CN111431206A - Cooperative fault ride-through method for large-scale double-fed wind power plant through flexible Direct Current (DC) outgoing - Google Patents

Cooperative fault ride-through method for large-scale double-fed wind power plant through flexible Direct Current (DC) outgoing Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN111431206A
CN111431206A CN202010271195.9A CN202010271195A CN111431206A CN 111431206 A CN111431206 A CN 111431206A CN 202010271195 A CN202010271195 A CN 202010271195A CN 111431206 A CN111431206 A CN 111431206A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
current
voltage
control
stator
rotor
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN202010271195.9A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN111431206B (en
Inventor
李卫星
朱蒙
关万琳
陈晓光
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Dalian University of Technology
Harbin Institute of Technology
Original Assignee
Dalian University of Technology
Harbin Institute of Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Dalian University of Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology filed Critical Dalian University of Technology
Priority to CN202010271195.9A priority Critical patent/CN111431206B/en
Publication of CN111431206A publication Critical patent/CN111431206A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN111431206B publication Critical patent/CN111431206B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02JCIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J3/00Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
    • H02J3/36Arrangements for transfer of electric power between ac networks via a high-tension dc link
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E60/00Enabling technologies; Technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
    • Y02E60/60Arrangements for transfer of electric power between AC networks or generators via a high voltage DC link [HVCD]

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Control Of Eletrric Generators (AREA)

Abstract

A cooperative fault ride-through method for a large-scale double-fed wind power plant through flexible direct current outgoing belongs to the technical field of new energy alternating current and direct current grid-connected control. The method solves the problem that the cooperative fault ride-through of the large-scale double-fed wind power plant through flexible direct current delivery cannot be effectively realized by adopting the existing method. The method comprises the following specific processes: during a fault period, the sending end converter station inhibits direct-current voltage fluctuation and realizes self-adaptive balance of direct-current power through two-stage voltage reduction control, and the double-fed wind turbine generator set inhibits rotor overcurrent and direct-current components of stator current through transient current correction control; the two-stage step-down control consists of stepped step-down control and voltage droop control, and the modified transient current control consists of voltage type active current reduction control and feedforward transient stator current control. The method can be applied to cooperative fault ride-through of a large-scale double-fed wind power plant through flexible direct current outgoing.

Description

Cooperative fault ride-through method for large-scale double-fed wind power plant through flexible Direct Current (DC) outgoing
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of new energy alternating current-direct current grid-connected control, and particularly relates to a cooperative fault ride-through method for a large-scale double-fed wind power plant through flexible direct current delivery.
Background
In recent years, development and utilization of wind power are rapidly developed, and the problem of large-scale wind power transmission and grid connection becomes an important research topic. DFIG has become the mainstream model of the wind power market by virtue of its advantages of high power generation efficiency and low converter capacity. The flexible direct current transmission (MMC-HVDC) technology based on the modular multilevel converter has the advantages of high modularization degree, good waveform quality, small occupied area and the like, and is an effective mode for large-scale wind power integration. However, the fault-ride-through (FRT) capability of doubly-fed wind farms and dc transmission systems has a significant impact on system operational stability and equipment operational safety. Therefore, research needs to be carried out on an FRT control method of a flexible direct current transmission system connected with a double-fed wind power plant.
After a grid fault, the control objective of the system is to prevent dc overvoltages. The main realization mode is as follows: the power transmission capability of a grid side converter station (GSMMC) is improved through alternating current system transient reconstruction, or redundant energy storage of a direct current equivalent capacitor is released through direct current system transient reconstruction, or wind power is rapidly reduced. The alternating current system transient reconstruction is realized by adding a series transformer and a mechanical switch at a receiving end, and the direct current transient reconstruction is realized by adding an unloading circuit. The defects of the scheme are as follows: the response delay of the mechanical switch can reduce the rapidity of the transient reconstruction of the alternating current system, and additional equipment such as a switch, a series transformer and an unloading resistor is introduced, so that the occupied area and the investment cost are increased. The scheme for rapidly reducing the wind power can be divided into the following steps according to different principles: fast load shedding control, frequency up control and voltage down control based on communication. Among them, the communication-based load shedding control causes a response delay, and the system reliability is lowered when the communication fails. The frequency increasing control and the voltage reducing control are both realized by a wind power plant side converter station (WFMMC). The up-conversion control is limited by the tolerance of the wind turbine to the rate of change of frequency, reducing the de-rating efficiency, resulting in significant dc over-voltages. The implementation modes of the voltage reduction control are two types: firstly, short circuit is simulated and demagnetization control is applied to the wind power plant. But the resulting inrush current and rotor overcurrent are a critical issue. In addition, the step-down voltage is too low, which can cause the step-out of the wind turbine; and secondly, droop voltage reduction control is adopted, and additional load reduction control is introduced into the wind turbine generator. However, the scheme cannot realize demagnetization of the wind turbine generator, and the direct-current component injection can cause serious direct-current voltage oscillation generated by MMC-HVDC, which endangers the stable operation of a direct-current system.
Therefore, the cooperative fault ride-through of the large-scale double-fed wind power plant through flexible direct current delivery cannot be effectively realized by adopting the existing method.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to solve the problem that the cooperative fault ride-through of a large-scale double-fed wind power plant through flexible direct current delivery cannot be effectively realized by adopting the conventional method, and provides a cooperative fault ride-through method of the large-scale double-fed wind power plant through flexible direct current delivery.
The technical scheme adopted by the invention for solving the technical problems is as follows: a cooperative fault ride-through method for a large-scale double-fed wind power plant through flexible direct current outgoing comprises the following steps:
during a fault period, the sending end converter station inhibits direct-current voltage fluctuation and realizes self-adaptive balance of direct-current power through two-stage voltage reduction control, and the double-fed wind turbine generator set inhibits rotor overcurrent and direct-current components of stator current through transient current correction control;
the two-stage step-down control consists of stepped step-down control and voltage droop control, and the modified transient current control consists of voltage type active current reduction control and feedforward transient stator current control.
The invention has the beneficial effects that: the invention provides a cooperative fault ride-through method for a large-scale double-fed wind power plant through flexible Direct Current (DC) delivery, which can quickly reduce wind power after a power grid fault and ensure that DC voltage is not out of limit; the phenomena of unstable synchronization and transient overcurrent of the wind power plant are avoided, and the running safety of the direct current converter station and the wind power generator set is improved; the cooperative fault ride-through of the large-scale double-fed wind power plant through flexible direct current delivery is effectively realized.
Moreover, the size of the MMC-HVDC sub-module capacitor can be reduced to 80% of the original size, the use of a crowbar circuit in a wind turbine generator is avoided, the equipment investment is further saved, and the economic benefit is improved.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a doubly-fed wind farm access MMC-HVDC system;
wherein: WF stands for equivalent doubly-fed wind turbine generator (DFIG), SEMMC and REMMC stand for sending-end and receiving-end converter stations, respectively, ZcAnd ZlRespectively representing equivalent impedances, V, of the current-collecting network and the transmission linewRepresenting the stator terminal voltage of the wind turbine generator; pwRepresenting the output active power, V, of an equivalent fandchRepresenting the converter station dc voltage; vgRepresenting GSMMC grid-connected point AC voltage, PgAnd QgThe active and reactive power transmitted by REMMC to the grid are respectively.
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of the control method of the present invention;
wherein: RSC represents a rotor side converter of the wind turbine generator, and GSC represents a grid side converter of the wind turbine generator;
Iwrepresenting wind farm output current; i.e. isdAnd isqRespectively representing d-axis and q-axis components of stator current of the wind turbine generator; vnormalRepresenting the grid-connected voltage of the wind power plant in normal operation; vdref、VqrefD-axis and q-axis components of the control voltage reference for the sending end converter station, respectively, L PF stands for low pass filter.
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of the MMC-HVDC direct voltage response curve obtained by the TVDC and MTCC methods proposed by the present invention during a fault;
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a wind turbine generator stator terminal voltage response curve obtained by the TVDC and MTCC method according to the present invention during a fault period;
FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of an active current response curve of a wind turbine generator obtained by the TVDC and MTCC method according to the present invention during a fault period;
Figure BDA0002443209570000031
the current of a rotor d shaft is normal working;
FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of a stator terminal voltage d-axis component response curve obtained by the SVDC method according to the present invention during a fault period;
FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of a stator terminal voltage q-axis component response curve obtained by the SVDC method of the present invention during a fault;
FIG. 8 is a phasor diagram of the voltage at each time under the SVDC method;
Figure BDA0002443209570000032
is t2~t3The stator terminal voltage magnitude phasors for a time period,
Figure BDA0002443209570000033
is t3~t4The stator terminal voltage magnitude phasors for a time period,
Figure BDA0002443209570000034
stator terminal voltage phasor in normal operation;
FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram of a VDACC curve proposed by the present invention during a fault;
FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram of the FTSCC method according to the present invention during a failure;
wherein: krFor resonant control of gain, z is damping ratio, irdFor rotor d-axis current, irqFor rotor q-axis current, s is complex frequency, omegaslipAnd the slip is sigma, the magnetic leakage coefficient is sigma, PI + R represents proportional-integral resonance control, dq/abc represents Park inverse transformation, and RPC represents reactive power control.
FIG. 11 is a block diagram of the REMMC output active power P during a fault period using the method of the present invention and the exemplary voltage reduction methodgA simulation comparison graph;
FIG. 12 is a comparison graph of DC voltage simulation during a fault using the method of the present invention and a typical buck method;
FIG. 13 is a wind farm frequency f during a fault using the method of the present invention and a typical voltage reduction methodwA simulation comparison graph;
FIG. 14 is a wind farm grid-connected voltage V during a fault period using the method of the present invention and a typical voltage reduction methodwA simulation comparison graph;
FIG. 15 is a wind farm output current i during a fault using the method of the present invention and an exemplary voltage reduction methodwA simulation comparison graph;
FIG. 16 is a graph of wind farm output power P during a fault period using the method of the present invention and an exemplary voltage reduction methodwA simulation comparison graph;
FIG. 17 is a d-axis component V of grid-connected voltage of a wind farm during a fault period using the method of the present invention and a typical voltage reduction methodwdA simulation comparison graph;
FIG. 18 is a graph of a wind farm grid-connected voltage q-axis component V during a fault period using the method of the present invention and a typical voltage reduction methodwqA simulation comparison graph;
FIG. 19 shows the d-axis component ψ of the wind turbine flux linkage during a fault period using the method of the present invention and the exemplary voltage reduction methodsdA simulation comparison graph;
FIG. 20 is a diagram illustrating the q-axis component ψ of the wind turbine flux linkage during a fault period using the method of the present invention and the exemplary voltage reduction methodsqA simulation comparison graph;
FIG. 21 is a diagram of the d-axis component I of the stator current of a wind turbine during a fault period using the method of the present invention and a typical voltage reduction methodsdA simulation comparison graph;
FIG. 22 is a graph of the wind turbine generator stator current q-axis component I during a fault period using the method of the present invention and a typical voltage reduction methodsqA simulation comparison graph;
FIG. 23 is a wind turbine rotor current I during a fault period using the method of the present invention and a typical voltage reduction methodrA simulation comparison graph;
FIG. 24 is a graph of the rotor voltage V required by a wind turbine during a fault period using the method of the present invention and a typical voltage reduction methodrAnd (5) simulating a comparison graph.
Detailed Description
The first embodiment is as follows: the cooperative fault ride-through method for the large-scale double-fed wind power plant through flexible direct current outgoing comprises the following steps:
during a fault period, the sending end converter station inhibits direct-current voltage fluctuation and realizes self-adaptive balance of direct-current power through two-stage voltage reduction control, and the double-fed wind turbine generator set inhibits rotor overcurrent and direct-current components of stator current through transient current correction control;
the two-stage step-down control consists of stepped step-down control and voltage droop control, and the modified transient current control consists of voltage type active current reduction control and feedforward transient stator current control.
Fig. 1 shows a structure of a typical double-fed wind farm access flexible direct current transmission system. In normal operation, SEMMC controls the amplitude and frequency of the wind farm grid-connected voltage, while REMMC controls the dc voltage and the reactive power exchanged with the grid. When the power grid fails, REMMC provides extra reactive current to support the power grid voltage, and the direct current voltage can rise rapidly due to the unbalanced direct current power. Therefore, the SEMMC starts the voltage reduction control to reduce the wind power so as to prevent direct-current overvoltage.
For a flexible direct-current power transmission system connected with a double-fed wind power plant, safe and stable operation of an MMC converter station is ensured in an FRT process, and direct-current voltage ripples are effectively inhibited; meanwhile, Crowbar action of the DFIG rotor is prevented, and the synchronous stability of the wind power system is improved.
Therefore, the FRT control target of the DFIG wind power plant accessing the MMC-HVDC system is as follows:
t1) the direct voltage of MMC-HVDC is in a safe range;
t2) the injection current of MMC-HVDC is in a safe range, and the direct-current component of the stator current of the DFIG is effectively inhibited;
t3) DFIG rotor current is in the allowable range;
t4) power self-adaptive balancing of two ends of direct current after fault;
in order to realize the control target 1, effective voltage reduction control can be implemented on the wind power system through the SEMMC so as to rapidly reduce the wind power. In order to achieve the goal 2, effective demagnetization control needs to be applied to the DFIG, and the transient component of the output current of the wind turbine generator is reduced. To achieve goal 3, the rotor current of the wind turbine needs to be reduced during the step-down. To achieve goal 4, adaptive voltage control needs to be introduced in the buck control loop.
Fig. 2 is a proposed FRT control system architecture. The proposed solution consists of two parts: two-stage buck control (TVDC) for SEMMC and Modified Transient Current Control (MTCC) for DFIG. Wherein the two-stage buck control consists of a stepped buck control (SVDC) and a Voltage Droop Control (VDC). The SVDC aims to realize the reduction of wind power and restrain the stator free flux linkage of the DFIG; the function of the Voltage Droop Control (VDC) is to realize the rapid balance of the active power of the direct current system after the SVDC process is finished. The Modified Transient Current Control (MTCC) of the RSC of the wind turbine generator consists of a voltage type active current reduction control (VDACC) and a feedforward transient current control (FTSCC). The VDACC is used for adjusting the rotor current and preventing MMC-HVDC overvoltage caused by step loss of a wind power system; the purpose of the FTSCC is to further suppress the dc component of the stator current.
FIGS. 3, 4, and 5 show the proposed FRT control strategy applied at t1MMC-HVDC direct-current voltage V after three-phase short-circuit fault of PCC at momentdchTerminal voltage V of DFIG statorsAnd an active current irdrefTime domain response curve of (1). t is t2Time direct voltage VdchReaches its protective action threshold
Figure BDA0002443209570000051
Then, ISMMC initiates a two-stage buck control, where t2~t4Stage is SVDC, at t4The time instant switches to VDC. Meanwhile, VDACC of DFIG is at t2And the SVDC is activated after the moment, and the reduction of the active power output by the fan is realized in cooperation with the SVDC. t is t4After the moment, VDACC acts on V according to VDCsRapidly adjust its output power PwRealization of PwAnd PgAdaptive balancing of (2). At this time VdchRise to the maximum value
Figure BDA0002443209570000052
And VsAnd irdRespectively reduced to the minimum
Figure BDA0002443209570000053
And
Figure BDA0002443209570000054
the second embodiment is as follows: the first difference between the present embodiment and the specific embodiment is: the specific process of the step-type pressure reduction control is as follows:
the stepped buck control strategy is shown in fig. 6 and 7. FIG. 6 and FIG. 7 show stator terminal voltage d-axis component VsdAnd q-axis component VsqTime domain response curve of (1).
At t1At the moment, the PCC has a three-phase short-circuit fault, at t2Time of day, DC voltage VdchReaching a protection action threshold
Figure BDA0002443209570000055
And the moment when the first step reduction occurs is defined as t3The second step-down occurs at a time t4As can be seen from fig. 6 and 7, the stator terminal voltage V at each periodsAre respectively expressed as d-axis and q-axis components
Figure BDA0002443209570000056
Figure BDA0002443209570000061
In the formula, t represents time, VsdRepresenting stator terminal voltage VsThe d-axis component of (a) is,
Figure BDA0002443209570000062
representing the stator terminal voltage during normal operation,
Figure BDA0002443209570000063
is t2~t3The d-axis component of the stator terminal voltage magnitude of the time period,
Figure BDA0002443209570000064
is t2~t3The magnitude of the stator terminal voltage over a period of time,
Figure BDA0002443209570000065
is t3~t4The d-axis component of the stator terminal voltage magnitude of the time period,
Figure BDA0002443209570000066
is t3~t4Stator terminal voltage amplitude of time period, theta1Represents t2~t3Phase angle of stator terminal voltage in time interval;
Vsqrepresenting stator terminal voltage VsThe q-axis component of (a) is,
Figure BDA0002443209570000067
is t2~t3A q-axis component of stator terminal voltage amplitude of the time period;
the formulas (1) and (2) show that the stator voltage amplitude and the phase of the wind turbine generator are t2~t4The duration is continuously varied.
Thus, stator terminal voltage phasor
Figure BDA0002443209570000068
Is shown as
Figure BDA0002443209570000069
In the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
Figure BDA00024432095700000610
e is the natural logarithm, j is the unit of the imaginary number, omegasIs the synchronous angular frequency;
stator flux linkage vector psi corresponding to different voltage drop degreessExpressed as:
Figure BDA00024432095700000611
in the formula IrRepresenting rotor current, RsAnd LsStator resistance and inductance, L respectivelymFor generator excitation inductance, C1And C2Respectively represents t2And t3Time stator free flux linkage psisnAn initial value of (1);
from the formula (4), at t2~t3And t3~t4Time period, psisAre all free components psisn(first term) and the mandatory component ψsf(item two) composition;
for a MW class wind turbine, RsAre small. To simplify the analysis, assume the rotor current IrAt t2To t4The time interval is not changed, and C is obtained according to the flux linkage conservation principle1And C2Expression (c):
Figure BDA0002443209570000071
in formula (5), (t) is3-t2) Defined as the duration of SVDC.
As can be seen from the formulas (4) and (5), if at t3At a moment of time satisfies psisnIf 0, then C must be present20, therefore, must satisfy
Figure BDA0002443209570000072
For visual explanation, the phasor expression corresponding to the formula (13) obtained by the phasor method is shown as
Figure BDA0002443209570000073
FIG. 8 shows θ1And the phasor diagram corresponding to the SVDC is larger than or equal to 0. As can be seen from FIG. 8, if t is the same3At the moment of time, the time of day,
Figure BDA0002443209570000074
and
Figure BDA0002443209570000075
are of the same amplitude and in opposite directions, then C2And 0 holds.
Therefore, when
Figure BDA0002443209570000076
And theta1When the value of (b) satisfies the phasor relationship corresponding to equation (13) or fig. 8, the embodiment can simultaneously realize the reduction of the wind power and the demagnetization of the doubly-fed wind turbine generator.
The third concrete implementation mode: the second embodiment is different from the first embodiment in that: the specific process of the voltage droop control stage is as follows:
t3after a short interval of time at t4And at the moment, the SEMMC is switched to a voltage droop control mode to realize the rapid balance of the power at two ends of the direct current system. At this stage, Vsq=0,VsdAnd VdchDesigned to be linear, i.e.
Figure BDA0002443209570000077
In the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
Figure BDA0002443209570000078
representing the voltage reduction control exiting the corresponding DC voltage threshold, KFRTIs the sag factor, KFRTIs expressed as
Figure BDA0002443209570000079
In the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
Figure BDA00024432095700000710
the upper limit of the MMC-HVDC direct-current voltage is mainly determined by the overvoltage tolerance level of the sub-module capacitor,
Figure BDA00024432095700000711
represents the lower limit of the depressurization depth.
The fourth concrete implementation mode: the third difference between the present embodiment and the specific embodiment is that: the specific process of the voltage type active current reduction control is as follows:
FIG. 9 shows a VDACC curve suitable for use in a DFIG. When the d-axis voltage of the power grid is oriented, the d-axis component of the rotor current is controlledTo control the active power emitted by the DFIG, so in fig. 9, the rotor d-axis current reference irdrefRepresenting a reference value of active current of the wind turbine generator during voltage reduction;
rotor d-axis current reference value irdrefIs expressed as
Figure BDA0002443209570000081
In the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
Figure BDA0002443209570000082
the voltage threshold for switching from constant power control mode to VDACC mode,
Figure BDA0002443209570000083
representing the d-axis current of the rotor in normal operation;
to prevent conflict with the buck control, the rotor q-axis current reference irqrefIs expressed as
irqref=-Vs/Lm(9)。
The fifth concrete implementation mode: the fourth difference between this embodiment and the specific embodiment is that: the specific process of the feedforward transient stator current control is as follows:
in the design process of SVDC, the wind farm frequency and DFIG rotor current are assumed to be unchanged during the buck period. But in fact, VsqThe change in (c) may cause the frequency of the islanded grid to drift. Moreover, since the DFIG is switched to the VDACC mode, the rotor current value also changes. Thus, ψsnCannot be completely eliminated, which implies that the stator current still contains a certain dc component. To further suppress the influence of the dc current component on the MMC-HVDC dc voltage fluctuations, the stator current may generally be proportional to the free component of the rotor current.
Establishing a proportional relation of free components of the stator current and the rotor current:
Irn=rIsn(10)
in which r is a scaling factor, IrnRepresenting rotor currentsFree component, IsnRepresenting the free component of the stator current, the stator free flux linkage psisnIs shown as
ψsn=LmIsn+LrIrn(11)
In the formula, LrIs a generator stator inductance;
by substituting formula (11) for formula (10) to obtain
Figure BDA0002443209570000084
As shown in formula (12), r>When 0, through reasonably selecting r, I can be obviously reducedsnThe value of (c). However, in the process of separating the free component of the stator current, delay is introduced in the filtering link, and amplitude and phase errors are increased in the transient state, so that the dynamic control effect is poor. Moreover, the active power regulation performance of the DFIG is inevitably influenced by the indirect control of the free component of the stator current through a rotor current control loop.
To overcome this problem, a feed Forward Transient Stator Current Control (FTSCC) method as shown in fig. 10 is proposed. The implementation method of the FTSCC may be described as follows:
the method comprises the following steps: d-axis component i of stator currentsdQ-axis component isqGenerating transient compensation voltage through a second-order band-pass filter;
step two: introducing the voltage transient compensation term in the step one as additional feedforward compensation at the output end of the RSC current regulator, so that a control closed loop is formed to ensure the correct orientation of the output voltage of the rotor converter and the transient induction voltage; when the voltage at the stator terminal is reduced, more accurate transient voltage compensation is provided on the rotor circuit, so that the direct current component of the stator current is restrained;
step three: the rotor current control loop also adopts a resonance control link, the resonance frequency is 50Hz, and the resonance control link is used for improving the d-axis component i of the rotor currentrdAnd rotor current q-axis component irqThe tracking accuracy of the command value reduces the ripple component in the rotor current.
In order to verify the effectiveness of the coordinated control strategy of the invention, a simulation model shown in FIG. 1 is built on a PSCAD/EMTDC platform.
Considering the most severe conditions: the wind power plant operates according to the maximum power, and a three-phase short-circuit fault is simulated at a grid-connected point of the REMMC. Lower limit of decompression depth is taken during simulation
Figure BDA0002443209570000091
And the equivalent capacity inertia time constant H of the MMC-HVDC is 36 ms. Taking in simulation
Figure BDA0002443209570000092
θ10.3218 (corresponding to the depressurization duration Δ t)2-3=Ts/4). The scheme of the present invention is compared to two typical buck control strategies. A typical buck control scheme can be described as: the first scheme is as follows: applying demagnetization control on the wind power plant only through the SEMMC without changing the control mode of the DFIG, and reducing the voltage of the island power grid to 0; scheme II: the voltage droop control is employed while reducing the torque command value of the DFIG to 0. The simulation results obtained are shown in fig. 11-16.
Fig. 11-16 show the dynamic variation of the electrical quantities of the dc system during a fault. As shown in fig. 11, the real power output by REMMC after grid fault is reduced to 0. As can be seen from fig. 12, in case of the scheme one, the dc voltage continues to increase because the islanded grid loses step (fig. 13), resulting in the voltage V of the islanded gridw(FIG. 14) and active Power Pw(FIG. 16) cannot be lowered to 0. And the wind power plant transient output current iw(fig. 15) a very high value is reached. When the second scheme is adopted, because the DFIG is not demagnetized in the voltage reduction process, the direct current voltage (figure 12) and the active power (figure 16) output by the wind farm fluctuate dramatically. Compared with the scheme, the scheme of the invention realizes the demagnetization control of the DFIG through the SVDC and the FTSCC, and prevents the direct-current voltage fluctuation; the synchronization stability of the islanded grid is guaranteed by introducing a VDACC to the DFIG (FIG. 13), and wind farm output overcurrent is prevented (FIG. 15).
FIGS. 17-24 illustrate dynamic responses within a DFIG unit under different buck control schemes. As can be seen from fig. 17 and 18, both the first and the second embodiments of the present invention achieve demagnetization of the DFIG by simultaneously changing d-axis and q-axis components of the islanded grid voltage, so that the free component of the stator flux linkage can be significantly suppressed (fig. 19 and 20). And in the second scheme, only the d-axis component of the island grid voltage is reduced, and the demagnetization function is not realized, so that the stator flux linkage fluctuation is obvious. It should be noted that in the solution of the present invention, the stator flux linkage still has some fluctuation, which is caused by SEMMC switching to droop control. As can be seen from fig. 21 and 22, the fluctuation of the stator current can be sufficiently suppressed by the proposed scheme, which is a result of the combined action of SVDC and FTSCC. As can be seen from fig. 23 and 24, the rotor transient current is minimized and the required rotor voltage is also minimized by using the proposed solution.
The above-described calculation examples of the present invention are merely to explain the calculation model and the calculation flow of the present invention in detail, and are not intended to limit the embodiments of the present invention. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that other variations and modifications of the present invention can be made based on the above description, and it is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed, and all such modifications and variations are possible and contemplated as falling within the scope of the invention.

Claims (5)

1. The cooperative fault ride-through method for the large-scale double-fed wind power plant through flexible direct current outgoing is characterized by comprising the following steps:
during a fault period, the sending end converter station inhibits direct-current voltage fluctuation and realizes self-adaptive balance of direct-current power through two-stage voltage reduction control, and the double-fed wind turbine generator set inhibits rotor overcurrent and direct-current components of stator current through transient current correction control;
the two-stage step-down control consists of stepped step-down control and voltage droop control, and the modified transient current control consists of voltage type active current reduction control and feedforward transient stator current control.
2. The cooperative fault ride-through method for the large-scale doubly-fed wind farm through the flexible direct current outgoing according to claim 1, characterized in that the specific process of the stepped voltage reduction control is as follows:
at t1At the moment, the PCC has a three-phase short-circuit fault, at t2Time of day, DC voltage VdchReaching a protection action threshold
Figure FDA0002443209560000015
And the moment when the first step reduction occurs is defined as t3The second step-down occurs at a time t4Stator terminal voltage V at each periodsAre respectively expressed as d-axis and q-axis components
Figure FDA0002443209560000011
Figure FDA0002443209560000012
In the formula, t represents time, VsdRepresenting stator terminal voltage VsD-axis component of (V)s normalRepresenting the stator terminal voltage during normal operation,
Figure FDA0002443209560000016
is t2~t3D-axis component of stator terminal voltage amplitude, V, of time periods drop1Is t2~t3The magnitude of the stator terminal voltage over a period of time,
Figure FDA0002443209560000017
is t3~t4D-axis component of stator terminal voltage amplitude, V, of time periods drop2Is t3~t4Stator terminal voltage amplitude of time period, theta1Represents t2~t3Phase angle of stator terminal voltage in time interval;
Vsqrepresenting stator terminal voltage VsThe q-axis component of (a) is,
Figure FDA0002443209560000018
is t2~t3A q-axis component of stator terminal voltage amplitude of the time period;
stator terminal voltage phasor
Figure FDA0002443209560000014
Is shown as
Figure FDA0002443209560000013
In the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
Figure FDA0002443209560000019
e is the natural logarithm, j is the unit of the imaginary number, omegasIs the synchronous angular frequency;
stator flux linkage vector psi corresponding to different voltage drop degreessExpressed as:
Figure FDA0002443209560000021
in the formula IrRepresenting rotor current, RsAnd LsStator resistance and inductance, L respectivelymFor generator excitation inductance, C1And C2Respectively represents t2And t3Time stator free flux linkage psisnAn initial value of (1);
at t2~t3And t3~t4Time period, psisAre all free components psisnAnd the mandatory component psisfComposition is carried out;
rotor current IrAt t2To t4The time interval is not changed, and C is obtained according to the flux linkage conservation principle1And C2Expression (c):
Figure FDA0002443209560000022
3. the cooperative fault ride-through method for the large-scale doubly-fed wind farm through the flexible direct current outgoing according to claim 2, wherein the specific process of the voltage droop control stage is as follows:
at t4Moment, SEMMC switches to voltage droop control mode, Vsq=0,VsdAnd VdchDesigned to be linear, i.e.
Figure FDA0002443209560000023
In the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
Figure FDA0002443209560000026
representing the voltage reduction control exiting the corresponding DC voltage threshold, KFRTIs the sag factor, KFRTIs expressed as
Figure FDA0002443209560000024
In the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
Figure FDA0002443209560000027
is the upper limit of the MMC-HVDC direct voltage, Vs minlimRepresents the lower limit of the depressurization depth.
4. The cooperative fault ride-through method for the large-scale doubly-fed wind farm through the flexible direct current outgoing according to claim 3, characterized in that the specific process of the voltage type active current reduction control is as follows:
rotor d-axis current reference value irdrefIs expressed as
Figure FDA0002443209560000025
In the formula, Vs thresThe voltage threshold for switching from constant power control mode to VDACC mode,
Figure FDA0002443209560000031
representing d-axis electricity of rotor in normal operationA stream;
rotor q-axis current reference value irqrefIs expressed as
irqref=-Vs/Lm(9)。
5. The cooperative fault ride-through method for the large-scale doubly-fed wind farm through the flexible direct current outgoing according to claim 4, characterized in that the specific process of the feedforward transient stator current control is as follows:
the method comprises the following steps: d-axis component i of stator currentsdQ-axis component isqGenerating transient compensation voltage through a second-order band-pass filter;
step two: introducing the voltage transient compensation term in the step one as additional feedforward compensation at the output end of the RSC current regulator, so that a control closed loop is formed to ensure the correct orientation of the output voltage of the rotor converter and the transient induction voltage; when the voltage of the stator terminal is reduced, transient voltage compensation is provided on the rotor circuit, and the direct current component of the stator current is restrained;
step three: the rotor current control loop adopts a resonance control link with a resonance frequency of 50Hz and is used for improving a d-axis component i of the rotor currentrdAnd rotor current q-axis component irqThe tracking accuracy of the command value reduces the ripple component in the rotor current.
CN202010271195.9A 2020-04-08 2020-04-08 Collaborative fault ride-through method for large-scale doubly-fed wind farm through flexible direct current delivery Active CN111431206B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010271195.9A CN111431206B (en) 2020-04-08 2020-04-08 Collaborative fault ride-through method for large-scale doubly-fed wind farm through flexible direct current delivery

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010271195.9A CN111431206B (en) 2020-04-08 2020-04-08 Collaborative fault ride-through method for large-scale doubly-fed wind farm through flexible direct current delivery

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN111431206A true CN111431206A (en) 2020-07-17
CN111431206B CN111431206B (en) 2023-05-19

Family

ID=71555946

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202010271195.9A Active CN111431206B (en) 2020-04-08 2020-04-08 Collaborative fault ride-through method for large-scale doubly-fed wind farm through flexible direct current delivery

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN111431206B (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111711221A (en) * 2020-07-22 2020-09-25 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 Feedforward selection method in flexible direct current control circuit and related device
CN112271756A (en) * 2020-11-18 2021-01-26 国网黑龙江省电力有限公司电力科学研究院 New energy station grid connection stability evaluation method
CN112421682A (en) * 2020-12-11 2021-02-26 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 Multi-stage voltage correction control method and device for offshore alternating current fault
CN113794238A (en) * 2021-11-15 2021-12-14 四川大学 High-proportion wind power alternating current-direct current transmission end power grid cooperative fault ride-through method and device

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120248772A1 (en) * 2011-04-01 2012-10-04 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Control device of wind turbine generator, wind turbine generator, wind farm, and control method for wind turbine generator
CN104636988A (en) * 2015-02-11 2015-05-20 国家电网公司 Active power distribution network assessment method
CN106532771A (en) * 2016-12-01 2017-03-22 国网新疆电力公司经济技术研究院 Low-voltage ride-through realization method for double-fed wind turbine generator with adaptive function on voltage drop
CN106849116A (en) * 2016-12-01 2017-06-13 国网福建省电力有限公司 A kind of wind power plant idle work optimization method
CN109755966A (en) * 2019-03-25 2019-05-14 哈尔滨工业大学 The collaboration fault ride-through method that extensive offshore wind farm is sent outside through flexible direct current
CN110401225A (en) * 2019-08-16 2019-11-01 国网福建省电力有限公司 The high voltage crossing control method of double-fed blower after consideration current transformer power constraint

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120248772A1 (en) * 2011-04-01 2012-10-04 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Control device of wind turbine generator, wind turbine generator, wind farm, and control method for wind turbine generator
CN104636988A (en) * 2015-02-11 2015-05-20 国家电网公司 Active power distribution network assessment method
CN106532771A (en) * 2016-12-01 2017-03-22 国网新疆电力公司经济技术研究院 Low-voltage ride-through realization method for double-fed wind turbine generator with adaptive function on voltage drop
CN106849116A (en) * 2016-12-01 2017-06-13 国网福建省电力有限公司 A kind of wind power plant idle work optimization method
CN109755966A (en) * 2019-03-25 2019-05-14 哈尔滨工业大学 The collaboration fault ride-through method that extensive offshore wind farm is sent outside through flexible direct current
CN110401225A (en) * 2019-08-16 2019-11-01 国网福建省电力有限公司 The high voltage crossing control method of double-fed blower after consideration current transformer power constraint

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111711221A (en) * 2020-07-22 2020-09-25 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 Feedforward selection method in flexible direct current control circuit and related device
CN112271756A (en) * 2020-11-18 2021-01-26 国网黑龙江省电力有限公司电力科学研究院 New energy station grid connection stability evaluation method
CN112421682A (en) * 2020-12-11 2021-02-26 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 Multi-stage voltage correction control method and device for offshore alternating current fault
CN113794238A (en) * 2021-11-15 2021-12-14 四川大学 High-proportion wind power alternating current-direct current transmission end power grid cooperative fault ride-through method and device
CN113794238B (en) * 2021-11-15 2022-02-11 四川大学 High-proportion wind power alternating current-direct current transmission end power grid cooperative fault ride-through method and device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN111431206B (en) 2023-05-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Moghadasi et al. A comprehensive review of low-voltage-ride-through methods for fixed-speed wind power generators
Howlader et al. A comprehensive review of low voltage ride through capability strategies for the wind energy conversion systems
Justo et al. Doubly-fed induction generator based wind turbines: A comprehensive review of fault ride-through strategies
CN104113077B (en) A kind of control method for coordinating of dual-feed asynchronous wind power generator high voltage crossing
CN111431206B (en) Collaborative fault ride-through method for large-scale doubly-fed wind farm through flexible direct current delivery
Kyaw et al. Fault ride through and voltage regulation for grid connected wind turbine
US20070278797A1 (en) Power conditioning architecture for a wind turbine
CN109755966B (en) Cooperative fault ride-through method for large-scale offshore wind power through flexible direct current delivery
Qiao et al. Power quality and dynamic performance improvement of wind farms using a STATCOM
Kynev et al. Comparison of modern STATCOM and synchronous condenser for power transmission systems
CN109245147A (en) Accumulation energy type static synchronous compensating device and direct current transportation commutation failure suppressing method
Shin et al. Low voltage ride through (LVRT) control strategy of grid-connected variable speed wind turbine generator system
CN112398156A (en) Offshore wind power system fault combined ride-through method based on flexible-direct MMC current converter
CN111628507A (en) Novel phase modulator and SVG coordinated control method for suppressing transient overvoltage
CN110518600A (en) A kind of grid-connected active support and control structure of PMSG of the modified multi-machine parallel connection based on VSG
Firouzi Low-voltage ride-through (LVRT) capability enhancement of DFIG-based wind farm by using bridge-type superconducting fault current limiter (BTSFCL)
Zhu et al. Stepwise voltage drop and transient current control strategies to enhance fault ride-through capability of MMC-HVDC connected DFIG wind farms
CN109066735B (en) Double-fed wind power generation system under unbalanced grid voltage and control method thereof
Nawir Integration of wind farms into weak AC grid
CN113675897A (en) Active priority LVRT control method and GSC control method
CN109256798B (en) Ride-through operation method of DFIG system under voltage symmetry fault
Alsmadi et al. Comprehensive analysis of the dynamic behavior of grid-connected DFIG-based wind turbines under LVRT conditions
Mahvash et al. A look-up table based approach for fault ride-through capability enhancement of a grid connected DFIG wind turbine
CN111864783B (en) Direct-current short-circuit fault ride-through control method and related device
Patil et al. Grid Integration of the Wind Power Generation and its Potential Impact on Sub-Synchronous Oscillation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant