CN111539167B - Layout method of ultra-large-scale integrated circuit considering atomization and proximity effect - Google Patents
Layout method of ultra-large-scale integrated circuit considering atomization and proximity effect Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111539167B CN111539167B CN202010329234.6A CN202010329234A CN111539167B CN 111539167 B CN111539167 B CN 111539167B CN 202010329234 A CN202010329234 A CN 202010329234A CN 111539167 B CN111539167 B CN 111539167B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- effect
- atomization
- proximity
- equation
- layout
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/30—Circuit design
- G06F30/32—Circuit design at the digital level
- G06F30/33—Design verification, e.g. functional simulation or model checking
- G06F30/3308—Design verification, e.g. functional simulation or model checking using simulation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/30—Circuit design
- G06F30/39—Circuit design at the physical level
- G06F30/392—Floor-planning or layout, e.g. partitioning or placement
Abstract
The invention relates to a layout method of a very large scale integrated circuit (VLSI) considering atomization and proximity effect, which comprises the following steps: (1) Establishing an energy distribution model for atomization and proximity effect in the electron beam lithography EBL and describing the change of the energy distribution model; (2) Optimizing a model and a function in the global layout and determining a smooth target function; (3) Introducing new variables solves the unconstrained minimization problem into a separable minimization problem with linear constraints, CSMP; (4) Determining a neighbor set ADMM algorithm and an iterative formula for the separable minimization problem; (5) solving two sub-problems in the neighbor set iteration; and (6) carrying out convergence analysis on the adjacent group ADMM algorithm. The method is beneficial to reducing adverse effects caused by atomization and proximity effects and improving layout efficiency.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of design of a very large scale integrated circuit, and particularly relates to a layout method of the very large scale integrated circuit considering atomization and proximity effect.
Background
Since EBL can print fine patterns, it is used for sub-22 nm process nodes and above. The electron gun directly emits electrons through a set of lenses and apertures to pattern the wafer. When the primary electron beam emitted by the electron gun hits the resistor and the substrate, the electrons may scatter. The scattered electrons produce backscattered electrons that may hit the bottom of the objective lens. Thus, the impact may generate next generation electrons, so-called re-scattered electrons. These scattered, backscattered and re-scattered electrons may cause unwanted exposure, leading to proximity effects and fogging effects.
The proximity effect is produced by scattered and backscattered electrons. More specifically, the scattered electrons (forward scattered electrons) cause a forward proximity effect, i.e., small angular deflection of electrons as they enter the photoresist and substrate. In contrast, backscattered electrons (called backscattered electrons) produce a backward proximity effect, which is usually deflected at large angles. In addition, the backscattered electrons may leave the resistor, strike the bottom of the objective lens, and bounce back into the resistor again, thereby generating backscattered electrons. The re-scattered electrons are dispersed a few millimeters away from the main exposure point. These re-scattered electrons can cause overexposure, resulting in a change in the layout pattern, known as a fogging effect.
Some published papers address the critical fogging and proximity effects, but most of them deal with these two effects at the manufacturing process or post-layout stage. Shimomura et al address the fogging effect by adding a scattered electron absorbing plate. Hudek and Bayer use a series of experimental data to determine the optimal parameters for the proximity effect, and a software tool (called "PROX-In") was developed to determine an optimal control point spread function to correct for the proximity effect. However, post-layout corrections are very time consuming. In addition to long run times, to ensure accuracy in critical dimensions, a large amount of data in bitmaps is required.
To address the fogging effect earlier, huang and Chang proposed the first chip-level layout algorithm to minimize the fogging variation on the chip. The basic idea is to arrange the intervals under the guidance of the atomization model to minimize the atomization variation during the arrangement. The atomization model is an accurate evaluation scheme for estimating the atomization effect by using a fast gaussian transformation. The experimental results show that the methods achieve high resolution. However, this work does not take into account the critical proximity effect. Another problem is that the run time is 2.44 times longer than for the layout method without taking into account the fogging effect. Therefore, an efficient algorithm needs to be designed to handle both critical fogging effects and proximity effects.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a layout method of a very large scale integrated circuit considering the atomization and proximity effects, which is beneficial to reducing the adverse effects caused by the atomization and proximity effects and improving the layout efficiency.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention adopts the technical scheme that: a method for placement of a very large scale integrated circuit (vlsi) that accounts for blooming and proximity effects, comprising the steps of:
(1) Establishing an energy distribution model for atomization and proximity effect in the electron beam lithography EBL and describing the change of the energy distribution model;
(2) Optimizing models and functions in the global layout and determining a smooth target function F (x, y);
(3) Introduction of new variables minimizes the problem without constraintsTo the separable minimization problem CSMP with linear constraints;
(4) Determining a neighbor set ADMM algorithm and an iterative formula for the separable minimization problem;
(5) Solving two sub-problems in the neighbor set iteration;
(6) Convergence analysis was performed on the neighborhood set ADMM algorithm.
Further, in the step (1), in the EBL, the fogging effect and the proximity effect are modeled as a gaussian distribution and a double gaussian function, respectively, f fog (d) Fogging effect and proximity effect f pro (d) The mathematical models of (a) are respectively:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,is the distance from the point of incidence, beta F 、β f And beta b The atomization effect action range, the forward proximity effect and the backward proximity effect; v. of F Is a parameter related to the weight of the fogging effect; η is the ratio of the backscattered energy to the forward energy;
for the fogging effect, an evaluation point t is given i And a set of sources affected by the pointThe evaluation scheme was calculated by fast gaussian transformation as:
wherein q is j Is a j Weight of (d), δ a Is a normal number; also, the forward proximity effect and the backward proximity effect are calculated by:
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,andare the set of sources of occurrence caused by forward and backward directions, respectively, at the evaluation point t i Has an approximate effect;
the above evaluation scheme was used to estimate the FPE: let the evaluation point beThey are evenly distributed over the entire layout and the variation in the fogging effect is calculated by:
the change in proximity effect is calculated by:
wherein, x and y is the sum of x and of the generation source y And (4) coordinates.
Further, in the step (2), in the global layout, the line length and the density function are not smooth, and a logarithm model and a line length model are usedAnd bell functionApproximate total semi-perimeter line length and smooth density function respectively; the global layout problem is formulated as a smooth constraint minimization problem, as follows:
wherein, M b Is the maximum allowable area of the mobile unit in the binb;
to optimize variation in atomization and proximity effects while maintaining good layout line length and density, the objective function of the layout is defined as:
wherein λ is 1 、λ 2 、λ 3 And λ 4 As weights, the weights are continuously updated to search for the optimal positions of all circuit units in the iterative process;
by introducing two new variables (g, h), the problem of unconstrained minimization is solvedFurther formulated as a separable minimization problem with linear constraints as follows:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,representing line length and density constraints, theta 2 (g,h)=λ 3 S f (g,h)+λ 4 S p (q, h) represents atomization and proximity change; this formula separates the atomization and proximity variations from line length and density constraints.
Further, in the step (3), the lagrangian function related to the minimization problem of equation (5) is:
wherein, the augmented Lagrange multiplier method is as follows:
the minimization problem of equation (5) is solved with the near end set ADMM: given aThe near-end set of minimization problems ADMM of equation (5) generates the next iteration based on the enhanced Lagrangian function (6) by the following equation
In the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,andis an approximation term; the method divides original variables into two types of (x, y) and (g, h), and then adopts near-end ADMM to solve two solving problems; in each iteration of the near-end set ADMM, there are two sub-problems to be solved, sub-problem of equation (7) and sub-problem of equation (8), respectively;
for the sub-problem of equation (7), the steepest descent method is used to minimize line length and density constraint violations; according to the first order requirement for optimality, it follows from equation (7):
and
this results in the steepest descent step of the form:
order:
and
firstly, there are:
the calculation of equation (12), namely:
since both the fogging and the proximity effect are the sum of the associated gaussian distribution functions, S is obtained by the same method f (g,h t ) And S p (g,h t ) Partial derivatives of (d); s f (g,h t ) The partial derivative of (a) is described as:
the average is divided into two parts as above: one is the average of the fraction that is mainly affected by the fogging effect and the other is the average of the fraction that is mainly unaffected by the fogging effect; since the average value is not mainly affected by the atomization effect, the average value is regarded as a constant and is expressed as E, namely, a surrounding grid is selected to calculate an average effect change value; then, there are:
wherein, the first and the second end of the pipe are connected with each other,is the evaluation point t i The coordinates of (a);
will be evaluated at point t i The window of influence is denoted Γ; the exponential function is approximated using an integration method to yield:
wherein w Γ 、h Γ And R Γ The width, height and boundaries of the window Γ, respectively; t is t i Is an evaluation point, a i Located in its area of influence;
to estimate in equation (15)The value of (A) is determined by the boundary determining principle, and comprises the following steps:
substituting equations (16), (17) and (18) into (15) yields:
following the procedures of equations (14) to (20), the following are calculated:
namely:
also, the following were obtained:
compared with the prior art, the invention has the following beneficial effects: 1) The present invention represents the global layout problem that reduces the effects of fogging and proximity effects as a separable linear constraint minimization problem, which greatly reduces the complexity of the optimization problem. 2. The invention provides a new adjacent group ADMM algorithm to solve the separable minimization problem. To take advantage of the separable-recurrence formula, two sub-problems are solved at a lower computational cost in each iteration of the method. 3) The invention guarantees the global convergence to the first-order critical point under two reliable assumptions, and provides theoretical guarantee for the quality of the generated solution. 4. The invention can effectively solve the VLSI layout problem considering atomization and proximity effect. Experimental results show that the method is effective and efficient for solving the problems. Compared with the most advanced algorithm at present, the method not only reduces the influence caused by 13.4% of atomization effect and 21.4% of proximity effect, but also accelerates by 1.65 times.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method implementation of an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The invention is further described with reference to the following figures and specific embodiments.
The invention provides a layout method of a very large scale integrated circuit considering atomization and proximity effects, which solves the VLSI layout problem considering the atomization and proximity effects, further reduces adverse effects brought by the atomization and proximity effects and improves layout efficiency. The basic idea of this approach is to first formulate the global layout problem as a separable linear constraint minimization problem. According to the energy model of the atomization and the proximity effect, the targets in the energy model are solved one by one in an alternating mode, the proximity group is written out and solved, the complexity of the optimization problem is greatly reduced, and meanwhile, the calculation cost is reduced, so that the influence caused by the atomization and the proximity effect is effectively reduced. In each iteration of the method, two sub-problems are solved with low computational cost. The first sub-problem (mainly related to line length and density) is solved by the steepest descent algorithm of wireless search, while the second sub-problem (mainly related to atomization and proximity effects) is solved approximately by some approximation technique with analytical solutions. The method specifically comprises the following steps:
(1) The energy distribution is modeled and its variation is described for the fogging and proximity effects in Electron Beam Lithography (EBL).
(2) Models and functions in the global layout are optimized, and a smooth objective function F (x, y) is determined.
(3) Introduction of newProblem of variable unconstrained minimizationA separable minimization problem (CSMP) with linear constraints.
(4) A neighbor set ADMM algorithm and an iterative formula that can separate the minimization problem are determined.
(5) Two sub-problems in the neighbor set iteration are solved.
(6) Convergence analysis was performed on the neighborhood group ADMM algorithm.
Referring to fig. 1, fig. 1 is a flow chart of the method of the present invention. The mathematical model of the method is described as follows:
in EBL, the fogging effect and the proximity effect are modeled as a Gaussian distribution and a double Gaussian function, respectively, f fog (d) Fogging effect and proximity effect f pro (d) The mathematical models of (a) are respectively:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,is the distance from the point of incidence, beta F 、β f And beta b Are the fogging effect coverage, forward proximity effect and backward proximity effect. v. of F Is a parameter related to the weight of the fogging effect. η is the ratio of the backscattered energy to the forward energy. For the smallest size correctable, β F Is 20000 mu m, beta F Is 0.06 μm, beta b And 30 μm. The present invention proposes an effective and accurate evaluation scheme to estimate the fogging effect by fast gaussian transformation. In this scheme, each standard cell is considered as a source of occurrence, and evaluation points uniformly distributed over the entire layout are selected to estimate the variation of both effects (two adjacent evaluation points)The spacing therebetween is a constant, e.g., 5 μm).
For the fogging effect, an evaluation point t is given i And a set of sources affected by the pointThe evaluation scheme is calculated by fast gaussian transformation as:
wherein q is j Is a j Weight of δ a Is a normal number. Also, the forward proximity effect and the backward proximity effect are calculated by the following equation:
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,andare the set of sources of occurrence caused by forward and backward directions, respectively, at the evaluation point t i Has an approximate effect.
In the present invention, the above efficient and accurate evaluation scheme is used to estimate the FPE: let the evaluation point be They are evenly distributed over the entire layout and the variation in the fogging effect is calculated by:
the change in proximity effect is calculated by:
where x and y are the x and y coordinates of the generating source, such as the location of a standard cell.
In a global layout, both line length and density functions are not smooth, using log and line length modelsAnd bell functionApproximate total half perimeter line length (HPWL) and smooth density functions, respectively. The global layout problem is formulated as a smooth constraint minimization problem, as follows:
wherein M is b The maximum allowable area of the movable unit in the bin b.
To optimize variation in atomization and proximity effects while maintaining good layout line length and density, the objective function of the layout is defined as:
wherein λ is 1 、λ 2 、λ 3 And λ 4 For the weights, the weights are continuously updated to search all of them in an iterative processThe optimal position of the circuit unit.
By introducing two new variables (g, h), the unconstrained minimization problem is solvedFurther formulated as a separable minimization problem with linear constraints, as follows:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,denotes line length and density constraints, θ 2 (g,h)=λ 3 S f (g,h)+λ 4 S p (q, h) represents atomization and proximity change. This formula separates the atomization and proximity variation from line length and density constraints. In particular, the two objective functions can be optimized one by one in an alternating manner, which can significantly speed up the optimization process.
The ADMM algorithm is an efficient algorithm for the optimization problem of separable structures, especially for separable optimization problems with linear constraints. The present invention further proposes a novel near-end set of ADMMs to solve the minimization problem of equation (5) and to prove that the iterative sequence generated by the method converges to the first-order critical point of the minimization problem of equation (5).
The "Proximal group ADMM" section in FIG. 1 is specifically as follows:
in the step (3), the lagrangian function related to the minimization problem of equation (5) is:
wherein, the augmented Lagrange multiplier method is as follows:
the near end set ADMM is used to solve the minimization problem of equation (5): given theThe near-end set of minimization problems ADMM of equation (5) generates the next iteration based on the enhanced Lagrangian function (6) by the following equation
In the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,andis an approximation term. The method divides original variables into two types of (x, y) and (g, h), and then adopts near-end ADMM to solve two solving problems. In each iteration of the near-end set ADMM, there are two sub-problems to be solved, sub-problem of equation (7) and sub-problem of equation (8).
"wire & diversity Subproblem (7) in FIG. 1; solve (10) (11) by steeest facility method ", the concrete way is as follows:
for the sub-problem of equation (7), the steepest descent method is used to minimize line length and density constraint violations. According to the first order requirement for optimality, it follows from equation (7):
and
this results in the steepest descent step of the form:
"Fogging & promotion effects Subproblem (8) in FIG. 1; the Analytical solution of via (22) - (23) "section, in a specific manner is as follows:
order:
and
the subproblems of formula (8) correspond to min φ (g) andis a first order optimality condition ofAnd
firstly, there are:
the calculation of equation (12), namely:
since both the fogging and the proximity effect are the sum of the associated gaussian distribution functions, S is obtained by the same method f (g,h t ) And S p (g,h t ) The partial derivative of (c). S f (g,h t ) The partial derivative of (a) is described as:
the average is divided into two parts as above: one is the average of the fraction that is mainly affected by the fogging effect and the other is the average of the fraction that is mainly unaffected by the fogging effect. Since the mean value is largely unaffected by the fogging effect, it is considered constant and denoted as E, i.e. the surrounding grid is selected to calculate the mean effect variation value. Then, there are:
which is composed ofIs the evaluation point t i The coordinates of (a). The last equation holds becauseIndependent of g i 。
Will be evaluated at the point t i The window of influence is denoted Γ. The exponential function is approximated using an integration method to yield:
wherein, w Γ 、h Γ And R Γ Respectively the width, height and boundaries of the window Γ. t is t i Is an evaluation point, a i Located in its area of influence.
To estimate in equation (15)The value of (A) is determined by the boundary determining principle, and comprises the following steps:
substituting formulae (16), (17), and (18) into (15) yields:
following the procedures of equations (14) to (20), the following are calculated:
namely:
also, the following were obtained:
"legacy & modified placement" in FIG. 1; the Placement result section, in detail, follows:
for each illegal unit, the nearest and legal location is found to place the unit.
In the step (5), the critical point of the problem (5) satisfies the following equation by a first-order optimal condition:
by the neighbor set ADMM algorithm (alternating direction multiplier method) proposed earlier, the equation is obtained:
the following assumptions are made: 1) L is A Underlying within the chip area under consideration. 2)Andis continuous over (x, y) by Lipschitz, andandis continuous over (g, h) by Lipschitz. RepresentThen we have the following reasoning:
lesion 1) hypothetical sequence z t Is generated by the proposed method. Then, if the penalty parameters β > 0 and γ > 0 are sufficiently large, the function valueIn a sequence of (2), whereinAs long as L A With the lower bound, we can get the equation:
and
theorem 1) Generation of z from neighboring sets of ADMMs t It converges to the critical point of the problem.
And (3) proving that: by the introduction of 1, the method has the advantages that,H 0 is a place of a bounded set. Thus, { z t The are converged, with at least one converged subsequence. Suppose thatIs a convergent subsequence, andt i →+∞。
the following equations (25) to (30) and (31) to (32) give:
and
in the same way, the following can be obtained:
and
note that for any t, 1,t or more i Belonging to natural numbers, all the equations are true, and the two sides of the equation (25) - (30) are simultaneously paired with t i Take a limit, and, note when t i When it approaches 0Toward z, we have a limit point z that satisfies condition 24, so it is the dwell point for problem (5).
The above are preferred embodiments of the present invention, and all changes made according to the technical scheme of the present invention that produce functional effects do not exceed the scope of the technical scheme of the present invention belong to the protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (1)
1. A method for placement of a very large scale integrated circuit (vlsi) that accounts for fogging and proximity effects, comprising the steps of:
(1) Establishing an energy distribution model for atomization and proximity effects in the electron beam lithography EBL and describing the change of the energy distribution model;
(2) Optimizing models and functions in the global layout and determining a smooth target function F (x, y);
(3) Introduction of new variables minimizes the problem without constraintsTo the separable minimization problem with linear constraints, CSMP;
(4) Determining a neighbor set ADMM algorithm and an iterative formula for the separable minimization problem;
(5) Solving two sub-problems in the neighbor set iteration;
(6) Carrying out convergence analysis on the adjacent group ADMM algorithm;
in the step (1), in EBL, the atomization effect and the proximity effect are respectively modeled as Gaussian distribution and double Gaussian function, F fog (d) Fogging effect and proximity effect f pro (d) The mathematical models of (a) are respectively:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,is the distance from the point of incidence, beta F 、β f And beta b The atomization effect action range, the forward proximity effect and the backward proximity effect; upsilon is F Is a parameter related to the weight of the fogging effect; η is the ratio of the backscattered energy to the forward energy;
for the fogging effect, an evaluation point t is given i And a set of sources affected by the pointThe evaluation scheme is calculated by fast gaussian transformation as:
wherein q is j Is a j Weight of δ a Is a normal number; also, the forward proximity effect and the backward proximity effect are calculated by:
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,andare a set of sources of occurrence caused by the forward and backward directions, respectively, at an evaluation point t i Has an approximate effect;
the above evaluation scheme was used to estimate the FPE: let the evaluation point beThey are evenly distributed over the entire layout and the variation in the fogging effect is calculated by:
the change in proximity effect is calculated by:
wherein x and y are the x and y coordinates of the generating source;
in the step (2), in the global layout, the line length and the density function are not smooth, and a logarithm model and a line length model are usedAnd bell functionRespectively approximating a total semi-perimeter line length and a smooth density function; the global layout problem is formulated as a smooth constraint minimization problem, as follows:
wherein, M b Is the maximum allowable area of the movable unit in bin b;
to optimize the variation in atomization and proximity effects while maintaining good layout line length and density, the objective function of the layout is defined as:
wherein λ is 1 、λ 2 、λ 3 And λ 4 The weights are continuously updated to search the optimal positions of all circuit units in the iterative process;
by introducing two new variables (g, h), the problem of unconstrained minimization is solvedFurther formulated as a separable minimization problem with linear constraints as follows:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,denotes line length and density constraints, θ 2 (g,h)=λ 3 S f (g,h)+λ 4 S p (q, h) represents atomization and proximity change; this formula separates the atomization and proximity variations from line length and density constraints;
in the step (3), the lagrangian function related to the minimization problem of equation (5) is:
wherein, the augmented Lagrange multiplier method is as follows:
the minimization problem of equation (5) is solved with the near end set ADMM: given theThe near-end set of minimization problems ADMM of equation (5) generates the next iteration based on the enhanced Lagrangian function (6) by the following equation
In the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,andis an approximation term; the method divides original variables into two types of (x, y) and (g, h), and then adopts near-end ADMM to solve two solving problems; in each iteration of the near-end set ADMM, there are two sub-problems to be solved, sub-problem of equation (7) and sub-problem of equation (8), respectively;
for the sub-problem of equation (7), the steepest descent method is used to minimize line length and density constraint violations; according to the first order requirement for optimality, it follows from equation (7):
and
this results in the steepest descent step of the form:
order:
and
the subproblems of formula (8) correspond to min φ (g) andis a first order optimality condition ofAnd
first, there are:
the calculation of equation (12), namely:
since both the fogging and the proximity effect are the sum of the associated gaussian distribution functions, S is obtained by the same method f (g,h t ) And S p (g,h t ) Partial derivatives of (d); s f (g,h t ) The partial derivatives of (c) are described as:
the average is divided into two parts as above: one is the average of the fraction that is mainly affected by the fogging effect and the other is the average of the fraction that is mainly unaffected by the fogging effect; since the average value is not mainly affected by the atomization effect, the average value is regarded as a constant and is expressed as E, namely, a surrounding grid is selected to calculate an average effect change value; then, there are:
wherein the content of the first and second substances,is the evaluation point t i The coordinates of (a);
will be evaluated at the point t i The window of influence is denoted Γ; approximating the exponential function using an integral method yields:
wherein, w Γ 、h Γ And R Γ The width, height and boundaries of the window Γ, respectively; t is t i Is an evaluation point, a i Located in its area of influence;
substituting equations (16), (17) and (18) into (15) yields:
following the procedures of equations (14) to (20), the following are calculated:
namely:
also, there are obtained:
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010329234.6A CN111539167B (en) | 2020-04-23 | 2020-04-23 | Layout method of ultra-large-scale integrated circuit considering atomization and proximity effect |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010329234.6A CN111539167B (en) | 2020-04-23 | 2020-04-23 | Layout method of ultra-large-scale integrated circuit considering atomization and proximity effect |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN111539167A CN111539167A (en) | 2020-08-14 |
CN111539167B true CN111539167B (en) | 2023-02-21 |
Family
ID=71979024
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010329234.6A Active CN111539167B (en) | 2020-04-23 | 2020-04-23 | Layout method of ultra-large-scale integrated circuit considering atomization and proximity effect |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN111539167B (en) |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN106980730A (en) * | 2017-03-31 | 2017-07-25 | 福州大学 | VLSI standard cell placement methods based on direct solution technology |
CN107526860A (en) * | 2017-03-31 | 2017-12-29 | 福州大学 | VLSI standard cell placement methods based on electric field energy modeling technique |
CN108763777A (en) * | 2018-05-30 | 2018-11-06 | 福州大学 | VLSI global wiring method for establishing model based on Poisson's equation explicit solution |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7743358B2 (en) * | 2005-04-29 | 2010-06-22 | Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | Apparatus and method for segmenting edges for optical proximity correction |
-
2020
- 2020-04-23 CN CN202010329234.6A patent/CN111539167B/en active Active
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN106980730A (en) * | 2017-03-31 | 2017-07-25 | 福州大学 | VLSI standard cell placement methods based on direct solution technology |
CN107526860A (en) * | 2017-03-31 | 2017-12-29 | 福州大学 | VLSI standard cell placement methods based on electric field energy modeling technique |
CN108763777A (en) * | 2018-05-30 | 2018-11-06 | 福州大学 | VLSI global wiring method for establishing model based on Poisson's equation explicit solution |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN111539167A (en) | 2020-08-14 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JP5525798B2 (en) | Charged particle beam drawing apparatus and method for correcting charging effect thereof | |
JP4814651B2 (en) | Charged particle beam exposure method and program used therefor | |
US10381194B2 (en) | Charged particle beam writing apparatus and charged particle beam writing method | |
US6313476B1 (en) | Charged beam lithography system | |
KR101614111B1 (en) | Charged particle beam writing device and method for acquiring dose modulation coefficient | |
JP3192157B2 (en) | Electron beam writing method and writing apparatus | |
JP4714591B2 (en) | Pattern area value calculation method, proximity effect correction method, and charged particle beam drawing method | |
TWI611250B (en) | Charged particle beam drawing device and charged particle beam drawing method | |
KR20180035178A (en) | Electron beam apparatus and positional displacement correcting method of electron beam | |
JP5616674B2 (en) | Charged particle beam drawing apparatus and charged particle beam drawing method | |
JP4551243B2 (en) | Exposure data generation apparatus and method | |
JP2012060054A (en) | Lithography method of charged particle beam lithography device and charged particle beam lithography device | |
TW202223547A (en) | Methods and systems to determine shapes for semiconductor or flat panel display fabrication | |
TWI730353B (en) | Charged particle beam drawing device and charged particle beam drawing method | |
CN111539167B (en) | Layout method of ultra-large-scale integrated circuit considering atomization and proximity effect | |
Ivanov et al. | ULTRASAM-2D code for simulation of electron guns with ultra high precision | |
JP3508617B2 (en) | Electron beam drawing apparatus and drawing method using electron beam | |
KR101352997B1 (en) | Charged particle beam writing apparatus and charged particle beam writing method | |
JP5620725B2 (en) | Charged particle beam drawing apparatus and charged particle beam drawing method | |
KR20130110034A (en) | Charged particle beam writing apparatus and charged particle beam writing method | |
KR102238893B1 (en) | Electron beam irradiation method, electron beam irradiation apparatus and non-transitory computer readable medium recoridng program | |
JP2002313693A (en) | Forming method for mask pattern | |
JP2004048018A (en) | Electron beam lithography system and method of drawing using electron beam | |
TWI597764B (en) | Charged particle beam drawing device and charged particle beam drawing method | |
KR20200141494A (en) | Charged particle beam drawing apparatus, charged particle beam drawing method and program |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
CB03 | Change of inventor or designer information | ||
CB03 | Change of inventor or designer information |
Inventor after: Chen Jianli Inventor after: Lin Zhifeng Inventor after: Huang Zhipeng Inventor before: Chen Jianli Inventor before: Lin Zhifeng Inventor before: Huang Zhipeng |