CN112214525A - Flight accident responsibility tracing method - Google Patents

Flight accident responsibility tracing method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN112214525A
CN112214525A CN202010971763.6A CN202010971763A CN112214525A CN 112214525 A CN112214525 A CN 112214525A CN 202010971763 A CN202010971763 A CN 202010971763A CN 112214525 A CN112214525 A CN 112214525A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
aircraft
airplane
data
flight
analysis result
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202010971763.6A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
翁健
胡舜
吴永东
邓慧杰
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Jinan University
University of Jinan
Original Assignee
Jinan University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Jinan University filed Critical Jinan University
Priority to CN202010971763.6A priority Critical patent/CN112214525A/en
Publication of CN112214525A publication Critical patent/CN112214525A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/24Querying
    • G06F16/245Query processing
    • G06F16/2458Special types of queries, e.g. statistical queries, fuzzy queries or distributed queries
    • G06F16/2471Distributed queries
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/27Replication, distribution or synchronisation of data between databases or within a distributed database system; Distributed database system architectures therefor
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/60Protecting data
    • G06F21/602Providing cryptographic facilities or services
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/60Protecting data
    • G06F21/64Protecting data integrity, e.g. using checksums, certificates or signatures
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20Design optimisation, verification or simulation
    • G06Q50/40

Abstract

The invention discloses a flight accident tracing method, which comprises the following steps: setting starting and stopping time points, calling accident aircraft flight information stored in the block chain system, and performing mechanical data analysis through a mechanical data analysis module to obtain a mechanical data analysis result; analyzing the ground control instruction in the time period through a control instruction analysis module according to the mechanical data analysis result to obtain a ground control instruction analysis result; analyzing the airplane operation instruction in the time period through an airplane operation instruction analysis module according to the ground control instruction analysis result to obtain an airplane operation instruction analysis result; comprehensively analyzing and judging accident responsibility according to the mechanical data analysis result, the ground control instruction analysis result and the airplane operation instruction analysis result; the invention can search the accident reason under the premise that the black box can not be found or the black box is damaged, and divide the accident responsibility, thereby having wide market prospect in the civil aviation field.

Description

Flight accident responsibility tracing method
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of research on flight safety, in particular to a flight accident tracing method.
Background
In recent years, aircraft flight accidents frequently occur, and serious threats are brought to the safety of flight groups and passengers. After a flight accident occurs, a government usually takes the lead to search for a black box, and determines the cause of the accident and a person in charge according to aircraft flight data and cockpit recording data stored in the black box. The effective premise of the method is that a black box of the airplane can be found. However, most flight accidents occur at sea, and the black box is difficult to find and salvage. For flight accidents for which no black box is found, an effective method is not available for accident reason judgment and responsibility division. To avoid this, ACARS has been proposed by the relevant personnel. The flight data is transmitted periodically to a ground station. However, this approach only allows for flight data storage and does not allow for storage of control commands and safety issues. For human-induced flight accidents, the division of responsibility between pilots and ground commanders becomes particularly important. Under the existing mechanism, the ground station has no effective way to safely store the control instruction issued by the ground commander. Therefore, after the aircraft accident happens, the ground commander who issues the wrong control instruction can repudiate the personal behavior, and further serious influence is brought to the division and responsibility pursuit of the aircraft accident responsibility.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to overcome the defects in the prior art, provides a flight accident responsibility tracing method, and solves the problems that after an existing flight accident occurs, under the condition that a black box cannot be found, the reason of the accident cannot be clarified, and the responsibility tracing cannot be effectively carried out on relevant personnel such as pilots, ground commanders, airplane manufacturers and airplane maintenance personnel.
The purpose of the invention is realized by the following technical scheme:
a flight accident tracing method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
setting starting and stopping time points, calling accident aircraft flight information stored in the block chain system, and performing mechanical data analysis through a mechanical data analysis module to obtain a mechanical data analysis result;
analyzing the ground control instruction in the time period through a control instruction analysis module according to the mechanical data analysis result to obtain a ground control instruction analysis result;
analyzing the airplane operation instruction in the time period through an airplane operation instruction analysis module according to the ground control instruction analysis result to obtain an airplane operation instruction analysis result;
and comprehensively analyzing and judging the responsibility of the accident according to the mechanical data analysis result, the ground control instruction analysis result and the airplane operation instruction analysis result.
Further, the setting of the start-stop time point calls the flight information of the accident aircraft stored in the block chain system and performs mechanical data analysis through a mechanical data analysis module, specifically: according to the set starting and stopping time points, summarizing all flight information of the accident aircraft stored in the block chain system in the period of time, extracting mechanical data in the flight information, sequencing according to time, judging whether the mechanical data contain fault codes or not, and if the fault codes exist in the mechanical data at a certain moment, judging that the accident is caused by mechanical failure of the aircraft.
Further, the flight information includes: control commands, aircraft flight data, aircraft mechanical data.
Further, according to the mechanical data analysis result, the control instruction analysis module analyzes the ground control instruction in the time period to obtain a ground control instruction analysis result, and specifically comprises: if the fault code exists in the airplane mechanical data at a certain moment, judging whether a control instruction provided for the fault is correct or not, and determining accident responsibility; and if the fault code does not exist in the aircraft mechanical data, performing the next judgment.
Further, the judging whether the control instruction provided for the fault is correct or not and determining accident responsibility specifically includes: determining a fault code time point, summarizing all airplane flight data and control instructions after the time point, sequencing the control instructions according to time, establishing an airplane real-time model by taking three types of data, namely airplane parameters, airplane real-time flight data at the time point and mechanical real-time data at the time point as parameters, inputting the sequenced control instructions into a system model one by one, performing flight simulation, judging whether the control instructions issued by ground commanders are correct according to simulation results, and if so, taking corresponding responsibility by pilots, airplane manufacturers and airplane maintenance personnel; if the position is incorrect, the ground commander, the aircraft manufacturer and the aircraft maintenance personnel need to take corresponding responsibility.
Further, according to the ground control instruction analysis result, the aircraft operation instruction in the time period is analyzed by the aircraft operation instruction analysis module to obtain an aircraft operation instruction analysis result, which specifically comprises: acquiring external environment data of the aircraft flying in the time period, establishing an aircraft real-time model by using three types of data of the aircraft parameters, the aircraft real-time flying data at the starting time point and the external environment real-time data at the starting time point as parameters, sequencing control instructions according to time, receiving time points according to the control instructions as nodes, segmenting the whole flying range, performing aircraft flying simulation segment by segment and comparing with actual flying information, if all the segments are the same, the ground commander needs to bear corresponding responsibility, and if the segments are different, the pilot needs to bear corresponding responsibility.
Further, the block chain system comprises an airplane node and a ground station node, and is responsible for storing control instructions, airplane flight data and airplane mechanical data; the airplane node is responsible for periodically storing airplane mechanical data and airplane flight data in the block chain system, and the ground station node is responsible for storing airplane control instructions in the block chain system.
Further, the airplane mechanical data is periodically recorded in an airplane node by an airplane, specifically, the airplane mechanical data is data information of whether an airplane mechanical fault exists in the airplane flying process, if the airplane mechanical fault does not exist, 0 is displayed, and if the airplane mechanical data exists, a fault code is displayed.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the following advantages and beneficial effects:
the method can find the accident reason under the condition that the black box cannot be found, and further realizes the division of the accident responsibility related to pilots, ground commanders, airplane manufacturers and airplane maintenance personnel by utilizing the distributed and non-falsification characteristics of the block chain technology.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method for following a flight accident according to the present invention.
Detailed Description
The present invention will be described in further detail with reference to examples and drawings, but the present invention is not limited thereto.
Example (b):
a method for following up a flight accident, as shown in fig. 1, comprising the following steps:
setting starting and stopping time points, calling accident aircraft flight information stored in the block chain system, and performing mechanical data analysis through a mechanical data analysis module to obtain a mechanical data analysis result;
analyzing the ground control instruction in the time period through a control instruction analysis module according to the mechanical data analysis result to obtain a ground control instruction analysis result;
analyzing the airplane operation instruction in the time period through an airplane operation instruction analysis module according to the ground control instruction analysis result to obtain an airplane operation instruction analysis result;
and comprehensively analyzing and judging the responsibility of the accident according to the mechanical data analysis result, the ground control instruction analysis result and the airplane operation instruction analysis result.
The method comprises the following specific steps:
after a flight accident occurs, an accident investigation team searches accident causes and defines accident-related responsible persons, including ground commanders, pilots, airplane manufacturers and airplane maintenance personnel;
searching a block chain system according to the serial number and the starting and stopping time points of the trouble-related aircraft, and inquiring all control instructions, flight data and mechanical data received by the trouble-related aircraft in the time period;
and judging and distinguishing accident responsibilities according to the related information, and confirming the responsible person.
The airplane number is an airplane registration number and uniquely represents an airplane identity;
the starting and stopping time points are set by an accident panel according to experience;
the accident responsibility is divided according to the related information, and the specific flow of confirming the responsible person is as follows:
the method comprises the following steps: summarizing all control instructions, flight data and mechanical data of the aircraft involved in the block chain system in the time period according to the set starting and stopping time points;
step two: sorting the mechanical data according to time, sequentially judging whether fault codes are contained or not, if the fault codes are contained, executing a third step, and if the fault codes are not contained, executing a sixth step;
step three: if the mechanical data at a certain moment has a fault code, summarizing all the airplane flight data and control instructions after the time point again, sequencing the control instructions according to time, establishing an airplane real-time model by taking three types of data, namely airplane parameters, airplane real-time flight data at the time point and mechanical real-time data at the time point as parameters, recording the sequenced control instructions into a system model one by one, carrying out flight simulation, judging whether the control instructions issued by ground commanders are correct or not according to a simulation result, and if so, executing a fourth step; if not, executing the step five;
step four: the pilot operates the airplane without a control command given by a ground commander to cause the accident, and needs to bear corresponding responsibility of the accident, and meanwhile, an airplane manufacturer and airplane maintenance personnel need to bear corresponding responsibility;
step five: the ground commander issues an error instruction to the pilot according to the fault encountered by the airplane, and needs to bear the corresponding responsibility of the accident, and meanwhile, the airplane manufacturer and the airplane maintenance personnel need to bear the corresponding responsibility;
step six: acquiring external environment data of the aircraft flying in the time period, establishing an aircraft real-time model by using three types of data of the aircraft parameters, the aircraft real-time flying information at the starting time point and the external environment real-time data at the starting time point as parameters, sequencing control instructions according to time, receiving time points according to the control instructions as nodes to segment the whole flying range, performing aircraft flying simulation section by section and comparing the simulation with actual flying information, and executing the seventh step if all the sections are the same, and executing the eighth step if the sections are different;
step seven: the ground commander issues an error instruction to the pilot and needs to undertake the corresponding responsibility of the accident;
step eight: the pilot operates the airplane without a control command given by a ground commander to cause the accident, and needs to undertake the corresponding responsibility of the accident;
the parameters of the airplane self refer to various factory parameters of the airplane and are provided by the airplane manufacturer.
The flight data refers to longitude, latitude, altitude, horizontal speed, vertical speed and azimuth angle data of the flight of the airplane.
The aircraft flight external environment data comprises information such as meteorological data, airspace busy data and control areas.
The block chain system comprises an airplane node and a ground station node, and is responsible for storing airplane control instructions, flight data and mechanical data, wherein the airplane node is responsible for periodically storing the mechanical data and the flight data in the block chain system, and the ground station node is responsible for storing the airplane control instructions in the block chain system.
The mechanical data is periodically recorded in a block chain node on the airplane by the airplane, specifically, whether mechanical fault information exists in the airplane flying process or not is indicated, if no fault exists, 0 is displayed, and if a fault exists, a fault code is displayed. The fault codes correspond to specific fault contents, and are agreed and regulated in advance by the civil aviation administration and the aircraft manufacturers.
The control command comprises a name of a ground commander, command issuing time, an airplane number and specific command content, the control command is issued by the ground commander of the ground station, and the ground commander encrypts the control command by using a private key of the ground commander and stores the encrypted control command in the block chain system.
The above embodiments are preferred embodiments of the present invention, but the present invention is not limited to the above embodiments, and any other changes, modifications, substitutions, combinations, and simplifications which do not depart from the spirit and principle of the present invention should be construed as equivalents thereof, and all such changes, modifications, substitutions, combinations, and simplifications are intended to be included in the scope of the present invention.

Claims (8)

1. A flight accident tracing method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
setting starting and stopping time points, calling accident aircraft flight information stored in the block chain system, and performing mechanical data analysis through a mechanical data analysis module to obtain a mechanical data analysis result;
analyzing the ground control instruction in the time period through a control instruction analysis module according to the mechanical data analysis result to obtain a ground control instruction analysis result;
analyzing the airplane operation instruction in the time period through an airplane operation instruction analysis module according to the ground control instruction analysis result to obtain an airplane operation instruction analysis result;
and comprehensively analyzing and judging the responsibility of the accident according to the mechanical data analysis result, the ground control instruction analysis result and the airplane operation instruction analysis result.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the start-stop time point is set, the flight information of the accident aircraft stored in the block chain system is retrieved, and the mechanical data analysis module is used to analyze the mechanical data, specifically: according to the set starting and stopping time points, summarizing all flight information of the accident aircraft stored in the block chain system in the period of time, extracting mechanical data in the flight information, sequencing according to time, judging whether the mechanical data contain fault codes or not, and if the fault codes exist in the mechanical data at a certain moment, judging that the accident is caused by mechanical failure of the aircraft.
3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the flight information includes: control commands, aircraft flight data, aircraft mechanical data.
4. A flight accident responsibility-following method according to claim 3, wherein the control instruction analysis module analyzes the ground control instruction in the time slot according to the mechanical data analysis result to obtain a ground control instruction analysis result, specifically: if the fault code exists in the airplane mechanical data at a certain moment, judging whether a control instruction provided for the fault is correct or not, and determining accident responsibility; and if the fault code does not exist in the aircraft mechanical data, performing the next judgment.
5. A flight accident responsibility method according to claim 4, wherein the judging step is to judge whether the control command for the fault is correct and to define accident responsibility, and the judging step comprises the following steps: determining a fault code time point, summarizing all airplane flight data and control instructions after the time point, sequencing the control instructions according to time, establishing an airplane real-time model by taking three types of data, namely airplane parameters, airplane real-time flight data at the time point and mechanical real-time data at the time point as parameters, inputting the sequenced control instructions into a system model one by one, performing flight simulation, judging whether the control instructions issued by ground commanders are correct according to simulation results, and if so, taking corresponding responsibility by pilots, airplane manufacturers and airplane maintenance personnel; if the position is incorrect, the ground commander, the aircraft manufacturer and the aircraft maintenance personnel need to take corresponding responsibility.
6. A flight accident responsibility-following method according to claim 1, wherein the aircraft operation instruction analysis result is obtained by analyzing the aircraft operation instruction in the time slot through an aircraft operation instruction analysis module according to the ground control instruction analysis result, and specifically comprises: acquiring external environment data of the aircraft flying in the time period, establishing an aircraft real-time model by using three types of data of the aircraft parameters, the aircraft real-time flying data at the starting time point and the external environment real-time data at the starting time point as parameters, sequencing control instructions according to time, receiving time points according to the control instructions as nodes, segmenting the whole flying range, performing aircraft flying simulation segment by segment and comparing with actual flying information, if all the segments are the same, the ground commander needs to bear corresponding responsibility, and if the segments are different, the pilot needs to bear corresponding responsibility.
7. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the block chain system comprises an aircraft node and a ground station node, and is responsible for storing control commands, aircraft flight data, and aircraft mechanical data; the airplane node is responsible for periodically storing airplane mechanical data and airplane flight data in the block chain system, and the ground station node is responsible for storing airplane control instructions in the block chain system.
8. A flight accident responsibility method according to claim 7, wherein the aircraft mechanical data is periodically recorded in an aircraft node by the aircraft, specifically, the data information indicating whether there is an aircraft mechanical fault in the aircraft flight process, if there is no fault, 0 is displayed, and if there is a fault, a fault code is displayed.
CN202010971763.6A 2020-09-16 2020-09-16 Flight accident responsibility tracing method Pending CN112214525A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010971763.6A CN112214525A (en) 2020-09-16 2020-09-16 Flight accident responsibility tracing method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010971763.6A CN112214525A (en) 2020-09-16 2020-09-16 Flight accident responsibility tracing method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN112214525A true CN112214525A (en) 2021-01-12

Family

ID=74049584

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202010971763.6A Pending CN112214525A (en) 2020-09-16 2020-09-16 Flight accident responsibility tracing method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN112214525A (en)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107094148A (en) * 2017-05-09 2017-08-25 电子科技大学 A kind of unmanned plane block chain management and control strategy of resisting quantum computation attack
WO2019086821A1 (en) * 2017-10-31 2019-05-09 Sita Information Networking Computing Uk Limited System and method for monitoring unmanned aircraft
CN111063056A (en) * 2019-11-21 2020-04-24 中国电子产品可靠性与环境试验研究所((工业和信息化部电子第五研究所)(中国赛宝实验室)) Aviation accident analysis method and device, computer equipment and storage medium

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107094148A (en) * 2017-05-09 2017-08-25 电子科技大学 A kind of unmanned plane block chain management and control strategy of resisting quantum computation attack
WO2019086821A1 (en) * 2017-10-31 2019-05-09 Sita Information Networking Computing Uk Limited System and method for monitoring unmanned aircraft
CN111063056A (en) * 2019-11-21 2020-04-24 中国电子产品可靠性与环境试验研究所((工业和信息化部电子第五研究所)(中国赛宝实验室)) Aviation accident analysis method and device, computer equipment and storage medium

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN110723303B (en) Method, device, equipment, storage medium and system for assisting decision
US20110246002A1 (en) Systems and methods for aircraft flight tracking and analysis
CA2936382C (en) A computer-implemented method and system for setting up an air traffic simulator
CN105955301A (en) Ground-station-based real-time control method for flight of unmanned aerial vehicle
CN108122434A (en) A kind of flight monitoring method and device
CN111627257B (en) Control instruction safety rehearsal and verification method based on aircraft motion trend prejudgment
CN113962420A (en) Prediction method of aircraft fuel consumption, computing equipment and storage medium
CN107782334B (en) Test flight method for required navigation performance
Gillet et al. Enhancement in realism of ATC simulations by improving aircraft behaviour models
CN112214525A (en) Flight accident responsibility tracing method
CN109712434A (en) A kind of unmanned plane air situation display method for early warning
US11249489B2 (en) Method for determining a vertical path of an aircraft from its current position, associated computer program product and determining system
CN110844092A (en) Aircraft fault warning method and system
CN113391649B (en) Unmanned aerial vehicle display and control integrated method, system and device and computer readable storage medium
Christmann et al. Recent encounters of aircraft with volcanic ash clouds
CN117311396B (en) Flight monitoring method, device, equipment and medium
Rakas et al. Deterministic models for degraded airside capacity and delays
US20230026962A1 (en) Method for validating a terrain database
CN117294705B (en) Data exchange system and method for sub-orbit aircraft and SWIM system
CN116562637B (en) Flight change operation decision method, system, device and storage medium
CN115359686B (en) Instrument landing system signal analysis and diagnosis method and device and electronic equipment
Bell Developing standards for time-based sequencing & separation of aircraft
Hughes Machine Vision
Tadjdeh New Tool to Assist Acquisition Workforce
Zahn FT-06-Advanced Air Mobility Operation & Automation: National Campaign Simulation Activity with Joby Aviation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination