CN111460702A - Structural part damage identification method based on forward and reverse damage feature fusion - Google Patents

Structural part damage identification method based on forward and reverse damage feature fusion Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN111460702A
CN111460702A CN202010159711.9A CN202010159711A CN111460702A CN 111460702 A CN111460702 A CN 111460702A CN 202010159711 A CN202010159711 A CN 202010159711A CN 111460702 A CN111460702 A CN 111460702A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
damage
residual stress
progressive
vulnerable
factor
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN202010159711.9A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN111460702B (en
Inventor
朱林
邱建春
郭广明
王鹏
黄嘉铭
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Yangzhou University
Original Assignee
Yangzhou University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Yangzhou University filed Critical Yangzhou University
Priority to CN202010159711.9A priority Critical patent/CN111460702B/en
Publication of CN111460702A publication Critical patent/CN111460702A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN111460702B publication Critical patent/CN111460702B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01LMEASURING FORCE, STRESS, TORQUE, WORK, MECHANICAL POWER, MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY, OR FLUID PRESSURE
    • G01L5/00Apparatus for, or methods of, measuring force, work, mechanical power, or torque, specially adapted for specific purposes
    • G01L5/0047Apparatus for, or methods of, measuring force, work, mechanical power, or torque, specially adapted for specific purposes measuring forces due to residual stresses
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P10/00Technologies related to metal processing
    • Y02P10/20Recycling

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a structural part damage identification method based on forward and reverse damage characteristic fusion, which comprises the following steps: s1, measuring residual stress of the position where the structural part is easy to damage in real time; s2, calculating the progressive factor distortion rate based on the real-time residual stress value; s3, roughly selecting the damage position based on the progressive factor distortion rate; s4, judging whether the structural part is damaged or not based on the crack initiation-propagation critical criterion; s5, judging the damage degree of the structural part based on the split tip energy release process; and S6, judging damage identification of the reverse progressive factor based on the positive damage degree. The method is high in detection precision and has important practical significance for realizing structural part damage identification.

Description

Structural part damage identification method based on forward and reverse damage feature fusion
Technical Field
The invention relates to a structural part damage identification method, in particular to a structural part damage identification method based on forward and reverse damage characteristic fusion.
Background
With the development and progress of society, large structural members have been increasingly appearing in the visual field of people and have become an important tool in the development of human society. However, with the development of large-scale structural members and the further deterioration of ultimate working environments, the small damage may cause great harm to the economic society, and the safety problem of large-scale structural members has become a key focus of the whole society. At present, most damage identification methods are developed based on detection parameters alone, and considering the regularity of the mechanism, the damage rule of the structural part cannot be comprehensively reflected by the detection parameters alone. Therefore, how to realize the accurate identification of the structural part damage through the establishment of the linkage mechanism between the mechanism model and the detection parameters on the basis of fully considering the mechanism model is a common problem in the research field.
Disclosure of Invention
The purpose of the invention is as follows: the invention aims to provide a structural part damage identification method based on forward and reverse damage characteristic fusion.
5. The technical scheme is as follows: the invention provides a structural part damage identification method based on forward and reverse damage characteristic fusion, which comprises the following steps:
s1, measuring residual stress of the position where the structural part is easy to damage in real time;
s2, calculating the progressive factor distortion rate based on the real-time residual stress value;
s3, roughly selecting the damage position based on the progressive factor distortion rate;
s4, judging whether the structural part is damaged or not based on the crack initiation-propagation critical criterion;
s5, judging the damage degree of the structural part based on the split tip energy release process;
and S6, judging damage identification of the reverse progressive factor based on the positive damage degree.
Further, the measuring method in step S1 is as follows: introducing a finite element model of a structural part to be analyzed into finite element analysis software, and then meshing the structural part according to an automatic modeThe method comprises the following steps of dividing, applying a certain working condition load and boundary constraint conditions according to an actual working condition, starting a post-processing module to solve a finite element model under a dynamic stress module to obtain dynamic stress distribution and a maximum stress value, selecting 6 positions which are most prone to damage according to an analysis result as positions for next analysis, measuring residual stress of the 6 vulnerable positions under the actual working condition in real time on the basis of the 6 vulnerable positions after analysis, and fixing the residual stress value sigma of a time nodeiqRecording, wherein i is the number of the damage position, and i is 1, 2, 3.. 6; q represents a time node, q ═ 1, 2, 3m,tmIs the total monitoring time.
Further, the calculation method in step S2 is as follows: on the basis of the residual stress values of the real-time 6 vulnerable positions obtained by the S1 test, a progressive factor D of the residual stress values is firstly carried outiqThe calculation is carried out in such a way that,
Figure BDA0002404821270000021
wherein D isiqA residual stress progression factor at the qth time node corresponding to the i-th vulnerable location; sigmaiqIs the real-time residual stress value of the q time node of the i-th vulnerable position, q represents the time node, i is the number of the damaged position, tmIs the total monitoring time; c (sigma)iq)maxThe maximum value of all residual stress values of the q time nodes of all i-th vulnerable positions is obtained, and then the residual stress values are obtained according to a progressive factor DiqProgressive factor distortion rate J for real-time residual stress valuesiPerforming calculation with the time span of 0-tmIs measured during the total monitoring period of (a),
Figure BDA0002404821270000022
wherein, JiThe real-time residual stress progressive factor distortion rate of the ith vulnerable position; c (D)iq)maxMaximum of all residual stress progression factors for the ith vulnerable siteA value; c (D)iq)minThe minimum value of all residual stress progressive factors of the ith vulnerable position;
Figure BDA0002404821270000026
is the average of all residual stress progression factors for the ith vulnerable site.
Further, the roughing method in step S3 is: at 0-tmCalculating the distortion rate of the progressive factor of the ith vulnerable position based on the measured residual stress value, and selecting the distortion rate value to be [ α ]]The vulnerable site within the range serves as the rougher selected most likely site for the damaged structural member,
Figure BDA0002404821270000023
Figure BDA0002404821270000024
wherein α is the lower limit value of the progressive factor distortion range of the rough selection of the damage position, β is the upper limit value of the progressive factor distortion range of the rough selection of the damage position;
Figure BDA0002404821270000027
averaging the distortion rates of the residual stress progressive factors of all vulnerable positions; c (J)i)maxThe maximum value of the distortion factor of the residual stress progressive factor of all vulnerable positions is obtained; c (J)i)minThe minimum value of the residual stress progression factor distortion for all vulnerable sites, wherein,
Figure BDA0002404821270000025
further, the determination method in step S4 is: on the basis of the damage position determined in S3, stress-strain data of the damage position under the real-time working condition are collected in an experiment, and the collected stress-strain data are imported into finite element simulation software to carry out acoustic emission impact energy on the damage positionNiCalculating to obtain the number of the damage position, i, measuring the acoustic emission impact energy of the damage position under the actual working condition by using acoustic emission testing equipment, and measuring the measured value MiRecord if 1.05Ni≤Mi≤1.37NiThen the transient process from crack initiation to crack propagation occurs at the position i; if M isi<1.05NiIf no, no substantial damage process has occurred at position i; if M isi>1.37NiIf the environment condition is worse, the detection result is influenced, the measurement needs to be carried out again, and after the calculation is finished, the M is passediAnd NiThe decision of whether damage has occurred can be implemented by the composed criterion.
Further, the step S5 includes applying a load to the determined possible damage position based on the determination of whether the structural member has been damaged in S4, and performing acoustic emission crack tip impact L on the damage position immediately after the load is appliediCollecting and calculating, then continuously loading, and carrying out the impact H of the acoustic emission slow release process on the damaged position after the completioniPerforming acquisition calculation, and taking the damage degree coefficient as Si
Figure BDA0002404821270000031
Wherein, LiAcoustic emission crack tip impact at the damage location; siIs a damage degree coefficient; hiThe impact quantity of the acoustic emission slow-release process of the damage position is obtained; miAcoustic emission impact energy of a damage position under actual working conditions; n is a radical ofiAcoustic emission impact energy for the damage location; i is the number of the lesion site.
Further, the identification method in step S6 is: distortion rate J according to the residual stress progression factor calculated in S2iAnd the damage degree coefficient S determined in S5iDamage ratio W for each damage siteiThe calculation is carried out in such a way that,
Figure BDA0002404821270000032
wherein, WiThe damage rate for each damage location; j. the design is a squareiThe factor distortion rate is progressive for residual stress; c (J)i)maxThe maximum value of the distortion factor of the residual stress progressive factor of all vulnerable positions is obtained;
Figure BDA0002404821270000034
averaging the distortion rates of the residual stress progressive factors of all vulnerable positions; siIs a damage degree coefficient;
Figure BDA0002404821270000035
the average value of the damage degree coefficient; c (S)i)maxIs the maximum value of the damage degree coefficient,
Figure BDA0002404821270000033
wherein, the number of the determined damage positions after the determination of the step S4 is determined.
Has the advantages that: the method can realize rough selection of the damage position through the distortion rate of the residual stress progressive factor, then form a combined damage classification strategy according to the critical criterion of crack initiation-expansion and the staged criterion of the crack tip energy release process, and combine the strategy mechanism with the detected residual stress progressive factor to determine the damage position, thereby being beneficial to accurately identifying the specific damage condition of the large structural member and further better improving the use safety of the large structural member.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of the present invention.
Detailed Description
As shown in fig. 1, the structural component damage identification method based on forward and backward damage feature fusion of the present embodiment includes the following steps:
s1, measuring residual stress of a position where a structural part is easy to damage in real time:
the method comprises the steps of introducing a finite element model of a structural part to be analyzed into finite element analysis software ANSYS, dividing the structural part into grids according to an automatic mode, applying a certain working condition load and boundary constraint conditions according to actual working conditions, starting a post-processing module to solve the finite element model under a dynamic stress module to obtain dynamic stress distribution and a maximum stress value, and selecting 6 positions which are most prone to damage according to an analysis result as key positions of next key analysis.
On the basis of the analyzed 6 vulnerable positions, measuring the residual stress of the 6 vulnerable positions under the actual working condition in real time, and determining the residual stress value sigma of the fixed time nodeiqAnd recording is carried out. (i is the number of the lesion site, i is 1, 2, 3.. 6; q represents a time node, q is 1, 2, 3.. tm,tmFor total monitoring time)
S2, calculating the progressive factor distortion rate based on the real-time residual stress value:
on the basis of the residual stress values of the real-time 6 vulnerable positions obtained by the S1 test, a progressive factor D of the residual stress values is firstly carried outiqAnd (6) performing calculation.
Figure BDA0002404821270000041
Wherein D isiqA residual stress progression factor at the qth time node corresponding to the i-th vulnerable location; sigmaiqIs the real-time residual stress value of the q time node of the i-th vulnerable position, q represents the time node, i is the number of the damaged position, tmIs the total monitoring time; c (sigma)iq)maxThe maximum value of all residual stress values of the q time nodes of all the i-th vulnerable positions.
Then according to a progressive factor DiqProgressive factor distortion rate J for real-time residual stress valuesiPerforming calculation with the time span of 0-tmThe total monitoring time period of (a).
Figure BDA0002404821270000051
Wherein, JiThe real-time residual stress progressive factor distortion rate of the ith vulnerable position; c (D)iq)maxThe maximum value of all residual stress progressive factors of the ith vulnerable position; c (D)iq)maxThe minimum value of all residual stress progressive factors of the ith vulnerable position;
Figure BDA0002404821270000055
is the average of all residual stress progression factors for the ith vulnerable site.
S3, roughly selecting damage positions based on the progressive factor distortion rate:
at 0-tmCalculating the distortion rate of the progressive factor of the ith vulnerable position based on the measured residual stress value, and selecting the distortion rate value to be [ α ]]The vulnerable site within the range serves as the site of the rougher selected structural member that is most likely to be damaged.
Figure BDA0002404821270000052
Figure BDA0002404821270000053
Wherein α is the lower limit value of the progressive factor distortion range of the rough selection of the damage position, β is the upper limit value of the progressive factor distortion range of the rough selection of the damage position;
Figure BDA0002404821270000056
averaging the distortion rates of the residual stress progressive factors of all vulnerable positions; c (J)i)maxThe maximum value of the distortion factor of the residual stress progressive factor of all vulnerable positions is obtained; c (J)i)minThe minimum value of the residual stress progression factor distortion rate is the minimum value of all vulnerable positions.
Figure BDA0002404821270000054
S4, judging whether the structural part is damaged or not based on the crack initiation-expansion critical criterion:
on the basis of the damage positions determined in the S3, stress and strain data of a plurality of damage positions under the real-time working condition are collected in an experiment, and the collected stress and strain data are led into finite element simulation software to conduct acoustic emission impact energy N of the damage positionsiCalculating to obtain the number of the damage position, measuring the acoustic emission impact energy of the damage positions under the actual working condition by using an acoustic emission testing device, and measuring a measured value MiRecord (i is the number of the damage location).
If 1.05Ni≤Mi≤1.37NiThen the transient process from crack initiation to crack propagation occurs at the position i; if M isi<1.05NiIf no, no substantial damage process has occurred at position i; if M isi>1.37NiAnd if the environment condition is worse, the detection result is influenced, and the measurement needs to be carried out again. After the calculation is finished, passing through MiAnd NiThe basic decision of whether damage has occurred can be realized by the composed criterion.
S5, judging the damage degree of the structural part based on the split tip energy release process:
on the basis of judging whether the structural part finished in the S4 has damage or not, 100KN is applied to the judged possible damage position, a load with the loading frequency of 2HZ is loaded, the load loading time is 2 minutes, and the acoustic emission tip cracking impact quantity L is carried out on the damage position immediately after the loading is finishediCollecting and calculating, continuously loading for 2 minutes, and carrying out acoustic emission slow release process on the damaged position after the gap is 1 minuteiAnd carrying out acquisition calculation.
Taking the damage degree coefficient as Si
Figure BDA0002404821270000061
Wherein, LiAcoustic emission crack tip impact at the damage location; siIs a damage degree coefficient; hiThe impact quantity of the acoustic emission slow-release process of the damage position is obtained; miAcoustic emission impact energy of a damage position under actual working conditions; n is a radical ofiAcoustic emission impact energy for the damage location; i is the number of the lesion site.
S6, judging damage identification based on the forward damage degree and the reverse progressive factor distortion rate:
distortion rate J according to the residual stress progression factor calculated in S2iAnd the damage degree coefficient S determined in S5iDamage ratio W for each damage siteiAnd (6) performing calculation.
Figure BDA0002404821270000062
Wherein, WiThe damage rate for each damage location; j. the design is a squareiThe factor distortion rate is progressive for residual stress; c (J)i)maxThe maximum value of the distortion factor of the residual stress progressive factor of all vulnerable positions is obtained;
Figure BDA0002404821270000064
averaging the distortion rates of the residual stress progressive factors of all vulnerable positions; siIs a damage degree coefficient;
Figure BDA0002404821270000065
the average value of the damage degree coefficient; c (S)i)maxThe maximum value of the damage degree coefficient.
Figure BDA0002404821270000063
Wherein, the number of the determined damage positions after the determination of the step S4 is determined.

Claims (7)

1. A structural part damage identification method based on forward and reverse damage feature fusion is characterized by comprising the following steps: the method comprises the following steps:
s1, measuring residual stress of the position where the structural part is easy to damage in real time;
s2, calculating the progressive factor distortion rate based on the real-time residual stress value;
s3, roughly selecting the damage position based on the progressive factor distortion rate;
s4, judging whether the structural part is damaged or not based on the crack initiation-propagation critical criterion;
s5, judging the damage degree of the structural part based on the split tip energy release process;
and S6, judging damage identification of the reverse progressive factor based on the positive damage degree.
2. The structural member damage identification method based on forward and reverse damage feature fusion according to claim 1, characterized in that: the measuring method in the step S1 is as follows: introducing a finite element model of a structural part to be analyzed into finite element analysis software, then dividing the structural part into grids according to an automatic mode, applying a certain working condition load and boundary constraint conditions according to actual working conditions, starting a post-processing module to solve the finite element model under a dynamic stress module to obtain dynamic stress distribution and maximum stress values, selecting 6 positions which are most easily damaged as positions for next analysis according to analysis results, measuring the residual stress of the 6 easily damaged positions under the actual working conditions in real time on the basis of the 6 easily damaged positions after analysis, and measuring the residual stress value sigma of a fixed time nodeiqRecording, wherein i is the number of the damage position, and i is 1, 2, 3.. 6; q represents a time node, q ═ 1, 2, 3m,tmIs the total monitoring time.
3. The structural member damage identification method based on forward and reverse damage feature fusion as claimed in claim 2, wherein: the calculation method of the step S2 is as follows: on the basis of the residual stress values of the real-time 6 vulnerable positions obtained by the S1 test, a progressive factor D of the residual stress values is firstly carried outiqThe calculation is carried out in such a way that,
Figure FDA0002404821260000011
wherein D isiqCorresponding to the i-th vulnerable position at the q-th timeA residual stress progression factor at the junction; sigmaiqIs the real-time residual stress value of the q time node of the i-th vulnerable position, q represents the time node, i is the number of the damaged position, tmIs the total monitoring time; c (sigma)iq)maxThe maximum value of all residual stress values of the q time nodes of all i-th vulnerable positions is obtained, and then the residual stress values are obtained according to a progressive factor DiqProgressive factor distortion rate J for real-time residual stress valuesiPerforming calculation with the time span of 0-tmIs measured during the total monitoring period of (a),
Figure FDA0002404821260000012
wherein, JiThe real-time residual stress progressive factor distortion rate of the ith vulnerable position; c (D)iq)maxThe maximum value of all residual stress progressive factors of the ith vulnerable position; c (D)iq)minThe minimum value of all residual stress progressive factors of the ith vulnerable position;
Figure FDA0002404821260000021
is the average of all residual stress progression factors for the ith vulnerable site.
4. The structural member damage identification method based on forward and reverse damage feature fusion as claimed in claim 3, wherein: the step S3 rough selection method includes: at 0-tmCalculating the distortion rate of the progressive factor of the ith vulnerable position based on the measured residual stress value, and selecting the distortion rate value to be [ α ]]The vulnerable site within the range serves as the rougher selected most likely site for the damaged structural member,
Figure FDA0002404821260000022
Figure FDA0002404821260000023
wherein α is the lower limit value of the progressive factor distortion range of the rough selection of the damage position, β is the upper limit value of the progressive factor distortion range of the rough selection of the damage position;
Figure FDA0002404821260000024
averaging the distortion rates of the residual stress progressive factors of all vulnerable positions; c (J)i)maxThe maximum value of the distortion factor of the residual stress progressive factor of all vulnerable positions is obtained; c (J)i)minThe minimum value of the residual stress progression factor distortion for all vulnerable sites, wherein,
Figure FDA0002404821260000025
5. the structural member damage identification method based on forward and reverse damage feature fusion as claimed in claim 4, wherein: the determination method in step S4 is: on the basis of the damage position determined in S3, stress-strain data of the damage position under the real-time working condition are collected in an experiment, and the collected stress-strain data are imported into finite element simulation software to carry out acoustic emission impact energy N on the damage positioniCalculating to obtain the number of the damage position, i, measuring the acoustic emission impact energy of the damage position under the actual working condition by using acoustic emission testing equipment, and measuring the measured value MiRecord if 1.05Ni≤Mi≤1.37NiThen the transient process from crack initiation to crack propagation occurs at the position i; if M isi<1.05NiIf no, no substantial damage process has occurred at position i; if M isi>1.37NiIf the environment condition is worse, the detection result is influenced, the measurement needs to be carried out again, and after the calculation is finished, the M is passediAnd NiThe decision of whether damage has occurred can be implemented by the composed criterion.
6. The method of claim 5The structural component damage identification method based on forward and reverse damage characteristic fusion is characterized in that the step S5 is that on the basis of the judgment of whether the structural component is damaged or not in S4, load is applied to the judged possible damage position, and after the load is applied, acoustic emission crack tip impact quantity L is carried out on the damage position immediatelyiCollecting and calculating, then continuously loading, and carrying out the impact H of the acoustic emission slow release process on the damaged position after the completioniPerforming acquisition calculation, and taking the damage degree coefficient as Si
Figure FDA0002404821260000031
Wherein, LiAcoustic emission crack tip impact at the damage location; siIs a damage degree coefficient; hiThe impact quantity of the acoustic emission slow-release process of the damage position is obtained; miAcoustic emission impact energy of a damage position under actual working conditions; n is a radical ofiAcoustic emission impact energy for the damage location; i is the number of the lesion site.
7. The structural member damage identification method based on forward and reverse damage feature fusion as claimed in claim 6, wherein: the identification method in step S6 is: distortion rate J according to the residual stress progression factor calculated in S2iAnd the damage degree coefficient S determined in S5iDamage ratio W for each damage siteiThe calculation is carried out in such a way that,
Figure FDA0002404821260000032
wherein, WiThe damage rate for each damage location; j. the design is a squareiThe factor distortion rate is progressive for residual stress; c (J)i)maxThe maximum value of the distortion factor of the residual stress progressive factor of all vulnerable positions is obtained;
Figure FDA0002404821260000033
residual stress for all vulnerable sitesAn average of the progressive factor distortion rate; siIs a damage degree coefficient;
Figure FDA0002404821260000034
the average value of the damage degree coefficient; c (S)i)maxIs the maximum value of the damage degree coefficient,
Figure FDA0002404821260000035
wherein, the number of the determined damage positions after the determination of the step S4 is determined.
CN202010159711.9A 2020-03-09 2020-03-09 Structural member damage identification method based on forward and reverse damage feature fusion Active CN111460702B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010159711.9A CN111460702B (en) 2020-03-09 2020-03-09 Structural member damage identification method based on forward and reverse damage feature fusion

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010159711.9A CN111460702B (en) 2020-03-09 2020-03-09 Structural member damage identification method based on forward and reverse damage feature fusion

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN111460702A true CN111460702A (en) 2020-07-28
CN111460702B CN111460702B (en) 2023-06-20

Family

ID=71685584

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202010159711.9A Active CN111460702B (en) 2020-03-09 2020-03-09 Structural member damage identification method based on forward and reverse damage feature fusion

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN111460702B (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112560506A (en) * 2020-12-17 2021-03-26 中国平安人寿保险股份有限公司 Text semantic parsing method and device, terminal equipment and storage medium
CN115043118A (en) * 2021-09-09 2022-09-13 海沃机械(中国)有限公司 Damage identification method and device for pull arm part of garbage transfer vehicle
CN115048731A (en) * 2021-09-09 2022-09-13 海沃机械(中国)有限公司 Health assessment method and device for pull arm of garbage transfer vehicle

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104850691A (en) * 2015-05-05 2015-08-19 南京市特种设备安全监督检验研究院 Structural member crack propagation prediction method based on multi-factor fusion correction
CN105705925A (en) * 2013-11-14 2016-06-22 株式会社神户制钢所 Residual stress measuring method
CN106354934A (en) * 2016-08-30 2017-01-25 中航沈飞民用飞机有限责任公司 Stiffened wallboard damage tolerance analysis method based on finite element analysis solving
CN106844901A (en) * 2017-01-03 2017-06-13 南京市特种设备安全监督检验研究院 A kind of structural member Residual Strength Assessment method based on multifactor fusion amendment
CN107430637A (en) * 2015-03-05 2017-12-01 株式会社神户制钢所 Residual stress estimates method and residual stress estimating device
JP2018072126A (en) * 2016-10-28 2018-05-10 株式会社Ihi検査計測 Monitoring system of bearing and method for monitoring
CN108225632A (en) * 2017-12-11 2018-06-29 北京理工大学 A kind of residual stress non-linear ultrasonic detection method
CN109270170A (en) * 2018-11-21 2019-01-25 扬州大学 A kind of sensitivity amendment loading machine Structural Damage Identification considering Jie's scale
CN109657365A (en) * 2018-12-24 2019-04-19 博康智能信息技术有限公司 A kind of unmanned vehicle structural damage tracking and tired predictor method

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105705925A (en) * 2013-11-14 2016-06-22 株式会社神户制钢所 Residual stress measuring method
CN107430637A (en) * 2015-03-05 2017-12-01 株式会社神户制钢所 Residual stress estimates method and residual stress estimating device
CN104850691A (en) * 2015-05-05 2015-08-19 南京市特种设备安全监督检验研究院 Structural member crack propagation prediction method based on multi-factor fusion correction
CN106354934A (en) * 2016-08-30 2017-01-25 中航沈飞民用飞机有限责任公司 Stiffened wallboard damage tolerance analysis method based on finite element analysis solving
JP2018072126A (en) * 2016-10-28 2018-05-10 株式会社Ihi検査計測 Monitoring system of bearing and method for monitoring
CN106844901A (en) * 2017-01-03 2017-06-13 南京市特种设备安全监督检验研究院 A kind of structural member Residual Strength Assessment method based on multifactor fusion amendment
CN108225632A (en) * 2017-12-11 2018-06-29 北京理工大学 A kind of residual stress non-linear ultrasonic detection method
CN109270170A (en) * 2018-11-21 2019-01-25 扬州大学 A kind of sensitivity amendment loading machine Structural Damage Identification considering Jie's scale
CN109657365A (en) * 2018-12-24 2019-04-19 博康智能信息技术有限公司 A kind of unmanned vehicle structural damage tracking and tired predictor method

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
常琦;杨维希;赵恒;孟瑶;刘君;高鹤明;: "基于多传感器的裂纹扩展监测研究", 航空学报 *
徐春广;王俊峰;宋剑峰;田海兵;蔺廉普;饶心;: "油气管道焊接残余应力超声无损检测与原位调控技术", 石油科学通报 *

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112560506A (en) * 2020-12-17 2021-03-26 中国平安人寿保险股份有限公司 Text semantic parsing method and device, terminal equipment and storage medium
CN112560506B (en) * 2020-12-17 2023-07-25 中国平安人寿保险股份有限公司 Text semantic analysis method, device, terminal equipment and storage medium
CN115043118A (en) * 2021-09-09 2022-09-13 海沃机械(中国)有限公司 Damage identification method and device for pull arm part of garbage transfer vehicle
CN115048731A (en) * 2021-09-09 2022-09-13 海沃机械(中国)有限公司 Health assessment method and device for pull arm of garbage transfer vehicle
CN115043118B (en) * 2021-09-09 2023-10-13 海沃机械(中国)有限公司 Damage identification method and device for pull arm part of garbage transfer truck
CN115048731B (en) * 2021-09-09 2023-10-31 海沃机械(中国)有限公司 Health assessment method and device for pull arm of garbage transfer truck

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN111460702B (en) 2023-06-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN111460702A (en) Structural part damage identification method based on forward and reverse damage feature fusion
CN111829738B (en) Impact load-based bridge bearing capacity lightweight evaluation method
US7840376B2 (en) Risk-based design and maintenance systems and methods
CN102426137B (en) Testing and measuring method capable of axially loading low cycle fatigue crack initiation
CN109325263A (en) Truss bridge damage position neural network based and damage extent identification method
CN108241574A (en) A kind of method and system analyzed based on test and management tool QC software test defect
CN111597740B (en) Harvester health monitoring method based on mesoscale ultrasonic abnormal narrow band
CN110889440A (en) Rockburst grade prediction method and system based on principal component analysis and BP neural network
CN116539463B (en) Concrete strength detection method
CN106596255A (en) Hole-edge crack diagnosis method based on optical fiber spectrum image analysis
CN111767664B (en) Method for determining plane strain fracture toughness of metal material based on energy release rate
CN110728089A (en) Large-span bridge stay cable structure damage diagnosis method based on BOTDA technology
CN113607580A (en) Metal component fatigue test method and residual life prediction method
CN117807659A (en) Building structure defect detection and correction method and system
CN113720706B (en) Thermal stress equivalent method for thermal fatigue test of three-pin connecting piece with mixed structure
CN113051788B (en) Arm support fatigue analysis method
CN111678991B (en) Method for nondestructive testing damage identification of concrete structure
CN110147643B (en) Method and device for determining residual life of coupler body
CN103399974B (en) Quantize the method comparing random vibration emulated data and experimental data
CN109490334B (en) Nondestructive testing method for T-shaped forge piece by using residual stress prediction model
CN110501127A (en) A kind of uniform beam damnification recognition method based on faulted condition inclination angle slope
RU2515130C1 (en) Seismometric method to monitor technical condition of buildings and / or structures
Stashkiv et al. Test Data Processing Use for Structural Fatigue Life Assessment.
CN114676587A (en) Fatigue life evaluation method based on load spectrum similarity
CN105572329A (en) Concrete crack scale distance adaptive monitoring method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant