CN111337267B - Method for evaluating biological simulation degree of dummy in collision test - Google Patents

Method for evaluating biological simulation degree of dummy in collision test Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN111337267B
CN111337267B CN202010110392.2A CN202010110392A CN111337267B CN 111337267 B CN111337267 B CN 111337267B CN 202010110392 A CN202010110392 A CN 202010110392A CN 111337267 B CN111337267 B CN 111337267B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
index
value
dummy
simulation degree
injury
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN202010110392.2A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN111337267A (en
Inventor
刘志新
娄磊
史永万
武永强
肖广宇
马伟杰
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co Ltd
Original Assignee
China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co Ltd filed Critical China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co Ltd
Priority to CN202010110392.2A priority Critical patent/CN111337267B/en
Publication of CN111337267A publication Critical patent/CN111337267A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN111337267B publication Critical patent/CN111337267B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01MTESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M17/00Testing of vehicles
    • G01M17/007Wheeled or endless-tracked vehicles
    • G01M17/0078Shock-testing of vehicles
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01MTESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M7/00Vibration-testing of structures; Shock-testing of structures
    • G01M7/08Shock-testing

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention provides a method for evaluating the biological simulation degree of a dummy in a collision test, which divides the quantitative indexes of the biological simulation degree of the dummy in the collision test into three levels: the first-level index is a biological simulation degree quantification index value of each part of the dummy; the secondary index is a simulation degree quantization index value of the injury index corresponding to each part of the dummy; the three-level indexes are simulation quantization index values quantized from different dimensions for each damage index. The invention relates to a method for evaluating the biological simulation degree of a dummy in a collision test, which correlates the calibration test result of the dummy under the same test working condition with the reference damage data of a known real human body, quantifies the biological simulation degree indexes of each part of the dummy by utilizing two methods of single value analysis and time domain curve analysis, further performs weighted calculation on each sub-index, and finally obtains the index value for evaluating the overall biological simulation degree of the dummy.

Description

Method for evaluating biological simulation degree of dummy in collision test
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the field of automobile crash tests, and particularly relates to a method for evaluating the biological simulation degree of a dummy in a crash test.
Background
In an automobile collision test, a collision test dummy is used as a substitute of a real person to bear the function of measuring human body injury in a collision process, various physical signals are measured mainly through various sensors arranged inside the collision test to represent the injury degree of an automobile to a human body in the collision process, so that the dummy in the collision test is important measuring equipment for directly evaluating the safety performance of the automobile, and the quality of the biological simulation degree of the dummy is directly related to whether the safety performance of the automobile is correctly evaluated or not, so that whether the life and property capacity of passengers or pedestrians is effectively protected or not is also related to, and therefore, the correct evaluation of the biological simulation of the dummy in the collision test is an important content of the research of the automobile collision test.
Under the prior art, the evaluation of the biological simulation degree of each part is generally carried out by the calibration test of each part of the dummy, and an evaluation method aiming at the whole biological simulation degree of the dummy in the collision test is lacked, which mainly has the following three problems: firstly, the calibration test of each part of the dummy can not obtain a quantitative result, and only can obtain a qualitative evaluation result which is in line with or not in line with the quantitative result; secondly, each part of the dummy also has a plurality of sensors, so a plurality of data channels and injury indexes can be obtained in a calibration test, but each index is independently judged at present, and the whole condition of the part of the dummy is not evaluated; thirdly, calibration tests of all parts of the dummy are relatively independent, and a comprehensive evaluation result of the biological simulation degree of the whole dummy cannot be obtained, so that the biological simulation degree of different dummies cannot be directly and transversely compared in the conventional evaluation method for the biological simulation degree of the dummy, which is lack of quantification and aims at the whole collision dummy, and finally, the serious problem of inaccurate evaluation on the automobile collision test result is caused.
Disclosure of Invention
In view of the above, the present invention is directed to a method for evaluating the biological simulation degree of a dummy in a collision test, wherein the calibration test result of the dummy under the same test condition is associated with the known real human body reference damage data, and by using two methods, namely single value analysis and time domain curve analysis, the biological simulation degree indexes of each part of the dummy are quantified by calculating the association between different measurement signal indexes of each part of the collision dummy and the known reference data, and further performing weighted calculation on each sub-index, thereby finally obtaining an index value for evaluating the overall biological simulation degree of the dummy.
In order to achieve the purpose, the technical scheme of the invention is realized as follows:
a method for evaluating the degree of human dummy biosimilarity in a crash test, comprising:
the method comprises the following steps: firstly, dividing the quantitative indexes of the biological simulation degree of the dummy in the collision test into three stages: the first-level index is a quantitative index value of biological simulation degree of each part of the dummy, and is marked as BiComprises a head partNeck, chest, pelvis, legs, different corner marks representing different parts; the second-level index is the simulation degree quantization index value of the injury index corresponding to each part of the dummy, and is marked as Bi,jDifferent corner marks represent simulation degree quantization index values of corresponding damage indexes of corresponding parts; the three-level index is an emulation degree quantization index value obtained by quantizing each damage index from different dimensions, and is marked as Bi,j,kDifferent corner marks represent corresponding parts and correspond to different dimension simulation degree quantization index values of the injury index;
step two: and (3) calculating the simulation degree quantization index value of the three-level index: obtaining the type of the dimension of the injury index according to known real human body reference injury data, and correspondingly selecting single value analysis or time domain curve analysis to calculate the simulation quantitative index value of the three-level index; if the type of the damage index dimension is a curve shape, the method is suitable for a time domain curve analysis mode; and if the types of the damage index dimension are HTC value, peak value, 3ms value and VC, the method is suitable for single-value analysis.
Step three: and calculating a second-level index simulation degree quantization index value by using the third-level index simulation degree quantization index value, wherein the calculation method comprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0002388915110000031
wherein Wi,j,kA weight of a kth quantization dimension that is a jth injury indicator for an ith prosthetic site;
step four: and calculating a first-level index simulation degree quantization index value by using a second-level index simulation degree quantization index value, wherein the calculation method comprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0002388915110000032
wherein Wi,jA weight of a jth injury index for an ith prosthetic site;
step five: and (3) calculating the total biological simulation degree index of the collision dummy by utilizing the first-level index simulation degree quantization index value, wherein the calculation method comprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0002388915110000033
wherein WiThe weight of each part of the dummy is obtained.
Further, in the second step, if the three-level index simulation quantization index value is calculated by using a single-value analysis method, the calculation method is as follows:
extracting corresponding injury value according to known real human body reference injury data, recording as C, and the full-scale limit value is delta15%. C | with a zero point limit of δ050% · | C |; further, obtaining a corresponding injury value of the dummy in the collision test, recording the injury value as D, and calculating to obtain a simulation degree quantization index value of a three-level index:
Figure BDA0002388915110000034
further, in the second step, if the method of time domain curve analysis is applied to calculate the quantization index value B of the degree of simulation of the three-level index, the calculation method is as follows:
the method for time domain curve analysis calculates a three-level index simulation degree quantization index value B, which is calculated by four sub-indexes including a channel index T, a curve shape index Q, a curve phase index P and a curve amplitude index R, and specifically comprises the following steps:
B=0.4·T+0.2·Q+0.2·P+0.2·R
calculating a channel index T:
acquiring known real human body reference injury time domain data, recording as C (t), and calculating a full score limit value delta15%. C | with a zero point limit of δ0Acquiring injury time domain data corresponding to the collision dummy, and calculating simulation degree quantization index values at each time point, wherein the damage time domain data is denoted as D (t):
Figure BDA0002388915110000041
further, calculating a channel index T of the time domain curve, wherein N is the number of discrete time domain data points:
Figure BDA0002388915110000042
further, curve shape index Q is calculated:
intercepting known real human body reference injury time domain data C (t) and time domain data D (t) corresponding to the injury of the collision dummy in the same time period, wherein the time starting point is defined as tstartThe time end point is defined as tendIf the total number of the intercepted data is N, then N is f (t)start-tend) +1, where f is the data sampling frequency;
d (t) is translated along the time axis by m data points, the upper limit of the translation m is limited to INT (0.2N) +1, so that m ranges from 0, + -1, + -2, …, ± (INT (0.2N) + 1); after translation, the number of the overlapped part of the two groups of data is N-m;
when different movement amounts m are calculated, the phase correlation S (m) value of the real human body data and the dummy data is as follows:
the left translation calculation method comprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0002388915110000051
when m is equal to m0When S (m) reaches a maximum value S (m)0);
The curve shape index Q is then equal to:
Figure BDA0002388915110000052
on the basis of the calculated values, further calculating a curve phase index P:
Figure BDA0002388915110000053
on the basis of the calculated value, further curve amplitude index R:
Figure BDA0002388915110000054
Figure BDA0002388915110000055
compared with the prior art, the method for evaluating the biological simulation degree of the dummy in the collision test has the following advantages:
the invention relates to a method for evaluating the biological simulation degree of a dummy in a collision test, which correlates the calibration test result of the dummy under the same test working condition with the known real human body reference damage data, quantifies the biological simulation degree index of each part of the dummy by calculating the correlation between different measurement signal indexes of each part of the collision dummy and the known reference data by utilizing two methods of single value analysis and time domain curve analysis, and further performs weighted calculation on each sub-index to finally obtain the index value for evaluating the total biological simulation degree of the dummy.
Drawings
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate an embodiment of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the invention and not to limit the invention.
In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a method for evaluating the degree of human artifact simulation in a crash test according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
It should be noted that the embodiments and features of the embodiments may be combined with each other without conflict.
In the description of the present invention, it is to be understood that the terms "center", "longitudinal", "lateral", "up", "down", "front", "back", "left", "right", "vertical", "horizontal", "top", "bottom", "inner", "outer", and the like, indicate orientations or positional relationships based on those shown in the drawings, and are used only for convenience in describing the present invention and for simplicity in description, and do not indicate or imply that the referenced devices or elements must have a particular orientation, be constructed and operated in a particular orientation, and thus, are not to be construed as limiting the present invention. Furthermore, the terms "first", "second", etc. are used for descriptive purposes only and are not to be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly indicating the number of technical features indicated. Thus, a feature defined as "first," "second," etc. may explicitly or implicitly include one or more of that feature. In the description of the present invention, "a plurality" means two or more unless otherwise specified.
In the description of the present invention, it should be noted that, unless otherwise explicitly specified or limited, the terms "mounted," "connected," and "connected" are to be construed broadly, e.g., as meaning either a fixed connection, a removable connection, or an integral connection; can be mechanically or electrically connected; they may be connected directly or indirectly through intervening media, or they may be interconnected between two elements. The specific meaning of the above terms in the present invention can be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art through specific situations.
The present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the embodiments with reference to the attached drawings.
A method for evaluating the degree of human dummy biosimilarity in a crash test, comprising:
as shown in fig. 1, step one: firstly, dividing the quantitative indexes of the biological simulation degree of the dummy in the collision test into three stages: the first-level index is a quantitative index value of biological simulation degree of each part of the dummy, and is marked as BiThe head, the neck, the chest, the pelvis and the legs are included, and different corner marks represent different parts; the second-level index is the simulation degree quantization index value of the injury index corresponding to each part of the dummy, and is marked as Bi,jDifferent angle marks represent simulation degree quantization index values of corresponding injury indexes of corresponding parts, for example, the chest comprises two indexes of composite acceleration and compression amount, and the second-level indexes are B3,1And B3,2(ii) a Simulation of quantization of each injury index from different dimensions by three-level indexesThe metric value is marked as Bi,j,kDifferent angle marks represent corresponding parts, and different dimension simulation degree quantization index values corresponding to the injury index, such as chest compression amount, are judged from three angles, including a peak value, a VC value and a curve shape, which are respectively marked as B3,2,1、B3,2,2And B3,2,3
Step two: and (3) calculating the simulation degree quantization index value of the three-level index: obtaining the type of the dimension of the injury index according to known real human body reference injury data, and correspondingly selecting single value analysis or time domain curve analysis to calculate the simulation quantitative index value of the three-level index;
if the type of the damage index dimension is a curve shape, the method is suitable for a time domain curve analysis mode; and if the types of the damage index dimension are HIC value, peak value, 3ms value and VC, the method is suitable for a single-value analysis mode.
Step three: and calculating a second-level index simulation degree quantization index value by using the third-level index simulation degree quantization index value, wherein the calculation method comprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0002388915110000071
wherein Wi,j,kA weight of a kth quantization dimension that is a jth injury indicator for an ith prosthetic site;
step four: and calculating a first-level index simulation degree quantization index value by using a second-level index simulation degree quantization index value, wherein the calculation method comprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0002388915110000081
wherein Wi,jA weight of a jth injury index for an ith prosthetic site;
step five: and (3) calculating the total biological simulation degree index of the collision dummy by utilizing the first-level index simulation degree quantization index value, wherein the calculation method comprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0002388915110000082
wherein WiFor the dummy eachThe weight of the location.
Further, in the second step, if the three-level index simulation quantization index value is calculated by using a single-value analysis method, the calculation method is as follows:
extracting corresponding injury value according to known real human body reference injury data, recording as C, and the full-scale limit value is delta15%. C | with a zero point limit of δ050% · | C |; further, obtaining a corresponding injury value of the dummy in the collision test, recording the injury value as D, and calculating to obtain a simulation degree quantization index value of a three-level index:
Figure BDA0002388915110000083
further, in the second step, if the method of time domain curve analysis is applied to calculate the quantization index value B of the degree of simulation of the three-level index, the calculation method is as follows:
the method for time domain curve analysis calculates a three-level index simulation degree quantization index value B, which is calculated by four sub-indexes including a channel index T, a curve shape index Q, a curve phase index P and a curve amplitude index R, and specifically comprises the following steps:
B=0.4·T+0.2·Q+0.2·P+0.2·R
calculating a channel index T:
acquiring known real human body reference injury time domain data, recording as C (t), and calculating a full score limit value delta15%. C | with a zero point limit of δ0Acquiring injury time domain data corresponding to the collision dummy, and calculating simulation degree quantization index values at each time point, wherein the damage time domain data is denoted as D (t):
Figure BDA0002388915110000091
further, calculating a channel index T of the time domain curve, wherein N is the number of discrete time domain data points:
Figure BDA0002388915110000092
further, curve shape index Q is calculated:
intercepting known real human body reference injury time domain data C (t) and time domain data D (t) corresponding to the injury of the collision dummy in the same time period, wherein the time starting point is defined as tstartThe time end point is defined as tendIf the total number of the intercepted data is N, then N is f (t)start-tend) +1, where f is the data sampling frequency;
d (t) is translated along the time axis by m data points, the upper limit of the translation m is limited to INT (0.2N) +1, so that m ranges from 0, + -1, + -2, …, ± (INT (0.2N) + 1); after translation, the number of the overlapped part of the two groups of data is N-m;
when different movement amounts m are calculated, the phase correlation S (m) value of the real human body data and the dummy data is as follows:
the left translation calculation method comprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0002388915110000093
when m is equal to m0When S (m) reaches a maximum value S (m)0);
The curve shape index Q is then equal to:
Figure BDA0002388915110000101
on the basis of the calculated values, further calculating a curve phase index P:
Figure BDA0002388915110000102
on the basis of the calculated value, further curve amplitude index R:
Figure BDA0002388915110000103
Figure BDA0002388915110000104
the present invention is not limited to the above preferred embodiments, and any modifications, equivalent substitutions, improvements, etc. within the spirit and principle of the present invention should be included in the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims (2)

1. A method for evaluating the degree of human dummy biological simulation in a crash test, characterized by: the method comprises the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps: firstly, dividing the quantitative indexes of the biological simulation degree of the dummy in the collision test into three stages: the first-level index is a quantitative index value of biological simulation degree of each part of the dummy, and is marked as BiThe head, the neck, the chest, the pelvis and the legs are included, and different corner marks represent different parts; the second-level index is the simulation degree quantization index value of the injury index corresponding to each part of the dummy, and is marked as Bi,jDifferent corner marks represent simulation degree quantization index values of corresponding damage indexes of corresponding parts; the three-level index is an emulation degree quantization index value obtained by quantizing each damage index from different dimensions, and is marked as Bi,j,kDifferent corner marks represent corresponding parts and correspond to different dimension simulation degree quantization index values of the injury index;
step two: and (3) calculating the simulation degree quantization index value of the three-level index: obtaining the type of the dimension of the injury index according to known real human body reference injury data, and correspondingly selecting single value analysis or time domain curve analysis to calculate the simulation quantitative index value of the three-level index;
in the second step, if the method of time domain curve analysis is applied to calculate the quantization index value B of the three-level index simulation degree, the calculation method is as follows:
the method for time domain curve analysis calculates a three-level index simulation degree quantization index value B, which is calculated by four sub-indexes including a channel index T, a curve shape index Q, a curve phase index P and a curve amplitude index R, and specifically comprises the following steps:
B=0.4·T+0.2·Q+0.2·P+0.2·R
calculating a channel index T:
acquiring known real human body reference injury time domain data, recording as C (t), and calculating a full score limit value delta15%. C | with a zero point limit of δ0Acquiring injury time domain data corresponding to the collision dummy, and calculating simulation degree quantization index values at each time point, wherein the damage time domain data is denoted as D (t):
Figure FDA0003278858320000021
further, calculating a channel index T of the time domain curve, wherein N is the number of discrete time domain data points:
Figure FDA0003278858320000022
further, curve shape index Q is calculated:
intercepting known real human body reference injury time domain data C (t) and time domain data D (t) corresponding to the injury of the collision dummy in the same time period, wherein the time starting point is defined as tstartThe time end point is defined as tendIf the total number of the intercepted data is N, then N is f (t)start-tend) +1, where f is the data sampling frequency;
d (t) is translated along the time axis by m data points, the upper limit of the translation m is limited to INT (0.2N) +1, so that m ranges from 0, + -1, + -2, …, ± (INT (0.2N) + 1); after translation, the number of the overlapped part of the two groups of data is N-m;
when different movement amounts m are calculated, the phase correlation S (m) value of the real human body data and the dummy data is as follows:
the left translation calculation method comprises the following steps:
Figure FDA0003278858320000023
when m is equal to m0When S (m) reaches a maximum value S (m)0);
The curve shape index Q is then equal to:
Figure FDA0003278858320000031
on the basis of the calculated values, further calculating a curve phase index P:
Figure FDA0003278858320000032
on the basis of the calculated value, further curve amplitude index R:
Figure FDA0003278858320000033
Figure FDA0003278858320000034
step three: and calculating a second-level index simulation degree quantization index value by using the third-level index simulation degree quantization index value, wherein the calculation method comprises the following steps:
Figure FDA0003278858320000035
wherein Wi,j,kA weight of a kth quantization dimension that is a jth injury indicator for an ith prosthetic site;
step four: and calculating a first-level index simulation degree quantization index value by using a second-level index simulation degree quantization index value, wherein the calculation method comprises the following steps:
Figure FDA0003278858320000036
wherein Wi,jIs the ithA weight of a jth injury index for an individual prosthetic site;
step five: and (3) calculating the total biological simulation degree index of the collision dummy by utilizing the first-level index simulation degree quantization index value, wherein the calculation method comprises the following steps:
Figure FDA0003278858320000037
wherein WiThe weight of each part of the dummy is obtained.
2. A method for evaluating the bio-simulation degree of a dummy in a collision test according to claim 1, characterized in that: in the second step, if the three-level index simulation degree quantization index value is calculated by using a single-value analysis method, the calculation method is as follows:
extracting corresponding injury value according to known real human body reference injury data, recording as C, and the full-scale limit value is delta15%. C | with a zero point limit of δ050% · | C |; further, obtaining a corresponding injury value of the dummy in the collision test, recording the injury value as D, and calculating to obtain a simulation degree quantization index value of a three-level index:
Figure FDA0003278858320000041
in the second step, if the method of time domain curve analysis is applied to calculate the quantization index value B of the three-level index simulation degree, the calculation method is as follows:
the method for time domain curve analysis calculates a three-level index simulation degree quantization index value B, which is calculated by four sub-indexes including a channel index T, a curve shape index Q, a curve phase index P and a curve amplitude index R, and specifically comprises the following steps:
B=0.4·T+0.2·Q+0.2·P+0.2·R
calculating a channel index T:
acquiring known real human body reference injury time domain data, recording as C (t), and calculating a full score limit value delta15%. C | with a zero point limit of δ050%. C, where C max (| max (C (t)) |, | min (C (t)) |),acquiring injury time domain data corresponding to the collision dummy, recording the injury time domain data as D (t), and calculating an analog degree quantization index value at each time point:
Figure FDA0003278858320000042
further, calculating a channel index T of the time domain curve, wherein N is the number of discrete time domain data points:
Figure FDA0003278858320000051
further, curve shape index Q is calculated:
intercepting known real human body reference injury time domain data C (t) and time domain data D (t) corresponding to the injury of the collision dummy in the same time period, wherein the time starting point is defined as tstartThe time end point is defined as tendIf the total number of the intercepted data is N, then N is f (t)start-tend) +1, where f is the data sampling frequency;
d (t) is translated along the time axis by m data points, the upper limit of the translation m is limited to INT (0.2N) +1, so that m ranges from 0, + -1, + -2, …, ± (INT (0.2N) + 1); after translation, the number of the overlapped part of the two groups of data is N-m;
when different movement amounts m are calculated, the phase correlation S (m) value of the real human body data and the dummy data is as follows:
the left translation calculation method comprises the following steps:
Figure FDA0003278858320000052
when m is equal to m0When S (m) reaches a maximum value S (m)0);
The curve shape index Q is then equal to:
Figure FDA0003278858320000053
on the basis of the calculated values, further calculating a curve phase index P:
Figure FDA0003278858320000061
on the basis of the calculated value, further curve amplitude index R:
Figure FDA0003278858320000062
Figure FDA0003278858320000063
CN202010110392.2A 2020-02-21 2020-02-21 Method for evaluating biological simulation degree of dummy in collision test Active CN111337267B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010110392.2A CN111337267B (en) 2020-02-21 2020-02-21 Method for evaluating biological simulation degree of dummy in collision test

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010110392.2A CN111337267B (en) 2020-02-21 2020-02-21 Method for evaluating biological simulation degree of dummy in collision test

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN111337267A CN111337267A (en) 2020-06-26
CN111337267B true CN111337267B (en) 2021-11-19

Family

ID=71181862

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202010110392.2A Active CN111337267B (en) 2020-02-21 2020-02-21 Method for evaluating biological simulation degree of dummy in collision test

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN111337267B (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112764978A (en) * 2021-01-18 2021-05-07 北京开拓鸿业高科技有限公司 Pressure measurement simulation degree determination method and device, storage medium and electronic equipment
CN114550278B (en) * 2022-04-28 2022-07-22 中汽研汽车检验中心(天津)有限公司 Method and equipment for determining head and face feature points of collision dummy and storage medium
CN115544852B (en) * 2022-11-28 2023-06-06 中国汽车技术研究中心有限公司 Digital human model evaluation method based on motion trail
CN117740361B (en) * 2024-02-19 2024-05-07 中国汽车技术研究中心有限公司 Automobile collision dummy lumbar vertebra testing method, equipment and medium

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1529880A (en) * 2001-06-25 2004-09-15 ���ء����߸� Programmable joint simulator with force and motion feedback
CN203798525U (en) * 2014-04-23 2014-08-27 吉林大学 Crash dummy neck structure reflecting force characteristics of human neck
CN106872180A (en) * 2017-01-24 2017-06-20 中国汽车技术研究中心 Method for judging head injury of passenger in vehicle frontal collision
CN107152995A (en) * 2017-04-24 2017-09-12 中国汽车技术研究中心 Quantitative evaluation method for test repeatability in automobile crash test
CN107607327A (en) * 2017-08-24 2018-01-19 吉利汽车研究院(宁波)有限公司 A kind of dummy's limbs scaling method and system
CN208239095U (en) * 2018-06-19 2018-12-14 中国汽车技术研究中心有限公司 A kind of children's seat trolley side collision experimental rig
JP2019191041A (en) * 2018-04-26 2019-10-31 三菱重工機械システム株式会社 Testing condition setting method of automobile collision simulation test and testing condition setting system of automobile collision simulation test
CN209802672U (en) * 2019-04-30 2019-12-17 中国汽车技术研究中心有限公司 Positioning device for lumbar vertebra calibration of Hybrid III 50th dummy

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1529880A (en) * 2001-06-25 2004-09-15 ���ء����߸� Programmable joint simulator with force and motion feedback
CN203798525U (en) * 2014-04-23 2014-08-27 吉林大学 Crash dummy neck structure reflecting force characteristics of human neck
CN106872180A (en) * 2017-01-24 2017-06-20 中国汽车技术研究中心 Method for judging head injury of passenger in vehicle frontal collision
CN107152995A (en) * 2017-04-24 2017-09-12 中国汽车技术研究中心 Quantitative evaluation method for test repeatability in automobile crash test
CN107607327A (en) * 2017-08-24 2018-01-19 吉利汽车研究院(宁波)有限公司 A kind of dummy's limbs scaling method and system
JP2019191041A (en) * 2018-04-26 2019-10-31 三菱重工機械システム株式会社 Testing condition setting method of automobile collision simulation test and testing condition setting system of automobile collision simulation test
CN208239095U (en) * 2018-06-19 2018-12-14 中国汽车技术研究中心有限公司 A kind of children's seat trolley side collision experimental rig
CN209802672U (en) * 2019-04-30 2019-12-17 中国汽车技术研究中心有限公司 Positioning device for lumbar vertebra calibration of Hybrid III 50th dummy

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"侧面碰撞试验中Euro SID-2假人与WorldSID假人伤害值的对比研究";仲衍慧;《天津科技》;20170331;第44卷(第3期);第29-34页 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN111337267A (en) 2020-06-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN111337267B (en) Method for evaluating biological simulation degree of dummy in collision test
CN107152995B (en) Quantitative evaluation method for test repeatability in automobile crash test
EP3566655B1 (en) Method and apparatus for acquiring biomechanical parameter according to ultrasonic elasticity myogram
CN103637795B (en) Automatic diagnosis function detection method for electrocardiogram instrument
US7321855B2 (en) Method for quantifying psychological stress levels using voice pattern samples
CN106370347B (en) A kind of Space Pyrotechnics Devices product ignition test pressure sensor drift self-adapting correction method
CN106228107B (en) A kind of supersonic guide-wave broken rail monitoring method based on independent component analysis
CN115575141B (en) Method and equipment for calibrating chest of automobile crash dummy
CN104739389B (en) Curved surface strain gauge, pulse signal extraction device and method and pulse condition diagnosis and treatment system
Antonaci et al. Pain threshold in humans. A study with the pressure algometer
CN114692302B (en) Fatigue crack detection method and system based on Gaussian mixture model
CN116401571A (en) Concrete filled steel tube abnormal shape void identification method based on knocking sound wave and MiniRoccket
CN103637820A (en) Hepatic fibrosis degree relative deviation identification method based on ultrasonic radio frequency (RF) time sequence
CN107220475A (en) A kind of bearing features data analysing method based on linear discriminant analysis
CN106469243B (en) Human face skin moisture and elasticity index calculation method based on digital image processing technology
CN108786074B (en) Training load monitoring device
CN109846473A (en) A method of detecting 10 seconds electrocardiogram noise jamming degree of single lead
CN107179064B (en) A kind of determination method of the confidence level of wheelset profile on-line detecting system measured value
KR101948850B1 (en) Electrical Impedance DEVICE AND METHOD FOR Damage MONITORING in SELF-SENSING CONCRETE-BASED STRUCTUREs
CN107684438B (en) Pain degree detection method and device based on ultrasonic image
Burke et al. Middle ear impedance measurements
CN111345901B (en) Method for measuring stress of radio frequency ablation pressure catheter
Liu et al. Sample size and power calculation in comparing diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers with pooled assessments
CN117435852B (en) Method for evaluating quality of output signals of bridge of measuring wheel set of railway vehicle
CN117538005B (en) Helmet impact resistance detection method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant