CN112328500A - Method for automatically generating black box test case - Google Patents
Method for automatically generating black box test case Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN112328500A CN112328500A CN202011367528.4A CN202011367528A CN112328500A CN 112328500 A CN112328500 A CN 112328500A CN 202011367528 A CN202011367528 A CN 202011367528A CN 112328500 A CN112328500 A CN 112328500A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- black box
- box test
- test case
- boundary value
- test cases
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 51
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 50
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000000638 solvent extraction Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000013522 software testing Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000004904 shortening Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
- G06F11/3672—Test management
- G06F11/3684—Test management for test design, e.g. generating new test cases
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
- G06F11/3672—Test management
- G06F11/3688—Test management for test execution, e.g. scheduling of test suites
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to the field of software testing, in particular to a method for automatically generating a black box test case, which comprises the following steps: s1, the user inputs the data of the tested object according to the requirement; s2, selecting a black box test case design method; s3, generating a black box test case, solving the problems of long time and low coverage of the black box test case, shortening the software development period and improving the efficiency.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of software testing, in particular to a method for automatically generating a black box test case.
Background
Under the development that software testing is more and more emphasized, software testing flow is more systematic, software testing becomes an indispensable important step in the software development life cycle, the black box test case is tested from the corresponding relation of input data and output data from the perspective of a user, no matter in a traditional development mode or an agile development mode, the user is necessary to design the black box test case, the black box test case needs to be reusable, and under the condition of high coverage, the user needs to spend a large amount of time to design the black box test case, so that the practicability is poor, and the efficiency is low.
Disclosure of Invention
Based on the problems, the invention provides a method for automatically generating the black box test case, which solves the problems of long time and low coverage of the black box test case, shortens the software development period and improves the efficiency.
In order to solve the technical problems, the technical scheme adopted by the invention is as follows:
a method for automatically generating a black box test case comprises the following steps:
s1, the user inputs the data of the tested object according to the requirement;
s2, selecting a black box test case design method;
and S3, generating a black box test case.
Further, the data of the object to be measured includes a type of the object to be measured, an input of the object to be measured, and an input rule.
Further, the design method of the black box test case comprises an equivalence class division method, a boundary value analysis method, a judgment table method or an orthogonal test method.
Further, the equivalence class partitioning method requires that black box test cases are collections of things with the same attributes or methods.
Further, in the boundary value analysis method, a user finds out a boundary value of the black box test case, and selects the boundary value and a value adjacent to the boundary value.
Further, the judgment table method obtains a result through an exhaustion condition, and combines all black box test cases generated according to the exhaustion condition to obtain a policy table.
Further, the orthogonal test method is to find out a minority of black box test cases which replace the comprehensive black box test cases, and design the minority of black box test cases into a table.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the beneficial effects that: when the user uses the system, the idea of the system can be used for rapidly designing the black box test case, different tested objects are supported, and the efficiency is greatly improved in the software development life cycle.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of example 1.
Detailed Description
The invention will be further described with reference to the accompanying drawings. Embodiments of the present invention include, but are not limited to, the following examples.
Example 1
As shown in fig. 1, a method for automatically generating a black box test case includes the following steps:
s1, the user inputs the data of the tested object according to the requirement;
the data of the measured object comprises the type of the measured object, the input of the measured object and the input rule.
S2, selecting a black box test case design method;
the design method of the black box test case comprises an equivalence class division method, a boundary value analysis method, a judgment table method or an orthogonal test method, and specifically comprises the following steps:
the equivalence class division method requires that the black box test cases are object sets with the same attribute or method;
in the boundary value analysis method, a user finds out a boundary value of a black box test case, and selects the boundary value and a value adjacent to the boundary value;
the judgment table method obtains a result through an exhaustion condition, and combines all black box test cases generated according to the exhaustion condition to obtain a policy table;
the orthogonal test method is to find out a complete black box test case with a small number, and design the small number of black box test cases into a table.
And S3, generating a black box test case.
Example 2
The type of the tested object is a form, an equivalence class division method is adopted in the design of the black box test case, and the specific process is as follows:
s1, selecting the type of the tested object as a new added form by the user, wherein the input rule is as follows:
(1) a user name, any character within 5 bits and must be filled;
(2) cipher, English character within 12 bits and must be filled;
(3) and the industry pull-down option presets three options and is not required to be filled.
S2, selecting a black box test case design method as an equivalence class division method;
s3, generating a black box test case according to the following functions:
(1) checking an input range:
a. detecting an integer type;
b. the lower boundary value is less than or equal to the upper boundary value;
c. when incorrect, the input is prompted to be input again;
(2) an equivalence class division method is applied to divide the input range, and an effective interval and two ineffective intervals are returned;
(3) applying a random number generator to generate a specified number (input from a command line) of random values for each interval, noting that there are no repeated values in the returned values;
and S34, calling functions 1 to 3 by the main program to generate a black box test case.
Example 3
The type of the tested object is a form, a black box test case is designed by adopting a boundary value analysis method, and the specific process is as follows:
s1, selecting the type of the tested object as a new added form by the user, wherein the input rule is as follows:
(1) a user name, any character within 5 bits and must be filled;
(2) cipher, English character within 12 bits and must be filled;
(3) and the industry pull-down option presets three options and is not required to be filled.
S2, selecting a black box test case design method as a boundary value analysis method;
s3, generating a black box test case according to the following functions:
(1) checking an input range:
a. detecting an integer type;
b. the lower boundary value is less than or equal to the upper boundary value;
c. when incorrect, the input is prompted to be input again;
(2) applying a boundary value analysis method, removing boundary values of all the intervals, returning the boundary values, and paying attention to no repeated value in the returned boundary values;
(3) applying a random number generator to generate a specified number (input from a command line) of random values for each interval, noting that there are no repeated values in the returned values;
and S34, calling functions 1 to 3 by the main program to generate a black box test case.
The above is an embodiment of the present invention. The specific parameters in the above embodiments and examples are only for the purpose of clearly illustrating the invention verification process of the inventor and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the claims, and all equivalent structural changes made by using the contents of the specification and the drawings of the present invention should be covered by the scope of the present invention.
Claims (7)
1. A method for automatically generating a black box test case is characterized in that: comprises the following steps
S1, the user inputs the data of the tested object according to the requirement;
s2, selecting a black box test case design method;
and S3, generating a black box test case.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the method comprises: the data of the measured object comprises the type of the measured object, the input of the measured object and the input rule.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the method comprises: the design method of the black box test case comprises an equivalence class division method, a boundary value analysis method, a judgment table method or an orthogonal test method.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the method comprises: the equivalence class partitioning method requires that black box test cases be collections of things with the same attributes or methods.
5. The method of claim 3, wherein the method comprises: in the boundary value analysis method, a user finds out a boundary value of a black box test case, and selects the boundary value and a value adjacent to the boundary value.
6. The method of claim 3, wherein the method comprises: the judgment table method obtains results through exhaustion conditions, and combines all black box test cases generated according to the exhaustion conditions to obtain a policy table.
7. The method of claim 3, wherein the method comprises: the orthogonal test method is to find out a small number of black box test cases which replace the whole black box test cases, and design the small number of black box test cases into a table.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202011367528.4A CN112328500A (en) | 2020-11-27 | 2020-11-27 | Method for automatically generating black box test case |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202011367528.4A CN112328500A (en) | 2020-11-27 | 2020-11-27 | Method for automatically generating black box test case |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN112328500A true CN112328500A (en) | 2021-02-05 |
Family
ID=74309132
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202011367528.4A Pending CN112328500A (en) | 2020-11-27 | 2020-11-27 | Method for automatically generating black box test case |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN112328500A (en) |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101593145A (en) * | 2008-05-29 | 2009-12-02 | 福建升腾资讯有限公司 | Designing method of high-efficiency high-coverage-rate function test case |
| CN104346278A (en) * | 2014-09-28 | 2015-02-11 | 上海新炬网络技术有限公司 | Matrix-model-based software testing method |
| CN107844417A (en) * | 2017-10-20 | 2018-03-27 | 东软集团股份有限公司 | Method for generating test case and device |
-
2020
- 2020-11-27 CN CN202011367528.4A patent/CN112328500A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101593145A (en) * | 2008-05-29 | 2009-12-02 | 福建升腾资讯有限公司 | Designing method of high-efficiency high-coverage-rate function test case |
| CN104346278A (en) * | 2014-09-28 | 2015-02-11 | 上海新炬网络技术有限公司 | Matrix-model-based software testing method |
| CN107844417A (en) * | 2017-10-20 | 2018-03-27 | 东软集团股份有限公司 | Method for generating test case and device |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| 万映红主编, 西安交通大学出版社 * |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US20070094541A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for generating test execution sequences automatically for a software testing process | |
| CN110716870B (en) | Automatic service testing method and device | |
| CN112232006B (en) | Standard cell library verification method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN109933535A (en) | Generation method, device and the server of test case | |
| CN104346278A (en) | Matrix-model-based software testing method | |
| CN105335281A (en) | Method and device for automatic mock of external dependency | |
| CN105224458A (en) | A kind of database method of testing and system | |
| US6449750B1 (en) | Design verification device, method and memory media for integrated circuits | |
| CN111309581A (en) | Application performance detection method and device in database upgrading scene | |
| CN111475402B (en) | Program function testing method and related device | |
| US7024345B1 (en) | System and method for testing parameterized logic cores | |
| CN105279092A (en) | Software testing method and apparatus | |
| CN114416547A (en) | Test case based test method | |
| CN110597728A (en) | Method, device and system for constructing test data | |
| CN105447003B (en) | A kind of parameter sets generation method and equipment | |
| CN112328500A (en) | Method for automatically generating black box test case | |
| CN111475397A (en) | Method for batch test of form data by single submission | |
| CN110489349B (en) | JSON configuration file-based interface test method | |
| US11443092B2 (en) | Defect weight formulas for analog defect simulation | |
| CN114064469A (en) | Interface automation test method and storage medium | |
| CN106055468A (en) | Method and system for automatic testing of interface | |
| CN110795142A (en) | Configuration file generation method and device | |
| CN114924992B (en) | Formalized FPGA software security verification method and verification system | |
| CN110399298A (en) | A kind of test method and device | |
| CN111290938A (en) | Android semi-automatic testing method based on manual assistance |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20210205 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |