CN111924331A - Method and system for optimizing vertical bracket structure in steel coil transportation and standing process - Google Patents

Method and system for optimizing vertical bracket structure in steel coil transportation and standing process Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN111924331A
CN111924331A CN202010683847.XA CN202010683847A CN111924331A CN 111924331 A CN111924331 A CN 111924331A CN 202010683847 A CN202010683847 A CN 202010683847A CN 111924331 A CN111924331 A CN 111924331A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
bending stress
maximum
compared
panel
stage
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN202010683847.XA
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN111924331B (en
Inventor
白振华
顾清
张文军
林威
李学通
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Yanshan University
Original Assignee
Yanshan University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Yanshan University filed Critical Yanshan University
Priority to CN202010683847.XA priority Critical patent/CN111924331B/en
Publication of CN111924331A publication Critical patent/CN111924331A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN111924331B publication Critical patent/CN111924331B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65D—CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
    • B65D79/00—Kinds or details of packages, not otherwise provided for
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65D—CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
    • B65D85/00—Containers, packaging elements or packages, specially adapted for particular articles or materials
    • B65D85/66—Containers, packaging elements or packages, specially adapted for particular articles or materials for jumbo rolls; for rolls of floor covering
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65D—CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
    • B65D85/00—Containers, packaging elements or packages, specially adapted for particular articles or materials
    • B65D85/67—Containers, packaging elements or packages, specially adapted for particular articles or materials for web or tape-like material
    • B65D85/671—Containers, packaging elements or packages, specially adapted for particular articles or materials for web or tape-like material wound in flat spiral form

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Bending Of Plates, Rods, And Pipes (AREA)

Abstract

The invention provides a method and a system for optimizing a vertical bracket structure in steel coil transportation and standing processes, wherein the method comprises the following steps: judging whether the side plate bearing of the vertical bracket structure meets the requirements or not; if the side plate load bearing of the vertical bracket structure does not meet the requirement, "optimizing the vertical bracket structure"; if the requirements are met, no processing is needed; judging whether the bearing of the middle plate of the vertical bracket structure meets the requirement or not; if the bearing of the middle plate of the vertical bracket structure does not meet the requirement, optimizing the vertical bracket structure; if the load bearing of the middle plate of the vertical bracket structure meets the requirement, no treatment is needed. The invention combines the stress and deformation conditions of the vertical bracket under different bearing conditions to realize the optimization of the weak part of the vertical bracket structure in the steel coil transportation and standing process.

Description

Method and system for optimizing vertical bracket structure in steel coil transportation and standing process
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of vertical bracket structure optimization, in particular to a method and a system for optimizing a vertical bracket structure in steel coil transportation and standing processes.
Background
With the increasingly intense market competition in the steel industry, the quality and efficiency of steel coil transportation, packaging and stacking are urgently required to be improved while the steel coil yield rises year by year. The vertical bracket is used for the steel coil transportation and standing process, and the quality of the steel coil is protected from being damaged in the logistics transportation process. The solid wood vertical bracket is formed by splicing a panel and skids as a platform device borne by a unit, and the number of the skids and the area of the panel are determined by the quality and the area of goods. The structural and dimensional design of the vertical bracket is imperfect, and the bracket is bent and deformed, so that economic loss and safety accidents of enterprises are caused, and how to optimize the structure of the vertical bracket in the transportation and standing processes becomes a technical problem to be solved in the field.
Disclosure of Invention
Based on the above, the invention aims to provide a method and a system for optimizing the vertical bracket structure in the steel coil transportation and standing process, so as to optimize the vertical bracket structure in the steel coil transportation and standing process.
In order to achieve the above object, the present invention provides a method for optimizing a vertical bracket structure used in a steel coil transportation and standing process, the method comprising:
step S1: judging whether the side plate bearing of the vertical bracket structure meets the requirements or not; if the side plate load bearing of the vertical bracket structure does not meet the requirement, executing step S3; if the requirements are met, no processing is needed;
step S2: judging whether the bearing of the middle plate of the vertical bracket structure meets the requirement or not; if the load of the middle plate of the vertical bracket structure does not meet the requirement, executing the step S3; if the bearing of the middle plate of the vertical bracket structure meets the requirement, the middle plate does not need to be processed;
step S3: the vertical bracket structure is optimized.
Optionally, the step S1 includes:
dividing the side plate of the vertical bracket structure into two stages; the first stage is y e (0, f)2(xi)]The second stage is
Figure BDA0002586779080000011
Wherein y represents the ordinate of the coil of steel, f2(xi) For critical parameter values determined from the divided regions, LbcRepresenting a panel span;
determining the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first stage and the maximum bending stress corresponding to the second stage;
selecting the largest one of the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first stage and the maximum bending stress corresponding to the second stage as a first bending stress to be compared;
judging whether the first bending stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the static bending strength of the panel or not; if the first bending stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the static bending strength of the panel, executing step S3; if the first bending stress to be compared is smaller than the static bending strength of the panel, no operation is needed.
Optionally, the step S1 further includes:
calculating the maximum compressive stress corresponding to the first stage and the maximum compressive stress corresponding to the second stage;
selecting the largest one of the maximum compressive stress corresponding to the first stage and the maximum compressive stress corresponding to the second stage as the compressive stress to be compared;
judging whether the compressive stress to be compared is greater than or equal to an allowable compressive stress, and executing the step S3 if the compressive stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the allowable compressive stress; and if the compressive stress to be compared is less than the allowable compressive stress, no treatment is needed.
Optionally, the step S2 includes:
according to the symmetry principle, the quarter part of the middle plate is subjected to region division in the width direction to obtain a first region, a second region and a third region respectively;
determining the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first region, the maximum bending stress corresponding to the second region and the maximum bending stress corresponding to the third region;
selecting the largest one of the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first region, the maximum bending stress corresponding to the second region and the maximum bending stress corresponding to the third region as a second bending stress to be compared;
judging whether the second bending stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the static bending strength of the panel or not; if the second bending stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the static bending strength of the panel, executing step S3; if the second bending stress to be compared is smaller than the static bending strength of the panel, no treatment is needed.
Optionally, the step S3 includes:
gluing and sealing the binding tape of the plywood, and changing the notches of the side plates and the notches of the middle plate from right angles to round angles;
and designing a protective edge for the panel extension side plate, packaging the part exceeding the pad foot, and assembling the packaged protective edge on the middle plate by using a nail gun.
The invention also provides a system for optimizing the structure of the vertical bracket in the steel coil transportation and standing process, which comprises the following steps:
the first judgment module is used for judging whether the side plate bearing of the vertical bracket structure meets the requirement or not; if the side plate load bearing of the vertical bracket structure does not meet the requirement, executing an 'optimization module'; if the requirements are met, no processing is needed;
the second judging module is used for judging whether the bearing of the middle plate of the vertical bracket structure meets the requirement or not; if the bearing of the middle plate of the vertical bracket structure does not meet the requirement, executing an optimization module; if the bearing of the middle plate of the vertical bracket structure meets the requirement, the middle plate does not need to be processed;
an optimization module for optimizing the vertical bracket structure.
Optionally, the first determining module includes:
dividing the side plate of the vertical bracket structure into two stages; the first stage is y e (0, f)2(xi)]The second stage is
Figure BDA0002586779080000031
Wherein y represents the ordinate of the coil of steel, f2(xi) For critical parameter values determined from the divided regions, LbcRepresenting a panel span;
the first maximum bending stress determining unit is used for determining the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first stage and the maximum bending stress corresponding to the second stage;
the first bending stress to be compared determining unit is used for selecting the largest one of the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first stage and the maximum bending stress corresponding to the second stage as the first bending stress to be compared;
the first judging unit is used for judging whether the first bending stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the static bending strength of the panel or not; if the first bending stress to be compared is larger than or equal to the static bending strength of the panel, executing an optimization module; if the first bending stress to be compared is smaller than the static bending strength of the panel, no operation is needed.
Optionally, the first determining module further includes:
the maximum compressive stress determining unit is used for calculating the maximum compressive stress corresponding to the first stage and the maximum compressive stress corresponding to the second stage;
the to-be-compared compressive stress determining unit is used for selecting the largest one of the maximum compressive stress corresponding to the first stage and the maximum compressive stress corresponding to the second stage as the to-be-compared compressive stress;
a second judging unit, configured to judge whether the compressive stress to be compared is greater than or equal to an allowable compressive stress, and if the compressive stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the allowable compressive stress, execute an "optimization module"; and if the compressive stress to be compared is less than the allowable compressive stress, no treatment is needed.
Optionally, the second determining module includes:
the area dividing unit is used for dividing the quarter part of the middle plate in the width direction according to the symmetry principle to respectively obtain a first area, a second area and a third area;
the second maximum bending stress determining unit is used for determining the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first region, the maximum bending stress corresponding to the second region and the maximum bending stress corresponding to the third region;
the second bending stress determining unit is used for selecting the largest one of the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first region, the maximum bending stress corresponding to the second region and the maximum bending stress corresponding to the third region as a second bending stress to be compared;
the third judging unit is used for judging whether the second bending stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the static bending strength of the panel; if the second bending stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the static bending strength of the panel, executing an optimization module; if the second bending stress to be compared is smaller than the static bending strength of the panel, no treatment is needed.
Optionally, the optimization module comprises:
the gluing and sealing module is used for gluing and sealing the binding belt of the plywood and changing the notches of the side plates and the notches of the middle plate from right angles to round angles;
and the packaging module is used for designing a protective edge for the panel extension side plate, packaging the part exceeding the foot pad and assembling the packaged protective edge on the middle plate by using a nail gun.
According to the specific embodiment provided by the invention, the invention discloses the following technical effects:
the invention provides a method and a system for optimizing a vertical bracket structure in steel coil transportation and standing processes, wherein the method comprises the following steps: judging whether the side plate bearing of the vertical bracket structure meets the requirements or not; if the side plate load bearing of the vertical bracket structure does not meet the requirement, "optimizing the vertical bracket structure"; if the requirements are met, no processing is needed; judging whether the bearing of the middle plate of the vertical bracket structure meets the requirement or not; if the bearing of the middle plate of the vertical bracket structure does not meet the requirement, optimizing the vertical bracket structure; if the load bearing of the middle plate of the vertical bracket structure meets the requirement, no treatment is needed. The invention combines the stress and deformation conditions of the vertical bracket under different bearing conditions to realize the optimization of the weak part of the vertical bracket structure in the steel coil transportation and standing process.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings needed to be used in the embodiments will be briefly described below, and it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious for those skilled in the art to obtain other drawings without inventive exercise.
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method for optimizing a vertical bracket structure in a steel coil transportation and standing process according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of the force applied to the side plate of the vertical bracket according to the embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an exemplary edge plate force model;
FIG. 4 is a simplified diagram of the edge plate under stress according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating a force applied to a middle plate of the vertical bracket according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 6 is a schematic view of a force-bearing area of a plate according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram illustrating the division of the stress area of the plate according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 8 is a chamfer for preventing cracking at the notch of the side plate according to the embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 9 is an anti-crack chamfer at a slot of a plate in an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 10 is a schematic view of an embodiment of a protective edge of the present invention;
FIG. 11 is a schematic view of an assembled middle plate of the edge protector according to the embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 12 is a structural diagram of an optimization system for a vertical bracket structure in the steel coil transportation and standing process according to an embodiment of the invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
The invention aims to provide a method and a system for optimizing a vertical bracket structure in steel coil transportation and standing processes, so as to optimize the vertical bracket structure in the steel coil transportation and standing processes.
In order to make the aforementioned objects, features and advantages of the present invention comprehensible, embodiments accompanied with figures are described in further detail below.
Example 1:
as shown in fig. 1, the present invention provides a method for optimizing a vertical bracket structure used in a steel coil transportation and standing process, the method comprising:
step S1: judging whether the side plate bearing of the vertical bracket structure meets the requirements or not; if the side plate load bearing of the vertical bracket structure does not meet the requirement, executing step S3; if the requirements are met, no processing is required.
Step S2: judging whether the bearing of the middle plate of the vertical bracket structure meets the requirement or not; if the load of the middle plate of the vertical bracket structure does not meet the requirement, executing the step S3; if the load bearing of the middle plate of the vertical bracket structure meets the requirement, no treatment is needed.
Step S3: the vertical bracket structure is optimized.
The individual steps are discussed in detail below:
when the steel coil is not biased, the stress condition of the side plate is as shown in fig. 2, and a typical stress model of the simply supported beam is obtained in a simplified mode as shown in fig. 3. As can be seen from fig. 3, the side plates are of a symmetrical structure when the steel coil is not biased, so that half of the side plate structure is considered when the stress model is built, as shown in fig. 4.
The step S1 includes:
step S11: dividing the side plate of the vertical bracket structure into two stages; the first stage is y e (0, f)2(xi)]The second stage is
Figure BDA0002586779080000061
Wherein y represents the ordinate of the coil of steel, f2(xi) For critical parameter values determined from the divided regions, LbcRepresenting the panel span.
Step S12: determining the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first stage and the maximum bending stress corresponding to the second stage; the method specifically comprises the following steps:
step S121: determining the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first stage, specifically comprising:
when the steel coil is not biased, a load distribution model of the steel coil is constructed, and the specific formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002586779080000062
wherein f is1(x, y) represents a model of the load distribution of the steel coil, (x)0,y0) Representing the center coordinate, R, of the steel coil in the current coordinate systemgThe outer diameter of the steel coil is shown, and the (x, y) represents the coordinate of the steel coil.
Coordinate transformation is carried out on the load distribution model to obtain a new load distribution model f2(x)。
According to the steel coil weight and the total stressed area of the panel, uniformly distributed loads are determined, and the concrete formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002586779080000063
wherein q ismIndicating uniform load, MGRepresents the coil weight, SzRepresenting the total area of the panel under force.
Determining the side plate load distribution value according to the uniformly distributed load and the new load distribution model, wherein the specific formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002586779080000071
wherein, F2(xi) Representing the sideboard load distribution value, q, of a selected divided areamDenotes the uniform load, xiIndicating an upper limit of an abscissa value, L, in the divided regionbcRepresenting the span of the panel, f2(x) Representing a new load distribution model.
Determining the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first stage according to the side plate load distribution value of the selected divided area, wherein the specific formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002586779080000072
wherein, W2i1(xiY) represents the bending moment corresponding to the first stage, xiRepresenting the upper limit of the abscissa value in the divided region, y representing the ordinate of the coil of steel, F2(xi) For the edge plate load distribution value, σ, of the selected division areaw1maxThe maximum bending stress corresponding to the first stage is shown, b is the panel equal division width, h is the panel height, f is2(xi) Is a critical parameter value determined according to the divided region.
Step S122: determining the maximum bending stress corresponding to the second stage, wherein the specific formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002586779080000073
wherein, W2i2(xiY) represents the bending moment corresponding to the second stage, y represents the ordinate of the steel coil, and xiRepresenting an upper limit of an abscissa value, F, in the divided region2(xi) Representing the sideboard load distribution value, q, of a selected divided areamRepresenting the uniform load, b representing the panel equal width, f2(xi) For critical parameter values determined from the divided regions, σw2maxRepresents the maximum bending stress, L, corresponding to the second stagebcRepresenting the panel span and h representing the panel height.
Step S13: and selecting the largest one of the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first stage and the maximum bending stress corresponding to the second stage as a first bending stress to be compared.
Step S14: judging whether the first bending stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the static bending strength of the panel or not; if the first bending stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the static bending strength of the panel, the side plate bearing does not meet the requirement, and step S3 is executed; and if the first bending stress to be compared is smaller than the static bending strength of the panel, the side plate is indicated to bear the weight to meet the requirement, and operation is not needed. The bending strength of the panel in the invention is determined according to the material of the panel.
Step S15: calculating the maximum compressive stress corresponding to the first stage and the maximum compressive stress corresponding to the second stage according to a specific formula:
step S151: calculating the maximum pressure stress corresponding to the first stage, wherein the specific formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002586779080000081
wherein σy1maxThe maximum compressive stress corresponding to the first stage is shown, x represents the abscissa of the steel coil, y represents the ordinate of the steel coil, and xiRepresenting an upper limit of an abscissa value, x, in the divided regioni-1Indicating a lower limit of an abscissa value, f, in the divided region2(xi) Representing a critical parameter value determined from the divided area, qmThe uniform load is expressed, b represents the panel equal dividing width, h represents the panel height, and f (x, y) is the final outline curve equation of the steel coil.
Step S152: calculating the maximum compressive stress corresponding to the second stage, wherein the specific formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002586779080000082
wherein σy2maxThe maximum compressive stress corresponding to the second stage is shown, x represents the abscissa of the steel coil, y represents the ordinate of the steel coil, and xiRepresenting an upper limit of an abscissa value, x, in the divided regioni-1Indicating a lower limit of an abscissa value, L, in the divided regionbcRepresenting the span of the panel, qmThe uniform load is expressed, b represents the panel equal dividing width, h represents the panel height, and f (x, y) is the final outline curve equation of the steel coil.
Step S16: and selecting the largest one of the maximum compressive stress corresponding to the first stage and the maximum compressive stress corresponding to the second stage as the compressive stress to be compared.
Step S17: judging whether the compressive stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the allowable compressive stress, if so, indicating that the side plate bearing does not meet the requirement, and executing a step S3; and if the compressive stress to be compared is smaller than the allowable compressive stress, the side plate bearing meets the requirement and does not need to be processed.
Step S18: calculating a maximum deflection line equation corresponding to the first stage, wherein the specific formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002586779080000091
wherein, y1maxExpressing the maximum deflection line equation corresponding to the first stage, y represents the ordinate of the steel coil, and xiRepresenting an upper limit of an abscissa value, q, in the divided regionmRepresenting the uniform load, f2(xi) For critical parameter values determined from the divided regions, LbcPanel span is denoted, E elastic modulus, and I moment of inertia.
Step S19: calculating a maximum deflection line equation corresponding to the second stage, wherein the specific formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002586779080000092
wherein, y2maxExpressing the maximum deflection line equation corresponding to the second stage, y represents the ordinate of the steel coil, xiRepresenting an upper limit of an abscissa value, q, in the divided regionmDenotes the uniform load, LbcPanel span is denoted, E elastic modulus, and I moment of inertia.
The stress condition of the middle plate in the vertical bracket is shown in fig. 5, a stress model of a typical simple supported beam is obtained through simplification, the stress model is analyzed by dividing regions in the width direction of the middle plate, and the model is built for different parts, specifically, the step S2 includes:
step S21: according to the symmetry principle, the quarter part of the middle plate is subjected to region division in the width direction to obtain a first region, a second region and a third region respectively; the method includes dividing a simple beam according to mechanics of materials into a first area and a first area which is not tangent to the inner diameter of the steel coil, dividing a simple beam combination area according to mechanics of materials into a second area which is intersected with the inner diameter of the steel coil, and dividing a simple beam with a cantilever structure according to mechanics of materials into a third area, as shown in fig. 6.
The reconstruction of the coordinates in each region according to the coil profile is shown in fig. 7, and the specific steps are as follows:
step S22: determining the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first region, the maximum bending stress corresponding to the second region and the maximum bending stress corresponding to the third region; the method comprises the following specific steps:
as shown in fig. 7 (a), the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first region is determined, and the specific formula is:
Figure BDA0002586779080000101
wherein, F31Representing the distributed load function, q, corresponding to a first zone of the midplanemDenotes the uniform load, LbcRepresents the panel span, rgIndicating the inner diameter, L, of the coilbkDenotes the middle plate width, σw31maxThe maximum bending stress corresponding to the first area of the middle plate is shown, b represents the panel equal dividing width, h represents the panel height, and x represents the abscissa of the steel coil.
Determining a maximum deflection curve equation corresponding to the first area, wherein the specific formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002586779080000102
wherein, y31maxExpressing the equation of the curve of maximum deflection corresponding to the first region, LbcRepresenting the span of the panel, qm3The redistributed load in the coordinate system of the first area of the middle plate is shown, x represents the abscissa of the steel coil, E represents the elastic modulus, and I represents the inertia moment.
As shown in fig. 7 (b), the maximum bending stress corresponding to the second region is determined, and the specific formula is:
Figure BDA0002586779080000103
wherein, yiIndicating a value of ordinate, F, selected under specific conditions32(yi) Representing the distributed load function, q, corresponding to a second zone of the midplanemRepresenting the uniform load, f321(y)、f322(y) is respectively the equation of the inscribed arc and the equation of the circumscribed arc, sigmaw32maxIndicates the maximum bending stress, L, corresponding to the second region of the middle platebcRepresenting the span of the panel, qm4The redistributed load in the middle plate second area coordinate system is shown, x represents the abscissa of the steel coil, y represents the ordinate of the steel coil, dy represents the differential of the ordinate, b represents the panel equally-divided width, and h represents the panel height.
Determining a maximum deflection curve equation corresponding to the second area, wherein the specific formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002586779080000111
wherein, y32maxExpressing the maximum deflection curve equation, L, corresponding to the second regionbcRepresenting the span of the panel, qm4The redistributed load in the coordinate system of the second area of the middle plate is shown, x represents the abscissa of the steel coil, E represents the elastic modulus, I represents the moment of inertia, and L represents the plywood span.
As shown in fig. 7 (c), the maximum bending stress corresponding to the third region is determined, and the specific formula is:
Figure BDA0002586779080000112
wherein, yiIndicating a value of ordinate, F, selected under specific conditions33(yi) Representing the distributed load function, q, corresponding to the third zone of the midplanemRepresenting the uniform load, x representing the abscissa of the coil, y representing the ordinate of the coil, rgIndicating the inner diameter, R, of the coilgIndicating the outside diameter, W, of the steel coil33i1(x,yi) Representing the bending moment at the cantilever of the simply supported beam in the third area under the new coordinate of coordinate transformation, R representing the radius of the steel coil, and LbcRepresenting the span of the panel, W33i2Representing coordinate transformationsBending moment of the inner side of the third area simply supported beam in new coordinates, qm5Represents the redistributed load, σ, in the middle plate third area coordinate systemw33maxThe maximum bending stress corresponding to the third area of the middle plate is shown, corresponding to the maximum bending moment, b is the panel equal-dividing width, and h is the panel height.
Determining a maximum deflection curve equation corresponding to the third area, wherein the specific formula is as follows:
Figure BDA0002586779080000113
wherein, y33maxRepresents the curve equation of maximum deflection corresponding to the third area, LbcRepresenting the span of the panel, qm5The redistributed load in the coordinate system of the third area of the middle plate is shown, x represents the abscissa of the steel coil, a represents the length of the middle plate exceeding the center line of the skid, E represents the elastic modulus, and I represents the inertia moment.
Step S23: and selecting the largest one of the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first region, the maximum bending stress corresponding to the second region and the maximum bending stress corresponding to the third region as a second bending stress to be compared.
Step S24: judging whether the second bending stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the static bending strength of the panel or not; if the second bending stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the static bending strength of the panel, the condition that the side plate load is not met is indicated, and step S3 is executed; and if the second bending stress to be compared is smaller than the static bending strength of the panel, the condition that the side plate meets the requirement in load bearing is indicated, and the treatment is not needed.
An improvement is proposed from the structural weakness and the processing technique by calculating the load bearing of the plywood and the middle plate to prevent the reduction of the service performance of the plywood caused by the cracking of the plywood, and the specific step S3 includes:
step S31: carry out the rubber coating to plywood bundling band department and seal to change sideboard notch and medium plate notch into the fillet by the right angle, prevent that the plywood from producing the collision when bundling band and roll table transportation and causing the plywood fracture, specifically as shown in figure 8 and figure 9.
Step S32: a bead was designed for the panel extension sideboard, the portion exceeding the footpad was encapsulated, and the encapsulated bead was assembled to the middle plate with a nail gun, the bead having a thickness of 1mm, as shown in fig. 10 and 11.
Example 2:
as shown in fig. 12, the present invention also provides an optimization system for a vertical bracket structure used in a steel coil transportation and standing process, the system comprising:
the first judgment module 1 is used for judging whether the side plate bearing of the vertical bracket structure meets the requirement or not; if the side plate load bearing of the vertical bracket structure does not meet the requirement, executing an 'optimization module'; if the requirements are met, no processing is required.
The second judgment module 2 is used for judging whether the bearing of the middle plate of the vertical bracket structure meets the requirement or not; if the bearing of the middle plate of the vertical bracket structure does not meet the requirement, executing an optimization module; if the load bearing of the middle plate of the vertical bracket structure meets the requirement, no treatment is needed.
And the optimization module 3 is used for optimizing the vertical bracket structure.
As an embodiment, the first determining module 1 of the present invention includes:
dividing the side plate of the vertical bracket structure into two stages; the first stage is y e (0, f)2(xi,y)]The second stage is
Figure BDA0002586779080000131
Wherein y represents the ordinate of the coil of steel, f2(xi) For critical parameter values determined from the divided regions, LbcRepresenting the panel span.
And the first maximum bending stress determining unit is used for determining the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first stage and the maximum bending stress corresponding to the second stage.
And the first bending stress to be compared determining unit is used for selecting the largest one of the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first stage and the maximum bending stress corresponding to the second stage as the first bending stress to be compared.
The first judging unit is used for judging whether the first bending stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the static bending strength of the panel or not; if the first bending stress to be compared is larger than or equal to the static bending strength of the panel, executing an optimization module; if the first bending stress to be compared is smaller than the static bending strength of the panel, no operation is needed.
As an embodiment, the first determining module 1 of the present invention further includes:
and the maximum compressive stress determining unit is used for calculating the maximum compressive stress corresponding to the first stage and the maximum compressive stress corresponding to the second stage.
And the to-be-compared compressive stress determining unit is used for selecting the largest one of the maximum compressive stress corresponding to the first stage and the maximum compressive stress corresponding to the second stage as the to-be-compared compressive stress.
A second judging unit, configured to judge whether the compressive stress to be compared is greater than or equal to an allowable compressive stress, and if the compressive stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the allowable compressive stress, execute an "optimization module"; and if the compressive stress to be compared is less than the allowable compressive stress, no treatment is needed.
As an embodiment, the second determination module 2 of the present invention includes:
and the area dividing unit is used for dividing the quarter part of the middle plate in the width direction according to the symmetry principle to respectively obtain a first area, a second area and a third area.
And the second maximum bending stress determining unit is used for determining the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first region, the maximum bending stress corresponding to the second region and the maximum bending stress corresponding to the third region.
And the second bending stress to be compared determining unit is used for selecting the largest one of the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first region, the maximum bending stress corresponding to the second region and the maximum bending stress corresponding to the third region as the second bending stress to be compared.
The third judging unit is used for judging whether the second bending stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the static bending strength of the panel; if the second bending stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the static bending strength of the panel, executing an optimization module; if the second bending stress to be compared is smaller than the static bending strength of the panel, no treatment is needed.
As an embodiment, the optimization module 3 of the present invention includes:
and the gluing and sealing module is used for gluing and sealing the position of the plywood bundling belt and changing the notches of the side plates and the notches of the middle plate from right angles to round angles.
And the packaging module is used for designing a protective edge for the panel extension side plate, packaging the part exceeding the foot pad and assembling the packaged protective edge on the middle plate by using a nail gun.
Example 3:
the specification of the selected vertical bracket is D1000:
in step S1, the side plates of the vertical bracket panel are subjected to force analysis to create a load bearing model.
1. The steel coil stress distribution model is expressed as: f. of1(x,y)＝(x-x0)2+(y-y0)2-4502At this time, three points (0,450), (283,350) and (126,432) are taken, a new coordinate system is established by taking the point (385,350) as an origin, the original y axis as an x axis and the original negative x direction as a y axis. The three-point coordinates become (100,385), (0,102), (82,259), and a new load distribution model f is calculated2(x)＝ax2+ bx + c, solution c 102,822a+82b+c＝259,1002385, a is 0.05, b is-2.17, c is 102, and the new coil load distribution equation is f2(x)＝0.05x2-2.17x+102。
2. Total area S of force applied by panelz＝517748mm2The weight M of the steel coilG10000kg of uniform load
Figure BDA0002586779080000141
Since dx is 10 when the edge plate is divided into 10, b is 10mm, the panel height h is 30mm, and the moment of inertia of the panel
Figure BDA0002586779080000142
Panel span Lbc770 mm. The sideboard is loaded with
Figure BDA0002586779080000143
Root of common monkshood daughterGet the result
Figure BDA0002586779080000145
3. The bending moment applied to the panel is divided into two stages, wherein the first stage is y ∈ (0, f)2(xi)]Corresponding bending moment W2i1＝F2(10) 1600 · y; the second stage is
Figure BDA0002586779080000144
Corresponding bending moment
Figure BDA0002586779080000151
Bending stress of
Figure BDA0002586779080000152
When y is 385mm
Figure BDA0002586779080000153
The static bending strength of the plywood under the transverse striation is [ sigma ] according to the national standard GBT 17656-]At 35MPa, the maximum bending stress exceeds the static bending strength of the panel, i.e. the maximum bending stress exceeds the bearing limit of the plywood, so that the counter bracket structure needs to be optimized.
4. Ultimate deflection value of
Figure BDA0002586779080000154
Elastic modulus E is 4000MPa, qmRedistributed load of
Figure BDA0002586779080000155
Obtaining ultimate deflection value by taking parameters into
Figure BDA0002586779080000156
5. Assuming that the panel bears uniform load, the maximum bending stress of the side plates exceeds the stress limit of the plywood, the theoretical deformation of the middle parts of the side plates reaches 0.2785mm, and therefore the plywood is not easy to damage in the using process. And in practical use, the bracket bears the uniform load only when the steel coil is placed on the bracket at one moment.
6. According to the deflection value of the panel, after the panel is deformed, the compressive stress borne by the panel is calculated due to the support of the brackets at the two sides. Taking three points (-270, 360), (-126, 432), (-103, 438), changing the coordinates relative to the point (-450,450) into (12, 103), (18, 126), (90, 360), solving the final profile curve equation of the steel coil according to the three points: f. of2(x)＝-0.0417x2+7.75X, the skid was 10-fold divided in the width direction and the sideboard compressive stress was ten-fold divided in the length direction
Figure BDA0002586779080000157
The calculated maximum compressive stress is the following from the parameters introduced:
Figure BDA0002586779080000158
according to the national standard GBT 17656 and 2008, the static bending strength of the plywood under the transverse striation is 35MPa, and the maximum compressive stress of the side plates exceeds the bearing limit of the plywood, so that the structure of the counter bracket needs to be optimized.
In step S2, the middle plate of the counter bracket panel is subjected to force analysis to create a load bearing model.
1. As shown in fig. 7 (a), parameters are substituted into 385mm, 60mm, 30mm for the panel height h, and the moment of inertia of the panel
Figure BDA0002586779080000161
Inner diameter r of steel coilg200mm, middle plate width Lbk260mm, distributed load function of
Figure BDA0002586779080000162
Bending stress of
Figure BDA0002586779080000163
Maximum deflection value of
Figure BDA0002586779080000164
Is calculated to
Figure BDA0002586779080000165
Maximum bending stress of
Figure BDA0002586779080000166
Maximum deflection value of
Figure BDA0002586779080000167
The panel does not deform substantially in practice, but the support of the panel loses its practical effect and the panel is destroyed only by external force.
2. As shown in fig. 7 (b), the circumscribed arc takes three points (403,200), (430,132), (424,150), the inscribed arc takes three points (0,200), (150,132), (120,160), and the origin coordinates of the points (0,132) are transformed into (403,68), (430,0), (424, 18); (0,68), (150,0), (120, 28). Equation f of circumscribed arc321(y)＝-0.0013y2-0.31y+430；f322(y)＝-0.028y2-0.3y + 150. So that the area is loaded
Figure BDA0002586779080000171
Figure BDA0002586779080000172
Maximum bending stress of
Figure BDA0002586779080000173
Y is divided by 10 according to the width, so that y is 61.2mm, x is approximately 385mm, and the product is obtained
Figure BDA0002586779080000174
Maximum deflection value of
Figure BDA0002586779080000175
The amount of deformation exceeds the limit of plywood.
3. As shown in FIG. 7 (c), coordinates of the three points (430,132), (440,94) (450,0) with respect to the point (0,132) are (403,68), (430,0), (424,18), and the arc equation is
Figure BDA0002586779080000176
Figure BDA0002586779080000177
The area distributes the load as
Figure BDA0002586779080000178
The area was divided by 10 equal division with parameters dy ≈ 13.2mm, x ≈ 250mm, b ═ 13.2mm, h ≈ 30mm,
Figure BDA0002586779080000179
qm5＝7.5N/mm2and a is 65, so that: f33i1About 0.5679, 250, 13.2 ═ 1874N, bending moment
Figure BDA00025867790800001710
A deflection value of
Figure BDA00025867790800001711
Calculated to obtain W33i2(x,yi)＝202502.5N·mm2Maximum bending stress of
Figure BDA00025867790800001712
The maximum deflection value can be calculated
Figure BDA0002586779080000181
4. The maximum bending stress of the middle plate exceeds the limit of the panel. The bending stress analysis is carried out on the part contacted with the steel coil, and the bending stress of the maximum part is the middle plate part: sigmaw31max556.5MPa, and the static bending strength of the plywood under the transverse striation is [ sigma ] according to the national standard GBT 17656-]At 35MPa, the maximum bending stress experienced by the middle panel has exceeded the static bending strength of plywood, and therefore, the structure needs to be optimized.
In step S3, in order to prevent the deterioration of the service performance of plywood caused by the cracking of plywood, improvement suggestions are made from the structural weakness and the processing technique, which include the following specific steps:
1. carry out on the basis that the extra rubber coating is sealed to plywood bundling strap department, change sideboard and medium plate notch into the fillet by the right angle, prevent that the plywood from producing the collision when bundling strap and roll table transportation and causing the plywood fracture.
2. The design safe edge of panel extension sideboard surpasss to fill up foot part to it and encapsulates, and the thickness of safe edge is 1mm, assembles the safe edge on the medium plate with the nail rifle, according to different specification and dimension, carries out processing design to the safe edge.
Example 2:
the specification of the selected vertical bracket is D1300
In step S1, the side plates of the vertical bracket panel are subjected to force analysis to create a load bearing model.
1. The steel coil stress distribution model is expressed as: f. of1(x,y)＝(x-x0)2+(y-y0)2-4502At this time, three points (0,450), (283,350) and (126,432) are taken, a new coordinate system is established by taking the point (505,350) as an origin, the original y axis as an x axis and the original negative x direction as a y axis. The three-point coordinates become (100,505), (0,222), (82,379), and f is calculated2(x)＝ax2+ bx + c, solution c 222, 822a+82b+c＝379，1002a +100b + c 505, a is 0.051, b is-2.27, c is 222, and the steel coil load distribution equation is f2(x)＝0.051x2-2.27x+222。
2. Total area S of force applied by panelz＝818409mm2The weight M of the steel coilG12000kg to obtain its uniform load
Figure BDA0002586779080000191
Since dx is 10 when the edge plate is divided into 10, b is 10mm, the panel height h is 30mm, and the moment of inertia of the panel
Figure BDA0002586779080000192
Panel span Lbc1010 mm. The sideboard is loaded with
Figure BDA0002586779080000193
Carry-in parameters to
Figure BDA0002586779080000194
3. The bending moment applied to the panel is divided into two stages, the first stageIs y ∈ (0, f)2(xi)]Corresponding bending moment W2i1＝F21269 · y; the second stage is
Figure BDA0002586779080000195
Corresponding bending moment
Figure BDA0002586779080000196
Bending stress of
Figure BDA0002586779080000197
When in use
Figure BDA0002586779080000198
The maximum bending stress is:
Figure BDA0002586779080000199
the static bending strength of the plywood under the transverse striation is [ sigma ] according to the national standard GBT 17656-]At 35MPa, the maximum bending stress exceeds the static bending strength of the panel, i.e. the maximum bending stress exceeds the bearing limit of the plywood. It is therefore desirable to optimize the counter bracket structure.
4. Ultimate deflection value of
Figure BDA00025867790800001910
Elastic modulus E is 4000MPa, qmRedistributed load of
Figure BDA00025867790800001911
Obtaining ultimate deflection value by taking parameters into
Figure BDA00025867790800001912
5. Assuming that the panel bears uniform load, the local maximum bending stress of the side plate exceeds the stress limit of the plywood, and the theoretical deformation of the middle part of the side plate reaches 0.477mm, so that the plywood is not easy to damage in the using process. And when in actual use, the bracket bears the uniform load only when the steel coil is placed on the bracket at one moment.
6. According to the deflection value of the panel, when the panel is changedAfter forming, the support of the brackets on both sides requires calculation of the compressive stress to which the panel is subjected. Taking three points (-270, 360), (-126, 432), (-103, 438), changing the coordinates relative to the point (-450,450) into (12, 103), (18, 126), (90, 360), solving the final profile curve equation of the steel coil according to the three points: f. of2(x)＝-0.0417x2+7.75X, the skid was 10-fold divided in the width direction and the sideboard compressive stress was ten-fold divided in the length direction
Figure BDA0002586779080000201
The maximum compressive stress is calculated as parameters:
Figure BDA0002586779080000202
according to the national standard GBT 17656 and 2008, the static bending strength of the plywood under the transverse striation is 35MPa, and the maximum compressive stress of the side plate does not exceed the bearing limit of the plywood, so that the structure of the counter bracket is not required to be optimized.
In step S2, the middle plate of the counter bracket panel is subjected to force analysis to create a load bearing model.
1. As shown in fig. 7 (a), parameters are substituted into 385mm, 60mm, 30mm for the panel height h, and the moment of inertia of the panel
Figure BDA0002586779080000203
Inner diameter r of steel coilg200mm, middle plate width Lbk260mm, distributed load function of
Figure BDA0002586779080000204
Compressive stress of
Figure BDA0002586779080000205
Maximum deflection value of
Figure BDA0002586779080000206
Is calculated to
Figure BDA0002586779080000207
Maximum bending stress of
Figure BDA0002586779080000208
Maximum deflection value of
Figure BDA0002586779080000209
The panel does not deform substantially in practice, but the support of the panel loses its practical effect and the panel is destroyed only by external force.
2. As shown in fig. 7 (b), the circumscribed arc takes three points (403,200), (430,132), (424,150), the inscribed arc takes three points (0,200), (150,132), (120,160), and the origin coordinates of the points (0,132) are transformed into (403,68), (430,0), (424, 18); (0,68), (150,0), (120, 28). Equation f of circumscribed arc321(x,y)＝-0.0013y2-0.31y+430；f322(x,y)＝-0.028y2-0.3y + 150. So that the area is loaded
Figure BDA0002586779080000211
Figure BDA0002586779080000212
Maximum bending stress of
Figure BDA0002586779080000213
Y is divided by 10 equal parts according to the width, so that y is 61.2mm, x is 385mm, and the maximum bending stress is:
Figure BDA0002586779080000214
maximum deflection value of
Figure BDA0002586779080000215
The amount of deformation does not exceed the limit of plywood.
3. As shown in FIG. 7 (c), coordinates of the three points (430,132), (440,94) (450,0) with respect to the point (0,132) are (403,68), (430,0), (424,18), and the arc equation is
Figure BDA0002586779080000216
Figure BDA0002586779080000217
The area distributes the load as
Figure BDA0002586779080000218
The area was divided by 10 equal division with parameters dy ≈ 13.2mm, x ≈ 185mm, b ═ 13.2mm, h ═ 30mm,
Figure BDA0002586779080000221
a＝65、qm5＝5.7N/mm2thus, it is possible to obtain: f331About 0.4311X 250X 13.2 ═ 1423N, bending moment is
Figure BDA0002586779080000222
A deflection value of
Figure BDA0002586779080000223
Calculated to obtain W33i2(x,yi)＝157092.5N·mm2Maximum bending stress of
Figure BDA0002586779080000224
The maximum deflection value can be calculated
Figure BDA0002586779080000225
4. The maximum bending stress of medium plate surpasses the limit of the quiet bending strength of panel, because the coil of strip is the rigid body, the great place of panel deformation makes the panel lose the supporting role of getting the coil of strip in the twinkling of an eye of load effect, and panel and coil of strip department are hardly contacted at the center this moment, but in case contact external force, the breakage takes place very easily for the panel. The bending stress analysis is carried out on the part contacted with the steel coil, and the bending stress of the maximum part is the middle plate part: sigmaw31max726.83MPa, and the static bending strength of the plywood under the transverse striation is [ sigma ] according to the national standard GBT 17656-]At 35MPa, the maximum bending stress experienced by the middle panel has exceeded the static bending strength of plywood, and therefore, the structure needs to be optimized.
In step S3, in order to prevent the deterioration of the service performance of plywood caused by the cracking of plywood, improvement suggestions are made from the structural weakness and the processing technique, which include the following specific steps:
1. carry out on the basis that the extra rubber coating is sealed to plywood bundling strap department, change sideboard and medium plate notch into the fillet by the right angle, prevent that the plywood from producing the collision when bundling strap and roll table transportation and causing the plywood fracture.
2. The design safe edge of panel extension sideboard surpasss to fill up foot part to it and encapsulates, and the thickness of safe edge is 1mm, assembles the safe edge on the medium plate with the nail rifle, according to different specification and dimension, carries out processing design to the safe edge.
The embodiments in the present description are described in a progressive manner, each embodiment focuses on differences from other embodiments, and the same and similar parts among the embodiments are referred to each other.
The principles and embodiments of the present invention have been described herein using specific examples, which are provided only to help understand the method and the core concept of the present invention; meanwhile, for a person skilled in the art, according to the idea of the present invention, the specific embodiments and the application range may be changed. In view of the above, the present disclosure should not be construed as limiting the invention.

Claims (10)

1. A method for optimizing the structure of a vertical bracket used in the steel coil transportation and standing process is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step S1: judging whether the side plate bearing of the vertical bracket structure meets the requirements or not; if the side plate load bearing of the vertical bracket structure does not meet the requirement, executing step S3; if the requirements are met, no processing is needed;
step S2: judging whether the bearing of the middle plate of the vertical bracket structure meets the requirement or not; if the load of the middle plate of the vertical bracket structure does not meet the requirement, executing the step S3; if the bearing of the middle plate of the vertical bracket structure meets the requirement, the middle plate does not need to be processed;
step S3: the vertical bracket structure is optimized.
2. The method for optimizing the structure of the vertical support bracket for the steel coil transportation and standing process according to claim 1, wherein the step S1 comprises:
dividing the side plate of the vertical bracket structure into two stages; the first stage is y e (0, f)2(xi)]The second stage is
Figure FDA0002586779070000011
Wherein y represents the ordinate of the coil of steel, f2(xi) For critical parameter values determined from the divided regions, LbcRepresenting a panel span;
determining the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first stage and the maximum bending stress corresponding to the second stage;
selecting the largest one of the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first stage and the maximum bending stress corresponding to the second stage as a first bending stress to be compared;
judging whether the first bending stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the static bending strength of the panel or not; if the first bending stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the static bending strength of the panel, executing step S3; if the first bending stress to be compared is smaller than the static bending strength of the panel, no operation is needed.
3. The method for optimizing the structure of the vertical support bracket for the steel coil transportation and standing process of claim 2, wherein the step S1 further comprises:
calculating the maximum compressive stress corresponding to the first stage and the maximum compressive stress corresponding to the second stage;
selecting the largest one of the maximum compressive stress corresponding to the first stage and the maximum compressive stress corresponding to the second stage as the compressive stress to be compared;
judging whether the compressive stress to be compared is greater than or equal to an allowable compressive stress, and executing the step S3 if the compressive stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the allowable compressive stress; and if the compressive stress to be compared is less than the allowable compressive stress, no treatment is needed.
4. The method for optimizing the structure of the vertical support bracket for the steel coil transportation and standing process according to claim 1, wherein the step S2 comprises:
according to the symmetry principle, the quarter part of the middle plate is subjected to region division in the width direction to obtain a first region, a second region and a third region respectively;
determining the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first region, the maximum bending stress corresponding to the second region and the maximum bending stress corresponding to the third region;
selecting the largest one of the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first region, the maximum bending stress corresponding to the second region and the maximum bending stress corresponding to the third region as a second bending stress to be compared;
judging whether the second bending stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the static bending strength of the panel or not; if the second bending stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the static bending strength of the panel, executing step S3; if the second bending stress to be compared is smaller than the static bending strength of the panel, no treatment is needed.
5. The method for optimizing the structure of the vertical support bracket for the steel coil transportation and standing process according to claim 1, wherein the step S3 comprises:
gluing and sealing the binding tape of the plywood, and changing the notches of the side plates and the notches of the middle plate from right angles to round angles;
and designing a protective edge for the panel extension side plate, packaging the part exceeding the pad foot, and assembling the packaged protective edge on the middle plate by using a nail gun.
6. A system for optimizing the structure of a vertical bracket used in the steel coil transportation and standing process is characterized by comprising:
the first judgment module is used for judging whether the side plate bearing of the vertical bracket structure meets the requirement or not; if the side plate load bearing of the vertical bracket structure does not meet the requirement, executing an 'optimization module'; if the requirements are met, no processing is needed;
the second judging module is used for judging whether the bearing of the middle plate of the vertical bracket structure meets the requirement or not; if the bearing of the middle plate of the vertical bracket structure does not meet the requirement, executing an optimization module; if the bearing of the middle plate of the vertical bracket structure meets the requirement, the middle plate does not need to be processed;
an optimization module for optimizing the vertical bracket structure.
7. The system for optimizing the structure of the vertical bracket for the steel coil transportation and standing process according to claim 6, wherein the first determining module comprises:
the dividing unit is used for dividing the side plate of the vertical bracket structure into two stages; the first stage is y e (0, f)2(xi)]The second stage is
Figure FDA0002586779070000021
Wherein y represents the ordinate of the coil of steel, f2(xi) For critical parameter values determined from the divided regions, LbcRepresenting a panel span;
the first maximum bending stress determining unit is used for determining the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first stage and the maximum bending stress corresponding to the second stage;
the first bending stress to be compared determining unit is used for selecting the largest one of the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first stage and the maximum bending stress corresponding to the second stage as the first bending stress to be compared;
the first judging unit is used for judging whether the first bending stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the static bending strength of the panel or not; if the first bending stress to be compared is larger than or equal to the static bending strength of the panel, executing an optimization module; if the first bending stress to be compared is smaller than the static bending strength of the panel, no operation is needed.
8. The system for optimizing the structure of the vertical bracket for the steel coil transportation and standing process according to claim 7, wherein the first determining module further comprises:
the maximum compressive stress determining unit is used for calculating the maximum compressive stress corresponding to the first stage and the maximum compressive stress corresponding to the second stage;
the to-be-compared compressive stress determining unit is used for selecting the largest one of the maximum compressive stress corresponding to the first stage and the maximum compressive stress corresponding to the second stage as the to-be-compared compressive stress;
a second judging unit, configured to judge whether the compressive stress to be compared is greater than or equal to an allowable compressive stress, and if the compressive stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the allowable compressive stress, execute an "optimization module"; and if the compressive stress to be compared is less than the allowable compressive stress, no treatment is needed.
9. The system for optimizing the structure of the vertical support bracket for the steel coil transportation and standing process according to claim 6, wherein the second determination module comprises:
the area dividing unit is used for dividing the quarter part of the middle plate in the width direction according to the symmetry principle to respectively obtain a first area, a second area and a third area;
the second maximum bending stress determining unit is used for determining the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first region, the maximum bending stress corresponding to the second region and the maximum bending stress corresponding to the third region;
the second bending stress determining unit is used for selecting the largest one of the maximum bending stress corresponding to the first region, the maximum bending stress corresponding to the second region and the maximum bending stress corresponding to the third region as a second bending stress to be compared;
the third judging unit is used for judging whether the second bending stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the static bending strength of the panel; if the second bending stress to be compared is greater than or equal to the static bending strength of the panel, executing an optimization module; if the second bending stress to be compared is smaller than the static bending strength of the panel, no treatment is needed.
10. The system for optimizing a steel coil transportation and rest process vertical bracket structure according to claim 6, wherein the optimizing module comprises:
the gluing and sealing module is used for gluing and sealing the binding belt of the plywood and changing the notches of the side plates and the notches of the middle plate from right angles to round angles;
and the packaging module is used for designing a protective edge for the panel extension side plate, packaging the part exceeding the foot pad and assembling the packaged protective edge on the middle plate by using a nail gun.
CN202010683847.XA 2020-07-16 2020-07-16 Method and system for optimizing vertical bracket structure in steel coil transportation and standing process Active CN111924331B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010683847.XA CN111924331B (en) 2020-07-16 2020-07-16 Method and system for optimizing vertical bracket structure in steel coil transportation and standing process

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010683847.XA CN111924331B (en) 2020-07-16 2020-07-16 Method and system for optimizing vertical bracket structure in steel coil transportation and standing process

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN111924331A true CN111924331A (en) 2020-11-13
CN111924331B CN111924331B (en) 2022-02-08

Family

ID=73314034

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202010683847.XA Active CN111924331B (en) 2020-07-16 2020-07-16 Method and system for optimizing vertical bracket structure in steel coil transportation and standing process

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN111924331B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112749455A (en) * 2021-01-12 2021-05-04 燕山大学 Wood platform structure optimization method and system in plate strip transverse cutting unit

Citations (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101776908A (en) * 2010-01-02 2010-07-14 燕山大学 Comprehensive optimization method for degreasing set coiling technique
CN102032992A (en) * 2010-10-22 2011-04-27 奇瑞汽车股份有限公司 Analysis method for fatigue of torsion beam welding assembly
CN102553966A (en) * 2012-01-18 2012-07-11 燕山大学 Strip steel winding quality online comprehensive judging method
EP2886788A2 (en) * 2013-12-23 2015-06-24 2HOffshore, Inc. Riser fatigue monitoring
CN105184390A (en) * 2015-08-12 2015-12-23 中国运载火箭技术研究院 Integrated optimization method of static strength, rigidity, stability of wallboard structure
CN106844907A (en) * 2017-01-04 2017-06-13 中南大学 The cooperative optimization method of cylinder of rotary kiln bearing position and cylinder thickness
CN106897482A (en) * 2017-01-06 2017-06-27 燕山大学 The tie fracture method for integrated control of coils of hot-rolled steel
CN107085631A (en) * 2017-03-30 2017-08-22 中国航空工业集团公司西安飞机设计研究所 A kind of strength check methods based on hatch door detail model
CN108062439A (en) * 2017-12-08 2018-05-22 西安科技大学 Roadway support quantifying design method based on plastic zone of surrounding rock size
CN108374352A (en) * 2018-03-12 2018-08-07 中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司 A kind of the pier bottom rotation swivel construction method and system of wide-plate bridge pier
US20180276889A1 (en) * 2017-03-22 2018-09-27 Tata Consultancy Services Limited System and method for design of additively manufactured products
CN108595852A (en) * 2018-04-28 2018-09-28 北京交通大学 A kind of heavy haul railway bridge pier abutment longitudinal force analysis optimization method
CN109145393A (en) * 2018-07-27 2019-01-04 燕山大学 A kind of bionic structure light-weight design method
US20190087528A1 (en) * 2017-09-15 2019-03-21 China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd. Method for Resisting Dynamic Load in High Temperature Pipeline
CN110147645A (en) * 2019-06-13 2019-08-20 燕山大学 Validation of Simulation Models, method for building up and application during thin-wall copper pipe welding production
CN110765579A (en) * 2019-09-21 2020-02-07 蚌埠市力业传感器有限公司 Cantilever beam sensor design method
CN110955993A (en) * 2019-11-22 2020-04-03 湖南城市学院 Optimum design method for beam membrane structure of micro-pressure sensor
CN110990970A (en) * 2019-11-29 2020-04-10 贵州大自然科技股份有限公司 Design and detection method of lightweight structure of palm mattress
CN111310375A (en) * 2020-02-14 2020-06-19 广东工业大学 Machining method for optimizing shock wave pressure of laser double-sided simultaneous opposite impact titanium alloy blade

Patent Citations (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101776908A (en) * 2010-01-02 2010-07-14 燕山大学 Comprehensive optimization method for degreasing set coiling technique
CN102032992A (en) * 2010-10-22 2011-04-27 奇瑞汽车股份有限公司 Analysis method for fatigue of torsion beam welding assembly
CN102553966A (en) * 2012-01-18 2012-07-11 燕山大学 Strip steel winding quality online comprehensive judging method
EP2886788A2 (en) * 2013-12-23 2015-06-24 2HOffshore, Inc. Riser fatigue monitoring
CN105184390A (en) * 2015-08-12 2015-12-23 中国运载火箭技术研究院 Integrated optimization method of static strength, rigidity, stability of wallboard structure
CN106844907A (en) * 2017-01-04 2017-06-13 中南大学 The cooperative optimization method of cylinder of rotary kiln bearing position and cylinder thickness
CN106897482A (en) * 2017-01-06 2017-06-27 燕山大学 The tie fracture method for integrated control of coils of hot-rolled steel
US20180276889A1 (en) * 2017-03-22 2018-09-27 Tata Consultancy Services Limited System and method for design of additively manufactured products
CN107085631A (en) * 2017-03-30 2017-08-22 中国航空工业集团公司西安飞机设计研究所 A kind of strength check methods based on hatch door detail model
US20190087528A1 (en) * 2017-09-15 2019-03-21 China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd. Method for Resisting Dynamic Load in High Temperature Pipeline
CN108062439A (en) * 2017-12-08 2018-05-22 西安科技大学 Roadway support quantifying design method based on plastic zone of surrounding rock size
CN108374352A (en) * 2018-03-12 2018-08-07 中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司 A kind of the pier bottom rotation swivel construction method and system of wide-plate bridge pier
CN108595852A (en) * 2018-04-28 2018-09-28 北京交通大学 A kind of heavy haul railway bridge pier abutment longitudinal force analysis optimization method
CN109145393A (en) * 2018-07-27 2019-01-04 燕山大学 A kind of bionic structure light-weight design method
CN110147645A (en) * 2019-06-13 2019-08-20 燕山大学 Validation of Simulation Models, method for building up and application during thin-wall copper pipe welding production
CN110765579A (en) * 2019-09-21 2020-02-07 蚌埠市力业传感器有限公司 Cantilever beam sensor design method
CN110955993A (en) * 2019-11-22 2020-04-03 湖南城市学院 Optimum design method for beam membrane structure of micro-pressure sensor
CN110990970A (en) * 2019-11-29 2020-04-10 贵州大自然科技股份有限公司 Design and detection method of lightweight structure of palm mattress
CN111310375A (en) * 2020-02-14 2020-06-19 广东工业大学 Machining method for optimizing shock wave pressure of laser double-sided simultaneous opposite impact titanium alloy blade

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
张宁博等: "基于热-结构耦合的托架受力分析及优化", 《石化技术》 *
李东阳: "连续梁0#块托架受力分析研究", 《甘肃科技纵横》 *
马婕: "堆垛钢板用木托架的受力分析及优化", 《包装工程》 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112749455A (en) * 2021-01-12 2021-05-04 燕山大学 Wood platform structure optimization method and system in plate strip transverse cutting unit

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN111924331B (en) 2022-02-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN111924331B (en) Method and system for optimizing vertical bracket structure in steel coil transportation and standing process
KR101692658B1 (en) Press-molding method
CA2879808C (en) Press-forming tool and method for manufacturing press-formed product
US9508968B2 (en) Method and apparatus for manufacturing a battery safety valve, a battery safety valve, and method for manufacturing a battery case lid
US11345188B2 (en) Single piece heavy duty wheel
CN107704657B (en) Method for calculating buckling deformation of plate parts caused by residual stress release
EP2796220B1 (en) Method for designing die for press forming
CA2825756C (en) Plate-shaped workpiece forming method and formed article
EP2664392B1 (en) Method for bending metal sheet and device for regulating residual stress
US20100027932A1 (en) Roller bearing and method of designing crowning
US20160160311A1 (en) Method for forming blank and method for determining preforming shape
US20210138528A1 (en) Apparatus for manufacturing parts, and related methods
CN107900608A (en) A kind of split type axle box Light deformation control technique
JP2020528007A (en) Systems and methods for controlling the flatness of metal substrates by low pressure rolling
CN106844925B (en) Adjusting design method for contact load of two-stage auxiliary spring type gradient stiffness plate spring based on offset frequency simulation
US20100089188A1 (en) Apparatus for and method of attaching a strain sensing element to a substrate
CN106670727A (en) Stretch-bending forming method of bi-directional web profile frame
Pater Tools optimisation in cross-wedge rolling
JP2007130671A (en) Program for twist determination and correction in pressing, and its method
US10940518B2 (en) Manufacturing method for press-formed article
CN109241560B (en) Treatment method of steel structure fiber model
KR101501336B1 (en) Inside edge structure of ship block
CN106257087B (en) A kind of monoblock type is empty, the real reinforcement to rubber nodal point
Borah et al. Estimation of springback in double-curvature forming of plates: experimental evaluation and process modeling
Wagner et al. Development of a 15 MN build-up system for calibrations in Ukraine’s heavy industry

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant