evaluation value is calculated according to the uniformity index evaluation value A of the high arch dam, the corresponding first weight coefficient a, the balance index evaluation value B, the corresponding second weight coefficient B, the harmony index evaluation value C, the corresponding third weight coefficient C, the integrity index evaluation value D and the corresponding fourth weight coefficient D, and the evaluation values are used as the basis for judging whether the dam is safe.
Wherein, the comprehensive safety index evaluation value F of the high arch dam is as follows:
F＝A*a+B*b+C*c+D*d (10)；
in step S106, it is determined whether the high arch dam is safe according to the final comprehensive safety evaluation value. And if the high arch dam is unsafe, inputting parameters for determining a comprehensive evaluation value of the uniformity index, a comprehensive evaluation value of the balance index, a comprehensive evaluation value of the harmony index and a comprehensive evaluation value of the integrity index into a hidden danger positioning model, and determining the hidden danger type of the high arch dam.
Optionally, after the hidden danger type of the high arch dam is determined, the hidden danger type information may be fed back to a department related to the hidden danger type, and the related department may take corresponding measures.
The statistical model of the mixing quality and the vibrating quality uniformity, the statistical model of the adjacent height difference, the statistical model of the maximum height difference, the statistical model of the cantilever height, the statistical model of the overall overhang degree, the statistical model of the maximum temperature exceeding standard, the statistical model of the internal and external temperature difference exceeding standard, the statistical model of the cooling rate exceeding standard, the statistical model of the upper and lower layer temperature difference exceeding standard, the statistical model of the stress exceeding standard range, the prediction and early warning model of the deformation of the dam body and the dam foundation, the crack monitoring model, the static stability statistical model and the dynamic damage range statistical model are obtained by deep training of network models according to corresponding mass data, and parameters of each network statistical model are correspondingly adjusted according to the data obtained in real time, so that each parameter statistical model can truly simulate the working state of the high arch dam.
As can be seen from the above, in the embodiment of the present application, the comprehensive evaluation value of the uniformity index of the high arch dam and the corresponding first weight coefficient are obtained; acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value of the balance index of the high arch dam and a corresponding second weight coefficient; acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value of the harmony index of the high arch dam and a corresponding third weight coefficient; acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value of the integrity index of the high arch dam and a corresponding fourth weight coefficient; calculating a final safety comprehensive evaluation value according to the uniformity index comprehensive evaluation value and a corresponding first weight coefficient, the balance index comprehensive evaluation value and a corresponding second weight coefficient, the harmony index comprehensive evaluation value and a corresponding third weight coefficient, the integrity index comprehensive evaluation value and a corresponding fourth weight coefficient; and judging whether the high arch dam is safe or not according to the final comprehensive safety evaluation value. Because this application has proposed more comprehensive novel index evaluation system, this novel index evaluation system has covered the sub-index of safety evaluation of dam engineering construction period and operation period overall process, has effectively improved the accurate aassessment to dam safe state.
Referring to fig. 2, fig. 2 is a schematic structural diagram of a high arch dam safety cooperative evaluation device in an embodiment of the present application. This high arch dam safety collaborative evaluation device includes: a first obtaining module 201, a second obtaining module 202, a third obtaining module 203, a fourth obtaining module 204, a calculating module 205 and a judging module 206.
The first obtaining module 201 is configured to obtain a comprehensive evaluation value of the uniformity index of the high arch dam and a corresponding first weight coefficient.
The second obtaining module 202 is configured to obtain a comprehensive evaluation value of the balance index of the high arch dam and a corresponding second weight coefficient.
The third obtaining module 203 is configured to obtain a comprehensive evaluation value of the coordination index of the high arch dam and a corresponding third weight coefficient.
The fourth obtaining module 204 is configured to obtain a comprehensive evaluation value of the integrity index of the high arch dam and a corresponding fourth weight coefficient.
The calculating module 205 is configured to calculate a comprehensive evaluation value of security of the high arch dam according to the comprehensive evaluation value of uniformity index of the high arch dam and a corresponding first weight coefficient, the comprehensive evaluation value of balance index and a corresponding second weight coefficient, the comprehensive evaluation value of coordination index and a corresponding third weight coefficient, the comprehensive evaluation value of integrity index and a corresponding fourth weight coefficient;
the determining module 206 determines whether the high arch dam is safe according to the final comprehensive evaluation value of safety.
As can be seen from the above, in the embodiment of the present application, the comprehensive evaluation value of the uniformity index of the high arch dam and the corresponding first weight coefficient are obtained; acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value of the balance index of the high arch dam and a corresponding second weight coefficient; acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value of the harmony index of the high arch dam and a corresponding third weight coefficient; acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value of the integrity index of the high arch dam and a corresponding fourth weight coefficient; calculating a final safety comprehensive evaluation value according to the uniformity index comprehensive evaluation value and a corresponding first weight coefficient, the balance index comprehensive evaluation value and a corresponding second weight coefficient, the harmony index comprehensive evaluation value and a corresponding third weight coefficient, the integrity index comprehensive evaluation value and a corresponding fourth weight coefficient; and judging whether the high arch dam is safe or not according to the final comprehensive safety evaluation value. Because this application has proposed more comprehensive novel index evaluation system, this novel index evaluation system has covered the sub-index of safety evaluation of dam engineering construction period and operation period overall process, has effectively improved the accurate aassessment to dam safe state.
In the embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed apparatus and method may be implemented in other ways. The above-described embodiments of the apparatus are merely illustrative, and for example, the division of the units is only one logical division, and there may be other divisions when actually implemented, and for example, a plurality of units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be omitted, or not executed. In addition, the shown or discussed mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection may be an indirect coupling or communication connection of devices or units through some communication interfaces, and may be in an electrical, mechanical or other form.
In addition, units described as separate parts may or may not be physically separate, and parts displayed as units may or may not be physical units, may be located in one place, or may be distributed on a plurality of network units. Some or all of the units can be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of the embodiment.
Furthermore, the functional modules in the embodiments of the present application may be integrated together to form an independent part, or each module may exist separately, or two or more modules may be integrated to form an independent part.
In this document, relational terms such as first and second, and the like may be used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions.
The above description is only an example of the present application and is not intended to limit the scope of the present application, and various modifications and changes may be made by those skilled in the art. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement and the like made within the spirit and principle of the present application shall be included in the protection scope of the present application.
Claims (10)
1. A method for the safety collaborative evaluation of a high arch dam is characterized by comprising the following steps:
acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value of the uniformity index of the high arch dam and a corresponding first weight coefficient;
acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value of the balance index of the high arch dam and a corresponding second weight coefficient;
acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value of the harmony index of the high arch dam and a corresponding third weight coefficient;
acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value of the integrity index of the high arch dam and a corresponding fourth weight coefficient;
calculating a final safety comprehensive evaluation value according to the uniformity index comprehensive evaluation value and a corresponding first weight coefficient, the balance index comprehensive evaluation value and a corresponding second weight coefficient, the harmony index comprehensive evaluation value and a corresponding third weight coefficient, the integrity index comprehensive evaluation value and a corresponding fourth weight coefficient;
and judging whether the high arch dam is safe or not according to the final comprehensive safety evaluation value.
2. The method for the cooperative high arch dam safety evaluation according to claim 1, wherein obtaining the comprehensive high arch dam uniformity index evaluation value comprises:
acquiring a concrete mixing quality index evaluation value A1 and a concrete vibrating quality index evaluation value A2 by adopting a statistical model of concrete mixing quality and vibrating quality uniformity;
acquiring an on-site core drilling sampling tensile strength index evaluation value A3, an on-site core drilling sampling ultimate tensile value index evaluation value A4 and an interlayer joint surface strength index evaluation value A5;
and calculating the comprehensive evaluation value of the uniformity index of the high arch dam according to the evaluation value A1 and the weight coefficient a1 of the concrete mixing quality index, the evaluation value A2 and the weight coefficient a2 of the concrete vibration quality index, the evaluation value A3 and the weight coefficient A3 of the on-site core drilling sampling tensile strength index, the evaluation value A4 and the weight coefficient a4 of the on-site core drilling sampling ultimate tensile value index, the evaluation value A5 of the interlayer junction surface strength index and the weight coefficient a5 of the on-site core drilling sampling ultimate tensile value index.
3. The method for the high arch dam safety collaborative evaluation according to claim 1, wherein the obtaining of the comprehensive evaluation value of the equilibrium index of the high arch dam comprises:
identifying the proportion of the number of bins of which the adjacent height difference does not exceed the designed height difference to the total number of bins by using an adjacent height difference statistical model to obtain an evaluation value B1 of an adjacent height difference index;
identifying the proportion of the number of bins of the high arch dam which do not exceed the designed height difference standard to the total number of bins by adopting a maximum height difference statistical model to obtain an evaluation value B2 of the maximum height difference index;
identifying the proportion of the standard bin number of the cantilever height of the high arch dam which does not exceed the design to the total bin number by adopting a cantilever height statistical model to obtain an evaluation value B3 of the cantilever height index;
identifying the proportion of the overall overhang height allowed by the design of the high arch dam and the actual overhang height by adopting an overall overhang degree statistical model to obtain an evaluation value B4 of an overall overhang degree index;
and calculating a balance index comprehensive evaluation value of the high arch dam according to the adjacent height index evaluation value B1 and the weight coefficient B1, the maximum height index evaluation value B2 and the weight coefficient B2, the cantilever height index evaluation value B3 and the weight coefficient B3, and the evaluation value B4 and the weight coefficient B4 of the overall suspension index.
4. The method for high arch dam safety collaborative evaluation according to claim 1, wherein obtaining the comprehensive evaluation value of the harmony index of the high arch dam comprises obtaining an evaluation value of a temperature control index C1;
the acquiring of the temperature control index evaluation value C1 includes:
identifying the proportion of the total number of the highest temperature not exceeding bins of each partition of the high arch dam to the actual total number of poured bins by adopting a highest temperature exceeding statistical model to obtain an evaluation value C11 of a highest temperature index;
identifying the ratio of the number of bins with internal and external temperature differences not exceeding the standard in the concrete to the total number of bins by adopting an internal and external temperature difference exceeding statistical model to obtain an evaluation value C12 of the internal and external temperature difference index;
identifying the ratio of the number of bins with the cooling rate not exceeding the standard in the concrete to the total number of bins by adopting a cooling rate exceeding statistical model to obtain an evaluation value C13 of a cooling rate index;
identifying the ratio of the number of bins with the temperature gradients of the upper layer and the lower layer which do not exceed the standard in the concrete to the total number of bins by using an upper-lower layer temperature difference standard exceeding statistical model to obtain an evaluation value C14 of the temperature gradient index;
and calculating the temperature control index evaluation value according to the highest temperature index evaluation value C11 and the weight coefficient C11, the inside and outside temperature difference index evaluation value C12 and the weight coefficient C12, the cooling rate index evaluation value C13 and the weight coefficient C13, and the temperature gradient index evaluation value C14 and the weight coefficient C14.
5. The method for high arch dam safety cooperative evaluation according to claim 4, wherein the obtaining of the comprehensive evaluation value of coordination index of high arch dam further comprises obtaining a stress control index evaluation value C2, obtaining a deformation control index evaluation value C3;
the acquiring of the stress control index evaluation value C2 includes:
a stress overproof range statistical model is adopted to obtain a maximum tensile stress evaluation value C21 and a maximum compressive stress evaluation value C22;
calculating the stress control index evaluation value according to the maximum tensile stress evaluation value C21 and the weight coefficient C21, and the maximum compressive stress evaluation value C22 and the weight coefficient C22;
the acquiring of the deformation control index evaluation value C3 includes:
obtaining a forward-inclination displacement index evaluation value C31 of the dam in the construction period, a radial displacement evaluation value C32 of the dam in the water storage period, a tangential displacement evaluation value C33 of the dam in the water storage period, a vertical deformation displacement evaluation value C34 of the dam foundation and a displacement evaluation value C35 of resistance bodies on the left and right banks of the dam foundation by adopting a dam and dam foundation deformation prediction and early warning model;
and calculating the deformation control index evaluation value according to the forward tilting displacement index evaluation value C31 and the weight coefficient C31 in the dam construction period, the radial displacement evaluation value C32 and the weight coefficient C32 in the dam impoundment period, the tangential displacement evaluation value C33 and the weight coefficient C33 in the dam impoundment period, the dam foundation vertical deformation displacement evaluation value C34 and the weight coefficient C34, and the dam foundation left and right bank resistance body displacement evaluation value C35 and the weight coefficient C35.
6. The method for high arch dam safety collaborative evaluation according to claim 1, wherein obtaining the integral comprehensive index evaluation value of the high arch dam comprises obtaining a crack index evaluation value D1;
the acquiring of the crack index evaluation value D1 includes:
acquiring a crack specific position evaluation value D11 and a crack specific type evaluation value D12 by adopting a crack monitoring model;
and calculating the crack index evaluation value according to the crack specific part evaluation value D11, the weight coefficient D11, the crack specific type evaluation value D12 and the weight coefficient D12.
7. The method for the collaborative evaluation of the safety of the high arch dam according to claim 6, wherein the obtaining of the evaluation value of the comprehensive indexes of the integrity of the high arch dam further comprises obtaining an evaluation value of static stability indexes D2, obtaining an evaluation value of dynamic stability indexes D3;
the obtaining of the static stability index evaluation value D2 includes:
acquiring an overload evaluation value D21, a sliding resistance stability evaluation value D22 and a permeability stability evaluation value D23 of the high arch dam by adopting a static stability statistical model;
calculating the static stability index evaluation value according to the high arch dam overload evaluation value D21 and the weight coefficient D21, the dam foundation anti-skid stability evaluation value D22 and the weight coefficient D22, the penetration stability evaluation value D23 and the weight coefficient D23;
the acquiring of the power stability index evaluation value D3 includes:
acquiring a high arch dam anti-seismic stability index evaluation value D31 and a dam foundation anti-seismic stability evaluation value D32 by adopting a dynamic damage range statistical model;
and calculating the dynamic stability index evaluation value according to the high arch dam anti-seismic stability index evaluation value D31 and the weight coefficient D31, and the dam foundation anti-slip stability evaluation value D32 and the weight coefficient D32.
8. The method for high arch dam safety collaborative evaluation according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the uniformity index comprehensive evaluation value, the balance index comprehensive evaluation value, the harmony index comprehensive evaluation value, and the integrity index comprehensive evaluation value are obtained according to a preset period.
9. The method for collaborative evaluation of safety of a high arch dam according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein after the determining whether the high arch dam is safe according to the final comprehensive evaluation value of safety, the method further comprises:
and if the high arch dam is unsafe, inputting parameters for determining the comprehensive evaluation value of the uniformity index, the comprehensive evaluation value of the balance index, the comprehensive evaluation value of the harmony index and the comprehensive evaluation value of the integrity index into a hidden danger positioning model, and determining the hidden danger type of the high arch dam.
10. A high arch dam safety collaborative evaluation device is characterized by comprising:
the first acquisition module is used for acquiring a comprehensive evaluation value of the uniformity index of the high arch dam and a corresponding first weight coefficient;
the second acquisition module is used for acquiring the comprehensive evaluation value of the balance index of the high arch dam and a corresponding second weight coefficient;
the third acquisition module is used for acquiring the comprehensive evaluation value of the coordination index of the high arch dam and a corresponding third weight coefficient;
the fourth acquisition module is used for acquiring the comprehensive evaluation value of the integrity index of the high arch dam and a corresponding fourth weight coefficient;
the calculation module is used for calculating the comprehensive evaluation value of the safety of the high arch dam according to the comprehensive evaluation value of the uniformity index and the corresponding first weight coefficient, the comprehensive evaluation value of the equilibrium index and the corresponding second weight coefficient, the comprehensive evaluation value of the harmony index and the corresponding third weight coefficient, the comprehensive evaluation value of the integrity index and the corresponding fourth weight coefficient;
and the judging module is used for judging whether the high arch dam is safe or not according to the final comprehensive safety evaluation value.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202011274802.3A CN112488466B (en) | 2020-11-13 | 2020-11-13 | High arch dam safety cooperative evaluation method and device |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202011274802.3A CN112488466B (en) | 2020-11-13 | 2020-11-13 | High arch dam safety cooperative evaluation method and device |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN112488466A true CN112488466A (en) | 2021-03-12 |
| CN112488466B CN112488466B (en) | 2024-07-23 |
Family
ID=74930613
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202011274802.3A Active CN112488466B (en) | 2020-11-13 | 2020-11-13 | High arch dam safety cooperative evaluation method and device |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN112488466B (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN117114240A (en) * | 2023-09-07 | 2023-11-24 | 长江水利委员会长江科学院 | Safety evaluation method, system, equipment and medium for heightened gravity dam structure |
Citations (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4659252A (en) * | 1985-09-04 | 1987-04-21 | Parrott, Ely And Hurt Consulting Engineers, Inc. | RCC dam construction and method |
| JP2013053456A (en) * | 2011-09-05 | 2013-03-21 | Sato Kogyo Co Ltd | Overhang-section and balustrade-section structure of concrete dam, and construction method for overhang section and balustrade section |
| CN104678954A (en) * | 2015-01-23 | 2015-06-03 | 中国长江三峡集团公司 | Dam safety intelligent monitoring and pre-warning system based on full life circle and method thereof |
| CN106355540A (en) * | 2016-09-18 | 2017-01-25 | 三峡大学 | Small- and medium-sized reservoir dam safety evaluating method based on GRA-BP (grey relational analysis and back propagation) neural network |
| CN107133408A (en) * | 2017-05-12 | 2017-09-05 | 中国水利水电科学研究院 | A kind of dam body performance estimating method and device |
| CN110374047A (en) * | 2019-05-28 | 2019-10-25 | 中国水利水电科学研究院 | Arch dam runtime real-time security monitoring Threshold based on deformation |
| CN111551147A (en) * | 2020-06-09 | 2020-08-18 | 福州大学 | Arch dam surface deformation monitoring system based on GNSS and measuring robot fusion |
| CN111814374A (en) * | 2020-07-07 | 2020-10-23 | 中国水利水电科学研究院 | Earthquake response analysis and safety assessment method in arch dam construction period |
-
2020
- 2020-11-13 CN CN202011274802.3A patent/CN112488466B/en active Active
Patent Citations (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4659252A (en) * | 1985-09-04 | 1987-04-21 | Parrott, Ely And Hurt Consulting Engineers, Inc. | RCC dam construction and method |
| JP2013053456A (en) * | 2011-09-05 | 2013-03-21 | Sato Kogyo Co Ltd | Overhang-section and balustrade-section structure of concrete dam, and construction method for overhang section and balustrade section |
| CN104678954A (en) * | 2015-01-23 | 2015-06-03 | 中国长江三峡集团公司 | Dam safety intelligent monitoring and pre-warning system based on full life circle and method thereof |
| CN106355540A (en) * | 2016-09-18 | 2017-01-25 | 三峡大学 | Small- and medium-sized reservoir dam safety evaluating method based on GRA-BP (grey relational analysis and back propagation) neural network |
| CN107133408A (en) * | 2017-05-12 | 2017-09-05 | 中国水利水电科学研究院 | A kind of dam body performance estimating method and device |
| CN110374047A (en) * | 2019-05-28 | 2019-10-25 | 中国水利水电科学研究院 | Arch dam runtime real-time security monitoring Threshold based on deformation |
| CN111551147A (en) * | 2020-06-09 | 2020-08-18 | 福州大学 | Arch dam surface deformation monitoring system based on GNSS and measuring robot fusion |
| CN111814374A (en) * | 2020-07-07 | 2020-10-23 | 中国水利水电科学研究院 | Earthquake response analysis and safety assessment method in arch dam construction period |
Non-Patent Citations (5)
| Title |
|---|
| 冯学慧;: "基于熵权法与正态云模型的大坝安全综合评价", 水电能源科学, no. 11, pages 58 - 60 * |
| 杨海娇;辛全才;申玲玲;: "混凝土坝实测性态的可变模糊综合评价", 水力发电, no. 10 * |
| 郭芝韵;苏怀智;刘炳锐;储冬冬;: "基于云模型与证据理论的大坝安全综合评估方法", 水利水电技术, no. 03 * |
| 顾冲时等: "《特高拱坝变形安全监控理论和方法及其应用》", 31 December 2018, 河海大学出版社, pages: 287 - 288 * |
| 高健, 黄海燕, 周登峰: "拱坝安全度模糊综合评判模型", 河海大学学报(自然科学版), no. 02 * |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN117114240A (en) * | 2023-09-07 | 2023-11-24 | 长江水利委员会长江科学院 | Safety evaluation method, system, equipment and medium for heightened gravity dam structure |
| CN117114240B (en) * | 2023-09-07 | 2024-03-12 | 长江水利委员会长江科学院 | Safety evaluation method, system, equipment and medium for heightened gravity dam structure |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN112488466B (en) | 2024-07-23 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | Structural health monitoring for a 600 m high skyscraper | |
| CN111622252B (en) | Intelligent control system and control method for whole process of large open caisson construction | |
| CN106227977B (en) | A kind of method of the steel structure net rack hydraulic pressure lift time-varying finite element analysis based on BIM | |
| CN110263461B (en) | Bridge safety monitoring and early warning system based on BIM | |
| CN101763053B (en) | Movable type bridge security detection and analysis management system | |
| WO2020188585A1 (en) | System and method for structural health monitoring using internet of things and machine learning | |
| CN101408951B (en) | Method for obtaining equivalent load spectrum and estimating weariness residual longevity of bridge crane based on neural network | |
| CN102128725A (en) | Method for monitoring health and pre-warning safety of large-span space structure | |
| CN107292545A (en) | A kind of Summary of seismic analysis for bridges based on seismic risk assessment | |
| CN104281920A (en) | Tailing pond layered index safety assessment and early-warning method and system | |
| CN104678954A (en) | Dam safety intelligent monitoring and pre-warning system based on full life circle and method thereof | |
| CN113900381B (en) | Steel structure remote health monitoring platform based on Internet of things and application method | |
| CN107701236B (en) | A kind of multiple information data monitoring system of skip loading pocket | |
| CN102162773A (en) | Clustered-type bridge health real-time monitoring system and method based on wireless communication technology | |
| CN101504333B (en) | Progressive health monitoring method for cable structure median cord system based on strain monitoring | |
| CN101806664B (en) | Progressive health monitoring method of cable system based on mixed monitoring in presence of support seat settlement | |
| CN106600153A (en) | Tailing pond dam break risk evaluating method | |
| CN101477340A (en) | Progressive health monitoring method for cable system in cable structure based on cable force monitoring | |
| CN106886848A (en) | Bridge construction information acquisition management system | |
| CN110703712B (en) | Industrial control system information security attack risk assessment method and system | |
| CN109490072A (en) | A kind of civil engineering work detection system and its detection method | |
| CN104456092A (en) | Multidimensional assessment method of petroleum and natural gas pipeline warning priority | |
| CN106803149A (en) | Bridge construction information acquisition management method | |
| CN112488466A (en) | High arch dam safety collaborative evaluation method and device | |
| CN115906663A (en) | Building safety evaluation model establishing method, evaluation method, server and system |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| CB02 | Change of applicant information | ||
| CB02 | Change of applicant information |
Country or region after: China Address after: 101100 room 206-20, 2nd floor, building 1, No.1 courtyard, Gongyuan street, Tongzhou District, Beijing Applicant after: China Three Gorges Construction Engineering (Group) Co.,Ltd. Applicant after: China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research Address before: 101100 room 206-20, 2nd floor, building 1, No.1 courtyard, Gongyuan street, Tongzhou District, Beijing Applicant before: CHINA THREE GORGES PROJECTS DEVELOPMENT Co.,Ltd. Country or region before: China Applicant before: China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research |
|
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |