CN112181791A

CN112181791A - System performance determination method, device, terminal and storage medium

Info

Publication number: CN112181791A
Application number: CN202010984730.5A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 甄文先
Original assignee: Oppo Chongqing Intelligent Technology Co Ltd
Current assignee: Oppo Chongqing Intelligent Technology Co Ltd
Priority date: 2020-09-18
Filing date: 2020-09-18
Publication date: 2021-01-05

Abstract

The present application belongs to the field of communications technologies, and in particular, to a method, an apparatus, a terminal, and a storage medium for determining system performance. The system performance determination method comprises the following steps: acquiring a first batch of users using a first system version and a second batch of users using a second system version, wherein the second system version is a system version upgraded from the first system version; acquiring first batch users of the first batch users and the second batch users; determining a system performance of the second system version based on the first peer user. According to the embodiment of the application, the system performance of the first batch users in the first system version can be compared with the system performance of the first batch users in the second system version, the system performance of the second system version is determined, the situation that the system performance of the second system version is determined directly based on the second batch users is reduced, and the accuracy of determining the system performance can be improved.

Description

System performance determination method, device, terminal and storage medium

Technical Field

The present application belongs to the field of communications technologies, and in particular, to a method, an apparatus, a terminal, and a storage medium for determining system performance.

Background

Over time, the user may upgrade the system, which may be, for example, adjusted parameter settings, in order to operate the system more efficiently. With the development of scientific technology, the upgrading period of the system is shorter and shorter. When the system is upgraded, a user can upgrade the system based on the upgrade reminding information of the terminal, and can also regularly detect whether the system has an upgrade version, and if so, the system can be upgraded.

Disclosure of Invention

The embodiment of the application provides a method, a device, a terminal and a storage medium for determining system performance, which can improve the accuracy of determining the system performance. The technical scheme comprises the following steps:

in a first aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a method for determining system performance, where the method includes:

acquiring a first batch of users using a first system version and a second batch of users using a second system version, wherein the second system version is a system version upgraded from the first system version;

acquiring first batch users of the first batch users and the second batch users;

determining a system performance of the second system version based on the first peer user.

In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a system performance determining apparatus, where the apparatus includes:

the system comprises a user acquisition unit, a first user acquisition unit and a second user acquisition unit, wherein the user acquisition unit is used for acquiring a first batch of users using a first system version and a second batch of users using a second system version, and the second system version is a system version upgraded from the first system version;

the same batch user acquisition unit is used for acquiring a first same batch user of the first batch of users and the second batch of users;

and the performance determining unit is used for determining the system performance of the second system version based on the first batch users.

In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a system, including a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, where the processor implements the method of any one of the above first aspects when executing the computer program.

In a fourth aspect, the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, and the computer program is used for implementing any one of the methods described above when executed by a processor.

In a fifth aspect, embodiments of the present application provide a computer program product, where the computer program product includes a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program, where the computer program is operable to cause a computer to perform some or all of the steps as described in the first aspect of embodiments of the present application. The computer program product may be a software installation package.

The embodiment of the application provides a system performance determining method, and the system performance of a second system version can be determined based on first users of the first system version and second users of the second system version by obtaining the first users of the first system version and the second users of the second system version, so that the system performance of the first users of the first system version and the system performance of the first users of the second system version can be compared, the system performance of the second system version is determined, the situation that the system performance of the second system version is determined directly based on the second users is reduced, the accuracy of obtaining and determining system performance data can be improved, and the accuracy of determining the system performance can be further improved.

Drawings

In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present application or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly described below, it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present application, and for those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained according to the drawings without creative efforts.

Fig. 1 is a schematic view illustrating an application scenario of a system performance determination method or a system performance determination apparatus according to an embodiment of the present application;

fig. 2 is a schematic flow chart illustrating a system performance determination method according to an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of a terminal interface according to an embodiment of the present application;

fig. 4 is a schematic flow chart illustrating a system performance determination method according to an embodiment of the present application;

fig. 5 is a schematic flow chart illustrating a system performance determination method according to an embodiment of the present application;

fig. 6 is a flowchart illustrating a user acquisition method according to an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 7 is a flow chart illustrating a system performance determination method according to an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 8 is a flow chart illustrating a method for determining system performance according to an embodiment of the present application;

fig. 9 is a schematic flow chart illustrating a system performance determination method according to an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram illustrating an upgrade time point of a system version of an embodiment of the present application;

fig. 11 is a schematic structural diagram of a system performance determination apparatus according to an embodiment of the present application;

fig. 12 shows a schematic structural diagram of a terminal according to an embodiment of the present application.

Detailed Description

In order to make the technical solutions better understood by those skilled in the art, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present application, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present application, and not all embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present application.

With the development of scientific technology, the upgrading of the terminal system aims to improve the use experience of users. After the terminal system is upgraded, the data of the upgraded system version can be obtained, and the upgraded system performance is determined. For example, an Exception Analysis Platform (EAP) may perform application Exception Analysis for a terminal that has been used.

According to some embodiments, fig. 1 illustrates an application scenario diagram of a system performance determination method or a system performance determination apparatus applied to the embodiments of the present application. As shown in fig. 1, in order to make the system operate more efficiently, the system may be upgraded, but it is not possible to determine whether the upgraded system is performing an optimization operation on the last system version. Therefore, when determining the system performance, the system performance determining device may obtain, through the server, performance data of the current system version of all the user terminals of one model, and based on the performance data, may determine the system performance of the current system version. However, determining the system performance based on only one system version can only determine the system performance of the system version, and cannot determine whether the system performance of the current system version is optimized or deteriorated when upgrading from the last system version to the current system version, and thus determining the system performance based on only the current system version is inaccurate.

It is easy to understand that the users using the terminal include a light load user and a heavy load user, the light load user refers to a user who uses the terminal less frequently or uses a smaller application program, and the heavy load user refers to a user who uses the terminal frequently or uses a higher power consumption application program. For the endurance time in the system performance, the endurance time of the light-load user is longer, and the endurance time of the heavy-load user is shorter. When the endurance time of the current version is determined, all users of the current system version can be acquired first, and the endurance time of each user is acquired. When the duration of each user is obtained, the sum of the durations of all users of the current system version may be obtained. Based on the number of all users of the current system version, the average duration of the duration of all users of the current system version can be calculated, and based on the average duration, the system performance of the current system version can be determined. However, the change of the endurance time before and after the system upgrade cannot be determined based on the average endurance time of the endurance time of all users of the current system version, so that the determination of the system performance is inaccurate. The method for determining the system performance can improve the accuracy of determining the system performance.

The system performance determination method provided by the embodiment of the present application will be described in detail below with reference to fig. 2 to fig. 10. The execution subject of the embodiment of the present application includes, but is not limited to, a terminal, a server, or a system performance determination device. The execution bodies of the embodiments shown in fig. 2-10 may be, for example, system performance determination devices.

Referring to fig. 2, a flow chart of a system performance determining method is provided in the embodiment of the present application. As shown in fig. 2, the method of the embodiment of the present application may include the following steps S101 to S103.

S101, acquiring a first batch of users using a first system version and a second batch of users using a second system version, wherein the second system version is a system version upgraded from the first system version.

According to some embodiments, the first system version refers to a certain one of the system versions, and does not refer specifically to a certain fixed version, but the first system version does not refer to the last one of the system versions. For example, when the system versions include version a, version S, version D, version F, and version G, the first system version may be version a, for example, and the first system version may also be version F, for example.

It is easy to understand that the second system version refers to a certain system version in the system versions, and does not refer to a certain fixed version in particular, but the second system version does not refer to the first system version in the system versions, and the second system version is a system version after the first system version is upgraded. For example, when the system versions include version a, version S, version D, version F, and version G, the second system version may be version S, for example, and the first system version may also be version G, for example.

Optionally, the first group of users refers to users using the first system version, and does not refer to a certain group of fixed users specifically, for example, when the first system version changes, the first group of users also changes accordingly. The second group of users refers to users using the second system version, and does not refer to a certain group of fixed users specifically, for example, when the second system version changes, the second group of users also changes accordingly. The first batch of users comprises at least one user, and the second batch of users comprises at least one user.

According to some embodiments, when the system version is upgraded to the second system version using all of the first users of the first system version, and the second system version has no incremental users, the first users may be the same as the second users. When the first users using the first system version do not upgrade the system version to the second system version and the second system version has no incremental users, the second users can be part of the first users. When the first users using the first system version do not upgrade the system version to the second system version and the second system version has incremental users, the second users may include users who are not available in the first users, that is, the second users include the incremental users and some users of the first users.

According to some embodiments, the system performance determination device may, for example, receive system performance determination instructions including, but not limited to, voice determination instructions, text determination instructions, click determination instructions, and the like, before the system performance determination device obtains a first set of users using the first system version and a second set of users using the second system version. When the system performance determination device receives the system performance determination instruction, the system performance determination device may acquire a first group of users using the first system version and a second group of users using the second system version. The first users acquired by the system performance determination apparatus may be, for example, a1 users, a2 users, a3 users, a4 users, a5 users, a6 users, a7 users, a8 users, a9 users, a10 users, a11 users, a12 users, a13 users, a14 users, a15 users, a16 users, a17 users, a18 users, a19 users, and a20 users. The second group of users acquired by the system performance determination apparatus may be, for example, a21 users, a22 users, a23 users, a24 users, a25 users, a26 users, a27 users, a28 users, a29 users, a10 users, a11 users, a12 users, a13 users, a14 users, a15 users, a16 users, a17 users, a18 users, a19 users, and a20 users.

It is easily understood that the system performance determining apparatus may acquire the first users using the first system version and the second users using the second system version when the system upgrade is detected, that is, the system is upgraded from the first system version to the second system version.

S102, first batch users of the first batch users and second batch users are obtained.

According to some embodiments, the first co-batched user refers to a user that uses both the first system version and the second system version. The first batch of users does not refer to a certain batch of fixed users, for example, when the version of the first system or the version of the second system changes, the first batch of users also changes correspondingly.

It is to be readily understood that, when the system performance determination apparatus acquires the first group of users using the first system version and the second group of users using the second system version, the system performance determination apparatus may acquire the first batch of users of the first group of users and the second group of users based on the first group of users and the second group of users. For example, the first users acquired by the system performance determination apparatus may be a1 user, a2 user, a3 user, a4 user, a5 user, a6 user, a7 user, a8 user, a9 user, a10 user, a11 user, a12 user, a13 user, a14 user, a15 user, a16 user, a17 user, a18 user, a19 user, and a20 user. The second group of users acquired by the system performance determination apparatus may be, for example, a21 users, a22 users, a23 users, a24 users, a25 users, a26 users, a27 users, a28 users, a29 users, a10 users, a11 users, a12 users, a13 users, a14 users, a15 users, a16 users, a17 users, a18 users, a19 users, and a20 users. The first batch of users of the first batch of users and the second batch of users acquired by the system performance determination apparatus may be, for example, a10 user, a11 user, a12 user, a13 user, a14 user, a15 user, a16 user, a17 user, a18 user, a19 user, and a20 user.

S103, determining the system performance of the second system version based on the first batch users.

According to some embodiments, when the system performance determination apparatus acquires the first batched users of the first batched users and the second batched users, the system performance determination apparatus may acquire system performance data of the first batched users in the first system version and system performance data of the first batched users in the second system version. Based on the system performance data, the system performance determining means may determine the system performance of the second system version. The system performance includes, but is not limited to, duration, frequency of system failures, number of system auto-starts, and the like.

It is easy to understand that the first homogeneous users acquired by the system performance determining apparatus may be, for example, a10 user, a11 user, a12 user, a13 user, a14 user, a15 user, a16 user, a17 user, a18 user, a19 user, and a20 user. The system performance determination means may acquire an average system failure frequency of the first peer user under the first system version and an average system failure frequency of the first peer user under the second system version, and based on the average system failure frequency, the system performance determination means may determine the system performance of the second system version. The system performance determination device may determine that the system performance of the second system version is optimized because the system performance determination device obtains that the average system failure frequency of the first peer user in the first system version may be, for example, 1 time/week and the average system failure frequency of the first peer user in the second system version is 1 time/month.

Optionally, when the system performance determining apparatus determines that the system performance of the second system version is better than that of the first system version, the system performance determining apparatus may send a prompt message to the second group of users, so that the second group of users can clearly know the system performance status of the current system version. At this time, an example interface of the terminal of the second system user may be as shown in fig. 3.

The embodiment of the application provides a system performance determination method, which can determine the system performance of a second system version based on a first co-batch user of a first batch of users using the first system version and a first co-batch user of a second batch of users using the second system version, and can determine the system performance of the second system version based on performance data of the first co-batch user before and after the system version is upgraded, i.e. the system performance of the first co-batch user in the first system version and the system performance of the first co-batch user in the second system version can be compared, the system performance of the second system version is determined, the situation that the system performance of the second system version is determined directly based on the second batch of users is reduced, the inaccuracy of system performance determination is reduced, the accuracy of obtaining and determining the system performance data can be improved, and the accuracy of system performance determination can be further improved.

Referring to fig. 4, a flow chart of a system performance determining method is provided in the embodiment of the present application. As shown in fig. 4, the method of the embodiment of the present application may include the following steps S201 to S204.

S201, acquiring a first batch of users using a first system version and a second batch of users using a second system version, wherein the second system version is the version upgraded from the first system version.

The specific process is as described above, and is not described herein again.

According to some embodiments, please refer to fig. 5, which provides a schematic flow chart of a system performance determination method according to an embodiment of the present application. As shown in fig. 5, the method of the embodiment of the present application may include the following steps S301 to S302 when acquiring a second group of users using a second system version. S301, upgrading a first system version of the system to obtain a second system version of the system; s302, when the change quantity of the users using the second system version in the preset time length is smaller than a preset change quantity threshold value, a second batch of users using the second system version is obtained.

It is easy to understand that, when the system performance determination apparatus determines that the current system version is the first system version, the system performance determination apparatus may obtain the first users of the first system version within the first preset time period. Within the first preset time length, the change quantity of the first group of users is smaller than a preset change quantity threshold value. When the system performance determination device detects that the user sends an upgrade instruction for the current system version, the system performance determination device may upgrade the current system version to obtain the second system version, that is, the system performance determination device may upgrade the first system version of the system to obtain the second system version of the system. When the system performance determining apparatus may upgrade the current system version, an Over The Air (OTA) technique may be used to upgrade the current system version. The system performance determination device may obtain a second set of users of the second system version within a second preset time period based on the second system version.

Optionally, when acquiring the second group of users, the system performance determining apparatus may detect whether the number of changes of the users using the second system version within the preset time period is smaller than a preset change number threshold. When the change number of the users using the second system version within the preset time period by the system performance determination device is smaller than the preset change number threshold, the system performance determination device may acquire a second batch of users using the second system version. For example, when the system performance determination device detects that the number of changes of the users using the second system version in a day is less than a preset change number threshold, the system performance determination device may acquire the second group of users. The system performance determination means may also acquire the second group of users when, for example, it is detected that the number of changes of the users using the second system version within three consecutive days is less than a preset change number threshold. The system performance determination device detects the change number of the users using the second system version, so that the second batch of users can be acquired when the change number of the users using the second system version is small, and the acquisition accuracy of the users in the same batch can be improved.

According to some embodiments, fig. 6 shows a flowchart of a user acquisition method according to an embodiment of the present application. As shown in fig. 6, the first preset time period determined by the system performance determining device may be, for example, 2019.04.19-2019.04.26, the second preset time period may be, for example, 2019.05.04-2019.05.06, and the third preset time period may be, for example, 2019.04.27-2019.05.03. The system performance determination device may acquire 2019.04.19-2019.04.26 a first group of users and 2019.05.04-2019.05.06 a second group of users.

S202, determining a first batch of users of the system based on the first batch of users and the second batch of users.

The specific process is as described above, and is not described herein again.

Referring to fig. 7, a flow chart of a system performance determination method according to some embodiments is provided. As shown in fig. 7, the method of the embodiment of the present application, based on the first batch of users and the second batch of users, determining the first batch of users of the system may include the following steps S401 to S403. S401, acquiring first terminal identification numbers corresponding to a first group of users respectively and second terminal identification numbers corresponding to a second group of users respectively; s402, acquiring a terminal identification number intersection of the first terminal identification number and the second terminal identification number; s403, determining the user corresponding to at least one terminal identification number in the terminal identification number collection as a first batch user.

It is easy to understand that the terminal identification number (IMEI) is an abbreviation of the International Mobile Equipment Identity code and is an International Mobile Equipment identification code, the terminal identification number may be an "electronic serial number" composed of 15 digits, the terminal identification number corresponds to the terminal one by one, that is, one terminal corresponds to one terminal identification number, and the terminal identification number has uniqueness.

Optionally, when the system performance determining device determines the first users of the system based on the first users and the second users, the system performance determining device may obtain the first terminal identification numbers corresponding to the first users and the second terminal identification numbers corresponding to the second users. When the system performance determination device obtains the first terminal identification numbers corresponding to the first group of users and the second terminal identification numbers corresponding to the second group of users, the system performance determination device may obtain the intersection of the terminal identification numbers of the first terminal identification number and the second terminal identification number by using an intersection algorithm. The system performance determination device may determine a user corresponding to at least one terminal identification number in the terminal identification number collection as a first peer user.

According to some embodiments, at least one of the terminal identification numbers in the intersection of terminal identification numbers is 254655125421546, 512468924445518, 512468924445519, and 512468924445517, respectively. The system performance determining means may determine Q1 user corresponding to 254655125421546, Q2 user corresponding to 512468924445518, Q3 user corresponding to 512468924445519, and Q4 user corresponding to 512468924445517 as the first batch of users.

According to some embodiments, please refer to fig. 8, which provides a flowchart of a system performance determining method according to an embodiment of the present application. As shown in fig. 8, the method of the embodiment of the present application, based on the first batch of users and the second batch of users, determining the first batch of users of the system may include the following steps S501 to S502. S501, acquiring a first upgrading time point of a first system version and a second upgrading time point of a second system version; s502, when the time interval between the first upgrading time point and the second upgrading time point is smaller than the preset time interval, determining the first batch users of the system based on the first batch users and the second batch users.

It is easily understood that, due to the time limit of storing data on the server, the system performance determination apparatus may acquire a first upgrade time point of the first system version and a second upgrade time point of the second system version when determining the first peer user of the system based on the first and second users. When the system performance determination device acquires a first upgrade time point of the first system version and a second upgrade time point of the second system version, the system performance determination device may detect whether a time interval between the first upgrade time point and the second upgrade time point is smaller than a preset time interval. The preset time interval is less than or equal to the time for storing data on the server. When the system performance determination device determines that the time interval between the first upgrade time point and the second upgrade time point is smaller than the preset time interval, the system performance determination device may determine the first batch of users of the system based on the first batch of users and the second batch of users, may improve the accuracy of obtaining the first batch of users, and may further improve the accuracy of determining the system performance.

Alternatively, the preset time interval may be, for example, 50 days, and the first upgrade time point of the first system version acquired by the system performance determination apparatus may be, for example, 2020.01.02, and the second upgrade time point of the second system version may be, for example, 2020.02.05. When the system performance determination means determines that the time interval 33 days of the first upgrade time point 2020.01.02 and the second upgrade time point 2020.02.05 is less than the preset time interval 50 days, the system performance determination means may determine the first fellow users of the system based on the first group of users and the second group of users.

Referring to fig. 9, a flow chart of a system performance determination method according to some embodiments is provided. As shown in fig. 9, the method of the embodiment of the present application may further include the following steps S601 to S606. S601, acquiring a first upgrading time point of a first system version and a second upgrading time point of a second system version; s602, when the time interval between the first upgrading time point and the second upgrading time point is greater than the preset time interval, acquiring a third batch of users of a third system version, wherein the third system version is a system version behind the first system version and before the second system version, and the time interval between the third upgrading time point and the second upgrading time point of the third system version is less than the preset time interval; s603, detecting whether the third batch of users have incremental users; s604, when detecting that the third batch of users have no incremental users, determining second same batch of users of the system based on the second batch of users and the third batch of users; s605, when detecting that the third batch of users have the incremental users, determining the incremental users as the second same batch of users; s606, system performance of the second system version is determined based on the second same batch of users.

It is easily understood that, when the system performance determination apparatus acquires the first upgrade time point of the first system version and the second upgrade time point of the second system version, the system performance determination apparatus may detect whether a time interval between the first upgrade time point and the second upgrade time point is less than a preset time interval. When the system performance determination device determines that the time interval between the first upgrade time point and the second upgrade time point is greater than the preset time interval, the system performance determination device may acquire a third set of users of a third system version. And the third upgrading time point and the second upgrading time point of the third system version are smaller than the preset time interval. The third system version is a system version after the first system version and before the second system version. For example, the third system version may be a system version after the first system version is upgraded, and the second system version may be a system version after the third system version is upgraded. For example, the system version after the first system version is upgraded may also be a fourth system version, the third system version may be a system version after the fourth system version is upgraded, and the second system version may be a system version after the third system version is upgraded.

Optionally, when the system performance determination device obtains a third batch of users of a third system version, the system performance determination device may detect whether incremental users exist in the third batch of users. And when the system performance determination device detects that the third batch of users has no incremental users, determining a second same batch of users of the system based on the second batch of users and the third batch of users. When the system performance determination device detects that the third batch of users has the incremental users, the incremental users are determined as the second batch of users. The system performance determining means may determine the system performance of the second system version based on the second homogeneous user. The system performance determining device can determine the system performance of the second system version based on the third batch of users and the second same batch of users of the second batch of users, reduce the inaccuracy of determining the system performance of the second system version based on the second batch of users directly, and improve the accuracy of determining the system performance.

Alternatively, the preset time interval may be, for example, 50 days. Fig. 10 is a schematic diagram showing an upgrade time point of a system version of the embodiment of the present application. As shown in fig. 10, the first upgrade time point of the first system version acquired by the system performance determination apparatus may be, for example, 2020.01.02, the second upgrade time point of the second system version may be, for example, 2020.04.05, and the third upgrade time point of the third system version may be, for example, 2020.02.28. The system performance determination means may acquire the third group of users when the system performance determination means determines that the time interval of the first upgrade time point 2020.01.02 and the second upgrade time point 2020.04.05 is greater than the preset time interval of 50 days.

According to some embodiments, when the system performance determination device detects that the third group of users does not have incremental users, the third group of users are some or all of the users that may be the first group of users. The system performance determination means may determine a second same group of users of the system based on the second group of users and the third group of users. When the system performance determination device detects that the third group of users has the incremental users, the third group of users are all users and the incremental users, for example, of the first group of users. The system performance determination means may determine the second homogeneous user of the system based on the second batch of users and the third batch of users, i.e. the system performance determination means may determine the second homogeneous user of the system based on the second batch of users, the first batch of users and the incremental users.

S203, acquiring a first duration corresponding to a first batch of users in the first system version and a second duration corresponding to the first batch of users in the second system version.

According to some embodiments, when the system performance determination apparatus determines the first peer user of the system based on the first peer user and the second peer user, the system performance determination apparatus may obtain a first duration corresponding to the first peer user in the first system version and a second duration corresponding to the first peer user in the second system version.

It is readily understood that the first fellow users may be, for example, W1 users, W2 users, W3 users, W4 users, W5 users, W6 users, W7 users, W8 users. The first duration corresponding to the first peer user in the first system version acquired by the system performance determination apparatus may be, for example, 5.3 hours, 5.2 hours, 5.0 hours, 5.9 hours, 5.2 hours, 5.4 hours, 5.6 hours, and 5.1 hours, respectively. The second duration that the system performance determination apparatus acquires the first peer user in the second system version may be, for example, 6.3 hours, 6.2 hours, 6.0 hours, 6.9 hours, 6.2 hours, 6.4 hours, 6.6 hours, and 6.1 hours, respectively.

And S204, determining the system performance of the second system version based on the first endurance time and the second endurance time.

According to some embodiments, when the system performance determination device obtains the first duration and the second duration, the system performance determination device may determine the system performance of the second system version based on the first duration and the second duration, that is, the system performance determination device may determine the cruising ability of the second system version.

It is easy to understand that the first duration corresponding to the first peer user in the first system version acquired by the system performance determination apparatus may be, for example, 5.3 hours, 5.2 hours, 5.0 hours, 5.9 hours, 5.2 hours, 5.4 hours, 5.6 hours, and 5.1 hours, respectively. The second duration that the system performance determination apparatus acquires the first peer user in the second system version may be, for example, 6.3 hours, 6.2 hours, 6.0 hours, 6.9 hours, 6.2 hours, 6.4 hours, 6.6 hours, and 6.1 hours, respectively. The system performance determination device may obtain a first average duration of a first duration corresponding to the first batched users and a second average duration of a second duration corresponding to the first batched users by using a mean algorithm. When the system performance determination means determines that the second average cruising duration is longer than the first average cruising duration, the system performance determination means may determine that the system performance of the second system version is good.

Alternatively, after the system performance determining means determines the system performance of the second system version, a corresponding level may be set for the system performance of the second system version. For example, when the system performance determination means determines that the system performance of the second system version is better than the system performance of the first system version, the performance level of the system performance of the first system version may be set to the D level, and the performance level of the system performance of the second system version may be set to the C level.

The embodiment of the application provides a method for determining system performance, which can determine the system performance of a second system version based on a first duration corresponding to a first batch of users in the first system version and a second duration corresponding to a first batch of users in the second system version by acquiring the first batch of users using the first system version and the first batch of users using the second system version, reduce inaccuracy of determining the system performance of the second system version directly based on the second duration of the second batch of users, and improve the accuracy of determining the system duration. In addition, the terminal identification number has uniqueness, so that the accuracy of acquiring the first batch users can be improved based on the terminal identification number, and the accuracy of determining the system performance can be further improved.

The system performance determination apparatus provided in the embodiment of the present application will be described in detail below with reference to fig. 11. It should be noted that, the system performance determining apparatus shown in fig. 11 is used for executing the method of the embodiment shown in fig. 2 to fig. 10 of the present application, and for convenience of description, only the portion related to the embodiment of the present application is shown, and details of the specific technology are not disclosed, please refer to the embodiment shown in fig. 2 to fig. 10 of the present application.

Please refer to fig. 11, which shows a schematic structural diagram of a system performance determining apparatus according to an embodiment of the present application. The system performance determining apparatus 1100 may be implemented by software, hardware, or a combination of both as all or a part of a user terminal. According to some embodiments, the system performance determination apparatus 1100 includes a user obtaining unit 1101, a same batch user obtaining unit 1102, and a performance determination unit 1103, and is specifically configured to:

a user obtaining unit 1101, configured to obtain a first batch of users using a first system version and a second batch of users using a second system version, where the second system version is a system version upgraded from the first system version;

a same batch user acquiring unit 1102, configured to acquire a first same batch user of the first batch users and the second batch users;

a performance determining unit 1103, configured to determine a system performance of the second system version based on the first peer user.

According to some embodiments, the performance determining unit 1103 is configured to, when determining the system performance of the second system version based on the first peer user, specifically:

acquiring a first duration corresponding to a first batch of users in a first system version and a second duration corresponding to the first batch of users in a second system version;

and determining the system performance of the second system version based on the first endurance time and the second endurance time.

According to some embodiments, the same batch user obtaining unit 1102 is configured to, when determining the first same batch user of the system based on the first batch user and the second batch user, specifically:

acquiring first terminal identification numbers corresponding to the first group of users and second terminal identification numbers corresponding to the second group of users;

acquiring a terminal identification number intersection of the first terminal identification number and the second terminal identification number;

and determining the user corresponding to at least one terminal identification number in the terminal identification number collection as a first batch user.

According to some embodiments, the user obtaining unit 1101, when obtaining a second batch of users using a second system version, is specifically configured to:

upgrading a first system version of the system to obtain a second system version of the system;

and when the change quantity of the users using the second system version in the preset time is smaller than a preset change quantity threshold value, acquiring a second batch of users using the second system version.

acquiring a first upgrading time point of a first system version and a second upgrading time point of a second system version;

and when the time interval between the first upgrading time point and the second upgrading time point is smaller than the preset time interval, determining a first batch of users of the system based on the first batch of users and the second batch of users.

According to some embodiments, the same-batch user obtaining unit 1102 is further configured to, after obtaining the first upgrade time of the first system version and the second upgrade time of the second system version:

when the time interval between the first upgrading time point and the second upgrading time point is larger than the preset time interval, acquiring a third batch of users of a third system version, wherein the third system version is a system version behind the first system version and before the second system version, and the time interval between the third upgrading time point and the second upgrading time point of the third system version is smaller than the preset time interval;

when detecting that the third batch of users have no incremental users, determining second same batch of users of the system based on the second batch of users and the third batch of users;

the performance determining unit 1103 is configured to, when determining the system performance of the second system version, specifically:

system performance of the second system version is determined based on the second same batch of users.

According to some embodiments, the same-batch user obtaining unit 1102 is configured to, after obtaining a third batch of users of a third system version when a time interval between the first upgrade time point and the second upgrade time point is greater than a preset time interval, further specifically:

and when detecting that the third batch of users have the incremental users, determining a second batch of users based on the first batch of users, the incremental users and the second batch of users.

The embodiment of the application provides a system performance determining device, a user acquiring unit acquires a first group of users using a first system version and a second group of users using a second system version, wherein, the second system version is the system version after the first system version is upgraded, the same batch user obtaining unit obtains the first same batch users of the first batch users and the second batch users, the performance determining unit determines the system performance of the second system version based on the first same batch users, therefore, the system performance of the second system version may be determined based on performance data of the first co-batch users before and after the system version is upgraded, reducing instances of determining the system performance of the second system version directly based on the second batch users, reducing inaccuracies in system performance determination, the accuracy of obtaining and determining the system performance data can be improved, and the accuracy of determining the system performance can be further improved.

Please refer to fig. 12, which is a schematic structural diagram of a terminal according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. As shown in fig. 12, the terminal 1200 may include: at least one processor 1201, at least one network interface 1204, a user interface 1203, memory 1205, at least one communication bus 1202.

Wherein a communication bus 1202 is used to enable connective communication between these components.

The user interface 1203 may include a Display screen (Display) and a GPS, and the optional user interface 1203 may also include a standard wired interface and a wireless interface.

The network interface 1204 may optionally include a standard wired interface, a wireless interface (e.g., WI-FI interface).

Processor 1201 may include one or more processing cores, among others. The processor 1201 interfaces various components throughout the terminal 1200 using various interfaces and lines to perform various functions and manipulate data of the terminal 1200 by executing or performing instructions, programs, code sets, or instruction sets stored in the memory 1205, as well as invoking data stored in the memory 1205. Optionally, the processor 1201 may be implemented in at least one hardware form of Digital Signal Processing (DSP), Field-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), and Programmable Logic Array (PLA). The processor 1201 may integrate one or a combination of a Central Processing Unit (CPU), a Graphics Processing Unit (GPU), a modem, and the like. Wherein, the CPU mainly processes an operating system, a user interface, an application program and the like; the GPU is used for rendering and drawing the content required to be displayed by the display screen; the modem is used to handle wireless communications. It is understood that the modem may not be integrated into the processor 1201, and may be implemented by a single chip.

The Memory 1205 may include a Random Access Memory (RAM) or a Read-Only Memory (Read-Only Memory). Optionally, the memory 1205 includes a non-transitory computer-readable medium (non-transitory computer-readable storage medium). The memory 1205 may be used to store an instruction, a program, code, a set of codes, or a set of instructions. The memory 1205 may include a stored program area and a stored data area, wherein the stored program area may store instructions for implementing an operating system, instructions for at least one function (such as a touch function, a sound playing function, an image playing function, etc.), instructions for implementing the various method embodiments described above, and the like; the storage data area may store data and the like referred to in the above respective method embodiments. The memory 1205 may also optionally be at least one storage device located remotely from the processor 1201 described previously. As shown in fig. 12, the memory 1205, which is a computer storage medium, may include an operating system, a network communication module, a user interface module, and an application program for system performance determination.

In the terminal 1200 shown in fig. 12, the user interface 1203 is mainly used for providing an input interface for a user, and acquiring data input by the user; the processor 1201 may be configured to call the application program with the determined system performance stored in the memory 1205, and specifically perform the following operations:

acquiring first batch users of the first batch of users and the second batch of users;

system performance of the second system version is determined based on the first peer user.

According to some embodiments, the processor 1201 is configured to, when determining the system performance of the second system version based on the first peer user, specifically perform the following steps:

According to some embodiments, the processor 1201 is configured to, when determining a first batch of users of the system based on the first batch of users and the second batch of users, specifically perform the following steps:

According to some embodiments, the processor 1201, when being configured to acquire a second group of users using a second system version, is specifically configured to perform the following steps:

According to some embodiments, after the processor 1201 is configured to obtain the first upgrade time of the first system version and the second upgrade time of the second system version, the processor is further specifically configured to perform the following steps:

the processor 1201 is configured to, when determining the system performance of the second system version, specifically perform the following steps:

According to some embodiments, the processor 1201 is configured to, when the time interval between the first upgrade time point and the second upgrade time point is greater than the preset time interval, after acquiring a third batch of users of a third system version, specifically, when the time interval is longer than the preset time interval, execute the following steps:

The embodiment of the application provides a terminal, which can determine the system performance of a second system version based on a first batch of users using a first system version and a first co-batch of users using a second system version, can determine the system performance of the second system version based on performance data of the first co-batch of users before and after the system version is upgraded, reduce the situation that the system performance of the second system version is determined directly based on the second batch of users, reduce the inaccuracy of system performance determination, improve the accuracy of obtaining and determining system performance data, and further improve the accuracy of system performance determination.

The present application also provides a computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon a computer program which, when executed by a processor, performs the steps of the above-described method. The computer-readable storage medium may include, but is not limited to, any type of disk including floppy disks, optical disks, DVD, CD-ROMs, microdrive, and magneto-optical disks, ROMs, RAMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, DRAMs, VRAMs, flash memory devices, magnetic or optical cards, nanosystems (including molecular memory ICs), or any type of media or device suitable for storing instructions and/or data.

Embodiments of the present application also provide a computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing a computer program operable to cause a computer to perform some or all of the steps of any one of the system performance determination methods as described in the above method embodiments.

It is clear to a person skilled in the art that the solution of the present application can be implemented by means of software and/or hardware. The "unit" and "module" in this specification refer to software and/or hardware that can perform a specific function independently or in cooperation with other components, where the hardware may be, for example, a Field-ProgrammaBLE Gate Array (FPGA), an Integrated Circuit (IC), or the like.

It should be noted that, for simplicity of description, the above-mentioned method embodiments are described as a series of acts or combination of acts, but those skilled in the art will recognize that the present application is not limited by the order of acts described, as some steps may occur in other orders or concurrently depending on the application. Further, those skilled in the art should also appreciate that the embodiments described in the specification are preferred embodiments and that the acts and modules referred to are not necessarily required in this application.

In the foregoing embodiments, the descriptions of the respective embodiments have respective emphasis, and for parts that are not described in detail in a certain embodiment, reference may be made to related descriptions of other embodiments.

In the embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed apparatus may be implemented in other manners. For example, the above-described embodiments of the apparatus are merely illustrative, and for example, the division of the units is only one type of division of logical functions, and there may be other divisions when actually implementing, for example, a plurality of units or components may be combined or may be integrated into another system, or some features may be omitted, or not implemented. In addition, the shown or discussed mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection may be an indirect coupling or communication connection of some service interfaces, devices or units, and may be an electrical or other form.

The units described as separate parts may or may not be physically separate, and parts displayed as units may or may not be physical units, may be located in one place, or may be distributed on a plurality of network units. Some or all of the units can be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of the embodiment.

In addition, functional units in the embodiments of the present application may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist alone physically, or two or more units are integrated into one unit. The integrated unit can be realized in a form of hardware, and can also be realized in a form of a software functional unit.

The integrated unit, if implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as a stand-alone product, may be stored in a computer readable memory. Based on such understanding, the technical solution of the present application may be substantially implemented or a part of or all or part of the technical solution contributing to the prior art may be embodied in the form of a software product stored in a memory, and including several instructions for causing a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a server, or a network device) to execute all or part of the steps of the method described in the embodiments of the present application. And the aforementioned memory comprises: various media capable of storing program codes, such as a usb disk, a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a Random Access Memory (RAM), a removable hard disk, a magnetic disk, or an optical disk.

Those skilled in the art will appreciate that all or part of the steps in the methods of the above embodiments may be implemented by a program, which is stored in a computer-readable memory, and the memory may include: flash disks, Read-Only memories (ROMs), Random Access Memories (RAMs), magnetic or optical disks, and the like.

The above description is only an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, and the scope of the present disclosure should not be limited thereby. That is, all equivalent changes and modifications made in accordance with the teachings of the present disclosure are intended to be included within the scope of the present disclosure. Other embodiments of the disclosure will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the disclosure herein. This application is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the disclosure following, in general, the principles of the disclosure and including such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice within the art to which the disclosure pertains. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the disclosure being indicated by the following claims.

Claims

1. A method for system performance determination, the method comprising:

2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the system performance of the second system version based on the first peer user comprises:

acquiring a first duration corresponding to the first batched users in the first system version and a second duration corresponding to the first batched users in the second system version;

determining system performance of the second system version based on the first duration and the second duration.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein determining a first co-batch user of the system based on the first batch of users and the second batch of users comprises:

acquiring first terminal identification numbers corresponding to the first batch of users respectively and second terminal identification numbers corresponding to the second batch of users respectively;

and determining the user corresponding to at least one terminal identification number in the terminal identification number intersection as the first batch user.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein obtaining a second set of users using a second system version comprises:

upgrading the first system version of the system to obtain the second system version of the system;

and when the change quantity of the users using the second system version in a preset time length is smaller than a preset change quantity threshold value, acquiring the second batch of users using the second system version.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein determining a first co-batch user of the system based on the first batch of users and the second batch of users comprises:

acquiring a first upgrading time point of the first system version and a second upgrading time point of the second system version;

and when the time interval between the first upgrading time point and the second upgrading time point is smaller than a preset time interval, determining a first batch of users of the system based on the first batch of users and the second batch of users.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein after obtaining the first upgrade time point of the first system version and the second upgrade time point of the second system version, further comprising:

when the time interval between the first upgrading time point and the second upgrading time point is greater than a preset time interval, acquiring a third batch of users of a third system version, wherein the third system version is a system version behind the first system version and before the second system version, and the time interval between the third upgrading time point and the second upgrading time point of the third system version is less than the preset time interval;

when detecting that the third batch of users has no incremental users, determining second same batch of users of the system based on the second batch of users and the third batch of users;

wherein the determining the system performance of the second system version comprises:

determining a system performance of the second system version based on the second co-batched users.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein after acquiring a third set of users of a third system version when the time interval between the first upgrade time point and the second upgrade time point is greater than a preset time interval, further comprising:

and when the third batch of users are detected to have the incremental users, determining the second same batch of users based on the first batch of users, the incremental users and the second batch of users.

8. A system performance determination apparatus, the apparatus comprising:

9. A terminal comprising a memory, a processor and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that the processor implements the method of any of the preceding claims 1-7 when executing the computer program.

10. A computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, which program, when being executed by a processor, is adapted to carry out the method of any one of the preceding claims 1 to 7.