CN112132545A - Evaluation system, information pushing method and device and electronic equipment - Google Patents
Evaluation system, information pushing method and device and electronic equipment Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN112132545A CN112132545A CN202011025926.8A CN202011025926A CN112132545A CN 112132545 A CN112132545 A CN 112132545A CN 202011025926 A CN202011025926 A CN 202011025926A CN 112132545 A CN112132545 A CN 112132545A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- information
- review
- file
- client
- applicant
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 84
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 48
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 191
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 claims description 34
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 claims description 34
- 238000013500 data storage Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 11
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000008676 import Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000013524 data verification Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004806 packaging method and process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002776 aggregation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004220 aggregation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013479 data entry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013502 data validation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012854 evaluation process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010365 information processing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003999 initiator Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012797 qualification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/10—File systems; File servers
- G06F16/18—File system types
- G06F16/182—Distributed file systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/25—Integrating or interfacing systems involving database management systems
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/06—Protocols specially adapted for file transfer, e.g. file transfer protocol [FTP]
Abstract
The application provides a review system, an information pushing method, an information pushing device and electronic equipment, wherein the system comprises: the applicant client is used for uploading the information to be evaluated and the applicant information to the server; the server is used for generating a state label, generating an original review file according to the state label, the information to be reviewed and the applicant information, and sending the original review file to the reviewer client; and the evaluation client is used for modifying the information to be evaluated according to the evaluation information, generating a feedback evaluation file and uploading the feedback evaluation file to the server. The method solves the problems that in the scoring scheme in the prior art, due to manual statistics, the workload is large, the scale of technical teams is large, the more the applicants are, the statistics is easy to generate, and the review is difficult after scoring by a judge, so that the scoring of a part of people is deviated, the correction is difficult, and the like.
Description
Technical Field
The application relates to the field of information processing, in particular to a review system, an information pushing method, an information pushing device and electronic equipment.
Background
At present, common evaluation processes are offline manual evaluation, evaluation results need to be manually collected and manually input into data storage equipment, and evaluation efficiency is low and error rate is high. Moreover, the existing scoring scheme has the problems that the manual counting is large in workload and large in scale of technical teams, the more the applicants are, the counting is easy to cause problems, and the review is difficult after scoring by a judge, so that the scoring of a part of people is deviated, the correction is difficult and the like. The scoring and summarizing results are not calculated in real time, and the scoring cannot be adjusted in real time by the commentator according to the report condition of the applicant.
Disclosure of Invention
An embodiment of the application aims to provide a review system, an information pushing method, an information pushing device and electronic equipment, so as to solve technical problems in the prior art.
In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a review system, including: the applicant client is used for uploading the information to be evaluated and the applicant information to the server; the server is used for generating a state label, generating an original review file according to the state label, the information to be reviewed and the applicant information in a packaging mode, and sending the original review file to the reviewer client; and the evaluation client is used for modifying the information to be evaluated according to the evaluation information, generating a feedback evaluation file and uploading the feedback evaluation file to the server.
In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides an information pushing method, including: receiving information to be evaluated and examined and applicant information uploaded by an applicant client; generating a state label, and generating an original review file according to the state label, the information to be reviewed and the applicant information; and sending the original evaluation file to the evaluation client.
In one embodiment, generating the status label and generating the original review file according to the status label, the information to be reviewed, and the applicant information includes: and establishing an original review file corresponding to the applicant information in the database according to the applicant information.
In one embodiment, before receiving a request for modification of the target review state from an applicant client, the method further comprises: acquiring an authentication identifier of an applicant client and an authentication identifier of a comment client; inquiring the authentication identification of the applicant client and the authentication identification of the appraiser client in a database; and if the authentication identification of the applicant client and the authentication identification of the appraiser client are inquired in the database, providing data interfaces for the applicant client and the appraiser client respectively.
In one embodiment, after receiving the feedback review file from the client of the commentator, the method further comprises: reading the feedback evaluation file and obtaining evaluation result information; judging whether the evaluation result information meets the preset data storage condition or not; if the evaluation result information does not accord with the preset data storage condition, modifying the state label; and re-sending the original review file and the modified status label to the reviewer client.
In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides an information pushing method, including: receiving an original review file from a server; modifying the information to be evaluated according to the evaluation information to generate a feedback evaluation file; and uploading the feedback review file to the server.
In one embodiment, the method further comprises: acquiring a state label according to the original review file; judging whether the modification authority of the original review file is modifiable or not according to a preset file modification rule corresponding to the state tag; and if the modification authority of the original review file is modifiable, obtaining review information.
In one embodiment, the status tag includes: prepared, reviewed, and/or finished; judging whether the modification authority of the original review file is modifiable according to a preset file modification rule corresponding to the state tag, wherein the judging step comprises the following steps: judging whether the state label is in the process of evaluation or not according to the state label; when the status tag is in review, the permissions of the original review file are marked as modifiable.
In an embodiment, after determining whether the modification authority of the original review file is modifiable according to the preset file modification rule corresponding to the status tag, the method further includes: and if the modification authority of the original review file is not modifiable, continuously receiving the state label from the server until the modification authority of the original review file is modifiable.
In a fourth aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides an information pushing apparatus, including: the first receiving module is used for receiving the information to be evaluated and the applicant information uploaded by the applicant client; the first generation module is used for generating a state label and generating an original review file according to the state label, the information to be reviewed and the applicant information; and the first sending module is used for sending the original review file to the reviewer client.
In one embodiment, the first generating module is further configured to create an original review file of corresponding applicant information in the database according to the applicant information.
In an embodiment, the information pushing apparatus further includes an identity authentication module, configured to: acquiring an authentication identifier of an applicant client and an authentication identifier of a client of a comment; inquiring the authentication identification of the applicant client and the authentication identification of the appraiser client in a database; and if the authentication identification of the applicant client and the authentication identification of the appraiser client are inquired in the database, providing data interfaces for the applicant client and the appraiser client respectively.
In an embodiment, the information pushing apparatus further includes a data verification module, configured to: reading the feedback evaluation file and obtaining evaluation result information; judging whether the evaluation result information meets the preset data storage condition or not; if the evaluation result information does not accord with the preset data storage condition, modifying the state label; and re-sending the original review file and the modified status label to the reviewer client.
In a fifth aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides an information pushing apparatus, including: the second receiving module is used for receiving the original review file from the server; the second generation module is used for modifying the information to be evaluated according to the evaluation information and generating a feedback evaluation file; and the second sending module is used for uploading the feedback review file to the server.
In one embodiment, the information pushing apparatus further includes: the first acquisition module is used for acquiring the state label according to the original review file; the first judgment module is used for judging whether the modification authority of the original review file is modifiable or not according to a preset file modification rule corresponding to the state tag; and the second acquisition module is used for acquiring the review information if the modification permission of the original review file is modifiable.
In one embodiment, the status tag includes: prepared, reviewed, and/or finished; the first judging module is further used for: judging whether the state label is in the process of evaluation or not according to the state label; when the tag status is in review, the permissions of the original review file are marked as modifiable. And if the modification authority of the original review file is not modifiable, continuously receiving the state label from the server until the modification authority of the original review file is modifiable.
In a sixth aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides an electronic device, including: a memory to store a computer program; a processor configured to perform the method according to the second aspect of the foregoing embodiments.
In a seventh aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides an electronic device, including: a memory to store a computer program; a processor configured to perform the method according to the third aspect of the foregoing embodiments.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present application, the drawings that are required to be used in the embodiments of the present application will be briefly described below, it should be understood that the following drawings only illustrate some embodiments of the present application and therefore should not be considered as limiting the scope, and that those skilled in the art can also obtain other related drawings based on the drawings without inventive efforts.
Fig. 1 is a schematic application scenario diagram of a review system according to an embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 2A is a schematic diagram of data interaction in an application scenario of the review system shown in FIG. 1;
FIG. 2B is a schematic diagram of a display interface at a server;
FIG. 2C is a schematic view of a review client display interface;
FIG. 2D is a schematic structural diagram of a review system provided in an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 3 is a schematic structural diagram of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
fig. 4 is a flowchart of an information pushing method according to an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 5 is a flowchart of another information pushing method provided in the embodiment of the present application;
fig. 6 is a flowchart of another information pushing method provided in the embodiment of the present application;
fig. 7 is a flowchart of another information pushing method provided in the embodiment of the present application;
fig. 8 is a structural diagram of an information pushing apparatus according to an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 9 is a structural diagram of an information pushing apparatus according to an embodiment of the present application.
Icon: the system comprises an electronic device 3, a bus 50, a processor 51, a memory 52, an applicant client 100, a server 200, a comment client 300, an information pushing device 800, a first receiving module 801, a first generating module 802, a first sending module 803, an identity authentication module 804, a data verification module 805, an information pushing device 900, a second receiving module 901, a first acquiring module 902, a first judging module 903, a second generating module 904, a second sending module 905 and a second acquiring module 906.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application will be described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present application.
Fig. 1 is a schematic view of an application scenario of a review system 1 according to an embodiment of the present application, in the application scenario, the review system 1 includes: an applicant client 100, a server 200 and a commentator client 300. The server 200, the applicant client 100 and the client 300 can transmit the configuration information in a wireless communication mode such as WIFI, 2.4G, 433M, GPRS (General Packet Radio Service) and the like, so that the server can set data sent to the client of the applicant according to the instruction of the client of the applicant.
The server 200 may be a server, a server cluster, or a cloud computing center. The applicant client 100 and the comment client 300 may be Personal Computers (PCs), tablet computers, smart phones, Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs), and the like, which are installed with application programs, and receive data transmitted from the server 200, and package and return external input data received locally to the server 200.
The applicant client is used for uploading the information to be evaluated and the applicant information to the server. The server is used for generating a state label, generating an original review file according to the state label, the information to be reviewed and the applicant information in a packaging mode, and sending the original review file to the reviewer client. The evaluation client is used for modifying the information to be evaluated according to the evaluation information, generating a feedback evaluation file and uploading the feedback evaluation file to the server.
In one embodiment, the applicant client, the server and the commentator client may be a personal computer, a tablet computer or a smart phone. The applicant client is provided with an application program which is used for providing the function of inputting the information to be evaluated and the function of inputting the information of the applicant for the applicant, and the function can provide interface service uploaded to the server by the service program.
The server receives the information to be evaluated and the applicant information from the applicant client by the interface service, and generates a review state label corresponding to the applicant after receiving the information to be evaluated and the applicant information. The status tab may be in review, ready to review, or end to review. The corresponding status label after the applicant uploads the information to be evaluated for the first time can be ready for evaluation, and the server packages the status label, the information to be evaluated and the applicant information to generate an original evaluation file and sends the original evaluation file to the evaluation client.
And after receiving the original evaluation file, the evaluation client opens the original evaluation file through the evaluation application program and displays the original evaluation file to the evaluation client. The review state at this time can be displayed according to the state tag, wherein the operation authority of the reviewer can be set according to the state tag, when the tag state is in review, the second terminal review client can modify the original review file, and after the tag is modified, a modifiable prompt can be sent to the outside.
Fig. 2A is a schematic diagram of data interaction in an application scenario of the review system 1 shown in fig. 1. The interaction process comprises the following steps:
step 201: and the applicant client sends the information to be evaluated and the applicant information to the server.
Step 202: the server generates an original review file.
Step 203: and the server sends the original evaluation file to the evaluation client.
Step 204: and the evaluation client generates a feedback evaluation file according to the evaluation information.
Step 205: and the evaluation client sends a feedback evaluation file to the server.
As shown in fig. 2B, after the applicant client sends the information to be evaluated and the applicant information to the Server in step 201, the Server may open a relevant page through a Web Server using a Web browser, where the information to be evaluated, the applicant information and the status tag may be displayed.
In one embodiment, after the review client sends the feedback review file to the server in step 205, the page may display the scoring by the review client according to the feedback review file.
As shown in FIG. 2C, after the Server sends the original review file to the client of the reviewer, the relevant page may be opened at the client of the reviewer using a Web browser through a Web Server service, step 203. The page may display applicant information and status tags.
Fig. 2D is a schematic structural diagram of a review system according to an embodiment of the present application, and the review system 1 includes: the system comprises a scoring system service module 21, a comment scoring module 22, a scoring summary module 23, a data import and export module 24, a database storage module 25 and a login module 26.
In one embodiment, the data storage module is used for storing various items of data used by the review system in the application scenario shown in fig. 1, and the data may include a list of applicants, such as names, mailboxes, application posts, and/or personal descriptions, that is, information of applicants for applicants to enter using the applicants client. The data may also include a list of the reviewers, such as name, mailbox, job title and/or login status, i.e. the path address the server uses to send to the client of the reviewer. The data may also include scoring dimensions, such as job ratings, and the proportion of each scoring detail. The data may also include the scoring results for each of the judges, such as the applicant's name, the name of the comment, individual latitude scoring details, personal login information, and system permissions information.
In one embodiment, the login module 26 may be a CAS login module, and the login module 26 is used for the review host and the reviewer login review system to access the scoring system by accessing the internal CAS login of the company.
In one embodiment, the scoring system service is a central service controller, a Web Server (Web Server) service is started by a review host, the host operates data entry and scoring summarization, and a review client opens a relevant page for scoring entry through the Web Server service by using a Web browser.
In an embodiment, the host may also be separately provided from the server, for example, the host side is included, and the host side can access the server and perform corresponding data operation and aggregation, which is not limited in this respect.
In one embodiment, the data import portion of the data import and export module 24 can be operated by the review host, and the import content includes personal data of the applicant, personal data of the reviewer, and dimension data of the score. And the data export part is operated and exported by a host, comprises the sorted scoring summary results and each scoring detail and is exported to be in an Excel spreadsheet format.
In one embodiment, the reviewer scoring module 22 is configured to display the applicant currently being scored and the score scored by the reviewer for the applicant, the status label is the original review document in the review, the client of the reviewer has the right to modify the scored score, and the server cannot score any more after locking the score. The moderator score summary module 23 presents the score of the reviewer in real time, and the score after the score is summarized. The scoring and summarizing module 23 can set and switch the review states of the applicant, which are respectively unexamined, being reviewed, reviewed and locked, only the review state can be scored, scoring messages are synchronously received and summarized by the scoring system service in real time, and the scoring system service pushes the state switching messages to each review party after the review states of the applicant are switched, thereby completing the two-way communication real-time scoring.
As shown in fig. 3, the present embodiment provides an electronic device 3 including: at least one processor 31 and a memory 32, one processor being exemplified in fig. 1. The processor 31 and the memory 32 are connected by a bus 30, and the memory 32 stores instructions executable by the processor 31 and the instructions are executed by the processor 31.
The Memory may be implemented by any type of volatile or non-volatile Memory device or combination thereof, such as Static Random Access Memory (SRAM), Electrically Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (EEPROM), Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory (EPROM), Programmable Read-Only Memory (PROM), Read-Only Memory (ROM), magnetic Memory, flash Memory, magnetic disk or optical disk.
Please refer to fig. 4, which is a flowchart illustrating an information pushing method according to an embodiment of the present application, where the method is executed by the electronic device 3 shown in fig. 3 and is used for the server in the interaction scenario shown in fig. 1. The method comprises the following steps:
step 401: and receiving the information to be evaluated and the applicant information uploaded by the applicant client.
In this step, the applicant client is an initiator of this information pushing, and the information to be evaluated may be reference data provided by the applicant, such as data on Performance aspects, such as working years, project experiences, KPI (Key Performance Indicator) indexes, OKR (Objectives and Key Results), and the like, or may be a quantifiable score or index of an individual Performance, which is not limited herein. The applicant information may be identification information such as an identification number that can be used to identify the applicant, e.g., an identification number such as an identification number of an identification card, a number of an employee, a number of a student, a number of a cell phone, etc.
Step 402: and generating a state label, and generating an original review file according to the state label, the information to be reviewed and the applicant information.
In this step, the applicant client selects the applicant to be sent to the comment client and modifies the status label of the applicant, or gives the applicant a status label, and sends the status label to the server. Status tags may include ready, in review, and/or finished. The readiness tag indicates that the original review file has been sent to the reviewer client, but that the original review file cannot be modified. The in-review status tag indicates that the original review file can be modified at the reviewer client. The finished state tag indicates that the original review file is restored to an unmodified state and has been returned to the database.
In one embodiment, the commentator uses a commentator client, and the server uses WebSocket two-way communication technology to push the applicant state to a commentator side page.
In one embodiment, the host operates the server, the server has a display interface, and the host sets the applicant status to be under review on the host page, so as to start a new round of applicant scoring and countdown, which may be different according to the level of each applicant application, and different voice prompts are given 10 minutes, 5 minutes and 1 minute before the countdown is finished.
Step 403: and sending the original evaluation file to the evaluation client.
In this step, the original review file is generated and then sent to the client of the reviewer, so that the client of the reviewer can review the file.
Please refer to fig. 5, which is a flowchart illustrating an information pushing method according to an embodiment of the present application, where the method is executed by the electronic device 3 shown in fig. 3 and is used for the server in the interaction scenario shown in fig. 1. The method comprises the following steps:
step 501: and acquiring the authentication identifier of the applicant client and the authentication identifier of the appraiser client.
In this step, before information push, the identity authentication is performed on the applicant client and the comment client. The authentication identifier is used for authenticating whether the applicant client and the comment client have legal login qualification.
Step 502: and inquiring the authentication identification of the applicant client and the authentication identification of the appraiser client in the database.
In this step, the database stores the authentication identifiers of the terminals that can be legally logged in. And if the inquiry authentication identification is legal, the inquiry authentication identification is illegal.
Step 503: data interfaces are provided to the applicant client and the commenter client, respectively.
In this step, if the authentication identifier of the applicant client and the authentication identifier of the client of the comment are found in the database, it is indicated that the information push is permitted by the applicant client and the client of the comment. And further establishing a data interface with the applicant client and the comment client, wherein the data interface is used for transmitting communication data.
Step 504: and receiving the information to be evaluated and the applicant information uploaded by the applicant client. Please refer to the description of step 401 in the above embodiment.
Step 505: and establishing an original review file corresponding to the applicant information in the database according to the applicant information.
In this step, an original review file corresponding to the applicant can be pre-established in the database, and the original review file can be a data set, a data table or a data packet which is allowed to be modified. The server can call the original review file corresponding to the identification code in the database through the identification code of the applicant.
In one embodiment, the original review file may be an EXCEL form, and the information to be reviewed may be quantified data, such as age, work load, development amount, sales, and the like.
Step 506: and sending the original evaluation file to the evaluation client. Please refer to the description of step 403 in the above embodiment.
Step 507: a feedback review file is received from the reviewer client. Please refer to the description of step 404 in the above embodiments.
Step 508: and reading the feedback evaluation file and obtaining evaluation result information.
In this step, the feedback review file includes review result information, which may be score, grade and/or not.
Step 509: and judging whether the evaluation result information meets the preset data storage condition or not. If yes, go to step 512, otherwise go to step 510.
In this step, the data saving condition may be a valid score preset in advance, such as a reserved digit one bit after a decimal point, and the like, and an invalid score such as 0.
Step 510: the status label is modified.
In this step, if the review result information does not meet the preset data storage condition, it indicates that the review result information is invalid, and it is necessary to obtain valid review result information again.
Step 511: and re-sending the original review file and the modified status label to the reviewer client.
In the step, the review result information is invalid, and the original review file and the modified state label are sent to the review client again to obtain the effective review result information.
Step 512: and storing the feedback review file to a database. Please refer to the description of step 405 in the above embodiments.
Please refer to fig. 6, which is a flowchart illustrating another information pushing method provided by an embodiment of the present application, which can be executed by the electronic device 3 shown in fig. 3 and used by the commentator client in the interaction scenario shown in fig. 1. The method comprises the following steps:
step 601: an original review file is received from a server.
In this step, the original review file may be a data set, a data table, or a data package that is allowed to be modified.
In one embodiment, the commentator uses a commentator client, and the server uses WebSocket two-way communication technology to push the applicant state to a commentator side page.
Step 602: and modifying the information to be evaluated according to the evaluation information to generate a feedback evaluation file.
In this step, the status tags in the original review file may include ready, in review, and/or finished. The readiness tag indicates that the original review file has been sent to the reviewer client, but that the original review file cannot be modified. The in-review status tag indicates that the original review file can be modified at the reviewer client. The finished state tag indicates that the original review file is restored to an unmodified state and has been returned to the database.
In one embodiment, the commentator uses a commentator client, and the server uses WebSocket two-way communication technology to push the applicant state to a commentator side page. And the evaluation side receives the status message, judges whether the score can be scored or not, and unlocks a scoring status button and a scoring input box if the score can be scored.
Step 603: and uploading the feedback review file to the server.
In this step, the feedback review file is sent to the server. The server receives information of the client of the commentator. Please refer to fig. 7, which is a flowchart illustrating another information pushing method provided by an embodiment of the present application, which can be executed by the electronic device 3 shown in fig. 3 and used by the commentator client in the interaction scenario shown in fig. 1. The method comprises the following steps:
step 701: an original review file is received from a server. Please refer to the description of step 601 in the above embodiment.
Step 702: and acquiring a state label according to the original review file.
In this step, whether the modification authority of the original review file is modifiable is judged according to the preset file modification rule corresponding to the state tag, and if the modification authority of the original review file is modifiable, review information is obtained.
Step 703: and judging whether the state label is under review or not according to the state label. If yes, go to step 704, otherwise go to step 705.
In this step, the status label may include ready, in review, and/or finished. The readiness tag indicates that the original review file has been sent to the reviewer client, but that the original review file cannot be modified. The in-review status tag indicates that the original review file can be modified at the reviewer client. The finished state tag indicates that the original review file is restored to an unmodified state and has been returned to the database.
Step 704: the rights of the original review file are marked as modifiable.
In this step, when the tag status is in the review, the comment client can modify the original review file, and after the tag is modified, a modifiable prompt can be sent to the outside.
Step 705: and continuing to receive the status label from the server until the modification authority of the original review file is modifiable.
In this step, if the modification authority of the original review file is not modifiable, it indicates that the reviewer client needs to wait for the modification authority of the original review file to be modifiable.
Step 706: and acquiring evaluation information.
Step 707: and writing the evaluation information into the original evaluation file to generate a feedback evaluation file.
In this step, the obtained review information is written into the original review file and is repackaged to generate a new feedback review file.
Step 708: and sending the feedback review file to the server.
In this step, the regenerated feedback review file is sent to the server.
Fig. 8 is a block diagram of an information pushing apparatus 800 according to an embodiment of the present application. As shown in fig. 8, the information pushing apparatus 800 is applicable to the electronic device 3 shown in fig. 3, and functions as the server 200 to realize that the server sets data sent to the client 300 of the comment according to the instruction of the client 100 of the applicant. The information pushing apparatus 800 includes: a first receiving module 801, a first generating module 802, a first sending module 803, an identity authentication module 804, and a data verification module 805. The specific principle is as follows:
the first receiving module 801 is configured to receive the information to be assessed and the applicant information uploaded by the applicant client. Please refer to the description of step 401 in the above embodiment.
The first generating module 802 is configured to generate a status label, and generate an original review file according to the status label, information to be reviewed, and applicant information. Please refer to the description of step 402 in the above embodiments.
A first sending module 803, configured to send the original review file to the reviewer client. Please refer to the description of step 403 in the above embodiment. An identity authentication module 804 to: the method comprises the steps of obtaining an authentication identification of an applicant client and an authentication identification of a comment client, inquiring the authentication identification of the applicant client and the authentication identification of the comment client in a database, and respectively providing data interfaces for the applicant client and the comment client if the authentication identification of the applicant client and the authentication identification of the comment client are inquired in the database. Please refer to the description of steps 501-503 in the above embodiments.
A data validation module 805 to: and reading the feedback evaluation file, obtaining evaluation result information, judging whether the evaluation result information accords with the data storage condition, if not, modifying the state label, and retransmitting the original evaluation file and the modified state label to the evaluation client. Please refer to the description of steps 508-512 in the above embodiments.
Fig. 9 is a block diagram of another information pushing apparatus 900 provided in the embodiment of the present application. As shown in fig. 9, the information pushing apparatus can be applied to the electronic device 3 shown in fig. 3, and serves as a client 300 of the commentator to receive data sent by the server 200 and package and return locally received external input data to the server 200. The information pushing apparatus 900 includes: a second receiving module 901, a first obtaining module 902, a first determining module 903, a second generating module 904, a second sending module 905, and a second obtaining module 906. The specific principle is as follows:
the second receiving module 901 is used for receiving the original review file from the server. Please refer to the description of step 601 in the above embodiment.
The first obtaining module 902 is configured to obtain a status label according to the original review file. Please refer to the description of step 702 in the above embodiments.
The first determining module 903 is configured to: judging whether the state label is in the process of evaluation or not according to the state label; when the tag status is in review, the permissions of the original review file are marked as modifiable.
In one embodiment, the status tag includes: in preparation, review, and/or finished, the first determination module 903 is further configured to: when the tag status is in review, the permissions of the original review file are marked as modifiable. And if the modification authority of the original review file is not modifiable, continuously receiving the state label from the server until the modification authority of the original review file is modifiable. Please refer to the description of steps 703-705 in the above embodiment.
The second generating module 904 is configured to modify the information to be reviewed according to the review information, and generate a feedback review file. Please refer to the description of step 602 in the above embodiments.
And a second sending module 905, configured to upload the feedback review file to the server. Please refer to the description of step 603 in the above embodiments.
A second obtaining module 906, configured to obtain the status label according to the original review file. Please refer to the description of step 702 in the above embodiments.
In the embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed apparatus and method may be implemented in other ways. The above-described embodiments of the apparatus are merely illustrative, and for example, a division of a unit is merely a division of one logic function, and there may be other divisions when actually implemented, and for example, a plurality of units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be omitted, or not executed. In addition, the shown or discussed mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection may be an indirect coupling or communication connection of devices or units through some communication interfaces, and may be in an electrical, mechanical or other form.
In addition, units described as separate parts may or may not be physically separate, and parts displayed as units may or may not be physical units, may be located in one place, or may be distributed on a plurality of network units. Some or all of the units can be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of the embodiment.
Furthermore, the functional modules in the embodiments of the present application may be integrated together to form an independent part, or each module may exist separately, or two or more modules may be integrated to form an independent part.
It should be noted that the functions, if implemented in the form of software functional modules and sold or used as independent products, may be stored in a computer readable storage medium. Based on such understanding, the technical solution of the present application or portions thereof that substantially contribute to the prior art may be embodied in the form of a software product stored in a storage medium and including instructions for causing a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a server, or a network device) to execute all or part of the steps of the method according to the embodiments of the present application. And the aforementioned storage medium includes: various media capable of storing program codes, such as a usb disk, a removable hard disk, a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a Random Access Memory (RAM), a magnetic disk, or an optical disk.
In this document, relational terms such as first and second, and the like may be used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions.
The above embodiments are merely examples of the present application and are not intended to limit the scope of the present application, and various modifications and changes may be made by those skilled in the art. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement and the like made within the spirit and principle of the present application shall be included in the protection scope of the present application.
Claims (13)
1. A review system, comprising:
the applicant client is used for uploading the information to be evaluated and the applicant information to the server;
the server is used for generating a state label, generating an original review file according to the state label, the information to be reviewed and the applicant information, and sending the original review file to a reviewer client;
and the evaluation client is used for modifying the information to be evaluated according to the evaluation information, generating a feedback evaluation file and uploading the feedback evaluation file to the server.
2. An information pushing method applied to the review system of claim 1, the method comprising:
receiving information to be evaluated and examined and applicant information uploaded by an applicant client;
generating a state label, and generating an original review file according to the state label, the information to be reviewed and the applicant information;
and sending the original evaluation file to a client of the evaluation.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein generating a status label and generating an original review document based on the status label, review information and applicant information comprises:
establishing an original review file corresponding to the applicant information in a database according to the applicant information;
and writing the information to be evaluated into the original evaluation file.
4. The method of claim 2, further comprising, prior to receiving the review pending information and the applicant information uploaded by the applicant client:
acquiring the authentication identification of the applicant client and the authentication identification of the comment client;
inquiring the authentication identification of the applicant client and the authentication identification of the comment client in a database;
and if the authentication identifier of the applicant client and the authentication identifier of the appraiser client are inquired in the database, respectively providing data interfaces for the applicant client and the appraiser client.
5. The method of claim 4, further comprising, after receiving the feedback review file from the reviewer client:
reading the feedback evaluation file and acquiring evaluation result information;
judging whether the evaluation result information meets the preset data storage condition or not;
if the review result information does not accord with the preset data storage condition, modifying the state label;
and resending the original review file and the modified status label to a reviewer client.
6. An information pushing method applied to the review system of claim 1, the method comprising:
receiving an original review file from a server;
modifying the information to be evaluated according to the evaluation information to generate a feedback evaluation file;
and uploading the feedback review file to the server.
7. The method of claim 6, before modifying the information to be reviewed according to the review information to generate a feedback review file, further comprising:
acquiring the state label according to the original review file;
judging whether the modification authority of the original review file is modifiable or not according to a preset file modification rule corresponding to the state tag;
and if the modification authority of the original review file is modifiable, obtaining review information.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the status tag comprises: prepared, reviewed, and/or finished; the step of judging whether the modification authority of the original review file is modifiable according to the preset file modification rule corresponding to the state tag comprises the following steps:
judging whether the state label is under review according to the state label;
when the status tag is in review, the permissions of the original review file are marked as modifiable.
9. The method according to claim 8, wherein after determining whether the modification permission of the original review file is modifiable according to the preset file modification rule corresponding to the status tag, the method further comprises:
and if the modification authority of the original review file is not modifiable, continuously receiving the state label from the server until the modification authority of the original review file is modifiable.
10. An information pushing apparatus applied to the review system of claim 1, the apparatus comprising:
the first receiving module is used for receiving the information to be evaluated and the applicant information uploaded by the applicant client;
the first generation module is used for generating a state label and generating an original review file according to the state label, the information to be reviewed and the applicant information;
and the first sending module is used for sending the original review file to a client of a reviewer.
11. An information pushing apparatus applied to the review system of claim 1, the apparatus comprising:
the second receiving module is used for receiving the original review file from the server;
the second generation module is used for modifying the information to be evaluated according to the evaluation information and generating a feedback evaluation file;
and the second sending module is used for uploading the feedback review file to the server.
12. An electronic device, applied to the review system of claim 1, comprising:
a memory to store a computer program;
a processor to perform the method of any one of claims 2 to 5.
13. An electronic device, applied to the review system of claim 1, comprising:
a memory to store a computer program;
a processor to perform the method of any one of claims 6 to 9.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202011025926.8A CN112132545A (en) | 2020-09-25 | 2020-09-25 | Evaluation system, information pushing method and device and electronic equipment |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202011025926.8A CN112132545A (en) | 2020-09-25 | 2020-09-25 | Evaluation system, information pushing method and device and electronic equipment |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN112132545A true CN112132545A (en) | 2020-12-25 |
Family
ID=73840192
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202011025926.8A Pending CN112132545A (en) | 2020-09-25 | 2020-09-25 | Evaluation system, information pushing method and device and electronic equipment |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN112132545A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112598397A (en) * | 2020-12-30 | 2021-04-02 | 北京迪浩永辉技术有限公司 | Circuit design online evaluation method, system, medium, equipment, terminal and application |
Citations (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102480466A (en) * | 2010-11-24 | 2012-05-30 | 鸿富锦精密工业（深圳）有限公司 | Electronic pre-evaluating method for work publishment |
| CN105260875A (en) * | 2015-09-16 | 2016-01-20 | 国网山东省电力公司经济技术研究院 | Electric power engineering project evaluation system |
| CN105719070A (en) * | 2016-01-18 | 2016-06-29 | 四川建设网有限责任公司 | Electronic auxiliary reviewing method and system |
| CN105930961A (en) * | 2016-04-15 | 2016-09-07 | 深圳市金域文化传播有限公司 | Appraisal management method and device |
| CN107256586A (en) * | 2017-05-19 | 2017-10-17 | 深圳新闻网传媒股份有限公司 | Multimedia platform reviewing method, device and computer-readable storage medium |
| CN107274142A (en) * | 2017-04-27 | 2017-10-20 | 深圳市前海七号网络科技有限公司 | File reviewing method and device |
| CN111275407A (en) * | 2020-02-14 | 2020-06-12 | 江苏满运软件科技有限公司 | Security requirement evaluation method, system, equipment and storage medium |
-
2020
- 2020-09-25 CN CN202011025926.8A patent/CN112132545A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102480466A (en) * | 2010-11-24 | 2012-05-30 | 鸿富锦精密工业（深圳）有限公司 | Electronic pre-evaluating method for work publishment |
| CN105260875A (en) * | 2015-09-16 | 2016-01-20 | 国网山东省电力公司经济技术研究院 | Electric power engineering project evaluation system |
| CN105719070A (en) * | 2016-01-18 | 2016-06-29 | 四川建设网有限责任公司 | Electronic auxiliary reviewing method and system |
| CN105930961A (en) * | 2016-04-15 | 2016-09-07 | 深圳市金域文化传播有限公司 | Appraisal management method and device |
| CN107274142A (en) * | 2017-04-27 | 2017-10-20 | 深圳市前海七号网络科技有限公司 | File reviewing method and device |
| CN107256586A (en) * | 2017-05-19 | 2017-10-17 | 深圳新闻网传媒股份有限公司 | Multimedia platform reviewing method, device and computer-readable storage medium |
| CN111275407A (en) * | 2020-02-14 | 2020-06-12 | 江苏满运软件科技有限公司 | Security requirement evaluation method, system, equipment and storage medium |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112598397A (en) * | 2020-12-30 | 2021-04-02 | 北京迪浩永辉技术有限公司 | Circuit design online evaluation method, system, medium, equipment, terminal and application |
| CN112598397B (en) * | 2020-12-30 | 2024-01-05 | 北京迪浩永辉技术有限公司 | Circuit design on-line review method, system, medium, equipment, terminal and application |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| EP3859644B1 (en) | Block chain-based data check system and method, computing device, and storage medium | |
| WO2017028630A1 (en) | Verification method and server | |
| WO2019200756A1 (en) | Data examination and approval method and apparatus, computer device and storage medium | |
| CN109474578A (en) | Message method of calibration, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110909013A (en) | Service list generation method, device, equipment and computer readable storage medium | |
| CN110222323A (en) | A kind of voucher generation method, device, readable storage medium storing program for executing and terminal device | |
| CN103457802A (en) | Information transmission system and method | |
| CN107133233B (en) | Processing method and device for configuration data query | |
| CN114549015A (en) | Commodity tracing method, commodity tracing device, commodity tracing equipment and computer readable storage medium | |
| CN112184426A (en) | Data sharing method, system, server and computer readable storage medium | |
| CN112631884A (en) | Pressure measurement method and device based on data synchronization, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN112631924A (en) | Automatic testing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN112328486A (en) | Interface automation test method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN112132545A (en) | Evaluation system, information pushing method and device and electronic equipment | |
| CN117032634A (en) | Component processing method and system | |
| CN108694499B (en) | Online borrowing management system and method for electronic equipment | |
| CN114048718A (en) | Table data processing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN111901299A (en) | Application authentication method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN112085611A (en) | Asynchronous data verification method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN112418944A (en) | Coupon transfer method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN112597210A (en) | Data summarizing method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN112070470A (en) | Annual report reporting method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN116720773B (en) | Bid-inviting method and device based on block bid evaluation | |
| CN110889763A (en) | Financial management system based on big data | |
| KR20080072010A (en) | Representing business transactions |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |