CN112172128A - Method for rapidly optimizing polylactic acid fused deposition molding process based on dual-index orthogonal test combined with support vector machine - Google Patents

Method for rapidly optimizing polylactic acid fused deposition molding process based on dual-index orthogonal test combined with support vector machine Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN112172128A
CN112172128A CN202010847263.1A CN202010847263A CN112172128A CN 112172128 A CN112172128 A CN 112172128A CN 202010847263 A CN202010847263 A CN 202010847263A CN 112172128 A CN112172128 A CN 112172128A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
fused deposition
model
test
support vector
orthogonal test
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202010847263.1A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
杨晨
肖荔人
陆文聪
杨裕金
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Fujian Normal University
University of Shanghai for Science and Technology
Original Assignee
Fujian Normal University
University of Shanghai for Science and Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Fujian Normal University, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology filed Critical Fujian Normal University
Priority to CN202010847263.1A priority Critical patent/CN112172128A/en
Publication of CN112172128A publication Critical patent/CN112172128A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B29WORKING OF PLASTICS; WORKING OF SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE IN GENERAL
    • B29CSHAPING OR JOINING OF PLASTICS; SHAPING OF MATERIAL IN A PLASTIC STATE, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; AFTER-TREATMENT OF THE SHAPED PRODUCTS, e.g. REPAIRING
    • B29C64/00Additive manufacturing, i.e. manufacturing of three-dimensional [3D] objects by additive deposition, additive agglomeration or additive layering, e.g. by 3D printing, stereolithography or selective laser sintering
    • B29C64/10Processes of additive manufacturing
    • B29C64/106Processes of additive manufacturing using only liquids or viscous materials, e.g. depositing a continuous bead of viscous material
    • B29C64/118Processes of additive manufacturing using only liquids or viscous materials, e.g. depositing a continuous bead of viscous material using filamentary material being melted, e.g. fused deposition modelling [FDM]
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B29WORKING OF PLASTICS; WORKING OF SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE IN GENERAL
    • B29CSHAPING OR JOINING OF PLASTICS; SHAPING OF MATERIAL IN A PLASTIC STATE, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; AFTER-TREATMENT OF THE SHAPED PRODUCTS, e.g. REPAIRING
    • B29C64/00Additive manufacturing, i.e. manufacturing of three-dimensional [3D] objects by additive deposition, additive agglomeration or additive layering, e.g. by 3D printing, stereolithography or selective laser sintering
    • B29C64/30Auxiliary operations or equipment
    • B29C64/386Data acquisition or data processing for additive manufacturing
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B33ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
    • B33YADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, i.e. MANUFACTURING OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL [3-D] OBJECTS BY ADDITIVE DEPOSITION, ADDITIVE AGGLOMERATION OR ADDITIVE LAYERING, e.g. BY 3-D PRINTING, STEREOLITHOGRAPHY OR SELECTIVE LASER SINTERING
    • B33Y10/00Processes of additive manufacturing
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B33ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
    • B33YADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, i.e. MANUFACTURING OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL [3-D] OBJECTS BY ADDITIVE DEPOSITION, ADDITIVE AGGLOMERATION OR ADDITIVE LAYERING, e.g. BY 3-D PRINTING, STEREOLITHOGRAPHY OR SELECTIVE LASER SINTERING
    • B33Y50/00Data acquisition or data processing for additive manufacturing
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/10Geometric CAD
    • G06F30/12Geometric CAD characterised by design entry means specially adapted for CAD, e.g. graphical user interfaces [GUI] specially adapted for CAD
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20Design optimisation, verification or simulation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2119/00Details relating to the type or aim of the analysis or the optimisation
    • G06F2119/14Force analysis or force optimisation, e.g. static or dynamic forces

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)
  • Architecture (AREA)
  • Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
  • Computational Mathematics (AREA)
  • Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
  • Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
  • Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for quickly optimizing polylactic acid fused deposition molding process based on a double-index orthogonal test and a support vector machine, which comprises the following steps: determining process parameters, constructing a standard spline model and adjusting the process parameters, printing test splines by using an FDM printer and carrying out mechanical property test on the test splines, combining an orthogonal test with a support vector machine, establishing a printing product process parameter-mechanical property model, generating a large number of virtual samples, carrying out high-throughput screening, and rapidly forecasting the performance of a printing product. The method simply and quickly optimizes the parameters of the polylactic acid fused deposition molding process by using a machine learning modeling method, and avoids the problem that the optimal molding process parameter combination is difficult to obtain only by blind trial and error based on experience; based on reliable experimental data and a modeling method, the established fused deposition modeling process parameter-mechanical property forecasting model has the advantages of simplicity, convenience, rapidness, low cost and no pollution.

Description

Method for rapidly optimizing polylactic acid fused deposition molding process based on dual-index orthogonal test combined with support vector machine
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of process optimization of fused deposition molded products, in particular to a method for rapidly optimizing a polylactic acid fused deposition molding process based on a dual-index orthogonal test and a support vector machine.
Technical Field
Additive Manufacturing (AM) is an intelligent manufacturing technology that integrates a plurality of subjects such as electronics, software, machinery and materials. It has the advantages of rapid prototype design, high fidelity, reduced material consumption, etc. Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) is one of the mainstream additive manufacturing technologies, and has been widely applied to the fields of biomedical science, aerospace, national defense and military, instrument manufacturing, and the like. The current factors restricting the development of fused deposition modeling technology are not only modeling equipment and modeling materials, but also the influence of fused deposition modeling process parameters on the quality of printed products is a significant factor. Research shows that even if the same forming consumable material is used by the same FDM printer and printing is carried out under different forming process conditions, the mechanical property and the surface quality of the obtained product have obvious difference.
In recent years, research on parameters of the FDM forming process mainly focuses on the influence of parameters such as the lamination thickness, the bottom plate temperature, the nozzle temperature, the deposition mode, the printing speed and the like on single mechanical strength, and when the parameter change is ignored, synchronous change of various mechanical properties is ignored, and research on comprehensive mechanical properties is less. The multi-index orthogonal test is an important analysis method for researching multi-factor influence tests, can efficiently and economically find the influence of each factor, and more comprehensively and preferably selects the optimal test combination of comprehensive performance.
Polylactic acid (PLA) is taken as a mainstream consumable of FDM forming technology, has the advantages of high strength, high elastic modulus, good biocompatibility and the like, and the quality and the performance of a printed product of the PLA are widely concerned.
A Support Vector Machine (SVM) is a new machine learning method established by mathematician vladimirn, vapnik and the like on the basis of Statistical Learning Theory (SLT), and includes a Support Vector Classification (SVC) algorithm and a Support Vector Regression (SVR) algorithm. The method has a solid theoretical foundation, better analyzes the problems of 'overfitting' and 'underfitting', and provides a corresponding solution. The method provides a rich kernel function method, is particularly suitable for data modeling under the condition of a small sample set, and can improve the reliability of a forecast result to the maximum extent.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to overcome the blindness of a trial-and-error method of an experiment, and provides a method for quickly optimizing a polylactic acid fused deposition molding process based on a double-index orthogonal test combined with a support vector machine.
The purpose of the invention is realized by the following technical scheme:
a method for rapidly optimizing a polylactic acid fused deposition molding process based on a dual-index orthogonal test and a support vector machine comprises the following steps:
1) determining technological parameters:
determining technological parameters and horizontal numbers of fused deposition molding, and selecting a proper orthogonal test table;
2) constructing a standard spline model and adjusting process parameters:
designing a standard spline model by adopting a stretching and impacting spline standard and through CAD software; exporting the constructed mechanical property test spline model as a stl file, slicing by using Cura software, and adjusting process parameters according to an orthogonal test scheme;
3) and (3) printing a test sample strip by using an FDM printer and testing the mechanical property of the test sample strip:
after the parameters are adjusted, importing the set model data into an FDM printer for printing; after all test sample strips are printed, respectively testing the mechanical properties according to the standard, and recording the test results;
4) the orthogonal test is combined with a support vector machine to establish an FDM printing product process parameter-mechanical property model:
converting the process parameter data according to a formula, importing the converted process parameter data and the orthogonal test result into modeling software, and preparing for machine learning modeling; taking root mean square error and correlation coefficient obtained by cross validation of each model by one-out-of-one method as evaluation indexes, and establishing a polylactic acid fused deposition molding product process parameter-mechanical property model by using a support vector machine;
5) generating a large number of virtual samples, carrying out high-throughput screening, and rapidly forecasting the performance of a printed product:
a large number of virtual samples are automatically generated through programming, the virtual samples are put into a constructed relation model of process parameters and mechanical properties, high-throughput screening is carried out, and the mechanical properties of the FDM printed product under the process conditions are rapidly predicted.
In the step 2), the independent variables used for modeling are variables obtained by converting four process parameters through formula calculation, and the target variables are the tensile strength and the impact strength of the FDM printed product.
In the step 4), the polylactic acid fused deposition modeling product process parameters and mechanical property data for data conversion are obtained by designing a dual-index orthogonal test.
In the step 5), the high-throughput screening comprises the following steps:
5-1) the design conditions are as follows:
the range of the layering thickness is 0-0.4 mm, and the step length of the layering thickness is not more than 0.05 mm; the printing speed range is 30-90 mm/s, and the printing speed step length is not more than 5 mm/s; the printing temperature range is 190-220 ℃, and the printing temperature step length is not more than 5 ℃; the filling angle range is 0-45 degrees, the filling angle step is not more than 5 degrees, and a large number of virtual samples are generated by utilizing python programming;
5-2) putting a large number of generated virtual samples into the constructed prediction model, and outputting mechanical property prediction values under different process parameters;
5-3) selecting the process parameter combination with higher index value from the forecast result, and printing by utilizing the optimized process parameter combination as a high-throughput screening result.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the following obvious outstanding characteristics and obvious advantages:
1. the method simply and quickly optimizes the parameters of the polylactic acid fused deposition molding process by using a machine learning modeling method, thereby avoiding the problem that the optimal molding process parameter combination is difficult to obtain only by blind trial and error based on experience;
2. the method of the invention utilizes the double-index orthogonal test and the support vector machine to quickly predict the mechanical properties of the polylactic acid fused deposition molding product under different process conditions, the required test times are less, and the cost is low;
3. according to the method, the mechanical property of the FDM printed product printed under different process parameters is predicted in advance through model prediction, samples meeting requirements are selected for experimental verification, the efficiency of experiment is improved, a guiding effect is achieved, and the blindness of the experiment of a trial-and-error method is avoided.
Description of the drawings:
fig. 1 is a block diagram of the FDM printed article forming process optimization routine of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a leave-one-out cross-validation result of the regression model of the tensile strength support vector machine of the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a leave-one-out cross-validation result of the regression model of the impact strength support vector machine of the present invention.
FIG. 4 shows the results of high throughput screening of samples for tensile strength and impact strength under different process conditions.
The specific implementation mode is as follows:
the present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and examples.
The first embodiment is as follows:
referring to fig. 1, a method for rapidly optimizing a polylactic acid fused deposition modeling process based on a dual-index orthogonal test combined with a support vector machine comprises the following steps:
1) determining technological parameters:
determining technological parameters and horizontal numbers of fused deposition molding, and selecting a proper orthogonal test table;
2) constructing a standard spline model and adjusting process parameters:
designing a standard spline model by adopting a stretching and impacting spline standard and through CAD software; exporting the constructed mechanical property test spline model as a stl file, slicing by using Cura software, and adjusting process parameters according to an orthogonal test scheme;
3) and (3) printing a test sample strip by using an FDM printer and testing the mechanical property of the test sample strip:
after the parameters are adjusted, guiding the set spline model into an FDM printer for printing; after all test sample strips are printed, respectively testing the mechanical properties according to the standard, and recording the test results;
4) the orthogonal test is combined with a support vector machine to establish an FDM printing product process model:
converting the process parameter data according to a formula, importing the converted process parameter data and the orthogonal test result into modeling software, and preparing for machine learning modeling; taking root mean square error and correlation coefficient obtained by cross validation of each model by one-out-of-one method as evaluation indexes, and establishing a polylactic acid fused deposition molding product process parameter-mechanical property model by using a support vector machine;
5) generating a large number of virtual samples, carrying out high-throughput screening, and rapidly forecasting the performance of a printed product:
a large number of virtual samples are automatically generated through programming, the virtual samples are put into a constructed relation model of process parameters and mechanical properties, high-throughput screening is carried out, and the mechanical properties of the FDM printed product under the process conditions are rapidly predicted.
The method of the embodiment simply and quickly optimizes the parameters of the polylactic acid fused deposition molding process by using a machine learning modeling method, thereby avoiding the problem that the optimal molding process parameter combination is difficult to obtain only by blind trial and error based on experience.
The method of the embodiment utilizes the double-index orthogonal test and the support vector machine to quickly predict the mechanical properties of the polylactic acid fused deposition molding product under different process conditions, and has the advantages of less test times and low cost.
Example two:
this embodiment is substantially the same as the first embodiment, and is characterized in that:
referring to fig. 1, in said step 2), the independent variables used for modeling are variables after the four process parameters are formulaically converted, and the target variables are the tensile strength and impact strength of the FDM printed article.
In the step 4), the polylactic acid fused deposition modeling product process parameters and mechanical property data for data conversion are obtained by designing a dual-index orthogonal test.
In the step 5), the high-throughput screening comprises the following steps:
5-1) the design conditions are as follows:
the range of the layering thickness is 0-0.4 mm, and the step length of the layering thickness is not more than 0.05 mm; the printing speed range is 30-90 mm/s, and the printing speed step length is not more than 5 mm/s; the printing temperature range is 190-220 ℃, and the printing temperature step length is not more than 5 ℃; the filling angle range is 0-45 degrees, the filling angle step is not more than 5 degrees, and a large number of virtual samples are generated by utilizing python programming;
5-2) putting a large number of generated virtual samples into the constructed prediction model, and outputting mechanical property prediction values under different process parameters;
5-3) selecting the process parameter combination with higher index value from the forecast result, and printing by utilizing the optimized process parameter combination as a high-throughput screening result.
According to the embodiment, a large number of virtual samples are automatically generated through programming, the samples are put into a constructed relation model of process parameters and mechanical properties for high-throughput screening, and the mechanical properties of the printed product under the process conditions are rapidly predicted. The embodiment is based on reliable experimental data and a modeling method, and the established fused deposition modeling process parameter-mechanical property forecasting model has the advantages of simplicity, convenience, rapidness, low cost, no pollution and the like.
Example three:
this embodiment is substantially the same as the above embodiment, and is characterized in that:
in this embodiment, the method for rapidly optimizing the poly lactic acid fused deposition modeling process based on the orthogonal test and the support vector machine includes the following steps:
(1) in the optimization process of the fused deposition modeling process, a plurality of factors need to be examined, the included level of each factor is more than one, and if all the factor levels are matched with each other for testing, the number of required tests is extremely large, and a large amount of manpower and material resources are needed. Analytical statistical studies were performed on the results obtained. The orthogonal test can perform balanced sampling in a factor change interval, and a better test condition is found through a smaller number of test times, so that each test has certain representativeness and is more efficient and economical. Therefore, in the embodiment, the process parameters and the level number are determined according to the prior knowledge and the limitation of the existing equipment conditions, a proper orthogonal test table is selected, the factor level table is shown in table 1, and a four-factor four-level orthogonal test table is selected;
TABLE 1 factor horizon
Level of Thickness per mm of the layer Printing speed/(mm/s) Nozzle temperature/. degree.C Filling angle/°
1 0.1 30 190 45
2 0.2 50 200 30
3 0.3 70 210 15
4 0.4 90 220 0
(2) As the mechanical property is used as an evaluation index, the forming process parameters of FDM printing are optimized, so that the mechanical property test standard of molding and extrusion molding is referred. Designing a standard spline model by adopting GB/T1040.2-2006 tensile spline standard and GB/T9341-2000 impact spline standard through CAD software;
(3) exporting the constructed mechanical property test spline three-dimensional model as stl file, slicing by using Cura software and adjusting process parameters according to an orthogonal test scheme, wherein part of the test scheme is shown in Table 2;
TABLE 2 partial orthogonal test parameter setup protocol
Thickness per mm of the layer Printing speed/(mm/s) Nozzle temperature/. degree.C Filling angle-o
0.1 30 190 45
0.1 50 200 30
0.1 70 210 15
0.1 90 220 0
0.2 30 200 15
0.2 50 190 0
0.2 70 220 45
0.2 90 210 30
(4) After the parameters are adjusted, guiding the set spline model into an FDM printer for printing;
(5) after all test sample strips are printed, respectively testing the tensile strength and the notch impact strength according to GB/T1040.2-2006 and GB/T9341-2000 standards, and recording test results, wherein partial orthogonal test results are shown in Table 3;
TABLE 3 results of partial orthogonality test
Figure BDA0002643499340000061
Figure BDA0002643499340000071
(6) Converting the process parameter data according to a formula and the mechanical property value, wherein the partial data after the process parameter conversion is shown in a table 4;
6-1) for tensile strength, independent variable conversion is performed according to the following formula:
6-1-1) X1 ═ 5.020[ layer thickness ] -0.01027[ print speed ] +0.02890[ nozzle temperature ] +0.04068[ fill angle ] -4.969
6-1-2) X2 ═ 0.3523[ layered thickness ] -0.004580[ printing speed ] +0.07710[ nozzle temperature ] -0.02447[ filling angle ] -15.068
6-1-3) X3 ═ 4.093[ layer thickness ] -0.02656[ print speed ] +0.01938[ nozzle temperature ] +0.03336[ fill angle ] -2.107
6-1-4) X4 ═ 12.383[ layer thickness ] -0.02422[ printing speed ] +0.06698[ nozzle temperature ] +0.09386[ filling angle ] -11.294
6-2) for impact strength, independent variable conversion is performed according to the following formula:
6-2-1) X1 ═ 7.413[ layer thickness ] +0.009036[ printing speed ] -0.002103[ nozzle temperature ] +0.02727[ filling angle ] -2.578
6-2-2) X2 ═ 1.980[ layered thickness ] -0.01492[ printing speed ] -0.01036[ nozzle temperature ] -0.01549[ filling angle ] +2.872
6-2-3) X3 ═ 7.517[ layered thickness ] -0.008698[ printing speed ] -0.01657[ nozzle temperature ] -0.02289[ filling angle ] +6.314
6-2-4) X4 ═ 32.573[ split thickness ] -0.03536[ print speed ] +0.01070[ nozzle temperature ] -0.1165[ fill angle ] +10.6926-1-2) X2 ═ 0.3523[ split thickness ] -0.004580[ print speed ] +0.07710[ nozzle temperature ] -0.02447[ fill angle ] -15.068.
TABLE 4 partial data after conversion of Process parameters
X1 X2 X3 X4
1.542758 -1.622485 1.870475 3.69112
1.016285 -0.5760595 1.032795 2.468641
0.4898113 0.4703658 0.1951152 1.246161
-0.03666221 1.516791 -0.6425649 0.02368099
0.1094869 -0.08219375 0.6542746 0.306843
(7) Importing the converted process parameter data and the orthogonal test result into Expminer software developed in a laboratory, and preparing for machine learning modeling;
(8) respectively taking the tensile strength and the impact strength obtained by an orthogonal test as target variables, taking the variables obtained after the conversion of the four process parameters as independent variables, and establishing a relation model between the polylactic acid fused deposition molding process parameters and the mechanical properties by using a support vector machine;
(9) high-throughput screening: according to the two built prediction models of the mechanical properties and the generated process parameter virtual samples, rapidly optimizing the polylactic acid fused deposition modeling process parameters;
the high-throughput screening comprises the following specific steps:
9-1) the design conditions are as follows:
the range of the layering thickness is 0-0.4 mm, and the step length of the layering thickness is 0.05 mm; the printing speed range is 30-90 mm/s, and the printing speed step length is 5 mm/s; the printing temperature range is 190-220 ℃, and the printing temperature step length is 5 ℃; the filling angle range is 0-45 degrees, the filling angle step is 5 degrees, and a large number of virtual samples are generated by utilizing python programming;
9-2) putting a large number of generated virtual samples into the constructed prediction model, and outputting mechanical property prediction values under different process parameters;
9-3) selecting the process parameter combination with higher index value from the forecast result, and printing by utilizing the optimized process parameter combination as a high-throughput screening result.
Compared with the traditional trial-and-error experiment, the method has better directivity, and can greatly save the cost and time consumption when optimizing materials.
Example four:
this embodiment is substantially the same as the above embodiment, and is characterized in that:
in the present embodiment, the modeling result of the FDM printed product tensile strength quantitative prediction model established based on 16 fused deposition modeling orthogonal test data in combination with the support vector machine is shown in fig. 2.
In the embodiment, a support vector machine regression algorithm is adopted, variables obtained by converting four process parameters in a data set through a formula are used as independent variables, a linear kernel function is used as a modeling kernel function, and a relation model between the fused deposition modeling process parameters and the tensile strength is constructed. The model is obtained by the established leave-one-out modeling model: the predicted tensile strength correlated with the actual tensile strength found experimentally, R, to 0.77 with a root mean square error RMSE of 1.959.
Example five:
this embodiment is substantially the same as the above embodiment, and is characterized in that:
in the present embodiment, the modeling result of the FDM printed product impact strength quantitative prediction model established based on 16 fused deposition modeling orthogonal test data in combination with the support vector machine is shown in fig. 3.
In the embodiment, a support vector machine regression algorithm is adopted, variables obtained by converting four process parameters in a data set through a formula are used as independent variables, and a linear kernel function is used as a modeling kernel function, so that a relation model between fused deposition modeling process parameters and impact strength is constructed. The model is obtained by the established leave-one-out modeling model: the correlation coefficient R between the predicted impact strength and the experimentally measured impact strength reaches 0.90, and the root mean square error RMSE is 0.523.
Example six:
this embodiment is substantially the same as the above embodiment, and is characterized in that:
in this embodiment, based on two mechanical property models that have been constructed and a large number of virtual samples generated, high-throughput screening is performed, and the screening results of some samples are shown in fig. 4.
In this embodiment, 7280 generated virtual samples are put into the established model, the corresponding tensile strength and impact strength are predicted, and the process parameter combination with higher tensile strength and impact strength is selected to guide the experiment.
To sum up, the embodiment of the invention is based on a dual-index orthogonal test combined with a support vector machine to rapidly optimize the polylactic acid fused deposition molding process, and the method comprises the following steps: determining technological parameters: determining technological parameters and horizontal numbers of fused deposition molding, and selecting a proper orthogonal test table; constructing a standard spline model and adjusting process parameters: designing a standard spline model by adopting national stretching and impact spline standards and through CAD software; exporting the constructed mechanical property test spline model as a stl file, slicing by using Cura software and adjusting process parameters according to an orthogonal test scheme; and (3) printing a test sample strip by using an FDM printer and testing the mechanical property of the test sample strip: after the parameters are adjusted, guiding the set spline model into an FDM printer for printing; after all test sample strips are printed, respectively testing the mechanical properties according to the national standard, and recording the test results; and (3) establishing a product process model by combining an orthogonal test with a support vector machine: converting the process parameter data according to a formula, importing the converted process parameter data and the orthogonal test result into Expminer software developed in a laboratory, and preparing for machine learning modeling; taking root mean square error and correlation coefficient obtained by cross validation of each model by one-out-of-one method as evaluation indexes, and establishing a polylactic acid fused deposition molding product process parameter-mechanical property model by using a support vector machine; generating a large number of virtual samples, carrying out high-throughput screening, and rapidly forecasting the performance of a printed product: a large number of virtual samples are automatically generated through programming, the samples are put into a constructed relation model of process parameters and mechanical properties for high-throughput screening, and the mechanical properties of the printed product under the process conditions are quickly predicted. The embodiment is based on reliable experimental data and a modeling method, and the established fused deposition modeling process parameter-mechanical property forecasting model has the advantages of simplicity, convenience, rapidness, low cost and no pollution.
The embodiments of the present invention have been described with reference to the accompanying drawings, but the present invention is not limited to the embodiments, and various changes and modifications can be made according to the purpose of the invention, and any changes, modifications, substitutions, combinations or simplifications made according to the spirit and principle of the technical solution of the present invention shall be equivalent substitutions, as long as the purpose of the present invention is met, and the present invention shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention without departing from the technical principle and inventive concept of the present invention.

Claims (4)

1. A method for rapidly optimizing a polylactic acid fused deposition molding process based on a double-index orthogonal test and a support vector machine is characterized by comprising the following steps:
1) determining technological parameters:
determining technological parameters and horizontal numbers of fused deposition molding, and selecting a proper orthogonal test table;
2) constructing a standard spline model and adjusting process parameters:
designing a standard spline model by adopting a stretching and impacting spline standard and through CAD software; exporting the constructed mechanical property test spline model as a stl file, slicing by using Cura software, and adjusting process parameters according to an orthogonal test scheme;
3) and (3) printing a test sample strip by using an FDM printer and testing the mechanical property of the test sample strip:
after the parameters are adjusted, importing the set model data into an FDM printer for printing; after all test sample strips are printed, respectively testing the mechanical properties according to the standard, and recording the test results;
4) the orthogonal test is combined with a support vector machine to establish an FDM printing product process parameter-mechanical property model:
converting the process parameter data according to a formula, importing the converted process parameter data and the orthogonal test result into modeling software, and preparing for machine learning modeling; taking root mean square error and correlation coefficient obtained by cross validation of each model by one-out-of-one method as evaluation indexes, and establishing a polylactic acid fused deposition molding product process parameter-mechanical property model by using a support vector machine;
5) generating a large number of virtual samples, carrying out high-throughput screening, and rapidly forecasting the performance of a printed product:
a large number of virtual samples are automatically generated through programming, the virtual samples are put into a constructed relation model of process parameters and mechanical properties, high-throughput screening is carried out, and the mechanical properties of the FDM printed product under the process conditions are rapidly predicted.
2. The method for rapidly optimizing the poly (lactic acid) fused deposition modeling process based on the dual-index orthogonal test combined with the support vector machine as claimed in claim 1, wherein in the step 2), the independent variables used for modeling are variables obtained by converting four process parameters through formula calculation, and the target variables are the tensile strength and the impact strength of the FDM printed product.
3. The method for rapidly optimizing the poly (lactic acid) fused deposition modeling process based on the dual-index orthogonal test combined with the support vector machine as claimed in claim 1, wherein in the step 4), the process parameters and the mechanical property data of the poly (lactic acid) fused deposition modeling product for data transformation are obtained by designing the dual-index orthogonal test.
4. The method for rapidly optimizing the poly (lactic acid) fused deposition modeling process based on the dual-index orthogonal test combined with the support vector machine as claimed in claim 1, wherein in the step 5), the high-throughput screening comprises the following steps:
5-1) the design conditions are as follows:
the range of the layering thickness is 0-0.4 mm, and the step length of the layering thickness is not more than 0.05 mm; the printing speed range is 30-90 mm/s, and the printing speed step length is not more than 5 mm/s; the printing temperature range is 190-220 ℃, and the printing temperature step length is not more than 5 ℃; the filling angle range is 0-45 degrees, the filling angle step is not more than 5 degrees, and a large number of virtual samples are generated by utilizing python programming;
5-2) putting a large number of generated virtual samples into the constructed prediction model, and outputting mechanical property prediction values under different process parameters;
5-3) selecting the process parameter combination with higher index value from the forecast result, and printing by utilizing the optimized process parameter combination as a high-throughput screening result.
CN202010847263.1A 2020-08-21 2020-08-21 Method for rapidly optimizing polylactic acid fused deposition molding process based on dual-index orthogonal test combined with support vector machine Pending CN112172128A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010847263.1A CN112172128A (en) 2020-08-21 2020-08-21 Method for rapidly optimizing polylactic acid fused deposition molding process based on dual-index orthogonal test combined with support vector machine

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010847263.1A CN112172128A (en) 2020-08-21 2020-08-21 Method for rapidly optimizing polylactic acid fused deposition molding process based on dual-index orthogonal test combined with support vector machine

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN112172128A true CN112172128A (en) 2021-01-05

Family

ID=73924288

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202010847263.1A Pending CN112172128A (en) 2020-08-21 2020-08-21 Method for rapidly optimizing polylactic acid fused deposition molding process based on dual-index orthogonal test combined with support vector machine

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN112172128A (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113085169A (en) * 2021-04-01 2021-07-09 上海酷鹰机器人科技有限公司 3D printing forming method of spine corrector
CN113292332A (en) * 2021-06-11 2021-08-24 四川大学 Calcium phosphate ceramic high-throughput screening model based on 3D printing, preparation method and application
CN115195107A (en) * 2022-07-06 2022-10-18 嘉兴学院 High-viscosity hot melt electrohydrodynamic jet printing equipment and control method
CN115256938A (en) * 2022-07-22 2022-11-01 苏州铼新三维科技有限公司 Ideal radiation parameter testing method, system, 3D printing method and printing equipment
CN115415542A (en) * 2022-07-19 2022-12-02 闽都创新实验室 Method for predicting performance of duplex stainless steel 3D printing piece based on response surface method

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
产玉飞: "激光增材制造过程中对FeCr混粉中的Cr元素进行在线监测研究", 《应用激光》 *
吴炜等: "应用机器学习加速新材料的研发", 《中国科学:物理学 力学 天文学》 *
杨裕金等: "基于正交实验的熔融沉积成型工艺参数的优化", 《中国塑料》 *
陈念贻等: "优化建模技术和机器学习理论的新发展", 《计算机与应用化学》 *

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113085169A (en) * 2021-04-01 2021-07-09 上海酷鹰机器人科技有限公司 3D printing forming method of spine corrector
CN113292332A (en) * 2021-06-11 2021-08-24 四川大学 Calcium phosphate ceramic high-throughput screening model based on 3D printing, preparation method and application
CN115195107A (en) * 2022-07-06 2022-10-18 嘉兴学院 High-viscosity hot melt electrohydrodynamic jet printing equipment and control method
CN115415542A (en) * 2022-07-19 2022-12-02 闽都创新实验室 Method for predicting performance of duplex stainless steel 3D printing piece based on response surface method
CN115415542B (en) * 2022-07-19 2024-05-03 闽都创新实验室 Prediction method for performance of duplex stainless steel 3D printing piece based on response surface method
CN115256938A (en) * 2022-07-22 2022-11-01 苏州铼新三维科技有限公司 Ideal radiation parameter testing method, system, 3D printing method and printing equipment

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN112172128A (en) Method for rapidly optimizing polylactic acid fused deposition molding process based on dual-index orthogonal test combined with support vector machine
Wankhede et al. Experimental investigation of FDM process parameters using Taguchi analysis
Hofland et al. Correlation of process parameters with mechanical properties of laser sintered PA12 parts
Mohamed et al. Influence of processing parameters on creep and recovery behavior of FDM manufactured part using definitive screening design and ANN
Jain et al. Experimental investigations for improving part strength in selective laser sintering
CN109473147B (en) Method for rapidly predicting forbidden bandwidth of high polymer
EP4038620B1 (en) Method for producing thermoplastic compositions for mechanically and / or thermally loaded components
Hooda et al. Deposition angle prediction of Fused Deposition Modeling process using ensemble machine learning
CN110263488A (en) A kind of industrial Mooney Viscosity of Rubber Mix flexible measurement method based on integrated instant learning
CN117048022B (en) Extrusion optimization method and system for blending type interpenetrating network thermoplastic elastomer
Huynh et al. Effect of process parameters on mechanical strength of ffabricated parts using the fused deposition modelling method
CN106991074B (en) Accelerated degradation test optimization design method based on principle of acceleration factor invariance
CN115049127A (en) 3D printing quality prediction method based on BOHB algorithm and neural network
CN115936227A (en) Machine learning-based ion permeation power generation prediction system and method
Castillo et al. Scientometric analysis and systematic review of smart manufacturing technologies applied to the 3D printing polymer material extrusion system
Li et al. Status recognition for fused deposition modeling manufactured parts based on acoustic emission
CN116894379A (en) Injection molding quality optimization method
JP2020082389A (en) Information processor and program
CN115600453A (en) Numerical simulation method for reducing laser bending forming boundary effect of metal sheet
CN112749623B (en) Processing and feature extraction method and system for high-frequency sensor data of injection molding process
CN1699635A (en) Real-time control method in metal electrodeposition process based on neuron networks
CN117131788B (en) Optimized forming method and system for polymer plate
Schwicker et al. Strength Optimization and Strength Prediction of Fused Deposition Modelled Specimens Based on Process Parameters
CN1195975C (en) Method for determining polypropylene resin tensile yield strength
Gorana et al. Process parameter optimization for fabrication of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene parts

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20210105