CN112180312A - Current sensor composite fault diagnosis method - Google Patents
Current sensor composite fault diagnosis method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN112180312A CN112180312A CN202010856198.9A CN202010856198A CN112180312A CN 112180312 A CN112180312 A CN 112180312A CN 202010856198 A CN202010856198 A CN 202010856198A CN 112180312 A CN112180312 A CN 112180312A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- fault
- current sensor
- composite
- gain
- sample
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R35/00—Testing or calibrating of apparatus covered by the other groups of this subclass
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Testing Electric Properties And Detecting Electric Faults (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a composite fault diagnosis method for a current sensor, which comprises the following steps: simulating two-phase current when the current sensor fails through simulation software to obtain corresponding current waveforms; extracting the characteristics of the current waveform from a time domain angle to obtain fault characteristics; screening and reconstructing fault characteristics by using a gradient lifting tree to obtain corresponding one-hot codes; taking the one-hot code as a training sample, and training by adopting a logistic regression algorithm to obtain a parameter-optimized combination model; and inputting the current sensor sample to be tested into the combined model, extracting the fault characteristics of the sample to be tested by the combined model according to the optimized parameters, diagnosing and outputting the fault condition. According to the invention, the fault characteristics are extracted from the angles of a plurality of time domain characteristic values, so that the omission of fault information is avoided; the dependence on an accurate physical model is low; the method can more accurately diagnose gain faults, bias faults and composite faults of the gain faults and the bias faults in the current sensor, and is simple and easy to implement.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to current sensor fault diagnosis, in particular to a current sensor composite fault diagnosis method.
Background
The traction transmission system of the high-speed train is connected with the personal safety and the property safety of passengers in a myriad ways, so that strict requirements are imposed on the reliability of the traction transmission system. The traction transmission system converts electric energy into mechanical energy, which is a core part of the whole high-speed train, if one of the components is damaged and cannot be processed in time, chain reaction may be caused, other components are influenced, composite obstacles are caused, and finally, the operation of the high-speed train is influenced.
The current sensor contained in the three-level inverter in the traction transmission system is most prone to failure, and an accurate and reliable failure diagnosis method is needed for supervision. The traditional fault diagnosis method is based on an analytical model method, but the method relies on an accurate mathematical model. At present, a sliding-mode observer method, a load current analysis method and the like are commonly used as methods for fault diagnosis of a current sensor, but the methods mainly consider single fault conditions, lack of extraction and analysis of different fault characteristics and are difficult to realize accurate diagnosis under the condition of compound faults; under the condition of compound faults, the representation of a single fault can be changed and cannot be described by simple linear superposition, so that the effect of a common data driving method is weakened.
Disclosure of Invention
The purpose of the invention is as follows: in view of the above problems, an object of the present invention is to provide a current sensor composite fault diagnosis method for diagnosing a gain fault, a bias fault, and a composite fault of both occurring in a current sensor.
The technical scheme is as follows: the invention provides a composite fault diagnosis method for a current sensor, which comprises the following steps:
(1) simulating two-phase current when the current sensor fails through simulation software to obtain corresponding current waveforms;
(2) extracting the characteristics of the current waveform from a time domain angle to obtain fault characteristics;
(3) screening and reconstructing fault characteristics by using a gradient lifting tree to obtain corresponding unique hot codes, and normalizing and converting the fault characteristics of different magnitudes into the same magnitude so as to avoid the influence of the different magnitudes of values on a model;
(4) taking the one-hot code as a training sample, and training by adopting a logistic regression algorithm to obtain a parameter-optimized combination model;
(5) inputting a current sensor sample to be detected into a combined model, extracting fault characteristics of the sample to be detected by the combined model according to optimized parameters, respectively sending the characteristic samples to a gain fault classifier and a bias fault classifier for fault classification, and respectively outputting detection results by the two classifiers to finish fault diagnosis of the detected sample.
The fault types in the step (1) comprise a bias fault, a gain fault and a composite fault when two faults occur simultaneously.
The fault characteristics in the step (2) comprise mean values, maximum values, minimum values, range differences, standard deviations, mean square values, root mean square, skewness, kurtosis factors, wave form factors, pulse factors and margin factors of four conditions of no fault, gain fault, bias fault and composite fault.
And (4) the combined model in the step (4) consists of the probability of occurrence of the gain fault and the polarization fault.
And (5) the fault conditions comprise no fault, single fault and compound fault.
Has the advantages that: compared with the prior art, the invention has the following remarkable advantages:
1. the fault diagnosis method is based on data, and has low dependence on an accurate physical model;
2. fault characteristics are extracted from the angles of the time domain characteristic values, and omission of fault information is avoided;
3. screening fault features by using a gradient lifting tree, which is beneficial to extracting feature information with high discrimination;
4. training the model by adopting a logistic regression algorithm, so that the model parameter optimization is facilitated;
5. a combined model formed by the double fault classifiers is constructed, the gain fault, the bias fault and the composite fault of the gain fault and the bias fault in the current sensor can be diagnosed more accurately, and the method is simple and easy to implement.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a graph of two-phase current waveforms without fault;
FIG. 3 is a diagram of two-phase current waveforms during an A-phase current sensor offset fault
FIG. 4 is a graph of two-phase current waveforms during a gain fault for a phase A current sensor;
FIG. 5 is a graph of two-phase current waveforms at a composite fault of the A-phase current sensor;
FIG. 6 is a time domain fault signature distribution plot for different fault conditions of a current sensor;
FIG. 7 is a schematic flow chart of a process for gradient lifting tree;
FIG. 8 is a flow chart of the combinatorial model.
Detailed Description
The composite fault diagnosis method for the current sensor, disclosed by the invention, has the flow chart shown in figure 1, and comprises the following steps of:
(1) two-phase current when a bias fault, a gain fault and a composite fault occur simultaneously in the current sensor is simulated through simulation software, and corresponding current waveforms are obtained. As shown in Table 1, the simulated fault parameter setting conditions are as shown in Table 1, and the fault conditions are 81 groups, wherein the gain fault degree is 1 to 1.4, 9 degrees are set, and the degree 1 represents no gain fault; the degree of bias failure was set to 9 degrees from 0 to 40, and the degree 0 indicates no bias failure. Four exemplary sets of current waveform diagrams for the a-phase current sensor with no fault, gain fault, bias fault, and compound fault are shown in fig. 2-5.
TABLE 1 Current sensor composite Fault level settings
(2) And carrying out feature extraction on the current waveform from a time domain angle to obtain fault features. The fault characteristics include mean, maximum, minimum, range, standard deviation, mean square, root mean square, skewness, kurtosis factor, form factor, pulse factor, margin factor, as shown in fig. 6.
(3) And screening and reconstructing fault characteristics by using the gradient lifting tree to obtain corresponding one-hot codes. The gradient lifting tree processing flow diagram is shown in fig. 7.
(4) The one-hot code is used as a training sample, and training is performed by using a logistic regression algorithm to obtain a combined model with optimized parameters, as shown in fig. 8, wherein the combined model comprises a time domain feature extraction link, a gain fault classifier and a bias fault classifier.
(5) Inputting a current sensor sample to be detected into a combined model, extracting fault characteristics of the sample to be detected by the combined model according to optimized parameters, respectively sending the characteristic samples to a gain fault classifier and a bias fault classifier for fault classification, respectively outputting detection results by the two classifiers, and finally judging whether the output sample belongs to no fault, single fault or composite fault according to corresponding rules shown in table 2, namely completing fault diagnosis of the detected sample.
TABLE 2 correspondence between current sensor fault type and classifier output
Claims (5)
1. A composite fault diagnosis method for a current sensor is characterized by comprising the following steps:
(1) simulating two-phase current when the current sensor fails through simulation software to obtain corresponding current waveforms;
(2) extracting the characteristics of the current waveform from a time domain angle to obtain fault characteristics;
(3) screening and reconstructing fault characteristics by using a gradient lifting tree to obtain corresponding one-hot codes;
(4) taking the one-hot code as a training sample, and training by adopting a logistic regression algorithm to obtain a parameter-optimized combination model;
(5) inputting a current sensor sample to be detected into a combined model, extracting fault characteristics of the sample to be detected by the combined model according to optimized parameters, respectively sending the characteristic samples to a gain fault classifier and a bias fault classifier for fault classification, and respectively outputting detection results by the two classifiers to finish fault diagnosis of the detected sample.
2. The current sensor composite fault diagnosis method according to claim 1, wherein the step (1) fault types include a bias fault, a gain fault, and a composite fault when two faults occur simultaneously.
3. The current sensor composite fault diagnosis method of claim 2, wherein the fault characteristics of step (2) include mean, maximum, minimum, range, standard deviation, mean square, root mean square, skewness, kurtosis factor, form factor, pulse factor and margin factor of four conditions of no fault, gain fault, bias fault and composite fault.
4. The current sensor composite fault diagnosis method according to claim 1, wherein the combined model in the step (4) is composed of a gain fault and a polarization fault occurrence probability.
5. The current sensor composite fault diagnostic method of claim 1, wherein the step (5) fault conditions include no fault, single fault, and composite fault.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010856198.9A CN112180312B (en) | 2020-08-24 | 2020-08-24 | Current sensor composite fault diagnosis method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010856198.9A CN112180312B (en) | 2020-08-24 | 2020-08-24 | Current sensor composite fault diagnosis method |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN112180312A true CN112180312A (en) | 2021-01-05 |
CN112180312B CN112180312B (en) | 2022-01-04 |
Family
ID=73924334
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010856198.9A Active CN112180312B (en) | 2020-08-24 | 2020-08-24 | Current sensor composite fault diagnosis method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN112180312B (en) |
Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN106546439A (en) * | 2016-10-13 | 2017-03-29 | 南京航空航天大学 | A kind of combined failure diagnostic method of hydraulic AGC system |
WO2017129030A1 (en) * | 2016-01-29 | 2017-08-03 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Disk failure prediction method and apparatus |
CN109460588A (en) * | 2018-10-22 | 2019-03-12 | 武汉大学 | A kind of equipment fault prediction technique promoting decision tree based on gradient |
CN109596913A (en) * | 2018-11-26 | 2019-04-09 | 国网冀北电力有限公司 | Charging pile failure cause diagnostic method and device |
CN109800888A (en) * | 2019-01-08 | 2019-05-24 | 浙江大学 | A kind of coalcutter online system failure diagnosis based on colony intelligence machine learning |
US20190370130A1 (en) * | 2018-06-01 | 2019-12-05 | Arm Limited | Lockstep processing systems and methods |
CN111045441A (en) * | 2019-12-19 | 2020-04-21 | 南京航空航天大学 | Hypersonic aircraft sensor composite fault self-healing control method |
US10637715B1 (en) * | 2017-05-02 | 2020-04-28 | Conviva Inc. | Fault isolation in over-the-top content (OTT) broadband networks |
CN111242171A (en) * | 2019-12-31 | 2020-06-05 | 中移(杭州)信息技术有限公司 | Model training, diagnosis and prediction method and device for network fault and electronic equipment |
-
2020
- 2020-08-24 CN CN202010856198.9A patent/CN112180312B/en active Active
Patent Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2017129030A1 (en) * | 2016-01-29 | 2017-08-03 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Disk failure prediction method and apparatus |
CN106546439A (en) * | 2016-10-13 | 2017-03-29 | 南京航空航天大学 | A kind of combined failure diagnostic method of hydraulic AGC system |
US10637715B1 (en) * | 2017-05-02 | 2020-04-28 | Conviva Inc. | Fault isolation in over-the-top content (OTT) broadband networks |
US20190370130A1 (en) * | 2018-06-01 | 2019-12-05 | Arm Limited | Lockstep processing systems and methods |
CN109460588A (en) * | 2018-10-22 | 2019-03-12 | 武汉大学 | A kind of equipment fault prediction technique promoting decision tree based on gradient |
CN109596913A (en) * | 2018-11-26 | 2019-04-09 | 国网冀北电力有限公司 | Charging pile failure cause diagnostic method and device |
CN109800888A (en) * | 2019-01-08 | 2019-05-24 | 浙江大学 | A kind of coalcutter online system failure diagnosis based on colony intelligence machine learning |
CN111045441A (en) * | 2019-12-19 | 2020-04-21 | 南京航空航天大学 | Hypersonic aircraft sensor composite fault self-healing control method |
CN111242171A (en) * | 2019-12-31 | 2020-06-05 | 中移(杭州)信息技术有限公司 | Model training, diagnosis and prediction method and device for network fault and electronic equipment |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
Title |
---|
YUNYOU LU 等: "A Data-Based Approach for Sensor Fault Detection and Diagnosis of Electro-Pneumatic Brake", 《 2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROGNOSTICS AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT》 * |
杨正森: "基于FTRL和XGBoost算法的产品故障预测模型", 《计算机系统应用》 * |
殷俊 等: "高铁牵引系统三相逆变器IGBT和电机速度传感器的复合故障诊断", 《机械设计与制造工程》 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN112180312B (en) | 2022-01-04 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN111914883B (en) | Spindle bearing state evaluation method and device based on deep fusion network | |
Wang et al. | Intelligent rolling bearing fault diagnosis via vision ConvNet | |
US20120197605A1 (en) | Comprehensive assessment system and assessment method for vibration and load of wind generating set | |
CN112257530B (en) | Rolling bearing fault diagnosis method based on blind signal separation and support vector machine | |
CN106017876A (en) | Wheel set bearing fault diagnosis method based on equally-weighted local feature sparse filter network | |
CN110823576B (en) | Mechanical anomaly detection method based on generation of countermeasure network | |
CN111678699B (en) | Early fault monitoring and diagnosing method and system for rolling bearing | |
CN112179691A (en) | Mechanical equipment running state abnormity detection system and method based on counterstudy strategy | |
CN106959397B (en) | A kind of design method of the small fault diagnostic system for high-speed rail inverter | |
CN104596780A (en) | Diagnosis method for sensor faults of motor train unit braking system | |
CN108592812A (en) | Fan blade optical fiber load strain characteristics extract and crack monitoring method | |
CN109655266A (en) | A kind of Wind turbines Method for Bearing Fault Diagnosis based on AVMD and spectral coherence analysis | |
CN110595778A (en) | Wind turbine generator bearing fault diagnosis method based on MMF and IGRA | |
CN105954616B (en) | Photovoltaic module method for diagnosing faults based on external characteristics electric parameter | |
CN112308038A (en) | Mechanical equipment fault signal identification method based on classroom type generation confrontation network model | |
Li et al. | Intelligent fault diagnosis of aeroengine sensors using improved pattern gradient spectrum entropy | |
CN116956215A (en) | Fault diagnosis method and system for transmission system | |
CN113627358A (en) | Multi-feature fusion turnout intelligent fault diagnosis method, system and equipment | |
CN112180312B (en) | Current sensor composite fault diagnosis method | |
CN112986821B (en) | Fault diagnosis method for broken blade of variable pitch motor rotor of offshore wind turbine generator | |
Qin et al. | Application of sensitive dimensionless parameters and PSO–SVM for fault classification in rotating machinery | |
CN114659785B (en) | Fault detection method and device for wind driven generator transmission chain | |
CN116610990A (en) | Method and device for identifying hidden danger of breaker based on characteristic space differentiation | |
CN110490218A (en) | A kind of rolling bearing fault self-learning method based on two-stage DBN | |
CN113821888B (en) | Vibration data fault diagnosis method based on periodic impact feature extraction and echo state network |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |