CN112179990A - Carbon fiber composite material fatigue damage probability imaging method based on ToF damage factor - Google Patents

Carbon fiber composite material fatigue damage probability imaging method based on ToF damage factor Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN112179990A
CN112179990A CN202010964437.2A CN202010964437A CN112179990A CN 112179990 A CN112179990 A CN 112179990A CN 202010964437 A CN202010964437 A CN 202010964437A CN 112179990 A CN112179990 A CN 112179990A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
damage
excitation
tof
probability
signal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202010964437.2A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
叶波
孔琼英
邓为权
王丹宏
陈宸
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kunming University of Science and Technology
Original Assignee
Kunming University of Science and Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kunming University of Science and Technology filed Critical Kunming University of Science and Technology
Priority to CN202010964437.2A priority Critical patent/CN112179990A/en
Publication of CN112179990A publication Critical patent/CN112179990A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N29/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
    • G01N29/04Analysing solids
    • G01N29/06Visualisation of the interior, e.g. acoustic microscopy
    • G01N29/0654Imaging
    • G01N29/069Defect imaging, localisation and sizing using, e.g. time of flight diffraction [TOFD], synthetic aperture focusing technique [SAFT], Amplituden-Laufzeit-Ortskurven [ALOK] technique
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N29/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
    • G01N29/44Processing the detected response signal, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a carbon fiber composite material fatigue damage probability imaging method based on a ToF damage factor, and belongs to the technical field of engineering structure health monitoring. Firstly, uniformly dividing a monitored area in a piezoelectric sensing network into N small grids, and regarding each small grid as a pixel point; then calculating the ToF damage factor of each excitation-sensing channel; secondly, calculating the damage existence probability of each pixel point in each excitation-sensing channel according to the ToF damage factor; and finally, overlapping the damage probability of each pixel point in each excitation-sensing channel, mapping the damage existence probability of each pixel point into a pixel value and imaging, wherein the position with higher damage probability in an imaging image is the position where damage possibly exists. Compared with the traditional damage probability imaging method, the damage probability imaging method can accurately identify and position the damage, effectively improve the visualization effect of damage imaging, and obtain the approximate shape and size of the damage.

Description

Carbon fiber composite material fatigue damage probability imaging method based on ToF damage factor
Technical Field
The invention relates to a carbon fiber composite material fatigue damage probability imaging method based on a ToF damage factor, and belongs to the technical field of engineering structure health monitoring.
Background
Compared with metal materials, the carbon fiber composite material has the advantages of high specific stiffness, high specific strength, high temperature resistance, corrosion resistance, fatigue resistance, light weight and the like, and is widely applied to the field of aerospace. However, various defects and damages are continuously generated in the composite material during material processing, part manufacturing and service, wherein fatigue damage is a common and typical kind of damage. The fatigue damage is that the inside of a material forms tiny damage at the initial stage under the continuous load circulation action, the internal damage gradually expands along with the repeated action of the load until the material breaks, but the forming process of the internal damage is difficult to detect, and once the fatigue damage expands to a certain degree, serious economic loss and personal safety can be caused. Therefore, it is very important to find the information of the existence, position, etc. of the fatigue damage in time.
The structure health monitoring technology can monitor the structure in real time and on line, and is widely applied to the aerospace field. At present, various methods for monitoring the structural health are available, such as an electromechanical impedance method, an optical fiber sensing monitoring method, an intelligent coating method, various damage imaging methods based on Lamb waves and the like. Among them, the Lamb wave-based damage imaging method is widely studied by domestic and foreign scholars because the information such as the position and size of the damage in the structure can be intuitively reflected.
Among various damage imaging methods, the damage probability imaging method is deeply researched by many scholars because the damage probability imaging method is simple to operate, requires a small amount of data, performs imaging by using damage factors and weight distribution functions of various sensing channels, does not need the propagation velocity of guided waves, and is suitable for complex structures. Although the existing damage probability imaging method can effectively identify damage, the visualization effect and the damage positioning accuracy are poor, the imaging definition is not high, and the damage existence probability of the damage position without damage is generally higher.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a carbon fiber composite material fatigue damage probability imaging method based on a ToF damage factor, which is used for solving the problems.
The invention designs a new damage factor on the basis of the traditional damage probability imaging method, and the proposed ToF damage factor is that the damage probability imaging method is improved by utilizing the relation between Lamb wave flight time under the condition that damage exists in each sensing channel and the flight time under the structural health condition, so that the accuracy of damage positioning is improved, the visual effect of damage imaging is effectively improved, the rough shape and size of the damage are preliminarily obtained, the defects of the existing damage probability imaging method are effectively made up, and valuable reference is provided for further realizing the fatigue damage quantitative analysis of the carbon fiber composite material.
The technical scheme of the invention is as follows: a carbon fiber composite material fatigue damage probability imaging method based on ToF damage factors comprises the following specific steps:
step 1: the method comprises the steps of uniformly dividing a monitored area in a piezoelectric sensing network into N small grids, and regarding each small grid as a pixel point.
Step 2: and calculating the ToF damage factor of each excitation-sensing channel.
Step 3: and calculating the damage existence probability of each pixel point in each excitation-sensing channel according to the ToF damage factor.
Step 4: and overlapping the damage existence probability of each pixel point in each excitation-sensing channel, mapping the damage existence probability of each pixel point into a pixel value and imaging, wherein the position with high damage probability in an imaging picture is the position where damage exists.
The Step1 is specifically as follows:
step1.1: and respectively arranging a group of one-dimensional linear piezoelectric sensor arrays consisting of K piezoelectric sensors at the upper edge and the lower edge of the carbon fiber composite material plate.
Step1.2: the sensor array located on the upper edge portion of the carbon fiber composite material plate serves as an exciter, the number of the sensor array is 1-K from right to left, the sensor array located on the lower portion serves as a receiver, and the number of the sensor array is K-2K from left to right.
Step1.3: the actuators 1-K respectively and alternately excite Lamb wave signals, and the receivers respectively receive signals excited by the actuators, for example, the actuator 1 excites Lamb wave signals, the signals are respectively received by the receivers K-2K after being propagated in a monitored structure, the actuator 2 excites Lamb wave signals after being received, the signals are received by the receivers K-2K after being propagated in the structure, and so on, the actuators 3 to K respectively excite Lamb wave signals, and the receivers K-2K respectively receive to form K2M excitation-sensing channels.
Step1.4: the monitored area is evenly divided into N small grids with the same size, and each small grid is regarded as a pixel point.
The Step2 is specifically as follows: and improving the damage probability imaging method by utilizing the relationship between the Lamb wave flight time under the condition that the damage of each sensing channel exists and the flight time under the structural health condition.
Step2.1: under the structural health condition, performing Hilbert transform on the excitation signal and the response signal of each excitation-sensing channel and taking an absolute value to obtain a Hilbert transform module value graph, wherein the time corresponding to the maximum value of the coefficient module values of the excitation signal and the response signal in the graph is the emission time T of the excitation signalbe(i)And the arrival time T of the response signalbr(i)The time of flight of the health signal is
Figure BDA0002681709990000021
Step2.2: and under the condition that the structure has damage, subtracting the health reference signal of the corresponding channel from the response signal of each excitation-sensing channel to obtain the damage scattering signal of each excitation-sensing channel.
Step2.3: under the condition that the structure has damage, performing Hilbert transform on the excitation signal and the damage scattering signal of each excitation-sensing channel and taking the absolute value to obtain a Hilbert transform module value graph, wherein the moments corresponding to the maximum values of the coefficient module values of the excitation signal and the damage scattering signal in the graph are respectively the sending moments T of the excitation signalce(i)And the arrival time T of the damage scattered signaldr(i)The time of flight of the impairment scatter signal is
Figure BDA0002681709990000022
Step2.4: the TOF damage factor is obtained according to the flight time calculated by Step2.1-Step2.3, and the expression is as follows:
Figure BDA0002681709990000031
in the formula (1), the reaction mixture is,
Figure BDA0002681709990000032
the flight time of the health reference signal and the flight time of the damage scattering signal of the ith excitation-sensing path are respectively.
The Step3 is specifically as follows:
calculating the damage existence probability of each pixel point in each excitation-sensing channel according to the ToF damage factor in Step2, and assuming that M excitation-sensing channels are shared in the sensing network, the damage existence probability P of any pixel point (x, y) in the ith excitation-sensing channeli(x, y) is:
Pi(x,y)=DITi·Wi[Ri(x,y)] (2)
in the formula (2), DITiThe ToF damage factor for the ith excitation-sensing channel indicates the degree of difference between the characteristic monitoring signal and the healthy reference signal. Wi[Ri(x, y) is a weight distribution function of the ith excitation-sensing channel and the relative distance R between any pixel point (x, y) and a direct path of the ith excitation-sensing channeli(x, y) is related, which is assumed to be a linearly decaying elliptical distribution, expressed as follows:
Figure BDA0002681709990000033
Figure BDA0002681709990000034
in the formulas (3) and (4), beta is a size parameter for controlling the influence area of the elliptical distribution, the value of the size parameter beta is 0.1, and (x)a,i,ya,i) To excite the coordinates of sensor A, (x)s,i,ys,i) To receive the coordinates of the sensor S, Da,i(x, y) is the distance of the excitation sensor to any pixel (x, y), Ds,i(x, y) is the distance from the receiving sensor to any pixel (x, y), DiIs the distance from the excitation sensor to the receiving sensor, i.e. the focal length of the ellipse.
The Step4 is specifically as follows:
the damage probability P of each pixel point in each excitation-sensing channel obtained by superposing Step3i(x, y), mapping the damage existence probability P (x, y) of each pixel point into a pixel value and imaging, wherein the position with high damage probability in an imaging graph is the position where the damage exists, and the damage existence probability P (x, y) of each pixel point is as follows:
Figure BDA0002681709990000041
the meaning of the large damage probability in the invention is that the damage probability is larger than the value of the size parameter beta.
The invention has the beneficial effects that:
1. the accuracy of damage positioning can be effectively improved;
2. the visual effect of damage imaging can be effectively improved, and the definition of the damage imaging is improved;
3. the rough shape and size of the lesion can be preliminarily obtained;
4. the method is simple to operate, needs a small amount of data, does not need the propagation speed of guided waves, and is suitable for complex structures;
5. the damage probability of the position without damage in the imaging result is extremely low, even most of the damage probability is zero, and the condition that the damage probability of the position without damage is higher in the existing damage probability imaging result is effectively remedied.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of the relative distance of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic view and a physical diagram of a test piece according to the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a time domain, frequency domain diagram of an excitation signal of the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a diagram of the healthy reference signal of paths 1-8 of the present invention and its Hilbert envelope;
FIG. 6 is a graph of the current monitor signal and its Hilbert envelope for paths 1-8 of the present invention;
FIG. 7 is a graph of the lesion scatter signals of paths 1-8 of the present invention and their Hilbert envelopes;
FIG. 8 is a Hilbert transform modulus graph of the health reference signal corresponding to paths 1-8 of the present invention;
FIG. 9 is a numerical graph of the TOF damage factor of the present invention;
FIG. 10 is an X-ray diagram of a test piece of the present invention and a ToF damage factor-based imaging result of fatigue damage probability of carbon fiber composite material.
Detailed Description
The invention is further described with reference to the following drawings and detailed description.
As shown in fig. 3, the embodiment of the present invention takes the damage detection and localization of fatigue damage of the carbon fiber composite material plate as an example, the size of the carbon fiber composite material plate is a dog bone geometry of 25.4cm by 15.24cm, and the left middle edge has a small notch of 5.08mm by 19.3mm designed to induce load concentration.
As shown in fig. 1, a ToF damage factor-based carbon fiber composite material fatigue damage probability imaging method, wherein the ToF damage factor-based damage probability imaging step on a region to be detected comprises:
step 1: uniformly dividing a monitored area in a piezoelectric sensing network into 600 × 360 small grids, and regarding each small grid as a pixel point;
step1.1: respectively arranging a group of one-dimensional linear piezoelectric sensor arrays consisting of 6 piezoelectric sensors on the upper edge and the lower edge of the carbon fiber composite material plate;
step1.2: the sensor array positioned at the upper edge part of the carbon fiber composite material plate is used as an exciter, the number of the sensor array is 1-6 from right to left, the sensor array positioned at the lower part is used as a receiver, and the number of the sensor array is 7-12 from left to right;
step1.3: the actuators 1 to 6 respectively and alternately excite Lamb wave signals, and the receivers respectively receive signals excited by the actuators, for example, the actuator 1 excites Lamb wave signals, the signals are respectively received by the receivers 7 to 12 after being propagated in a monitored structure, the actuator 2 excites Lamb wave signals after the signals are received, the actuators 3 to 6 respectively excite Lamb wave signals after being propagated in the structure, the receivers 7 to 12 respectively receive the signals, and so on, and 6 × 6 to 36 excitation-sensing channels are formed in a conformal manner;
step1.4: the monitored area is evenly divided into 600 × 360 small grids with the same size, and each small grid is regarded as a pixel point.
Step 2: calculating a ToF damage factor of each excitation-sensing channel;
as shown in fig. 4 to fig. 9, the relationship between Lamb wave flight time in the presence of damage in each sensing channel and flight time in the structural health condition is used to improve the damage probability imaging method;
step2.1: under the structural health condition, performing Hilbert transform on the excitation signal and the response signal of each excitation-sensing channel and taking an absolute value to obtain a Hilbert transform module value graph, wherein the time corresponding to the maximum value of the coefficient module values of the excitation signal and the response signal in the graph is the emission time T of the excitation signalbe(i)And the arrival time T of the response signalbr(i)The time of flight of the health signal is
Figure BDA0002681709990000051
Step2.2: under the condition that the structure has damage, subtracting the health reference signal of the corresponding channel from the response signal of each excitation-sensing channel to obtain a damage scattering signal of each excitation-sensing channel;
step2.3: under the condition that the structure has damage, performing Hilbert transform on the excitation signal and the damage scattering signal of each excitation-sensing channel and taking the absolute value to obtain a Hilbert transform module value graph, wherein the moments corresponding to the maximum values of the coefficient module values of the excitation signal and the damage scattering signal in the graph are respectively the sending moments T of the excitation signalce(i)And the arrival time T of the damage scattered signaldr(i)The time of flight of the impairment scatter signal is
Figure BDA0002681709990000052
Step2.4: obtaining the ToF damage factor according to the flight time obtained in the step Step2.1-Step2.3, wherein the expression is as follows:
Figure BDA0002681709990000061
in the formula (1), the reaction mixture is,
Figure BDA0002681709990000062
the flight time of the health reference signal and the flight time of the damage scattering signal of the ith excitation-sensing path are respectively.
Step 3: calculating the damage existence probability of each pixel point in each excitation-sensing channel according to the ToF damage factor;
calculating the damage existence probability of each pixel point in each excitation-sensing channel according to the ToF damage factor of Step2, wherein 36 excitation-sensing channels are totally arranged in the sensing network, and the damage existence probability P of any pixel point (x, y) in the ith excitation-sensing channeli(x, y) is:
Pi(x,y)=DIi·Wi[Ri(x,y)] (2)
in the formula (2), DIiRepresenting the difference degree between the monitoring signal and the health reference signal for the damage factor of the ith excitation-sensing channel; wi[Ri(x, y) is a weight distribution function of the ith excitation-sensing channel and the relative distance R between any pixel point (x, y) and a direct path of the ith excitation-sensing channeli(x, y) is related, which is assumed to be a linearly decaying elliptical distribution, expressed as follows:
Figure BDA0002681709990000063
Figure BDA0002681709990000064
as shown in fig. 2, in the formulas (3) and (4), β is a size parameter for controlling the ellipse distribution influence area, and has a value of 0.1, (x)a,i,ya,i) To excite the coordinates of sensor A, (x)s,i,ys,i) To receive the coordinates of the sensor S, Da,i(x, y) is the distance of the excitation sensor to any pixel (x, y), Ds,i(x, y) is the distance from the receiving sensor to any pixel (x, y), DiIs the distance from the excitation sensor to the receiving sensor, i.e. the focal length of the ellipse.
Step 4: overlapping the damage probability of each pixel point in each excitation-sensing channel, mapping the damage existence probability of each pixel point into a pixel value and imaging, wherein the position with higher damage probability in an imaging picture is the position where damage possibly exists;
as shown in fig. 10, the damage probability P of each pixel point in each excitation-sensing channel obtained by superimposing Step4i(x, y), mapping the damage existence probability P (x, y) of each pixel point to a pixel value and imaging, wherein the position with higher damage probability in an imaging image is the position where damage possibly exists. The damage existence probability P (x, y) of each pixel point is as follows:
Figure BDA0002681709990000071
the different color regions in the imaging graph of fig. 10 represent different damage existence probabilities, and the position and approximate size and shape information of the damage can be clearly and clearly seen from the imaging graph.
While the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the embodiments shown in the drawings, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments, and various changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.

Claims (5)

1. A carbon fiber composite material fatigue damage probability imaging method based on a ToF damage factor is characterized in that:
step 1: uniformly dividing a monitored area in a piezoelectric sensing network into N small grids, and regarding each small grid as a pixel point;
step 2: calculating a ToF damage factor of each excitation-sensing channel;
step 3: calculating the damage existence probability of each pixel point in each excitation-sensing channel according to the ToF damage factor;
step 4: and overlapping the damage existence probability of each pixel point in each excitation-sensing channel, mapping the damage existence probability of each pixel point into a pixel value and imaging, wherein the position with high damage probability in an imaging picture is the position where damage exists.
2. The ToF damage factor-based carbon fiber composite material fatigue damage probability imaging method according to claim 1, wherein Step1 is specifically as follows:
step1.1: respectively arranging a group of one-dimensional linear piezoelectric sensor arrays consisting of K piezoelectric sensors on the upper edge and the lower edge of the carbon fiber composite material plate;
step1.2: the sensor array positioned at the upper edge part of the carbon fiber composite plate is used as an exciter, the number of the sensor array is 1-K from right to left, the sensor array positioned at the lower part is used as a receiver, and the number of the sensor array is K-2K from left to right;
step1.3: the exciters 1-K respectively excite Lamb wave signals in turn, and the receiver respectively receives the signals excited by the exciters to form K-K2M excitation-sensing channels;
step1.4: the monitored area is evenly divided into N small grids with the same size, and each small grid is regarded as a pixel point.
3. The ToF damage factor-based carbon fiber composite material fatigue damage probability imaging method according to claim 1, wherein Step2 is specifically as follows:
step2.1: under the structural health condition, performing Hilbert transform on the excitation signal and the response signal of each excitation-sensing channel and taking an absolute value to obtain a Hilbert transform module value graph, wherein the time corresponding to the maximum value of the coefficient module values of the excitation signal and the response signal in the graph is the emission time T of the excitation signalbe(i)And the arrival time T of the response signalbr(i)The time of flight of the health signal is TOFbi(t)=Tbr(i)-Tbe(i)
Step2.2: under the condition that the structure has damage, subtracting the health reference signal of the corresponding channel from the response signal of each excitation-sensing channel to obtain a damage scattering signal of each excitation-sensing channel;
step2.3: under the condition that the structure has damage, performing Hilbert transform on the excitation signal and the damage scattering signal of each excitation-sensing channel and taking the absolute value to obtain a Hilbert transform module value graph, wherein the moments corresponding to the maximum values of the coefficient module values of the excitation signal and the damage scattering signal in the graph are respectively the sending moments T of the excitation signalce(i)And the arrival time T of the damage scattered signaldr(i)Time of flight of the lesion scatter signal is TOFdi(t)=Tdr(i)-Tce(i)
Step2.4: the TOF damage factor is obtained according to the flight time calculated by Step2.1-Step2.3, and the expression is as follows:
Figure RE-FDA0002760338290000021
in the formula (1), the reaction mixture is,
Figure RE-FDA0002760338290000022
the flight time of the health reference signal and the flight time of the damage scattering signal of the ith excitation-sensing path are respectively.
4. The ToF damage factor-based carbon fiber composite material fatigue damage probability imaging method according to claim 1, wherein Step3 is specifically as follows:
calculating the damage existence probability of each pixel point in each excitation-sensing channel according to the ToF damage factor in Step2, and assuming that M excitation-sensing channels are shared in the sensing network, the damage existence probability P of any pixel point (x, y) in the ith excitation-sensing channeli(x, y) is:
Pi(x,y)=DITi·Wi[Ri(x,y)] (2)
in the formula (2), DITiA ToF damage factor for the ith excitation-sensing channel, representing the degree of difference between the characteristic monitoring signal and the health reference signal; wi[Ri(x, y) is a weight distribution function of the ith excitation-sensing channel and the relative distance R between any pixel point (x, y) and a direct path of the ith excitation-sensing channeli(x, y) is related, which is assumed to be a linearly decaying elliptical distribution, expressed as follows:
Figure RE-FDA0002760338290000023
Figure RE-FDA0002760338290000024
in the formulas (3) and (4), beta is a size parameter for controlling the influence area of the elliptical distribution, (x)a,i,ya,i) To excite the coordinates of sensor A, (x)s,i,ys,i) To receive the coordinates of the sensor S, Da,i(x, y) is the distance of the excitation sensor to any pixel (x, y), Ds,i(x, y) is the distance from the receiving sensor to any pixel (x, y), DiIs the distance from the excitation sensor to the receiving sensor, i.e. the focal length of the ellipse.
5. The ToF damage factor-based carbon fiber composite material fatigue damage probability imaging method according to claim 1, wherein Step4 is specifically as follows:
the damage probability P of each pixel point in each excitation-sensing channel obtained by superposing Step3i(x, y), mapping the damage existence probability P (x, y) of each pixel point into a pixel value and imaging, wherein the position with high damage probability in an imaging graph is the position where the damage exists, and the damage existence probability P (x, y) of each pixel point is as follows:
Figure RE-FDA0002760338290000031
CN202010964437.2A 2020-09-15 2020-09-15 Carbon fiber composite material fatigue damage probability imaging method based on ToF damage factor Pending CN112179990A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010964437.2A CN112179990A (en) 2020-09-15 2020-09-15 Carbon fiber composite material fatigue damage probability imaging method based on ToF damage factor

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010964437.2A CN112179990A (en) 2020-09-15 2020-09-15 Carbon fiber composite material fatigue damage probability imaging method based on ToF damage factor

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN112179990A true CN112179990A (en) 2021-01-05

Family

ID=73920993

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202010964437.2A Pending CN112179990A (en) 2020-09-15 2020-09-15 Carbon fiber composite material fatigue damage probability imaging method based on ToF damage factor

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN112179990A (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112903818A (en) * 2021-01-21 2021-06-04 北京航空航天大学 Metal plate structure health monitoring system and method
CN113899786A (en) * 2021-10-18 2022-01-07 西北工业大学 Debonding damage detection method and device and electronic equipment
CN113933392A (en) * 2021-10-18 2022-01-14 山东大学 Feature fusion probability reconstruction damage positioning imaging method based on ultrasonic guided waves
CN114235811A (en) * 2021-11-16 2022-03-25 南京航空航天大学 Three-level feature fusion diagnosis method and terminal for aircraft structure damage
CN114384152A (en) * 2022-01-13 2022-04-22 山东大学 Ultrasonic guided wave damage positioning method and system based on search point matching
CN114414659A (en) * 2022-01-21 2022-04-29 山东大学 Non-linear ultrasonic guided wave non-parametric damage identification method and system based on frequency fusion
CN114460175A (en) * 2022-02-28 2022-05-10 西北工业大学 Thin-wall structure damage detection method
CN114813955A (en) * 2022-03-11 2022-07-29 昆明理工大学 Fatigue damage imaging method for carbon fiber composite material
CN114878696A (en) * 2022-07-06 2022-08-09 太原理工大学 Method for identifying layered damage of arc composite laminated plate

Citations (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
RU94025670A (en) * 1994-07-08 1996-05-20 И.М. Уракаев Method of testing of composition of gas mixture and liquid media
CN101903771A (en) * 2007-12-21 2010-12-01 V&M法国公司 Especially for during making or be in the Non-Destructive Testing of the pipe of finished product state
CN101995435A (en) * 2010-11-05 2011-03-30 上海交通大学 Damage detection method based on instantaneous phase changing degree
CN102043016A (en) * 2010-11-05 2011-05-04 上海交通大学 Lamb wave-based autonomous damage identification imaging method
CN102445496A (en) * 2011-10-20 2012-05-09 南京航空航天大学 Lamb-based plate-shaped structure reference-free damage rapid detection method
CN103323527A (en) * 2013-06-06 2013-09-25 南京航空航天大学 Damage no-wave-velocity imaging positioning method based on multidimensional array and spatial filter
CN103963995A (en) * 2013-01-25 2014-08-06 波音公司 System and method for automated crack inspection and repair
CN105488795A (en) * 2015-11-26 2016-04-13 中国商用飞机有限责任公司北京民用飞机技术研究中心 Composite material damage identification method
CN106525968A (en) * 2016-10-19 2017-03-22 中国人民解放军空军勤务学院 Damage probability imaging and positioning method based on subareas
CN107271544A (en) * 2017-07-18 2017-10-20 昆明理工大学 A kind of pulsed eddy-current nondestructive test system based on ZigBee technology
CN108195937A (en) * 2017-11-29 2018-06-22 中国飞机强度研究所 A kind of damage probability imaging method based on guided wave
CN108920861A (en) * 2018-07-17 2018-11-30 暨南大学 A kind of equivalent method of the damage factor of structural unit containing CRACKED BEAM
CN110243944A (en) * 2019-07-03 2019-09-17 南京航空航天大学 A kind of probability statistics imaging method of Aviation Composite Structure poly-injury
CN110412130A (en) * 2019-08-14 2019-11-05 山东大学 Damage of composite materials imaging method based on energy spectrum and Lamb wave chromatography imaging technique
CN110579534A (en) * 2019-09-05 2019-12-17 华东理工大学 non-baseline detection and positioning method for defects of steel plate with welding seam based on reciprocity damage
CN110596242A (en) * 2019-08-30 2019-12-20 南京理工大学 Bridge crane girder local damage positioning method
CN111103153A (en) * 2018-10-25 2020-05-05 上海铁路通信有限公司 Bogie structure safety monitoring device
CN111521691A (en) * 2020-04-30 2020-08-11 南京工业大学 Composite material Lamb wave damage imaging method based on time reversal weighted distribution

Patent Citations (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
RU94025670A (en) * 1994-07-08 1996-05-20 И.М. Уракаев Method of testing of composition of gas mixture and liquid media
CN101903771A (en) * 2007-12-21 2010-12-01 V&M法国公司 Especially for during making or be in the Non-Destructive Testing of the pipe of finished product state
CN101995435A (en) * 2010-11-05 2011-03-30 上海交通大学 Damage detection method based on instantaneous phase changing degree
CN102043016A (en) * 2010-11-05 2011-05-04 上海交通大学 Lamb wave-based autonomous damage identification imaging method
CN102445496A (en) * 2011-10-20 2012-05-09 南京航空航天大学 Lamb-based plate-shaped structure reference-free damage rapid detection method
CN103963995A (en) * 2013-01-25 2014-08-06 波音公司 System and method for automated crack inspection and repair
CN103323527A (en) * 2013-06-06 2013-09-25 南京航空航天大学 Damage no-wave-velocity imaging positioning method based on multidimensional array and spatial filter
CN105488795A (en) * 2015-11-26 2016-04-13 中国商用飞机有限责任公司北京民用飞机技术研究中心 Composite material damage identification method
CN106525968A (en) * 2016-10-19 2017-03-22 中国人民解放军空军勤务学院 Damage probability imaging and positioning method based on subareas
CN107271544A (en) * 2017-07-18 2017-10-20 昆明理工大学 A kind of pulsed eddy-current nondestructive test system based on ZigBee technology
CN108195937A (en) * 2017-11-29 2018-06-22 中国飞机强度研究所 A kind of damage probability imaging method based on guided wave
CN108920861A (en) * 2018-07-17 2018-11-30 暨南大学 A kind of equivalent method of the damage factor of structural unit containing CRACKED BEAM
CN111103153A (en) * 2018-10-25 2020-05-05 上海铁路通信有限公司 Bogie structure safety monitoring device
CN110243944A (en) * 2019-07-03 2019-09-17 南京航空航天大学 A kind of probability statistics imaging method of Aviation Composite Structure poly-injury
CN110412130A (en) * 2019-08-14 2019-11-05 山东大学 Damage of composite materials imaging method based on energy spectrum and Lamb wave chromatography imaging technique
CN110596242A (en) * 2019-08-30 2019-12-20 南京理工大学 Bridge crane girder local damage positioning method
CN110579534A (en) * 2019-09-05 2019-12-17 华东理工大学 non-baseline detection and positioning method for defects of steel plate with welding seam based on reciprocity damage
CN111521691A (en) * 2020-04-30 2020-08-11 南京工业大学 Composite material Lamb wave damage imaging method based on time reversal weighted distribution

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
C. RAMADAS等: "Modelling of attenuation of Lamb waves using Rayleigh damping:Numerical and experimental studies", 《COMPOSITE SRUCTURE》 *
李豪等: "大电机定子绝缘损伤成像检测方法研究", 《噪声与振动控制》 *

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112903818A (en) * 2021-01-21 2021-06-04 北京航空航天大学 Metal plate structure health monitoring system and method
CN113899786B (en) * 2021-10-18 2022-06-28 西北工业大学 Debonding damage detection method and device and electronic equipment
CN113899786A (en) * 2021-10-18 2022-01-07 西北工业大学 Debonding damage detection method and device and electronic equipment
CN113933392A (en) * 2021-10-18 2022-01-14 山东大学 Feature fusion probability reconstruction damage positioning imaging method based on ultrasonic guided waves
CN114235811A (en) * 2021-11-16 2022-03-25 南京航空航天大学 Three-level feature fusion diagnosis method and terminal for aircraft structure damage
CN114235811B (en) * 2021-11-16 2023-11-10 南京航空航天大学 Three-level feature fusion diagnosis method and terminal for aircraft structural damage
CN114384152A (en) * 2022-01-13 2022-04-22 山东大学 Ultrasonic guided wave damage positioning method and system based on search point matching
CN114384152B (en) * 2022-01-13 2023-09-01 山东大学 Ultrasonic guided wave damage positioning method and system based on search point matching
CN114414659A (en) * 2022-01-21 2022-04-29 山东大学 Non-linear ultrasonic guided wave non-parametric damage identification method and system based on frequency fusion
CN114414659B (en) * 2022-01-21 2023-12-29 山东大学 Nonlinear ultrasonic guided wave parameter-free damage identification method and system based on frequency fusion
CN114460175A (en) * 2022-02-28 2022-05-10 西北工业大学 Thin-wall structure damage detection method
CN114460175B (en) * 2022-02-28 2024-03-15 西北工业大学 Thin-wall structure damage detection method
CN114813955A (en) * 2022-03-11 2022-07-29 昆明理工大学 Fatigue damage imaging method for carbon fiber composite material
CN114878696A (en) * 2022-07-06 2022-08-09 太原理工大学 Method for identifying layered damage of arc composite laminated plate
US20230333065A1 (en) * 2022-07-06 2023-10-19 Taiyuan University Of Technology Method of identifying delamination damage of arc-shaped composite laminate
US11846607B2 (en) * 2022-07-06 2023-12-19 Taiyuan University Of Technology Method of identifying delamination damage of arc-shaped composite laminate

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN112179990A (en) Carbon fiber composite material fatigue damage probability imaging method based on ToF damage factor
US12007362B2 (en) Method for reconstructing crack profiles based on composite-mode total focusing method
JP4910769B2 (en) Pipe quality control method and manufacturing method
Muller et al. Structural health monitoring using lamb wave reflections and total focusing method for image reconstruction
CN111122700B (en) Method for improving laser ultrasonic SAFT defect positioning speed
CN108195937B (en) Guided wave-based damage probability imaging method
Posilović et al. Flaw detection from ultrasonic images using YOLO and SSD
CN111521691B (en) Composite material Lamb wave damage imaging method based on time reversal weighted distribution
CN110243923B (en) Visual imaging and evaluation method for corrosion defect based on alternating current electromagnetic field
CN102818851A (en) Detection method for ultrasonic detection of arc-shaped corner of L-shaped workpeice
CN106802323A (en) A kind of ultrasonic total focus imaging system based on complete matrix data
Chen et al. Evolutionary strategy-based location algorithm for high-resolution Lamb wave defect detection with sparse array
CN113075297B (en) Titanium alloy phased array linear array ultrasonic detection sound field model construction method
CN112305080A (en) Phased array ultrasonic detection method for crack of reverse T-shaped blade root groove
CN113504306A (en) Steel rail defect detection method based on ultrasonic phased array low-rank matrix recovery
CN113686960B (en) Phased array curved surface full-focusing imaging optimization method and system for sound field threshold segmentation
JP2020051851A (en) Abnormal state detection method within reinforcing-bar concrete structure
CN115856087B (en) Full-focusing imaging method based on longitudinal wave transmitting-receiving ultrasonic phased array probe
CN115389625B (en) Double-sided ultrasonic imaging method for detecting out-of-plane fiber bending of composite material
Cui et al. Damage detection in thick plate structures based on ultrasonic SH wave
CN114384152B (en) Ultrasonic guided wave damage positioning method and system based on search point matching
Dehghan-Niri et al. Quantitative corrosion imaging of pipelines using multi helical guided ultrasonic waves
Sudharsan et al. Multi modal data fusion of PAUT with thermography assisted by Automatic Defect Recognition System (M-ADR) for NDE Applications
CA3152727A1 (en) Method and system for generating merged b-scan
CN117554493B (en) Method, equipment and medium for detecting near-surface defects of metal material

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20210105