CN111472730A - Large-section multi-cluster fracturing perforation scheme determination method - Google Patents
Large-section multi-cluster fracturing perforation scheme determination method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111472730A CN111472730A CN202010373494.3A CN202010373494A CN111472730A CN 111472730 A CN111472730 A CN 111472730A CN 202010373494 A CN202010373494 A CN 202010373494A CN 111472730 A CN111472730 A CN 111472730A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- perforation
- cluster
- fracturing
- fracture
- determining
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/11—Perforators; Permeators
- E21B43/114—Perforators using direct fluid action on the wall to be perforated, e.g. abrasive jets
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/25—Methods for stimulating production
- E21B43/26—Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/25—Methods for stimulating production
- E21B43/26—Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures
- E21B43/267—Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures reinforcing fractures by propping
Abstract
The invention provides a method for determining a perforation scheme of large-section multi-cluster fracturing. The method for determining the perforation scheme of the large-section multi-cluster fracturing comprises the following steps: step S1: establishing a fracturing section model; step S2: determining the liquid distribution and the fracture form of the fracturing section model; step S3: determining the distribution amount of the proppant of the fracturing section model; step S4: determining the erosion efficiency of a perforation blasthole of a fracturing section, the diameter of the blasthole after erosion and a flow coefficient; step S5: a perforation plan for the final fracture is determined. The invention solves the problem that the perforation distribution scheme in the horizontal well staged multi-cluster fracturing process in the prior art cannot meet the requirement of uniform expansion of large-section multi-cluster fractures at the same time.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of oil exploitation, in particular to a method for determining a perforation scheme of large-section multi-cluster fracturing.
Background
The horizontal well staged multi-cluster fracturing technology is one of the main technologies for developing the unconventional oil and gas reservoirs at present, realizes synchronous expansion of a plurality of hydraulic fractures through multi-cluster fracturing in a stage, realizes a high-flow-guide fracture channel in the unconventional reservoir, increases the seepage capability of the reservoir and realizes the production increase and modification of the unconventional oil and gas reservoirs. The conventional staged fracturing technology adopts bridge plug perforation fracturing as a main body transformation process, the current domestic oil field transformation scale generally needs 25 transformation sections under the condition of the transformation section length, the distance between the sections is 70-80 meters, the distance between clusters is 30-45 meters, 2-3 clusters are realized in the sections, the horizontal well section length is generally 1500-1800 meters, the number of bridge plugs is about 24, the great increase of the using amount of the bridge plugs can cause the difficulty of producing the drill plugs after fracturing, the drill plugs not only need to consume the construction time, but also can cause formation leakage and the failure of bridge plug fragments to be discharged back, particularly for compact oil reservoirs with low temperature and poor natural crack development, the formation leakage and thick oil adsorption phenomena of the oil reservoirs are more serious, the risk of the drill plugs is greatly improved, therefore, in order to reduce the risk of the reservoir reservoirs and the number of the bridge plugs, a new horizontal well perforation transformation scheme is provided for unconventional oil reservoirs at home and abroad, namely, the large transformation section multi-cluster fracturing is provided, generally, the single-section reconstruction section can reach 150-200 m, and the number of perforation clusters in the section is 5-15 clusters.
The perforation scheme design of large-section multi-cluster fracturing is to increase the section spacing and the number of perforation clusters in a section on the basis of the traditional staged fracturing, and the difficulty is how to effectively realize the uniform and stable expansion of each cluster of cracks in a large-modification section. The common technological techniques for large-stage multi-cluster fracturing mainly include a flow-limiting method and a chemical temporary plugging diversion method. The flow-limiting fracturing process technology is developed in the middle of eighties, and the technical core of the flow-limiting fracturing process technology is reasonable sectional hole distribution and optimized fracturing process design. The current-limiting fracturing is a process of strictly perforating a fracturing target layer at low density, increasing construction discharge capacity as high as possible, greatly improving bottom hole pressure by utilizing blast hole abrasion resistance generated when a fracturing fluid is absorbed by a fracturing layer firstly, forcing the fracturing fluid to be shunted, enabling each perforation cluster to be uniformly reformed, and finally sequentially adding sand and supporting all cracks. The flow-limiting method has the advantages of clear technical principle, relatively simple design, capability of ensuring that the fixed-point perforation can ensure that the crack is generated at the most favorable position and small damage to the casing and the cement sheath.
Because the liquid quantity distribution and the sand quantity distribution are respectively uneven, the erosion phenomenon of each cluster of perforation is extremely uneven in the hydraulic fracturing process, and the uniform development of each cluster of cracks cannot be met under the uniform perforation. An optimization method for a large-section multi-cluster fracturing perforation scheme needs to be designed, flow distribution unevenness under the effect of inter-seam interference and sand distribution unevenness under the effect of shaft flowing can be calculated respectively, and then the phenomenon of erosion unevenness caused by different sand concentrations in sand carrying liquid at each perforation position is considered, so that the fracture morphology under the perforation scheme is obtained. Then, the fracture morphology under the scheme can be obtained by changing the perforation phase angle, the perforation diameter and the perforation density of each cluster of perforation, and the perforation scheme under the large-section multi-cluster is optimized so as to open each cluster of fracture to the maximum extent.
Therefore, the problem that the perforation distribution scheme in the staged multi-cluster fracturing process of the horizontal well in the prior art cannot meet the requirement of simultaneous uniform expansion of large-section multi-cluster fractures exists.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention mainly aims to provide a method for determining a perforation scheme of large-section multi-cluster fracturing, which aims to solve the problem that the perforation distribution scheme in the horizontal well staged multi-cluster fracturing process in the prior art cannot meet the requirement of simultaneous uniform expansion of large-section multi-cluster fractures.
In order to achieve the above object, according to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a perforation plan determination method for a large-interval multi-cluster fracture, comprising: step S1: establishing a fracturing section model; step S2: determining the liquid distribution and the fracture form of the fracturing section model; step S3: determining the distribution amount of the proppant of the fracturing section model; step S4: determining the erosion efficiency of a perforation blasthole of a fracturing section model, the diameter of the blasthole after erosion and a flow coefficient; step S5: a perforation plan for the final fracture is determined.
Further, the fracture zone model includes a geological model and a wellbore model.
Further, the geological model and the well casing model have parameters at least including the length of the reconstruction section, the number of perforation clusters in the reconstruction section, the perforation shape of each perforation cluster, the flow coefficient of the perforations, and the displacement of injected liquid.
Further, the perforation configuration includes the aperture of the perforation and the flow coefficient of the perforation.
Further, in step S3, a distribution amount of proppant for each perforation cluster is determined according to the fluid distribution of each perforation cluster to determine a distribution amount of proppant for the fracture zone model.
Further, in step S4, the fluid flow rate obtained in step S2 and the dispensed amount of proppant obtained in step S3 are respectively substituted into formula (1) and formula (2),
wherein Q isiIs the fluid flow rate, C, of the ith perforation of the perforation cluster obtained in step S2p,iIs the proppant distribution amount, C, of the ith perforation of the perforation cluster obtained in step S3dIs the flow coefficient of the perforation, and the initial flow coefficient is 0.56,
is the flow coefficient of the complete erosion of the perforation, D is the diameter of the perforation, Cdα, β are wellbore and perforation parameters.
Further, the method for determining the perforation scheme of the large-section multi-cluster fracturing further comprises the following steps: before determining the perforation scheme of the final fracturing segment, repeating the steps S1 to S4 to obtain the fracture morphology of each perforation cluster of the fracturing segment model at the final moment under the dynamic erosion condition.
Further, the fracture morphology at least comprises fracture length, fracture width and fracture liquid inlet amount.
Further, step S5 includes: and after the fracture morphology of each perforation cluster of the fracturing section model at the final moment under the dynamic erosion condition is obtained, determining the perforation scheme of the final fracturing section according to the comparison condition.
Further, the comparison conditions include at least reservoir conditions and field conditions.
By applying the technical scheme of the invention, the method for determining the perforation scheme of the large-section multi-cluster fracturing comprises the following steps: step S1: establishing a fracturing section model; step S2: determining the liquid distribution and the fracture form of the fracturing section model; step S3: determining the distribution amount of the proppant of the fracturing section model; step S4: determining the erosion efficiency of a perforation blasthole of a fracturing section model, the diameter of the blasthole after erosion and a flow coefficient; step S5: a perforation plan for the final fracture is determined.
In the scheme, by using the method for determining the perforation scheme of the large-section multi-cluster fracturing, the problem that the perforation distribution scheme in the horizontal well staged multi-cluster fracturing process in the prior art cannot meet the requirement of simultaneous uniform expansion of large-section multi-cluster fractures can be effectively solved by considering the erosion influence of the propping agent and the influence of mutual interference during the expansion of multiple perforation clusters.
Drawings
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this application, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the invention and not to limit the invention. In the drawings:
FIG. 1 illustrates a flow diagram of a method for determining a perforation plan for a large interval multiple cluster fracture, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
It should be noted that the embodiments and features of the embodiments in the present application may be combined with each other without conflict. The present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the embodiments with reference to the attached drawings.
It is noted that, unless otherwise indicated, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this application belongs.
In the present invention, unless specified to the contrary, use of the terms of orientation such as "upper, lower, top, bottom" or the like, generally refer to the orientation as shown in the drawings, or to the component itself in a vertical, perpendicular, or gravitational orientation; likewise, for ease of understanding and description, "inner and outer" refer to the inner and outer relative to the profile of the components themselves, but the above directional words are not intended to limit the invention.
In order to solve the problem that a perforation distribution scheme in the horizontal well staged multi-cluster fracturing process in the prior art cannot meet the requirement of simultaneous uniform expansion of large-section multi-cluster fractures, the application provides a method for determining a large-section multi-cluster fracturing perforation scheme.
As shown in fig. 1, the perforation scheme determination method for large-interval multi-cluster fracturing in the present application includes: step S1: establishing a fracturing section model; step S2: determining the liquid distribution and the fracture form of the fracturing section model; step S3: determining the distribution amount of the proppant of the fracturing section model; step S4: determining the erosion efficiency of a perforation blasthole of a fracturing section, the diameter of the blasthole after erosion and a flow coefficient; step S5: a perforation plan for the final fracture is determined.
In the scheme, by using the method for determining the perforation scheme of the large-section multi-cluster fracturing, the problem that the perforation distribution scheme in the horizontal well staged multi-cluster fracturing process in the prior art cannot meet the requirement of simultaneous uniform expansion of large-section multi-cluster fractures can be effectively solved by considering the erosion influence of the propping agent and the influence of mutual interference during the expansion of multiple perforation clusters.
Specifically, the fracture zone model includes a geological model and a wellbore model.
In step S2, when determining the fluid distribution and fracture morphology of the fracture zone model, the fluid distribution and fracture morphology of each fracture or perforation cluster in the modified zone need to be calculated.
In one embodiment of the present application, the fluid flow distribution within a multi-cluster fracture or perforation cluster should satisfy the mass conservation equation and the pressure continuity equation, namely:
BHP＝Shmin,i+ΔPs,i+ΔPpf,iformula (4)
Wherein Q isTIs the total injection amount of the fracturing fluid, unit m3/min；QiIs the injection flow rate of the ith perforation cluster in m3Min, BHP is bottom hole flowing pressure in MPa, △ Ps, i is the wellbore friction resistance of the ith fracture and the initial point of injection liquid in MPa, △ PpfI is the perforation friction resistance pressure of the ith crack in MPa; the calculation formula is as follows:
wherein N ispf,iIs the number of perforations in the ith cluster; dpf,iIs the ith shower hole diameter in m; cd,iIs the ith shower orifice flow coefficient, initialThe time is 0.56; f. ofrIs the wellbore friction coefficient, available through domestic and foreign literature (Bird et al, 2007); dwIs the diameter of the well bore LwThe length of the ith cluster of cracks from the length of the well bore at the injection starting point; v. offIs the fluid flow rate in the wellbore.
Formula (3) and formula (4) share unknowns N +1 (Q)1，Q2，Q3……QnBHP), equations N +1 (equation (4) contains N equations), which can be solved iteratively by Newton-Raphson, as follows:
vector of unknowns QTSum function margin fTCan be expressed as:
QT＝[Q1,Q2,…,Qn,BHP]formula (7)
fT＝[f1,f2,…，fn,fn+1]Formula (8)
fi＝BHP-(Shmin,i+Δpf,i+Δppf,i) (i ═ 1,2, …, n) formula (9)
Function margin fTIs a flow vector Q characterizing the current unknownTMargin of error in accuracy if fTIf | is 0, the current solution is an accurate solution of the equation set; if | fT| > 0, new iteration flow QTCan be expressed as:
Qt+1 T＝Qt T-[J]t -1ft Tformula (11)
Wherein [ J ]]Is a Jacobian matrix, Qt+1 TIs the traffic matrix at time t + 1; qTIs the traffic matrix at time t; f. oft TIs the flow error margin at time t.
Solving forThe liquid inlet flow distribution of each cluster of cracks at the moment can be obtained through the equation set. Obtaining the liquid inlet flow distribution quantity Q of each cluster of cracks1，Q2，Q3……QnThe expansion form of each crack can be obtained by a PKN method, including the half length L of the expansion crack and the net pressure P of fluid in the cracknetAnd the crack width w and other crack parameters are calculated according to the following formula:
Vi(t+1)＝Vi(t)+Qi(t +1) dt formula (16)
Wherein w is the crack width; pnetObtaining the net pressure in the crack in the initial calculation step and the net pressure in the crack after the crack starts to expand by respectively using formulas (14) and (15) according to the calculation step; qiIs the fracture flow rate, L is the fracture length, ViIs the ith fracture inflow volume; epIs the young's modulus of the rock.
Specifically, the geological model and the well casing model have parameters at least including the length of the reconstruction segment, the number of perforation clusters in the reconstruction segment, the perforation shape of each perforation cluster, the flow coefficient of the perforations, and the displacement of injected liquid.
In particular, the perforation configuration includes the aperture of the perforation and the flow coefficient of the perforation.
It should be further noted that, in step S3, the fracture zone model obtained in step S1 may be subjected to volume discretization, each proppant distribution condition is in accordance with computational fluid dynamics — discrete element (CFD-DEM) coupled solution, and each volume discrete grid satisfies the mass conservation law and the Navier-Stokes equation of finite volume:
wherein, αfIs the fluid phase volume fraction of the CFD mesh; rhofIs fluid phase fluid density, kg/m3；vfIs the flow velocity of the fluid, m/s;
is the stress tensor of the fluid phase; rRfIs the momentum exchange term of the proppant with the fluid, calculated by the drag force of the proppant particles of the discrete grid, through the particle velocity v within the discrete gridpAnd calculating according to the following formula:
Rpf＝Kpf(νf-νp) Formula (19)
Wherein, Fd,iIs a drag force acting on the proppant particles i, and the detailed calculation formula can be found in the domestic literature of the prior scholars due to more space of the calculation formula (Zhou et al 2010); vcellIs the volume of the discrete mesh.
By the formula, the relation F between the fluid distribution and the proppant distribution of each perforation cluster in the shaft model can be calculated, and the proppant flow C of the ith fracture cluster at the momentp,iComprises the following steps:
Cp,i＝F·Qiformula (21)
Specifically, in step S3, the distribution amount of proppant of each perforation cluster is determined according to the fluid distribution of each perforation cluster to determine the distribution amount of proppant of the fracture zone model.
Specifically, in step S4, the fluid flow rate obtained in step S2 and the dispensed amount of proppant obtained in step S3 are substituted into formula (1) and formula (2), respectively,
wherein Q isiIs the fluid flow rate in m of the ith perforation of the perforation cluster obtained in step S23/min；Cp,iIs the proppant distribution amount, C, of the ith perforation of the perforation cluster obtained in step S3dIs the flow coefficient of the perforation, and the initial flow coefficient is 0.56,
the flow coefficient is that the perforation erosion is complete, D is the perforation diameter, unit m; cdα, β are wellbore and perforation parameters, specific parameters are found in literature (L ong et al.
Specifically, the method for determining the perforation scheme of the large-section multi-cluster fracturing further comprises the following steps: before determining the perforation scheme of the final fracturing segment, repeating the steps S1 to S4 to obtain the fracture morphology of each perforation cluster of the fracturing segment model at the final moment under the dynamic erosion condition.
Specifically, the fracture morphology includes at least fracture length, fracture width, and fracture feed volume.
Specifically, step S5 includes: and after the fracture morphology of each perforation cluster of the fracturing section model at the final moment under the dynamic erosion condition is obtained, determining the perforation scheme of the final fracturing section according to the comparison condition.
Specifically, the comparison conditions include at least reservoir conditions and field conditions.
From the above description, it can be seen that the above-described embodiments of the present invention achieve the following technical effects:
1. compared with a natural fracture fractal theory, the conglomerate fractal factor is introduced, so that the simulation result is more accurate;
2. the defect that only simple double-wing gaps are generated by a conventional simulation method is overcome.
It is to be understood that the above-described embodiments are only a few, but not all, embodiments of the present invention. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
It is noted that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of example embodiments according to the present application. As used herein, the singular is intended to include the plural unless the context clearly dictates otherwise, and it should be further understood that the terms "comprises" and/or "comprising," when used in this specification, specify the presence of features, steps, operations, devices, components, and/or combinations thereof.
It should be noted that the terms "first," "second," and the like in the description and claims of this application and in the drawings described above are used for distinguishing between similar elements and not necessarily for describing a particular sequential or chronological order. It is to be understood that the data so used is interchangeable under appropriate circumstances such that the embodiments of the application described herein are capable of operation in sequences other than those illustrated or described herein.
The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention and is not intended to limit the present invention, and various modifications and changes may be made by those skilled in the art. Any modification, equivalent replacement, or improvement made within the spirit and principle of the present invention should be included in the protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. A method for determining a perforation scheme of large-section multi-cluster fracturing is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step S1: establishing a fracturing section model;
step S2: determining the liquid distribution and the fracture morphology of the fracturing section model;
step S3: determining a distribution amount of proppant of the fracture section model;
step S4: determining the perforation blasthole erosion efficiency, the diameter of the blasthole after erosion and a flow coefficient of the fracturing section model;
step S5: a perforation plan for the final fracture is determined.
2. The method for perforating pattern determination for a large interval multiple cluster fracture of claim 1 wherein the fracture interval model comprises a geological model and a wellbore model.
3. The method for perforating pattern determination for large scale multi-cluster fracturing of claim 2 wherein the geological model and the wellbore model have parameters that include at least the length of the modified interval, the number of perforation clusters in the modified interval, the perforation configuration of each of the perforation clusters, the flow coefficient of the perforations, and the displacement of injected fluid.
4. The method for perforating pattern determination for large scale multiple cluster fracturing of claim 3 wherein the perforation configuration comprises the aperture of the perforations and the flow coefficient of the perforations.
5. The perforating scheme determination method for large interval multi-cluster fracturing as claimed in claim 3 wherein in said step S3, the distribution amount of proppant of each said perforation cluster is determined according to the fluid distribution of each said perforation cluster to determine the distribution amount of proppant of said fracture interval model.
6. The perforating scheme determination method for large multi-cluster fracturing as claimed in claim 1, wherein in said step S4, the fluid flow rate obtained in said step S2 and the distribution amount of said proppant obtained in said step S3 are respectively substituted into formula (1) and formula (2),
wherein Q isiIs the fluid flow rate, C, of the ith perforation of the perforation cluster obtained in the step S2p,iIs the distribution amount of proppant, C, of the ith perforation of said perforation cluster obtained in said step S3dIs the flow coefficient of the perforation, and the initial flow coefficient is 0.56,
is the flow coefficient of the complete erosion of the perforation, D is the diameter of the perforation, Cdα, β are wellbore and perforation parameters.
7. The method for determining a perforation plan for a large interval multiple cluster fracturing as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 6, further comprising: before determining the perforation scheme of the final fracturing section, repeating the steps S1 to S4 to obtain the fracture morphology of each perforation cluster of the fracturing section model at the final moment under the dynamic erosion condition.
8. The method for perforating pattern determination for large scale multiple cluster fracturing of claim 7 wherein the fracture morphology comprises at least fracture length, fracture width, and fracture fluid entry amount.
9. The method for determining a perforation plan for a large interval multiple cluster fracturing of claim 7, wherein the step S5 comprises: and after the fracture morphology of each perforation cluster of the fracturing section model at the final moment under the dynamic erosion condition is obtained, determining the perforation scheme of the final fracturing section according to the comparison condition.
10. The method for perforating pattern determination for a large interval multiple cluster fracture as claimed in claim 9 wherein said contrasting conditions comprise at least reservoir conditions and field conditions.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010373494.3A CN111472730B (en) | 2020-05-06 | 2020-05-06 | Large-section multi-cluster fracturing perforation scheme determination method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010373494.3A CN111472730B (en) | 2020-05-06 | 2020-05-06 | Large-section multi-cluster fracturing perforation scheme determination method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN111472730A true CN111472730A (en) | 2020-07-31 |
| CN111472730B CN111472730B (en) | 2022-07-05 |
Family
ID=71757260
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010373494.3A Active CN111472730B (en) | 2020-05-06 | 2020-05-06 | Large-section multi-cluster fracturing perforation scheme determination method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN111472730B (en) |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112630404A (en) * | 2020-10-29 | 2021-04-09 | 中国石油大学(北京) | Method for calculating perforation flow under condition of large-section multi-cluster and method for evaluating fracturing effect |
| CN112945703A (en) * | 2021-02-04 | 2021-06-11 | 西南石油大学 | Liquid-solid two-phase flow visual erosion simulation device |
| CN114112304A (en) * | 2021-11-30 | 2022-03-01 | 西南石油大学 | Experimental device and method for simulating perforation flow erosion of hydraulic fracturing casing |
Citations (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101688443A (en) * | 2007-07-03 | 2010-03-31 | 普拉德研究及开发股份有限公司 | Perforation strategy for heterogeneous proppant placement in hydralic fracturing |
| CN105201479A (en) * | 2015-10-09 | 2015-12-30 | 西南石油大学 | Optimum design method for staged fracturing perforation cluster parameters of horizontal well of shale reservoir |
| US20160139588A1 (en) * | 2014-11-18 | 2016-05-19 | Weatherford Technology Holdings, Llc | Systems and methods for optimizing formation fracturing operations |
| US20160177693A1 (en) * | 2014-12-17 | 2016-06-23 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Compositions and methods of improving hydraulic fracture network |
| CN106894793A (en) * | 2017-03-03 | 2017-06-27 | 西南石油大学 | The many cluster perforating and fracturing optimization method and devices of horizontal well in segments |
| CN106951659A (en) * | 2017-04-05 | 2017-07-14 | 中国石油大学(北京) | A kind of perforating scheme for efficiently realizing sandstone combined pressure at the top of coal seam and coal seam |
| CN109424348A (en) * | 2017-09-05 | 2019-03-05 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | The judgment method and system of the more cluster perforating and fracturing Number of Fractures of horizontal well |
| CN109958416A (en) * | 2017-12-22 | 2019-07-02 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | A kind of more cluster perforation press cracking methods of the close uniform feed liquor of variable orifice diameter variable orifice into sand |
| CN110374569A (en) * | 2019-07-22 | 2019-10-25 | 中国石油大学(北京) | A kind of uniform remodeling method of compact reservoir and system |
| CN110439519A (en) * | 2019-07-22 | 2019-11-12 | 中国石油大学(北京) | A kind of fracturing process and system based on the design of limit current limliting |
-
2020
- 2020-05-06 CN CN202010373494.3A patent/CN111472730B/en active Active
Patent Citations (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101688443A (en) * | 2007-07-03 | 2010-03-31 | 普拉德研究及开发股份有限公司 | Perforation strategy for heterogeneous proppant placement in hydralic fracturing |
| US20160139588A1 (en) * | 2014-11-18 | 2016-05-19 | Weatherford Technology Holdings, Llc | Systems and methods for optimizing formation fracturing operations |
| US20160177693A1 (en) * | 2014-12-17 | 2016-06-23 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Compositions and methods of improving hydraulic fracture network |
| CN105201479A (en) * | 2015-10-09 | 2015-12-30 | 西南石油大学 | Optimum design method for staged fracturing perforation cluster parameters of horizontal well of shale reservoir |
| CN106894793A (en) * | 2017-03-03 | 2017-06-27 | 西南石油大学 | The many cluster perforating and fracturing optimization method and devices of horizontal well in segments |
| CN106951659A (en) * | 2017-04-05 | 2017-07-14 | 中国石油大学(北京) | A kind of perforating scheme for efficiently realizing sandstone combined pressure at the top of coal seam and coal seam |
| CN109424348A (en) * | 2017-09-05 | 2019-03-05 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | The judgment method and system of the more cluster perforating and fracturing Number of Fractures of horizontal well |
| CN109958416A (en) * | 2017-12-22 | 2019-07-02 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | A kind of more cluster perforation press cracking methods of the close uniform feed liquor of variable orifice diameter variable orifice into sand |
| CN110374569A (en) * | 2019-07-22 | 2019-10-25 | 中国石油大学(北京) | A kind of uniform remodeling method of compact reservoir and system |
| CN110439519A (en) * | 2019-07-22 | 2019-11-12 | 中国石油大学(北京) | A kind of fracturing process and system based on the design of limit current limliting |
Non-Patent Citations (12)
| Title |
|---|
| GONGBO LONG等: "A Perforation-Erosion Model for Hydraulic-Fracturing Applications", 《SPE PRODUCTION & OPERATIONS》 * |
| SHANG, DL等: "Local asymmetric fracturing to construct complex fracture network in tight porous reservoirs during subsurface coal mining: An experimental study", 《JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING》 * |
| TANG, C 等: "Numerical Simulation Study on Seepage Theory of a Multi-Section Fractured Horizontal Well in Shale Gas Reservoirs Based on Multi-Scale Flow Mechanisms", 《ENERGIES》 * |
| 李勇明等: "射孔孔眼磨蚀对分段压裂裂缝扩展的影响", 《天然气工业》 * |
| 李扬等: "水平井分段多簇限流压裂数值模拟", 《断块油气田》 * |
| 李海涛等: "水平井多段分簇射孔优化设计", 《特种油气藏》 * |
| 李海涛等: "致密油水平井分簇射孔设计新方法与应用", 《测井技术》 * |
| 李玮等: "页岩气藏水平井多级压裂裂缝扩展模型研究", 《中国科学:物理学 力学 天文学》 * |
| 杨兆中等: "致密储层水平井段内多簇压裂多裂缝扩展研究", 《岩石力学与工程学报》 * |
| 许江文等: "水平井薄互层大段多缝纵向扩展影响因素分析", 《科学技术与工程》 * |
| 赵金洲等: "水平井分段多簇压裂模拟分析及射孔优化", 《石油勘探与开发》 * |
| 邢庆河等: "水平井限流法压裂射孔方案设计方法研究", 《西安石油大学学报(自然科学版)》 * |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112630404A (en) * | 2020-10-29 | 2021-04-09 | 中国石油大学(北京) | Method for calculating perforation flow under condition of large-section multi-cluster and method for evaluating fracturing effect |
| CN112630404B (en) * | 2020-10-29 | 2022-02-08 | 中国石油大学(北京) | Method for calculating perforation flow under condition of large-section multi-cluster and method for evaluating fracturing effect |
| CN112945703A (en) * | 2021-02-04 | 2021-06-11 | 西南石油大学 | Liquid-solid two-phase flow visual erosion simulation device |
| CN112945703B (en) * | 2021-02-04 | 2022-03-11 | 西南石油大学 | Liquid-solid two-phase flow visual erosion simulation device |
| CN114112304A (en) * | 2021-11-30 | 2022-03-01 | 西南石油大学 | Experimental device and method for simulating perforation flow erosion of hydraulic fracturing casing |
| CN114112304B (en) * | 2021-11-30 | 2024-03-12 | 西南石油大学 | Experimental device and method for simulating perforation flow erosion of hydraulic fracturing sleeve |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN111472730B (en) | 2022-07-05 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN109977612B (en) | Fracturing process suitable for encrypted development of shale gas well | |
| CN111472730B (en) | Large-section multi-cluster fracturing perforation scheme determination method | |
| Qun et al. | Progress and development directions of shale oil reservoir stimulation technology of China National Petroleum Corporation | |
| CN110608024B (en) | Volume fracturing method for improving filling efficiency of micro-support system by deep shale gas | |
| Guang et al. | Technical strategies for effective development and gas recovery enhancement of a large tight gas field: A case study of Sulige gas field, Ordos Basin, NW China | |
| Wu et al. | Advances and challenges in hydraulic fracturing of tight reservoirs: A critical review | |
| Qun et al. | The “fracture-controlled reserves” based stimulation technology for unconventional oil and gas reservoirs | |
| CN109751037B (en) | High-frequency variable-displacement volume fracturing method for normal-pressure shale gas reservoir | |
| CN109931045B (en) | Self-supporting acid fracturing method of double-seam system | |
| CN111140226B (en) | Method for improving crack flow conductivity | |
| CN111305807B (en) | Fracturing method for improving fracture height during shale gas multi-cluster perforation | |
| CN112417644B (en) | Horizontal well multi-section multi-cluster limit flow fracturing process design method | |
| Li et al. | Effect of perforation friction on 3D In-stage multiple fracture propagation: A numerical study | |
| Lolon et al. | Evaluating horizontal well placement and hydraulic fracture spacing/conductivity in the Bakken Formation, North Dakota | |
| CN112541287B (en) | Loose sandstone fracturing filling sand-prevention yield-increase profile control design method | |
| Yi et al. | Determination of dynamic reserves of fractured horizontal wells in tight oil reservoirs by multi-region material balance method | |
| CN115618759A (en) | Shale gas formation fracturing construction parameter optimization method | |
| CN113513295B (en) | Method for improving uniform extension and support of multi-cluster cracks in section | |
| CN113073966B (en) | Shale gas horizontal well casing middle-casing-fixing repeated fracturing method | |
| CN113027441B (en) | Optimal design method for sand fracturing of hydraulic fracture full support | |
| CN113743037A (en) | Low-permeability reservoir water injection induced dynamic fracture variable flow conductivity calculation method | |
| CN112963132A (en) | Integral fracturing optimization design method for large well group of compact oil horizontal well | |
| Guo et al. | Sand production by hydraulic erosion during multicycle steam stimulation: An analytical study | |
| Li et al. | A Novel model for simulating the integration process of hydraulic fracturing, shut-in period, and well production | |
| Covell et al. | Hydraulic well stimulation in low-temperature geothermal areas for direct use |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |